Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Aug 2023 17:27:37 +0200
From:      =?UTF-8?Q?Goran_Meki=c4=87?= <meka@tilda.center>
To:        virtualization@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Sudden need for bhyve TPM Emulation... willing to port swtpm?
Message-ID:  <cffa6e51-7b60-2676-d0bb-a7bea6f120da@tilda.center>
In-Reply-To: <2d2f8c74-47d0-ebb1-154f-3aab68d8a084@tilda.center>
References:  <662af723-de9f-36d9-c960-ef08379ca26e@callfortesting.org> <1d4e6558-0c56-5758-d87e-e9bf4aacc0a5@tilda.center> <85ee3beda055c5bc9fae26c07247fe0cea1458e9.camel@FreeBSD.org> <2f1539fc-f8b2-2ec5-9c68-c60f68e66c0e@tilda.center> <2c1205c0fc48e8c6ac103d3f3ca0c722a7cd3c6e.camel@FreeBSD.org> <06ae27b6-7a38-ff73-8d9b-70b6be517ccc@tilda.center> <82499999351da778ffb9735f76ecc5d522305273.camel@FreeBSD.org> <2d2f8c74-47d0-ebb1-154f-3aab68d8a084@tilda.center>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On 8/19/23 10:27, Goran Mekić wrote:
>>> With updated port there's also support for CUSE, which would allow
>>> swtpm
>>> to be used with pass-through. The problem is that socket and CUSE
>>> have
>>> problems which I described in upstream issue:
>>> https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm/issues/820. If there are any
>>> suggestions how to fix that fuse error, I'd like to hear them and try
>>> and fix it.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> meka
>
> Hello,
>
> I was wrong. Linux CUSE is extension of FUSE while FreeBSD CUSE has 
> totally different implementation, so it can not be used by swtpm. As 
> swtpm has control and server channels, I suppose we need both. To 
> start both:
>
> # swtpm socket --tpmstate dir=/tmp/mytpm1 --ctrl 
> type=unixio,path=/tmp/mytpm1/ctrl --tpm2 --log level=20 --server 
> type=unixio,path=/tmp/mytpm1/server
>
> Now to initialize it one should run
>
> # swtpm_ioctl --unix /tmp/mytpm1/swtpm-sock -i
>
> If -i is replaced with --stop, swtpm is stopped. Now if I understand 
> correctly, init function of bhyve should do -i, deinit should do 
> --stop. If that's correct, I will start implementing init and for now 
> ignore deinit. As swtpm is BSD licenced, I think it is OK for us to 
> reuse parts of swtpm_ioctl code. Anyway, if I'm wrong about anything, 
> please point it out.
>
> Regards,
> meka
>
>
I managed to initialize the swtpm by butchering swtpm_ioctl code and 
creating this: https://bsd.to/Dq7c. I know that for bhyve it's not 
viable to include from port, but at this point I just want to make some 
progress and then I'll see how to properly do it. As swtpm is 
BSD-3-Clause licensed, we should probably import it to base, but I'll 
worry about that part when at least something starts working.

Regards,
meka



home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cffa6e51-7b60-2676-d0bb-a7bea6f120da>