Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 10:27:05 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD SCSI list) Subject: Re: Tape Backup Drive Not working. Message-ID: <Mutt.19970126102705.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <10798.199701260129@pitcairn.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>; from Richard Tobin on Jan 26, 1997 01:29:03 %2B0000 References: <10798.199701260129@pitcairn.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Richard Tobin wrote: > > Hmm. I wonder if there's any reason to _not_ set the PF bit by > > default? > > Well, as you say, all SCSI-2 devices should be happy with it. So we only need to know which drives wouldn't grok it. Since people usually tend to not respond to surveys of this kind, it's probably the only `solution' to bring in the change, and see who would complain. The Archive Viper 150 is already in the quirks, i would probably better add an entry for the Wangtek 5150ES in advance (and also one for the older 5099?). Does anybody have experiences with the Wangtek 5525ES? Does it claim to be SCSI-2 or SCSI-1? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970126102705.j>