From owner-freebsd-afs Mon Dec 15 08:47:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA12360 for afs-outgoing; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 08:47:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from phoenix.its.rpi.edu (dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu [128.113.161.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA12351 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 08:47:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu) Received: from localhost (dec@localhost) by phoenix.its.rpi.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA05173 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 11:47:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 11:47:17 -0500 (EST) From: "David E. Cross" To: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: What to call ourselves? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk we need a 'sys' name for this port... How does 'fbsdx86_22' sound? -- David Cross ACS Consultant From owner-freebsd-afs Mon Dec 15 09:20:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA15069 for afs-outgoing; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 09:20:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from postman.opengroup.org (postman.opengroup.org [130.105.1.152]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA15030 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 09:20:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from loverso@opengroup.org) Received: from opengroup.org (coltsfoot.camb.opengroup.org [130.105.3.72]) by postman.opengroup.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA28370; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 12:19:34 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199712151719.MAA28370@postman.opengroup.org> To: "David E. Cross" Cc: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What to call ourselves? In-reply-to: Message from "David E. Cross" . X-Face: "UZ!}1W2N?eJdN(`1%|/OOPqJ).Idk?UyvWw'W-%`Gto8^IkEm>.g1O$[.;~}8E=Ire0|lO .o>:NlJS1@vO9bVmswRoq3j DdX9YGSeJ5a(mfX[1u>Z63G5_^+'8LVqjqvn X-Url: http://www.osf.org/~loverso/ Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 12:19:33 -0500 From: John Robert LoVerso Sender: owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > we need a 'sys' name for this port... > How does 'fbsdx86_22' sound? Sys names have historically been "arch_system". I.e., See this (dated, but accurate) file: /afs/transarc.com/service/systypes We've already been using "i386_fbsd21" and "i386_fbsd22" (see /afs/ri.osf.org/vice/i386_fbsd21). I suggest you stick with that format. Note that "i386" is (unfortunately) generic for the Intel family and is used as such in many other PC-UNIX ports (i386_linux2 and i386_nbsd1, for instance). John John From owner-freebsd-afs Mon Dec 15 09:24:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA15401 for afs-outgoing; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 09:24:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ganymede.or.intel.com (root@ganymede.or.intel.com [134.134.248.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA15393 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 09:24:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wscott@ichips.intel.com) Received: from ichips-jf.jf.intel.com (ichips-jf.jf.intel.com [134.134.50.200]) by ganymede.or.intel.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA02649; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 09:39:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from pdxlx008.pdx.intel.com (pdxlx008.pdx.intel.com [137.102.206.194]) by ichips-jf.jf.intel.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA16568; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 09:26:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from pdxlx008.pdx.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdxlx008.pdx.intel.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA10868; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 09:24:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wscott@pdxlx008.pdx.intel.com) Message-Id: <199712151724.JAA10868@pdxlx008.pdx.intel.com> To: "David E. Cross" cc: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What to call ourselves? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 Dec 1997 11:47:17 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 09:24:01 -0800 From: Wayne Scott Sender: owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > How does 'fbsdx86_22' sound? How about x86_freebsd -Wayne From owner-freebsd-afs Mon Dec 15 09:45:24 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA17484 for afs-outgoing; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 09:45:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail1.its.rpi.edu (root@mail1.its.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA17477 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 09:45:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gad@mlor.its.rpi.edu) Received: from mlor.its.rpi.edu (mlor.its.rpi.edu [128.113.24.92]) by mail1.its.rpi.edu (8.8.8/8.8.6) with SMTP id MAA50152; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 12:45:05 -0500 Received: by mlor.its.rpi.edu (NX5.67f2/NX3.0M) id AA11405; Mon, 15 Dec 97 13:11:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 97 13:11:18 -0500 From: Garance A Drosehn Message-Id: <9712151811.AA11405@mlor.its.rpi.edu> To: dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu, loverso@opengroup.org Subject: Re: What to call ourselves? Cc: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk John Robert LoVerso writes: > Sys names have historically been "arch_system". I.e., See this (dated, but > accurate) file: /afs/transarc.com/service/systypes > > We've already been using "i386_fbsd21" and "i386_fbsd22" (see > /afs/ri.osf.org/vice/i386_fbsd21). I suggest you stick with that format. > > Note that "i386" is (unfortunately) generic for the Intel family and is used > as such in many other PC-UNIX ports (i386_linux2 and i386_nbsd1, for instance). This seems like the right naming conventions to me, too. --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer (MIME & NeXTmail capable) Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy NY USA From owner-freebsd-afs Mon Dec 15 10:25:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA22068 for afs-outgoing; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 10:25:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from phoenix.its.rpi.edu (dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu [128.113.161.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA21390 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 10:20:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu) Received: from localhost (dec@localhost) by phoenix.its.rpi.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA06340; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:20:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:20:07 -0500 (EST) From: "David E. Cross" To: John Robert LoVerso cc: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What to call ourselves? In-Reply-To: <199712151719.MAA28370@postman.opengroup.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Mon, 15 Dec 1997, John Robert LoVerso wrote: > Sys names have historically been "arch_system". I.e., See this (dated, but > accurate) file: /afs/transarc.com/service/systypes > Hmm... that seems to be changing; the solarisx86 verision of AFS is 'sunx86_54' (which IMO is a much cleaner, more concise way of doing things.) This is more FYI, since I have no intetnion of attempting to buck the trend of 'i386_fbsd22' -- David Cross