From nobody Fri Jun 14 15:50:35 2024 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4W13dl6X1gz5P4SV for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2024 15:50:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W13dl4hCBz4n5k for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2024 15:50:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1718380235; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=H2TopA//8o5fvsnn8Z3MHi0ipTtZ1tJYWU/ncRziWDznL4zGqpCiGAa8u41NHNEnycd6Xt e/lYVPyViAhKQA+CsRUgcEGbD4xGMwXuW9lAOPDdd1JGW8kUTFVpsINhC2fGn+hqqCwvej g3mR8mt7n1vOdouKJuKehVIKykjy5xaHZjIE/XXdDgH44Hrq6CrXg8lZQ5gw951bgBTjQT DugK6aFimxm1aSsh1BMWArXuMYmjaMiAdcjQQbNy4pyOqS/1VXrS8i7TJbo/mBbvMeUp/p khWH8JRjqMMWlDTLf9noJe8zVbkTFu0puOrR0t0ZW+cpoZNKBlWBOTdNKGNc8w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1718380235; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sXIUyE2VD9b/AgY+j5PCqT/rYUQ26Sml7XBXa25WR9s=; b=cmBnY9ffIkwQeMIPA9k2cHXItSYIQkdVki5nrdRDRai+HZQNJrh3hRaGZYZxFLnuOHGDZh Kbo6DY1U0I6jBbHEH9wPpitvokaZCRTZyDmQJxAiCEH5FQTxpZG9usE7NnwoqtTSTdfG8h aqpYB5aztlwM0oEP6Ev9Y2WTvVrrF7cPI7u3wbsYO91HbPj/G9RZkTcAT6o/xP4gjZhBZx MzeUPqYjyIdRKZ4AwN73aqt9XNzHgGfoSyJJ8N/BVvCumS2ObobU5qMK4vvFucnMO2807R G87UCTC4NqVKym/ftENxTTxHE5+no7jtTsjZLabo96FUYSnZXT3jRAoGtozqbw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W13dl4B1xzQp6 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2024 15:50:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 45EFoZQ0034045 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2024 15:50:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 45EFoZHL034042 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2024 15:50:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255261] Slow unmount of (ZFS) filesystem at reboot time Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 15:50:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: asomers@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255261 --- Comment #12 from Alan Somers --- I just discovered that there's actually a regression in FreeBSD 13 regarding ZFS unmount speed. This PR fixes it: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/1= 6268 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sun Jun 16 14:30:02 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4W2Fm02lxxz5Ntkk for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from wfhigh2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfhigh2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.153]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W2Flz0fB4z4C99 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm1 header.b=ozbx8VXf; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=Kf6FRqgP; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 64.147.123.153 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfhigh.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7442918000A9 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:30:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:30:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1718548205; x=1718634605; bh=91nf/uQmD0g09tez1b2Hd43E2dsbtgk+ M3mEDXGY7a0=; b=ozbx8VXfCly70NJvwc7j0u8PpHHlN4vEGk72HGhZhh+scXt2 dPXOMxwrXRe/4DWlxVjK5h7WmwmawSgJV2MyEdRMB4Crw5yP4jRDyW387MscPtyt nWy6Gpi0sH/kbTAZSWhNX9EN5I80xsESc5mZORSY34ikjj650IrTI7YKX6NOojsc GgTtyJXyvVO+dyamlmyd4us69X+tYvBJ1hGn9OXqfhZxEQV790pPdR/Pgt1wJnVG humUO7Q83xS0hVn3Gz0akmNpz6tf4RH11LfOHYKuTpN0aHT4IchMF3Kym8Wti3Wd WOvCfBpTbxJZmvXpCyuBpQ338Re/wMWrctjWZw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1718548205; x=1718634605; bh=91nf/uQmD0g09tez1b2Hd43E2dsbtgk+M3m EDXGY7a0=; b=Kf6FRqgPaTul+fXtrUCDpJlkzx4pNSXlsdXjPi/8OXXgNvwhAk7 Ai38FOvwWuMnSeQ/ummb3euiPjk20bwsUAVfIdIEnONiGHEEgLH9EDYsJ3JsIKsZ Z9DQauzob5Sukyb3Bem4YMB32uSX2hCc2FR8IonPhTq0M8bTKn3u9u4A3DpQfIZL 6rLhvqzLzOD10Yerj1YogVDHt24fLKUorj2zLNyR3gzRVDr5Fq+YTuUlsbpUz51+ wwSYl0/O/N9eO/Uobzfx7imWVh6cZXQ5zBuph4JhKColckJUwPnuEZgaaC+Prf+H jdqOWEeWUVtSvrJkfXUNE4//ajOXR3MXWKA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfedvfedgjeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkgggtugesthdtredttd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepvhhoihguuceovhhoihgusehfqdhmrdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthht vghrnhepveduffeivdfffffghfegfeejfefftdeiteehteekfefhvdefgfettdeuheegff eunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvhho ihgusehfqdhmrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:30:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 15:30:02 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: swap at beginning or end of ssd disk? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.60 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.997]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.128/27]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.153:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29838, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4W2Flz0fB4z4C99 Should the swap partition(s) be installed at the start or the end of the (ssd) disk? Or does it matter? The filesystem is ufs. The partition table looks like this right now # gpart show da0 => 63 1953525105 da0 MBR (932G) 63 1985 - free - (993K) 2048 102400 1 fat32lba [active] (50M) 104448 1953420720 2 freebsd (931G) # cat /etc/fstab # Custom /etc/fstab for FreeBSD embedded images /dev/ufs/rootfs / ufs rw,noatime 1 1 /dev/msdosfs/EFI /boot/efi msdosfs rw,noatime 0 0 tmpfs /tmp tmpfs rw,mode=1777 0 0 /dev/label/growfs_swap none swap sw 0 0 md none swap sw,late,file=/usr/swap0 0 0 I plan on saving the disk image onto another machine first, re-partitioning the ssd then copying back the freebsd part of the image. The purpose is to eliminate growfs_swap and the md based swap. I'm thinking partition-based swap will be quicker even on ssd. Is this correct? -- From nobody Sun Jun 16 14:40:09 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4W2Fzs22xbz5NvQk for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:40:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W2Fzr35zhz4DNm for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:40:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.s=20230601 header.b=VDBVQ0Am; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wlosh@bsdimp.com has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b) smtp.mailfrom=wlosh@bsdimp.com Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-6e7b121be30so2538026a12.1 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 07:40:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1718548821; x=1719153621; darn=freebsd.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VlKIabYFQywqARBkM/hDs3JSzILzAuAV2f00LlXr/p4=; b=VDBVQ0Am5AvDVBTPI9RgpEtKU1vvtS478IABx40EKPBfZk+Lhr8oTQrxmkPsdsbBUL Y7BXikJ/ZqtcMEiCIhgd/oQjiqnDe5QEm2S+J5oftcdX5TfOg59ddaJmxTpKVq7msntk uANcJZe/lyVFujG1kpxRmp2XbXdTlsSUx/Pk21Ct2sAE92uCO/Nai2auB0vfhZtu7iT1 JxpLd9whKjB9ybAm3bkleUMOS4Z/qcqZkVTCU2S9dxvE+6KjW982fyhmw/Jl6iI52Ygv vYucB17OYUp3DR9BfivudpNNXb8hUSdMWZdf6d1fDkcxC5whgvRfL+xBdmf/mIGZRNiH DtYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718548821; x=1719153621; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VlKIabYFQywqARBkM/hDs3JSzILzAuAV2f00LlXr/p4=; b=xPF11LEt598oHPcBdHjJF1Vhf3Cri01DRg/D0/qK3Ecda9TNp1LA1UCK1kv8lZiqHF zVjh81vAjgSxypjLbHs/NeEcM9CsxjiShL5fzZADBIiZVafzP+vJ/WBLELOwMspf2mT7 qpI64WZBb53kvk4xZJSaMmN/r5X2LvRIg5boTMr4BMv2NbI57Gh30IYzaIXwDn4/Pi55 mF3lcq/BTSWNZc1lbzVSFPVgYxFJXjM0sqacJiaoG/LMr0CE703ry+CabHdlCLw5Bvdv vZ5Oxe8TxZHQylPfQLLW97q0xkGPIy/zaBHbQDUfLYet1QAURKO58Rk5Y2l26Mx+EBoY xN5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzHf/Aj/DJBY6lq9TlsZbqEfpsws9xwo9BBitHEOZqa5wrdUR6G fid8nRdRyFpnq+5F07ll6Kuh5Z337QWjMlCjAatTxrN1YA7ICi4/+CsASFVhKloyrNFEJezq6VB mVTKpyEibfISlKKGDS/UgSnBhNgOUb1vT28zq2vpyNO+G/us1U4U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFoKSKhEMAgciM9Fzpm8ItjoyZ8zC2fmDvHXR9ZxOu2402VCaHKIN8mIThrNzz1MHQ9/ateUDK7tOPVTQ7y/jg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:394b:b0:1b8:3fc6:ab84 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1bae841e705mr7218567637.58.1718548821289; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 07:40:21 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Warner Losh Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 08:40:09 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: swap at beginning or end of ssd disk? To: FreeBSD FS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000005c9fa061b02d4e2" X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.982]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com:s=20230601]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b:from]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4W2Fzr35zhz4DNm --00000000000005c9fa061b02d4e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 16, 2024, 8:30=E2=80=AFAM void wrote: > Should the swap partition(s) be installed at the start or the > end of the (ssd) disk? Or does it matter? The filesystem is ufs. > Doesn't matter, but make it at least 1mb aligned. This advice will change in the future to 4 or 16mb, so it wouldn't hurt to do that now. Looks like you've done that. If the size of the ssd can change (new ssd disks, fancy ones, etc), the beginning is better. Warner The partition table looks like this right now > > # gpart show da0 > =3D> 63 1953525105 da0 MBR (932G) > 63 1985 - free - (993K) > 2048 102400 1 fat32lba [active] (50M) > 104448 1953420720 2 freebsd (931G) > > # cat /etc/fstab > # Custom /etc/fstab for FreeBSD embedded images > /dev/ufs/rootfs / ufs rw,noatime 1 > 1 > /dev/msdosfs/EFI /boot/efi msdosfs rw,noatime 0 > 0 > tmpfs /tmp tmpfs rw,mode=3D1777 = 0 > 0 > /dev/label/growfs_swap none swap sw 0 > 0 > md none swap sw,late,file=3D/usr/swap0= 0 > 0 > > I plan on saving the disk image onto another machine first, > re-partitioning the ssd > then copying back the freebsd part of the image. The purpose is to > eliminate growfs_swap > and the md based swap. I'm thinking partition-based swap will be quicker > even on ssd. > > Is this correct? > -- > > --00000000000005c9fa061b02d4e2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, Jun 16, 2024, 8:30=E2=80=AFAM void <void@f-m.fm> wrote:
Should the swap partition(s) be installed at the start or t= he
end of the (ssd) disk? Or does it matter? The filesystem is ufs.

Doesn't= matter, but make it at least 1mb aligned. This advice will change in the f= uture to 4 or 16mb, so it wouldn't hurt to do that now. Looks like you&= #39;ve done that.=C2=A0

= If the size of the ssd can change (new ssd disks, fancy ones, etc), the beg= inning is better.

Warner=

The partition table looks like this right now

# gpart show da0
=3D>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 63=C2=A0 1953525105=C2=A0 da0=C2=A0 MBR= =C2=A0 (932G)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A063=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1985= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0- free -=C2=A0 (993K)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A02048=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 102400=C2= =A0 =C2=A0 1=C2=A0 fat32lba=C2=A0 [active]=C2=A0 (50M)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0104448=C2=A0 1953420720=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 2=C2=A0 freebsd=C2=A0 (931G)

# cat /etc/fstab
# Custom /etc/fstab for FreeBSD embedded images
/dev/ufs/rootfs=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0ufs=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0rw,noatime=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A01
/dev/msdosfs/EFI=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 /bo= ot/efi=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0msdosfs rw,noatime=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00
tmpfs=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0/= tmp=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 tmpfs=C2=A0 =C2=A0rw,mode=3D17= 77=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 /dev/label/growfs_swap=C2=A0 none=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = swap=C2=A0 =C2=A0 sw=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00
md=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 none=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 swap=C2=A0 =C2=A0 sw,late= ,file=3D/usr/swap0 0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00

I plan on saving the disk image onto another machine first, re-partitioning= the ssd
then copying back the freebsd part of the image. The purpose is to eliminat= e growfs_swap
and the md based swap. I'm thinking partition-based swap will be quicke= r even on ssd.

Is this correct?
--

--00000000000005c9fa061b02d4e2-- From nobody Sun Jun 16 14:41:20 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4W2G1B02Y1z5NvWQ for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W2G192KWjz4DVq for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.s=20230601 header.b=As+2gkZW; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wlosh@bsdimp.com has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::529) smtp.mailfrom=wlosh@bsdimp.com Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-6e3741519d7so2508200a12.2 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 07:41:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1718548891; x=1719153691; darn=freebsd.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=l2+SsacjKpFFPS/qToHxB6s8aVYh8YLLyVBtsJbM3q0=; b=As+2gkZWd/h/W9ZzMBJc2wmebO2OQdC+0LlWwJOkQ0afFZZbII8JyeXiQE5WsCwC9S xWYntxn9SDav4ZvCnk+/AokhCWO5sdrL7CIw5xbAREYpu+NQkRGofbmtxJxw5uHeDclv 5Ff6O+nyFSaq2p1tvZ0uTosbY95kBa14hLECKVQYFkKVOj1qEYWTLkBrWxBLAsnWm33P T1Z5uMwZ3ytHdWIQZyqzQic7TQK0VbGOAdNVg0apqTR/64DWRQ5Glxhmio2UV8AGopbL 4xhQH8oCasZeXJ5Z4SLE4a/w36sLqTmaVZ8YDB9xDnGYJ1oqYJHi0zRHrzVHlKGQbqG3 q42g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718548891; x=1719153691; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=l2+SsacjKpFFPS/qToHxB6s8aVYh8YLLyVBtsJbM3q0=; b=pOQsVvrBqfYfwfKd8Cg9SklmpFl7NHUDCGIvgayleahwps40SzEM1loEa6NmUcJZcq QD1c8RrPC0+t5Dl1KVLOFsovLqjK6g1jJ2JELFp7cqApl+ZVjizj1Bh138UxqGSnMG95 OOnECK8p2J1DWpHCpVCLdRalxlTwMFKbB9dHAwsiHZX31w87jZyZ8+i47XzAdycaTqYf BWY8j2evW46x1Ql7SDxe3oF6yFTOuD80WR2iNmaa9cWfgoS750G4JjbQVkcXhWS/5az8 xvL9VK5cb+JKFK3sIb9PfSAxn4Wld4ZTHE7X05STEWn/sE/dla1OVjfxpU8E+BgzOFII nLCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyG9ks4I9IJJvoWbsiah084/t7oe+K8VWw/nuWCKpV30rVjnzXm cPiz01+/kOoANnDIEXmJ11F0dV1MxWQVzyfJcsGHRIde2chK/2eMeQrkwkA2lGjacuZSuuwO7l/ m7fbHpCbN3ChKyH5ZfPIRJxAGz17+hBjOJwJcxfWlcZgmw/DvfWk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHN1FJx9/D/bv8DHY+oihU7A0s8sIrYdXji3RJFao2zr5rcXMrABrjyWVj9a7RHbGzpMlH2maUYECla1BvCEPc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:3d89:b0:1b7:edea:e36 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1bae7ecebe1mr8189700637.22.1718548891252; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 07:41:31 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Warner Losh Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 08:41:20 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: swap at beginning or end of ssd disk? To: FreeBSD FS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000315ad2061b02d817" X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.982]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com:s=20230601]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::529:from]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4W2G192KWjz4DVq --000000000000315ad2061b02d817 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 16, 2024, 8:30=E2=80=AFAM void wrote: > Should the swap partition(s) be installed at the start or the > end of the (ssd) disk? Or does it matter? The filesystem is ufs. > > The partition table looks like this right now > > # gpart show da0 > =3D> 63 1953525105 da0 MBR (932G) > 63 1985 - free - (993K) > 2048 102400 1 fat32lba [active] (50M) > 104448 1953420720 2 freebsd (931G) > > # cat /etc/fstab > # Custom /etc/fstab for FreeBSD embedded images > /dev/ufs/rootfs / ufs rw,noatime 1 > 1 > /dev/msdosfs/EFI /boot/efi msdosfs rw,noatime 0 > 0 > tmpfs /tmp tmpfs rw,mode=3D1777 = 0 > 0 > /dev/label/growfs_swap none swap sw 0 > 0 > md none swap sw,late,file=3D/usr/swap0= 0 > 0 > > I plan on saving the disk image onto another machine first, > re-partitioning the ssd > then copying back the freebsd part of the image. The purpose is to > eliminate growfs_swap > and the md based swap. I'm thinking partition-based swap will be quicker > even on ssd. > > Is this correct? > Forgot to answer this: yes. It's a smidge faster and does not have the potential for deadlock. Warner > --000000000000315ad2061b02d817 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, Jun 16, 2024, 8:30=E2=80=AFAM void <void@f-m.fm> wrote:
Should the swap partition(s) be installed at the start or t= he
end of the (ssd) disk? Or does it matter? The filesystem is ufs.

The partition table looks like this right now

# gpart show da0
=3D>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 63=C2=A0 1953525105=C2=A0 da0=C2=A0 MBR= =C2=A0 (932G)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A063=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1985= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0- free -=C2=A0 (993K)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A02048=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 102400=C2= =A0 =C2=A0 1=C2=A0 fat32lba=C2=A0 [active]=C2=A0 (50M)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0104448=C2=A0 1953420720=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 2=C2=A0 freebsd=C2=A0 (931G)

# cat /etc/fstab
# Custom /etc/fstab for FreeBSD embedded images
/dev/ufs/rootfs=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0/=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0ufs=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0rw,noatime=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A01
/dev/msdosfs/EFI=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 /bo= ot/efi=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0msdosfs rw,noatime=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00
tmpfs=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0/= tmp=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 tmpfs=C2=A0 =C2=A0rw,mode=3D17= 77=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00 /dev/label/growfs_swap=C2=A0 none=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = swap=C2=A0 =C2=A0 sw=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00
md=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 none=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 swap=C2=A0 =C2=A0 sw,late= ,file=3D/usr/swap0 0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A00

I plan on saving the disk image onto another machine first, re-partitioning= the ssd
then copying back the freebsd part of the image. The purpose is to eliminat= e growfs_swap
and the md based swap. I'm thinking partition-based swap will be quicke= r even on ssd.

Is this correct?

Forgot to answer this: yes. It's a smidge faster and do= es not have the potential for deadlock.

Warner

<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">

--000000000000315ad2061b02d817-- From nobody Sun Jun 16 16:09:15 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4W2HyS3dvSz5P32s for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from wfhigh3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfhigh3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.154]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W2HyR4Pwkz4N6J for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm1 header.b=OUQGx49q; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=htl84XZB; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 64.147.123.154 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfhigh.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03BB1800093 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:09:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:09:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1718554157; x=1718640557; bh=eKVQDtg4Ae nMdO1lgJBGT+CzpR/Sw8Kya8Pom6bCqCs=; b=OUQGx49qGfdYllEBQFZsAh1QQ4 YMkdukcj64NA1GV8fi07oGH5g8zpBJHpAyfGPTbEWY5PqaYwpdgoDkGh5S0u5yga z9edmBjVWob9yq7tsR9NDvB0v19Z4SyF/d+0NgDmnk00iBbVS5iBAEheXxCAMcaQ MElueCFnd38d/pi3rLFZGPDDazDDu6ZLLKpPXX/lXrOpA2PT49ratM/0po8toZof 51q9LuNjUvJvxCWjD8FtWNveHUi8fVV95fCTpKoIQ3bn/TnxjBuCBnVLzjV1PT6e AB49bzYe/j4U2dnFzbbOyEqkgqye4RXYgQOYyIv8EF2VXH9LDOW3y08ym+YQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1718554157; x=1718640557; bh=eKVQDtg4AenMdO1lgJBGT+CzpR/S w8Kya8Pom6bCqCs=; b=htl84XZBs38bQEDz5uYTR0A/epPUr+EZBjqeFdZGtPtw WENLW/OJRJT3vrkRn1GIv61UkiglIQ2jrq4Zi5At+kkYgieBNfdKGIy9AcvVr4R3 NQKTbSrwkk7HGrwX1r1jjTUHiCCdvncqsnMEYEJMb430xr7ECPOBuiXba+Y2emNH GDkaIm3cZEtX+HPabMMXs+T0LsjT2JsZdtavZqDznQeidBFyBqOFKTn6mMDIIaJ2 +pJjiaY+pK3ilz2qtTOa8sMWe3kmBhAP5c5a7a/hN2MMv44yCPWM/4X10UJ777xL DZkrvqvpn0lBV9jT1Cp4O9ci1saBY/uDZXVQF7Di5Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfedvfedgleejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtre dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvhhoihguuceovhhoihgusehfqdhmrdhfmheqnecuggftrfgr thhtvghrnhepkeeluddvlefhieelfefggffhffektdehleelgfdugfdvgeekjeejuddthe ehgfeunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep vhhoihgusehfqdhmrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:09:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:09:15 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: swap at beginning or end of ssd disk? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.60 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.128/27]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.147.123.154:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29838, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4W2HyR4Pwkz4N6J On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 08:41:20AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > >Forgot to answer this: yes. It's a smidge faster and does not have the >potential for deadlock. > >Warner Awesome. Thank you for the replies -- From nobody Sun Jun 16 21:01:06 2024 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4W2QR70Vs8z5PTHQ for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W2QR65CrSz4Bsv for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1718571666; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=TWithpt+wOP48FFcp5OYzr3qi+JSFsqz3lJHIDGi8iQ8/izrv/J2CRKkbGgl79sXYtcoEK z7m4WdTq5NBGt6ZujOrKEWTHarpzjpR3evZBZd5YGP7FMBOk8MqnzUbiLW67+8v3ZO9u6w wy7BhoqfiVY81QljjXfbEGrPM2u1ThzWLpGQHohaoFunLtc3xVkjZRjEN0HG44VctrfTia ovM3evdYYJoIPfRP/oyvMN2UZQnU+SKq0xyOdXov4JPwYKeZdIcHM5gxW/sEmDa4SmBEIj 0CQkiIqXetgXEoGJ/anWDvTWy9Zwdd3X57y0DV3yn1ZFp8wUMs2JnHzaehS9Kg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1718571666; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IEKaoEIElLIb8sZTfHbBDAKeXt68sJJh75X3kdcb+uU=; b=Ou4eHiCAdkE+LSc0K+Ci5oX11IY3FdRt7OvVm5uyT3iHG1BROGrMJ9Haea89d4TfZPcXSD b31donCJsaUvVzlPzVLR/10faCpGy8JdElHXlRUDo0L+Ibi9yZ+0QoFN6s6oq1EUVaabuf 0BVMBZYnh49zizb42X5RpFLknzc8oXZtDl43x3jeowS59SksfCXhX3c+w9FxtbGTVkxQdC 8Q2zYZjPhaT+zFdArVeLzUab7XVmwD4g0xXauQ9icjes0p3O1hvVgT270BO69Dxlto6fJZ QGAKzcxQ/juJGmcvi595AyOqFTSuUHLDhxJGLqBC7vsoXDAND3cRcC69BMMSng== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W2QR64q4Bz1349 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 45GL16RG081890 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:01:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 45GL16Wg081889 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:01:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202406162101.45GL16Wg081889@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for fs@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:01:06 +0000 List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="17185716664.be66e.70896" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --17185716664.be66e.70896 Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:01:06 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 275436 | tmpfs does not honor memory limits on writes Open | 231794 | zfs: Panic due to ARC related KVA memory exhausti Open | 251035 | ZFS: Allow 64 bit ZFS to support 32 bit ioctls (W Open | 266409 | 13.1-RELEASE amd64 crashes in: sa_handle_destroy Open | 268162 | zfskeys_enable: each successful load of a key is Open | 269503 | docs.freebsd.org: default vfs.zfs.arc.meta_limit Open | 271384 | zfs_load is not suitably documented Open | 226130 | ZFS: solaris assert: zrl->zr_refcount == 0 (0x1 = 8 problems total for which you should take action. --17185716664.be66e.70896 Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:01:06 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" 
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases.

Status      |    Bug Id | Description
------------+-----------+---------------------------------------------------
In Progress |    275436 | tmpfs does not honor memory limits on writes
Open        |    231794 | zfs: Panic due to ARC related KVA memory exhausti
Open        |    251035 | ZFS: Allow 64 bit ZFS to support 32 bit ioctls (W
Open        |    266409 | 13.1-RELEASE amd64 crashes in: sa_handle_destroy 
Open        |    268162 | zfskeys_enable: each successful load of a key is 
Open        |    269503 | docs.freebsd.org: default vfs.zfs.arc.meta_limit
Open        |    271384 | zfs_load is not suitably documented
Open        |    226130 | ZFS: solaris assert: zrl->zr_refcount == 0 (0x1 =

8 problems total for which you should take action.
--17185716664.be66e.70896--