From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Oct 22 01:43:25 1995
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id BAA29250
          for stable-outgoing; Sun, 22 Oct 1995 01:43:25 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA29195
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 22 Oct 1995 01:42:03 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA06049; Sun, 22 Oct 1995 01:40:23 -0700
To: davidg@Root.COM
cc: Heikki Suonsivu <hsu@cs.hut.fi>, stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.1.0-951020-SNAP - 2.1 *Release Candidate* 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 21 Oct 1995 23:01:53 PDT."
             <199510220601.XAA04220@corbin.Root.COM> 
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 01:40:23 -0700
Message-ID: <6047.814351223@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>    I don't know if I consider this a "critical" bug, however, as it might be
> difficult to manifest during normal operations. I think that "slirp" must be
> doing something strange - like an fchown() on a TTY. I'll have to look into
> this in more detail.

If "slirp" is manifesting it regularly, then I'd say that qualified
for "normal operations", wouldn't it?  I do know that the package is
very popular, as Heikki mentions.  Sort of the poor man's TIA, I
think.

						Jordan