From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Nov 17 07:47:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA19281 for smp-outgoing; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 07:47:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from ady.warp.starnets.ro (ady.warp.starnets.ro [193.226.124.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA19244; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 07:47:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ady@warp.starnets.ro) Received: from localhost (ady@localhost) by ady.warp.starnets.ro (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id RAA06891; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 17:46:42 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 17:46:41 +0200 (EET) From: Penisoara Adrian To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Experience with 3.0-971022-SNAP ?? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, Did anyone experience any unusual behaviors with 3.0-971022-SNAP ? I'll go for installing this SNAP on a *production server* tomorrow (I'll get the binaries this night) and I'd like to know if there are any kind of problems with it (I specially care for the AIC7XXX and netwoking stuff). TIA, Ady (@warp.starnets.ro) From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Nov 18 15:09:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA03184 for smp-outgoing; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 15:09:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from ns.NL.net (ns.NL.net [193.78.240.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA03159 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 15:09:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from benst@terminus.stuyts.nl) Received: from stuyts by ns.NL.net (5.65b/NLnet1.3) id AA08369; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 23:58:23 +0100 Received: from daneel.stuyts.nl (daneel.stuyts.nl [193.78.231.7]) by terminus.stuyts.nl (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA13633 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 23:56:20 +0100 (MET) Received: (from benst@localhost) by daneel.stuyts.nl (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA02838 for freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 23:56:12 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199711182256.XAA02838@daneel.stuyts.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2) X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 3.3 (Enhance 1.2) Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.118.2) From: Ben Stuyts Date: Tue, 18 Nov 97 23:56:09 +0100 To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Success with getting SMP to work, but a few questions remain Reply-To: ben@stuyts.nl Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Dear list, I just (finally) added a second cpu to my Gigabyte 586DX board, upgraded from 2.2-Stable to 3.0-Current, compiled an SMP kernel with the default options, and It Just Worked. GREAT! I have a few questions. BTW, my cvs source tree is up to date till 16-nov. Although I'm compiling something right now, top shows that the machine is almost idle. (It certainly isn't.) For example: CPU states: 4.7% user, 0.0% nice, 20.3% system, 0.8% interrupt, 74.2% idle Mem: 3892K Active, 28M Inact, 15M Wired, 12M Cache, 7595K Buf, 2540K Free Swap: 128M Total, 5728K Used, 122M Free, 4% Inuse PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 12309 root 10 0 1240K 644K wait 0 0:02 0.31% 0.31% make 13234 root 73 0 1972K 1872K CPU0 0 0:00 3.12% 0.15% cc1 13235 root -6 0 504K 656K piperd 0 0:00 1.56% 0.08% as 13232 root 10 0 220K 476K wait 0 0:00 0.78% 0.04% cc 10434 benst 28 0 832K 572K CPU1 1 0:02 0.04% 0.04% top I tried to compile a kernel (GENERIC to be exact) with make -j4, but it failed: make -j4 --- symbols.exclude --- --- symbols.sort --- --- if_vx.o --- --- cd9660_bmap.o --- --- symbols.exclude --- echo "gcc2_compiled." >symbols.exclude echo "___gnu_compiled_c" >>symbols.exclude --- symbols.sort --- grep -v '^#' ../../i386/i386/symbols.raw | sed 's/^ //' | sort -u > symbols.sort --- if_vx.o --- cc -c -O -pipe -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wuninitialized -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DFAILSAFE -DCOMPAT_43 -DMSDOSFS -DNFS -DFFS -DINET -DKERNEL -include opt_global.h ../../dev/vx/if_vx.c --- cd9660_lookup.o --- --- cd9660_bmap.o --- cc -c -O -pipe -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wuninitialized -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DFAILSAFE -DCOMPAT_43 -DMSDOSFS -DNFS -DFFS -DINET -DKERNEL -include opt_global.h ../../isofs/cd9660/cd9660_bmap.c --- cd9660_node.o --- --- cd9660_bmap.o --- In file included from ../../isofs/cd9660/cd9660_bmap.c:43: ../../sys/vnode.h:429: vnode_if.h: No such file or directory --- cd9660_lookup.o --- cc -c -O -pipe -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wuninitialized -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DFAILSAFE -DCOMPAT_43 -DMSDOSFS -DNFS -DFFS -DINET -DKERNEL -include opt_global.h ../../isofs/cd9660/cd9660_lookup.c --- cd9660_node.o --- cc -c -O -pipe -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wuninitialized -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DFAILSAFE -DCOMPAT_43 -DMSDOSFS -DNFS -DFFS -DINET -DKERNEL -include opt_global.h ../../isofs/cd9660/cd9660_node.c --- cd9660_bmap.o --- In file included from ../../isofs/cd9660/cd9660_bmap.c:43: ../../sys/vnode.h:450: warning: `struct vop_lease_args' declared inside parameter list ../../sys/vnode.h:450: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, ../../sys/vnode.h:450: warning: which is probably not what you want. ../../sys/vnode.h:464: warning: `struct vop_lease_args' declared inside parameter list ../../sys/vnode.h:489: warning: `struct vop_lookup_args' declared inside parameter list ../../sys/vnode.h:494: warning: `struct vop_islocked_args' declared inside parameter list ../../sys/vnode.h:495: warning: `struct vop_lock_args' declared inside parameter list ../../sys/vnode.h:496: warning: `struct vop_unlock_args' declared inside parameter list ../../sys/vnode.h:497: warning: `struct vop_islocked_args' declared inside parameter list ../../sys/vnode.h:498: warning: `struct vop_lock_args' declared inside parameter list ../../sys/vnode.h:499: warning: `struct vop_poll_args' declared inside parameter list ../../sys/vnode.h:500: warning: `struct vop_unlock_args' declared inside parameter list ../../sys/vnode.h:501: warning: `struct vop_pathconf_args' declared inside parameter list ../../sys/vnode.h:502: warning: `struct vop_revoke_args' declared inside parameter list ../../sys/vnode.h:503: warning: `struct vop_lock_args' declared inside parameter list --- cd9660_lookup.o --- ... etc Even a make -j1 has this problem. A make without any -j option works fine. Did I miss something? Any ideas? Thanks, Ben From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Nov 18 19:12:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA20204 for smp-outgoing; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 19:12:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA20196 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 19:12:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@spinner.netplex.com.au) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (localhost.dialix.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.netplex.com.au (8.8.7/8.8.7/Spinner) with ESMTP id LAA19487; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:11:39 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@spinner.netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <199711190311.LAA19487@spinner.netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: ben@stuyts.nl cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Success with getting SMP to work, but a few questions remain In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Nov 1997 23:56:09 +0100." <199711182256.XAA02838@daneel.stuyts.nl> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:11:38 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Ben Stuyts wrote: > Dear list, > > I just (finally) added a second cpu to my Gigabyte 586DX board, upgraded from > 2.2-Stable to 3.0-Current, compiled an SMP kernel with the default options, > and It Just Worked. GREAT! > > I have a few questions. BTW, my cvs source tree is up to date till 16-nov. > > Although I'm compiling something right now, top shows that the machine is > almost idle. (It certainly isn't.) For example: > > CPU states: 4.7% user, 0.0% nice, 20.3% system, 0.8% interrupt, 74.2% idle > Mem: 3892K Active, 28M Inact, 15M Wired, 12M Cache, 7595K Buf, 2540K Free > Swap: 128M Total, 5728K Used, 122M Free, 4% Inuse > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > 12309 root 10 0 1240K 644K wait 0 0:02 0.31% 0.31% make > 13234 root 73 0 1972K 1872K CPU0 0 0:00 3.12% 0.15% cc1 > 13235 root -6 0 504K 656K piperd 0 0:00 1.56% 0.08% as > 13232 root 10 0 220K 476K wait 0 0:00 0.78% 0.04% cc > 10434 benst 28 0 832K 572K CPU1 1 0:02 0.04% 0.04% top There are several reasons why this could be the case. The main problem is that the stats are not well adjusted for the smp case, so the time accounting isn't wonderful. In the snapshot that you show above, it looks like you are only doing a single threaded compile. At best, that can use 50% of cpu. > I tried to compile a kernel (GENERIC to be exact) with make -j4, but it faile d: > > make -j4 > --- symbols.exclude --- > --- symbols.sort --- > --- if_vx.o --- > --- cd9660_bmap.o --- > --- symbols.exclude --- > echo "gcc2_compiled." >symbols.exclude > echo "___gnu_compiled_c" >>symbols.exclude > --- symbols.sort --- > grep -v '^#' ../../i386/i386/symbols.raw | sed 's/^ //' | sort -u > symbo ls.sort > --- if_vx.o --- > cc -c -O -pipe -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit > -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith > -Winline -Wuninitialized -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include > -DFAILSAFE -DCOMPAT_43 -DMSDOSFS -DNFS -DFFS -DINET -DKERNEL -include > opt_global.h ../../dev/vx/if_vx.c > --- cd9660_lookup.o --- > --- cd9660_bmap.o --- > cc -c -O -pipe -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit > -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith > -Winline -Wuninitialized -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include > -DFAILSAFE -DCOMPAT_43 -DMSDOSFS -DNFS -DFFS -DINET -DKERNEL -include > opt_global.h ../../isofs/cd9660/cd9660_bmap.c > --- cd9660_node.o --- > --- cd9660_bmap.o --- > In file included from ../../isofs/cd9660/cd9660_bmap.c:43: > ../../sys/vnode.h:429: vnode_if.h: No such file or directory > --- cd9660_lookup.o --- > cc -c -O -pipe -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit > -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith > -Winline -Wuninitialized -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include > -DFAILSAFE -DCOMPAT_43 -DMSDOSFS -DNFS -DFFS -DINET -DKERNEL -include > opt_global.h ../../isofs/cd9660/cd9660_lookup.c > --- cd9660_node.o --- > cc -c -O -pipe -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit > -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith > -Winline -Wuninitialized -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include > -DFAILSAFE -DCOMPAT_43 -DMSDOSFS -DNFS -DFFS -DINET -DKERNEL -include > opt_global.h ../../isofs/cd9660/cd9660_node.c > --- cd9660_bmap.o --- > In file included from ../../isofs/cd9660/cd9660_bmap.c:43: > ../../sys/vnode.h:450: warning: `struct vop_lease_args' declared inside > parameter list > ../../sys/vnode.h:450: warning: its scope is only this definition or declarat ion, > ../../sys/vnode.h:450: warning: which is probably not what you want. > ../../sys/vnode.h:464: warning: `struct vop_lease_args' declared inside > parameter list > ../../sys/vnode.h:489: warning: `struct vop_lookup_args' declared inside > parameter list > ../../sys/vnode.h:494: warning: `struct vop_islocked_args' declared inside > parameter list > ../../sys/vnode.h:495: warning: `struct vop_lock_args' declared inside > parameter list > ../../sys/vnode.h:496: warning: `struct vop_unlock_args' declared inside > parameter list > ../../sys/vnode.h:497: warning: `struct vop_islocked_args' declared inside > parameter list > ../../sys/vnode.h:498: warning: `struct vop_lock_args' declared inside > parameter list > ../../sys/vnode.h:499: warning: `struct vop_poll_args' declared inside > parameter list > ../../sys/vnode.h:500: warning: `struct vop_unlock_args' declared inside > parameter list > ../../sys/vnode.h:501: warning: `struct vop_pathconf_args' declared inside > parameter list > ../../sys/vnode.h:502: warning: `struct vop_revoke_args' declared inside > parameter list > ../../sys/vnode.h:503: warning: `struct vop_lock_args' declared inside > parameter list > --- cd9660_lookup.o --- > ... etc > > Even a make -j1 has this problem. A make without any -j option works fine. > Did I miss something? Any ideas? Yes.. do a 'make depend' first. The kernel makefile depends on the implied ordering of a single threaded build. Doing a 'make depend' finds all the dependencies so that nothing gets used by a parallel compile before it's created elsewhere. > Thanks, > Ben > Cheers, -Peter From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 08:49:18 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA28647 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 08:49:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from wakko.visint.co.uk (wakko.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA28631 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 08:49:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@visint.co.uk) Received: from dylan.visint.co.uk (dylan.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.180]) by wakko.visint.co.uk (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA20900 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:48:34 GMT Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:48:34 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Roome To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: rc564 on SMP Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Is anyone else running running the rc564 bovine client on SMP ? With -benchmark I get very poor results using the Pentium optimized client which runs two threads, it seems to think I'm going to be getting 182kkeys/sec, but I get 200kkeys/sec on the p166 on my desk which is running enough stuff to give it problems normally. Any ideas, anyone else running this ? Steve Steve Roome - Vision Interactive Ltd. Tel:+44(0)117 9730597 Home:+44(0)976 241342 WWW: http://dylan.visint.co.uk/ From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 09:07:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA00233 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:07:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA00225 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:07:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA20414; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 18:05:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Stephen Roome cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:48:34 GMT." Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 18:05:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20412.879959128@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Steph en Roome writes: > >Is anyone else running running the rc564 bovine client on SMP ? > Yes, you need to start separete copies for each CPU, our pthreads are not SMP'able yet. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 09:18:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA01509 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:18:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from wakko.visint.co.uk (wakko.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA01484 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:17:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@visint.co.uk) Received: from dylan.visint.co.uk (dylan.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.180]) by wakko.visint.co.uk (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA21063; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 17:14:41 GMT Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 17:14:41 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Roome To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-Reply-To: <20412.879959128@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message , Steph > en Roome writes: Yikes! > >Is anyone else running running the rc564 bovine client on SMP ? > > Yes, you need to start separete copies for each CPU, our pthreads are > not SMP'able yet. Ah, thought so, just let it finish all it's blocks off there and got 100kkeys/sec which wasn't too good (although it's been hammered with fileserving duties right now). Can I just start two of them in the same directory or do i need to have separate directories for each process to run in so it gets the buff-in.rc5 files separately or will it handle it ? Well, I'll try separate ones for now.. btw, I want to get this sorted in the next hour before I go home so that these two dual processor machines can get going, interested to see the stats tomorrow.. Oh and I'm allocating to Team-FreeBSD =) (hopefully another 1Mkeys/sec on average this should work out as from me.) Steve -- Steve Roome - Vision Interactive Ltd. Tel:+44(0)117 9730597 Home:+44(0)976 241342 WWW: http://dylan.visint.co.uk/ From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 09:31:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA02721 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:31:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA02714 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:31:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA20478; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 18:29:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Stephen Roome cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Nov 1997 17:14:41 GMT." Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 18:29:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20476.879960589@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Steph en Roome writes: >On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >Can I just start two of them in the same directory or do i need to have >separate directories for each process to run in so it gets the buff-in.rc5 >files separately or will it handle it ? I started them in different directories, just to be sure... >btw, I want to get this sorted in the next hour before I go home so that >these two dual processor machines can get going, interested to see the >stats tomorrow.. Oh and I'm allocating to Team-FreeBSD =) Well, OS/2 is still twice as far as us, so join in everybody... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 09:37:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA03533 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:37:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from home.dragondata.com (toasty@home.dragondata.com [204.137.237.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA03528 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:37:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toasty@home.dragondata.com) Received: (from toasty@localhost) by home.dragondata.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA08166; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:36:59 -0600 (CST) From: Kevin Day Message-Id: <199711191736.LAA08166@home.dragondata.com> Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-Reply-To: from Stephen Roome at "Nov 19, 97 04:48:34 pm" To: steve@visint.co.uk (Stephen Roome) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:36:59 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Is anyone else running running the rc564 bovine client on SMP ? > > With -benchmark I get very poor results using the Pentium optimized client > which runs two threads, it seems to think I'm going to be getting > 182kkeys/sec, but I get 200kkeys/sec on the p166 on my desk which is > running enough stuff to give it problems normally. > > Any ideas, anyone else running this ? > > Steve > > Steve Roome - Vision Interactive Ltd. > Tel:+44(0)117 9730597 Home:+44(0)976 241342 > WWW: http://dylan.visint.co.uk/ > > 1) A 3.0 optimized rc564 client will be out soon. 2) You'll do better having two seperate rc564 processes, than 1 set to run with 2 procs. (I'm not sure why this is). Kevin From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 09:40:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA03866 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:40:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from home.dragondata.com (toasty@home.dragondata.com [204.137.237.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA03805 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:40:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toasty@home.dragondata.com) Received: (from toasty@localhost) by home.dragondata.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA08396 for freebsd-smp@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:40:06 -0600 (CST) From: Kevin Day Message-Id: <199711191740.LAA08396@home.dragondata.com> Subject: Weird load average To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:40:06 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I had a runaway process go really bezerk. kill -9 wouldn't even kill it for a long time... Now this is happening. last pid: 10290; load averages: 1.01, 1.01, 1.00 11:38:42 34 processes: 2 running, 32 sleeping CPU states: 0.4% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 1.6% interrupt, 98.1% idle Mem: 2328K Active, 24M Inact, 8068K Wired, 13M Cache, 1298K Buf, 38M Free Swap: 164M Total, 64K Used, 164M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 10290 toasty 31 0 844K 876K CPU0 0 0:00 1.26% 0.53% top 3039 yorkie 28 0 944K 768K CPU1 1 0:24 0.04% 0.04% eggdrop 10288 toasty 10 0 492K 316K wait 0 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sh Where's the 1.00 coming from? Kevin From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 10:12:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA06661 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:12:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from wakko.visint.co.uk (wakko.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA06643 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:12:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@visint.co.uk) Received: from dylan.visint.co.uk (dylan.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.180]) by wakko.visint.co.uk (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA21289; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 18:10:58 GMT Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 18:10:58 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Roome To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-Reply-To: <20476.879960589@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I started them in different directories, just to be sure... Well, same here now, can't hurt! > Well, OS/2 is still twice as far as us, so join in everybody... Okay well, I've got a couple more machines to join in on this which I'll get running tomorrow, to make my contribution up to 8 cpu's.. Some stats from this that amazed me : (seriously) My desktop P166 (32Mb Ram) not much load at the moment is doing 200kkeys/sec. With 2 processes running on a dual processor P133, each process is doing 180kkeys/sec. The thing about this is that a p133 doing something like this that I would have thought of as processor intensive should only get 133/166 the speed of a P166 (okay so that's obvious). But 180,000 / 133 * 166 is 224,000. i.e. FreeBSD-SMP on very similar hardware here seems to be actually outperforming my desktop system. Maybe it's late in the day and I'm missing something obvious, but it's a nice sign to go home on. =) Steve -- Steve Roome - Vision Interactive Ltd. Tel:+44(0)117 9730597 Home:+44(0)976 241342 WWW: http://dylan.visint.co.uk/ From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 10:41:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA09692 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:41:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA09676 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:41:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA20590; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 19:40:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Stephen Roome cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Nov 1997 18:10:58 GMT." Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 19:40:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20588.879964802@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Steph en Roome writes: >My desktop P166 (32Mb Ram) not much load at the moment is doing >200kkeys/sec. > >With 2 processes running on a dual processor P133, each process is doing >180kkeys/sec. > >The thing about this is that a p133 doing something like this that I would >have thought of as processor intensive should only get 133/166 the speed >of a P166 (okay so that's obvious). > >But 180,000 / 133 * 166 is 224,000. > >i.e. FreeBSD-SMP on very similar hardware here seems to be actually >outperforming my desktop system. Maybe it's late in the day and I'm >missing something obvious, but it's a nice sign to go home on. =) This is not really CPU limited, but to a large extent CPU <--> RAM speed limited. You probably have different chipsets and or RAM type in the two machines. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 10:47:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA10341 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:47:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from proxy.lkb.lv (proxy.lkb.lv [195.244.134.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA10330 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:47:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ulmik@proxy.lkb.lv) Received: from cave.lkb.lv (cave.lkb.lv [195.244.134.13]) by proxy.lkb.lv (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA16276 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 20:46:59 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <34736C4B.30D0@proxy.lkb.lv> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 20:46:35 -0200 From: Uldis Mikelsons Reply-To: ulmik@proxy.lkb.lv Organization: AS Latvijas Krajbanka X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Stephen Roome wrote: > > Is anyone else running running the rc564 bovine client on SMP ? > > With -benchmark I get very poor results using the Pentium optimized client > which runs two threads, it seems to think I'm going to be getting > 182kkeys/sec, but I get 200kkeys/sec on the p166 on my desk which is > running enough stuff to give it problems normally. > > Any ideas, anyone else running this ? ----------- BEGIN FWD --------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: [rc5-coders] FreeBSD smp client Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 08:29:57 -0500 From: "Tim Charron" To: ulmik@proxy.lkb.lv > > I saw there excist linux smp client maybe its posible to get freebsd > >SMP client ? ftp://ftp.distributed.net/pub/rc5/v2.6401/rc56401-freebsd-x86-cli.tar .gz After working out some bugs, this is now multithreaded. -- Tim Tim Charron tcharron@ctfinance.com tcharron@interlog.com ----------- BEGIN FWD --------------------------------------------------------------- anyway after i tryd that version i stayd with 2 processes running in single cpu mode PS on cpq proliant 800 with dual ppro 180 they give ~430-44x kkey each CPU Uldis Mikelsons / alja ulmik@lkb.lv From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 10:51:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA10700 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:51:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA10695 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:51:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA20677; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 19:49:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: ulmik@proxy.lkb.lv cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Nov 1997 20:46:35 -0200." <34736C4B.30D0@proxy.lkb.lv> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 19:49:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20675.879965397@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <34736C4B.30D0@proxy.lkb.lv>, Uldis Mikelsons writes: > >anyway after i tryd that version i stayd with 2 processes running in >single cpu mode That is the way to do it. BTW, Team FreeBSD was #11 yesterday, we're getting into the right end of the list now :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 11:49:06 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA17721 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:49:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [206.156.231.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA17713 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:49:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from paul@elvis.mu.org) Received: (from paul@localhost) by elvis.mu.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA12087 for freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:48:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from paul) From: Paul Saab Message-Id: <199711191948.NAA12087@elvis.mu.org> Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-Reply-To: <20476.879960589@critter.freebsd.dk> from Poul-Henning Kamp at "Nov 19, 97 06:29:49 pm" To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:48:57 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31H (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message , Steph > en Roome writes: > >On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > >Can I just start two of them in the same directory or do i need to have > >separate directories for each process to run in so it gets the buff-in.rc5 > >files separately or will it handle it ? > > I started them in different directories, just to be sure... > > >btw, I want to get this sorted in the next hour before I go home so that > >these two dual processor machines can get going, interested to see the > >stats tomorrow.. Oh and I'm allocating to Team-FreeBSD =) > > Well, OS/2 is still twice as far as us, so join in everybody... We added 10 Pentium Pro's/II's to the FreeBSD effort and at night I kick in about another 10 more. We're moving up! Paul From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 11:52:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA18040 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:52:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA17996 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:51:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA20976; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 20:50:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Paul Saab cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:48:57 CST." <199711191948.NAA12087@elvis.mu.org> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 20:50:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20974.879969012@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199711191948.NAA12087@elvis.mu.org>, Paul Saab writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >We added 10 Pentium Pro's/II's to the FreeBSD effort and at night >I kick in about another 10 more. We're moving up! Cool! Way to go! -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 13:29:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA29639 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:29:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from romulus.hosteng.org (romulus.ihosteng.priv.no [195.0.205.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA29622 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:29:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ivar@romulus.hosteng.org) Received: from localhost (ivar@localhost) by romulus.hosteng.org (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA12892 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:28:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:28:33 +0100 (CET) From: Ivar Hosteng To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: rc564 on freeBSD 3.0 SMP Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I am experiencing kernel hangs and panics when I leave the rc564 processes running for more than 30-60 minutes. Sometimes I get a kernel panic and somthimes the kernel hangs compleatly. In the case of a kernel panic the system loocks up after I press ctrl+alt+escape. My system is a dual PPro 200Mhz system using the intel PR440FX motherboard. The system is completly stable if I don't try to run the rc564 program. I have suspected that the hangs only appear when both processors are working at 100% utilization so I wrote a small C program consisteing of a while (1) do ; loop. But I have left 2 processes running this program for days with no crashes. Does anyone else experience kernel hangs/crashes running the rc564 program on FreeBSD 3.0-current (the last cvsup sync was 18/11-97) and using the SMP kernel? Here is the output of the mptable -verbose program: =============================================================================== MPTable, version 2.0.15 looking for EBDA pointer @ 0x040e, found, searching EBDA @ 0x0009fc00 searching CMOS 'top of mem' @ 0x0009f800 (638K) searching default 'top of mem' @ 0x0009fc00 (639K) searching BIOS @ 0x000f0000 MP FPS found in BIOS @ physical addr: 0x000f8120 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MP Floating Pointer Structure: location: BIOS physical address: 0x000f8120 signature: '_MP_' length: 16 bytes version: 1.4 checksum: 0xe0 mode: Virtual Wire ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MP Config Table Header: physical address: 0x000f8130 signature: 'PCMP' base table length: 268 version: 1.4 checksum: 0xf8 OEM ID: 'INTEL ' Product ID: 'PR440FX ' OEM table pointer: 0x00000000 OEM table size: 0 entry count: 25 local APIC address: 0xfec08000 extended table length: 120 extended table checksum: 15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MP Config Base Table Entries: -- Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags 0 0x11 BSP, usable 6 1 9 0xfbff 12 0x11 AP, usable 6 1 9 0xfbff -- Bus: Bus ID Type 0 PCI 18 ISA -- I/O APICs: APIC ID Version State Address 13 0x11 usable 0xfec00000 -- I/O Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC ID PIN# ExtINT active-hi edge 18 0 13 0 INT active-hi edge 18 1 13 1 INT active-hi edge 18 3 13 3 INT active-hi edge 18 4 13 4 INT active-hi edge 18 5 13 5 INT active-hi edge 18 6 13 6 INT active-hi edge 18 7 13 7 INT active-hi edge 18 8 13 8 INT active-hi edge 18 9 13 9 INT active-hi edge 18 11 13 11 INT active-hi edge 18 12 13 12 INT active-hi edge 18 14 13 14 INT active-hi edge 18 15 13 15 INT active-lo level 0 19:A 13 19 INT active-lo level 0 15:A 13 17 INT active-lo level 0 11:A 13 16 INT active-lo level 0 9:A 13 17 INT active-lo level 0 6:A 13 18 -- Local Ints: Type Polarity Trigger Bus ID IRQ APIC ID PIN# ExtINT active-hi edge 18 0 255 0 NMI active-hi edge 0 0:A 255 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MP Config Extended Table Entries: -- bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xd4000 address range: 0x4000 -- bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xd8000 address range: 0x4000 -- bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xdc000 address range: 0x4000 -- bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0xa0000 address range: 0x20000 -- bus ID: 0 address type: memory address address base: 0x8000000 address range: 0xf8000000 -- bus ID: 0 address type: I/O address address base: 0x0 address range: 0x10000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # SMP kernel config file options: # Required: options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel options APIC_IO # Symmetric (APIC) I/O # Optional (built-in defaults will work in most cases): #options NCPU=2 # number of CPUs #options NBUS=2 # number of busses #options NAPIC=1 # number of IO APICs #options NINTR=24 # number of INTs =============================================================================== Regards, Ivar Hosteng email: ivar@hosteng.org From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 13:33:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA00211 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:33:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA00206 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:33:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA21294; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:31:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Ivar Hosteng cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on freeBSD 3.0 SMP In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:28:33 +0100." Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:31:55 +0100 Message-ID: <21292.879975115@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Ivar Hosteng writes: >I am experiencing kernel hangs and panics when I leave the rc564 processes >running for more than 30-60 minutes. Sometimes I get a kernel panic and >somthimes the kernel hangs compleatly. In the case of a kernel panic the >system loocks up after I press ctrl+alt+escape. In one word: Hardware. Round up the usual suspects: overclocking cooling RAM BIOS settings and so on. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 13:45:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA02006 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:45:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from romulus.hosteng.org (romulus.ihosteng.priv.no [195.0.205.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA01973 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:45:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ivar@romulus.hosteng.org) Received: from localhost (ivar@localhost) by romulus.hosteng.org (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA14523; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:44:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:44:09 +0100 (CET) From: Ivar Hosteng To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on freeBSD 3.0 SMP In-Reply-To: <21292.879975115@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In one word: Hardware. > > Round up the usual suspects: > > overclocking The cpu's are stamped 200Mhz and is running at 200Mhz. > cooling Both CPU's have cpu coolers with a working fan. They do not feel particulary hot to mee. > RAM There has been no evidence of any ram failures in the system and as I have stated it is running without failure when I dont try to run the rc564. There has been no problems with the system running the SMP versions of Linux for about 8 monts until may this year when I switched to FreeBSD 2.2.2 and ran it for 3 months until august when I made the switch to FreeBSD 3.0-current to use the second CPU that FreeBSD could'nt use. > BIOS settings There has been no changes in the bios settings while I have used the machine without trouble until I tried the rc564 program. I am resonably shure this is not a HW problem since it has not appeared for about 1 year of somtimes heavy usage until I started trying the rc564 program. Regards, Ivar Hosteng email: ivar@hosteng.org From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 13:47:13 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA02201 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:47:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA02193 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:47:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.7/8.8.8) id QAA05508; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:46:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from toor) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199711192146.QAA05508@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: rc564 on freeBSD 3.0 SMP In-Reply-To: from Ivar Hosteng at "Nov 19, 97 10:28:33 pm" To: ivar@romulus.hosteng.org (Ivar Hosteng) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:46:58 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Ivar Hosteng said: > > My system is a dual PPro 200Mhz system using the intel PR440FX > motherboard. The system is completly stable if I don't try to run the > rc564 program. > Same system that I use for my rc564 contribution. (Except it is overclocked to 233, set to 50NS ram speed.) I am also using idprio. > > I have suspected that the hangs only appear when both processors are > working at 100% utilization so I wrote a small C program consisteing of a > while (1) do ; loop. But I have left 2 processes running this program for > days with no crashes. > > Does anyone else experience kernel hangs/crashes running the rc564 program > on FreeBSD 3.0-current (the last cvsup sync was 18/11-97) and using the > SMP kernel? > I am also running FreeBSD-3.0-current with SMP. My guess is that maybe there is a RAM problem that is being tickled? (There aren't that many tunables in the bios on that motherboard.) -- John dyson@freebsd.org jdyson@nc.com From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 13:49:22 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA02420 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:49:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA02397 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:49:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA21344; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:47:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Ivar Hosteng cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on freeBSD 3.0 SMP In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:44:09 +0100." Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 22:47:42 +0100 Message-ID: <21342.879976062@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Ivar Hosteng writes: >> In one word: Hardware. >> >> Round up the usual suspects: > >I am resonably shure this is not a HW problem since it has not appeared >for about 1 year of somtimes heavy usage until I started trying the rc564 >program. And I'm very sure it is, because I have a SMP system running happily here, overclocked even :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 19 18:11:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA25692 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 18:11:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (winter@sasami.jurai.net [207.96.1.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA25656 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 18:11:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA06664; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 21:09:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 21:09:56 -0500 (EST) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: Stephen Roome , freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-Reply-To: <20476.879960589@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Well, OS/2 is still twice as far as us, so join in everybody... Anyone have a client for a Connection Machine? :) /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */ From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Nov 20 01:45:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA24572 for smp-outgoing; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 01:45:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from bsd.synx.com (rt.synx.com [194.167.81.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id BAA24504 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 01:44:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from remy@synx.com) Received: from s3.synx.com (s3 [192.1.1.247]) by bsd.synx.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA15768; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 10:48:18 +0100 Received: from rs1 by s3.synx.com id aa11302; 20 Nov 97 10:35 GMT Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 11:29:46 -0100 (GMT) From: Remy NONNENMACHER To: Kevin Day cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-Reply-To: <199711191736.LAA08166@home.dragondata.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Kevin Day wrote: > > 1) A 3.0 optimized rc564 client will be out soon. > Is there and works better (and faster) than FreeBSD generic one. Under a K6/233 running 3.0, i went from 330 kkeys/s to 375 kkeys/s. The K6 works better using the -c 1 (386/486) Cpu type than the 'K6 optimized code'. (It's due to the fact that the K6 translates [34]86 instructions to its RISC instruction set then rearranges execution paths to paralelize them a max. Wonderfull internals Datasheets from AMD !!). Someone said team-freebsd was #11. The ranking went 120/48/46/34 when i checked. Do i missed something ? Moral Question : seeking for idle cpus, I added an Idleing Windoze NT to team. Can this be considered as immoral ? In one hand, I can say i use the CPU only and that NT stuff is just a spawn helper. In another hand, It's an M$ shit. If someone feals hurt, i will stop it. From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Nov 20 04:43:13 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA02440 for smp-outgoing; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 04:43:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from wakko.visint.co.uk (wakko.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA02435 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 04:43:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@visint.co.uk) Received: from dylan.visint.co.uk (dylan.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.180]) by wakko.visint.co.uk (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA24394; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 12:42:42 GMT Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 12:42:42 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Roome To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-Reply-To: <20588.879964802@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message , Steph > en Roome writes: > >But 180,000 / 133 * 166 is 224,000. > > > >i.e. FreeBSD-SMP on very similar hardware here seems to be actually > >outperforming my desktop system. Maybe it's late in the day and I'm > >missing something obvious, but it's a nice sign to go home on. =) > > This is not really CPU limited, but to a large extent CPU <--> RAM > speed limited. You probably have different chipsets and or RAM type > in the two machines. I'm not sure this is as in depth an explanation as needed for me to be making sense of this! The chipset in the smp machine is HX, in the UP case it's VX, I wasn't aware there was that much of a speed difference. The RAM is identical 60ns EDO, with the same amount per processor. I'm not too worried about how this is the case, but it's good enough for me anyway! Steve. Steve Roome - Vision Interactive Ltd. Tel:+44(0)117 9730597 Home:+44(0)976 241342 WWW: http://dylan.visint.co.uk/ From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Nov 20 06:19:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA07595 for smp-outgoing; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 06:19:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from walter.doc.ic.ac.uk (ugMA1ZYE6xoV0jlEowa1kUaYAqoMhXTX@walter.doc.ic.ac.uk [146.169.2.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id GAA07579 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 06:19:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk) Received: from heron.doc.ic.ac.uk [146.169.2.31] ([5t0SHATLF+t5juzqBPmYcZBedp9lVzKX]) by walter.doc.ic.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 1.62 #3) id 0xYXRh-0000f4-00; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:19:05 +0000 Received: from oak25.doc.ic.ac.uk [146.169.17.25] ([ZdiHhtsIiTXpvd+E4MMInDT/vTcb9Aun]) by heron.doc.ic.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 1.62 #3) id 0xYXPR-0004RV-00; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:16:46 +0000 Received: from njs3 by oak25.doc.ic.ac.uk with local (Exim 1.62 #3) id 0xYXNf-000254-00; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:14:55 +0000 From: njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk (Niall Smart) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:14:53 +0000 In-Reply-To: "Matthew N. Dodd" "Re: rc564 on SMP" (Nov 19, 9:09pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: "Matthew N. Dodd" , Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP Cc: Stephen Roome , freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Nov 19, 9:09pm, "Matthew N. Dodd" wrote: } Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP > On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Well, OS/2 is still twice as far as us, so join in everybody... > > Anyone have a client for a Connection Machine? :) > Does anyone mind people registering machines not running FreeBSD under the FreeBSD team? I'm doing a project on the AP3000 supercomputer (128 * 300Mhz UltraSPARC connected with a 200MByte/sec network) and I might be able to persude the relevant people to let it contribute when it would be otherwise idle. Niall From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Nov 20 11:54:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA01521 for smp-outgoing; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 11:54:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from romulus.hosteng.org (romulus.ihosteng.priv.no [195.0.205.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA01510 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 11:54:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ivar@romulus.hosteng.org) Received: from localhost (ivar@localhost) by romulus.hosteng.org (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id UAA08549 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 20:53:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 20:53:44 +0100 (CET) From: Ivar Hosteng To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Problems with crashing rc564 program solved Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Last night I reported having problems with the kernel hanging when I tried to run the rc564 program on my dual ppro 200Mhz freebsd system. As I was told this had to bee related to faulty hardware. After checking into this I discovered that a co-worker had changed the cpu cooler on one of the ppros in my machine from one with a fan on it to a fan less one. After reposessing my old cpu cooler it now seems to work ok. What I need now is help to figure out some cruel punishment for the 'thief' that caused all the problems i have been experiencing ;->. Regards, Ivar Hosteng email: ivar@hosteng.org From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Nov 20 12:07:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA02532 for smp-outgoing; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 12:07:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA02521 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 12:07:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA26270; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 21:03:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk (Niall Smart) cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" , Stephen Roome , freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:14:53 GMT." Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 21:03:43 +0100 Message-ID: <26268.880056223@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Niall Smart writes: >On Nov 19, 9:09pm, "Matthew N. Dodd" wrote: >} Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP >> On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> > Well, OS/2 is still twice as far as us, so join in everybody... >> >> Anyone have a client for a Connection Machine? :) >> > >Does anyone mind people registering machines not running FreeBSD under >the FreeBSD team? I'm doing a project on the AP3000 supercomputer >(128 * 300Mhz UltraSPARC connected with a 200MByte/sec network) and >I might be able to persude the relevant people to let it contribute >when it would be otherwise idle. Ahh, what the heck, since you ask so nicely :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Nov 20 12:17:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA03697 for smp-outgoing; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 12:17:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA03678 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 12:17:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA26461; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 21:15:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Ivar Hosteng cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with crashing rc564 program solved In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 20 Nov 1997 20:53:44 +0100." Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 21:15:58 +0100 Message-ID: <26459.880056958@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Ivar Hosteng writes: >After checking into this I discovered that a co-worker had changed the cpu >cooler on one of the ppros in my machine from one with a fan on it to a >fan less one. > >After reposessing my old cpu cooler it now seems to work ok. > >What I need now is help to figure out some cruel punishment for the >'thief' that caused all the problems i have been experiencing ;->. Rename all his files so the names have even parity. Enjoy him groweling through stty(1) for hours... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Nov 20 12:47:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA05986 for smp-outgoing; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 12:47:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from bsd.synx.com (rt.synx.com [194.167.81.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA05973 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 12:47:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from remy@synx.com) Received: from s3.synx.com (s3 [192.1.1.247]) by bsd.synx.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA19926; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 21:46:33 +0100 Received: from rs1 by s3.synx.com id aa14946; 20 Nov 97 21:33 GMT Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 22:28:01 -0100 (GMT) From: Remy NONNENMACHER To: Ivar Hosteng cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with crashing rc564 program solved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 20 Nov 1997, Ivar Hosteng wrote: > > What I need now is help to figure out some cruel punishment for the > 'thief' that caused all the problems i have been experiencing ;->. > Have him compute by hand all the RC5 blocks lost by his fault !!! From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Nov 20 15:30:01 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA19077 for smp-outgoing; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 15:30:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA19036 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 15:29:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.8.8/frmug-2.1/nospam) with UUCP id AAA04046 for freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:29:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.8/keltia-2.13/nospam) id AAA03682; Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:11:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roberto) Message-ID: <19971121001112.30058@keltia.freenix.fr> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:11:12 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP References: <20476.879960589@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <20476.879960589@critter.freebsd.dk>; from Poul-Henning Kamp on Wed, Nov 19, 1997 at 06:29:49PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT ctm#3818 AMD-K6 MMX @ 208 MHz Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Poul-Henning Kamp: > Well, OS/2 is still twice as far as us, so join in everybody... I'm running two machines (one PPro/200 @ 460 kkeys/s and a K6/210 @ 300 kkeys/s) but I'm currently running for the "Bastard Operators From Hell" team... Maybe I'll switch to the FreeBSD team. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #49: Sat Nov 15 20:03:33 CET 1997 From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Nov 21 11:34:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA04721 for smp-outgoing; Fri, 21 Nov 1997 11:34:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from hyperreal.org (taz.hyperreal.org [204.62.130.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA04716 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 1997 11:34:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@hyperreal.org) Received: (qmail 25336 invoked from network); 21 Nov 1997 19:34:54 -0000 Received: from localhost.hyperreal.com (HELO brianb.organic.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.hyperreal.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 1997 19:34:54 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19971121104833.009ab4b0@hyperreal.org> X-Sender: brian@hyperreal.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 10:48:33 -0800 To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org From: Brian Behlendorf Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-Reply-To: <19971121001112.30058@keltia.freenix.fr> References: <20476.879960589@critter.freebsd.dk> <20476.879960589@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 12:11 AM 11/21/97 +0100, Ollivier Robert wrote: >According to Poul-Henning Kamp: >> Well, OS/2 is still twice as far as us, so join in everybody... > >I'm running two machines (one PPro/200 @ 460 kkeys/s and a K6/210 @ 300 >kkeys/s) but I'm currently running for the "Bastard Operators From Hell" >team... Maybe I'll switch to the FreeBSD team. It'd be great if we could get the "Japan FreeBSD User's Group" to join us - that would catapult us from #8 to #6 in the daily rate. Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- "it's a big world, with lots of records to play."-sig brian@hyperreal.org From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Nov 21 16:26:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA27462 for smp-outgoing; Fri, 21 Nov 1997 16:26:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from paert.tse-online.de (paert.tse-online.de [194.97.69.172]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA27451 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 1997 16:26:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ab@paert.tse-online.de) Received: (qmail 24303 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Nov 1997 00:37:16 -0000 Message-ID: <19971122013716.01190@paert.tse-online.de> Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 01:37:16 +0100 From: "A. Braukmann" To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP References: <20476.879960589@critter.freebsd.dk> <20476.879960589@critter.freebsd.dk> <19971121001112.30058@keltia.freenix.fr> <3.0.3.32.19971121104833.009ab4b0@hyperreal.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-md5; boundary=T4sUOijqQbZv57TR X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84 In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971121104833.009ab4b0@hyperreal.org>; from Brian Behlendorf on Fri, Nov 21, 1997 at 10:48:33AM -0800 Organization: TSE TeleService GmbH Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello, On Fri, Nov 21, 1997 at 10:48:33AM -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > >> Well, OS/2 is still twice as far as us, so join in everybody... here I come. Just fired up the 3.0 optimized client on my personal 2xPPro 200MHz machine. (Gigabyte 686DX, 128MB). > >I'm running two machines (one PPro/200 @ 460 kkeys/s and a K6/210 @ 300 > >kkeys/s) but I'm currently running for the "Bastard Operators From Hell" I'm wondering about the quite significant performance differences: The clients on my machine keep reporting numbers like this: [11/22/97 01:10:00 local] Total: 1 blocks 00:08:18.37 - [538623.48 keys/sec] [11/22/97 01:18:03 local] Total: 2 blocks 00:16:20.91 - [547317.72 keys/sec] There are running two instances of the rc564 v2.6401 client. I'm going to add the machine as fast as possible to the Team FreeBSD. If this succeeds, I will possibly add - our external WWW-server (K5/133; FreeBSD 2.x) - our gateway-machine (Cyrix 686/133; FreeBSD 2.2.2-stable) - several win95/winNT (uugghh) have a cracking day Andreas -- /// TSE TeleService GmbH | Gsf: Arne Reuter | /// Hovestrasse 14 | Andreas Braukmann | We do it with /// D-48351 Everswinkel | HRB: 1430, AG WAF | FreeBSD/SMP /// ------------------------------------------------------------------- /// PGP-Key: http://www.tse-online.de/~ab/public-key /// Key fingerprint: 12 13 EF BC 22 DD F4 B6 3C 25 C9 06 DC D3 45 9B --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia iQCVAwUBNHYpO3Kj4VjLq0fFAQGVsQP+LgrLifTZyF91mctLaGZXmU2aIojToEad 0deR5BbtHams3/Bqcnw+hZsdwY4UPiZTgpyzX44jHgC12neqQ6MoRY/K6DcwTCcT vrOcZYwF/iL0zvaBGrfyQ57tHqvBKrhBL/Wp/agKvZNOUGdcawPv8X6S0b11qFj2 DBja7qjyc+0= =IH0P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR-- From owner-freebsd-smp Sat Nov 22 02:27:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA27951 for smp-outgoing; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 02:27:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from ns.NL.net (ns.NL.net [193.78.240.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id CAA27944 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 02:27:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from benst@terminus.stuyts.nl) Received: from stuyts by ns.NL.net (5.65b/NLnet1.3) id AA13370; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 11:21:38 +0100 Received: from daneel.stuyts.nl (daneel.stuyts.nl [193.78.231.7]) by terminus.stuyts.nl (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA06118 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 11:19:42 +0100 (MET) Received: (from benst@localhost) by daneel.stuyts.nl (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA05450 for freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 11:18:57 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199711221018.LAA05450@daneel.stuyts.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2) X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 3.3 (Enhance 1.2) Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.118.2) From: Ben Stuyts Date: Sat, 22 Nov 97 11:18:54 +0100 To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: apic_ipi might be stuck Reply-To: ben@stuyts.nl Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Dear list, I saw the following message occur on my SMP system: apic_ipi might be stuck It seems to run fine though. Any ideas what this might be? This is a Gigabyte 586DX with dual P5-166 MMX. The source tree has been cvsupped on the 17th I think. Dmesg says: Copyright (c) 1992-1997 FreeBSD Inc. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Nov 18 22:00:03 MET 1997 benst@terminus.stuyts.nl:/usr/source/src/sys/compile/TERMINUS-SMP CPU: Pentium (586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x543 Stepping=3 Features=0x8003bf real memory = 67108864 (65536K bytes) avail memory = 62832640 (61360K bytes) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00030010, at 0xfee00000 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00030010, at 0xfee00000 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00170011, at 0xfec00000 Probing for devices on PCI bus 0: chip0: rev 0x03 on pci0.0.0 chip1: rev 0x01 on pci0.7.0 ide_pci0: rev 0x00 on pci0.7.1 de0: rev 0x11 int a irq 17 on pci0.9.0 de0: SMC 21041 [10Mb/s] pass 1.1 de0: address 00:00:c0:1f:54:e8 vga0: rev 0x02 int a irq 18 on pci0.10.0 ahc0: rev 0x00 int a irq 19 on pci0.12.0 ahc0: Using left over BIOS settings ahc0: aic7880 Wide Channel, SCSI Id=7, 16 SCBs ahc0: waiting for scsi devices to settle scbus0 at ahc0 bus 0 sd0 at scbus0 target 1 lun 0 sd0: type 0 fixed SCSI 2 sd0: Direct-Access 4134MB (8467200 512 byte sectors) sd0: with 8205 cyls, 6 heads, and an average 171 sectors/track sd1 at scbus0 target 3 lun 0 sd1: type 0 fixed SCSI 2 sd1: Direct-Access 810MB (1660299 512 byte sectors) sd1: with 3653 cyls, 4 heads, and an average 113 sectors/track cd0 at scbus0 target 4 lun 0 cd0: type 5 removable SCSI 2 cd0: CD-ROM can't get the size worm0 at scbus0 target 5 lun 0 worm0: type 5 removable SCSI 2 worm0: Write-Once Probing for devices on the ISA bus: sc0 at 0x60-0x6f irq 1 on motherboard sc0: VGA color <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on isa sio0: type 16550A sio1 at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa sio1: type 16550A lpt0 at 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa lpt0: Interrupt-driven port lp0: TCP/IP capable interface psm0 at 0x60-0x64 irq 12 on motherboard psm0: device ID 0 fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 on isa wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): wd0: 2014MB (4124736 sectors), 4092 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S npx0 on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface sb0 at 0x220 irq 5 drq 1 on isa snd0: sbxvi0 at ? drq 5 on isa snd0: sbmidi0 at 0x330 on isa snd0: awe0 at 0x620 on isa AWE32 not found AWE32: not detected opl0 at 0x388 on isa snd0: APIC_IO: routing 8254 via 8259 on pin 0 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! de0: enabling BNC port apic_ipi might be stuck sio0: 4 more silo overflows (total 4) sio0: 2 more silo overflows (total 6) With kind regards, Ben Stuyts