Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 05:42:16 +0100 From: Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org> To: void@f-m.fm, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: It's not Rust, it's FreeBSD (and LLVM) Message-ID: <202409090442.4894gGMb086473@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> In-Reply-To: <3845d980-7160-4819-82a4-db2281828c8c@app.fastmail.com> References: <202409031532.483FW0If007252@critter.freebsd.dk> <3845d980-7160-4819-82a4-db2281828c8c@app.fastmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
void <void@f-m.fm> wrote: > ? really? All my -stable and -current machines are recompiled from source. > Is this really that rare? Mine too (well, I only track stable at the moment, and am only talking about 8 machines) I have too many local patches to easily do it any other way. As it is, i sync src, patches are automatically applied, then make buildworld etc... is all that's needed. Similar story for ports vs packages - too many patches (and custom options)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202409090442.4894gGMb086473>