From nobody Thu Jan 19 11:13:48 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-security@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NyKks3mpZz2scjJ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:13:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NyKkr47TQz4KM4; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com designates 2607:f740:c::4ae as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com; dmarc=none Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (65-100-43-2.dia.static.qwest.net [65.100.43.2]) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B567338D0B; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.26.25.100] (ivy.pas.ds.pilgrimaccounting.com [10.26.25.100]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 128BA24A59; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 03:13:49 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Mel Pilgrim Subject: Can security/ca_root_nss be retired? Message-ID: <551458a3-665f-9f55-8ef9-1dd23e1e3aee@bluerosetech.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 03:13:48 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 List-Id: Security issues List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-security List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.22 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.92)[-0.924]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:c::/48, country:US]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org,freebsd-security@freebsd.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bluerosetech.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4NyKkr47TQz4KM4 X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Given /usr/share/certs exists for all supported releases, is there any reason to keep the ca_root_nss port? From eugen@grosbein.net Thu Jan 19 17:04:21 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-security@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NyTWd2qTJz2v7ym; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NyTWd0DWyz3tkQ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:04:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 30JH4VYW068941 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:04:31 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com Received: from [10.58.0.11] (dadvw [10.58.0.11] (may be forged)) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 30JH4T2t002618 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:04:30 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Can security/ca_root_nss be retired? To: Mel Pilgrim , freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <551458a3-665f-9f55-8ef9-1dd23e1e3aee@bluerosetech.com> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <56babb59-ab5b-7845-fbcb-f1cadddfd425@grosbein.net> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:04:21 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 List-Id: Security issues List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-security List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <551458a3-665f-9f55-8ef9-1dd23e1e3aee@bluerosetech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT autolearn=disabled version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT No description available. * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4NyTWd0DWyz3tkQ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/32, country:DE] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N 19.01.2023 18:13, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > Given /usr/share/certs exists for all supported releases, is there any reason to keep the ca_root_nss port? Single port may be updates more frequently and easily than base system.