From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Jul 21 16:43:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA03532 for isp-outgoing; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 16:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ecpi.com (ecpi.com [205.238.159.50]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA03527 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 16:43:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from tpatel@localhost) by ecpi.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA10773 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 18:53:07 GMT From: Tushar Patel Message-Id: <199607211853.SAA10773@ecpi.com> Subject: ppp: question? To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 18:53:07 +0000 () X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi , I have many customers who uses Machintosh to dial-up. They are using MacPPP for the network connection. Nobody is having any problem to get connected, but one customer when he connects to our server we get following message in our "ppp.log" file. "RecvEchoReq: his magic is bad!!" It has not caused any problem in getting connected or staying connected. But I am worried that something might happen. Do anyone know what this message is about? What can I do in setting on his side or our side to get rid of this message? Thanks, Tushar tpatel@ecpi.com From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Jul 21 17:37:14 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA05553 for isp-outgoing; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 17:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slip-3 (mail@slip-3.slip.net [204.160.88.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA05547 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 17:37:12 -0700 (PDT) From: omeganet@slip.net Received: from none.compuserve.com [199.174.176.185] (nickgohere) by slip-3 with smtp (Exim 0.52 #1) id E0ui8wR-0007Lm-00; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 17:33:46 -0700 X-Sender: omeganet@slip.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-Id: Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 17:33:46 -0700 Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk majordomo@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Jul 21 18:03:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA06478 for isp-outgoing; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 18:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ecpi.com (ecpi.com [205.238.159.50]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA06473 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 18:03:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from tpatel@localhost) by ecpi.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA12617 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 20:13:32 GMT From: Tushar Patel Message-Id: <199607212013.UAA12617@ecpi.com> Subject: ppp: problem To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 20:13:32 +0000 () X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Hi , > > I have many customers who uses Machintosh to dial-up. They are using > MacPPP for the network connection. Nobody is having any problem > to get connected, but one customer when he connects to our server > we get following message in our "ppp.log" file. > > "RecvEchoReq: his magic is bad!!" > > It has not caused any problem in getting connected or staying connected. > But I am worried that something might happen. > > Do anyone know what this message is about? > What can I do in setting on his side or our side to get rid of this message? > > > Thanks, > Tushar > tpatel@ecpi.com > > > > > From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jul 22 00:32:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA24045 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 00:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nanguo.chalmers.com.au (chalmers.com.au [203.1.96.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA24040 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 00:32:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nanguo.chalmers.com.au (Smail3.1.28.1 #8) id m0uiFY7-00032IC; Mon, 22 Jul 96 17:37 EST Message-Id: From: robert@chalmers.com.au (Robert Chalmers) Subject: Virtual domains? To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org (freebsd-isp) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 17:37:02 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Does FreeBSD do virtual domains? like BSDI or SCO.5 and a few others. If so, how so? Virtual domains, Virtual servers I've heard the process called both. thanks, Robert -- The China House Sheng Huo Jiu Shi Dou Zheng robert@chalmers.com.au for Whirled Peas http://chalmers.com.au Location: Web Works Whitsunday. 21'7" S, 149'14" E. From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jul 22 04:03:18 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA01840 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 04:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tbd.gfoster.com (dyna231.intr.net [204.157.123.231]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA01833 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 04:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gfoster@localhost) by tbd.gfoster.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id HAA05277; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 07:02:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 07:02:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Glen Foster Message-Id: <199607221102.HAA05277@tbd.gfoster.com> To: robert@chalmers.com.au CC: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-reply-to: (robert@chalmers.com.au) Subject: Re: Virtual domains? Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Yes. This has traditionally been accomplished by assigning multiple IP addresses to an interface, something that FreeBSD has been able to do for some time (since 1.1.5?). Web servers can be configured to return different page heirarchies depending on the address at which they were addressed. This may not be as important a feature any more as the latest Apache release (1.1.1) no longer needs it to support virtual hosts, see http://www.apache.org/, and other web servers (are there any? :-) will undoubtedly adopt similar functionality. Glen Foster >From: robert@chalmers.com.au (Robert Chalmers) >Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 17:37:02 +1000 (EST) > >Does FreeBSD do virtual domains? like BSDI or SCO.5 and a few others. >If so, how so? >Virtual domains, Virtual servers I've heard the process called both. From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jul 22 04:31:46 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA03412 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 04:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mouse.slip.net (mouse.slip.net [204.160.88.102]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA03407 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 04:31:45 -0700 (PDT) From: omeganet@slip.net Received: from none.compuserve.com [199.174.133.3] by mouse.slip.net with smtp (Exim 0.53 #1) id E0uiJCm-00004O-00; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 04:31:17 -0700 X-Sender: omeganet@slip.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-Id: Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 04:31:17 -0700 Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk majordomo@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jul 22 08:25:21 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA12055 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 08:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tombstone.sunrem.com (tombstone.sunrem.com [206.81.134.54]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA12048 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 08:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from brandon@localhost) by tombstone.sunrem.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA14750; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 09:24:59 -0600 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 09:24:58 -0600 (MDT) From: Brandon Gillespie To: Glen Foster cc: robert@chalmers.com.au, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtual domains? In-Reply-To: <199607221102.HAA05277@tbd.gfoster.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 22 Jul 1996, Glen Foster wrote: > This may not be as important a feature any more as the latest Apache > release (1.1.1) no longer needs it to support virtual hosts, see > http://www.apache.org/, and other web servers (are there any? :-) will > undoubtedly adopt similar functionality. This only works if the client provides data on the host it thought it was going to. I dont recall the HTTP spec at the moment, but I thought this was not a required action. From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jul 22 08:37:24 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA12544 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 08:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scooter.quickweb.com (scooter.quickweb.com [199.212.134.8]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA12536 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 08:37:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (mark@localhost) by scooter.quickweb.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA13130; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 11:38:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 11:38:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Mark Mayo To: Glen Foster cc: robert@chalmers.com.au, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtual domains? In-Reply-To: <199607221102.HAA05277@tbd.gfoster.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 22 Jul 1996, Glen Foster wrote: > Yes. This has traditionally been accomplished by assigning multiple > IP addresses to an interface, something that FreeBSD has been able to > do for some time (since 1.1.5?). Web servers can be configured to > return different page heirarchies depending on the address at which > they were addressed. 'man ifconfig' to find out how.. (ex. ifconfig ep0 alias 199.111.111.111 adds this IP number to the interface) > > This may not be as important a feature any more as the latest Apache > release (1.1.1) no longer needs it to support virtual hosts, see > http://www.apache.org/, and other web servers (are there any? :-) will > undoubtedly adopt similar functionality. > "Software Virtual Servers" are part of the http/1.1 standard (proposed), and were first implememted by the Netscape servers. One thing to remember with these "non-ip based" virtual servers is that to date, only Netscape Navigator sends the required HEADER to let the web server know the NAME of the domain it's after. So if most of your hits are coming from Nav. 2.0 or higher, it's safe to use Software Virtual Servers. If you have a lot of hits from places like AOL or Compuserve, however, it would be a bad idea to implement either Netscape's or Apache's new virtual domain method. Hopefully all browsers will start supporting http/1.1 soon and we can free up the 1/2 million or so IP numbers stupidly tied up doing multi-domain web serving... -Mark ------------------------------------------- | Mark Mayo mark@quickweb.com | | C-Soft www.quickweb.com | ------------------------------------------- "To iterate is human, to recurse divine." - L. Peter Deutsch > Glen Foster > > >From: robert@chalmers.com.au (Robert Chalmers) > >Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 17:37:02 +1000 (EST) > > > >Does FreeBSD do virtual domains? like BSDI or SCO.5 and a few others. > >If so, how so? > >Virtual domains, Virtual servers I've heard the process called both. > From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jul 22 09:03:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA13664 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 09:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tbd.gfoster.com (dyna228.intr.net [204.157.123.228]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA13657 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 09:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gfoster@localhost) by tbd.gfoster.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id MAA05717; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 12:02:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 12:02:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Glen Foster Message-Id: <199607221602.MAA05717@tbd.gfoster.com> To: brandon@tombstone.sunrem.com CC: robert@chalmers.com.au, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-reply-to: (message from Brandon Gillespie on Mon, 22 Jul 1996 09:24:58 -0600 (MDT)) Subject: Re: Virtual domains? Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk OK OK OK, I admit, I'm lazy, you made me go back and read the Apache docs. HTTP/1.0 does not show the name by which the server was referenced. HTTP/1.1 (currently being specified) does. Obviously, multiple-IP-address-enabled virtual hosts are not going away until clients get wise to HTTP/1.1. According to the Apache docs, Netscape 2.0 and later does support HTTP/1.1 but, of course, Netscape is not the only browser out there (you wouldn't know it by the content of most pages :-). Sorry for the misleading info. >Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 09:24:58 -0600 (MDT) >From: Brandon Gillespie >cc: robert@chalmers.com.au, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > >On Mon, 22 Jul 1996, Glen Foster wrote: >> This may not be as important a feature any more as the latest Apache >> release (1.1.1) no longer needs it to support virtual hosts, see >> http://www.apache.org/, and other web servers (are there any? :-) will >> undoubtedly adopt similar functionality. > >This only works if the client provides data on the host it thought it was >going to. I dont recall the HTTP spec at the moment, but I thought this >was not a required action. From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jul 22 09:08:35 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA13974 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 09:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.webspan.net (root@orion.webspan.net [206.154.70.41]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA13968 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 09:08:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (gpalmer@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.webspan.net (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA06860 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 12:08:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: orion.webspan.net: Host gpalmer@localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: PM2e's Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 12:08:29 -0400 Message-ID: <6857.838051709@orion.webspan.net> Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi I know someone who has a number (8 or 9) Portmaster 2e-30 machines which have a reliability problem. They are running 3.3.1 of the software and talking to a RADIUS server for authentication. It seems that after a week or so of uptime (servicing requests from 30 28k8 capable modems doing rlogin's, SLIP and PPP) that something happens (maybe memory becomes fragmented?) and that sometimes when someone goes to start PPP, they get thrown off during PPP negotiation. Has anyone else seen this? The PM2e's have 1Mb of RAM in them (the default) ... would it help to go to 4Mb or maybe 16Mb? Any other solutions? Thanks Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jul 22 12:27:31 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA28985 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 12:27:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.multinet.net (helix.multinet.net [204.138.173.21]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA28972 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 12:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from help.multinet.net (help.multinet.net [204.191.112.5]) by mail.multinet.net (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id TAA24033 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 19:22:26 GMT Message-Id: <199607221922.TAA24033@mail.multinet.net> X-Sender: admin@multinet.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 13:36:30 -0400 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: admin@mail.multinet.net (graydon hoare) Subject: Broken statically linked ls problem Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi. I have installed beta-11 of wu_ftpd 2.4 academ, and am attempting to convince it to give directory listings to my anonymous logins. I have read that this problem is due primarily to the chroot that ftpd does, so I did: make -D NOSHARED and ls came out some hundred and sixty K. ldd ls says it is not a dynamic binary, and it runs fine as /ftp/bin/ls from any login shell, but when it's accessed through the ftpd I still get no directory listings. Any suggestions as to what ELSE I might be doing wrong? It's not a permissions problem cause if you know the pathnames you can read and write properly based on the permissions I set up. ftpdaccess doesn't seem to have any fields that specify who gets to read directories or not, I can't figure what else it could be. Maybe I didn't specify enough fancy footwork during the make of ls -- are there any other flags that are relevant here? thanks -graydon From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Jul 23 05:38:18 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA10888 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 05:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pino.ngonet.be (pino.ngonet.be [193.190.166.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA10877; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 05:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from koekiemonster.ngonet.be (tommie.ngonet.be [193.190.166.2]) by pino.ngonet.be (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA30247; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 13:34:25 +0200 Message-ID: <31F4C725.377A@ngonet.be> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 14:35:49 +0200 From: Gunter Loos Reply-To: Gunter.Loos@ngonet.be Organization: NgoNet Brussels Belgium X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b4Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org, isp@freebsd.org Subject: Serial card problem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have recently bought a simple serial card (two ports) for my freebsd 2.1 system. Now it appears they have the same irq's as the existing ports, and I can't seem to get them up and running. It is a RTX-05D-2 FIFO card. Does anyone know of this card, seen it before, installed it? My sysconfig now is device sio0 at isa? port "IO_COM1" tty irq 4 vector siointr device sio1 at isa? port "IO_COM2" tty irq 3 vector siointr device sio2 at isa? port "IO_COM3" tty irq ? vector siointr device sio3 at isa? port "IO_COM4" tty irq ? vector siointr -- . .__ . |Nationaal Centrum voor OntwikkelingsSamenwerking vzw, NgoNet _| _ [ __ | |Voice Gunter.Loos@+32 2 5392620 Fax +32 2 5391343 (_](/, [_./(_|| |mailto:gul@ngonet.be "You are all weirdos." - Sam the Eagle ----MijnEigenWoordenNietVanIemandAnders - MyOwnExpressionsNotSomeoneElses---- From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Jul 23 22:21:29 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA16043 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 22:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns2.win.net (ns2.win.net [204.215.209.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA16037 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 22:21:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from launchpad.win.net (launchpad@localhost) by ns2.win.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with UUCP id BAA22763 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 01:20:43 -0400 Received: by win.net!launchpad; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 01:17:07 X-Mailer: WinNET Mail, v4.0a Message-ID: Reply-To: fbsd-isp@launchpad.win.net (Joe Mays - FreeBSD-ISP) To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 01:17:07 -0400 Subject: Perl 5.002 From: fbsd-isp@launchpad.win.net (Joe Mays - FreeBSD-ISP) Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've been trying to install perl 5.002 for some cgi scripting purposes, and the make process keeps wiping out complaining about an invalid parameter in inet.h. We haven't changed inet.h from the standard 2.1-stable release, and it happens on three different freebsd machines here. I tried both the perl 5.002 from the ports collection and a copy downloaded from the perl site. Both wiped out the exact same way. Has anyone else encountered this? Joe Mays From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Jul 23 23:36:04 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA21115 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 23:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pino.ngonet.be (pino.ngonet.be [193.190.166.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA21110 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 23:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gonzo.ngonet.be (tommie.ngonet.be [193.190.166.2]) by pino.ngonet.be (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA03498 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 07:32:28 +0200 Message-ID: <31F5C3FA.874@ngonet.be> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 08:34:34 +0200 From: Gunter Loos Organization: NgoNet X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serial Card problem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Doug White wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jul 1996, Gunter Loos wrote: > > > I have recently bought a simple serial card (two ports) > > for my freebsd 2.1 system. Now it appears they have the > > same irq's as the existing ports, and I can't seem to > > get them up and running. > > Well, that is no good; FreeBSD won't let you share interrupts. Change the > jumper settings on the card so all ports have different IRQs. Then > configure the kernel as appropriate. > *WHAT* ? And Dos can? :-)But it's no good: only 3 and 4 are "jumpable". Stupid card. Boooooo. Gul. From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jul 24 16:49:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA25473 for isp-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 16:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA25453; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 16:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA20437; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 16:44:13 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199607242344.QAA20437@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: X.25 revisited To: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 16:44:13 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199607182313.TAA26901@etinc.com> from "Dennis" at Jul 18, 96 07:13:13 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > We've just finished re-vamping X.25 for FreeBSD, and now that its a > nice clean interface, I want to evaluate possibly modifying the ccitt > stuff to work with our LAPB and X.25 stuff. The questions that I > have are: > > 1) Is this worthwhile? Is it a well-done interface, or does it need to be > reworked completely? > > 2) Is there a terminal server type application available for that interface > so X.25 users dialing into a network could access the FreeBSD system, > or does this need to be built? I believe you are looking for an X.29 PAD. I don't think one is there (the ISODE stuff *might* have one, but I don't remember seeing it). You will probably need to hack your own. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jul 24 18:09:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA29399 for isp-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 18:09:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chunga.apana.org.au (chunga.kt.apana.org.au [202.12.89.57]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA29366; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 18:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from davo@localhost) by chunga.apana.org.au (8.7.5/8.6.12) id KAA21769; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 10:38:11 +0930 (CST) From: Dave Edwards Message-Id: <199607250108.KAA21769@chunga.apana.org.au> Subject: Setup of serial ports To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 10:38:10 +0930 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL19 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi all, Can someone settle an argument for me :) We run FreeBSD 2.1-stable on our dialin box with 38 ports using a 4 port card and 2 cy16 cards. We run all our ports locked at 38400 for a number of reasons. We run mgetty on the ports and its going well with a couple of minor irritations like sliplogin hanging around after line drops sometimes. We've setup the ports like so: ------ snip from /etc/rc.serial comcontrol /dev/ttyd0 dtrwait 100 drainwait 180 comcontrol /dev/ttyd1 dtrwait 100 drainwait 180 comcontrol /dev/ttyd2 dtrwait 100 drainwait 180 comcontrol /dev/ttyd3 dtrwait 100 drainwait 180 comcontrol /dev/ttyd4 dtrwait 100 drainwait 180 comcontrol /dev/ttyd5 dtrwait 100 drainwait 180 for u in 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f do comcontrol /dev/ttyc$u dtrwait 100 drainwait 180 stty -f /dev/ttyic$u hupcl crtscts -clocal 38400 stty -f /dev/ttylc$u hupcl crtscts -clocal 38400 stty -f /dev/cuaic$u hupcl crtscts -clocal 38400 stty -f /dev/cualc$u hupcl crtscts -clocal 38400 done ----------- I've been told that the lock-state device needs to be set clocal and not -clocal. Is this true and if so why? ciao dave -- Dave Edwards davo@chunga.kt.apana.org.au || davo@sa.apana.org.au Adelaide, South Australia ---- From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jul 24 20:43:43 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA11069 for isp-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 20:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.its.rpi.edu (mail1.its.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA11059 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 20:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from goya.its.rpi.edu (goya.its.rpi.edu [128.113.113.13]) by mail1.its.rpi.edu (8.6.9/8.6.4) with ESMTP id XAA07550 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 23:43:38 -0400 Received: (dupuik@localhost) by goya.its.rpi.edu (8.6.9/8.6.4) id XAA17527; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 23:43:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 23:43:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Jason Dupuis X-Sender: dupuik@goya.its.rpi.edu To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: A slight problem... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk We've been trying to install 2.1.5-RELEASE from a primary 1.2GB EIDE drive to a secondary 260MB EIDE drive for awhile now but keep getting the same problem. During the stage when the install looks at the first HD in /FreeBSD for the source, we keep getting, "Bad CRC" and "Bypassing XXXXXX bytes of junk" or errors similar to those. Now, I know the files are good; they were FTP'ed directly from ftp.freebsd.org and transferred to the machine via ethernet from a UNIX server. The machine is running Win95 and was downloaded using CuteFTP from the UNIX server. What is wrong? Is it a bug/problem with FreeBSD, or the install procedure? Kenneth J. Dupuis dupuik@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jul 25 00:38:25 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA24131 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gds.de (ns.gds.de [194.77.222.14]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA24120 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto.gds.de (pluto.gds.de [194.77.222.13]) by gds.de (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA29639 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 09:40:48 GMT Message-Id: <199607250940.JAA29639@gds.de> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Richard Gresek" Organization: Plus.Net To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 09:38:19 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: flex-2.5.2 Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.40) Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk To setup postgres95 on my FreeBSD2.1.5 I am looking for the binaries of flex-2.5.2 (It HAS to be 2.5.2 not 2.5.3). I have tried to compile the GNU-sources but failed, since I miss any sources for FreeBSD 2.1.5. I guess I have to pull all the FreeBSD-sources again to be able to compile the GNU-Flex. If someone has the binaries of flex-2.5.2, I would be very happy if she/he could tell where to download them or would send them to ftp.gds.de/incoming. Many thanks in advance. Richard +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ : Plus.Net Internet PoP fuer : Oppenheimer Landstr. 55 Frankfurt & Westerwald : 60596 Frankfurt : Tel.: +49 69 61991275 http://www.plusnet.de : Fax : +49 69 610238 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jul 25 00:38:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA24151 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gds.de (ns.gds.de [194.77.222.14]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA24124 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:38:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto.gds.de (pluto.gds.de [194.77.222.13]) by gds.de (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA29634 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 09:40:31 GMT Message-Id: <199607250940.JAA29634@gds.de> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Richard Gresek" Organization: Plus.Net To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 09:38:01 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: flex-2.5.2 Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.40) Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk To setup postgres95 on my FreeBSD2.1.5 I am looking for the binaries of flex-2.5.2 (It HAS to be 2.5.2 not 2.5.3). I have tried to compile the GNU-sources but failed, since I miss any sources for FreeBSD 2.1.5. I guess I have to pull all the FreeBSD-sources again to be able to compile the GNU-Flex. If someone has the binaries of flex-2.5.2, I would be very happy if she/he coulf tell where to dowload them or would send them on ftp.gds.de/incoming. Many thanks in advance. Richard +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ : GRESEK DATA SYSTEMS : Hauptstrasse 2 : 56271 Kleinmaischeid : Tel.: +49 2689 959120 http://www.gds.de : Fax : +49 2689 959122 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jul 25 04:56:46 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA20345 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 04:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA20305; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 04:56:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id VAA09420; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 21:47:08 +1000 Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 21:47:08 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199607251147.VAA09420@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: davo@chunga.kt.apana.org.au, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setup of serial ports Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >for u in 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f >do > comcontrol /dev/ttyc$u dtrwait 100 drainwait 180 > stty -f /dev/ttyic$u hupcl crtscts -clocal 38400 > stty -f /dev/ttylc$u hupcl crtscts -clocal 38400 > stty -f /dev/cuaic$u hupcl crtscts -clocal 38400 > stty -f /dev/cualc$u hupcl crtscts -clocal 38400 >done >----------- >I've been told that the lock-state device needs to be set clocal >and not -clocal. >Is this true and if so why? Yes, bits in the lock state devices are flags, not settings, and all flags default to off, so turning them off is usually just confusing. You probably want to leave the initial-state device with its default setting of -clocal and set the lock-state device to clocal to stop users from setting clocal. Bruce From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jul 25 16:40:43 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA10955 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 16:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from itchy.mosquito.com (itchy.mosquito.com [206.205.132.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA10950 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 16:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mosquito@localhost) by itchy.mosquito.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id TAA14820 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 19:41:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Mosquito Net Admin Account Message-Id: <199607252341.TAA14820@itchy.mosquito.com> Subject: ftp problems? To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 19:41:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm running wu-ftp on FreeBSD 2.1.5, and having some problems with ftp. People with Windows95 who ftp large files to our system report that the ftp fails from there end (it just hangs). >From our end, an ftpd process just sits around forever. Has anyone else seen problems like this? Any suggestions? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jul 25 21:59:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA27137 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 21:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA27130 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 21:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id VAA21855; Thu, 25 Jul 1996 21:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199607260459.VAA21855@root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Mosquito Net Admin Account cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp problems? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 25 Jul 1996 19:41:20 EDT." <199607252341.TAA14820@itchy.mosquito.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 21:59:03 -0700 Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >I'm running wu-ftp on FreeBSD 2.1.5, and having >some problems with ftp. People with Windows95 >who ftp large files to our system report that >the ftp fails from there end (it just hangs). > >>From our end, an ftpd process just sits around >forever. Has anyone else seen problems like >this? Any suggestions? Since this isn't a known problem, we're going to need a lot more information before we can help you. It's hard to tell, for instance, if the problem is simply caused by a loss of connectivity somewhere in the Internet or if it's a legitimate bug of some kind. It might be useful to know how, for example, how many FTP users are on at the time of the hangs, and how you have your kernel configured. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jul 26 00:23:34 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA04534 for isp-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:23:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pino.ngonet.be (pino.ngonet.be [193.190.166.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA04524; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from koekiemonster.ngonet.be (tommie.ngonet.be [193.190.166.2]) by pino.ngonet.be (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA19796; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 08:19:45 +0200 Message-ID: <31F871E4.6CC@ngonet.be> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 09:21:08 +0200 From: Gunter Loos Reply-To: Gunter.Loos@ngonet.be Organization: NgoNet Brussels Belgium X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b4Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Annelise Anderson CC: questions@freebsd.org, isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: user PPP server problem References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Annelise Anderson wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jul 1996, Anil John wrote: > > > Agreed. But no satisfactory answers have been given to us FreeBSD/Unix > > novices on how to go about setting this up :). I have a win95 and FreeBSD > > box connected using ethernet. I would like to dial up using the FreeBSD box > > using user mode PPP and be able to browse using the tools I have on the > > Win95 box. I do currently have a dyanamic IP assigned to me when I log > > into my ISP. But I have everything setup right such that it works. I can > > use lynx, ftp, telnet etc from the FreeBSD box. > > > But it seems to me you're talking about dialing an ISP from one machine > (running FreeBSD) and expecting another machine (running Win95) connected > to it via ethernet to be able to use the connection to the ISP to browse, > telnet, ping, etc. the outside world. I don't even know if this is > possible. > > Think it is. Use proxies. And, as stated in other mails, there's no problem then when using reserved IP numbers... Oh well. Another thread on this subject. There should definitely something be done on it. Anyone interested in a project on documentation, gathering pointers, tutorials etc on the different aspects of ppp/FreeBSD? I am, so contact me... Gul. -- . .__ . |Nationaal Centrum voor OntwikkelingsSamenwerking vzw, NgoNet _| _ [ __ | |Voice Gunter.Loos@+32 2 5392620 Fax +32 2 5391343 (_](/, [_./(_|| |mailto:gul@ngonet.be "You are all weirdos." - Sam the Eagle ----MijnEigenWoordenNietVanIemandAnders - MyOwnExpressionsNotSomeoneElses---- From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jul 26 03:16:55 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA20395 for isp-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 03:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rs1.mtmc.edu (rs1.mtmc.edu [198.247.160.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA20389; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 03:16:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost by rs1.mtmc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA14818; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 05:07:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 05:07:38 -0500 (CDT) From: Wes Side Story To: Gunter.Loos@ngonet.be Cc: Annelise Anderson , questions@FreeBSD.ORG, isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: user PPP server problem In-Reply-To: <31F871E4.6CC@ngonet.be> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 26 Jul 1996, Gunter Loos wrote: > Annelise Anderson wrote: > > > > On Thu, 25 Jul 1996, Anil John wrote: > > > > > Agreed. But no satisfactory answers have been given to us FreeBSD/Unix > > > novices on how to go about setting this up :). I have a win95 and FreeBSD > > > box connected using ethernet. I would like to dial up using the FreeBSD box > > > using user mode PPP and be able to browse using the tools I have on the > > > Win95 box. I do currently have a dyanamic IP assigned to me when I log > > > into my ISP. But I have everything setup right such that it works. I can > > > use lynx, ftp, telnet etc from the FreeBSD box. > > > > > > But it seems to me you're talking about dialing an ISP from one machine > > (running FreeBSD) and expecting another machine (running Win95) connected > > to it via ethernet to be able to use the connection to the ISP to browse, > > telnet, ping, etc. the outside world. I don't even know if this is > > possible. > > > > Think it is. Use proxies. And, as stated in other mails, there's no problem then > when using reserved IP numbers... > > Oh well. Another thread on this subject. There should definitely something be > done on it. Anyone interested in a project on documentation, gathering pointers, > tutorials etc on the different aspects of ppp/FreeBSD? I am, so contact me... > > Gul. Well, since I'm the one who started this thread you'll be happy to know that with everyone's help I've managed for the most part to get dial-up ppp running on my FreeBSD machine so that my Win95 machine can access the Internet via dial-up networking(using it right now :)!! The only problem left is that once I disconnect, I am unable to get the a ppp connection again untill I reboot the FreeBSD machine and restart ppp. Then it works ok for one more connection... and so on. Any idea on what the fix for this is? I also would be more than happy to help with putting together documentation for dial=up ppp, of course all I know is how to guess what combination of settings will work :) Thanks for everyone's help. Wes Dorale Mount Marty College Network Administrator From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jul 26 08:57:38 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA03611 for isp-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 08:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omnisolve.com (omnisolve.com [206.43.0.16]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA03606 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 08:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from joel@localhost) by omnisolve.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA00838 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 10:00:53 GMT Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 10:00:53 GMT From: Joel Ward Message-Id: <199607261000.KAA00838@omnisolve.com> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Cyclades/modem problem Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk ok, here's the short of my problem: I have an internal modem on /dev/cuaa3, and it is configured for dialup. Works great. I also have a Cyclades 16Ye board, and if i use it to call out, it works great. Problem is, i cant get it to work for dial-ins. the modem answers the phone, but getty never comes up. now here's the long of it (example files and such:) if i dont put any entries in /etc/ttys for any cyclades ports, i can use "ppp" to get to the modem ("set line /dev/cuac0" "term") and then talk to the modem (i say AT, it says OK). The same thing happens when I say "set line /dev/ttyc0" so now i put an entry in /etc/ttys saying: ttyc0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup on secure and I reboot. when i do a "ps ax | grep getty" one of the processes that comes up is: 171 ?? I 0:00.03 /usr/libexec/getty std.9600 ttyc0 so at this point everything seems fine to me. When i dial-in however, the modems connect, but it just sits there. no login:, no anything. I've tried it on several different ports of the cyclades and the same thing happens. My modems are usr sportsers 33.6s, and i set the NVRAM and switches according to what it suggests in the Handbook under dialup ATZ AT&C1&D2&H1&I0&R2&W 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 the switches are: UP UP UP DOWN UP UP UP DOWN but i also tried it with 3 DOWN and 4 UP. (i had to do this to talk to the modem before i rebooted with getty, becasue otherwise the "at" "OK" stuff won't work) I'm confused and frustrated. The only thing I can think of possibly is the settings in /etc/rc.serial maybe dont set up the cyclades ports right, so that they respond to dialout, but not dialin. The section in hte handbook on configuring the serial ports seemed to be really old (1.1.5.1) so it doesn't bear much relation to my system (SNAP-2.2 from May). Could that be the problem? Did i miss anything? - Joel From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jul 26 12:40:47 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA18735 for isp-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 12:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.w3page.com (root@p20.pm-3.pm.dimensional.com [206.100.130.84]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA18729 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 12:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion (blaine@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.w3page.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA10837 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 13:40:44 -0600 Message-ID: <31F91F3B.28BB6D42@w3page.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 13:40:44 -0600 From: Blaine Minazzi Organization: What, me organized? X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b3 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.13 i486) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Xylogics Micro ANNEX xl for sale Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I know this is not the "proper" group for this, but, it is most likely that someone here will be interested. I have a pair of Xylogics MicroAnnex XL's for sale. Model # AXM-D-8-N-100 ( 8 ports. ) Still under warranty. One has UTP and AUI, the other AUI only. ( use a AUI to UTP transciever) Asking price $950 each. Thank you, Blaine Minazzi (303) 762-1657 From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jul 26 16:11:43 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA12548 for isp-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 16:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from isot.isot.com (root@internet-of-texas.Houston.mci.net [204.70.37.26]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA12543 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 16:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gism.isot.com (gism.isot.com [206.24.68.34]) by isot.isot.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA16586 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 13:49:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 13:49:38 -0500 Message-Id: <199607261849.NAA16586@isot.isot.com> X-Sender: gism@ns.isot.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Global Internet Shopping Mall Subject: devices lp0 and ep0??? Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to kernel config file, ep0 is for the 3C509 ethernet card and I configured for it. But during a boot, the kernel reports, lp0 as TCP/IP ready device besides the ep0. Where did the lp0 came from? And then from the FreeBSD box the netstart -nr reports: 206.24.68.1 ... ... ... ep0 ; BSDi box 206.24.68.15 ... ... ... lp0 ; FreeBSD box The FreeBSD see's the BSDi's ethernet as ep0 but lp0 on its own. I'm a bit confused. Also the netstat -i shows: lp0*, ep0, lo0*, tun0* What is lo0? Do I need tun0? I think I got the network somewhat working, at least, I can ping by IP from the FreeBSD box, but still can't ping by name. Could you help? From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Jul 27 07:59:33 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA12488 for isp-outgoing; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 07:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etinc.com (etinc.com [204.141.244.98]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA12483; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 07:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dialup-usr11.etinc.com (dialup-usr11.etinc.com [204.141.95.132]) by etinc.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA01374; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 10:59:35 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 10:59:35 -0400 Message-Id: <199607271459.KAA01374@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: NEWS-READER From: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) Subject: Re: Gateway X.25-->TCP/IP Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >26/07/96 Victor Fofin wrote: > > How do I from my FreeBSDbox gateway X.25--->TCP/IP ? >What for this need (hard,soft ...) ? If this impossible what for >/sys/netccitt code ? And please, forgive my poor english . > >Thanks, >Victor > We have an RFC 877 and RFC 1356 compliant TCP/IP over X.25 product for FreeBSD. We've just completed a new streamlined version with dynamic SVC sub-interfaces. Our board incorporates a hardware LAPB processor and can run X.25 at full T1/E1 speeds. Info at www.etinc.com Dennis ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Emerging Technologies, Inc. http://www.etinc.com Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25 for BSD/OS, FreeBSD and LINUX From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Jul 27 09:57:57 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA20661 for isp-outgoing; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 09:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palin.cc.monash.edu.au (palin.cc.monash.edu.au [130.194.2.87]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA20654 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 09:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (peter@localhost) by palin.cc.monash.edu.au (8.7.3/8.6.4) id CAA13970 for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 28 Jul 1996 02:57:53 +1000 Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 02:57:53 +1000 From: Peter Hawkins Message-Id: <199607271657.CAA13970@palin.cc.monash.edu.au> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: routing problem Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I am attempting to set up my server now. Currently I have a stopgap V34 link out cuaa0 and I have a cyclades so that dialin is via ttyc4 (etc). My cuaa0 is 203.27.85.9 I am trying to talk to ttyc4 now... it's 203.27.222.10 (which I can ping) and the other end (a Win95 box) is 203.27.222.11 (also pingable). the cuaa0 pppd interface works fine. The other is currently: /usr/sbin/pppd -detach 203.27.222.10:203.27.222.11 with /etc/ppp/options: modem crtscts Currently (until I have it going) I am eliminating speed as a problem and running at 38400. Clearly I need to forward from 85.9 <-> 222.10 and I thought routed would just do this for me. Clearly routed is setting up the gateway to 222.11 as I can ping it however my customer can't ping 85.9. Yes I know it's probably a dumb question, but if you can help me I would appreciate it. Peter From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Jul 27 13:59:47 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA03134 for isp-outgoing; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 13:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sidhe.memra.com (sidhe.memra.com [199.166.227.105]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA03125 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 13:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (michael@localhost) by sidhe.memra.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA01350 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 10:21:45 -0700 Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 10:21:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Dillon To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: routing problem In-Reply-To: <199607271657.CAA13970@palin.cc.monash.edu.au> Message-ID: Organization: Memra Software Inc. - Internet consulting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 28 Jul 1996, Peter Hawkins wrote: > Clearly I need to forward from 85.9 <-> 222.10 and I thought routed > would just do this for me. Clearly routed is setting up the gateway > to 222.11 as I can ping it however my customer can't ping 85.9. > Yes I know it's probably a dumb question, but if you can help me > I would appreciate it. Routed doesn't have anything to do with packet forwarding. Delete it. Then make sure you have packet forwarding enabled in the kernel withthe GATEWAY option and make sure your routes are set up properly with route add, and netstat -nr. If you really must run a routing daemon, use gated. Michael Dillon - ISP & Internet Consulting Memra Software Inc. - Fax: +1-604-546-3049 http://www.memra.com - E-mail: michael@memra.com