From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jan 17 06:28:47 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA20807 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 17 Jan 1999 06:28:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from wind.freenet.am ([194.151.101.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA20716 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 1999 06:27:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from casper@acc.am) Received: from lemming.acc.am (acc.freenet.am [194.151.101.251]) by wind.freenet.am (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA13549; Sun, 17 Jan 1999 18:25:34 +0400 (GMT) Received: from acc.am (nightmar.acc.am [192.168.100.108]) by lemming.acc.am (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA28294; Sun, 17 Jan 1999 18:41:06 +0400 (AMT) Message-ID: <36A106EB.66004DD4@acc.am> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 01:38:51 +0400 From: Casper Organization: Armenian Computer Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sworkman@nidlink.com CC: GVB , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Radius Solution References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org look at www.merit.edu/aaa - their commectial version have a lot of features like smart accounting, user time limits & etc. Shawn Workman wrote: > > There is a version of Radius called Radius NT that I think is being ported to > FreeBSD/Linux it has some pretty neat features like concurrency checks etc... > > I will see if I can find some more info for you.. > > On 14-Jan-99 GVB wrote: > > Hi there... My boss has tasked me with getting rid of NT as our dialin > > radius server. I told him that I could do a number of free > > implementations, but he wants a commercial radius software that will run on > > freebsd... he wants pay because if I am not here to fix it, he needs a > > tech support number as well as things like web logs or adduser scripts, > > etc... just wanted to get some recommendations, or lists of the available > > commercial radius software for freebsd... I havnt been able to really find > > any yet.. > > > > Thanks.. > > > > > > GVB > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > > ---------------------------------- > E-Mail: Shawn Workman > Date: 14-Jan-99 > Time: 18:50:06 > > This message was sent by XFMail > ---------------------------------- > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jan 17 21:26:29 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA18269 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 17 Jan 1999 21:26:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from casa.staub.net (casagate.staub.net [206.129.249.118]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA18263 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 1999 21:26:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phils@casagate.staub.net) Received: from casagate.staub.net (localhost.staub.net [127.0.0.1]) by casa.staub.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA00286 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 1999 21:26:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phils@casagate.staub.net) Message-ID: <36A2C5FB.65A95670@casagate.staub.net> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 21:26:19 -0800 From: Phil Staub X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: NFS/SSH interactions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The environment: A two-machine network at home has 2.2.7-STABLE from about mid October on my internet gateway machine and 2.2.8-RELEASE on the other. I'm trying to install SSH on the 2.2.8 machine, but when I do so, attempts to mount remote filesystems via NFS hang forever. I saw something like this once before, when I was trying to run one machine on DES and the other on MD5. >From these observations, my perception is that NFS expects the same authentication mechanism on both machines. Two questions: 1. Is this indeed true? (My knowledge of the internals of NFS being infinitesimally small) 2. Is there any way to use SSH on one machine and not on the other? Thanks. Phil -- Phil Staub, KE7HC Senior Software Engineer phils@casagate.staub.net Audio Precision, Inc. or phils@audioprecision.com Beaverton, OR 97075, (800) 231-7350 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jan 18 07:50:08 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA26256 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 07:50:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cominter.comliet.lt ([193.219.244.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA26167 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 07:49:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from art@el.vtu.lt) Received: from el.vtu.lt (atc.alna.lt [194.176.51.97]) by cominter.comliet.lt (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA27302 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 16:55:02 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from art@el.vtu.lt) Message-ID: <36A3582A.314CF95C@el.vtu.lt> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 16:50:02 +0100 From: Arturas Sileikis X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ethereal from ports collection Content-Type: text/plain; charset=x-user-defined Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I make install ethereal-0.5.1 from ports/net, running it as root: "ethereal -i ep0 &" and get following message: "The capture session could not be initiated. Please check to make sure you have sufficient permissions, and that you have the proper interface specified." Can anybody help.   To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jan 18 13:31:14 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA14725 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:31:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from caldera.telops.gte.com ([143.91.91.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA14712 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:31:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ehm@concentric.net) Received: from concentric.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by caldera.telops.gte.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA29536; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 15:30:12 -0600 Message-ID: <36A3A7E4.8CE869A@concentric.net> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 15:30:12 -0600 From: Erik Moe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04C-Caldera [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.33 i686) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: FreeBSD and RFC 1644 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Many moons ago I (maybe incorrectly) sent a bug report to freebsd.org. I can't remember the case number, but the text of the bug report went like this: My home home office has three systems: an Indy running IRIX 6.2, an i586 running FreeBSD 2.2.5, and an i386 also running FreeBSD 2.2.5. All three systems are connected via ethernet. The i386 serves as a gateway to the internet using a 28.8k modem and the user PPP package configured for demand dialing. Both the Indy and the i586 can route TCP/IP traffic through the gateway onto the Internet. I have Netscape Communicator version 4.04 for the Indy and Netscape Communicator 4.05 for the i586. Everything works find on both systems until I try to reach the URL "http://www.freebsd.org". The Indy system has no problems connecting to the FreeBSD web site. However, when I try to reach the same site with the i586 running FreeBSD 2.2.5, I get the following error from Netscape: A network error has occurred while Netscape was receiving data. (Network Error: Connection reset by peer) Try connecting again. This is really strange because the Indy system less than a foot away, using the same gateway has no problem connecting to the FreeBSD web site. The i586 has no problem reaching "http://www.yahoo.com", "http://java.sun.com". It just will not connect to "http://www.freebsd.org". Well, many things have happened since I sent that bug report, I changed jobs and no longer work out of my house or even have that Indy, but I did figure out a workaround to my problem. One of things I discovered was there were other sites that my i586 would not connect to other than "www.freebsd.org", one of them was "www.apache.org". The other thing I learned was that the problem had nothing to do with the i386 that I was using as a gateway. A standalone system my friend was using that also ran FreeBSD, user ppp, and netscape and was using the same isp (concentric.net) had the same problem. Finally, through sheer luck, I discover that if I disabled the rfc 1644 extensions through sysctl utility I was immediately able to connect to both "www.freebsd.org" and "www.apache.org". My main interest in this problem at this point is simply curiosity. I have glanced through rfc 1644 looking for answers, but if they are there, they simply don't smack me in the face. I can accept the fact that my service provider may have their network configured in such a way that it breaks the combination of FreeBSD and rfc 1644, but can someone out there tell me why this combination might break? Erik Moe ehm@concentric.net P.S. I know this issue continues to exist for me in 2.2.6-RELEASE, and I assume that it continues in 2.2.7 and 2.2.8. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jan 18 15:28:50 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA00670 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 15:28:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [208.221.12.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA00664 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 15:28:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA29997; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 15:26:00 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199901182326.PAA29997@implode.root.com> To: Erik Moe cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD and RFC 1644 In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 18 Jan 1999 15:30:12 CST." <36A3A7E4.8CE869A@concentric.net> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 15:25:59 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >My main interest in this problem at this point is simply curiosity. I >have glanced through rfc 1644 looking for answers, but if they are >there, they simply don't smack me in the face. I can accept the fact >that my service provider may have their network configured in such a way >that it breaks the combination of FreeBSD and rfc 1644, but can someone >out there tell me why this combination might break? Some terminal servers are known to not grok TCP options correctly - those from Annex come to mind, but I recall that there were others. Anyway, if all the packets with TCP options get dropped or mangled, then it should be pretty obvious why it doesn't work. :-) -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jan 18 22:21:52 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA22733 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 22:21:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA22725 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 22:21:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spork@super-g.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA17774; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 01:21:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 01:21:01 -0500 (EST) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: David Greenman cc: Erik Moe , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD and RFC 1644 In-Reply-To: <199901182326.PAA29997@implode.root.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org FWIW, concentric is in a colo with us here, and guess what the dial equipment is? Bay 5399's. This is loosely based on that cranky old Annex code (Bay bought Xylogics, fine purveyors of crappy stacks some years ago) that used to make my life hell. Anyhow, you'd think they'd fixed it by now wouldn't you. As far as I can tell concentric is an all Bay shop. Look out ;) Charles --- Charles Sprickman spork@super-g.com --- "...there's no idea that's so good you can't ruin it with a few well-placed idiots." On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, David Greenman wrote: > >My main interest in this problem at this point is simply curiosity. I > >have glanced through rfc 1644 looking for answers, but if they are > >there, they simply don't smack me in the face. I can accept the fact > >that my service provider may have their network configured in such a way > >that it breaks the combination of FreeBSD and rfc 1644, but can someone > >out there tell me why this combination might break? > > Some terminal servers are known to not grok TCP options correctly - those > from Annex come to mind, but I recall that there were others. Anyway, if all > the packets with TCP options get dropped or mangled, then it should be pretty > obvious why it doesn't work. :-) > > -DG > > David Greenman > Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 20 04:22:08 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA22460 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 04:22:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from octopus.originative.co.uk (originat.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA22455 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 04:22:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from paul@originative.co.uk) From: paul@originative.co.uk Received: by OCTOPUS with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:20:31 -0000 Message-ID: To: asmodai@wxs.nl, opsys@open-systems.net Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: QUESTION: FBSD + SQUID or FBSD + APACHE? Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:20:31 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai [mailto:asmodai@wxs.nl] > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 1999 7:53 PM > To: Open Systems Inc. > Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: RE: QUESTION: FBSD + SQUID or FBSD + APACHE? > > > On 13-Jan-99 Open Systems Inc. wrote: > > > We are moving to a new building in ~45 days. They > have a NT web > > server farm of around 15 boxes. All the boxes sit on a > switched ethernet > > network. The question I have is what would be faster and be > the biggest > > performance boost: Squid doing caching + accelerating the > NT web servers > > on FBSD of course, or Apache + Proxy/Caching module? > > > Basically what im trying to do is pull the web > content from the NT > > boxes over to a FBSD box and make the FBSD boxes do the > actuall serving > > because they will obviously perform alot better. > > Go with Apache and a caching module, as Squid is purely based > on caching > HTTP data and not really serving this data, whereas Apache is > a pure HTTPd. It depends rather a lot on what the NT servers are actually serving. A lot of IIS content can be very IIS specific and Apache won't be able to serve it without rewriting your web applications. Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 20 04:41:33 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA24735 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 04:41:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.elpn.com (ns1.elpn.com [209.194.74.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA24722 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 04:41:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rosteen@elpn.com) Received: from elpn.com (cox.com [206.98.143.200]) by ns1.elpn.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA13618 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 03:33:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from rosteen@elpn.com) Message-ID: <36A5CEB5.EDACBA23@elpn.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 07:40:21 -0500 From: username Reply-To: rosteen@elpn.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: @Home using FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Has anyone setup a FreeBSD system on @Home's cable modem service? If so, what are the caveats? Thanks for any help, Rick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 20 05:17:41 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA28344 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 05:17:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lion.butya.kz (butya-gw.butya.kz [194.87.112.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA28334 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 05:17:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bp@butya.kz) Received: from bp (helo=localhost) by lion.butya.kz with local-smtp (Exim 2.054 #1) id 102xVW-00003L-00 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 19:17:18 +0600 Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 19:17:18 +0600 (ALMT) From: Boris Popov To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Two bugs and suggestion for IPX stack Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1094206439-916838238=:29453" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --0-1094206439-916838238=:29453 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Hello, for about a two months ago I make few changes in IPX stack related to broadcast bug, internal net support and little bug in SPX implementation. As they work stable I suggest them to discuss and commit in to source tree. Here is a short explanation: Broadcasts: local host never get broadcast packet originated by itself. Novell implementation do that, and this simplify programming. Internal net: it is possible to implement internal net conception like used in Netware servers by configure loopback interface as follows: ifconfig lo0 ipx 0x5a5a.1 After that, server programs like mars_nwe , can use only network 0x5a5a and host 1. Of course this requires small changes to ipx stack and IPXrouted. SPX bug are just invalid order of operators :) All patches are simple and attached at the end of letter. BTW, I mostly finish work on Netware client (typical throughput about 730Kb/s on 10Mbit network). Higher rates is possible with packet burst mode, so does any body know the details ? -- Boris Popov --0-1094206439-916838238=:29453 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=diff1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=diff1 ZGlmZiAtcnViIC4vc2FwX3RhYmxlcy5jIG5ldy9zYXBfdGFibGVzLmMNCi0t LSAuL3NhcF90YWJsZXMuYwlNb24gRmViIDE2IDE5OjU0OjMyIDE5OTgNCisr KyBuZXcvc2FwX3RhYmxlcy5jCVNhdCBEZWMgIDUgMjE6MDU6MjYgMTk5OA0K QEAgLTEzNCw2ICsxMzQsNyBAQA0KIAkJZm9yKHNhcCA9IHNoLT5mb3J3OyBz YXAgIT0gKHNhcF9lbnRyeSAqKXNoOyBzYXAgPSBzYXAtPmZvcncpIHsNCiAJ CQlpZiAoU2VydlR5cGUgIT0gc2FwLT5zYXAuU2VydlR5cGUpDQogCQkJCWNv bnRpbnVlOw0KKyNpZiAwDQogCQkJaWYgKGlmcCA9PSBzYXAtPmlmcCkNCiAJ CQkJY29udGludWU7DQogDQpAQCAtMTQ3LDYgKzE0OCw3IEBADQogCQkJCQln b3RvIG5leHQ7DQogCQkJCWNzYXAgPSBjc2FwLT5jbG9uZTsNCiAJCQl9DQor I2VuZGlmDQogDQogCQkJaWYgKG50b2hzKHNhcC0+c2FwLmhvcHMpIDwgYmVz dGhvcHMpIHsNCiAJCQkJYmVzdCA9IHNhcDsNCmRpZmYgLXJ1YiAuL3N0YXJ0 dXAuYyBuZXcvc3RhcnR1cC5jDQotLS0gLi9zdGFydHVwLmMJU2F0IEZlYiAy MiAyMjowMTowMSAxOTk3DQorKysgbmV3L3N0YXJ0dXAuYwlXZWQgSmFuIDIw IDE4OjQ0OjMxIDE5OTkNCkBAIC0xODMsNiArMTgzLDkgQEANCiAJCQl9DQog CQkJaWZzLmludF9kc3RhZGRyID0gKmJyZGFkZHI7DQogCQl9DQorCQlpZiAo aWZzLmludF9mbGFncyAmIElGRl9MT09QQkFDSykgew0KKwkJCWlmcy5pbnRf ZHN0YWRkciA9IGlmcy5pbnRfYWRkcjsNCisJCX0NCiAJCS8qIA0KIAkJICog YWxyZWFkeSBrbm93biB0byB1cz8gDQogCQkgKiB3aGF0IG1ha2VzIGEgUE9J TlRPUE9JTlQgaWYgdW5pcXVlIGlzIGl0cyBkc3QgYWRkciwNCkBAIC0xOTIs OSArMTk1LDYgQEANCiAJCQlpZl9pZndpdGhkc3RhZGRyKCZpZnMuaW50X2Rz dGFkZHIpKSB8fA0KIAkJCSggKChpZnMuaW50X2ZsYWdzICYgSUZGX1BPSU5U T1BPSU5UKSA9PSAwKSAmJg0KIAkJCWlmX2lmd2l0aGFkZHIoJmlmcy5pbnRf YWRkcikpKQ0KLQkJCWNvbnRpbnVlOw0KLQkJLyogbm8gb25lIGNhcmVzIGFi b3V0IHNvZnR3YXJlIGxvb3BiYWNrIGludGVyZmFjZXMgKi8NCi0JCWlmIChp ZnMuaW50X2ZsYWdzICYgSUZGX0xPT1BCQUNLKQ0KIAkJCWNvbnRpbnVlOw0K IAkJaWZwID0gKHN0cnVjdCBpbnRlcmZhY2UgKikNCiAJCQltYWxsb2Moc2Rs LT5zZGxfbmxlbiArIDEgKyBzaXplb2YoaWZzKSk7DQo= --0-1094206439-916838238=:29453 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=diff2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=diff2 ZGlmZiAtcnViIC4vaXB4X291dHB1dGZsLmMgbmV3L2lweF9vdXRwdXRmbC5j DQotLS0gLi9pcHhfb3V0cHV0ZmwuYwlNb24gRmViIDE2IDE5OjM0OjMwIDE5 OTgNCisrKyBuZXcvaXB4X291dHB1dGZsLmMJV2VkIEphbiAyMCAxNTozODo1 NyAxOTk5DQpAQCAtMTE4LDcgKzExOCw3IEBADQogCSAqIHN1Y2ggYSBwYWNr ZXQuDQogCSAqLw0KIAlpZiAoZHN0LT5zaXB4X2FkZHIueF9ob3N0LmNfaG9z dFswXSYxKSB7DQotCQlpZiAoKGlmcC0+aWZfZmxhZ3MgJiBJRkZfQlJPQURD QVNUKSA9PSAwKSB7DQorCQlpZiAoKGlmcC0+aWZfZmxhZ3MgJiAoSUZGX0JS T0FEQ0FTVCB8IElGRl9MT09QQkFDSykpID09IDApIHsNCiAJCQllcnJvciA9 IEVBRERSTk9UQVZBSUw7DQogCQkJZ290byBiYWQ7DQogCQl9DQpAQCAtMTI2 LDYgKzEyNiw3IEBADQogCQkJZXJyb3IgPSBFQUNDRVM7DQogCQkJZ290byBi YWQ7DQogCQl9DQorCQltMC0+bV9mbGFncyB8PSBNX0JDQVNUOw0KIAl9DQog DQogCWlmIChodG9ucyhpcHgtPmlweF9sZW4pIDw9IGlmcC0+aWZfbXR1KSB7 DQpkaWZmIC1ydWIgLi9zcHhfdXNycmVxLmMgbmV3L3NweF91c3JyZXEuYw0K LS0tIC4vc3B4X3VzcnJlcS5jCVdlZCBKYW4gMTMgMTQ6NDE6MDAgMTk5OQ0K KysrIG5ldy9zcHhfdXNycmVxLmMJV2VkIEphbiAyMCAxODo1MTowNSAxOTk5 DQpAQCAtMTMzNSwxMyArMTMzNSwxMyBAQA0KIAlpcHhwID0gc290b2lweHBj Yihzbyk7DQogDQogCU1BTExPQyhjYiwgc3RydWN0IHNweHBjYiAqLCBzaXpl b2YgKmNiLCBNX1BDQiwgTV9OT1dBSVQpOw0KLQliemVybyhjYiwgc2l6ZW9m ICpjYik7DQotCXNiID0gJnNvLT5zb19zbmQ7DQogDQogCWlmIChjYiA9PSBO VUxMKSB7DQogCQllcnJvciA9IEVOT0JVRlM7DQogCQlnb3RvIHNweF9hdHRh Y2hfZW5kOw0KIAl9DQorCWJ6ZXJvKGNiLCBzaXplb2YgKmNiKTsNCisJc2Ig PSAmc28tPnNvX3NuZDsNCiANCiAJbW0gPSBtX2dldGNscihNX0RPTlRXQUlU LCBNVF9IRUFERVIpOw0KIAlpZiAobW0gPT0gTlVMTCkgew0K --0-1094206439-916838238=:29453-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 20 10:47:31 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA02333 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:47:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pedigree.cs.ubc.ca (pedigree.cs.ubc.ca [142.103.6.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA02327 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:47:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjmccut@cs.ubc.ca) Received: (from ean@localhost) by pedigree.cs.ubc.ca (8.8.8/8.6.9) id KAA27638 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:47:15 -0800 (PST) X400-Received: by /PRMD=ca/ADMD=telecom.canada/C=ca/; Relayed; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:47:14 UTC-0800 Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:47:14 UTC-0800 X400-Originator: mjmccut@cs.ubc.ca X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:; X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2) X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=ca/ADMD=telecom.canada/C=ca/;990120104714] Content-Identifier: 14764 From: Mark McCutcheon To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <"14764*mjmccut@cs.ubc.ca"@MHS> Subject: Re: @Home using FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 (Generated by Ean X.400 to MIME gateway) Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org says: > Has anyone setup a FreeBSD system on @Home's cable modem service? > If so, what are the caveats? I think the first caveat is that a lot of the operational details are determined by the local cable provider, rather than by @Home, so may vary considerably with geographic location. I've had a Rogers@Home connection in Vancouver, BC, for about a month. Getting it running initially under WinNT, one of their "supported" operating systems, was somewhat painful (the less said about that, the better!). However, switching to FreeBSD (v2.2.5) was straightforward, the only problem was getting the ISAbus 10BaseT card Rogers supplied (SMC8416T EtherEZ) working on an unused interrupt - this required switching the printer port to polled mode to free up IRQ7 for the NIC, as it has a limited range of acceptable interrupts, all of which were already dedicated. You also need to use the DOS setup software to put the NIC in memory-mapped mode, as the I/O mapped default mode isn't supported by the ed0 driver. Rogers@Home uses DHCP for host address, gateway, nameservers, etc. BUT at present they are administering these effectively statically. I was able to set the system up using static parameters, which made it easier to get IPFW/NATD running. Initially this was for network support over a single IP address, but the desirability of using the system as a screening router soon became apparent (more later). It looks easy enough to use the WIDE-DHCP client along with the dynamic capabilities of NATD to enable such a system to work in a DHCP environment. The second big caveat is: use a firewall or screening router! My previous Internet connection was through a terminal server to my employer's network, a relatively protected environment. Within minutes of bringing up the system with ipfw enabled, it began logging telnet attempts, accesses to the IRC/NetBus ports, etc. Security arrangements are a subject for another note, but be advised that you're going to need them with a "24x7" connection to the Internet. The only other anomaly I've noticed is that Rogers' flashy (Java?) browsing tool invariably crashes Netscape 4.5 as ported to FreeBSD. The data rates seem excellent, though I've read reports of slow service in other @Home areas. TCP streaming tests using netperf, between my home machine and a workstation at work run at 250-500kbps uplink and 750-2000kbps downlink (the higher numbers usually late in the evening). Using ADSL competitor Sympatico's network speed test (local to BC: http://www.bc.sympatico.ca/bc_local/speedtest/ tends to give higher numbers, downloads running 2.5-3Mbps. X-windows (run through ssh tunnels) with client programs at a remote site is fast and responsive, just like being there. So in summary, no real problems except security. If you don't already do so, you might want to read comp.dcom.modems.cable for general commentary on the @Home service in different parts of North America. Mark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 20 12:38:19 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA15127 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:38:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA15122 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:38:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA012583616; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:46:56 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:46:56 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: username Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: @Home using FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <36A5CEB5.EDACBA23@elpn.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, username wrote: > Has anyone setup a FreeBSD system on @Home's cable modem service? Yes, quite a few times. > If so, > what are the caveats? None, everything should run smooth. If you plan to run natd and pipe your network through your machine make sure you don't mention that to the guy who does the installation, though. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 20 15:14:04 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA00738 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:14:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.bvinet.com ([208.239.76.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA00702 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:13:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msierra@bvinet.com) Received: by mail with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:12:59 -0500 Message-ID: <211D0157FD1FD21190DB00104B8765E906D13A@mail> From: Miguel Sierra To: "'Bill Fumerola'" , username Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Cable Modem and FreeBSD Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:12:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="---- =_NextPart_001_01BE44CA.6BA3A300" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------ =_NextPart_001_01BE44CA.6BA3A300 Content-Type: text/plain n Wed, 20 Jan 1999, username wrote: > Has anyone setup a FreeBSD system on @Home's cable modem service? Yes, quite a few times. > If so, > what are the caveats? None, everything should run smooth. If you plan to run natd and pipe your network through your machine make sure you don't mention that to the guy who does the installation, though. - I have also a cable modem. I don't know if you guys know the company (MediaOne). But the problems is that it only runs 1 static IP, and only that IP could actually get to see the login screen. I hope that everyone understand. If anyone tells me that it's possible to do this tell me so. When I got the system for my windows machine they told me that only Windows could be used. I know it doesn't make much sence, since it's going through TCP/IP. I'll be more than glad if anyone has one of these running like that. Thank you, MIguel. ------ =_NextPart_001_01BE44CA.6BA3A300 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cable Modem and FreeBSD

n Wed, 20 Jan 1999, username wrote:

> Has anyone setup a FreeBSD system on @Home's = cable modem service?

Yes, quite a few times.

>         =         =             =         =           If so,

> what are the caveats?

None, everything should run smooth. If you plan to = run natd and pipe your
network through your machine make sure you don't = mention that to the guy
who does the installation, though.



-



I have also a cable modem. I don't know if you guys = know the company (MediaOne). But the problems is that it only runs 1 = static IP, and only that IP could actually get to see the login screen. = I hope that everyone understand.

If anyone tells me that it's possible to do this tell = me so.

When I got the system for my windows machine they = told me that only Windows could be used. I know it doesn't make much = sence, since it's going through TCP/IP.


I'll be more than glad if anyone has one of these = running like that.


Thank you,

MIguel.

------ =_NextPart_001_01BE44CA.6BA3A300-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 20 15:28:46 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA02289 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:28:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA02284 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:28:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.1/frmug-2.3/nospam) with UUCP id AAA27256 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 00:28:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix, from userid 101) id 2A6771574; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 23:46:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 23:46:53 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: @Home using FreeBSD Message-ID: <19990120234653.A24271@keltia.freenix.fr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <"14764*mjmccut@cs.ubc.ca"@MHS> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: <"14764*mjmccut@cs.ubc.ca"@MHS>; from Mark McCutcheon on Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 10:47:14AM +0000 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT/ELF ctm#4994 AMD-K6 MMX @ 200 MHz Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to Mark McCutcheon: > minutes of bringing up the system with ipfw enabled, it began > logging telnet attempts, accesses to the IRC/NetBus ports, etc. Seconded. In another life, I do spam fighting/cancelling and we've recently seen a lot of various @Home customers being heavily abused by spammers, scanning for open NNTP/SMTP servers. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #69: Mon Jan 18 02:02:12 CET 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 20 15:58:02 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA05382 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:58:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from abused.com (abused.com [204.216.142.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA05377 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:58:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gvb@tns.net) Received: from gvb (gvb.tns.net [204.216.245.137]) by abused.com (8.9.1a/I feel abused.) with SMTP id PAA02574 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:58:50 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990120155059.00a64b00@abused.com> X-Sender: gvb@abused.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:58:19 -0800 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG From: GVB Subject: Firewall headaches... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Here is my situation. Cisco router connected to internet lets say 200.200.200.0 255.255.255.0. I have a FreeBSD 3.0 machine with two network cards, the first card is connected to the cisco with lets say an IP address of 200.200.200.2, the cisco being .1 and its gateway. The second network card has an IP address out of another subnet, 100.100.100.21 netmask 255.255.255.252 (for testing purposes). I setup a route in the cisco to route 100.100.100.20 255.255.255.252 to 200.200.200.2. So the subnet I am trying to place behind the firewall is routed to the first network card in the FreeBSD machine. I can ping to both of these network cards and get immediate normal responses from them. But the machine that is behind the firewall (connected to the second network card with an IP address of 100.100.100.22, netmask .252, gateway .21) gives me very eratic responses. I ping it, and it sits for 60 seconds, then I get about 40 replies all at one time. The machine can not see out on the web or anything, but I can telnet to port 139 of the machine (its windows). The firewall configuration is completely open and from what I understand this is what I needed to compile with to get the firewall working; pseudo-device bpfilter 4 #Berkeley packet filter options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPDIVERT options IPFILTER Here is my ipfw list 65300 allow ip from any to any 65535 deny ip from any to any Both NICs are configured in rc.conf, firewall is set to open in rc.conf. Do I need to setup some kind of static routes on the FreeBSD machine, or run routed or gated or some other routing software? Any help is greatly appriciated. GVB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 20 18:52:55 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA26020 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:52:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sydney.alpha.net.au (sydney.alpha.net.au [203.31.171.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA26011 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:52:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danny@sydney.alpha.net.au) Received: (from danny@localhost) by sydney.alpha.net.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA17773; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 13:49:57 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 13:49:57 +1100 (EST) From: Dan To: paul@originative.co.uk cc: asmodai@wxs.nl, opsys@open-systems.net, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: QUESTION: FBSD + SQUID or FBSD + APACHE? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I have worked with IIS for some time now and I have experienced many problems. Like the blue screen of death after u deployed ur webserver .. Plus many more ture stories how NT screwed up some mission critcal projects If I was you Paul I would completely forget about Nt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 21 03:58:19 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA25119 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 03:58:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from octopus.originative.co.uk (originat.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA25089 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 03:58:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from paul@originative.co.uk) From: paul@originative.co.uk Received: by OCTOPUS with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:56:28 -0000 Message-ID: To: danny@sydney.alpha.net.au, paul@originative.co.uk Cc: asmodai@wxs.nl, opsys@open-systems.net, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: QUESTION: FBSD + SQUID or FBSD + APACHE? Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:56:20 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan [mailto:danny@sydney.alpha.net.au] > Sent: Thursday, January 21, 1999 2:50 AM > To: paul@originative.co.uk > Cc: asmodai@wxs.nl; opsys@open-systems.net; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: RE: QUESTION: FBSD + SQUID or FBSD + APACHE? > > > Hi, I have worked with IIS for some time now and I have > experienced many > problems. Like the blue screen of death after u deployed ur > webserver .. > > Plus many more ture stories how NT screwed up some mission critcal > projects > > If I was you Paul I would completely forget about Nt Ehh? I've never, ever said anything in favour of NT! Please, don't besmirch my character in such a manner :-) You've removed all the context but if this is in reference to the proposal to move a site from NT to FreeBSD I just suggested that the content of the site be checked first before pushing his boss to adopt FreeBSD since if the content uses a lot of IIS features the Web applications themselves will need rewriting, it won't just be a simple matter of changing web server. I never meant to imply that moving to FreeBSD wouldn't be a good idea, it just might be more work than they realise. Beneficial in the long wrong though for sure but probably a lot harder to justify to management. Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 21 14:34:04 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA07081 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:34:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA07015; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:33:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA29260; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:26:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdX29256; Thu Jan 21 22:26:14 1999 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:26:08 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: phk@FreeBSD.ORG cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Netgraph new version Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org A prerelease version is available at: The release version is waiting for 'make world' to work again, so We can do our last tests on it. This is substantially production quality code, as we have spent a week cleaning and preening. ftp://ftp.whistle.com/pub/archie/misc/netgraph.tgz This file includes a USEFUL README file, a tar file of new files and a patch file to change existing files.. (including a patch to netstat to allow it to report netgraph 'socket' nodes.) Man pages for all the node types patches to if_sr.c and if_ar.c compile cleanly and give examples of how a sync card should be interfaced.. (if_ar.c is easier to understand) (these cannot be tested as we don't have those cards, but the netgraph code has been tested with our own proprietary card) All nodes except the sync cards can be loaded as KLD modules however to compile the sync cards in you also need the base netgraph module in the kernel. requires newest version of uipc_domain.c and domian.h If you want to test it without the sync cards, you can load the whole thing into a new kernel as modules and try it from there. You should read the man pages: netgraph(4) ng_socket netgraph(3) ngctl(8) nghook(8) ng_{other tyes} probably in that order The following modules are supplied: base - the base framework. UI - simple node t add/strip "Un-numbered Information" header (0x03) async - do rfc 1662 framing/unframing on a packet cisco - 'cisco' hdlc framing and protocol. echo - echoes packets back at sender hole - blackhole (discard device) iface - netgraph node on one side, regular interface on the other rfc1490 - rfc1490 frame-relay protocol encapsulation lmi - frame relay link management protocol handler. frame-relay - frame-relay channel multiplexor/demultiplexor socket - netgraph node on one side, socket on the other tee - assist debugging by tapping a link tty - netgraph node on one side, tty line disciplin on the other. plus: if_sr.c, if_ar.c patches to make these netgraph capable. ppp - unfinished ppp node vjc - unfinished van-jacobson compression node patches are also available for mpd to allow mpd to run multilink ppp into a netgraph socket. (not supplied) Netgraph is designed to allow quick development of production quality modules that can be re-used in such environments as ATM, fram-relay, ppp, async-ppp, ISDN. Each module knows how to do ONE thing. you hook them together to do more. julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 21 21:30:21 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA19219 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 21:30:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA19192; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 21:30:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id TAA28824; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:15:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from bubba.whistle.com( 207.76.205.7) by whistle.com via smap (V2.0) id xma028822; Thu, 21 Jan 99 19:15:07 -0800 Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id TAA06736; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:15:06 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199901220315.TAA06736@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: D-channel communications In-Reply-To: from Avalon Books at "Jan 21, 99 08:15:22 pm" To: avalon@advicom.net (Avalon Books) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:15:06 -0800 (PST) Cc: isdn@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Avalon Books writes: > > I think (at least in the US) your ISDN line has to be provisioned > > properly before it will transfer X.25 packets. > > True. But that's merely a phone call away (same with provisions for > Packet 6 and Packet 30 and a few other things). > > Mostly, I was just pointing out that the phone companies aren't > exactly thrilled with the prospect of AODI... Anybody know of any X.25 implementations out there? Seems like a good candidate for a netgraph node. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 21 23:25:06 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA02614 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 23:25:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hcsext.hcs.de (hcsext.hcs.de [194.123.40.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA02595; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 23:25:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hm@hcs.de) Received: from hcswork.hcs.de([192.76.124.5]) (1434 bytes) by hcsext.hcs.de via sendmail with P:smtp/R:inet_hosts/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:24:22 +0100 (CET) (Smail-3.2.0.104 1998-Nov-20 #1 built 1998-Dec-11) Received: by hcswork.hcs.de (Smail3.1.29.0 #12) id m103ax3-00001dC; Fri, 22 Jan 99 08:24 MET Message-Id: From: hm@hcs.de (Hellmuth Michaelis) Subject: Re: D-channel communications In-Reply-To: <199901220315.TAA06736@bubba.whistle.com> from Archie Cobbs at "Jan 21, 99 07:15:06 pm" To: archie@whistle.com (Archie Cobbs) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:24:21 +0100 (MET) Cc: avalon@advicom.net, isdn@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: hm@hcs.de Organization: HCS Hanseatischer Computerservice GmbH X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >From the keyboard of Archie Cobbs: > Anybody know of any X.25 implementations out there? There used to be one in the FreeBSD tree :-) Another can be found on the Motorola web-site, buried in the 68302 development toolbox. hellmuth -- Hellmuth Michaelis Tel +49 40 559747-70 HCS Hanseatischer Computerservice GmbH Fax +49 40 559747-77 Oldesloer Strasse 97-99 Mail hm [at] hcs.de 22457 Hamburg WWW http://www.hcs.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 04:09:43 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA03651 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 04:09:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mhs (mhs.swan.ac.uk [137.44.1.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA03646; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 04:09:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from G.S.J.Howell@swansea.ac.uk) Received: from www-compsci.swan.ac.uk by mhs with SMTP-LOCAL (XT-PP) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:06:01 +0000 Received: from Swansea.ac.uk (cscall [137.44.2.58]) by www-compsci.swan.ac.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA28545; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:18:19 GMT (envelope-from G.S.J.Howell@Swansea.ac.uk) Message-ID: <36A86A24.60DE0C68@Swansea.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:08:04 +0000 From: G X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) To: Miguel Sierra , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG CC: "'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: getting machine on internet References: <211D0157FD1FD21190DB00104B8765E906D12E@mail> <36985738.4B2DE9BF@softweyr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Wes Peters wrote: > I have two quick suggestions. > > First, tell "Internet Mail Service" (whatever THAT is) to STOP sending > HTML. Send ASCII text instead. It will be much more readable by > people on the FreeBSD mailing lists. You will also want to keep > your mail messages within 80 columns, for those who are using text- > based mailers. AFAIK, it is possible to tell majordomo to filter out HTML posts. I wish the admin would do this. Just my 0.02 ukp. G. -- Geraint Howell, Department of Computer Science, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP. UK. Tel:(+44)1792 295 651 Fax:(+44)1792 295 708 E-mail: g.s.j.howell[at]swansea.ac.uk "The geeks shall inherit the Earth" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 07:35:08 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA29496 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 07:35:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from excalibur.oceanis.net (ns.dotcom.fr [194.133.21.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA29443 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 07:34:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pixel@excalibur.oceanis.net) Received: (from pixel@localhost) by excalibur.oceanis.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id PAA01546 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:34:47 GMT From: Emmanuel DELOGET Message-Id: <199901221534.PAA01546@excalibur.oceanis.net> Subject: Snmp devlpmt To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:34:47 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm sorry to disturb you. I wanna know if a kernel-level SNMP support is planed or not. Since the sysctl stuff provide an interesting beginning, it may be possible to extend its possibilities. I'm currently working on this (a study phase, for the moment). But I have no time to do what allready exists... :) -- pixel@dotcom.fr ---------------------------------------------- DotCom Communication Numérique To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 08:23:32 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA04440 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:23:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from qnx.com (qnx.com [198.53.31.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA04435 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:23:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nobody@gateway.qnx.com) Received: from gateway.qnx.com (root@gateway.qnx.com [198.53.31.254]) by qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA23442 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:23:16 -0500 Received: (from news@localhost) by gateway.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA07024 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:10:23 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: gateway.qnx.com: news set sender to using -f From: pixel@DotCom.FR (Emmanuel DELOGET) Subject: Snmp devlpmt Date: 22 Jan 1999 11:10:21 -0500 Organization: QNX Software Systems Ltd. Message-ID: <199901221534.PAA01546@excalibur.oceanis.net> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm sorry to disturb you. I wanna know if a kernel-level SNMP support is planed or not. Since the sysctl stuff provide an interesting beginning, it may be possible to extend its possibilities. I'm currently working on this (a study phase, for the moment). But I have no time to do what allready exists... :) -- pixel@dotcom.fr ---------------------------------------------- DotCom Communication Numérique To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 09:16:20 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA09789 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:16:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from devil.prz.tu-berlin.de (devil.prz.tu-berlin.de [130.149.62.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA09783 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:16:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michey@prz.tu-berlin.de) Received: from localhost (michey@localhost) by devil.prz.tu-berlin.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA08265 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 18:16:01 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: devil.prz.tu-berlin.de: michey owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 18:16:00 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Eyrich X-Sender: michey@devil To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: if_lnc.c and multicast Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, I am looking for someone who is 'responsible' for the lnc network driver and/or who knows, how to enable the multicast support for it. It is already partially enabled by defining LNC_MULTICAST, but the reception of multicast packets still seems to be impossible. The problem: we run a PCI-Ethernet adapter and want to test the IPv6 Implementation currently available from KAME. lnc1: rev 0x25 int a irq 18 on pci0.17.0 lnc1: PCnet-FAST address 00:60:b0:??:??:?? Since IPv6 relies on Multicast (Address configuration) IPv6 is usable only if the interface is set into promiscuous mode (e.g. by tcpdump) I would be happy if someone could help! Michael -- Michael Eyrich, PRZ, TU-Berlin michey@prz.tu-berlin.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 09:54:37 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA14789 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:54:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from octopus.originative.co.uk (originat.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA14784 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:54:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from paul@originative.co.uk) From: paul@originative.co.uk Received: by OCTOPUS with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 17:52:55 -0000 Message-ID: To: michey@prz.tu-berlin.de, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: if_lnc.c and multicast Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 17:52:54 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Eyrich [mailto:michey@prz.tu-berlin.de] > Sent: Friday, January 22, 1999 5:16 PM > To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: if_lnc.c and multicast > > > > > Hello, > > I am looking for someone who is 'responsible' for the lnc network > driver and/or who knows, how to enable the multicast support for it. > > It is already partially enabled by defining LNC_MULTICAST, but the > reception of multicast packets still seems to be impossible. > > The problem: we run a PCI-Ethernet adapter and want to test the > IPv6 Implementation currently available from KAME. > > lnc1: rev 0x25 int a irq 18 on pci0.17.0 > lnc1: PCnet-FAST address 00:60:b0:??:??:?? > > Since IPv6 relies on Multicast (Address configuration) IPv6 > is usable only > if the interface is set into promiscuous mode (e.g. by tcpdump) That'd be me. I wrote the driver years ago and at the time never had a network to test the multicast code on which is why it never got enabled by default. I've got a network of my own these days so I should be able to test it properly. I'm working on the driver this weekend so I'll make sure I sort out multicast while I'm at it. Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 10:43:33 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA20466 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:43:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA20461 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:43:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA19302; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:42:28 -0200 (EDT) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199901221842.QAA19302@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Subject: X.25 -> AX.25 ? In-Reply-To: <199901220315.TAA06736@bubba.whistle.com> from Archie Cobbs at "Jan 21, 1999 7:15: 6 pm" To: archie@whistle.com (Archie Cobbs) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:42:28 -0200 (EDT) Cc: avalon@advicom.net, net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org #define quoting(Archie Cobbs) // Anybody know of any X.25 implementations out there? Seems like // a good candidate for a netgraph node. What about AX.25 ? I had to suggest linux to some packet radio users some years ago because linux had AX.25 support, and FreeBSD didn't. I not personally interested in this right now, but if you are looking for example implementations, this might be a good one. Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis M.Sc. Student jonny@jonny.eng.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro "This .sig is not meant to be politically correct." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 10:53:34 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA22170 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:53:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from qnx.com (qnx.com [198.53.31.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA22165 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:53:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nobody@gateway.qnx.com) Received: from gateway.qnx.com (root@gateway.qnx.com [198.53.31.254]) by qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA15467 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:53:18 -0500 Received: (from news@localhost) by gateway.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA14155 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:51:43 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: gateway.qnx.com: news set sender to using -f From: paul@originative.co.uk Subject: RE: if_lnc.c and multicast Date: 22 Jan 1999 13:51:40 -0500 Organization: QNX Software Systems Ltd. Message-ID: To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Eyrich [mailto:michey@prz.tu-berlin.de] > Sent: Friday, January 22, 1999 5:16 PM > To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: if_lnc.c and multicast > > > > > Hello, > > I am looking for someone who is 'responsible' for the lnc network > driver and/or who knows, how to enable the multicast support for it. > > It is already partially enabled by defining LNC_MULTICAST, but the > reception of multicast packets still seems to be impossible. > > The problem: we run a PCI-Ethernet adapter and want to test the > IPv6 Implementation currently available from KAME. > > lnc1: rev 0x25 int a irq 18 on pci0.17.0 > lnc1: PCnet-FAST address 00:60:b0:??:??:?? > > Since IPv6 relies on Multicast (Address configuration) IPv6 > is usable only > if the interface is set into promiscuous mode (e.g. by tcpdump) That'd be me. I wrote the driver years ago and at the time never had a network to test the multicast code on which is why it never got enabled by default. I've got a network of my own these days so I should be able to test it properly. I'm working on the driver this weekend so I'll make sure I sort out multicast while I'm at it. Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 10:53:36 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA22188 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:53:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from qnx.com (qnx.com [198.53.31.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA22164 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:53:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nobody@gateway.qnx.com) Received: from gateway.qnx.com (root@gateway.qnx.com [198.53.31.254]) by qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA31781 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:53:17 -0500 Received: (from news@localhost) by gateway.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA13530 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:40:00 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: gateway.qnx.com: news set sender to using -f From: michey@prz.tu-berlin.de (Michael Eyrich) Subject: if_lnc.c and multicast Date: 22 Jan 1999 13:39:59 -0500 Organization: QNX Software Systems Ltd. Message-ID: To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, I am looking for someone who is 'responsible' for the lnc network driver and/or who knows, how to enable the multicast support for it. It is already partially enabled by defining LNC_MULTICAST, but the reception of multicast packets still seems to be impossible. The problem: we run a PCI-Ethernet adapter and want to test the IPv6 Implementation currently available from KAME. lnc1: rev 0x25 int a irq 18 on pci0.17.0 lnc1: PCnet-FAST address 00:60:b0:??:??:?? Since IPv6 relies on Multicast (Address configuration) IPv6 is usable only if the interface is set into promiscuous mode (e.g. by tcpdump) I would be happy if someone could help! Michael -- Michael Eyrich, PRZ, TU-Berlin michey@prz.tu-berlin.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 11:21:45 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA27061 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:21:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA27054 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:21:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id LAA08078; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:20:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from bubba.whistle.com( 207.76.205.7) by whistle.com via smap (V2.0) id xma008076; Fri, 22 Jan 99 11:20:28 -0800 Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id LAA12135; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:20:28 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199901221920.LAA12135@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: X.25 -> AX.25 ? In-Reply-To: <199901221842.QAA19302@roma.coe.ufrj.br> from Joao Carlos Mendes Luis at "Jan 22, 99 04:42:28 pm" To: jonny@jonny.eng.br (Joao Carlos Mendes Luis) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:20:28 -0800 (PST) Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Joao Carlos Mendes Luis writes: > #define quoting(Archie Cobbs) > // Anybody know of any X.25 implementations out there? Seems like > // a good candidate for a netgraph node. > > What about AX.25 ? I had to suggest linux to some packet radio users > some years ago because linux had AX.25 support, and FreeBSD didn't. Hmm.. what's AX.25? I'm not even that familiar with X.25.. but how is AX.25 different? Thanks, -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 11:50:50 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA01222 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:50:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA01188 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:50:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA01453; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:47:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdgU1448; Fri Jan 22 19:47:45 1999 Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:47:42 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Archie Cobbs cc: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis , net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: X.25 -> AX.25 ? In-Reply-To: <199901221920.LAA12135@bubba.whistle.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org AX.25 is a protocol (very simple) that is used to send packets over radio, using (from memory) async framing.. it's like ppp with addresses where the addresses are ascii callsigns (shifted up one bit). it would be a DEAD SNAP to do AX25 with netgraph but I realised tha twe'd need to make a change to the API. On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Joao Carlos Mendes Luis writes: > > #define quoting(Archie Cobbs) > > // Anybody know of any X.25 implementations out there? Seems like > > // a good candidate for a netgraph node. > > > > What about AX.25 ? I had to suggest linux to some packet radio users > > some years ago because linux had AX.25 support, and FreeBSD didn't. > > Hmm.. what's AX.25? I'm not even that familiar with X.25.. > but how is AX.25 different? > > Thanks, > -Archie > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 12:08:39 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA03293 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:08:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rembrandt.esys.ca (rembrandt.esys.ca [198.161.92.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA03284 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:08:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lyndon@execmail.com) Received: from execmail.com (zappa.esys.ca [198.161.92.28]) by rembrandt.esys.ca (2.1-beta-2/8.9.1/Execmail 2.1) with ESMTP id NAA24103; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:07:27 -0700 Message-Id: <199901222007.NAA24103@rembrandt.esys.ca> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:07:24 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg Subject: Re: X.25 -> AX.25 ? To: archie@whistle.com cc: jonny@jonny.eng.br, net@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199901221920.LAA12135@bubba.whistle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Hmm.. what's AX.25? I'm not even that familiar with X.25.. > but how is AX.25 different? It's a really disgusting link layer framing protocol. Any resemblence to X.25 is purely accidental. http://www.tapr.org/tapr/html/ax25.html if you really want to know ... --lyndon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 12:53:28 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA10114 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:53:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from qnx.com (qnx.com [198.53.31.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA10108 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:53:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nobody@gateway.qnx.com) Received: from gateway.qnx.com (root@gateway.qnx.com [198.53.31.254]) by qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA05359 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:53:15 -0500 Received: (from news@localhost) by gateway.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA20122 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:43:13 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: gateway.qnx.com: news set sender to using -f From: lyndon@execmail.com (Lyndon Nerenberg) Subject: Re: X.25 -> AX.25 ? Date: 22 Jan 1999 15:43:10 -0500 Organization: QNX Software Systems Ltd. Message-ID: <199901222007.NAA24103@rembrandt.esys.ca> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Hmm.. what's AX.25? I'm not even that familiar with X.25.. > but how is AX.25 different? It's a really disgusting link layer framing protocol. Any resemblence to X.25 is purely accidental. http://www.tapr.org/tapr/html/ax25.html if you really want to know ... --lyndon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 12:53:29 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA10128 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:53:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from qnx.com (qnx.com [198.53.31.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA10109 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:53:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nobody@gateway.qnx.com) Received: from gateway.qnx.com (root@gateway.qnx.com [198.53.31.254]) by qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA21780 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:53:16 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by gateway.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA20077 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:42:12 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: gateway.qnx.com: news set sender to using -f From: archie@whistle.com (Archie Cobbs) Subject: Re: X.25 -> AX.25 ? Date: 22 Jan 1999 15:42:05 -0500 Organization: QNX Software Systems Ltd. Message-ID: <199901221920.LAA12135@bubba.whistle.com> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Joao Carlos Mendes Luis writes: > #define quoting(Archie Cobbs) > // Anybody know of any X.25 implementations out there? Seems like > // a good candidate for a netgraph node. > > What about AX.25 ? I had to suggest linux to some packet radio users > some years ago because linux had AX.25 support, and FreeBSD didn't. Hmm.. what's AX.25? I'm not even that familiar with X.25.. but how is AX.25 different? Thanks, -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 12:53:34 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA10164 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:53:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from qnx.com (qnx.com [198.53.31.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA10139 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:53:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nobody@gateway.qnx.com) Received: from gateway.qnx.com (root@gateway.qnx.com [198.53.31.254]) by qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA21818 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:53:17 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by gateway.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA20086 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:42:14 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: gateway.qnx.com: news set sender to using -f From: jonny@jonny.eng.br (Joao Carlos Mendes Luis) Subject: X.25 -> AX.25 ? Date: 22 Jan 1999 15:42:12 -0500 Organization: QNX Software Systems Ltd. Message-ID: <199901221842.QAA19302@roma.coe.ufrj.br> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org #define quoting(Archie Cobbs) // Anybody know of any X.25 implementations out there? Seems like // a good candidate for a netgraph node. What about AX.25 ? I had to suggest linux to some packet radio users some years ago because linux had AX.25 support, and FreeBSD didn't. I not personally interested in this right now, but if you are looking for example implementations, this might be a good one. Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis M.Sc. Student jonny@jonny.eng.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro "This .sig is not meant to be politically correct." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 12:53:36 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA10176 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:53:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from qnx.com (qnx.com [198.53.31.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA10148 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:53:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nobody@gateway.qnx.com) Received: from gateway.qnx.com (root@gateway.qnx.com [198.53.31.254]) by qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA15716 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:53:18 -0500 Received: (from news@localhost) by gateway.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA20069 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:42:10 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: gateway.qnx.com: news set sender to using -f From: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Subject: Re: X.25 -> AX.25 ? Date: 22 Jan 1999 15:42:06 -0500 Organization: QNX Software Systems Ltd. Message-ID: To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org AX.25 is a protocol (very simple) that is used to send packets over radio, using (from memory) async framing.. it's like ppp with addresses where the addresses are ascii callsigns (shifted up one bit). it would be a DEAD SNAP to do AX25 with netgraph but I realised tha twe'd need to make a change to the API. On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Joao Carlos Mendes Luis writes: > > #define quoting(Archie Cobbs) > > // Anybody know of any X.25 implementations out there? Seems like > > // a good candidate for a netgraph node. > > > > What about AX.25 ? I had to suggest linux to some packet radio users > > some years ago because linux had AX.25 support, and FreeBSD didn't. > > Hmm.. what's AX.25? I'm not even that familiar with X.25.. > but how is AX.25 different? > > Thanks, > -Archie > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 14:07:59 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA21238 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:07:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from snowcrest.net (mtshasta.snowcrest.net [207.201.33.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA21230 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:07:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2600 (ppp438.snowcrest.net [209.148.37.70]) by snowcrest.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA03313 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:07:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <025a01be4653$7f03fbf0$0afea8c0@ws2600> From: "Derek Jewett" To: Subject: Static NAT Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:05:35 -0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Is anyone using NAT doing static only translations..? I was just wondering what flags, or files you use to build your static nat list... a file or slap it into the rc.conf file...? Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 15:45:03 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA03098 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:45:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from baerenklau.de.freebsd.org (baerenklau.de.freebsd.org [195.185.195.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA03070 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:44:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wosch@panke.de.freebsd.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by baerenklau.de.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with UUCP id AAA22184 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 00:44:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wosch@panke.de.freebsd.org) Received: (from wosch@localhost) by campa.panke.de.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA03857 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 00:42:10 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from wosch) Message-ID: <19990123004208.A3844@panke.de.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 00:42:08 +0100 From: Wolfram Schneider To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: [obrien@NUXI.com: www.freebsd.org references in research] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ----- Forwarded message from David O'Brien ----- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:17:38 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: webmaster@freebsd.org Subject: www.freebsd.org references in research Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com http://helix.nature.com/webmatters/tomog.html describes a network management tool built on FreeBSD that has even used network connctions to www.freebsd.org for performing network research. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Wolfram Schneider http://freebsd.org/~w/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 17:23:06 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA16972 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 17:23:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from xylan.com (postal.xylan.com [208.8.0.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA16964 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 17:23:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from mailhub.xylan.com by xylan.com (8.8.7/SMI-SVR4 (xylan-mgw 2.2 [OUT])) id RAA05257; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 17:22:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from utah.XYLAN.COM by mailhub.xylan.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4 (mailhub 2.1 [HUB])) id RAA13056; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 17:22:10 -0800 Received: from softweyr.com by utah.XYLAN.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4 (xylan utah [SPOOL])) id SAA20437; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 18:22:09 -0700 Message-ID: <36A92441.8C9298FA@softweyr.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 18:22:09 -0700 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfram Schneider CC: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [obrien@NUXI.com: www.freebsd.org references in research] References: <19990123004208.A3844@panke.de.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Wolfram Schneider wrote: > > ----- Forwarded message from David O'Brien ----- > > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:17:38 -0800 > From: "David O'Brien" > To: webmaster@freebsd.org > Subject: www.freebsd.org references in research > Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com > > http://helix.nature.com/webmatters/tomog.html > > describes a network management tool built on FreeBSD that has even used > network connctions to www.freebsd.org for performing network research. This has already been noted over on -advocacy. ;^) I'm planning to write them a letter inviting them to describe why they choose FreeBSD for their development, and their usage of FreeBSD, in a column for Daemon News. I hope they' participate, with or without the help of a Daemon News staff writer. I now return you to the normal somnambulistic state of freebsd-net... -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters +1.801.915.2061 Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 20:30:12 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA10630 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 20:30:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA10625 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 20:30:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@FreeBSD.org) From: Julian Elischer Received: (from julian@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id UAA07027 for net; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 20:30:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 20:30:12 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199901230430.UAA07027@freefall.freebsd.org> To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: netgraph patch error Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org the patches to if_sr.c and if_ar.c were damaged by a bug in freefall's CVS server (that's another story) the file has been replaced... ftp://ftp.whistle.com/pub/archie/misc/netgraph.tgz (no other real changes) in one of them a leading "+" was missing from a line around 770 I can't remember what the other had wrong other than it probably had a line truncated and the next line appended (the symptom of that error). A Makefile also failed to patch but the fix is obvious (someone has edited the file) If you don't need the sr or ar drivers you probably don't care. julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Jan 23 09:15:24 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA23943 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 09:15:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA23935 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 09:15:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA26033; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 09:14:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from s204m82.isp.whistle.com(207.76.204.82) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdk26030; Sat Jan 23 17:14:17 1999 Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 09:14:13 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer X-Sender: julian@s204m82.isp.whistle.com To: John Hay cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG, Archie Cobbs Subject: Re: netgraph stuff In-Reply-To: <199901231637.SAA29802@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, John Hay wrote: > Julian, > > > ftp://ftp.whistle.com/pub/archie/misc/netgraph.tgz > > > > Includes a readme that hopefully will make sense. > > > > needs a current kernel < 2 days old > > > > either 3.x or 4.x will do. the crucial fix got in with hours to spare. > > I have tried the latest one, but I can't get it to compile. > > In modules/netgraph it dies with: > > --------- > cc -O -pipe -Wall -I/usr/src.freefall/sys -DKERNEL -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wunused -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I/usr/src.freefall/sys -I/usr/src/sys/modules/netgraph/netgraph -I/usr/src/sys/modules/netgraph/netgraph/@ -c /usr/src/sys/modules/netgraph/netgraph/../../../netgraph/ng_base.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/netgraph/netgraph/../../../netgraph/ng_base.c: In function `ngb_mod_event': > /usr/src/sys/modules/netgraph/netgraph/../../../netgraph/ng_base.c:1357: `NETISR_NG' undeclared (first use this function) > -------- > > I have changed NETISR_NETGRAPH in net/netisr.h to NETISR_NG and then I got > further. The next place it dies is inside if_sr.c and if_ar.c when it tries > to include i386/isa/if_sr.h and i386/isa/if_ar.h respectively. Those files > does not exist. doh! that is why we were waiting for "make world" to work again.. so we could try it from scratch again.. you are correct in your fix. also here are the two missing .h files for sys/i386/isa if_sr.h: /* * if_sr.h * * Copyright (C) 1997-1999 Whistle Communications Inc. * All rights reserved. */ #ifndef _I386_ISA_IF_SR_H_ #define _I386_ISA_IF_SR_H_ /* Node type name and type cookie */ #define NG_SR_NODE_TYPE "sync_sr" #define NG_SR_COOKIE 860552149 /* Netgraph hooks */ #define NG_SR_HOOK_DEBUG "debug" #define NG_SR_HOOK_CONTROL "control" #define NG_SR_HOOK_RAW "rawdata" #endif /* _I386_ISA_IF_SR_H_ */ if_ar.h: /* * if_ar.h * * Copyright (C) 1997-1999 Whistle Communications Inc. * All rights reserved. */ #ifndef _I386_ISA_IF_AR_H_ #define _I386_ISA_IF_AR_H_ /* Node type name and type cookie */ #define NG_AR_NODE_TYPE "sync_ar" #define NG_AR_COOKIE 860552149 /* Netgraph hooks */ #define NG_AR_HOOK_DEBUG "debug" #define NG_AR_HOOK_CONTROL "control" #define NG_AR_HOOK_RAW "rawdata" #endif /* _I386_ISA_IF_AR_H_ */ > > Are you sure you have the right version on your ftp site? > > John > -- > John Hay -- John.Hay@mikom.csir.co.za > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Jan 23 13:55:44 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA21213 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 13:55:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA21207 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 13:55:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id NAA23120; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 13:55:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from bubba.whistle.com( 207.76.205.7) by whistle.com via smap (V2.0) id xma023118; Sat, 23 Jan 99 13:55:12 -0800 Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id NAA19562; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 13:55:12 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199901232155.NAA19562@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Netgraph beta (rev. 3) To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 13:55:11 -0800 (PST) Cc: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The netgraph beta tarball has (again) been updated. There were two missing files that are now included, if_sr.h and if_ar.h. Also fixed a compile problem relating to NETISR_NETGRAPH. ftp://ftp.whistle.com/pub/archie/misc/netgraph.tgz Sorry about that! (not being able to do a make world for the past two or three days hasn't helped... ) -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message