From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Dec 15 17:25:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA06878 for smp-outgoing; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 17:25:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from intercore.com (num1sun.intercore.com [199.181.243.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA06861 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 17:25:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robin@intercore.com) Received: (robin@localhost) by intercore.com (8.7.1/8.6.4) id UAA04412; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 20:20:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19971215202026.60284@num1sun.intercore.com> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 20:20:26 -0500 From: Robin Cutshaw To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: SMP panic 3.0-971208-SNAP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.79 Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk After a logout but before a login prompt: page fault at setlock+0x7: xchgl $ecx,0(%eax) ecx = 0x1000001 eax = 0 stack trace: setlock vop_stdislocked ufs_vnoperate vfs_msync sync current process is 4 (update). This is on a Dell dual P133. robin -- ---- Robin Cutshaw internet: robin@interlabs.com robin@intercore.com Internet Labs, Inc. BellNet: 404-817-9787 robin@XFree86.Org "Time is just one damn thing after another" -- PBS/Nova ---- -- From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Dec 16 17:00:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA17745 for smp-outgoing; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 17:00:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu (root@louis.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu [146.245.1.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA17708 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 17:00:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dayton@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu) Received: (from dayton@localhost) by sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu (8.8.7/8.8.4) id QAA14208; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 16:28:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 16:28:34 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199712162128.QAA14208@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu> From: Dayton Clark To: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Goliath, more problems Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Folks, More woes with my 4x200ppro Goliath board. I started clean, installing the 971208 snap (which seems to be the current favorite). I made a kernel with NCPU=4 and NBUS=3 as recommended by mptable. My attempts to make buildworld follow. As you can see, make sporadically fails to find commands. When entering commands interactively, you sometimes get a missing one, but not as often as here. Buildworld seems to work (I didn't wait for it to complete) with the UP kernel. I will look into this (as time permits), but I welcome suggestions. So far I've found out that the ": not found" comes from a call to execvp() in make (compat.c). The error code returned by execvp() alternates between ENOENT and EACCES, with EACCESS occurring more often. There's a comment about a race condition in /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/exec.c (~line 280), but I don't think it applies to this problem. Any suggestions as to where I might look? Has this been encountered before? thanks dayton Dayton Clark CIS Department dayton@brooklyn.cuny.edu Brooklyn College/CUNY 1-718-951-4811 Brooklyn, New York 11210 1-718-951-4842 (fax) # cd /usr/src # . /root/.profile # make buildworld -------------------------------------------------------------- echo: not found *** Error code 1 Stop. # make buildworld -------------------------------------------------------------- Cleaning up the temporary build tree -------------------------------------------------------------- mkdir -p /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp mkdir: not found *** Error code 1 Stop. # make buildworld echo: not found *** Error code 1 Stop. ...and so on # make buildworld -------------------------------------------------------------- Cleaning up the temporary build tree -------------------------------------------------------------- mkdir -p /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/ rm -rf /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp -------------------------------------------------------------- Making make -------------------------------------------------------------- mkdir -p /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin cd /usr/src/usr.bin/make && PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin BISON_SIMPLE=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/share/misc/bison.simple COMPILER_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/libexec:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin GCC_EXEC_PREFIX=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib NOEXTRADEPEND=t make DESTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp -I/usr/src/share/mk cleandir obj /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/make created for /usr/src/usr.bin/make ... much normal output removed cc -O -I/usr/src/usr.bin/make -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -o make arch.o buf.o compat.o cond.o dir.o for.o hash.o job.o main.o make.o parse.o str.o suff.o targ.o var.o util.o lstAppend.o lstAtEnd.o lstAtFront.o lstClose.o lstConcat.o lstDatum.o lstDeQueue.o lstDestroy.o lstDupl.o lstEnQueue.o lstFind.o lstFindFrom.o lstFirst.o lstForEach.o lstForEachFrom.o lstInit.o lstInsert.o lstIsAtEnd.o lstIsEmpty.o lstLast.o lstMember.o lstNext.o lstOpen.o lstRemove.o lstReplace.o lstSucc.o install -c -s -o bin -g bin -m 555 make /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin rm -f a.out Errs errs mklog make arch.o buf.o compat.o cond.o dir.o for.o hash.o job.o main.o make.o parse.o str.o suff.o targ.o var.o util.o lstAppend.o lstAtEnd.o lstAtFront.o lstClose.o lstConcat.o lstDatum.o lstDeQueue.o lstDestroy.o lstDupl.o lstEnQueue.o lstFind.o lstFindFrom.o lstFirst.o lstForEach.o lstForEachFrom.o lstInit.o lstInsert.o lstIsAtEnd.o lstIsEmpty.o lstLast.o lstMember.o lstNext.o lstOpen.o lstRemove.o lstReplace.o lstSucc.o rm -f .depend rm -f /usr/src/usr.bin/make/GRTAGS /usr/src/usr.bin/make/GTAGS echo: not found *** Error code 1 Stop. # make buildworld -------------------------------------------------------------- echo: not found *** Error code 1 ... and so on From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Dec 17 05:34:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA10886 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 05:34:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from inet16.us.oracle.com (inet16.us.oracle.com [192.86.155.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA10870 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 05:34:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from MOLAGAPP.IN.oracle.com.ofcmail@in.oracle.com) Received: from dwarpal.in.oracle.com (dwarpal.in.oracle.com [152.69.176.11]) by inet16.us.oracle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA23150 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 05:34:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by dwarpal.in.oracle.com (8.6.13/37.8) id JAA00673; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 09:06:33 -0500 Message-Id: <199712171406.JAA00673@dwarpal.in.oracle.com> Date: 17 Dec 97 10:46:34 +0330 From: "MUTHU" To: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Compile dependencies MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Oracle InterOffice (version 4.0.5.1.55) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I was compiling the GENERIC 3.0 or SMP-GENERIC 3.0 config file in the machine which has 2.2.2 Freebsd version. The compile failed becase it could not find the structure defined namely "struct ether_multistep" if /usr/src/sys/pci/if_de.c static void tulip_addr_filter( tulip_softc_t * const sc) { #if defined(__FreeBSD__) && __FreeBSD__ >= 3 struct ifmultiaddr *ifma; u_char *addrp; #else struct ether_multistep step; struct ether_multi *enm; #endif This struture namely "ether_multistep" is not defined anywhere. Is is enough if we have FreeBSD version 3.0 C compiler to overcome such problems or do I have to upgrade the system to version 3.0 to compile the sources of version 3.0. Can anybody help me? Regards, Muthu. O.L. From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Dec 17 16:49:23 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA01831 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 16:49:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from mail.sltic.com (www.sltic.com [207.51.206.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA01814 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 16:49:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from info@sltic.com) From: info@sltic.com Received: from slartibartfast [207.51.206.46] by mail.sltic.com (SMTPD32-4.02) id A44245D40096; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 18:54:26 CST6CDT Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19971217185304.04d04340@sltic.com> X-Sender: info@sltic.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 18:53:04 -0600 To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: 2.2.5 on a HP Netserver Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've installed freebsd 2.2.5 on a HP Netserver LS2 (2 P100s). I recompiled the kernel with the options output by mptable. No errors on the recompile and no errors on reboot. But the 2nd CPU is not recognized (is by BIOS) and is not used. I looked at the machdep.c patch but can't make sense of it. Is this what I need to work on to get SMP working? Anyone using a similiar hardware setup and can offer any assistance? TIA, Bruce info@sltic.com From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Dec 17 18:08:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA07084 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 18:08:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from Ilsa.StevesCafe.com (Ilsa.StevesCafe.com [205.168.119.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA07076 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 18:08:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com) Received: from Ilsa.StevesCafe.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Ilsa.StevesCafe.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA25844; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 19:08:22 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199712180208.TAA25844@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 From: Steve Passe To: info@sltic.com cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2.5 on a HP Netserver In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 Dec 1997 18:53:04 CST." <3.0.1.32.19971217185304.04d04340@sltic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 19:08:21 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, > I've installed freebsd 2.2.5 on a HP Netserver LS2 > (2 P100s). I recompiled the kernel with the options > output by mptable. No errors on the recompile and > no errors on reboot. But the 2nd CPU is not recognized > (is by BIOS) and is not used. I looked at the machdep.c > patch but can't make sense of it. Is this what I need to > work on to get SMP working? Anyone using a similiar > hardware setup and can offer any assistance? 2.2.5 is NOT smp capable. you need to use 3.0 to get SMP functionality. -- Steve Passe | powered by smp@csn.net | Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Dec 17 18:23:38 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA08165 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 18:23:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.196.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA08160 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 18:23:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp) Received: by outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp id AA15499; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 11:22:30 +0900 Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.7.6+2.6Wbeta7/3.4W/zodiac-May96) with ESMTP id LAA20440; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 11:29:33 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199712180229.LAA20440@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> To: info@sltic.com Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: 2.2.5 on a HP Netserver In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Dec 1997 18:53:04 CST." <3.0.1.32.19971217185304.04d04340@sltic.com> References: <3.0.1.32.19971217185304.04d04340@sltic.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 11:29:32 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >I've installed freebsd 2.2.5 on a HP Netserver LS2 >(2 P100s). I recompiled the kernel with the options >output by mptable. No errors on the recompile and >no errors on reboot. But the 2nd CPU is not recognized >(is by BIOS) and is not used. I looked at the machdep.c >patch but can't make sense of it. Is this what I need to >work on to get SMP working? Anyone using a similiar >hardware setup and can offer any assistance? SMP isn't supported by 2.2.5; it is only available with 3.0-current. Kazu From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Dec 18 07:18:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA24970 for smp-outgoing; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 07:18:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from mail.sltic.com (www.sltic.com [207.51.206.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id HAA24964 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 07:18:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from info@sltic.com) From: info@sltic.com Received: from slartibartfast [207.51.206.46] by mail.sltic.com (SMTPD32-4.02) id AFFEA3E80104; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 09:23:42 CST6CDT Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19971218092220.04d42740@sltic.com> X-Sender: info@sltic.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 09:22:20 -0600 To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2.5 on a HP Netserver In-Reply-To: <199712180229.LAA20440@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> References: <3.0.1.32.19971217185304.04d04340@sltic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 11:29 AM 12/18/97 +0900, you wrote: >>I've installed freebsd 2.2.5 on a HP Netserver LS2 > >SMP isn't supported by 2.2.5; it is only available with 3.0-current. > >Kazu > > Thanks, that thought briefly crossed my mind, don't know why it didn't stick. I'll give that a try. Bruce info@sltic.com From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Dec 18 10:47:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA12647 for smp-outgoing; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 10:47:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from enlaces.c5.cl (rdeiriar@enlaces.c5.cl [146.83.4.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA12634 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 10:47:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdeiriar@enlaces.c5.cl) Received: (from rdeiriar@localhost) by enlaces.c5.cl (8.8.4/8.7.3) id PAA10593 for smp@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 15:38:44 -0300 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 15:38:44 -0300 From: Roberto de Iriarte Message-Id: <199712181838.PAA10593@enlaces.c5.cl> To: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Simple Question (s) Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I am assembling a dual pentium pro machine based on the INTEl PR 440 FX motherboard, to (hopefully) run FreeBSD SMP on it. Unfortunately, as i am in CHILE ,i must import the motherboard (nothing like that availible here). I 've been unable to find out if the VRM needed for two cpu operation is included in the 'Boxed' package. If it does, or if you can give me some sources for it in the US, i'll be very thankfull Sorry for the out of scope question, but the availible documentation on this subject is very scarce. BTW , any advice on fans with tachometer for this MB (or is this feature unusefull). Thanks in advance Roberto de Iriarte K. rdeiriar@enlaces.c5.cl From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Dec 19 16:57:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA07842 for smp-outgoing; Fri, 19 Dec 1997 16:57:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from mail.sltic.com (www.sltic.com [207.51.206.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA07837 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 1997 16:56:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from info@sltic.com) From: info@sltic.com Received: from slartibartfast [207.51.206.46] by mail.sltic.com (SMTPD32-4.02) id A91C6D710102; Fri, 19 Dec 1997 19:02:20 CST6CDT Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19971219190058.04de66f0@sltic.com> X-Sender: info@sltic.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 19:00:58 -0600 To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: cpu monitor Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've now (finally!) got SMP recompiled and running. Is there any good cpu monitor, such as 'top', that I could use to monitor both processors? 'top' indicates that a process is running on CPU0 or CPU1 but the system time on CPU1 process is displayed as %0.03 or so. I'm testing the system with the rc564 client and this will use 100%. I'd like to see what happening on both. Any pointer, urls appreciated. Thanks, Bruce info@sltic.com From owner-freebsd-smp Sat Dec 20 07:34:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA22788 for smp-outgoing; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 07:34:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from abby.skypoint.net (abby.skypoint.net [199.86.32.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA22777 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 07:34:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bruce@zuhause.mn.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by abby.skypoint.net (8.8.7/jl 1.3) with UUCP id JAA11017; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 09:34:21 -0600 (CST) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by zuhause.mn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA10365; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 09:31:46 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 09:31:46 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199712201531.JAA10365@zuhause.mn.org> From: Bruce Albrecht To: info@sltic.com Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cpu monitor In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19971219190058.04de66f0@sltic.com> References: <3.0.1.32.19971219190058.04de66f0@sltic.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "New York" XEmacs Lucid Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk info@sltic.com writes: > I've now (finally!) got SMP recompiled and running. > Is there any good cpu monitor, such as 'top', that I > could use to monitor both processors? 'top' indicates > that a process is running on CPU0 or CPU1 but the system > time on CPU1 process is displayed as %0.03 or so. I'm > testing the system with the rc564 client and this will > use 100%. I'd like to see what happening on both. Any > pointer, urls appreciated. I'm running SMP with two rc564 clients, and top shows each process as getting about 49% of the CPU. From owner-freebsd-smp Sat Dec 20 07:56:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA24009 for smp-outgoing; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 07:56:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from mail.sltic.com (www.sltic.com [207.51.206.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id HAA23997 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 07:56:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from info@sltic.com) From: info@sltic.com Received: from slartibartfast [207.51.206.46] by mail.sltic.com (SMTPD32-4.02) id ABEF905600CE; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:01:51 CST6CDT Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19971220100029.04e194d0@sltic.com> X-Sender: info@sltic.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:00:29 -0600 To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cpu monitor In-Reply-To: <199712201531.JAA10365@zuhause.mn.org> References: <3.0.1.32.19971219190058.04de66f0@sltic.com> <3.0.1.32.19971219190058.04de66f0@sltic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 09:31 AM 12/20/97 -0600, you wrote: >info@sltic.com writes: > > I've now (finally!) got SMP recompiled and running. > > Is there any good cpu monitor, such as 'top', that I > > could use to monitor both processors? 'top' indicates > > that a process is running on CPU0 or CPU1 but the system > > time on CPU1 process is displayed as %0.03 or so. I'm > > testing the system with the rc564 client and this will > > use 100%. I'd like to see what happening on both. Any > > pointer, urls appreciated. > >I'm running SMP with two rc564 clients, and top shows each process as >getting about 49% of the CPU. > > Yea, oops, the above description was with one rc564 going. Running two, I see one listed at 50%, the other at %48. What I'd like is each CPU represented individually. Something like: CPU0 %user %nice %system ...... etc. CPU1 %user %nice %system ...... Then in the process table, the data could indicate which CPU the process is actually running on with the proper display of usage. BTW, I ran "rc564 -benchmark" with one process and then with two, in both cases the results were 136000 keys/sec which confirms both CPUs are used fully. Bruce info@sltic.com From owner-freebsd-smp Sat Dec 20 10:37:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA03165 for smp-outgoing; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:37:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA03159 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:37:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA14565; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:37:09 -0800 (PST) To: info@sltic.com cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cpu monitor In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:00:29 CST." <3.0.1.32.19971220100029.04e194d0@sltic.com> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:37:09 -0800 Message-ID: <14562.882643029@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I see one listed at 50%, the other at %48. What I'd like is each CPU > represented individually. Something like: > CPU0 %user %nice %system ...... etc. > CPU1 %user %nice %system ...... Send us your diffs. That's how things like this happen. :-) Jordan From owner-freebsd-smp Sat Dec 20 12:44:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA12868 for smp-outgoing; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 12:44:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from miro.bestweb.net (miro.bestweb.net [208.197.0.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA12853 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 12:44:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aryder@bestweb.net) Received: from bestweb.net (spline@sapphire.corp.syric.com [209.94.111.26]) by miro.bestweb.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA01365 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:45:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <349C2E3B.D0AFDC6A@bestweb.net> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 15:44:43 -0500 From: Andrew Ryder X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Tomcat IVD Question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I was looking on the SMP Page off of Freebsd.org, and didnt notice that the Tyan Tomcat IVD (Support two pentium chips) was supported. My vendor noted it was a newer motherboard but wondered if anyone had tested a freebsd 3.0 snap on it, it seems that other tyans have no problems though. I dont have the system yet but do want to test out the 3.0 smp support on the machine. I am not on the list so if you could email me back here, it would be appricated. Thanks -- /* Andrew Ryder - aryder@bestweb.net * FreeBSD - turning PC's into workstations * Windows - turning PC's into scrap metal */ From owner-freebsd-smp Sat Dec 20 13:12:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA14697 for smp-outgoing; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 13:12:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from fang.cs.sunyit.edu (umji@fang.cs.sunyit.edu [192.52.220.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA14684 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 13:12:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from umji@fang.cs.sunyit.edu) Received: from localhost (umji@localhost) by fang.cs.sunyit.edu (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA09937; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 17:13:43 GMT Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 17:13:43 +0000 (GMT) From: Michael Imor To: Andrew Ryder cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tomcat IVD Question In-Reply-To: <349C2E3B.D0AFDC6A@bestweb.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm using the Tomcat IV with 2 Pentium 233s right now. Works great for me under FreeBSD 3.0-SMP Mike On Sat, 20 Dec 1997, Andrew Ryder wrote: > I was looking on the SMP Page off of Freebsd.org, and didnt notice that > the Tyan Tomcat IVD (Support two pentium chips) was supported. My vendor > noted it was a newer motherboard but wondered if anyone had tested a > freebsd 3.0 snap on it, it seems that other tyans have no problems > though. I dont have the system yet but do want to test out the 3.0 smp > support on the machine. I am not on the list so if you could email me > back here, it would be appricated. > > Thanks > -- > /* Andrew Ryder - aryder@bestweb.net > * FreeBSD - turning PC's into workstations > * Windows - turning PC's into scrap metal > */ > From owner-freebsd-smp Sat Dec 20 19:14:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA03296 for smp-outgoing; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 19:14:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from rma.edu (rma.edu [207.0.141.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA03290 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 19:14:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjalwan@rma.edu) Received: from rma.edu ([207.0.141.214]) by rma.edu with ESMTP (IPAD 2.0) id 2532400 ; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 22:17:05 -0500 Message-ID: <349CB3AD.1110A5EE@rma.edu> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 22:14:05 -0800 From: Michael Alwan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Ryder CC: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tomcat IVD Question References: <349C2E3B.D0AFDC6A@bestweb.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Andrew Ryder wrote: > > I was looking on the SMP Page off of Freebsd.org, and didnt notice that > the Tyan Tomcat IVD (Support two pentium chips) was supported. My vendor > noted it was a newer motherboard but wondered if anyone had tested a > freebsd 3.0 snap on it I've run several SNAP's (latest 12/17/97) on this board with 2xP5 200MMX, 64MB RAM. Beautiful system. Michael Alwan From owner-freebsd-smp Sat Dec 20 22:05:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA10864 for smp-outgoing; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 22:05:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from abby.skypoint.net (abby.skypoint.net [199.86.32.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA10854 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 22:05:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bruce@zuhause.mn.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by abby.skypoint.net (8.8.7/jl 1.3) with UUCP id AAA03211; Sun, 21 Dec 1997 00:05:16 -0600 (CST) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by zuhause.mn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA00653; Sun, 21 Dec 1997 00:03:59 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 1997 00:03:59 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199712210603.AAA00653@zuhause.mn.org> From: Bruce Albrecht To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: info@sltic.com, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cpu monitor In-Reply-To: <14562.882643029@time.cdrom.com> References: <3.0.1.32.19971220100029.04e194d0@sltic.com> <14562.882643029@time.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "New York" XEmacs Lucid Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jordan K. Hubbard writes: > > I see one listed at 50%, the other at %48. What I'd like is each CPU > > represented individually. Something like: > > CPU0 %user %nice %system ...... etc. > > CPU1 %user %nice %system ...... > > Send us your diffs. That's how things like this happen. :-) It would be better to send any diffs for top to William LeFebvre (wnl@groupsys.com), since he's the maintainer of top. Even the latest version of top (3.5 beta 7) doesn't break it down by CPU for SMP systems (at least not for FreeBSD or Solaris).