From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Dec 11 15:07:08 1995 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA10662 for stable-outgoing; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 15:07:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA10634 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 15:07:00 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id QAA07505; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 16:09:30 -0700 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 16:09:30 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199512112309.QAA07505@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Bringing stuff into 2.1? Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Since the next release is going to be 2.1.1, what's the policy for bringing in changes to the 2.1 branch from -current? I know of a couple changes that could go into the branch, but I'm unsure what are considered 'ok' changes and which are considered 'experimental'. For example, the sliplogin/slattach changes could go in (they've been running here for months now), but I'm not sure if we want them to go in. I'd also like to see the PPP stuff move in, and even the ibcs2 kernel stuff, but I'm not heading in that direction until we have an idea what the policy is going to be. Nate