From owner-freebsd-hardware Sun Mar 17 16:01:36 1996 Return-Path: owner-hardware Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA15953 for hardware-outgoing; Sun, 17 Mar 1996 16:01:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA15927 Sun, 17 Mar 1996 16:01:31 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id SAA25321; Sun, 17 Mar 1996 18:00:15 -0600 From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199603180000.SAA25321@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: comtrol rocketports To: michael@memra.com (Michael Dillon) Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 18:00:15 -0600 (CST) Cc: jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com, erich@basenet.com, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Michael Dillon" at Mar 16, 96 11:39:35 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > And what's wrong with building special-purpose terminal servers out of > Linux boxes and using FreeBSD for all the other servers? After all, Linux > is UNIX too and all a terminal server needs to do is run a bunch of serial > ports and maybe a few rlogins to a FreeBSD shell server. In a word: "reliability". ... JG