From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 03:09:49 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA02812 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 03:09:49 -0700 Received: (from jkh@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA02802 for ports; Sun, 14 May 1995 03:09:46 -0700 Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 03:09:46 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Message-Id: <199505141009.DAA02802@freefall.cdrom.com> To: ports Subject: tkinfo broken Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk It doesn't It doesn't include /usr/share/info in the default path, which is where all the action is.. If you set INFOPATH, it works fine. Jordan From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 03:31:53 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA03798 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 03:31:53 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA03790 ; Sun, 14 May 1995 03:31:50 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id DAA06578; Sun, 14 May 1995 03:31:48 -0700 Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 03:31:48 -0700 Message-Id: <199505141031.DAA06578@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com CC: ports@freefall.cdrom.com In-reply-to: <199505141009.DAA02802@freefall.cdrom.com> (jkh@freefall.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: tkinfo broken From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * It doesn't It doesn't include /usr/share/info in the default path, which * is where all the action is.. If you set INFOPATH, it works fine. Ok...I fixed it. The new patch-ab is it. It doesn't find /usr/local/info/dir though, as it can use only one "dir" file at a time...oh well. :< Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 04:54:39 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA07909 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 04:54:39 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA07901 ; Sun, 14 May 1995 04:54:34 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id EAA09826; Sun, 14 May 1995 04:54:15 -0700 Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 04:54:15 -0700 Message-Id: <199505141154.EAA09826@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: ports@FreeBSD.org CC: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: frozen ports available from forgery.cs.berkeley.edu From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As promised, the checked out copy of the ports tree is now available from ftp://forgery.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/FreeBSD/ports They are provided as tarballs of individual subdirectories. These are here just to take off some load from wcarchive for a few days, and I don't indent to update them so please keep that in mind. I also request people fixing bugs in ports announce it in the "ports" list as well from now on until the release, so that non-committers can see what's changing now. The "quick upgrade kit" (for non-current users) will be available from the same directory later today (i.e., after I run "make world" on my machine). Happy testing! :) Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 06:07:05 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA10763 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 06:07:05 -0700 Received: from veda.is (root@veda.is [193.4.230.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA10755 ; Sun, 14 May 1995 06:06:43 -0700 Received: (from adam@localhost) by veda.is (8.6.8/8.6.6) id NAA08539; Sun, 14 May 1995 13:07:06 GMT From: Adam David Message-Id: <199505141307.NAA08539@veda.is> Subject: Re: dgd port package failed again To: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 13:07:06 +0000 (GMT) Cc: adam@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199505130317.UAA00847@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=" at May 12, 95 08:17:34 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 85 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Package creation now works again. Fixed for now by using a temporary PLIST. Adam D. From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 06:12:12 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA10853 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 06:12:12 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA10846 ; Sun, 14 May 1995 06:12:10 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id GAA14099; Sun, 14 May 1995 06:11:37 -0700 Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 06:11:37 -0700 Message-Id: <199505141311.GAA14099@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: adam@veda.is CC: adam@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199505141307.NAA08539@veda.is> (message from Adam David on Sun, 14 May 1995 13:07:06 +0000 (GMT)) Subject: Re: dgd port package failed again From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Package creation now works again. Fixed for now by using a temporary PLIST. Well, I'm sure you've gotten my other mail by now, but it's not working! Please stop trying to outsmart bsd.port.mk and pkg_*. You may get it to work by using "undocumented features" again, but they are changing quite rapidly as we haven't really finalized what our framework is going to be, and until that happens, having an "odd" port like this is just a pain in the neck. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 06:49:33 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA11264 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 06:49:33 -0700 Received: from veda.is (root@veda.is [193.4.230.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA11258 for ; Sun, 14 May 1995 06:49:19 -0700 Received: (from adam@localhost) by veda.is (8.6.8/8.6.6) id NAA09789; Sun, 14 May 1995 13:49:53 GMT From: Adam David Message-Id: <199505141349.NAA09789@veda.is> Subject: Re: dgd port package failed again To: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 13:49:52 +0000 (GMT) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199505141311.GAA14099@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=" at May 14, 95 06:11:37 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 973 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > * Package creation now works again. Fixed for now by using a temporary PLIST. > > Well, I'm sure you've gotten my other mail by now, but it's not > working! It works on freefall and thud with this change (and localised trees). Or is there a problem because the package gets created in the wrong destination directory? > Please stop trying to outsmart bsd.port.mk and pkg_*. The only undocumented feature currently being used in this is the way a flag to pkg_create overrides a previous occurence of the same flag... i.e. '-f foo -f bar' is equivalent to '-f bar' in this case. If you prefer, it could set PKG_ARGS= explicitly to the whole string instead of appending to ${PKG_ARGS} This workaround with a temporary PLIST is only necessary because pkg_create does not yet accept relative paths in @srcdir and @cwd commands, I have local changes to enable this but it is too late to commit them before the deadline (the changes only affect relative paths). Adam D. From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 08:22:00 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id IAA15531 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 08:22:00 -0700 Received: from aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.248]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA15525 for ; Sun, 14 May 1995 08:21:57 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id XAA03324; Sun, 14 May 1995 23:21:59 +0800 Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 23:21:58 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?= cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Hungry ViewKit and guile-ii In-Reply-To: <199505132351.QAA01039@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 13 May 1995, Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?= wrote: > > Well, ok. But I assume you just volunteered to test out the guile-ii > package, right? :) Errrmmm... what do you mean testing? Just checking to see that it compiles and installs correctly? -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 09:11:22 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA16367 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 09:11:22 -0700 Received: from aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.248]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA16361 ; Sun, 14 May 1995 09:11:15 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id AAA03438; Mon, 15 May 1995 00:11:25 +0800 Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 00:11:25 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?= cc: jkh@FreeBSD.org, mr@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pine port In-Reply-To: <199505130309.UAA00811@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 12 May 1995, Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?= wrote: > > Don't worry about Makefiles or object files (whatever that is), it > seems to compile and install ok. Object files = *.o files (I keep those around for fast rebuilds). > What are the "support files"? Things like pine.conf, the IMAP documentation, Pine tech notes, etc. Other packages include useful files too, (xv comes with graphics file format notes, Postscript documentation, etc.) which aren't installed by the Makefile. -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 11:06:26 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA18505 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 11:06:26 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA18499 ; Sun, 14 May 1995 11:06:24 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id UAA23237 ; Sun, 14 May 1995 20:06:20 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id UAA29965 ; Sun, 14 May 1995 20:06:19 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199505141806.UAA29965@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Chimera 1.65 package file in /usr/ports/distfiles has 0 length To: asami@freefall.cdrom.com, ports@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD's Ports List) Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 20:06:19 +0200 (MET DST) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD BUILT-19950501 ctm#617 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 268 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello, I just found that in /usr/ports/distfiles : -rw-rw-r-- 1 root ports 0 Apr 7 23:08 chimera-1.65.tar.gz -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995 From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 20:23:46 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id UAA12623 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 20:23:46 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA12617 for ; Sun, 14 May 1995 20:23:43 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA01029; Sun, 14 May 1995 20:23:41 -0700 Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 20:23:41 -0700 Message-Id: <199505150323.UAA01029@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: ports@FreeBSD.org CC: hackers@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU Subject: build of ports tree under way From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk (Sent to "ports" and "hackers" for wider audience -- reply only to "ports", please) I just started a full build of the ports tree on thud (fresh kernel, fresh world). /e/thud.X11R6 and /d/thud.local are renamed to X11R6.old and local.old, respectively, if you need something. The "shells" subdir is already built, so people can log in (sorry last time, Gary ;). I installed ~rich/x/*.tgz in /usr/X11R6 too. The actual command that is running (in /e/work/asami/ports) is: ## make -k package BATCH=yes DUDS="archivers japanese print russian shells smail dgd" < /dev/null > make.3 2>&1 & I'm hoping Andrey is rebuilding archivers/russian and Jean-Marc is rebuilding print. :) And I'll do japanese later. smail is taken out because it uses bash and picks up some shell functions from my environment and bombs, I'll build it later. And dgd...well, we'll deal with that later too. The packages will be (manually) copied to ftp.freebsd.org as they are rebuilt. The whole distfiles directory should already be on ftp.freebsd.org. Please test them and report any problems. Also, I'm hoping the maintainers of the interactive ports would build theirs. These are the ones that have IS_INTEACTIVE defined: === audio/xmcd comms/ecu comms/flexfax comms/mgetty+sendfax databases/msql games/xtetris japanese/Wnn japanese/mh japanese/tcl japanese/tk lang/STk lang/smalltalk mail/elm mail/procmail net/gn net/tkWWW news/trn print/dvips print/mltex print/xdvi utils/wine x11/XFree86 x11/emu x11/xgrab === Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 20:32:43 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id UAA12983 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 20:32:43 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA12631 ; Sun, 14 May 1995 20:24:03 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA01043; Sun, 14 May 1995 20:24:01 -0700 Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 20:24:01 -0700 Message-Id: <199505150324.UAA01043@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: ports@FreeBSD.org CC: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: build of ports tree under way From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk (Sent to "ports" and "hackers" for wider audience -- reply only to "ports", please) I just started a full build of the ports tree on thud (fresh kernel, fresh world). /e/thud.X11R6 and /d/thud.local are renamed to X11R6.old and local.old, respectively, if you need something. The "shells" subdir is already built, so people can log in (sorry last time, Gary ;). I installed ~rich/x/*.tgz in /usr/X11R6 too. The actual command that is running (in /e/work/asami/ports) is: ## make -k package BATCH=yes DUDS="archivers japanese print russian shells smail dgd" < /dev/null > make.3 2>&1 & I'm hoping Andrey is rebuilding archivers/russian and Jean-Marc is rebuilding print. :) And I'll do japanese later. smail is taken out because it uses bash and picks up some shell functions from my environment and bombs, I'll build it later. And dgd...well, we'll deal with that later too. The packages will be (manually) copied to ftp.freebsd.org as they are rebuilt. The whole distfiles directory should already be on ftp.freebsd.org. Please test them and report any problems. Also, I'm hoping the maintainers of the interactive ports would build theirs. These are the ones that have IS_INTEACTIVE defined: === audio/xmcd comms/ecu comms/flexfax comms/mgetty+sendfax databases/msql games/xtetris japanese/Wnn japanese/mh japanese/tcl japanese/tk lang/STk lang/smalltalk mail/elm mail/procmail net/gn net/tkWWW news/trn print/dvips print/mltex print/xdvi utils/wine x11/XFree86 x11/emu x11/xgrab === Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 21:15:26 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA13737 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 21:15:26 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA13729 ; Sun, 14 May 1995 21:15:24 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA01225; Sun, 14 May 1995 21:14:08 -0700 Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 21:14:08 -0700 Message-Id: <199505150414.VAA01225@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw CC: jkh@FreeBSD.org, mr@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (message from Brian Tao on Mon, 15 May 1995 00:11:25 +0800 (CST)) Subject: Re: pine port From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * > Don't worry about Makefiles or object files (whatever that is), it * > seems to compile and install ok. * * Object files = *.o files (I keep those around for fast rebuilds). No, don't install these...they will be in the work/ subdirectory until the user types "make clean". * > What are the "support files"? * * Things like pine.conf, the IMAP documentation, Pine tech notes, * etc. Other packages include useful files too, (xv comes with graphics * file format notes, Postscript documentation, etc.) which aren't * installed by the Makefile. I see. You don't *need* to worry about anything that's not installed by the original Makefile (unless it's clearly an oversight on the original author's part), but of course it will be nice if you can install them as well. (Use the post-install target for these things.) Anyway, right now time is kinda limited. Can you just make the three necessary pkg/* files, that would be good enough. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 21:45:39 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA15753 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 21:45:39 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA15745 for ; Sun, 14 May 1995 21:45:37 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA01331; Sun, 14 May 1995 21:45:30 -0700 Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 21:45:30 -0700 Message-Id: <199505150445.VAA01331@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr CC: ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199505141806.UAA29965@blaise.ibp.fr> (roberto@blaise.ibp.fr) Subject: Re: Chimera 1.65 package file in /usr/ports/distfiles has 0 length From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * -rw-rw-r-- 1 root ports 0 Apr 7 23:08 chimera-1.65.tar.gz Thanks..../usr/ports/{distfiles,packages} of freefall is out of date, please use the one on thud. I copied the correct one to wcarchive. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 23:11:00 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA18311 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 23:11:00 -0700 Received: from calweb.calweb.com (calweb.calweb.com [165.90.138.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA18297 for ; Sun, 14 May 1995 23:10:45 -0700 Received: from web1 by calweb.calweb.com via ESMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.AUTO) for id XAA28778; Sun, 14 May 1995 23:14:28 -0700 From: dlangley@calweb.com (Doug Langley) Received: (dlangley@localhost) by web1 (8.6.9/8.6.9) id XAA08882 for ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 May 1995 23:14:27 -0700 Message-Id: <199505150614.XAA08882@web1> Subject: new packages To: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 23:14:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 382 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Whenever we try to install any of the new packages from the new packages subdirectory, were getting an invalid option error from mtree. Any idea whats causing this or how to fix it? Were running the 0412 and 0322 snaps on 2 seperate machines and its still failing. I also just tried grabbing new mtree sources but this didnt seem to help at all. Any help would be appreciated. From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 14 23:27:05 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA18550 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 23:27:05 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA18544 for ; Sun, 14 May 1995 23:27:03 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id XAA01604; Sun, 14 May 1995 23:26:52 -0700 Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 23:26:52 -0700 Message-Id: <199505150626.XAA01604@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: dlangley@calweb.com CC: ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199505150614.XAA08882@web1> (dlangley@calweb.com) Subject: Re: new packages From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Whenever we try to install any of the new packages from the new packages * subdirectory, were getting an invalid option error from mtree. Any idea * whats causing this or how to fix it? * Were running the 0412 and 0322 snaps on 2 seperate machines and its still * failing. I also just tried grabbing new mtree sources but this didnt seem * to help at all. pkg_add and mtree don't agree with each other, I guess. It will be great if you can upgrade to -current (shouldn't be too hard if you already have 0412 and some diskspace) and test them out. Alternately, you can grab ftp://forgery.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/FreeBSD/ports/kit.tar.gz and see how it goes. No guarantees, though. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 15 02:38:33 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA23750 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 15 May 1995 02:38:33 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA23742 for ; Mon, 15 May 1995 02:38:30 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id CAA02156; Mon, 15 May 1995 02:38:27 -0700 Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 02:38:27 -0700 Message-Id: <199505150938.CAA02156@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Forwarded mail From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I assume this was meant for a wider audience...since you say "anyone?" down there. :) Satoshi ------- To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | 浅見 賢) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/g77 Makefile Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 02:18:26 -0700 From: Joshua Peck Macdonald > * Why would we -ever- want to move it into the src tree? That makes > * it FAR more difficult to keep current and bloats the source > * distribution for something 103 out of every 100 users will never > * use. > > I agree -- Fortran compilers belong to the ports section. Not that > everything else in the core distribution is used more than f77/g77 but > it's probably one of the least used items and isn't that hard to > separate. Actually, f77 and f2c would be very easy to remove from the core distribution. In fact I think something far more organized could be done with the gcc executable which installs by default. One problem is that for fortran compilers at least is that you need to really tell gcc which you want to use, whether to use the f2c | cc1 or the g77 | f771 combintion. I don't know how you can make this distinction in the same executable, though I'm sure its possible, but not desirable. As it stands, gcc has a rule telling it to use f2c for .f files, this has to be removed to use g77. When I was fixing the gnat port, I couldn't even modify a gcc driver to look in the right place, because there really isn't any gnat changes (except that it should find gnat1 wherever you install it--it already has ada rules). So fine, what I think could be done rather easily and I'd be willing to help after finals is patch up gcc.c a little, remove /usr/bin/f2c and /usr/bin/f77 from the source tree and make a port of them. I don't know if anything needs libf2c in the core distribution, does anything? The ports that use the gcc sources could also be a bit more organized, like gnat, but I don't have much interest in gnat, and f77 and g77 both work for me right now, so what does everyone else think? I was also thinking about trying to get GNU objc to work... cause I ran across some sources I could't compile, does anyone know if it compiles? -josh > The only problem is that the current gcc driver in /usr/bin only looks > into /usr/libexec to find the compiler propers (cc1, gnat1, etc.) > unless told otherwise. This has caused headaches to some people > recently (most notably Nils, Jeff and Josh :). > > If there is a clean way to solve this, it would be great. > > Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 15 03:04:28 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA24538 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 15 May 1995 03:04:28 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA24529 ; Mon, 15 May 1995 03:04:20 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id DAA02245; Mon, 15 May 1995 03:04:17 -0700 Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 03:04:17 -0700 Message-Id: <199505151004.DAA02245@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: Joshua Peck Macdonald CC: ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199505150938.CAA02156@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> (asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU) Subject: f77/g77 From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Now, to reply to your post.... :) * install it--it already has ada rules). So fine, what I think * could be done rather easily and I'd be willing to help after finals * is patch up gcc.c a little, remove /usr/bin/f2c and /usr/bin/f77 from * the source tree and make a port of them. I don't know if anything * needs libf2c in the core distribution, does anything? The ports that Yes, I think that's a good idea, of course I need to ask "core" and the other maintainers about this first but in general I'm in favor of pulling out non-essential components into ports. Well, for f77 and g77, we have a problem of both eating .f files so as you said, I guess we'd just install the driver in /usr/local/bin and the compilers in /usr/local/libexec as we are doing now. For gnat, it might help if we can make the system gcc.c look into /usr/local/libexec as well as /usr/libexec, right? Or maybe it's better if we install a shell script in /usr/local/bin that calls the system gcc with the correct arguments ("-B/usr/local/libexec"?), does it need to look into libraries and stuff in /usr/local as well? Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 15 05:42:02 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA29381 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 15 May 1995 05:42:02 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA29375 for ; Mon, 15 May 1995 05:41:59 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id FAA02701; Mon, 15 May 1995 05:40:59 -0700 Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 05:40:59 -0700 Message-Id: <199505151240.FAA02701@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: adam@veda.is CC: ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199505141349.NAA09789@veda.is> (message from Adam David on Sun, 14 May 1995 13:49:52 +0000 (GMT)) Subject: Re: dgd port package failed again From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * It works on freefall and thud with this change (and localised trees). * Or is there a problem because the package gets created in the wrong * destination directory? Huh? I thought you saw my message, it just bombs right away. That was on thud, on a freshly checked-out copy, on my home directory. Anyway, I came up with a brilliant idea -- can you build this package by yourself? Then you can experiment with all your great hacks, while I can maintain my sanity and time to look over the other ports. Deal? Please put the package and links in /usr/ports/packages on thud, well if you use the default packaging rules, they will go there anyway (and if you changed the packaging rules so much that doesn't happen...well it's your responsibility to set up the links correctly :). Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 15 08:21:52 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id IAA04492 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 15 May 1995 08:21:52 -0700 Received: from veda.is (root@veda.is [193.4.230.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA04481 for ; Mon, 15 May 1995 08:20:52 -0700 Received: (from adam@localhost) by veda.is (8.6.8/8.6.6) id PAA28400 for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 May 1995 15:22:07 GMT From: Adam David Message-Id: <199505151522.PAA28400@veda.is> Subject: package creation without install To: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 15:22:05 +0000 (GMT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 1234 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk It has occured to me that it would be useful to have generalised support for creating packages without actually installing the port on the machine where the package build is taking place. Reasons for needing this support are as follows: 1) The port might already be installed on the package-build machine. The installed version might differ from the version being built, or default configuration and library files might have been changed or added to since installation. 2) The intention might not be to install the port on the package-build machine at all, but only to generate a port for installing on another machine. Here are some reasons why people other than original porters or release engineers might be building packages: 1) An "interactive" port is being built for a specific target machine which is not equipped to build ports. 2) A port modified from its standard form is being built for a (some) target machine(s). Having a generalised mechanism would dispose of complications arising with various ports each implementing the functionality in their own way. It could be controlled by an environment variable, to determine the method to use when building the package. Thoughts, anyone? -- Adam David From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 15 09:38:29 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA06358 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 15 May 1995 09:38:29 -0700 Received: from eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (root@eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.42.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id JAA06343 for ; Mon, 15 May 1995 09:38:16 -0700 Received: from vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.142.36]) by eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP id <43059>; Mon, 15 May 1995 18:37:53 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA17106; Sun, 14 May 1995 22:30:45 +0200 Message-Id: <199505142030.WAA17106@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> X-Authentication-Warning: vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hylafax In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 May 1995 04:47:00 +0200." <199505130247.TAA00741@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 22:30:45 +0200 From: Julian Howard Stacey Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Can someone take a look into this? flexfax is now supposedly called > hylafax and compiles without patches. > If you can get it to work, go ahead and import it as "hylafax". We > can delete flexfax later. It compiles ok, but there are permission problems, I had assumed I couldnt commit as the freeze was on, norw I realise that's src only as always, so I'll try to do it RSN. Julian S From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 15 09:59:20 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA07206 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 15 May 1995 09:59:20 -0700 Received: from leo.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.249]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA07197 for ; Mon, 15 May 1995 09:59:11 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by leo.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id AAA00488; Mon, 16 May 1994 00:57:57 +0800 Date: Mon, 16 May 1994 00:57:57 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pine port In-Reply-To: <199505150414.VAA01225@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 14 May 1995, Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?= wrote: > > No, don't install these...they will be in the work/ subdirectory until > the user types "make clean". No, I won't... I just mentioned that as an aside (the way I tar up work directories after I'm done building). > I see. You don't *need* to worry about anything that's not installed > by the original Makefile (unless it's clearly an oversight on the > original author's part), but of course it will be nice if you can > install them as well. (Use the post-install target for these things.) Unfortunately, Pine does not (AFAIK) come with an "install" target in its Makefiles. :( So I did my best and made a package that consists of the following: % tar -zxvvf pine-3.91.tar.gz drwxr-xr-x root/bin 0 May 16 00:54 1995 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/wheel 0 May 16 00:33 1995 bin/ -rwxr-xr-x root/wheel 970752 May 16 00:33 1995 bin/pine -rwxr-xr-x root/wheel 118784 May 16 00:33 1995 bin/pico -rwxr-xr-x root/wheel 266240 May 16 00:33 1995 bin/imapd drwxr-xr-x root/wheel 0 May 16 00:34 1995 lib/ drwxr-xr-x root/wheel 0 May 16 00:51 1995 lib/pine/ -rw-r--r-- root/wheel 5148 May 16 00:34 1995 lib/pine/pine.conf -rw-r--r-- root/wheel 3457 May 16 00:47 1995 lib/pine/brochure.txt -rw-r--r-- root/wheel 183 May 16 00:51 1995 lib/pine/README -rw-r--r-- root/wheel 6791 May 16 00:47 1995 lib/pine/mailcap.unx -rw-r--r-- root/wheel 11792 May 16 00:47 1995 lib/pine/imap.vs.pop -rw-r--r-- root/wheel 219421 May 16 00:47 1995 lib/pine/tech-notes.txt drwxr-xr-x root/wheel 0 May 16 00:08 1995 man/ drwxr-xr-x root/wheel 0 May 16 00:43 1995 man/man1/ -rw-r--r-- root/wheel 2321 May 16 00:33 1995 man/man1/pico.1.gz -rw-r--r-- root/wheel 3866 May 16 00:33 1995 man/man1/pine.1.gz -rw-r--r-- root/bin 49 May 16 00:54 1995 +COMMENT -rw-r--r-- root/bin 392 May 16 00:54 1995 +DESC -rw-r--r-- root/bin 132 May 16 00:54 1995 +CONTENTS The first time I created the tarball, I gave pkg_create "pine-3.91" as the name (thinking it would add an appropriate filename extension). It doesn't though, and it forgets to gzip the resulting tar file (even though it says "Creating gzip'd tar ball in '/usr/local/src/pine3.91/inst/pine-3.91'". Bug? > Anyway, right now time is kinda limited. Can you just make the three > necessary pkg/* files, that would be good enough. Where should I send it? -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 15 15:25:00 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA18438 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 15 May 1995 15:25:00 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id PAA18428 ; Mon, 15 May 1995 15:24:59 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Adam David cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: package creation without install In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 May 95 15:22:05 -0000." <199505151522.PAA28400@veda.is> Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 15:24:59 -0700 Message-ID: <18426.800576699@freefall.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > It has occured to me that it would be useful to have generalised support > for creating packages without actually installing the port on the machine > where the package build is taking place. Reasons for needing this support > are as follows: Sure. The only question is: How? Jordan From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 15 16:07:23 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA19681 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 15 May 1995 16:07:23 -0700 Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA19674 for ; Mon, 15 May 1995 16:07:21 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA07514; Mon, 15 May 1995 16:07:13 -0700 Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 16:07:13 -0700 Message-Id: <199505152307.QAA07514@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de CC: ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199505142030.WAA17106@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> (message from Julian Howard Stacey on Sun, 14 May 1995 22:30:45 +0200) Subject: Re: hylafax From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * It compiles ok, but there are permission problems, * I had assumed I couldnt commit as the freeze was on, norw I realise * that's src only as always, so I'll try to do it RSN. Well the ports tree is in "freeze" mode too, but this is one thing we really want to get in to 2.0.5 so please commit it ASAP, and I'll build it separately. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 15 17:28:15 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA22178 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 15 May 1995 17:28:15 -0700 Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA22172 for ; Mon, 15 May 1995 17:28:14 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA07604; Mon, 15 May 1995 17:27:11 -0700 Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 17:27:11 -0700 Message-Id: <199505160027.RAA07604@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw CC: ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (message from Brian Tao on Mon, 16 May 1994 00:57:57 +0800 (CST)) Subject: Re: pine port From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Unfortunately, Pine does not (AFAIK) come with an "install" target * in its Makefiles. :( So I did my best and made a package that * consists of the following: Hmm, that's strange, I thought it came with one. Oh well. * > Anyway, right now time is kinda limited. Can you just make the three * > necessary pkg/* files, that would be good enough. * * Where should I send it? You can tar them up and leave them on your home directory on time, I'll go grab it and see how it works in our ports tree. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 16 03:49:56 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA06469 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 16 May 1995 03:49:56 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA06463 ; Tue, 16 May 1995 03:49:51 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id DAA05284; Tue, 16 May 1995 03:49:49 -0700 Date: Tue, 16 May 1995 03:49:49 -0700 Message-Id: <199505161049.DAA05284@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: hsu@FreeBSD.org CC: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Sather port missing pkg files From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Can someone write pkg files for this? Thanks Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 16 13:48:31 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA20064 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 16 May 1995 13:48:31 -0700 Received: from grunt.grondar.za (grunt.grondar.za [196.7.18.129]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA20049 ; Tue, 16 May 1995 13:47:56 -0700 Received: from grumble.grondar.za (grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by grunt.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA01584; Tue, 16 May 1995 22:47:20 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA17633; Tue, 16 May 1995 22:47:20 +0200 Message-Id: <199505162047.WAA17633@grumble.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grumble.grondar.za: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: ports@FreeBSD.org, bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Late fix for XFree86 port Date: Tue, 16 May 1995 22:47:19 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi I did not want to abuse my recently acquired commit powers, so here is a fix for XFree86 as set in ports/x11/XFree86. The problem was that if Xfree86 is not installed on your system, a bit of source code that is compiled and linked off your O'Reilly and Associates CDROM will not compile because of a lack of some X Header files. This patch points gcc in the right direction (on the CDROM) for long enough to make it work. The code concerned generates the link farm that is eventually patched and compiled to make Xfree. ----------------------8<-----------Patch relative to ports/x11------- diff -cdPr XFree86/scripts/configure XFree86.MM/scripts/configure *** XFree86.MM/scripts/configure Tue May 16 20:53:20 1995 --- XFree86/scripts/configure Tue May 16 22:35:56 1995 *************** *** 36,42 **** fi echo "==> building the tree (please wait)" if [ -f ${WRKDIR}/.cd_OR ] ; then ! (cd $WRKDIR; cp $X11R6/xc/config/util/lndir.c .; cc -o lndir lndir.c; mkdir ./xc; ./lndir $X11R6/xc ./xc) fi if [ -f ${WRKDIR}/.cd_X ] ; then (cd $WRKDIR; sh $FILESDIR/maketree $X11R6) --- 36,42 ---- fi echo "==> building the tree (please wait)" if [ -f ${WRKDIR}/.cd_OR ] ; then ! (cd $WRKDIR; cp $X11R6/xc/config/util/lndir.c .;ln -s $X11R6/xc/include X11; cc -o lndir -I. lndir.c; mkdir ./xc; ./lndir $X11R6/xc ./xc) fi if [ -f ${WRKDIR}/.cd_X ] ; then (cd $WRKDIR; sh $FILESDIR/maketree $X11R6) ----------------------8<-----------Patch relative to ports/x11------- -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 16 14:18:06 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA20959 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 16 May 1995 14:18:06 -0700 Received: from cabri.obs-besancon.fr (cabri.obs-besancon.fr [193.52.184.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id OAA20949 ; Tue, 16 May 1995 14:18:03 -0700 Received: by cabri.obs-besancon.fr (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA27553; Tue, 16 May 95 23:17:28 +0100 Date: Tue, 16 May 95 23:17:28 +0100 From: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr (Jean-Marc Zucconi) Message-Id: <9505162217.AA27553@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> To: mark@grondar.za Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, bugs@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199505162047.WAA17633@grumble.grondar.za> (message from Mark Murray on Tue, 16 May 1995 22:47:19 +0200) Subject: Re: Late fix for XFree86 port X-Mailer: Emacs Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Murray writes: > Hi > I did not want to abuse my recently acquired commit powers, so here is > a fix for XFree86 as set in ports/x11/XFree86. The problem was that > if Xfree86 is not installed on your system, a bit of source code > that is compiled and linked off your O'Reilly and Associates CDROM > will not compile because of a lack of some X Header files. This patch > points gcc in the right direction (on the CDROM) for long enough to > make it work. The code concerned generates the link farm that > is eventually patched and compiled to make Xfree. There is no need to compile lndir in this case - look 3 lines below your long line how I did it!!! You should have used my script from the begining... > ----------------------8<-----------Patch relative to ports/x11------- > diff -cdPr XFree86/scripts/configure XFree86.MM/scripts/configure > *** XFree86.MM/scripts/configure Tue May 16 20:53:20 1995 > --- XFree86/scripts/configure Tue May 16 22:35:56 1995 > *************** > *** 36,42 **** > fi > echo "==> building the tree (please wait)" > if [ -f ${WRKDIR}/.cd_OR ] ; then > ! (cd $WRKDIR; cp $X11R6/xc/config/util/lndir.c .; cc -o lndir lndir.c; mkdir ./xc; ./lndir $X11R6/xc ./xc) > fi > if [ -f ${WRKDIR}/.cd_X ] ; then > (cd $WRKDIR; sh $FILESDIR/maketree $X11R6) Jean-Marc. _____________________________________________________________________________ Jean-Marc Zucconi Observatoire de Besancon F 25010 Besancon cedex PGP Key: finger jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr ============================================================================= From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 16 23:33:25 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA23635 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 16 May 1995 23:33:25 -0700 Received: from grunt.grondar.za (grunt.grondar.za [196.7.18.129]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA23621 ; Tue, 16 May 1995 23:32:58 -0700 Received: from grumble.grondar.za (grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by grunt.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA02147; Wed, 17 May 1995 08:32:32 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA23386; Wed, 17 May 1995 08:32:31 +0200 Message-Id: <199505170632.IAA23386@grumble.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grumble.grondar.za: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr (Jean-Marc Zucconi) cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Late fix for XFree86 port Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 08:32:30 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > There is no need to compile lndir in this case - look 3 lines below your > long line how I did it!!! You should have used my script from the > begining... How true. There is a patch at the end of this that backs out _all_ my crap. If this is OK, could you please apply it? (And while you are about it please pass the silly hat and hurl a convenient custard pie?) ----------------------8<-----------Patch relative to ports/x11------- diff -cdPr XFree86.MM/Makefile XFree86/Makefile *** XFree86.MM/Makefile Tue May 16 20:55:31 1995 --- XFree86/Makefile Wed May 17 08:21:35 1995 *************** *** 12,21 **** # # ####################################################################### # ! # uncomment one of the 3 lines below! ! #(X-Consortium CDROM, O'Reilly 'X-Companion' CDROM, or X by FTP (_*BIG*_) ! #X11_ON_X_CDROM = yes ! #X11_ON_OR_CDROM = yes #X11_VIA_FTP = yes #if you are compiling from a cdrom, set the directory where the --- 12,20 ---- # # ####################################################################### # ! # uncomment one of the 2 lines below! ! #(X-Consortium CDROM/O'Reilly 'X-Companion' CDROM, or X by FTP (_*BIG*_) ! #X11_ON_CDROM = yes #X11_VIA_FTP = yes #if you are compiling from a cdrom, set the directory where the *************** *** 35,44 **** MAINTAINER= jmz@FreeBSD.ORG - .if defined(X11_ON_X_CDROM) || defined(X11_ON_OR_CDROM) - X11_ON_CDROM = yes - .endif - .if defined(X11_ON_CDROM) || defined(X11_VIA_FTP) do-build: --- 34,39 ---- *************** *** 70,87 **** @mkdir -p ${WRKDIR} @echo ${X11FIXES} > ${WRKDIR}/.cdrom @${TOUCH} ${TOUCH_FLAGS} ${EXTRACT_COOKIE} - .if defined(X11_ON_X_CDROM) - ${TOUCH} ${TOUCH_FLAGS} ${WRKDIR}/.cd_X - .endif - .if defined(X11_ON_OR_CDROM) - ${TOUCH} ${TOUCH_FLAGS} ${WRKDIR}/.cd_OR - .endif .elif defined(X11_VIA_FTP) .include "Makefile.ftp" .else do-fetch: ! @echo Please set one of the 3 variables X11_ON_X_CDROM, X11_ON_OR_CDROM, or X11_VIA_FTP @echo before building ${PKGNAME} @false do-extract: --- 65,76 ---- @mkdir -p ${WRKDIR} @echo ${X11FIXES} > ${WRKDIR}/.cdrom @${TOUCH} ${TOUCH_FLAGS} ${EXTRACT_COOKIE} .elif defined(X11_VIA_FTP) .include "Makefile.ftp" .else do-fetch: ! @echo Please set one of the 2 variables X11_ON_CDROM or X11_VIA_FTP @echo before building ${PKGNAME} @false do-extract: *************** *** 89,95 **** do-configure: @echo -n do-build: ! @echo Please set one of the 3 variables X11_ON_X_CDROM, X11_ON_OR_CDROM, or X11_VIA_FTP @echo before building ${PKGNAME} @false do-install: --- 78,84 ---- do-configure: @echo -n do-build: ! @echo Please set one of the 2 variables X11_ON_CDROM, or X11_VIA_FTP @echo before building ${PKGNAME} @false do-install: Only in XFree86: makefile diff -cdPr XFree86/scripts/configure XFree86.MM/scripts/configure *** XFree86/scripts/configure Tue May 16 20:53:20 1995 --- XFree86.MM/scripts/configure Wed May 17 08:22:48 1995 *************** *** 35,46 **** pl=01 fi echo "==> building the tree (please wait)" ! if [ -f ${WRKDIR}/.cd_OR ] ; then ! (cd $WRKDIR; cp $X11R6/xc/config/util/lndir.c .; cc -o lndir lndir.c; mkdir ./xc; ./lndir $X11R6/xc ./xc) ! fi ! if [ -f ${WRKDIR}/.cd_X ] ; then ! (cd $WRKDIR; sh $FILESDIR/maketree $X11R6) ! fi else X11FIXES=`cat $WRKDIR/.ftp` pl=12 --- 35,41 ---- pl=01 fi echo "==> building the tree (please wait)" ! (cd $WRKDIR; sh $FILESDIR/maketree $X11R6) else X11FIXES=`cat $WRKDIR/.ftp` pl=12 ----------------------8<-----------Patch relative to ports/x11------- -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 00:55:40 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA27249 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 00:55:40 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA27243 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 00:55:38 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id AAA08812; Wed, 17 May 1995 00:54:45 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 00:54:45 -0700 Message-Id: <199505170754.AAA08812@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: mark@grondar.za CC: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr, ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199505170632.IAA23386@grumble.grondar.za> (message from Mark Murray on Wed, 17 May 1995 08:32:30 +0200) Subject: Re: Late fix for XFree86 port From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * How true. There is a patch at the end of this that backs out _all_ my * crap. If this is OK, could you please apply it? People, we are in code freeze now! Unless it's a bug fix, please don't touch the ports tree! Also, I've done a lot of testing on the XFree86 port (well only the ftp stuff though), it takes hours to build and I'm not happy to get it changed at this point anyway, we have no more time to test it. However, if you are saying that the CDROM stuff is completely broken, well then that's a different story. I'll trust Jean-Marc's judgement, so Jean-Marc, go ahead and change it if you think it's correct. But please make sure you don't touch the ftp stuff, that part was working.... * (And while you are about it please pass the silly hat and hurl a * convenient custard pie?) Who has it now? *-<:) Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 02:04:25 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA04405 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 02:04:25 -0700 Received: from grunt.grondar.za (grunt.grondar.za [196.7.18.129]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA04358 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 02:04:02 -0700 Received: from grumble.grondar.za (grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by grunt.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA02277; Wed, 17 May 1995 11:03:31 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA27901; Wed, 17 May 1995 11:03:20 +0200 Message-Id: <199505170903.LAA27901@grumble.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grumble.grondar.za: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) cc: mark@grondar.za, jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Late fix for XFree86 port Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 11:03:20 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > * How true. There is a patch at the end of this that backs out _all_ my > * crap. If this is OK, could you please apply it? > > People, we are in code freeze now! Unless it's a bug fix, please > don't touch the ports tree! I know. That is why I am post ing and not committing. I need the guidance of those wiser than me... > However, if you are saying that the CDROM stuff is completely broken, > well then that's a different story. I'll trust Jean-Marc's judgement, > so Jean-Marc, go ahead and change it if you think it's correct. But > please make sure you don't touch the ftp stuff, that part was > working.... This does not touch the ftp stuff, and the CDROM stuff for an O'Reilly CDROM is broken if you do not have X installed already, so this is a pure CDROM bug fix. It is also a good code clean-up. > * (And while you are about it please pass the silly hat and hurl a > * convenient custard pie?) > > Who has it now? *-<:) Dunno abount the hat, but I'm prepared to make the pie myself... -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 02:26:51 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA05702 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 02:26:51 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA05696 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 02:26:48 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id CAA09057; Wed, 17 May 1995 02:26:06 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 02:26:06 -0700 Message-Id: <199505170926.CAA09057@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: mark@grondar.za CC: mark@grondar.za, jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr, ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199505170903.LAA27901@grumble.grondar.za> (message from Mark Murray on Wed, 17 May 1995 11:03:20 +0200) Subject: Re: Late fix for XFree86 port From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * I know. That is why I am post ing and not committing. I need the guidance * of those wiser than me... = jmz....? :) * * This does not touch the ftp stuff, and the CDROM stuff for an O'Reilly * CDROM is broken if you do not have X installed already, so this is a * pure CDROM bug fix. It is also a good code clean-up. Okay, then it's fine. Sorry for yelling at you. :> * Dunno abount the hat, but I'm prepared to make the pie myself... I have a lemon meringue in my fridge, I can throw that in your face if you want. :) Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 04:32:14 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA00831 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 04:32:14 -0700 Received: from veda.is (root@veda.is [193.4.230.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA00816 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 04:31:34 -0700 Received: (from adam@localhost) by veda.is (8.6.8/8.6.6) id LAA08213 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 May 1995 11:34:02 GMT From: Adam David Message-Id: <199505171134.LAA08213@veda.is> Subject: popper To: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 11:34:00 +0000 (GMT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 358 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The popper port refers to a non-existent file on the master site. These are the source archives available from ftp.qualcomm.com: -rw-rw-r-- 1 732 eudora 90059 Dec 17 00:44 qpop2.1.3-r5.tar.Z -rw-rw-r-- 1 732 eudora 103301 Mar 3 00:55 qpop2.1.4-r1.tar.Z Where did qpop2.1.4-r2.tar.Z come from? What now? -- Adam David From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 05:04:18 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA01303 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 05:04:18 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA01297 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 05:04:14 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id FAA09540; Wed, 17 May 1995 05:03:41 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 05:03:41 -0700 Message-Id: <199505171203.FAA09540@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: adam@veda.is CC: ports@FreeBSD.org, fn@trinity.radio-do.de In-reply-to: <199505171134.LAA08213@veda.is> (message from Adam David on Wed, 17 May 1995 11:34:00 +0000 (GMT)) Subject: Re: popper From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * -rw-rw-r-- 1 732 eudora 90059 Dec 17 00:44 qpop2.1.3-r5.tar.Z * -rw-rw-r-- 1 732 eudora 103301 Mar 3 00:55 qpop2.1.4-r1.tar.Z * * Where did qpop2.1.4-r2.tar.Z come from? What now? All I know is that I got a report from Frank Nobis that r2 is out and it worked when I changed the DISTNAME. I actually fetched this thing several times using this Makefile (the last time on May 2), that's why it's in the distfiles directory. :) So it's certainly not from the outer space. Now, the question is, where did qpop2.1.4-r2.tar.Z go to? Satoshi ------- Cf. (Makefile) revision 1.8 date: 1995/04/16 20:39:08; author: asami; state: Exp; lines: +4 -4 Correct DISTNAME to fetch, upgrade at the same time. New version is 2.1.4-r2. Submitted by: Frank Nobis From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 08:18:35 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id IAA06336 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 08:18:35 -0700 Received: from leo.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.249]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA06328 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 08:18:26 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by leo.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id XAA00635; Wed, 17 May 1995 23:17:34 +0800 Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 23:17:33 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: FREEBSD-PORTS-L Subject: tcsh 6.06 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Has anyone successfully compiled this yet? I see FreeBSD listed in the host.defs file (as "Free BSD", argh...), but not in the Ports file. Running the suggest "xmkmf ; make" produces a *lot* of errors and warnings. -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 09:07:36 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA07433 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 09:07:36 -0700 Received: from eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (root@eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.42.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id JAA07425 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 09:07:29 -0700 Received: from vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.142.36]) by eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP id <43057>; Wed, 17 May 1995 18:07:11 +0200 Received: (from jhs@localhost) by vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA24418 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 May 1995 14:33:59 +0200 Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 14:33:59 +0200 From: Julian Howard Stacey Message-Id: <199505171233.OAA24418@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: SUBDIR in Makefiles - usage thereof Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I suggest a minor syntax re-org of ports/Makefile & ports/*/Makefile : Present: SUBDIR = this that the_other foobar Future SUBDIR?= SUBDIR += this SUBDIR += that SUBDIR += the_other SUBDIR += foobar This will enable a higher success ratio when multiple & possibly overlapping/ inconsistent patch scripts, that are are applied from time to time on local ports dirs that aren't monolithcally & repetitively remade on the odd spare gigabyte drive that we all have handy ;-) This minor change buys flexibility, it's also been tried & tested before (& is still to be seen in such files as src/Makefile) I also propose we prepend a SUBDIR?= to allow for extra things `on the fly', this hook would allow (eg) to have `ports in progress' that we want in the tree for some reason, but don't want automatically compiled ... yet. Whether this is done before or after 2.0.5 is (I imagine) Satoshi's choice. Julian S. From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 09:32:40 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA08294 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 09:32:40 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA08282 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 09:32:32 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id SAA12089 ; Wed, 17 May 1995 18:32:08 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id SAA15690 ; Wed, 17 May 1995 18:32:08 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199505171632.SAA15690@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: tcsh 6.06 To: taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw (Brian Tao) Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 18:32:07 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Brian Tao" at May 17, 95 11:17:33 pm X-Operating-System: FreeBSD BUILT-19950501 ctm#617 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 458 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Has anyone successfully compiled this yet? I see FreeBSD listed > in the host.defs file (as "Free BSD", argh...), but not in the Ports > file. Running the suggest "xmkmf ; make" produces a *lot* of errors > and warnings. I've never used the Imakefile for compiling tcsh. Can you try the other method ? -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995 From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 10:04:43 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA09050 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 10:04:43 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA09034 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 10:04:40 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA03565; Wed, 17 May 1995 10:04:23 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 10:04:23 -0700 Message-Id: <199505171704.KAA03565@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de CC: ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199505171233.OAA24418@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> (message from Julian Howard Stacey on Wed, 17 May 1995 14:33:59 +0200) Subject: Re: SUBDIR in Makefiles - usage thereof From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * SUBDIR?= * SUBDIR += this * SUBDIR += that * SUBDIR += the_other * SUBDIR += foobar Actually I thought about this before when I was cleaning up the Makefiles, the reason why I didn't want to go for it at that time was because I thought it will make the subdir Makefiles too long and scroll off my screen. Now that I think of it, if the Makefile is so long it's scrolling off my screen, that category has too much stuff in it and should be split up anyway so that's not a valid argument against it. :) * This will enable a higher success ratio when multiple & possibly overlapping/ * inconsistent patch scripts, that are are applied from time to time on local * ports dirs that aren't monolithcally & repetitively remade on the odd spare * gigabyte drive that we all have handy ;-) Well, I'm not sure why people would want to deal with hand-made patches to the ports Makefiles, they are all so small anyway! In fact, the entire ports tree in less than 10MB (without distfiles), so why don't you all go and grab the whole hting today! (And start testing! :) You didn't mention one thing by the way, it is that the current method can become very irritating when you are adding/subtracting things. The ordering sometimes gets screwed up, you need to break lines when it gets too long, etc. Also, it will make it easier when we formally support the RESTRICTED and BROKEN keywords, as we can do something like BROKEN += a_broken_port SUBDIR += a_good_port RESTRICTED += cryptic_port SUBDIR += great_port SUBDIR += some_port RESTRICTED += what_a_jerk and still have them in alphabetical order. :) * This minor change buys flexibility, it's also been tried & tested before * (& is still to be seen in such files as src/Makefile) BTW, I definitely don't want turn this into a sea of .if exists(foodir) SUBDIR += foodir .endif like seen in /usr/src/Makefile, it's ugly and hard to read. If we want to deal with these sort of things (i.e., missing directories), we can do it in bsd.port.subdir.mk. * I also propose we prepend a SUBDIR?= to allow for extra things `on * the fly', this hook would allow (eg) to have `ports in progress' * that we want in the tree for some reason, but don't want * automatically compiled ... yet. I'm not sure about the feasability of doing "make SUBDIR=new_port" though, it may screw things up royally if there is something down the tree that includes a different bsd.*.mk file. I remember running into this problem when I was trying to compile linpack or something. * Whether this is done before or after 2.0.5 is (I imagine) Satoshi's choice. I don't have anything against it, there is no change of functionality here, and it will certainly look much cleaner. If nobody objects in the next 24 hours or so, I'll go ahead and update all the Makefiles. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 10:13:48 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA09231 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 10:13:48 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA09225 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 10:13:46 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA03619; Wed, 17 May 1995 10:12:44 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 10:12:44 -0700 Message-Id: <199505171712.KAA03619@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr CC: taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199505171632.SAA15690@blaise.ibp.fr> (roberto@blaise.ibp.fr) Subject: Re: tcsh 6.06 From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * > Has anyone successfully compiled this yet? I see FreeBSD listed * > in the host.defs file (as "Free BSD", argh...), but not in the Ports * > file. Running the suggest "xmkmf ; make" produces a *lot* of errors * > and warnings. * * I've never used the Imakefile for compiling tcsh. Can you try the other * method ? ...or can you try to use the ports stuff? Just change the DISTNAME in the Makefile, and see what happens. Many ports will just work that way. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 10:18:54 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA09321 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 10:18:54 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA09315 ; Wed, 17 May 1995 10:18:53 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA03644; Wed, 17 May 1995 10:18:18 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 10:18:18 -0700 Message-Id: <199505171718.KAA03644@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: imb@scgt.oz.au CC: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199505171706.DAA14315@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> (message from michael butler on Thu, 18 May 1995 03:06:44 +1000 (EST)) Subject: Re: TODO list for 2.0.5 From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Cc: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, core@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org (Taken out "core", changed "hackers" to "ports") * Last time I tried to get perl 5.001 to compile it failed, miserably, with * complaints about -ldl and -lcposix not being found .. and maybe others but I * don't remember, sorry, Um, there aren't such libraries in FreeBSD so that sounds like a "configure" screwup. It's compiling happily here, can you try to do it again and send in a bug report? "send-pr" is your friend (and ours too). Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 12:50:37 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA12415 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 12:50:37 -0700 Received: from cabri.obs-besancon.fr (cabri.obs-besancon.fr [193.52.184.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA12409 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 12:50:33 -0700 Received: by cabri.obs-besancon.fr (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA05129; Wed, 17 May 95 21:50:44 +0100 Date: Wed, 17 May 95 21:50:44 +0100 From: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr (Jean-Marc Zucconi) Message-Id: <9505172050.AA05129@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> To: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU Cc: jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de, ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199505171704.KAA03565@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> (asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU) Subject: Re: SUBDIR in Makefiles - usage thereof X-Mailer: Emacs Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Satoshi" == Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?= writes: > I don't have anything against it, there is no change of functionality > here, and it will certainly look much cleaner. If nobody objects in > the next 24 hours or so, I'll go ahead and update all the Makefiles. I will not object to this change, but I think that this can be done *after* the release (can you say CODE FREEZE?) > Satoshi Jean-Marc. _____________________________________________________________________________ Jean-Marc Zucconi Observatoire de Besancon F 25010 Besancon cedex PGP Key: finger jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr ============================================================================= From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 13:06:16 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA12752 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 13:06:16 -0700 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA12746 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 13:06:11 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA12278; Wed, 17 May 1995 13:05:05 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199505172005.NAA12278@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: SUBDIR in Makefiles - usage thereof To: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 13:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Cc: jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de, ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199505171704.KAA03565@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=" at May 17, 95 10:04:23 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1495 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > * SUBDIR?= > * SUBDIR += this > * SUBDIR += that > * SUBDIR += the_other > * SUBDIR += foobar > > Actually I thought about this before when I was cleaning up the > Makefiles, the reason why I didn't want to go for it at that time was > because I thought it will make the subdir Makefiles too long and > scroll off my screen. This is a good idea! ... > Also, it will make it easier when we formally support the RESTRICTED > and BROKEN keywords, as we can do something like > > BROKEN += a_broken_port > SUBDIR += a_good_port > RESTRICTED += cryptic_port > SUBDIR += great_port > SUBDIR += some_port > RESTRICTED += what_a_jerk Another Good Idea(TM), infact his one is a Better Idea!! > and still have them in alphabetical order. :) > > * This minor change buys flexibility, it's also been tried & tested before > * (& is still to be seen in such files as src/Makefile) > > BTW, I definitely don't want turn this into a sea of > > .if exists(foodir) > SUBDIR += foodir > .endif Please don't I am about to rewrite that into something like this: SUBDIR= .for i in ${DIRLIST} .if exits(${i}) SUBDIR+= ${i} .endif .endfor > the next 24 hours or so, I'll go ahead and update all the Makefiles. I object, you are in code freeze, don't go do a wide sweeping change like this, wait for after 2.0.5. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 13:50:47 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA14140 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 13:50:47 -0700 Received: (from hsu@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA14132 for ports; Wed, 17 May 1995 13:50:45 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 13:50:45 -0700 From: Jeffrey Hsu Message-Id: <199505172050.NAA14132@freefall.cdrom.com> To: ports Subject: Re: tcsh 6.06 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> Has anyone successfully compiled this yet? I see FreeBSD listed >> in the host.defs file (as "Free BSD", argh...), but not in the Ports >> file. Running the suggest "xmkmf ; make" produces a *lot* of errors >> and warnings. > I've never used the Imakefile for compiling tcsh. Can you try the other > method ? I believe using imake and not the supplied default Makefile.std is the correct way to build this port. Not that I have any intention of making a port out of this. However, to help someone else make a port out of this, here are my diffs to make tcsh 6.06 compile under FreeBSD. *** ./Imakefile.0 Sat May 13 13:49:14 1995 --- ./Imakefile Tue May 16 01:10:16 1995 *************** *** 170,178 **** # endif # endif /* i386Isc */ # ifdef NetBSDArchitecture # define ConfigH bsd4.4 ! # endif /* NetBsdArchitecture */ # ifdef i386SVR4Architecture # define ConfigH sysv4 --- 170,182 ---- # endif # endif /* i386Isc */ + # ifdef FreeBSDArchitecture + # define ConfigH bsd4.4 + # endif /* FreeBSDArchitecture */ + # ifdef NetBSDArchitecture # define ConfigH bsd4.4 ! # endif /* NetBSDArchitecture */ # ifdef i386SVR4Architecture # define ConfigH sysv4 *** ./sh.exp.c.0 Sat May 13 13:49:16 1995 --- ./sh.exp.c Tue May 16 01:11:51 1995 *************** *** 155,161 **** * and they define _SC_NGROUPS_MAX without having sysconf */ # undef _SC_NGROUPS_MAX ! # ifdef __NetBSD__ # define GID_T gid_t # else # define GID_T int --- 155,161 ---- * and they define _SC_NGROUPS_MAX without having sysconf */ # undef _SC_NGROUPS_MAX ! # if defined(__NetBSD__) || __FreeBSD__ == 2 # define GID_T gid_t # else # define GID_T int *** ./sh.func.c.0 Sat May 13 13:49:17 1995 --- ./sh.func.c Tue May 16 01:12:47 1995 *************** *** 1620,1626 **** # define toset(a) ((a) + 1) # endif /* aiws */ # else /* BSDLIMIT */ ! # if defined(BSD4_4) && !defined(__386BSD__) && !defined(bsdi) typedef quad_t RLIM_TYPE; # else typedef unsigned long RLIM_TYPE; --- 1620,1626 ---- # define toset(a) ((a) + 1) # endif /* aiws */ # else /* BSDLIMIT */ ! # if __FreeBSD__ == 2 || defined(BSD4_4) && !defined(__386BSD__) && !defined(bsdi) typedef quad_t RLIM_TYPE; # else typedef unsigned long RLIM_TYPE; *** ./host.defs.0 Sat May 13 13:49:15 1995 --- ./host.defs Tue May 16 01:20:54 1995 *************** *** 399,405 **** newdef : defined(__FreeBSD__) ! comment : Free BSD vendor : defined(i386) : "intel" hosttype: : "FreeBSD" ostype : : "FreeBSD" --- 399,405 ---- newdef : defined(__FreeBSD__) ! comment : FreeBSD vendor : defined(i386) : "intel" hosttype: : "FreeBSD" ostype : : "FreeBSD" *** ./config_f.h.0 Sat May 13 13:49:12 1995 --- ./config_f.h Tue May 16 01:28:12 1995 *************** *** 75,81 **** /* * VIDEFAULT Make the VI mode editor the default */ ! #undef VIDEFAULT /* * KAI use "bye" command and rename "log" to "watchlog" --- 75,81 ---- /* * VIDEFAULT Make the VI mode editor the default */ ! #define VIDEFAULT /* * KAI use "bye" command and rename "log" to "watchlog" *************** *** 92,98 **** /* * DOTLAST put "." last in the default path, for security reasons */ ! #define DOTLAST /* * NODOT Don't put "." in the default path, for security reasons --- 92,98 ---- /* * DOTLAST put "." last in the default path, for security reasons */ ! #undef DOTLAST /* * NODOT Don't put "." in the default path, for security reasons *************** *** 104,110 **** * on the name of the tty, and environment. * Does not make sense in the modern window systems! */ ! #define AUTOLOGOUT /* * SUSPENDED Newer shells say 'Suspended' instead of 'Stopped'. --- 104,110 ---- * on the name of the tty, and environment. * Does not make sense in the modern window systems! */ ! #undef AUTOLOGOUT /* * SUSPENDED Newer shells say 'Suspended' instead of 'Stopped'. *************** *** 141,147 **** * successful, set $REMOTEHOST to the name or address of the * host */ ! #define REMOTEHOST /* * RCSID This defines if we want rcs strings in the binary or not --- 141,147 ---- * successful, set $REMOTEHOST to the name or address of the * host */ ! #undef REMOTEHOST /* * RCSID This defines if we want rcs strings in the binary or not From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 17 21:52:43 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA24943 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 21:52:43 -0700 Received: from leo ([140.109.40.249]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA24937 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 21:52:16 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by leo (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA00414; Thu, 18 May 1995 12:51:40 +0800 Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 12:51:40 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: Ollivier Robert cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tcsh 6.06 In-Reply-To: <199505171632.SAA15690@blaise.ibp.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 17 May 1995, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > I've never used the Imakefile for compiling tcsh. Can you try the other > method ? Yeah, that was going to be my next attempt (as well as Satoshi's suggestion to use the tcsh 6.05 port as a template). I did get it to compile with a bit of code chopping, but job control is messed up in the resulting binary. -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 18 01:07:30 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA28076 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 01:07:30 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA28067 for ; Thu, 18 May 1995 01:07:23 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id BAA06175; Thu, 18 May 1995 01:07:10 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 01:07:10 -0700 Message-Id: <199505180807.BAA06175@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com CC: jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de, ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199505172005.NAA12278@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> (rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com) Subject: Re: SUBDIR in Makefiles - usage thereof From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * > the next 24 hours or so, I'll go ahead and update all the Makefiles. * * I object, you are in code freeze, don't go do a wide sweeping change * like this, wait for after 2.0.5. Ok ok thanks Jean-Marc and Rod for pulling my leash, I won't do this now.... ;) Satoshi *-<:) (happy with the hat) From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 18 01:53:58 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA00807 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 01:53:58 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA00750 ; Thu, 18 May 1995 01:53:15 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id KAA20411 ; Thu, 18 May 1995 10:53:10 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id KAA18765 ; Thu, 18 May 1995 10:53:09 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199505180853.KAA18765@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: tcsh 6.06 To: hsu@freefall.cdrom.com (Jeffrey Hsu) Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 10:53:09 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: ports@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <199505172050.NAA14132@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Jeffrey Hsu" at May 17, 95 01:50:45 pm X-Operating-System: FreeBSD BUILT-19950501 ctm#617 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1916 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > *** ./sh.exp.c.0 Sat May 13 13:49:16 1995 > --- ./sh.exp.c Tue May 16 01:11:51 1995 > *************** > *** 155,161 **** > * and they define _SC_NGROUPS_MAX without having sysconf > */ > # undef _SC_NGROUPS_MAX > ! # ifdef __NetBSD__ > # define GID_T gid_t > # else > # define GID_T int > --- 155,161 ---- > * and they define _SC_NGROUPS_MAX without having sysconf > */ > # undef _SC_NGROUPS_MAX > ! # if defined(__NetBSD__) || __FreeBSD__ == 2 > # define GID_T gid_t The GUIDELINES way is beter : #if (defined(BSD) && (BSD >= 199306)) as it will catch both NetBSD and FreeBSD with the same stone. > *** ./config_f.h.0 Sat May 13 13:49:12 1995 > --- ./config_f.h Tue May 16 01:28:12 1995 > *************** > *** 75,81 **** > /* > * VIDEFAULT Make the VI mode editor the default > */ > ! #undef VIDEFAULT > > /* > * KAI use "bye" command and rename "log" to "watchlog" > --- 75,81 ---- > /* > * VIDEFAULT Make the VI mode editor the default > */ > ! #define VIDEFAULT I can't agree :-) > /* > * DOTLAST put "." last in the default path, for security reasons > */ > ! #undef DOTLAST I don't agree either as it is useful for Joe User. Note that it is not done for root even with this defined. > --- 104,110 ---- > * on the name of the tty, and environment. > * Does not make sense in the modern window systems! > */ > ! #undef AUTOLOGOUT On most systems (SunOS and FreeBSD at least) it detects that it is running under some window system (probably by looking at DISPLAY) and does not log out the user. > * successful, set $REMOTEHOST to the name or address of the > * host > */ > ! #undef REMOTEHOST Why ?? It is useful... -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995 From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 18 02:00:32 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA01531 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 02:00:32 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA01491 for ; Thu, 18 May 1995 02:00:22 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id KAA19918 ; Thu, 18 May 1995 10:26:05 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id KAA18633 ; Thu, 18 May 1995 10:26:04 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199505180826.KAA18633@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: tcsh 6.06 To: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 10:26:03 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199505171632.SAA15690@blaise.ibp.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at May 17, 95 06:32:07 pm X-Operating-System: FreeBSD BUILT-19950501 ctm#617 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 369 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I've never used the Imakefile for compiling tcsh. Can you try the other > method ? I've compiled it the usual way (Makefile) and with the usual getgroups patch (using gid_t instead of the bogus int) it runs fine here. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995 From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 18 02:14:13 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA02168 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 02:14:13 -0700 Received: (from hsu@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA02158 ; Thu, 18 May 1995 02:14:11 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 02:14:11 -0700 From: Jeffrey Hsu Message-Id: <199505180914.CAA02158@freefall.cdrom.com> To: hsu@freefall.cdrom.com, roberto@blaise.ibp.fr Subject: Re: tcsh 6.06 Cc: ports@freefall.cdrom.com Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I just knew someone was going to comment on configuration. Fortunately I'm getting out of the ports business, so I'm just providing my diffs for whomever is going to maintain the tcsh port to look at. > The GUIDELINES way is beter : Okay. I'll take your word for it. I pulled that one out of the old tcsh patches from the port. >> ! #define VIDEFAULT >I can't agree :-) Like I said, these are my diffs. >> /* >> * DOTLAST put "." last in the default path, for security > reasons >> */ >> ! #undef DOTLAST >I don't agree either as it is useful for Joe User. See above. When I put dot first in my path, I mean put dot first in my path. >> * on the name of the tty, and environment. >> * Does not make sense in the modern window systems! >> */ >> ! #undef AUTOLOGOUT >On most systems (SunOS and FreeBSD at least) it detects that it is running >under some window system (probably by looking at DISPLAY) and does not >log out the user. I never want the system to automatically log me out. But I may agree with you here, since it's easy to just unset the autologout variable. Still, this is my tcsh executable and I don't want to be bothered with unsetting autologout. >> * successful, set $REMOTEHOST to the name or address of the >> * host >> */ >> ! #undef REMOTEHOST >Why ?? It is useful... Ache once said it took a long time and since most of my shells are local ---actually, all the shells that run off this binary---I'm optimizing away the startup time. From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 18 02:52:49 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA03573 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 02:52:49 -0700 Received: from leo ([140.109.40.249]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA03563 for ; Thu, 18 May 1995 02:52:38 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by leo (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA00957; Thu, 18 May 1995 17:45:52 +0800 Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 17:45:51 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: Ollivier Robert cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tcsh 6.06 In-Reply-To: <199505180826.KAA18633@blaise.ibp.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 18 May 1995, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > I've compiled it the usual way (Makefile) and with the usual getgroups > patch (using gid_t instead of the bogus int) it runs fine here. Okay, I'll do it that way then. It would be nice to have this on the 2.0.5 CD-ROM, if there is enough time left. -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 18 03:13:17 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA04495 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 03:13:17 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA04488 for ; Thu, 18 May 1995 03:13:07 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id DAA06784; Thu, 18 May 1995 03:12:39 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 03:12:39 -0700 Message-Id: <199505181012.DAA06784@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw CC: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (message from Brian Tao on Thu, 18 May 1995 17:45:51 +0800 (CST)) Subject: Re: tcsh 6.06 From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Okay, I'll do it that way then. It would be nice to have this on * the 2.0.5 CD-ROM, if there is enough time left. Only if we can get together a team of sufficient number of people (say, 20) and let them test it real quick. Note that we have been in "no upgrades" code freeze mode for four days already. Putting stuff in the tree is not the problem here, but testing is. This is a very important component of the system, I'd rather ship the CDROM with and old and trusty version than a new and untested version. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 18 03:21:43 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA04743 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 03:21:43 -0700 Received: from leo ([140.109.40.249]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA04736 for ; Thu, 18 May 1995 03:21:37 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by leo (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA01003; Thu, 18 May 1995 18:21:22 +0800 Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 18:21:22 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: FREEBSD-PORTS-L Subject: Re: tcsh 6.06 In-Reply-To: <199505181012.DAA06784@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 18 May 1995, Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?= wrote: > > Only if we can get together a team of sufficient number of people > (say, 20) and let them test it real quick. Note that we have been in > "no upgrades" code freeze mode for four days already. Yeah, that's what I was worried about. I thought the code freeze was only applicable to the core FreeBSD distribution, not third-party packages and ports (like tcsh). Well, tcsh 6.0.5 is quite trustworthy as it is, and if someone really wants the latest version, there will be a port/package for 6.0.6 by the time the 2.0.5 CD-ROM rolls out. -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 18 04:35:43 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA05275 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 03:49:27 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA05267 for ; Thu, 18 May 1995 03:49:21 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id DAA06905; Thu, 18 May 1995 03:49:11 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 03:49:11 -0700 Message-Id: <199505181049.DAA06905@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw CC: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Brian Tao on Thu, 18 May 1995 18:21:22 +0800 (CST)) Subject: Re: tcsh 6.06 From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk * Yeah, that's what I was worried about. I thought the code freeze * was only applicable to the core FreeBSD distribution, not third-party * packages and ports (like tcsh). Um, I think I've been shouting about this pretty loudly for quite a while, are you sure your mail connection is okay? Actually my mails to you (that I tried to send you last night) didn't leave my machine for 20 hours, maybe you are having a network problem. Anyway, to reiterate, we are in code freeze for the ports tree too, only bug fixes and additions of new ports are allowed. Be careful about bug fixes though, some alleged "fixes" in the past few days were actually introduction of new bugs. ;) Upgrades are NOT allowed unless there is a really good reason to do so (the old version opens a glaring security hole, etc.) In particular, "the distfile isn't at the master site anymore" isn't a valid reason, 'cause we will have the old distfile on the CD-ROM. Making a port that doesn't package work is a bug fix of the best kind, by the way. :) Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 18 08:57:30 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id IAA11229 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 08:57:30 -0700 Received: from eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (root@eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.42.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id IAA11223 for ; Thu, 18 May 1995 08:57:27 -0700 Received: from vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.142.36]) by eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP id <43062>; Thu, 18 May 1995 17:57:12 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA15682; Thu, 18 May 1995 13:55:07 +0200 Message-Id: <199505181155.NAA15682@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> X-Authentication-Warning: vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SUBDIR in Makefiles - usage thereof In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 May 1995 19:04:23 +0200." <199505171704.KAA03565@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 13:55:07 +0200 From: Julian Howard Stacey Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Well, I'm not sure why people would want to deal with hand-made > patches to the ports Makefiles, I have some patches I apply locally that I've not got round to suggesting to ports@ yet, for instance: -----{ ] Establish a compilation order for majority interests ] I suspect most people need things like mailers, postscript tools, fax etc ] a lot more than they need games, japanese, or russian ] (not that those things aren't nice to have too, just that when ] compiling a system, where the make may break, or disc may run out, ] or you've got a screwed system you need to restore with a new make, ] the system components esssential to most of us are not in games japanese russian ] So it's worth compiling the things most people need first, rather than ] just going the alphabetic route. ] ] Move games to last, (dedicated players can move it first if they want) ] Move japanese russian to last (as most people are not either) ] ] *** old/ports/Makefile Thu May 4 23:57:15 1995 ] --- new/ports/Makefile Fri May 5 19:18:46 1995 ] *************** ] *** 1,8 **** ] # $Id: Makefile,v 1.18 1995/05/01 11:55:37 ache Exp $ ] # ] ! SUBDIR= archivers audio cad comms databases devel editors games graphics \ ] ! japanese lang mail math net news print russian shells utils x11 ] ! ] .include ] ] index: ] --- 1,8 ---- ] # $Id: Makefile,v 1.18 1995/05/01 11:55:37 ache Exp $ ] # ] ! SUBDIR= archivers audio cad comms databases devel editors graphics \ ] ! lang mail math net news print russian shells utils x11 \ ] ! games japanese russian ] .include ] ] index: ] ----- --------} > In fact, > the entire ports tree in less than 10MB (without distfiles), so why > don't you all go and grab the whole hting today! (And start testing! :) I have & do regularly, but when the same things keep breaking regularly, apart from reporting it, I pefer to have my local patch script just patch them out (lots of ports I don't even know what they are, so have zero inclination to fix 'em, plus any inclination is tempered by a 40 second delay per key stroke, going to freefall from Munich thru' about 15 hosts. > Also, it will make it easier when we formally support the RESTRICTED > and BROKEN keywords, as we can do something like BROKEN Sounds attractive :-) I'll wait to read /usr/share/mk/*po*.mk to discover RESTRICTED functionality. Keep up the good work :-) Thanks, Julian S From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 18 11:27:29 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA15065 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 11:27:29 -0700 Received: from eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (root@eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.42.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA15059 for ; Thu, 18 May 1995 11:27:27 -0700 Received: from vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.142.36]) by eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP id <43080>; Thu, 18 May 1995 20:27:08 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA24264; Thu, 18 May 1995 18:40:09 +0200 Message-Id: <199505181640.SAA24264@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> X-Authentication-Warning: vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Serge A. Babkin" cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pcnfsd or bwnfsd In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 May 1995 11:00:42 +0200." <199505180900.OAA01826@hq.icb.chel.su> Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 18:40:08 +0200 From: Julian Howard Stacey Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Bwnfsd is public domain, pcnfsd looks like freeware but I'm > not a lawyer to be shure :-) > A question is: Perhaps we need to include them in the > distribution ? Sure would be handy (always assuming we dont have this functionality already somehow) why not make a port of it ? (just look at another port for an example of how to) PS I switched this thread from hackers to ports Julian S From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 18 21:31:53 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA11944 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 21:31:53 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA11938 ; Thu, 18 May 1995 21:31:49 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA09584; Thu, 18 May 1995 21:31:47 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 21:31:47 -0700 Message-Id: <199505190431.VAA09584@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: torstenb@FreeBSD.org CC: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [bugs@ns1.win.net: re: Help! (in, freezups)] From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Torsten, can you take a look at this? Satoshi ------- From: Mark Hittinger Subject: re: Help! (in, freezups) To: current@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 12:31:25 -0400 (EDT) > From: "Alok K. Dhir" > I've got a news server (INN1.4sec - latest port on freebsd.cdrom.com) > running -current (as of yesterday). For the last 2.5 weeks or so, I've > been SUPing just about every other day... Why? Because I am waiting for > a kernel that doesn't crash every day. Before this, I was running > -current as of mid April (roughly), and did not have this crashing > problem. I can't seem to pinpoint exactly what went wrong. I'm not seeing terrible problems but I'm not using MMAP yet :-) Make sure you have this patch installed in your INN: I forget where it came from - may have been direct from rsalz) and patched it on to INN 1.4 here. The relevant area, as kluged, now reads (around line 82 in site.c): if (AmRoot) xchown(name); if (cp) { if (cp->fd >= 0) syslog(L_ERROR, "DEBUG ERROR SITEspool trashed:%d %s:%d", cp->fd, sp->Name, i); WCHANremove(cp); RCHANremove(cp); SCHANremove(cp); close(cp->fd); cp->fd = i; return TRUE; } sp->Channel = CHANcreate(i, CTfile, CSwriting, SITEreader, SITEwritedone); if (sp->Channel == NULL) { ----------------------- That fixes a file descriptor leak in INN. I think you should probably re-compile with MMAP off if it is on, and put this patch in. Then re-install the re-linked images. Just out of paranoia I'd run fsck on your news partition, rebuild your history files, and do an expireover -s if you are using the NOV database. Depending on your load you might also want to consider these options in your kernel config file: MAXUSERS 256 options "CHILD_MAX=128" options "OPEN_MAX=128" options "NMBCLUSTERS=512" But you should pick your own numbers for these. My average uptime is out to 4 days now on my heaviest hit box, the other boxes that have lighter load have very good uptimes. I have also noticed very nice performance improvements over the earlier kernels. The failures that I am seeing are scsi buffer already done freezups. About once a week on my 4 gig news harddrive. Regards, Mark Hittinger bugs@win.net From owner-freebsd-ports Fri May 19 07:57:30 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA24468 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 19 May 1995 07:57:30 -0700 Received: from ki1.chemie.fu-berlin.de (ki1.Chemie.FU-Berlin.DE [160.45.24.21]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id HAA24462 for ; Fri, 19 May 1995 07:57:27 -0700 Received: by ki1.chemie.fu-berlin.de (Smail3.1.28.1) from sirius.physik.fu-berlin.de (130.133.3.140) with smtp id ; Fri, 19 May 95 15:32 MEST Received: by sirius.physik.fu-berlin.de; id AA20284; Fri, 19 May 1995 15:32:43 +0200 From: Thomas Graichen Message-Id: <9505191332.AA20284@sirius.physik.fu-berlin.de> Subject: general porting questions To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 15:32:42 +0200 (MET DST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1567 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk hello i tried to port the ddd (data display debugger) frontend for gdb to FreeBSD - it compiled fine but if run it i get graichen@mordillo:~/tmp/ddd-1.0a/ddd> ddd (gdb) cannot set terminal foreground process group: Inappropriate ioctl for device then it opens a window with gdb in (xxgdb like) and there's something like [?1h=(gdb) instead of gdb do you have any ideas there this is coming from - i think has to do something with the terminal handling ? ... and another question too: i also compiled term fro FreeBSD - it works fine on the client side but at the server side i get the following if i try to run "trsh" (something like an rsh over a term connection - it opens a shell at the over end - server side) Warning: no access to tty (Inappropriate ioctl for device). Thus no job control in this shell. and this opend shell behaves a bit courois (hangs sometimes after certain keystrokes - any ideas - i think this might be a general problem in programs ported to FreeBSD and may be you know it - thanks in advance - t _______________________________________________________||_____________________ __|| Perfection is reached, not when there is no __|| thomas graichen longer anything to add, but when there __|| freie universitaet berlin is no longer anything to take away __|| fachbereich physik __|| - Antoine de Saint-Exupery - __|| ___________________________||____email: graichen@omega.physik.fu-berlin.de____