From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 6 00:56:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA13336 for stable-outgoing; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 00:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA13299 for ; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 00:55:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.5/8.6.9) id RAA19719; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 17:37:16 +1000 Date: Sun, 6 Jul 1997 17:37:16 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199707060737.RAA19719@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au Subject: Re: stat_flags.c stops make world Cc: edsweeney@caro.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Just before this gets out of hand, this is _NOT_ the problem. > >The problem is that install(1) is built very early on, before the includes >are installed (for obvious reasons). > >install(1) needs these flags defined, so you have to manually run >'make includes' before building the world. Another is that install doesn't really know about the new flags. The build fails because ls knows about them and an ls module is used. It should fail for xinstall.c too :-). Bruce From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 6 11:29:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA00950 for stable-outgoing; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 11:29:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcpsj.pfcs.com (SMqfncksg8kZl8xzV/LXDl/oObVDDQXs@harlan.fred.net [205.252.219.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA00943 for ; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 11:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mumps.pfcs.com (mumps.pfcs.com [192.52.69.11]) by pcpsj.pfcs.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA29032; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 14:20:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost by mumps.pfcs.com with SMTP id AA25553 (5.67b/IDA-1.5); Sun, 6 Jul 1997 14:19:48 -0400 To: Michael Smith Cc: edsweeney@caro.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stat_flags.c stops make world In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 06 Jul 1997 15:42:33 +0930." <199707060612.PAA24016@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Date: Sun, 06 Jul 1997 14:19:46 -0300 Message-Id: <25551.868213186@mumps.pfcs.com> From: Harlan Stenn Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Mike's right, of course. I wasn't anywhere near clear enough in my message. Sorry for the extra confusion and paranoia. H From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 7 06:59:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA13775 for stable-outgoing; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 06:59:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from soul.irex.urc.ac.ru (soul.irex.urc.ac.ru [193.233.85.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA13747 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 06:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from soul.irex.urc.ac.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by soul.irex.urc.ac.ru (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA07177 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 20:01:13 GMT Message-ID: <33C14B08.3F54BC7E@urc.ac.ru> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 20:01:12 +0000 From: Anton Voronin Organization: URC FREEnet X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: login.conf limits Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm not sure, do all the features of login.conf work? I tried to set some resource limits for users: daytime, sessiontime and times.allow - only the last one seems to work. Is it possible to learn which login.conf parameters are not realized yet (if any)? And what means the "@" at the end of some capability names, so as I can't find it in a man on login.conf. Best regards, Anton -- ====================================================================== Anton Voronin http://www.urc.ac.ru/~anton/ Ural Regional Center of FREEnet; Technical University of Chelyabinsk Phone: +7 (3512) 65-49-92 (office) E-mail: anton@urc.ac.ru ====================================================================== From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 9 00:11:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA01987 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 00:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cypress.netc.net.au (cypress.netc.net.au [203.13.34.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA01974 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 00:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by cypress.netc.net.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA16683 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 17:10:18 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 17:10:18 +1000 (EST) From: David Lay To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: SIGBUS under 2.2.2-RELEASE Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I recently added 4MB RAM to my machine (Intel 486dx2-66 ISA/VLB) taking it from 16MB to 20MB. It's running 2.2.2-RELEASE, and I compiled a new kernel with BOUNCE_BUFFERS enabled. Since then I seem to be getting a lot of bus errors. They occur mostly, but not only, when I try to login. If I manage to login I see from /var/log/messages that it's my login shell, tcsh, that's getting SIGBUS. I've also seen the C compiler terminate with SIGBUS, but it mainly seems to affect tcsh. I've also noticed that the bus errors occur more frequently once the machine has been up a few days. After a reboot I can usually login succesasfuly straight away, but after two or three days, I get SIGBUS on about 95% of all login attempts. What exactly is a bus error (as opposed to a segmentation fault), and why would I be getting so many of them now ? -- David Lay dave@netc.net.au From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 9 00:47:32 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA03559 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 00:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA03551 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 00:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) id RAA12649; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 17:17:14 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199707090747.RAA12649@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: SIGBUS under 2.2.2-RELEASE In-Reply-To: from David Lay at "Jul 9, 97 05:10:18 pm" To: dave@netc.net.au (David Lay) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 17:17:14 +0930 (CST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk David Lay stands accused of saying: > I recently added 4MB RAM to my machine (Intel 486dx2-66 ISA/VLB) taking it > from 16MB to 20MB. It's running 2.2.2-RELEASE, and I compiled a new > kernel with BOUNCE_BUFFERS enabled. Do you actually need bouncebuffers? > What exactly is a bus error (as opposed to a segmentation fault), and why > would I be getting so many of them now ? Perhaps the extra memory you added is faulty? > David Lay -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[ From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 9 07:53:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA18127 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 07:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gatekeeper.barcode.co.il (gatekeeper.barcode.co.il [192.116.93.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA18121 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 07:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nadav@localhost) by gatekeeper.barcode.co.il (8.8.5/8.6.12) id RAA17990; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 17:52:39 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 17:52:39 +0300 (IDT) From: Nadav Eiron To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: double faults on install floppy - DEC Venturis Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi there, I've been trying to install a recent RELENG snapshot since yesterday on a DEC Venturis FX 5133 (133MHz Pentium, 1.2GB EIDE disk, 48MB RAM, DE500 FastEthernet). Both 2.2-970705-RELENG and 2.2-970708-RELENG boot floppies panic with double fault right after devices are probed. I've tested two identical machines, so I don't believe it's a hardware problem. However, on the same two machines, both 2.2.2-RELEASE and 2.2-970618-RELENG boot fine. The 9707xx floppies boot fine on a 486 I have here, so it's not that floppies are bad. What went wrong? I'll be happy to test boot floppies from other dates if someone tells me when the suspected change that broke the install floppy was. Nadav From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 9 10:01:06 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA24740 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 10:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tarkin.smlab.com (tarkin.smlab.com [208.132.36.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA24729 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 10:00:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r2d2.smlab.com (mike@r2d2.smlab.com [192.168.2.7]) by tarkin.smlab.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA10234 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 13:05:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (mike@localhost) by r2d2.smlab.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id MAA32536 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 12:59:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 12:59:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike Nowlin To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: limit socket connections on 2.1.7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Looking for a bit of information............ I'd like to limit the number of incoming TCP connections to a range of port numbers (8000-8999). ("Limit port 8000 to 4 connections, 8001 to 10 connections, and 8002 to 13 connections" type of thing...) With any luck, this capability is built into the 2.1.7 kernel, and I just have to wave my magic wand and activate it. If not........ ......... How?? Kernel modifications? Any pointers would be greatly appreciated... --Mike mike@smlab.com From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 9 10:53:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA27503 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 10:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell.uniserve.com (tom@shell.uniserve.com [204.244.210.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA27498 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 10:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tom@localhost) by shell.uniserve.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA23785; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 10:48:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shell.uniserve.com: tom owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 10:48:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom To: Mike Nowlin cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: limit socket connections on 2.1.7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Mike Nowlin wrote: > Looking for a bit of information............ > > I'd like to limit the number of incoming TCP connections to a range of > port numbers (8000-8999). ("Limit port 8000 to 4 connections, 8001 to 10 > connections, and 8002 to 13 connections" type of thing...) > > With any luck, this capability is built into the 2.1.7 kernel, and I just > have to wave my magic wand and activate it. If not........ > > ......... How?? Kernel modifications? > > Any pointers would be greatly appreciated... This type of thing is normally done at the application level, not in the kernel. Whatever application you are using, should not open more connections than you want. > --Mike > mike@smlab.com > > > Tom From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 9 13:29:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA06222 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 13:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tarkin.smlab.com (tarkin.smlab.com [208.132.36.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA06214 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 13:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r2d2.smlab.com (mike@r2d2.smlab.com [192.168.2.7]) by tarkin.smlab.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA10401; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 16:34:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (mike@localhost) by r2d2.smlab.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id QAA00373; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 16:28:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 16:28:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike Nowlin To: Tom cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: limit socket connections on 2.1.7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Tom wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Mike Nowlin wrote: > > > I'd like to limit the number of incoming TCP connections to a range of > > port numbers (8000-8999). ("Limit port 8000 to 4 connections, 8001 to 10 > > connections, and 8002 to 13 connections" type of thing...) > > This type of thing is normally done at the application level, not in the > kernel. Whatever application you are using, should not open more > connections than you want. > Yea -- normally I'd do it that way... HOWEVER...... This is being used for a "for sale by connection" service, where the customers have access to their source code... I sell them a TCP port, they run their software on it....... I could require they put a certain block of code in their programs that restrict the number of connections, but that would be a bit difficult to monitor/enforce......... Mike From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 9 13:37:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA06781 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 13:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell.uniserve.com (tom@shell.uniserve.com [204.244.210.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA06771 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 13:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tom@localhost) by shell.uniserve.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA02216; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 13:33:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shell.uniserve.com: tom owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 13:33:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom To: Mike Nowlin cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: limit socket connections on 2.1.7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Mike Nowlin wrote: > > This is being used for a "for sale by connection" service, where the > customers have access to their source code... I sell them a TCP port, > they run their software on it....... I could require they put a certain > block of code in their programs that restrict the number of connections, > but that would be a bit difficult to monitor/enforce......... > > Mike But how are you stopping them from using additional ports? Why do you just bill by CPU time instead? Don't have to worry about connections or ports. Tom From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 10 17:55:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA07528 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 17:55:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.anasazi.com (mailhost.anasazi.com [138.113.128.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA07512 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 17:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chad.anasazi.com by mailhost.anasazi.com (5.65/3.7b) id AA16874; Thu, 10 Jul 97 17:54:09 -0700 Received: by chad.anasazi.com (5.65/3.7) id AA24640; Thu, 10 Jul 97 17:54:59 -0700 From: chad@anasazi.com (Chad R. Larson) Message-Id: <9707110054.AA24640@chad.anasazi.com> Subject: PCMCIA ethernet To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 17:54:58 -0700 (MST) Reply-To: chad@anasazi.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have a Toshiba Portege T3400CT/250 with a 3Com EtherLink III combo modem and Ethernet (3C562B/3C563B). It's currently running DOS/Windows but I'm planning to convert it to Win95. Since I'm gonna blow it all up and reload it, I thought it might be fun to load FreeBSD on it for a bit. Does anyone have experience with FreeBSD against this combo card? -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL22) Brother, can you paradigm? 602-870-3330 chad@anasazi.com chad@anasaz.UUCP chad@dcfinc.com Anasazi, Inc. - 7500 North Dreamy Draw Drive, Suite 120, Phoenix, Az 85020 From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 10 18:56:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA09745 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 18:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postman.opengroup.org (postman.opengroup.org [130.105.1.152]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA09708 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 18:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from loverso.southborough.ma.us (simplon.osf.org [130.105.7.200]) by postman.opengroup.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id VAA11506; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 21:54:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost.loverso.southborough.ma.us (localhost.loverso.southborough.ma.us [127.0.0.1]) by loverso.southborough.ma.us (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA25732; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 21:54:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199707110154.VAA25732@loverso.southborough.ma.us> X-Authentication-Warning: loverso.southborough.ma.us: Host localhost.loverso.southborough.ma.us [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: chad@anasazi.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCMCIA ethernet In-reply-to: Message from chad@anasazi.com (Chad R. Larson) <9707110054.AA24640@chad.anasazi.com> . X-Face: "UZ!}1W2N?eJdN(`1%|/OOPqJ).Idk?UyvWw'W-%`Gto8^IkEm>.g1O$[.;~}8E=Ire0|lO .o>:NlJS1@vO9bVmswRoq3j DdX9YGSeJ5a(mfX[1u>Z63G5_^+'8LVqjqvn X-Url: http://www.osf.org/~loverso/ Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 21:54:48 -0400 From: John Robert LoVerso Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Does anyone have experience with FreeBSD against this combo card? The 3c562 is still unsupported. Neither the Enet nor modem portion works. John From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 10 21:23:14 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA14708 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 21:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA14703 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 21:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA07664; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 22:23:04 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 22:23:04 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199707110423.WAA07664@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: chad@anasazi.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCMCIA ethernet In-Reply-To: <9707110054.AA24640@chad.anasazi.com> References: <9707110054.AA24640@chad.anasazi.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [ 3Com 3C562 combo card ] > Does anyone have experience with FreeBSD against this combo card? Combo cards aren't supported in FreeBSD right now. Nate From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 10 22:38:21 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA17774 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 22:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.itw.net (mail.itw.net [206.138.122.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA17767 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 22:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from babumpabajard (babump.itw.com [206.138.122.76]) by mail.itw.net (8.8.0/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA20514 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 01:38:11 -0400 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970711013734.00940a20@mail.itw.com> X-Sender: babump@mail.itw.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 01:37:46 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Babumpabajard Subject: Source upgrading Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I installed a 2.2.2-RELEASE distribution on my system the other day, and would like to upgrade to stable. I FTPed most of the FreeBSD-stable source directory, but noticed there is no /src/contrib directory. Where are the sources for them? Should stick with the release sources, or grab the current sources? Michael From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 11 00:53:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA24082 for stable-outgoing; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 00:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA24073 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 00:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) id RAA23201; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 17:22:45 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199707110752.RAA23201@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: PCMCIA ethernet In-Reply-To: <9707110054.AA24640@chad.anasazi.com> from "Chad R. Larson" at "Jul 10, 97 05:54:58 pm" To: chad@anasazi.com Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 17:22:45 +0930 (CST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Chad R. Larson stands accused of saying: > I have a Toshiba Portege T3400CT/250 with a 3Com EtherLink III combo > modem and Ethernet (3C562B/3C563B). It's currently running DOS/Windows > but I'm planning to convert it to Win95. > > Since I'm gonna blow it all up and reload it, I thought it might be fun > to load FreeBSD on it for a bit. > > Does anyone have experience with FreeBSD against this combo card? No combo support. (Yet) -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[ From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 11 08:26:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA15199 for stable-outgoing; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 08:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.neosoft.com (as5200-port-254.no.neosoft.com [206.27.167.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA15191 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 08:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by localhost.neosoft.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) id KAA02322; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 10:25:28 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.1 [p0] on FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970711013734.00940a20@mail.itw.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 10:22:51 -0500 (CDT) Organization: NeoSoft, Inc. From: Conrad Sabatier To: Babumpabajard Subject: RE: Source upgrading Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On 11-Jul-97 Babumpabajard wrote: >I installed a 2.2.2-RELEASE distribution on my system the other day, and >would like to upgrade to stable. > >I FTPed most of the FreeBSD-stable source directory, but noticed there is >no /src/contrib directory. Where are the sources for them? Should stick >with the release sources, or grab the current sources? Your best bet is to cvsup RELENG_2_2. This will automatically add/delete any differences between your existing sources and the latest ones in the 2.2 branch. See the handbook for more details. -- Conrad Sabatier http://www.neosoft.com/~conrads/ From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 11 09:18:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA17919 for stable-outgoing; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 09:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Symbion.srrc.usda.gov ([199.78.118.118]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA17911 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 09:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Symbion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Symbion.srrc.usda.gov (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA14305 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 11:15:14 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199707111615.LAA14305@Symbion.srrc.usda.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0delta 6/3/97 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Glenn Johnson Subject: rc.i386 file Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 11:15:14 -0500 Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I just upgraded a system from 2.2.1 to 2.2 stable via cvsup. I used the RELENG_2_2 tag. I noticed that the variable names in rc.conf are different from those in rc.i386 in some cases. For example, in rc.conf, there is 'moused_type', but in rc.i386, there is 'mousedtype'. Perhaps an updated rc.i386 file could be included in /usr/src/etc with the correct variable names to help those upgrading. -- Glenn Johnson USDA-ARS-SRRC gjohnson@nola.srrc.usda.gov From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 11 10:31:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA23078 for stable-outgoing; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 10:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vinyl.quickweb.com (vinyl.quickweb.com [206.222.77.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA23069 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 10:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mark@localhost) by vinyl.quickweb.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) id NAA10295; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 13:25:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19970711132530.19682@vinyl.quickweb.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 13:25:30 -0400 From: Mark Mayo To: Glenn Johnson Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc.i386 file References: <199707111615.LAA14305@Symbion.srrc.usda.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.69e In-Reply-To: <199707111615.LAA14305@Symbion.srrc.usda.gov>; from Glenn Johnson on Fri, Jul 11, 1997 at 11:15:14AM -0500 Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, Jul 11, 1997 at 11:15:14AM -0500, Glenn Johnson wrote: > I just upgraded a system from 2.2.1 to 2.2 stable via cvsup. I used the > RELENG_2_2 tag. I noticed that the variable names in rc.conf are different > from those in rc.i386 in some cases. For example, in rc.conf, there is > 'moused_type', but in rc.i386, there is 'mousedtype'. Perhaps an updated > rc.i386 file could be included in /usr/src/etc with the correct variable names > to help those upgrading. There is one... look in /usr/src/etc/etc.i386 (not entirely obvious, and you still have to put the rc.i386 in /etc) -Mark > -- > Glenn Johnson > USDA-ARS-SRRC > gjohnson@nola.srrc.usda.gov > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Mayo mark@quickweb.com RingZero Comp. http://vinyl.quickweb.com/mark finger mark@quickweb.com for my PGP key and GCS code ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- University degrees are a bit like adultery: you may not want to get involved with that sort of thing, but you don't want to be thought incapable. -Sir Peter Imbert From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 11 11:06:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA25373 for stable-outgoing; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 11:06:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA25367 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 11:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA01663; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 11:04:42 -0700 (PDT) To: Glenn Johnson cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc.i386 file In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 11 Jul 1997 11:15:14 CDT." <199707111615.LAA14305@Symbion.srrc.usda.gov> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 11:04:42 -0700 Message-ID: <1659.868644282@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I just upgraded a system from 2.2.1 to 2.2 stable via cvsup. I used the > RELENG_2_2 tag. I noticed that the variable names in rc.conf are different > from those in rc.i386 in some cases. For example, in rc.conf, there is > 'moused_type', but in rc.i386, there is 'mousedtype'. Perhaps an updated > rc.i386 file could be included in /usr/src/etc with the correct variable name s > to help those upgrading. There is. Are you sure you're grabbing RELENG_2_2? From a server with an up-to-date CVS tree? This one has actually been fixed for some time: revision 1.18.2.4 date: 1997/05/19 08:02:38; author: jkh; state: Exp; lines: +3 -3 YAMFC [I know the log message isn't very descriptive, but you can see the diff plainly between 1.18.2.3 and 1.18.2.4 :)] Jordan From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 12 18:51:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA29388 for stable-outgoing; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 18:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA29381 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 18:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.62 #1) id 0wnDkL-0000nI-00; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 18:46:45 -0700 Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 18:46:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: old "make reinstall" bug Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk "make reinstall" fails in 2.2-stable when trying to install klm_prot.h, because it does not exist. klm_prot.h is generated from klm_prot.x, and put into /usr/obj/include/rpcsvc, but the Makefile is looking for it in /usr/src/include/rpcsvc, so the install fails. A work-around is to copy klm_prot.h from the object tree to the source tree, but the Makefile(s) should be fixed. The same goes for /usr/src/include/rpcsvc/*.x. Can someone finally fix this? Tom From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 12 19:46:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA01693 for stable-outgoing; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 19:46:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA01684 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 19:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) id MAA01002; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 12:16:04 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199707130246.MAA01002@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: old "make reinstall" bug In-Reply-To: from Tom Samplonius at "Jul 12, 97 06:46:44 pm" To: tom@sdf.com (Tom Samplonius) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 12:16:04 +0930 (CST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Tom Samplonius stands accused of saying: > > "make reinstall" fails in 2.2-stable when trying to install klm_prot.h, > because it does not exist. > > klm_prot.h is generated from klm_prot.x, and put into > /usr/obj/include/rpcsvc, but the Makefile is looking for it in > /usr/src/include/rpcsvc, so the install fails. > > A work-around is to copy klm_prot.h from the object tree to the source > tree, but the Makefile(s) should be fixed. > > The same goes for /usr/src/include/rpcsvc/*.x. Can someone finally fix > this? The last time this issue came up, the solution was to update 'make' before doing 'make reinstall'. Try # cd /usr/src/usr.bin/make; make install # cd /usr/src; make reinstall The 'reinstall' target doesn't include the buildtools target, so when the build tools are updated, reinstall can sometime hiccup; though normally it's only 'make' and 'install' that suffer. > Tom -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[ From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 12 19:55:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA02083 for stable-outgoing; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 19:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA02077 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 1997 19:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.5/8.6.9) id MAA09052; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 12:51:50 +1000 Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 12:51:50 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199707130251.MAA09052@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, tom@sdf.com Subject: Re: old "make reinstall" bug Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > "make reinstall" fails in 2.2-stable when trying to install klm_prot.h, >because it does not exist. > > klm_prot.h is generated from klm_prot.x, and put into >/usr/obj/include/rpcsvc, but the Makefile is looking for it in >/usr/src/include/rpcsvc, so the install fails. The Makefile should look for it first in the current (obj) directory, which should be /usr/obj/usr/src/include/rpcsvc, not /usr/obj/usr/include/rpcsvc. This works in -current, and 2.2 doesn't seem to be significantly different for "make reinstall". Bruce