From nobody Mon Jul 8 06:17:06 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WHYnB31qCz5R4M7 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 06:17:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WHYn92vjVz40Z6 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 06:17:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it Received: from [10.1.2.18] (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.18.1/8.17.2) with ESMTPSA id 4686H6ch006954 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Jul 2024 08:17:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: <44769ec1-7523-49c7-a64d-181530c90a0d@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 08:17:06 +0200 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: OpenVPN suddenly working one way only Content-Language: en-US To: "Patrick M. Hausen" Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" References: <202407061502.466F28cR033040@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> From: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.86 X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.77 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.977]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WHYn92vjVz40Z6 On 7/6/24 18:13, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hello. >> It's almost surely due to a problem with the UDP packets that implement the VPN: again, according to tcpdump they go out host B, but never reach host A. > > Is it remotely possible that one of the ISPs blocks these UDP packets as part > of an automatic "DoS protection" mechanism? Of course I cannot exclude it with 100% confidence. That said: _ host A has about 10 VPNs, only one is misbehaving, so I guess it's not ISP A; _ host B has an enterprise-grade contract, so they should not firewall anything; another one of the above VPNs connects to a different host which has the same type of contract with the same ISP and it works. Maybe it's the ISP or someone in between... I have no control over this. I'd like to exclude any local issue, about which I might actually do something. bye & Thanks av. From nobody Mon Jul 8 06:19:35 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WHYqw1rFHz5R4MM for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 06:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WHYqv3jdDz40wb for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 06:19:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it Received: from [10.1.2.18] (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.18.1/8.17.2) with ESMTPSA id 4686JZ2Z007205 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Jul 2024 08:19:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: <10252e93-b5c0-450a-a725-51739d20b8d8@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 08:19:35 +0200 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: OpenVPN suddenly working one way only Content-Language: en-US To: Michael Tuexen , "Patrick M. Hausen" Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" References: <202407061502.466F28cR033040@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> From: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.86 X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.77 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.976]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152:c]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WHYqv3jdDz40wb On 7/6/24 18:24, Michael Tuexen wrote: > Or are any kind of NAT or Firewall involved which might loose state? > Are you using public addresses on host A and B? Host B has a public IP address assigned to its "public" interface. Host A is behind NAT (it has a private IP assigned to its public interface). However, it has about 10 VPNs and only this one misbehaves (from time to time). The again, IIUC, NAT might lose state after some time... here I see the packet going out and nothing coming in immediately afterwards. bye & Thanks av. Guess I'll need to find a way to reboot the server, next time it happens. :( From nobody Mon Jul 8 09:35:31 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WHf9w0V1Jz5Pkbs for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 09:35:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WHf9v5Sncz4K46 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1720431331; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Xrq79+cY0cnhETpp9VBeP989JLiUWaxGPGJ4kGoCkAEi/8i220t7w5QG9+SWp4KN6kEfxU MfWKooh9iym5pZw8PW1u6HDr2wlraTiAVNDNbROKypuIMdlLr9BrCEsi4205+C7nTpc3u3 X2QKZ/3bpb6GegvLSw0WWXD6520eRwp8OeLgPMZO5C4hPvfwguTtMFJYO2eK/LElINkiQD L35oWnE2je/C25V94M8KRRj6xGITYD3g4qwvEmeDLB6qe7e4DOY+e+UO9QNrgm3DVV41F7 dNnv/P8kTTs1uWfWtikSdN2Kr4RUWAe25gSsJqOfY6jQz+ZsQ9/6ARYhuJpqZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1720431331; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BXJP6K32HTUUQqhv797qJTmz7o+KNf8HOap3AgPrCDk=; b=KtQ+Tp2VMWhw3pveDM9h3EosWgwitVIUzxKs3LQltD/QQPhkm2SHxuxxAoP4WmErgG+cR9 b+a6fmo9RWdPwt4olAuXp93bNnl3hQu3jM+3Rb1liUE+IADA03gS1i3/OZIUXoMSJ6f9ah kxBIZGOXZroIZZ2xKA1fMfQo4RPX+R5eeJ9uY+P9ZsV9NroX/URkSnNXgtmQWoNe9LlCKE iPfSkefyFy/3g5iW1ATsOsLQ309pWoYZPJ7vWygCxWumy8WAWYhzMNvV5y3tb5vP8x8Kl4 ZyxE5eOdOv4JhmDEBJRzCLDSxZn2cQGQVQdlFNUO+YfA1h09R0S3i+vFsvVgSQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WHf9v4yGPzmRt for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4689ZVg3084094 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:35:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4689ZVm8084087 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:35:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280086] multicast: setsockopt(...IP_DROP_MEMBERSHIP...) doesn't lead to sending IGMP packet after base r349369 Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 09:35:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: guido@gvr.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280086 --- Comment #4 from guido@gvr.org --- I tested the test program on my system (13.3-RELEASE-p3) (tcpdump in backgr= oud while the test programs runs). As you can se there is no IGMP traffic after dropping mebership: Add membership 11:31:24.963688 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto IGMP (2), length 40, options (RA)) 192.168.1.55 > 224.0.0.22: igmp v3 report, 1 group record(s) [gaddr 239.0.0.5 to_ex, 0 source(s)] ue0: inet 192.168.1.55 igmpv3 rv 2 qi 125 qri 10 uri 3 group 239.0.0.5 mode exclude mcast-macaddr 01:00:5e:00:00:05 group 224.0.0.1 mode exclude mcast-macaddr 01:00:5e:00:00:01 Drop membership ue0: inet 192.168.1.55 igmpv3 rv 2 qi 125 qri 10 uri 3 group 224.0.0.1 mode exclude mcast-macaddr 01:00:5e:00:00:01 Add membership 11:31:28.844795 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto IGMP (2), length 40, options (RA)) 192.168.1.55 > 224.0.0.22: igmp v3 report, 1 group record(s) [gaddr 239.0.0.5 to_ex, 0 source(s)] 11:31:29.469683 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto IGMP (2), length 40, options (RA)) 192.168.1.55 > 224.0.0.22: igmp v3 report, 1 group record(s) [gaddr 239.0.0.5 to_ex, 0 source(s)] --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Mon Jul 8 12:21:18 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WHjsL1S2Hz5Q4rR for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 12:21:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dark.initr0@yandex.ru) Received: from forward500b.mail.yandex.net (forward500b.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c02:900:1:45:d181:d500]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WHjsJ4dKBz4bLL for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 12:21:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dark.initr0@yandex.ru) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yandex.ru header.s=mail header.b=gksKooRp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=yandex.ru; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dark.initr0@yandex.ru designates 2a02:6b8:c02:900:1:45:d181:d500 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dark.initr0@yandex.ru Received: from mail-nwsmtp-mxback-production-main-72.sas.yp-c.yandex.net (mail-nwsmtp-mxback-production-main-72.sas.yp-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c23:2146:0:640:63fa:0]) by forward500b.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPS id DA9CA6117A; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:21:18 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mail.yandex.ru (2a02:6b8:c23:4790:0:640:3c9b:0 [2a02:6b8:c23:4790:0:640:3c9b:0]) by mail-nwsmtp-mxback-production-main-72.sas.yp-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with HTTPS id FLb2pu27qqM0-as3eI62Q; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:21:18 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1720441278; bh=awFapSBrgY2TMW6DAP9oWxC7kVvm1Fi/pJjog3hbuOk=; h=References:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:To:From:In-Reply-To; b=gksKooRpeO5XMaYRmFoFDcXU+nYCoibXvmjSxQjus38WSLvl/1sH8Dh9VhdjFLsRl ycwlHhk4p8yNJDLLy8YDAgUvGv8p/Uq0UkJofFfLY6iEtPNjyBSJldsF4CvxL2zM7C 4KH82XPe5pr/oEUPJWDR8OvTIOZbVlrbeTiCFCCQ= Received: by ja6lqgzbqb6tniny.sas.yp-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:21:18 +0300 From: Frank Cowperwood Envelope-From: dark-initr0@yandex.ru To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: References: <202407061502.466F28cR033040@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: OpenVPN suddenly working one way only List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:21:18 +0300 Message-Id: <137831720439105@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.10 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.966]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.56)[0.559]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yandex.ru,none]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a02:6b8:c00::/40]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yandex.ru:s=mail]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2a02:6b8:c02:900:1:45:d181:d500:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yandex.ru]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:~]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yandex.ru]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:2a02:6b8::/32, country:RU]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yandex.ru:+]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yandex.ru:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WHjsJ4dKBz4bLL PGRpdj48ZGl2PjxkaXY+SGVsbG8hPC9kaXY+PGRpdj5BdCBmaXJzdCwgdHJ5IHRvIG1vbml0b3Ig SUNNUCByb3V0ZSBmcm9tIEIgdG8gQSB1c2luZyB0cmFjZXJvdXRlIHdoZW4geW91IGhhdmUgYW5k IGRvbid0IGhhdmUgcHJvYmxlbS48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pk1heWJlIGluIGNhc2Ugb2YgcHJvYmxlbSB0 cmFmZmljIGdvZXMgdGhyb3VnaHQgc29tZSByb3V0ZXIgd2hpY2ggYmxvY2tzIHBhY2tldHMgZHVl IHRvIGRvc3MgcHJvdGVjdGlvbnNcb3ZlcmxvYWRpbmcuPC9kaXY+PGRpdj7CoDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+ QWxzbywgeW91IGNhbiBzZW5kIFVEUCBwaW5nIGZyb20gQiB0byBBIHVzaW5nPC9kaXY+PGRpdj5u cGluZyAtLXVkcCAtZyBbc291cmNlX3BvcnRdIC1wIFtkZXN0X3BvcnRdIC1jIDEgLS1kYXRhLXN0 cmluZyAidGVzdCIgc2VydmVyX0EgKHdoaWNoIHBvcnRzIHRvIHVzZSB5b3UgY2FuIHNlZSBpbiB0 Y3BkdW1wKTwvZGl2PjxkaXY+dHJ5IHRvIFVEUCBwaW5nIGFuZCBjYXRjaCBwYWNrZXRzIHdoZW4g ZXZlcnl0aGluZyBpcyBPSyBhbmQgbm90IMKgPC9kaXY+PGRpdj7CoDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+SW4gYWRk aXRpb24gdG8gSUNNUCB5b3UgY2FuIHRyeSB0byB1c2UgcmVjb3JkIHJvdXRlIGluIElQIG9wdGlv bnMgKGFsdGhvdWdoIElQIGxpc3QgaXMgbGltaXRlZCnCoDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+bnBpbmcgLS11ZHAg LWcgW3NvdXJjZV9wb3J0XSAtcCBbZGVzdF9wb3J0XSAtYyAxIC0tZGF0YS1zdHJpbmcgInRlc3Qi IC0taXAtb3B0aW9ucyBSIHNlcnZlcl9BPC9kaXY+PGRpdj5hbmQgY29tcGFyZSByZXN1bHRzPC9k aXY+PGRpdj7CoDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+R29vZCBsdWNrLjwvZGl2PjwvZGl2PjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+wqA8 L2Rpdj48ZGl2PjA2LjA3LjIwMjQsIDE5OjA4LCAiQW5kcmVhIFZlbnR1cm9saSIgJmx0O21sQG5l dGZlbmNlLml0Jmd0Ozo8L2Rpdj48YmxvY2txdW90ZT48cD5PbiA3LzYvMjQgMTc6MDIsIFJvZG5l eSBXLiBHcmltZXMgd3JvdGU6PGJyIC8+wqA8L3A+PGJsb2NrcXVvdGU+wqBBcmUgeW91IHBpbmdp bmcgdGhlIGluc2lkZSBvciBvdXRzaWRlIGFkZHJlc3Mgb2YgdGhlIHZwbj88YnIgLz7CoElmIHlv dSBjYW50IGV2ZW4gcGluZyB0aGUgb3V0c2lkZSBJUCBvZiBhIFZQTiB5b3UgaGF2ZTxiciAvPsKg YmFzaWMgY29ubmVjdGl2aXR5IHByb2JsZW1zIHRoYXQgbXVzdCBiZSBmaXhlZCBiZWZvcmUgZXZl bjxiciAvPsKgYXR0ZW1wdGluZyBhIFZQTi48L2Jsb2NrcXVvdGU+PHA+PGJyIC8+SSdsbCByZWNh cDo8YnIgLz48YnIgLz5JJ3ZlIGdvdCB0d28gaG9zdHM6IEEgYW5kIEIsIHdoaWNoIGFyZSBpbiBk aWZmZXJudCBzaXRlcywgY29ubmVjdGVkIHRvPGJyIC8+dGhlIEludGVybmV0IHdpdGggZGlmZmVy ZW50IElTUHMuPGJyIC8+PGJyIC8+UGluZ2luZyBCJ3MgcHVibGljIElQIGZyb20gQSdzIHB1Ymxp YyBJUCwgYW5kIHZpY2UgdmVyc2EsIHdvcmtzLCBhcyBkb2VzPGJyIC8+YW55IG90aGVyIFRDUCBi YXNlZCBwcm90b2NvbCAoaHR0cCwgc3NoLCBldGMuLi4pOyBJIGhhdmUgbm8gVURQIGJhc2VkPGJy IC8+cHJvdG9jb2wgdG8gdGVzdCB3aXRoOyBpZiBpdCdzIG5lZWRlZCBJJ2xsIHRyeSBhbmQgc2V0 dXAgc29tZS48YnIgLz48YnIgLz5UaGVyZSdzIGFuIFVEUCBiYXNlZCBPcGVuVlBOIHR1bm5lbCBv cmlnaW5hdGluZyBmcm9tIGhvc3QgQSB0byBob3N0IEI6PGJyIC8+dXN1YWxseSBpdCB3b3JrcyBw ZXJmZWN0bHksIGJ1dCBvbmNlIGluIGEgZmV3IG1vbnRocyBpdCBzdG9wcyAoYW5kIHdpbGw8YnIg Lz51c3VhbGx5IHN0YXJ0IHdvcmtpbmcgYWdhaW4gYWZ0ZXIgc29tZSBkYXlzL3dlZWtzKS48YnIg Lz48YnIgLz5PdGhlciBzaW1pbGFyIFZQTnMsIHdoaWNoIGFyZSBwcmVzZW50IG9uIGJvdGggaG9z dHMsIGtlZXAgd29ya2luZy48YnIgLz48YnIgLz5XaGVuIHRoZSBWUE4gZG9lcyBub3Qgd29yaywg cGFja2V0cyBkbyBmbG93IGluIG9uZSBkaXJlY3Rpb24gaW5zaWRlIHRoZTxiciAvPnR1bm5lbCBm cm9tIEEgdG8gQi4gRnJvbSBCIHRvIEEsIHRoZXkgZG8gc2VlbSB0byBleGl0IHRoZSB0dW5uZWwg ZnJvbTxiciAvPmhvc3QgQiAoYWNjb3JkaW5nIHRvIHRjcGR1bXApLCBidXQgdGhleSBuZXZlciBn ZXQgdG8gaG9zdCBBLjxiciAvPjxiciAvPkl0J3Mgbm90IGFuIE1UVSBwcm9ibGVtLCBhcyBJIHRy aWVkIHBpbmcsIHdoaWNoIHVzZXMgdmVyeSBzbWFsbCBwYWNrZXRzLjxiciAvPjxiciAvPkl0J3Mg YWxtb3N0IHN1cmVseSBkdWUgdG8gYSBwcm9ibGVtIHdpdGggdGhlIFVEUCBwYWNrZXRzIHRoYXQg aW1wbGVtZW50PGJyIC8+dGhlIFZQTjogYWdhaW4sIGFjY29yZGluZyB0byB0Y3BkdW1wIHRoZXkg Z28gb3V0IGhvc3QgQiwgYnV0IG5ldmVyIHJlYWNoPGJyIC8+aG9zdCBBLjxiciAvPjxiciAvPkkg dHJpZWQgc3RvcHBpbmcgT3BlblZQTiBhbmQgc3RhcnRpbmcgaXQgYWdhaW46IEkgZ290IGluY29u c2lzdGVudDxiciAvPnJlc3VsdHMgYW5kIG5lZWQgdG8gaW52ZXN0aWdhdGUgYmV0dGVyOyBpbiBh bnkgY2FzZSBpdCBkb2Vzbid0IGhlbHAuPGJyIC8+PGJyIC8+TW92aW5nIHRoZSBWUE4gdG8gYSBk aWZmZXJlbnQgcG9ydCBvbiBob3N0IEIgYWxsb3dlZCBpdCB0byBzdGFydCB3b3JraW5nPGJyIC8+ YWdhaW4sIGJ1dCBvbmx5IGZvciBhIGZldyBob3Vycy4gQWZ0ZXIgdGhpcyB0aW1lLCB0aGUgVURQ IHBhY2tldHMgZnJvbSBCPGJyIC8+dG8gQSB3ZXJlIGdldHRpbmcgbG9zdCBhZ2Fpbi48YnIgLz48 YnIgLz5JIGNhbid0IHJlYm9vdCB0aGVzZSBob3N0cyBmcmVlbHk6IGl0IHdvdWxkIGhlbHAgdG8g Y2hlY2sgaWYgYW55IG9mIHRoZW08YnIgLz5pcyB0aGUgY3VscHJpdCBvciBpZiBpdCBjb3VsZCBi ZSBzb21lIHJvdXRlciBpbiB0aGUgbWlkZGxlLjxiciAvPjxiciAvPkkgaGF2ZSBubyBhY2Nlc3Mg dG8gYW55IHJvdXRlciBiZXR3ZWVuIEEgYW5kIEIsIGJ1dCBJJ2QgYmUgc3VwcmlzZWQgdGhleTxi ciAvPndvdWxkIGRyb3Agc3VjaCBwYWNrZXRzLjxiciAvPjxiciAvPk5vdyB0aGUgVlBOIGlzIHdv cmtpbmcsIGFnYWluIEkgZG9uJ3Qga25vdyB3aHksIHNvIEkgY2FuJ3QgY29uZHVjdCBhbnk8YnIg Lz5tb3JlIHRlc3QuPGJyIC8+SSdtIHN1cmUgaXQgd2lsbCBoYXBwZW4gYWdhaW4sIG1heWJlIGlu IGEgZmV3IG1vbnRocy48YnIgLz48YnIgLz48YnIgLz7CoMKgYnllICZhbXA7IFRoYW5rczxiciAv PsKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqBhdi48YnIgLz7CoDwvcD48L2Jsb2NrcXVvdGU+PGRpdj7CoDwvZGl2 PjxkaXY+wqA8L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pi0twqA8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PtChINCj0LLQsNC20LXQvdC40LXQvCw8 L2Rpdj48ZGl2PsKgPC9kaXY+PGRpdj7CoDwvZGl2Pg== From nobody Thu Jul 11 12:44:11 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WKZDP6DHrz5QZJh for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 12:44:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igor.ostapenko@pm.me) Received: from mail-40133.protonmail.ch (mail-40133.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WKZDN3hFTz4nQl for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 12:44:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igor.ostapenko@pm.me) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=pm.me header.s=protonmail3 header.b=ouA8RhPP; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=pm.me; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of igor.ostapenko@pm.me designates 185.70.40.133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=igor.ostapenko@pm.me DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pm.me; s=protonmail3; t=1720701858; x=1720961058; bh=dW1XWTCUGGdnsKa98vvwkX+fekjVQhy22SLqScmIZhQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=ouA8RhPPFek9C0IPjJAwsPrf7osg5SRawf7FzO4aR76ifRxgttLRCqtFTa12Ioi01 V8lqieCw1Ulw5dCX3tecm6PZLP9e/PvPyocNnJ6nO9i5MYog91dvBfvMNLt9y9JSEc Y4Pmr50K8cxPNR3XplXdHd6/z4/CRaHwJ/JXRKZHmK/FxXN+0CUeD6SQ/oDHRWyFIe LLa9FcmYECCZkVZTH750xaTuPEhUf3d+OMQvtUKSAQA2xtWFWOAlf5reKz5/MxFdr+ xeZ7Bj6OLON3PkghvZk5pS4IF8+nFWqSe9GESwlOZTPWVWE6Xj6u6CrauZyOrHGPLS ixV/cfC/opPUQ== Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 12:44:11 +0000 To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" From: Igor Ostapenko Subject: RFC: Add dummymbuf module for testing purposes Message-ID: Feedback-ID: 8300135:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 74de44792da1126e6f6284031423707f6d3b3ec4 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.20 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.997]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[pm.me,quarantine]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.70.40.0/24]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(-0.20)[185.70.40.133:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[pm.me:s=protonmail3]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.40.0/24, country:CH]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[185.70.40.133:from]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[pm.me:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WKZDN3hFTz4nQl Hi FreeBSD developers, There is a need to test firewalls for a case when the first mbuf in a chain has m_len =3D=3D 0. It comes from a real issue found recently -- a specific= mix of kernel modules reveals a defect in the firewalls' behavior. The proposal is to provide a source of non-usual mbuf chains for the testing purposes in the scope of system/e2e type of tests. The idea is straightforward -- we could put another pfil(9) user in front o= f a firewall, which would alter a mbuf chain according to the given configuration before it hits a firewall. There is a working prototype, the current design of which is as follows: - A brand new module, dummymbuf, provides special pfil hooks. Such hooks are meant to be linked manually via pfilctl(8). - Newly added "net.dummymbuf.rules" sysctl is used for configuration, which is a list of rules applied sequentially. Each rule filters a packet by PFIL type (inet, inet6, ethernet), direction (in, out), and interface. Upon matching a specified operation is applied to a mbuf chain. Currently= , there is a single operation named "pull-head", which always allocates a new cluster in front of the chain and pulls a given number of bytes. Zero bytes pulled means to create a situation with the first mbuf of zero length. Non-matching packets are passed without modification. - It's designed to fail fast by dropping a packet in case of misconfiguration or other issues. - Additionally, there is "net.dummymbuf.hits" counter sysctl revealing the number of times any rule has been applied. It's expected to be used for extra checks to lower the chances of false positives if the module has defects or is misconfigured. - This is a VNET based solution. Parallel testing should be applicable. - A quick sneak peek to get use case intuition, for an atf-sh test case: pfilctl link -i dummymbuf:inet inet sysctl net.dummymbuf.rules=3D'inet in epair0b pull-head 0;' atf_check_equal "0" "$(sysctl -n net.dummymbuf.hits)" atf_check -s exit:0 -o ignore ping -c1 192.0.2.2 atf_check_equal "1" "$(sysctl -n net.dummymbuf.hits)" It would be very appreciated to hear opinions and suggestions. There may be high level organizational questions like whether it should hit the base or should be part of the test suite only, and so on. The WIP patch: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D45928 The usage example: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D45927 Best regards, Igor. From nobody Fri Jul 12 09:09:16 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WL5Pn5hXGz5PxDj for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WL5Pn4Wv5z4QP3 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1720775357; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=U0lt+IRPXYQ93ZcKVKHTtjDwWY2Od4Er4pbHxPbLmPhpGuC5B2lWqlbN7xtcvpxslDOIb/ gLzmTNJaL0mcMK9nAD4J3eqZSR1e+VdATpIgsgGrkHMPeFiz8Fc0vrMEr3cZhC76VHEZpE HudNxI3O+R+JgjjUaYJtNaTP661vP6IOmmeZuSXXSI8chuWVEnOeqTEMASkLR8D8VFtbkD bOQL6RpaLY1dFlLyIg0PqrCpFTgZdhgfqd86/TF9HQFotMLXdIIb32pwi5NFniWvZV66zO NgR4/lOkcwLDkrctppzmheamEFvaCdU5BcPEraOl0tJjQS8H2XcwN0VCb2sJig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1720775357; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AL1KVEb773/uypmJ5pyTCK0Se9tr1uGydp5IIKsl2P8=; b=WNapgGwj6SlxOpZySU5CGvKmBFMjVLQLU4dPxv3Bc6dXzFzuT5ZV5BlMEtYhCs42PJDDbY SBfbOdbJyCc/CzeLRA8Ma92Ihu3odQM7K/LB3bQsrM4BxQqzAjEhvQ5nKr9XRLa74nX/2t qYKbykZZT99ETtfLcNoDLjxVQNJaNppZVSGcY9SKdRPrO97q0pKNM4IhoesDmcjC4LYcr/ vhcX12MxJbqlIuOh0dVNe2JoBXZHlZvEVjU0kky0ek8CVVUNtLgYTyomCN1J+b+oB7a8R6 Qb52RmmE03eAu93dMs2Yx8vUT0R/msI9zI+aAEs2pilIwzOxb7N2zgoMTKpylg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WL5Pn45l9zcyS for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46C99H3b047076 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:09:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 46C99Htj047075 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:09:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 272206] Add support for Intel GMAC Ethernet controller Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:09:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: ari@stonepile.fi X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D272206 Ari Suutari changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ari@stonepile.fi --- Comment #3 from Ari Suutari --- I have the same hardware. It would be great to see a driver happening for t= his LAN chip. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri Jul 12 17:06:04 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WLJ016ZXfz5Qq5V for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@codenetworks.net) Received: from relayout01-q02.dominioabsoluto.net (relayout01-q02.dominioabsoluto.net [217.116.26.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WLJ003bpdz4VWZ for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:06:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@codenetworks.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=codenetworks.net header.s=domabs header.b=LT8yff3h; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sm@codenetworks.net designates 217.116.26.65 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sm@codenetworks.net Received: from relayout01-redir.dominioabsoluto.net (relayout01-redir.dominioabsoluto.net [217.116.26.69]) by relayout01.dominioabsoluto.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WLHzx0LY7z3wxv for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 19:06:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codenetworks.net; s=domabs; t=1720803965; bh=G7MxgfRkdbol7oFO5GJuItOByw2ck+nexBCSDrjn83U=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:From; b=LT8yff3hYwx5khjNDhjlzY+4OY0riNAy9hILpS7m5gXAFA1QUtdJbTqOWHqprKhmt yV93evAm5B701sKpCaeG/LZJsNaqL1FrHiBG0xOAzIjGbHhdfb/rs+Lps2zG5Pptvr EP9XP81QcE5IQG5oRunipFEhfgClXsp1B+xWX1Ys= Received: from [192.168.3.20] (unknown [188.241.98.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sm.codenetworks.net) by relayout01-dsp.dominioabsoluto.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WLHzw5VMtz1xpr for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 19:06:04 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------syzCHzmL0sxiZonNychVsxOM" Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 19:06:04 +0200 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" From: Santiago Martinez Subject: Multiple Fibs and INET6 X-PostalOut-Country: IP: 188.241.98.123 | Country: ES X-PostalOut-Information: AntiSPAM and AntiVIRUS on relayout01 X-PostalOut-MsgID: 4WLHzw5VMtz1xpr.AEC83 X-PostalOut-SpamCheck: no es spam, clean X-PostalOut-From: sm@codenetworks.net X-PostalOut-Watermark: 1721408764.90778@zeW1lS4sj7TPAThvsax3Sw X-Spam-Status: No X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.72 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.932]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.20)[217.116.26.65:from,217.116.26.69:received]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.116.26.0/24]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[codenetworks.net:s=domabs]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(-0.10)[217.116.26.65:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16371, ipnet:217.116.24.0/21, country:ES]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[codenetworks.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[codenetworks.net:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WLJ003bpdz4VWZ This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------syzCHzmL0sxiZonNychVsxOM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Everyone. While adding -F ( fib as used in netstat ) to ping and ping6 I have found something that from my understanding is not correct. Please can you advise? I have the following setup : -- two fibs (0 and 1) -- two  loop-backs (lo0 and lo1). -- Lo1 has been assigned to fib1 --net.add_addr_allfibs = 0 My interface output looks like this: ifconfig lo0 | grep inet6        inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128        inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 ifconfig lo1 | grep inet6        inet6 fe80::1%lo1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 If I do a netstat -rn -6  -F0 I get the following which is was i expected. Internet6: Destination                       Gateway                       Flags     Netif Expire ::/96                             link#2                        URS         lo0 ::1                               link#2                        UHS         lo0 ::ffff:0.0.0.0/96                 link#2                        URS         lo0 fe80::%lo0/10                     link#2                        URS         lo0 fe80::%lo0/64                     link#2                        U           lo0 fe80::1%lo0                       link#2                        UHS         lo0 ff02::/16                         link#2                        URS         lo0 Now,  netstat -rn -6  -F1 shows  "fe80::1%lo0" which should not be there and "fe80::1%lo1" is missing which should be there. Internet6: Destination                       Gateway                       Flags     Netif Expire fe80::%lo1/64                     link#3                        U           lo1 *fe80::1%lo0                       link#2                        UHS         lo0* What output I was expecting was: Internet6: Destination                       Gateway                       Flags     Netif Expire fe80::%lo1/64                     link#3                        U           lo1 *fe80::1%lo1                       link#3                        UHS         lo1* This makes the ping -6 -F0 fe80::1%lo0  to work but ping -6 -F1 fe80::1%l01 to fail which I wanted to use as test case. Thanks in advance. Santiago --------------syzCHzmL0sxiZonNychVsxOM Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Everyone.

While adding -F ( fib as used in netstat ) to ping and ping6 I have found something that from my understanding is not correct.
Please can you advise?

I have the following setup :

-- two fibs (0 and 1) 
-- two  loop-backs (lo0 and lo1).
-- Lo1 has been assigned to fib1
-- net.add_addr_allfibs = 0

My interface output looks like this:

ifconfig lo0 | grep inet6
       inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
       inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2

ifconfig lo1 | grep inet6
       inet6 fe80::1%lo1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3

If I do a netstat -rn -6  -F0 I get the following which is was i expected.

Internet6:
Destination                       Gateway                       Flags     Netif Expire
::/96                             link#2                        URS         lo0
::1                               link#2                        UHS         lo0
::ffff:0.0.0.0/96                 link#2                        URS         lo0
fe80::%lo0/10                     link#2                        URS         lo0
fe80::%lo0/64                     link#2                        U           lo0
fe80::1%lo0                       link#2                        UHS         lo0
ff02::/16                         link#2                        URS         lo0

Now,  netstat -rn -6  -F1 shows  "fe80::1%lo0" which should not be there and "fe80::1%lo1" is missing which should be there.

Internet6:
Destination                       Gateway                       Flags     Netif Expire
fe80::%lo1/64                     link#3                        U           lo1
fe80::1%lo0                       link#2                        UHS         lo0

What output I was expecting was:

Internet6:
Destination                       Gateway                       Flags     Netif Expire
fe80::%lo1/64                     link#3                        U           lo1
fe80::1%lo1                       link#3                        UHS         lo1


This makes the ping -6 -F0 fe80::1%lo0  to work but ping -6 -F1 fe80::1%l01 to fail which I wanted to use as test case.

Thanks in advance.

Santiago


--------------syzCHzmL0sxiZonNychVsxOM-- From nobody Fri Jul 12 17:45:16 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WLJs84vVyz5QPGW for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WLJs83lchz4cfr for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1720806316; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Wbm8CDpoMfi6no0JwGGulx6KsRVNHDHYgJO4f4GZs2robzL5iPhyF7TqBORWXKcmzHbCx9 aNml2D5oeLHe3vwSXL6TpSVfgPzmCfSVEsM48z3plv+tRo44+gKGncO9XrXOf7Aqeu+VqQ tK4wlePpQrncy+lJunRBapgLGMDd6oKnOEMdoEM3ntL8874x3nJKKNspb1rDSxwdOV4tdi ygebjabNQKvqlZwiTYeHCnm+napaAEBU4f7ug8NYy/ghV38ob/dObSLcmqVrWP21BRs3+D VbvUX+JvfXjM6y74srY8nk4q3kRkTatglX76VU3IGjVElqEPuwwtw121xkm47g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1720806316; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Zfx2W62yNgQc6TvxBN/0ikkQs1BZC1/KjSnKzccrKVY=; b=HvcEOnkDaLP0J4wkVVMsOXUF/zxEwOA9h9NHo94h+3/YlD5KOc/m5hqXtc3gxudlje3Pd8 t2mdWli0JBk0Ij6e2lAp5qpH9KJuxjXfhXv9K5+FuVdRzGap5PMGSAZAsHvtkf2jrHFPf1 uIkeG78UlEFq7JkbUTjG8yvrPu5PZp4rDZKM4b32HS96Bx/tSlfZLjY/9nG8nMggivJYIS r65fwqCN8OFJqEd6DwuvB6dXGSISdfKLjFDvlypsziOCWcF92pZzTqWs0AR98Zx1+bSxrU wDphTYdVwYOy6E2qncVMfsCIeJzxW9/FaWIqTyfITBoLcEdlGGkLIp5Wx1Yz9w== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WLJs83MKrzsRQ for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46CHjGT3041583 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:45:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 46CHjGKF041582 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:45:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280097] Warning printed when FIBs are expanded is unhelpful and confusing Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:45:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280097 Mark Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markj@FreeBSD.org Status|New |Open --- Comment #6 from Mark Johnston --- (In reply to Zhenlei Huang from comment #4) Zhenlei, do you plan to write a patch for this? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri Jul 12 23:43:19 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WLSpZ5vxlz5R3Yl for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-f53.google.com (mail-vs1-f53.google.com [209.85.217.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WLSpY6Z5Kz4Frw for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=freebsd.org (policy=none); spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of asomers@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=asomers@gmail.com Received: by mail-vs1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-48ffceb3fdaso1061941137.0 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 16:43:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720827812; x=1721432612; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oYxhGMTbovOPTI+IjTwRY3uW7+ksgtMAQLwg9kvy3FM=; b=X9LbdxHvqeM+rOcH5+oLJT2GHhwLMlR4BaQ30bSP1IUslWQcurigXadMfk/0b2At03 d9Mb2w+QM0EEorYmQfJH+3lCet0Faxwqa0OHrodtBnYMyjDt9ur41eMdDsL1NsekWoGF vVg6Jy6wIcjHS+u69mqI8S/gwuLc1tzDm/6wbSGpE6yRm0f24fVhdKNwPAwsVoiWTI1k L+YQrJ/BiD8+0v+zzyGB00Dd30OYD9F+pEbJLRKHCtri6yLj5IqaygLHVpC3D6alVUpS jR5/f3xckWTuFfNktH9RFi5tFq9IvPXWOuWqlRLrfJ/Kty+UTXFNgCIYKs/lAKU24Q5s 402Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxvCbm//OmM8BkZycM25BglyDcQATX2nsZEag2dd19/AUDYzabp ll69BU2ah4edvbh5FB6cFpLMELaaR5o27DudbPzYKzaBRFSHFT3sZ0lKeRulfyWaMNIysQnY16q xso1qzLizA8wmAC1nMFC28XaCzTLw3Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEF+/FUuomHlZcaUhg05CTX4kqsH27qAI4lW0b3v9B7zc2WOQyeYUa9tawfZA9gRUHs0WUXzHzNepl22OUXvvk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:8012:b0:48f:eb67:9239 with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-4903220d00emr16426893137.32.1720827811711; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 16:43:31 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Alan Somers Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:43:19 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: TCP_RACK, TCP_BBR, and firewalls To: FreeBSD Net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.36 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.972]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.932]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.56)[-0.557]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[asomers@freebsd.org,asomers@gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[freebsd.org : SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM,none]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[asomers]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[asomers@freebsd.org,asomers@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.217.53:from]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.217.53:from] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WLSpY6Z5Kz4Frw I've been experimenting with RACK and BBR. In my environment, they can dramatically improve single-stream TCP performance, which is awesome. But pf interferes. I have to disable pf in order for them to work at all. Is this a known limitation? If not, I will experiment some more to determine exactly what aspect of my pf configuration is responsible. If so, can anybody suggest what changes would have to happen to make the two compatible? -Alan From nobody Sat Jul 13 00:54:44 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WLVNj0x4jz5R9QL for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:54:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WLVNh6bwZz4Mpm for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1720832084; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=bLHN0+P33/eHUv2hUGEClNAIppCPzvFbrI8ok10nJuJST0INLCbOj1SsTantGoUK3FucPl rVdY1eGbQNS4DL/JGgEslGQTGxU8kx6QKzh+heyeheu+Fn3XyMDJC1K7gLTrbX8Ib0FnbW 8WusprYQ+wcoFJQpIIaHL5lKZEKDo6QTj30YX4bHoqiCD5vLK+T6cZ1bK7Jxd6I3f8nElS Ifn+UYqxI8daT/12EZD+bPZqUzukL5xA5KzoHBwaLBsJc41Rc8hK7LNU5j4WgKnyVKOvxT 6sLApwbbbvvpuIrEm2ohhp+W4WBGoc3dKtx0l8z3nj4NWNzoRlHaVrvOgkeKTw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1720832084; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=asp0fSL++1p4CJfBFP87tZ6/1+hPZByP0/n0fsH1WyI=; b=H4aL1VoWgoQKs3Vosgxt5SUBIRQHFl+aX0P4JaiIm3AelGXYf3I6n+S715ERNd+pVdjSWG pJUagtnm9Rytyvjn+bsEWy2RH09yFbNSbR6IJmXMCbm++VcI8G9ftdelwEyQeRHMKzu7tT APxI4jQTRbc8xDCx4PyciwSHXmGe4YmkiMBtYSQUC6DGIxojsM5Be3qCHp73O9WRkQfFUz A7WXjOyZzIJRrIiNWeMbtsnnCIt6EW08MfXnWxpiCmduMv7w/QkH+mPNgzSxLyhPcU1yzt jGDzhq+RKvuHiAML6LBhDtPWbDnW8u8iDEmqi1Xg6wMQA0rDv/cAtQ9DgDLxiw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WLVNh63yMz158R for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46D0si1Y085271 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:54:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 46D0sinb085270 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:54:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280097] Warning printed when FIBs are expanded is unhelpful and confusing Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:54:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zlei@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280097 --- Comment #7 from Zhenlei Huang --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #6) That is quite simple. I can dot that at this weekend. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sat Jul 13 07:49:55 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WLgbt2wVQz5QBmx for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 07:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WLgbs47vkz54Jr; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 07:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:8958:56e7:6903:9ce1]) (Authenticated sender: micmac) by drew.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 901FC721E280D; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:49:56 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\)) Subject: Re: TCP_RACK, TCP_BBR, and firewalls From: tuexen@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:49:55 +0200 Cc: FreeBSD Net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: Alan Somers X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:193.174.0.0/15, country:DE] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WLgbs47vkz54Jr > On 13. Jul 2024, at 01:43, Alan Somers wrote: > > I've been experimenting with RACK and BBR. In my environment, they > can dramatically improve single-stream TCP performance, which is > awesome. But pf interferes. I have to disable pf in order for them > to work at all. > > Is this a known limitation? If not, I will experiment some more to > determine exactly what aspect of my pf configuration is responsible. > If so, can anybody suggest what changes would have to happen to make > the two compatible? A problem with same symptoms was already reported and fixed in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43769 Which version are you using? Best regards Michael > > -Alan > From nobody Sun Jul 14 14:36:11 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WMSZ40Mfxz5QlYq for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 14:36:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WMSZ36L0mz471t for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 14:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1720967771; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ilkwtREX3gr2cvTI6CItbdUHjsLLx1uFAuA+uXtdJ6oQLzifQ6nM2BV9oiWmuhY9NmZB38 ENwdMakkcwP6iO2NDYWyidwiIum7QJ8CT9gbM2c7E2wMFMhbRXyEejL6QbAS4tTEs0Lg3+ eOjcKlm5bCowIMzFV7sEmbP8EUKAIJWZjzHGpm+PEll5R2nsEFp6EofKoXLe/t3dm9sa5Z nuB9xVHnqAKsUTrxG1cTzWYIjlZNMQXyjcqBrGPg2dPicrBOUuAJOXa62SW5kUm2oIH7kt ahhl68RTR62RV6nBU6JU+/bzU5TYIg9cDR5SniDXY7PeZfL2IlKLpNXJ0TDAXw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1720967771; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CsiMzdPRo8N+MbRaUYRGXXTj7p+5MTvkggHVUpMLibI=; b=uRWDWpsw+1wm6TFHSosRKqXEFdlUv2c8PfWOA8uLrQNU4HDuQFyyHmH2OT2DB1KAUSYtD+ R2IPooiJq0Bn6CjHnRNLV5MszKI6YwYXNh4v6hZ2gvGaQQQfauOZ6S7PdPgkHsotMc/9GL 4WdFbJ5LSxVxIwfWa1RrYWfspBfUJHCRvMYbDJUIXIEsHiE9HXryDFut+0Wa726/su62eB Eh5DJhR3T4LbgEF4cdZfLie6f5WXfME+fuPDo05BaSZEf0sRpvgFZTL/ctfJ+rilaUtiGO HViezlKx72YUHp2M2RCfmu6mYmgMt7K768FEwr1zIuamD2WppO7JBr/dBxaBAQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WMSZ35vnkz1Ck3 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 14:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46EEaB1k014823 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 14:36:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 46EEaB7k014822 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 14:36:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280097] Warning printed when FIBs are expanded is unhelpful and confusing Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 14:36:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zlei@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_file_loc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280097 Zhenlei Huang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D45971 --- Comment #8 from Zhenlei Huang --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #6) Post to https://reviews.freebsd.org/D45971 . --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sun Jul 14 16:17:09 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WMVpb41c6z5QwN8 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WMVpb30Bmz4Ghm for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1720973831; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=exjaoAUwlb3x8fz+GxzUMrgT9Wkd6w4FUg4IEBJx3Ev8+baLrnWiK7/x5Bf0eZL7Uw9AZb 2R65DNLLr1XLH6++cDrEWxsgzxuyZtuYji9G315ZHt42FnWKEfeQboyq55lqzK/UToNjjf 9IGTyvF5B1svSMkCvQuouijla7lZVpVlpucT5FYr5IB8oJ/zRWFNZyg23nlUiNNe+5UQkK UOU/udAoDmbvSJYX+AOKpsxjHl3D4iJp45tVan+TBNDdEY+90d7tY5UU6lNQsGPyn4RA+p 7DDcVQIcWDcSMZbrM+EkDzRipDbvwv6foY5DwMvwsfugSYSA/aT4GbMyzhuV5Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1720973831; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nq4eq0jL1uc+qV2eD2TkvWCdycWdMSZ1Ou5FKd1EiaQ=; b=ltYeLGQpJoHBsW+w/5B7QOETd53o3qI93NZ0+YZYIQZBrHUDuSZkQ7sOwiOPKr0ZLWNlC4 AqKlGPlEvRJ7CUnDBPec2cyPG+872vpZyYSlWWWvLGXoryXSUJvgLEvTbn8KSK4lcn89QR 3QheKQ+F+GgHkBj4FQHbYkA5Ib298v2LlC1R8QK0BmVTESedTQ0SDKAMXxu4vDlMEHm2lM /8f72kXaEeMS/RFjsSLDAGU3UQKmTzO2oEva0kcdRJUSRFmwub73TL27pAi2iiD+gYHjav fx1clJSPfgr9LBJqoae0wtv0qRj6tarLIjCUqpoyIuFIJejEjneTI1pS4usi5A== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WMVpb2bxJzGbt for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46EGHB3O027353 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:17:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 46EGHBQW027352 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:17:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 271366] Invoking IPv6 network device address event may sleep with the following non-sleepable locks held Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:17:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D271366 Mark Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markj@FreeBSD.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|New |Closed --- Comment #4 from Mark Johnston --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 253888 *** --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sun Jul 14 16:17:09 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WMVpc5V6sz5QwN9 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WMVpc2H8lz4Ghn for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1720973832; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=dCgf7FbKSoZ1CCKvSX9eklIKLXUGh1F3vfdHX8sc33YojMjORc1vOxuOVVwVRtMK2rluYD XngDeLRgIZGOf53ZBZToeUSTJnVUXW1wmcK/iwkBESs8pQxyrMHdMoqY6ZewQj/txR8R8Y Wckkxt8hyZYVv/dVKZYgG8B4iDw9FCIhCKGdnulvXdTvzFA+95BFOeZ9G0jG++0hVl8uTD bh8r2iiulRCg5ahrl5Vn7iVRYNwPzUiyCZrBPSyRJEibUa7uwIHUK0lcYWiFDA0Nnh8rLW yY1PxzZFpK0MEXGfsZcJb31bjaDrOR7vNSLExgXkzlgB68YK7ryDK5geyIQdGQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1720973832; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5GEPevGQehoPRvt0caKc97fyAhCjgbhqgZ8iwI5+kaQ=; b=En+4vkCuFpguVHphV2S93L5EUR3LAQyWEyHv/hfj/X688ykcK4fj26H6y4ffUvSy2F4Nno OdPIEVBBtqMPHIueD0n9ibloD3GcFK9Arc/gCJQEcjNpdJbwXY+8JDcMNWmN4whv9hugLd vXIMqF65NkOreId+KoKfYnt0UcMr0zwiLxZqJW0ZASjVU6kzyH2gBrV0GfR2FePCQ4+5ev 2X94bgNx/s7EyqJ8BpIYM/r1m0daVeLstA3b8BaN47GuEtrumryZnR27Rc2HlxxltTkcVj hlxQtp8tpoKnuks0Wa6ohsxbb5fiZfSsA09lj1wYnndxkBEPBYQUkt+p4BKHmA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WMVpc1tdWzGW2 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46EGHCv1027414 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:17:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 46EGHCPm027413 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:17:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253888] exclusive sleep mutex vtnet0-rx0 (vtnet0-rx0) r = 0 (0xfffff800035d4780) locked Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 16:17:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253888 Mark Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pkubaj@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #7 from Mark Johnston --- *** Bug 271366 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Sun Jul 14 21:00:34 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WMd5Z4Cdqz5RP1h for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 21:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WMd5Z1V5fz4wBn for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 21:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1720990834; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=sYduwDqpTSnINco12TNP739WBLt4ql3dmEBLQNY3cOhTV880Nc4p1X7wLCyHSSKZPZNEP1 /ntJQDKQxKAbUs9a6hw2ZMcyvWVER3kwxdMjEeuEBuK9ghOSoOLbMDYbfSyXxjILiPehwN x5IVFAg0emhwfWcEbkNKIkhRvsHyqfeoVqTTFh1A04bEUOxGwl7KPEkyTXZtUAUdATknlt QfKUPp9DmQTmtxqwGViioGgPVNGyLzRzH1DXbubWpi71oNzRFppmaCXJxZOmfiEh6qIFcV xlM4x8QiqYz1nFiNo7c9Cyg0iTeHmXJqa6qKXLsdbELZ8Gn2mdLqLp7uCHaR1g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1720990834; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o87e/qmDl3ytW1DQgAgdr5fLGOtj3neEDI9faqOx8J8=; b=R6db9kXNEKCYT0tcWEXXIeDog11Wv3z6DNG684TAwav1qwmWcL8fA66LG2zKkSZp+z+v4G 1UsKHepSMJNdc7cZyge0CJFu3ZjfwhCtV1Kk1hkKFwJ89+yff1lLW+cKnltSEWPprRKpnI Ib+2YdsMX3xbtKi2KA1ulh1nDOXD78h5XvIwE5lOhm8JUvpfLSCu7gTJceItZ1JcHRalOm XUll0HsQR0fAI52YuUdr5TUuvxXRGpBvYNXxDr32bzTyQvEinu+I86kbbC/+nnhR+YzASL OEx2vf+VFUig+EZZO2HqcX1odO/ZPAoKEBwgWHwUJEdmZVkPxlB+8vyGRYKdnQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WMd5Z15zBzPkg for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 21:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46EL0YQ9091531 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 21:00:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 46EL0Y1v091525 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2024 21:00:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202407142100.46EL0Y1v091525@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 21:00:34 +0000 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="17209908340.9A6EdC.86902" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --17209908340.9A6EdC.86902 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 21:00:34 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- New | 254445 | cloned_interfaces="bridge0" does not respect net. Open | 166724 | if_re(4): watchdog timeout Open | 200836 | iovctl(8): Return descriptions in the returned sc Open | 223824 | Panic in ng_base.c (netgraph) Open | 232472 | ixgbe(4): SR-IOV passthru not working on Hyper-V Open | 234073 | ixl(4): Host X710-DA2 drops connect starting bhyv Open | 241106 | tun/ppp: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry Open | 245981 | bnxt(4): BCM57414 / BCM57416 not initializing: bn Open | 257038 | em(4): Panic on HTTP traffic to or from jail thro Open | 257286 | gateway with `ping -6 -e` is ignored Open | 258623 | cxgbe(4): Slow routing performance: 2 numa domain Open | 258850 | lagg(4): interface vanishes when both member inte Open | 261866 | ixgbe(4): Resets media type -> autoselect after s Open | 262024 | em(4): iflib handles bad packets incorrectly Open | 262093 | ixl(4): RX packet errors on Intel X710 after 12.2 Open | 263568 | ix(4): SR-IOV connection lost after loading VM wi In Progress | 118111 | rc: network.subr Add MAC address based interface 17 problems total for which you should take action. --17209908340.9A6EdC.86902 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 21:00:34 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" 
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases.

Status      |    Bug Id | Description
------------+-----------+---------------------------------------------------
New         |    254445 | cloned_interfaces="bridge0" does not respect net.
Open        |    166724 | if_re(4): watchdog timeout
Open        |    200836 | iovctl(8): Return descriptions in the returned sc
Open        |    223824 | Panic in ng_base.c (netgraph)
Open        |    232472 | ixgbe(4): SR-IOV passthru not working on Hyper-V 
Open        |    234073 | ixl(4): Host X710-DA2 drops connect starting bhyv
Open        |    241106 | tun/ppp: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry 
Open        |    245981 | bnxt(4): BCM57414 / BCM57416 not initializing: bn
Open        |    257038 | em(4): Panic on HTTP traffic to or from jail thro
Open        |    257286 | gateway with `ping -6 -e` is ignored
Open        |    258623 | cxgbe(4): Slow routing performance: 2 numa domain
Open        |    258850 | lagg(4): interface vanishes when both member inte
Open        |    261866 | ixgbe(4): Resets media type -> autoselect after s
Open        |    262024 | em(4): iflib handles bad packets incorrectly
Open        |    262093 | ixl(4): RX packet errors on Intel X710 after 12.2
Open        |    263568 | ix(4): SR-IOV connection lost after loading VM wi
In Progress |    118111 | rc: network.subr Add MAC address based interface 

17 problems total for which you should take action.
--17209908340.9A6EdC.86902--