From owner-freebsd-net Sun Aug 1 8:15:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from arc.netlab.sk (arc.netlab.sk [195.168.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BC514C86 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 08:15:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tps@ti.sk) Received: from tps (root@qwyx.netlab.sk [195.168.0.2]) by arc.netlab.sk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA04814 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 17:13:55 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: From: "Tomas TPS Ulej" To: Subject: TRANSPROXY Problem Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 17:13:39 +0200 Message-ID: <09fd01bedc30$6fae7e00$2327a8c3@tps.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm running FreeBSD r4 and I want use transproxy for bounce telnet. My problem is: Script started on Sun Aug 1 14:45:48 1999 root# /usr/local/sbin/tproxy -t -s 23 195.168.0.2 23 open(/dev/ipnat): Device not configured root# /usr/local/sbin/tproxy -s 23 195.168.0.2 23 open(/dev/ipnat): Device not configured root# cd /dev root# ./MAKEDEV ipl root# /usr/local/sbin/tproxy -t -s 23 195.168.0.2 23 open(/dev/ipnat): Device not configured Script done on Sun Aug 1 14:46:37 1999 Where is the problem? My kernel includes now: options IPDIVERT options IPFIREWALL options IPSTEALTH options DUMMYNET options BRIDGE options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD options IPFILTER_LOG Thanx for any idea -TPS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Aug 1 18:44:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from cheddar.netmonger.net (cheddar.netmonger.net [209.54.21.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBEA14C40 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 18:44:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@cheddar.netmonger.net) Received: (from chris@localhost) by cheddar.netmonger.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA21068; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 21:43:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19990801214302.A19917@netmonger.net> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 21:43:02 -0400 From: Christopher Masto To: Greg Black , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does the ep driver work under 3.2-release? Mail-Followup-To: Greg Black , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <19990731093613.17512.qmail@alice.gba.oz.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <19990731093613.17512.qmail@alice.gba.oz.au>; from Greg Black on Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 07:36:12PM +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 07:36:12PM +1000, Greg Black wrote: > 1 3C5x9 board(s) on ISA found at 0x300 > ep0 at 0x300-0x30f irq 10 on ISA > ep0: aui/utp/bnc[*UTP*] address 00:60:08:ac:d7:1b It is important to make sure nothing else in your machine is using IRQ 10. I find it neccessary here to tell the BIOS that 10 is used by an ISA device, otherwise PnP tends to put something there and prevent ep from working. -- Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications chris@netmonger.net info@netmonger.net http://www.netmonger.net Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon -- http://www.freebsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 7: 8:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from twilight.tpgi.com.au (twilight.tpgi.com.au [203.29.147.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5586215138 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 07:08:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@twilight.tpgi.com.au) Received: (qmail 4171 invoked by uid 1002); 2 Aug 1999 14:07:01 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:07:01 +1000 (EST) Reply-To: chrisk@tpgi.com.au From: Chris Keladis To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: ed0 or ed1? Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I am experiencing some rather odd results with my FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE box. For some reason my PCI RealTek (NE-2000 clone) network card is detecting as ed1 rather than the first (read: only) network card in the system. Does this have something to do with strange motherboard PCI slot ordering? A sample dmesg output: ed1: rev 0x00 int a irq 10 on pci0.11.0 ed1: address 00:00:01:00:a6:f7, type NE2000 (16 bit) And in the kernel config file, i've specified: device ed0 I thought this might have something to do with specifying ed0 as a device, and the card gets logically assigned ed1, but the NIC wont detect at all without that line. It works fine as it is, i guess, but i am very curious to work this one out :-) Regards, Chris. ---------------------------------- Chris Keladis TPG Internet System Administrator E-Mail: Chris Keladis Local Date: 03-Aug-99 Local Time: 00:01:08 ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 7:54: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from wopr.caltech.edu (wopr.caltech.edu [131.215.240.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B891507F for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 07:53:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mph@wopr.caltech.edu) Received: (from mph@localhost) by wopr.caltech.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id HAA89472; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 07:52:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mph) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 07:52:54 -0700 From: Matthew Hunt To: chrisk@tpgi.com.au Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ed0 or ed1? Message-ID: <19990802075254.A89367@wopr.caltech.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Chris Keladis on Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 12:07:01AM +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 12:07:01AM +1000, Chris Keladis wrote: > ed1: rev 0x00 int a irq 10 on pci0.11.0 > ed1: address 00:00:01:00:a6:f7, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > And in the kernel config file, i've specified: > > device ed0 I think the reasoning goes like this, and I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong: PCI devices are discovered earlier in the boot process than ISA devices. Therefore, when PCI devices are found, the kernel doesn't yet know what ISA devices will be present. If a driver supports both PCI and ISA devices (as "ed" does), PCI unit numbers will start at 1, to leave 0 available for ISA devices found later. This phenomenon is also observed with "pcm", the sound driver. It seems that PnP ISA devices are found before non-PnP ones, so most people with PnP sound cards end up with a pcm1 instead of a pcm0. This behavior is normal and expected, and you shouldn't worry about it. Matt -- Matthew Hunt * Science rules. http://www.pobox.com/~mph/ * To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 8: 1:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from 60-Hz.Powered-By.AC (226-193.adsl2.avtel.net [207.71.226.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6397D150C8 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 08:01:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dburr@Powered-By.AC) Received: from localhost (dburr@localhost) by 60-Hz.Powered-By.AC (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA59790; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 07:59:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dburr@Powered-By.AC) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 07:59:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Donald Burr To: chrisk@tpgi.com.au Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ed0 or ed1? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Try this instead device ed? at pci? This got my Realtek detected as ed0, and everything works fine. ed0: rev 0x00 int a irq 5 on pci0.11.0 ed0: address 00:20:18:57:eb:e7, type NE2000 (16 bit) Donald Burr WEB: http://www.Powered-By.AC/ PO Box 91212, Santa Barbara, CA 93190-1212 Tel:(805)957-9666 FAX:(800)492-5954 Member and software developer withThe FreBSD Project - http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ *** FreeBSD *** A FREE, 32 Bit UNIX OS for PC's -- The Power to Serve! On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Chris Keladis wrote: > Hi, > > I am experiencing some rather odd results with my FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE box. > > For some reason my PCI RealTek (NE-2000 clone) network card is detecting as ed1 > rather than the first (read: only) network card in the system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 9:10: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz (ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.19.221]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66D914FB4 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 09:09:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mkop5230@ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz) Received: from u-us0.ms.mff.cuni.cz (mkop5230@u-us0.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.16.40]) by ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA12928; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 18:09:19 +0200 Received: from localhost (mkop5230@localhost) by u-us0.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA09594; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 18:09:17 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 18:09:15 +0200 (MET DST) From: Milan Kopacka Reply-To: Milan Kopacka To: Tomas TPS Ulej Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: TRANSPROXY Problem In-Reply-To: <09fd01bedc30$6fae7e00$2327a8c3@tps.sk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Tomas TPS Ulej wrote: Hi, > I'm running FreeBSD r4 and I want use transproxy for bounce telnet. > My problem is: > > Script started on Sun Aug 1 14:45:48 1999 > root# /usr/local/sbin/tproxy -t -s 23 195.168.0.2 23 > open(/dev/ipnat): Device not configured > root# /usr/local/sbin/tproxy -s 23 195.168.0.2 23 > open(/dev/ipnat): Device not configured > root# cd /dev > root# ./MAKEDEV ipl > root# /usr/local/sbin/tproxy -t -s 23 195.168.0.2 23 > open(/dev/ipnat): Device not configured > Script done on Sun Aug 1 14:46:37 1999 > > Where is the problem? My kernel includes now: > > options IPDIVERT > options IPFIREWALL > options IPSTEALTH > options DUMMYNET > options BRIDGE > options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD > options IPFILTER_LOG > > Thanx for any idea I think, you are missing the IPFILTER option. Milan Kopacka -- ... a koho system nachyta na procesoru, tomu snizi prioritu. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 12:12:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from arc.netlab.sk (arc.netlab.sk [195.168.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BCF14D93 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 12:12:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tps@arc.netlab.sk) Received: from tps (root@qwyx.netlab.sk [195.168.0.2]) by arc.netlab.sk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA10866; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 21:11:02 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: From: "Tomas TPS Ulej" To: "Milan Kopacka" Cc: Subject: RE: TRANSPROXY Problem Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 21:10:53 +0200 Message-ID: <000001bedd1a$be7b6a80$6f01a8c0@tps.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > options IPDIVERT > > options IPFIREWALL > > options IPSTEALTH > > options DUMMYNET > > options BRIDGE > > options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD > > options IPFILTER_LOG > > > > Thanx for any idea > > I think, you are missing the IPFILTER option. > > Milan Kopacka ok, NOW are included options ONLY: IPFILTER IPFILTER_LOG and situation: root@[Fuzzy /root] # /usr/local/sbin/tproxy -t -s 4444 space.netlab.sk 3128 after: root@[Fuzzy /root] # telnet 0 4444 Trying 0.0.0.0... Aug 2 10:07:19 Fuzzy tproxy[287]: ioctl(SIOCGNATL): No such process Aug 2 10:07:19 Fuzzy tproxy[287]: ioctl(SIOCGNATL): No such process Connected to 0. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. Any idea? -- Tomas 'TPS' Ulej tps@ti.sk, tu36-ripe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 12:15:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from homer.web-ex.com (homer.web-ex.com [209.54.66.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5383D14D93 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 12:15:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jim@web-ex.com) Received: from localhost (jim@localhost) by homer.web-ex.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA51163; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:14:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@web-ex.com) X-Authentication-Warning: homer.web-ex.com: jim owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:14:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Cassata To: chrisk@tpgi.com.au Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ed0 or ed1? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org this is normal for PCI NE2000s On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Chris Keladis wrote: > Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:07:01 +1000 (EST) > From: Chris Keladis > Reply-To: chrisk@tpgi.com.au > To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: ed0 or ed1? > > Hi, > > I am experiencing some rather odd results with my FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE box. > > For some reason my PCI RealTek (NE-2000 clone) network card is detecting as ed1 > rather than the first (read: only) network card in the system. > > Does this have something to do with strange motherboard PCI slot ordering? > > A sample dmesg output: > > ed1: rev 0x00 int a irq 10 on pci0.11.0 > ed1: address 00:00:01:00:a6:f7, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > > And in the kernel config file, i've specified: > > device ed0 > > > I thought this might have something to do with specifying ed0 as a device, and > the card gets logically assigned ed1, but the NIC wont detect at all without > that line. > > It works fine as it is, i guess, but i am very curious to work this one out :-) > > > > > Regards, > > Chris. > > ---------------------------------- > Chris Keladis > TPG Internet System Administrator > > E-Mail: Chris Keladis > Local Date: 03-Aug-99 > Local Time: 00:01:08 > ---------------------------------- > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > Jim Cassata 516.421.6000 jim@web-ex.com Web Express 20 Broadhollow Road Suite 3011 Melville, NY 11747 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 12:38:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz (ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.19.221]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6AE14CCD for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 12:38:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mkop5230@ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz) Received: from u-us0.ms.mff.cuni.cz (mkop5230@u-us0.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.16.40]) by ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA03880; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 21:37:24 +0200 Received: from localhost (mkop5230@localhost) by u-us0.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA14382; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 21:37:21 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 21:37:21 +0200 (MET DST) From: Milan Kopacka Reply-To: Milan Kopacka To: tps@ti.sk Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: TRANSPROXY Problem In-Reply-To: <000001bedd1a$be7b6a80$6f01a8c0@tps.sk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Tomas TPS Ulej wrote: > root@[Fuzzy /root] # /usr/local/sbin/tproxy -t -s 4444 space.netlab.sk 3128 > > after: > > root@[Fuzzy /root] # telnet 0 4444 > Trying 0.0.0.0... > Aug 2 10:07:19 Fuzzy tproxy[287]: ioctl(SIOCGNATL): No such process > Aug 2 10:07:19 Fuzzy tproxy[287]: ioctl(SIOCGNATL): No such process > Connected to 0. > Escape character is '^]'. > Connection closed by foreign host. > > Any idea? You need to have NAT configured - for example ipnat -f - < 127.0.0.1 port 4444 EOF Milan Kopacka To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 14:39:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2E814C20 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 14:38:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@cyrus.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (robert@fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA10548 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 17:38:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@cyrus.watson.org) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 17:38:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org Reply-To: Robert Watson To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Bell Atlantic recently sent me this email indicating they plan to migrate their DSL service to using PPP over Ethernet. I'm not familiar with this encapsulation, but assume that it's something we'd like to support if we don't already. Does anyone know anything about this? (I'm also a little concerned by this "log on / log off" being a benefit--sounds like the opportunity to charge for connect-time :-). Robert N M Watson robert@fledge.watson.org http://www.watson.org/~robert/ PGP key fingerprint: AF B5 5F FF A6 4A 79 37 ED 5F 55 E9 58 04 6A B1 TIS Labs at Network Associates, Computing Laboratory at Cambridge University Safeport Network Services ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 21:20:42 -0000 From: "Bell Atlantic PPPoE Trail Team"@fledge.watson.org To: "Bell Atlantic.net Subscribers"@fledge.watson.org Subject: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" Dear Bell Atlantic.net Subscriber, We'd like to invite you to join us in an exciting trial of a new version of our high-speed, broadband alternative to your existing Bell Atlantic.net service. Many Bell Atlantic.net customers are enjoying the current version of Infospeed DSL, which provides ultra high-speed Internet connectivity up to 126 times faster than a 56K analog modem over regular copper telephone lines. It allows you to connect to the Internet while simultaneously using your phone or fax over the same line. And you do not have to dial in -- just click on Netscape or any other Internet application and you're automatically on the 'Net. No busy signals. No premature disconnects. It's "always on." Bell Atlantic Internet Solutions, along with Bell Atlantic High Speed Solutions Center, is excited to announce a trial of our new version of Infospeed DSL - Infospeed DSL with PPPoE, a network architecture which includes dynamic IP addressing and greater user control through an authentication (logging in) process. For the trial, which will begin on or about August 1 and last for about three weeks, we are looking for a total of 25 participants who live in the Washington, DC metropolitan area (DC, suburban Maryland, or northern Virginia) who would like to try DSL Internet connectivity with PPPoE at their homes at no cost and with no obligation. Details of the trial follow: Description of trial (and differences of PPPoE architecture from our current DSL architecture): 1. Limited trial of PPPoE (Point-to-Point Protocol over Ethernet) Internet connectivity with DSL. (Current DSL architecture is bridged Ethernet. Pending the outcome of the trial, all DSL customers will eventually be migrated to PPPoE.) 2. Participants will upgrade their current Bell Atlantic.net accounts to PPPoE DSL through an automated on-line system, using DSL software supplied by Bell Atlantic.net and installed on their DSL-enabled computer. (Automatic registration or account upgrade to DSL is not available with our current DSL architecture.) 3. PPPoE distributes dynamic IP addresses and allows customers to log off the Internet without having to shut down their computers. (With the current DSL architecture, customers disconnect from the Internet only when they turn off their computers.) Cost: 1. Infospeed DSL with Bell Atlantic.net will be FREE for the trial. Participants will be provided with a free DSL modem and a free Ethernet card if they don't already have one. DSL installation at your home will also be free. 2. You will be billed the one-time network connection charge of $99, and the monthly charge for the DSL feature, which is between $49.95 and $189.95, depending on the package you choose. However, as soon as you use the DSL software to upgrade your current account to DSL, Bell Atlantic Internet Solutions will send you a check to fully reimburse you for the network connection charge and one month of DSL service. So participating in our trial will cost you nothing. 3. If you decide to keep Infospeed DSL following the trial, you will be billed monthly for the DSL package you selected. Select your package carefully when you sign up for the trial. If you want to change speeds when the trial ends, you will be responsible for the $99 service-change fee. You may keep all the equipment at no charge. If you decide not to keep Infospeed DSL service following the trial, we will change your account type back to what it currently is, at no charge, and arrange for you to return the DSL modem to us. What you have to do: 1. If you are interested in participating in the trial, please reply to this message (send to pppoetrial@bellatlantic.net) as soon as possible. 2. Include in your reply: Your name: Your home phone number: Best time to contact you and a contact phone number if different from your home phone number: The kind of computer (PC or MAC) and operating system (Windows 95/98, NT version, MacOS version) you use (please see below for minimum system requirements): Your current Bell Atlantic.net User ID: Your current Internet connection type (analog, ISDN, DSL): What will happen next: 1. In order to get DSL service, your home must be "loop qualified" to determine that we can bring DSL service to your home. 2. When we receive your reply with your home phone number, we will loop qualify your home. 3. You will be notified concerning your acceptance for the trial, and if qualified you will receive, by email to your Bell Atlantic.net email address, full instructions for signing up and scheduling your DSL installation. 4. Toward the end of the trial, you will be asked to complete a survey about your experience with the PPPoE version of Bell Atlantic Infospeed DSL, answering questions about its ease of use, performance, registration process, technical support quality, etc. The results of this survey will be used to help us improve our ability to deliver this exciting broadband solution. Remember, we can only accept the first 25 qualified participants. If you are interested, please reply right away. We look forward to your participation in our PPPoE trial. Thank you. Bell Atlantic.net PPPoE Trial Team Minimum System Requirements for Infospeed DSL service: WINDOWS-BASED COMPUTERS: -------------------------- *Pentium 100MHz or better *Windows 95 or higher; Windows NT 4.0 or higher (w/ Service Pack 3.0) *32 MB RAM *4X CD-ROM *Resources and slot for Ethernet adapter (if one not already available) *25 MB hard disk space MACINTOSH COMPUTERS: --------------------------- *Apple iMAC or Apple Power Macintosh or compatible with a Power PC processor *Mac OS system software version 7.5.3 (Open Transport 1.1) or later *32 MB RAM *4X CD-ROM *10BASE-T Ethernet Network Adapter *25 MB free hard disk space To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 15: 2:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from assaris.sics.se (assaris.sics.se [193.10.66.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7049B14ED0 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:02:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from assar@sics.se) Received: (from assar@localhost) by assaris.sics.se (8.9.3/8.7.3) id AAA02528; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:02:29 +0200 (CEST) To: Robert Watson Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.68) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Assar Westerlund Date: 03 Aug 1999 00:02:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: Robert Watson's message of "Mon, 2 Aug 1999 17:38:15 -0400 (EDT)" Message-ID: <5l1zdl264r.fsf@assaris.sics.se> Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Robert Watson writes: > Bell Atlantic recently sent me this email indicating they plan to migrate > their DSL service to using PPP over Ethernet. I'm not familiar with this > encapsulation, but assume that it's something we'd like to support if we > don't already. Does anyone know anything about this? I seem to recall that Jason Thorpe was hacking (or talking about hacking) support for this into NetBSD. I guess you have already read RFC2516? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 16:42:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from awfulhak.org (dynamic-101.max1-du-ws.dialnetwork.pavilion.co.uk [212.74.8.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB66315080 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:42:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.8]) by awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA01335; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 23:35:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@lan.awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA02682; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 23:36:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199908022236.XAA02682@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Robert Watson Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Aug 1999 17:38:15 EDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 23:36:23 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org robert@cyrus.watson.org said: > Bell Atlantic recently sent me this email indicating they plan to > migrate their DSL service to using PPP over Ethernet. I'm not > familiar with this encapsulation, but assume that it's something we'd > like to support if we don't already. Does anyone know anything about > this? Doug White's got a working implementation. User-ppp needs to be a bit smarter in the datalink DIAL state by abstracting the expect-send bit into a device-specific chat implementation. Once this is done, the PPPoE discovery bit should be a fairly trivial exercise by opening /dev/bpfX (I think). I've got a *lot* of stuff on my todo list at the moment though :-( -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 17:53: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from wiggum.com (ip31.sb.net [209.241.234.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DB315232 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 17:53:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from engr@wiggum.com) Received: by wiggum.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id RAA56853 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 17:52:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from engr) From: Xiaodong Shen Reply-To: xshen@sb.net Organization: Warp9tech To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: unix domain socket Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:39:25 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.17] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <99080217524106.55844@wiggum.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-KMail-Mark: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi there, I run a very simple client-server program using Unix Domain Socket on FreeBSD and Linux, the server part looks like this: for(;;){ unlink foo; //foo is something like a pipe on local file system open_socket; //AF_UNIX and SOCK_STREAM, get a socket say fd_listen bind; // with foo listen; // say on listening socket: fd_listen, len_queue = 5 select; // select on fd_listen accept; //get a new socket say fd_conn do_something; // on the socket fd_conn close(fd_conn); close(fd_listen); } On the client side I fork several child processes to simulate concurrent connections to the server. Results: Linux: all the connections are caught and handled by server. FreeBSD: some of the connections are missed during select() on server. Question: For FreeBSD when you close the listening socket, those connnections left in the listening queue that have not accepted by server will be cleared immediately in stead of hanging there like the case for Linux, is that right? Is there any BSD expert could give an explanation of what really happen in BSD's kernel? Should this be considered a bug of FreeBSD? Thanks a lot, Xiaodong Shen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 2 20:38: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (whizzo.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C88D14CAE for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 20:38:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.transsys.com) Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1]) by whizzo.transsys.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA08095; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 23:36:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.transsys.com) Message-Id: <199908030336.XAA08095@whizzo.transsys.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Brian Somers Cc: Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Louis A. Mamakos" Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) References: <199908022236.XAA02682@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Aug 1999 23:36:23 BST." <199908022236.XAA02682@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 23:36:33 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > robert@cyrus.watson.org said: > > Bell Atlantic recently sent me this email indicating they plan to > > migrate their DSL service to using PPP over Ethernet. I'm not > > familiar with this encapsulation, but assume that it's something we'd > > like to support if we don't already. Does anyone know anything about > > this? > > Doug White's got a working implementation. > > User-ppp needs to be a bit smarter in the datalink DIAL state by > abstracting the expect-send bit into a device-specific chat > implementation. Once this is done, the PPPoE discovery bit should be > a fairly trivial exercise by opening /dev/bpfX (I think). I think, actually, that all of the PPP traffic will end up coming and going via BPF, since PPPoE uses it's own ethernet types. At least this is the way we ended up doing a prototype test implemention, also using the user-mode PPP daemon. (And sorry, by the time we finish up with the lawyers trying to get the code pried loose, you'll be done already. Sigh.) If you run into problems along the way, please let me know, and I'll try to hook you up with the guy at UUNET that did our prototype PPPoE client implementation. It was done on BSDi, but I don't think that's of any real significance. I think that he might have actually started with the FreeBSD user-mode PPP, but I'm not completely sure. It would be pretty interesting to do a netgraph implementation of this.. louie (a.k.a. louie@UU.NET) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 3 0:16: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.prophetnetworks.net (mail.prophetnetworks.net [63.71.252.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BC415220 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:15:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bvaughn@prophetnetworks.net) Received: from shell01.prophetnetworks.net (bvaughn@shell01.prophetnetworks.net [63.71.252.10]) by mail.prophetnetworks.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA17977 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 02:17:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bvaughn@prophetnetworks.net) Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 02:14:18 -0500 (EST) From: Ben Vaughn To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Modifications for netstat? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, Just noticed that FreeBSD netstat doesnt contain the -e flag (in Linux, shows the username owning a certain port.) Anybody know who I would contact to ask that this feature be inserted into fbsd netstat? Thanks, -biv To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 3 0:31:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from gw.caamora.com.au (jonath5.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.41.237]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B3914E52 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:31:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jon@gw.caamora.com.au) Received: (from jon@localhost) by gw.caamora.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA10954; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:30:22 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jon) Message-ID: <19990803173021.A10638@caamora.com.au> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:30:21 +1000 From: jonathan michaels To: Brian Somers , Robert Watson Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) Mail-Followup-To: Brian Somers , Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <199908022236.XAA02682@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199908022236.XAA02682@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org>; from Brian Somers on Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:36:23PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD gw.caamora.com.au 2.2.7-RELEASE i386 X-Mood: i'm alive, if it counts Organisation: Caamora, PO Box 144, Rosebery NSW 1445 Australia Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:36:23PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > robert@cyrus.watson.org said: > > Bell Atlantic recently sent me this email indicating they plan to > > migrate their DSL service to using PPP over Ethernet. I'm not > > familiar with this encapsulation, but assume that it's something we'd > > like to support if we don't already. Does anyone know anything about > > this? > > Doug White's got a working implementation. > > User-ppp needs to be a bit smarter in the datalink DIAL state by > abstracting the expect-send bit into a device-specific chat > implementation. Once this is done, the PPPoE discovery bit should be > a fairly trivial exercise by opening /dev/bpfX (I think). would it be possible to run PPPoE with kernel ppp ? or would kernel users have to switch over to userland based ppp ? regards jonathan ps thx brian fro your help recently. -- =============================================================================== Jonathan Michaels PO Box 144, Rosebery, NSW 1445 Australia =========================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 3 1:54:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.128.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B4814F28 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 01:54:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA39473; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 09:53:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA00822; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 09:54:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199908030854.JAA00822@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: jonathan michaels Cc: Brian Somers , Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Aug 1999 17:30:21 +1000." <19990803173021.A10638@caamora.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 09:54:39 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:36:23PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > > robert@cyrus.watson.org said: > > > Bell Atlantic recently sent me this email indicating they plan to > > > migrate their DSL service to using PPP over Ethernet. I'm not > > > familiar with this encapsulation, but assume that it's something we'd > > > like to support if we don't already. Does anyone know anything about > > > this? > > > > Doug White's got a working implementation. > > > > User-ppp needs to be a bit smarter in the datalink DIAL state by > > abstracting the expect-send bit into a device-specific chat > > implementation. Once this is done, the PPPoE discovery bit should be > > a fairly trivial exercise by opening /dev/bpfX (I think). > > would it be possible to run PPPoE with kernel ppp ? or would > kernel users have to switch over to userland based ppp ? You'd need to find someone willing to write it.... this probably means going to the author. WRT PPPoE in user-ppp, at the moment, I'm only interested - I'm too busy to write it (unless someone wanted to pay me lots of money :-) > regards > > jonathan > > ps thx brian fro your help recently. Sure, no problem :-) > -- > =============================================================================== > Jonathan Michaels > PO Box 144, Rosebery, NSW 1445 Australia > =========================================================== -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 3 5:54:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from gw.caamora.com.au (jonath5.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.41.237]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9EC14D2C for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 05:54:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jon@gw.caamora.com.au) Received: (from jon@localhost) by gw.caamora.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA11432; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 22:53:26 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jon) Message-ID: <19990803225325.E10638@caamora.com.au> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 22:53:25 +1000 From: jonathan michaels To: Brian Somers Cc: Brian Somers , Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) Mail-Followup-To: Brian Somers , Brian Somers , Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <19990803173021.A10638@caamora.com.au> <199908030854.JAA00822@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199908030854.JAA00822@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org>; from Brian Somers on Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 09:54:39AM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD gw.caamora.com.au 2.2.7-RELEASE i386 X-Mood: i'm alive, if it counts Organisation: Caamora, PO Box 144, Rosebery NSW 1445 Australia Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org brian, On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 09:54:39AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:36:23PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > > > robert@cyrus.watson.org said: > > > > Bell Atlantic recently sent me this email indicating they plan to > > > > migrate their DSL service to using PPP over Ethernet. I'm not > > > > familiar with this encapsulation, but assume that it's something we'd > > > > like to support if we don't already. Does anyone know anything about > > > > this? > > > > > > Doug White's got a working implementation. > > > > > > User-ppp needs to be a bit smarter in the datalink DIAL state by > > > abstracting the expect-send bit into a device-specific chat > > > implementation. Once this is done, the PPPoE discovery bit should be > > > a fairly trivial exercise by opening /dev/bpfX (I think). > > > > would it be possible to run PPPoE with kernel ppp ? or would > > kernel users have to switch over to userland based ppp ? > > You'd need to find someone willing to write it.... this probably > means going to the author. cap in hand, looking fro knee pads, i'm off and grovelling (grin sort off). > WRT PPPoE in user-ppp, at the moment, I'm only interested - I'm too > busy to write it (unless someone wanted to pay me lots of money :-) i realise that all things bright and shiney are seen as must haves, but could you (briefly and not so technically) explain to me and the others who may also be wondering what real advantage PPPoE would offer to endusers. or, please point to a reading list, bibliography, rfc, etc etc. regards, jonathan -- =============================================================================== Jonathan Michaels PO Box 144, Rosebery, NSW 1445 Australia =========================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 3 6:21:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.128.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D864152B6 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 06:21:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA41650; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:20:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA07776; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:21:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199908031321.OAA07776@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: jonathan michaels Cc: Brian Somers , Brian Somers , Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Aug 1999 22:53:25 +1000." <19990803225325.E10638@caamora.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 14:21:54 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org jon@caamora.com.au said: > i realise that all things bright and shiney are seen as must haves, > but could you (briefly and not so technically) explain to me and the > others who may also be wondering what real advantage PPPoE would > offer to endusers. > > or, please point to a reading list, bibliography, rfc, etc etc. Well, the reading matter's in rfc2516. The basic idea is for ISPs that want to provide ethernet based media to individual subscribers that have no requirement to talk directly to each other - ie, things like ADSL I believe. The reason PPPoE is used is to supply the session-control and authentication side of things. The ISP may have several gateway machines on the LAN, and each subscriber will broadcast a request to connect to a gateway. When they're accepted a ppp connection results using the ethernet as a transport. Personally, I prefer the idea of having something like PPPoUDP instead. This would provide all the same facilities, be very easy to implement (user-ppp can do it already!) and would be routable, all for a very small encapsulation overhead. -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 3 6:25:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from tsunami.waterspout.com (tsunami.waterspout.com [208.13.56.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81681529B for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 06:25:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from csg@tsunami.waterspout.com) Received: (from csg@localhost) by tsunami.waterspout.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) id IAA96402; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 08:25:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from csg) Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 08:25:11 -0500 From: "C. Stephen Gunn" To: Ben Vaughn Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Modifications for netstat? Message-ID: <19990803082511.A96361@tsunami.waterspout.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Ben Vaughn on Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 02:14:18AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 02:14:18AM -0500, Ben Vaughn wrote: > Just noticed that FreeBSD netstat doesnt contain the -e flag (in > Linux, shows the username owning a certain port.) Anybody know who I would > contact to ask that this feature be inserted into fbsd netstat? In the interim you could check out LSOF. It will show you the info you want, and more about any open file on the system. ports/sysutils/lsof - Steve -- WaterSpout Communications, Inc. csg@waterspout.com 427 North 6th Street http://www.waterspout.com/ Lafayette, IN 47901 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 3 6:40:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C82814D85 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 06:40:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost (billf@localhost) by jade.chc-chimes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA23166; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 08:42:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 08:42:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Ben Vaughn Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Modifications for netstat? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ben Vaughn wrote: > Hello, > Just noticed that FreeBSD netstat doesnt contain the -e flag (in > Linux, shows the username owning a certain port.) Anybody know who I would > contact to ask that this feature be inserted into fbsd netstat? 'sockstat(1)' -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 3 6:45:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (whizzo.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCF014ED3 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 06:45:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.transsys.com) Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1]) by whizzo.transsys.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA09965; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 09:45:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.transsys.com) Message-Id: <199908031345.JAA09965@whizzo.transsys.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Brian Somers Cc: jonathan michaels , Brian Somers , Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Louis A. Mamakos" Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) References: <199908031321.OAA07776@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Aug 1999 14:21:54 BST." <199908031321.OAA07776@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 09:45:17 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Personally, I prefer the idea of having something like PPPoUDP > instead. This would provide all the same facilities, be very easy to > implement (user-ppp can do it already!) and would be routable, all > for a very small encapsulation overhead. This already exists; it's called L2TP. One of the desires for PPPoE was that an ISP could install a *DSL connection to a customer, and use Ethernet as the medium between the DSL "modem" CPE device and your PC(s). Using something like L2TP would require that the DSL "modem" device either: - be configured with an address that "works" on your ethernet segment - acts as a DHCP server and tells the other devices on the LAN what their IP addresses need to be. The first alterantive means a higher customer support cost - more configuration knows that will be set wrong. The second alternative means you break whatever existing LAN stuff is going on. So PPPoE runs over "raw" Ethernet MAC frames to get across the LAN from the PC to the DSL modem. There's no configuration of the CPE device, so it's hard to get the knobs set wrong. This aspect is of serious concern because DSL services are fairly low margin, and you can't afford to have a guy (or two!) in truck go around to every customer to turn on the service, or many suppport phone calls. You have to keep in the back of your mind that there are legions of consumer/residential Windows users that are the primary audience for this technology, and the associated support and operation costs of running this kind of network are always of concern. This is the whole reason for ADSL "lite" (Or "G.lite") - it's not supposed to require a "splitter" at the subscriber premisis, so the desperate hope is that the service can be turned up on your existing POTS phone line with no one making a service call to "install" the service at your residence. "Normal" ADSL requires a splitter to be installed because the ADSL modulation can be heard as noise in analog phone sets, and you'd also like to isolate the POTS phones when the go off-hook and change the loading characteristics on the line. Note that if someone did L2TP over raw ethernet, it would be more or less equivilent; it's just that when we had the need, L2TP over IP wasn't even done yet (and still isn't, really) much less trying to extend it. louie (one of the authors of the PPPoE protocol/RFC) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 3 13:32:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from fever.semiotek.com (H253.C225.tor.velocet.net [209.167.225.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1B014D85 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:32:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jread@fever.semiotek.com) Received: (from jread@localhost) by fever.semiotek.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id QAA18930 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:31:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jread) Message-ID: <19990803163157.C17569@semiotek.com> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:31:57 -0400 From: Justin Wells To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: how to configure FreeBSD for unreliable network Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have a FreeBSD 3.2 box sitting on a network that has a reasonably fast connection to the outside world. Linux boxes on this network get 30-40k/sec, but my FreeBSD box gets less than 1k/sec on the same link. The link has fairly good bandwidth (2-3 Mbit) but horrible reliability (sometimes up to 20-30% packet loss). Basically it's an ADSL link operating a little too far away from the CO, so the cable length is longer than the spec says it should be--the consequence being a fast, but not very reliable link. Nevertheless, FreeBSD gets 1k/sec whereas Linux gets 30-40k/sec. (Actually, only recent Linux kernels perform well, older ones suffer the same way that FreeBSD does, making me think it's a tcp stack issue.) It seems that what's happening is that there's a long retry in FreeBSD, and a nearly instantaneous one in Linux. So while FreeBSD stops and waits for nearly a full second before retrying, Linux recovers and resumes. This is just my theory and may be full of BS. I don't really totally know what's going on--I do know that I can start a huge number of these 1k/sec transfers without slowing any of them down any further, so the bandwidth is obviously there. At any rate--what can I do to configure my FreeBSD boxes to work well across this lousy link? It's embarassing that Linux is showing better network performance ;-) Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 3 17:37:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from greenwood3.nerv.nu (cx639627-c.irvn1.occa.home.com [24.0.209.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE06A14C0A; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:37:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nugundam@greenwood3.nerv.nu) Received: from localhost (nugundam@localhost) by greenwood3.nerv.nu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA13937; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:36:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nugundam@greenwood3.nerv.nu) Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:36:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Joseph Lee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: routing question Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I'm having difficulting with routing which searching the mailing lists and reading the man page have not helped. My fbsd machine (A) is on the same physical segment behind a hub with 2 other machines (B,C). Machines A/B/C each have a real IP, but the IPs are not on the same subnet (due to stupid cable modem IP distribution). I've gotten B/C to see each other directly with the route command in DOS, but I haven't been able to get an equivalent route add command working for FreeBSD. I would like to know where I'm getting it wrong. I've tried: (1) route add -host -interface de0 (1) gives me: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire gw 0:40:5:43:34:24 UHLW 0 7937 lo0 0:40:5:43:34:24 UHLS 0 0 de0 Shouldn't the ethernet address for the gateway to B be B's, not gw's? (2) route add -host -interface (2) gives me: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire gw 0:40:5:43:34:24 UHLW 0 7937 lo0 gw UHS 0 0 de0 and a /kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway value (3) route add -host (3) gives: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire gw 0:40:5:43:34:24 UHLW 0 7937 lo0 gw UGHS 0 0 de0 traceroute to (), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 gw () 1.762 ms 0.812 ms 0.769 ms 2 gw () 1.379 ms 1.340 ms 1.315 ms (4) route add -host -netmask 255.255.255.255 (4) gives: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire gw 0:40:5:43:34:24 UHLW 0 7937 lo0 gw UGSc 0 0 de0 This gives the same traceroute as (3). The only way I've been able to see B from A (or C from A) is to set the netmask on A's de0 to 255.254.0.0 and broadcast to so that I get a routing table of: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire 24/15 link#1 UC 0 0 de0 gw 0:40:5:43:34:24 UHLW 0 7937 lo0 0:0:c0:8c:8b:93 UHLW 0 2 de0 1183 This allows A to see B/C fine, but messes things up if A needs to route to other machines on the 24/15 subnet which aren't directly connected. What is the correct route command? Thanks for any help, -- Joseph nugundam =best=com==/==\=IIGS=/==\=Playstation=/==\=Civic HX CVT=/==\ # Anime Expo 1999 >> www.anime-expo.org/ > # FreeBSD: The Power to Serve >> www.freebsd.org > # EX: The Online World of Anime & Manga >> www.ex.org/ / To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 4 1:40:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from tower.portal2.com (tower.portal2.com [202.77.223.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7261E15344 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 01:40:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kent@graffiti.net) Received: (qmail 91909 invoked by uid 27197); 4 Aug 1999 08:38:44 -0000 Message-ID: <19990804083844.91908.qmail@graffiti.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.117) From: "Kent Ho" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 16:38:44 +0800 Subject: Forwarding ip packets with ipfw. Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I have recently moved one of our webserver from my network to an ISP data center assigned with a new IP address. The problem is that lot of machines out there still trying to find the webserver at the old IP. So I have setup on one of my pc's in my network and aliased the old IP. Now I need help to setup ipfw to forward web connections to the old IP to the new IP. So far I have recompiled the kernel and enabled firewalling, ip forwarding and updated the startup scripts. I have tried many combination of the ipfw. An example of what i'm trying to do: ipfw add fwd xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx,xx ip from any to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx in recv fxp0 please help. many thanks Kent. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 4 3:23:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.128.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D491E14FF1 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 03:23:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA70299; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:23:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA02519; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:24:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199908041024.LAA02519@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: kit Cc: Brian Somers , jonathan michaels , Brian Somers , Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Aug 1999 22:45:26 EDT." <37A89856.9C819AA8@xtra.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 11:24:47 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org a.bob@xtra.co.nz said: > On a sort of related topic what would be required to run RFC 2365 PPP > over AAL5. Would it be easier/ harder than over UDP / Ethernet? How > would natm and user ppp fit? And where would one look to find out > what is required? Anything that requires device-specific link negotiation isn't easy to implement at the moment - that's the idea behind changing the ``set dial'' stuff so that it's ``chat'' capabilities are abstracted at the device level. This is what's really missing at the moment. It'll have to be written for PPPoE, and the isdn patches I have (not yet committed) would benefit from such changes. I don't think natd fits into any of this - it just mangles packets via divert sockets - it doesn't control the traffic in any other way. The only place to find out more about this is in ppp/datalink.c - specifically the DATALINK_DIAL state code that currently passes off responsibility to the chat state machine. It needs to use a more generic state machine from which the chat state machine will be derived at the ``struct physical'' level for ttys, a i4bchat state machine sould do the RBCH_DIALOUT stuff for ISDN devices, and an EthernetChat derivation could be written for PPPoE. -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 4 12:33:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from ns.uninet.ee (ns.uninet.ee [194.204.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6284715403; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 12:32:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from henri@inspiral.net) Received: from iral (iral.inspiral.net [194.204.49.250]) by ns.uninet.ee (8.8.8/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA12534; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 22:31:10 +0300 (EEST) Message-Id: <199908041931.WAA12534@ns.uninet.ee> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Henri Laupmaa" Organization: Inspiral Network To: freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 22:31:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: booting from CD Cc: freebsd-questions@freefall.FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.53EE/R1) Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Has anyone tried to burn an installation to CD to run as read-only op system from a machine with CD as only storage device ... What about running X & Netscape on top of that? Suggestions anyone? Regards, Henri Laupmaa Inspiral Network henri@inspiral.net +372 55 24542 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 4 12:39:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3035A15418; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 12:39:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA07053; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 12:33:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199908041933.MAA07053@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Henri Laupmaa" Cc: freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@freefall.FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: booting from CD In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Aug 1999 22:31:07 +0200." <199908041931.WAA12534@ns.uninet.ee> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 12:33:22 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Has anyone tried to burn an installation to CD to > run as read-only op system from a machine with CD > as only storage device ... > > What about running X & Netscape on top of that? > > Suggestions anyone? See the "FreeBSD Express" CD in the new toolkit. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 4 15:32:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C0614E24; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:32:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA77104; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:28:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Kent Ho Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Forwarding ip packets with ipfw. In-Reply-To: <19990804083844.91908.qmail@graffiti.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org you probably want to use natd to do this rather than ipfw fwd.. ipfw fwd does not change the packet, but, rather, just delivers the unaltered packet somewhere. (This can be useful, but not for what you want to do). Now, if the web server was running FreeBSD you might be able to do it, but otherwise you need to actually change the packets so that they reflect the new target. Natd can actually do this I believe. (it also uses IPFW so you haven't wasted the effort you have done so far.) julian On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Kent Ho wrote: > Hi, > > I have recently moved one of our webserver from my network to an ISP > data center assigned with a new IP address. > > The problem is that lot of machines out there still trying to find the > webserver at the old IP. So I have setup on one of my pc's in my > network and aliased the old IP. Now I need help to setup ipfw to > forward web connections to the old IP to the new IP. > > So far I have recompiled the kernel and enabled firewalling, ip > forwarding and updated the startup scripts. > > I have tried many combination of the ipfw. An example of what i'm > trying to do: > > ipfw add fwd xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx,xx ip from any to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx in recv > fxp0 > > please help. > > many thanks > > Kent. > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 4 23:13:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from pegleg.ecst.csuchico.edu (pegleg.ecst.csuchico.edu [132.241.5.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F74814DF8 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 23:13:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from amarks@ecst.csuchico.edu) Received: (qmail 17237 invoked by uid 20393); 4 Aug 1999 23:13:12 -0700 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 23:13:12 -0700 (PDT) From: "Adam D. Marks" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: routing Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am not to familiar with using freebsd to route packets. I am interested in any information or sources of information on setting up a freebsd box to route 5 ip addresses through an adsl connecting. We are currently sharing 1 ip through a linux box. I am not on the -net mailing list yet so please make sure that responses get directed to my personal address and not just the -net mailing list. Thank you very much, Adam To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 5 1: 7: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from gw.caamora.com.au (jonath5.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.41.237]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFB5150A4 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 01:06:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jon@gw.caamora.com.au) Received: (from jon@localhost) by gw.caamora.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA15698; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 18:04:16 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jon) Message-ID: <19990805180415.G13504@caamora.com.au> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 18:04:15 +1000 From: jonathan michaels To: "Louis A. Mamakos" Cc: Brian Somers , Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) Mail-Followup-To: "Louis A. Mamakos" , Brian Somers , Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <199908031321.OAA07776@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> <199908031345.JAA09965@whizzo.transsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199908031345.JAA09965@whizzo.transsys.com>; from Louis A. Mamakos on Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 09:45:17AM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD gw.caamora.com.au 2.2.7-RELEASE i386 X-Mood: i'm alive, if it counts Organisation: Caamora, PO Box 144, Rosebery NSW 1445 Australia Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 09:45:17AM -0400, Louis A. Mamakos wrote: > > > Personally, I prefer the idea of having something like PPPoUDP > > instead. This would provide all the same facilities, be very easy to > > implement (user-ppp can do it already!) and would be routable, all > > for a very small encapsulation overhead. > > This already exists; it's called L2TP. > > One of the desires for PPPoE was that an ISP could install a *DSL > connection to a customer, and use Ethernet as the medium between the > DSL "modem" CPE device and your PC(s). Using something like L2TP > would require that the DSL "modem" device either: brian, louis, et al thank you all fro the descriptions and gneral information regarding this issue. i've got lots of source to trace down. warm regards and much apreciations. cheers, jonathan -- =============================================================================== Jonathan Michaels PO Box 144, Rosebery, NSW 1445 Australia =========================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 5 1:16:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from gw.caamora.com.au (jonath5.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.41.237]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FBF1508C for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 01:16:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jon@gw.caamora.com.au) Received: (from jon@localhost) by gw.caamora.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA15720; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 18:16:09 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jon) Message-ID: <19990805181609.H13504@caamora.com.au> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 18:16:09 +1000 From: jonathan michaels To: Brian Somers , kit Cc: Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) Mail-Followup-To: Brian Somers , kit , Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <37A89856.9C819AA8@xtra.co.nz> <199908041024.LAA02519@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199908041024.LAA02519@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org>; from Brian Somers on Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 11:24:47AM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD gw.caamora.com.au 2.2.7-RELEASE i386 X-Mood: i'm alive, if it counts Organisation: Caamora, PO Box 144, Rosebery NSW 1445 Australia Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 11:24:47AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > a.bob@xtra.co.nz said: > > On a sort of related topic what would be required to run RFC 2365 PPP > > over AAL5. Would it be easier/ harder than over UDP / Ethernet? How > > would natm and user ppp fit? And where would one look to find out > > what is required? > > Anything that requires device-specific link negotiation isn't easy to > implement at the moment - that's the idea behind changing the ``set > dial'' stuff so that it's ``chat'' capabilities are abstracted at the > device level. This is what's really missing at the moment. to take a right turn at the gate and because of some interestng developments ... can any of what we have been discussing be applied to frame relay. i've been reading up on isdn and frame relay. here in australia (my part ok) frame relay is significanly cheaper than isdn services and from what the telco techies tell me the implementation is far more reliable (dropout rates and overal link stability and throughput). is it possible to run frame relay over a freebsd based hardware mix (computer+serial card+modem+ppp). sorry, if i got it all base over apex i still find some (most) of this networking a triffle confusing. warm regards jonathan ps, how is, where does frame relay sit in relation to ppp and this pppoe that is being discussed, please ? -- =============================================================================== Jonathan Michaels PO Box 144, Rosebery, NSW 1445 Australia =========================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 5 3: 2:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from web113.yahoomail.com (web113.yahoomail.com [205.180.60.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65890154A3 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 03:02:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vesselin_m@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <19990805100133.19562.rocketmail@web113.yahoomail.com> Received: from [195.230.9.133] by web113.yahoomail.com; Thu, 05 Aug 1999 03:01:33 PDT Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 03:01:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Vesselin Markov Subject: Fwd: connect ppp To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1804289383-933847293=:19438" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --0-1804289383-933847293=:19438 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Note: forwarded message attached. _____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com --0-1804289383-933847293=:19438 Content-Type: message/rfc822 X-Apparently-To: vesselin_m@yahoo.com via mdd103.yahoomail.com Received: from web113.yahoomail.com (205.180.60.84) by mta116.yahoomail.com with SMTP; 5 Aug 1999 03:01:33 -0700 Message-ID: <19990805095306.19132.rocketmail@web113.yahoomail.com> Received: from [195.230.9.133] by web113.yahoomail.com; Thu, 05 Aug 1999 02:53:06 PDT Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 02:53:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Vesselin Markov Subject: connect ppp To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: vesselin_m@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Length: 776 Hi, i am running a 3.1 fbsd box.I have some problems with ppp connection and video card(i740 8mb). First when i connect with minicom the modem drops on the 'handshake' ,maybe some wrong init string or i havent't compiled ppp support in the kernel?What other way i can connect with pppd script?Can you help with that? Second my video card-it's intel 740 8 mb ram agp ... and i can't choose the right x server to set.I tryied to run the linux binary but it was not supported.I tryied to make it a fbsd binary but i couldn't do that. After the irc and news groups you are the last i ask for help.Please do something;). Regards, Vesselin _____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com --0-1804289383-933847293=:19438-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 5 4:14:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.128.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0585715160 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 04:14:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA96146; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 12:14:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA01934; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 12:15:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199908051115.MAA01934@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: jonathan michaels Cc: Brian Somers , kit , Robert Watson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Aug 1999 18:16:09 +1000." <19990805181609.H13504@caamora.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 12:15:44 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org jon@caamora.com.au said: > ps, how is, where does frame relay sit in relation to ppp and this > pppoe that is being discussed, please ? I don't know anything about frame relay I'm afraid... If it's done through a sync card, I've been working on sync card support but haven't yet had much luck.... it's actually top of my list when I'm at home (but I can't develop that on the train where I do most of my development these days). -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 5 11: 5:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay2.yahoo.com (mail-relay2.yahoo.com [206.251.17.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE92614D2A for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 11:05:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jayanth@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from borogove.yahoo.com (borogove.yahoo.com [205.216.162.65]) by mail-relay2.yahoo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA29372 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 11:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yahoo-inc.com (milk.yahoo.com [206.132.89.117]) by borogove.yahoo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05937 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 11:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <37A9D248.A118340E@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 11:04:56 -0700 From: jayanth X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: memory leak in the routing table ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Were there any issues related to a memory leak in the routing table ? I am running freebsd-stable. After a few days vmstat -m shows the memory used by routing table to be very high and log messages "arpresolve: cant allocate llinfo for a.b.c.d" "arplookup a.b.c.d failed could not allocate llinfo" , keep repeating for every ip address that requires an arp entry to be created. I turned on "route -v monitor" and started getting the following messages "RTM_MISS: Lookup failed on this address" for most addresses. "netstat -arn" revealed routes that had a refcnt 0 zero but were not being freed. However, I think the UP flag was on for each of the routes. The machine was rebooted. It seems there is a memory leak in the routing table. Any input would be greatly appreciated. thanks jayanth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 5 14: 5:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC12114D9E for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 14:05:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA05706; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 14:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908052102.OAA05706@implode.root.com> To: jayanth Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: memory leak in the routing table ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Aug 1999 11:04:56 PDT." <37A9D248.A118340E@yahoo-inc.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 14:02:36 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Were there any issues related to a memory leak in the routing table ? >I am running freebsd-stable. >After a few days vmstat -m shows the memory used by routing table to be >very high and log messages "arpresolve: cant allocate llinfo for >a.b.c.d" >"arplookup a.b.c.d failed could not allocate llinfo" , keep repeating >for >every ip address that requires an arp entry to be created. This is caused by a screwup in your network configuration, probably the netmask, such that the kernel hears the ARP broadcast from a peer, but doesn't know how to respond since it doesn't think that the requestor's IP address is reachable. >I turned on "route -v monitor" and started getting the following >messages >"RTM_MISS: Lookup failed on this address" for most addresses. See above. >"netstat -arn" revealed routes that had a refcnt 0 zero but were not >being freed. However, I think the UP flag was on for each of the routes. No, zero refcnt routes are just clone routes that haven't aged out of the route cache yet. This does not indicate a route leak. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 5 15:36:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from shell6.ba.best.com (shell6.ba.best.com [206.184.139.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEDF14DB1 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 15:36:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkb@shell6.ba.best.com) Received: (from jkb@localhost) by shell6.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.sh) id PAA15263; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 15:03:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19990805150353.A14009@best.com> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 15:03:53 -0700 From: "Jan B. Koum " To: dg@root.com, jayanth Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: memory leak in the routing table ? References: <37A9D248.A118340E@yahoo-inc.com> <199908052102.OAA05706@implode.root.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199908052102.OAA05706@implode.root.com>; from David Greenman on Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 02:02:36PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 02:02:36PM -0700, David Greenman wrote: > >Were there any issues related to a memory leak in the routing table ? > >I am running freebsd-stable. > >After a few days vmstat -m shows the memory used by routing table to be > >very high and log messages "arpresolve: cant allocate llinfo for > >a.b.c.d" > >"arplookup a.b.c.d failed could not allocate llinfo" , keep repeating > >for > >every ip address that requires an arp entry to be created. > > This is caused by a screwup in your network configuration, probably the > netmask, such that the kernel hears the ARP broadcast from a peer, but doesn't > know how to respond since it doesn't think that the requestor's IP address is > reachable. The netmask looks ok. The machine is on a /23 img4% ifconfig -a fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 204.71.200.244 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 204.71.201.255 ether 00:a0:c9:fb:47:d5 media: 100baseTX status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP lo0: flags=8008 mtu 16384 Nobody chagned start_if.fxp0 for a while also: img4% ls -l start_if.fxp0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 130 Mar 1 08:38 start_if.fxp0 However, looking at the above I notice there is no IP given to lo0. I'll go ifconfig lo0 -- I wonder if somehow that is the problem? -- yan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 5 16:20:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65300155DC for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 16:18:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA06131; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 16:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908052315.QAA06131@implode.root.com> To: "Jan B. Koum " Cc: jayanth , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: memory leak in the routing table ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Aug 1999 15:03:53 PDT." <19990805150353.A14009@best.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 16:15:54 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 02:02:36PM -0700, David Greenman wrote: >> >Were there any issues related to a memory leak in the routing table ? >> >I am running freebsd-stable. >> >After a few days vmstat -m shows the memory used by routing table to be >> >very high and log messages "arpresolve: cant allocate llinfo for >> >a.b.c.d" >> >"arplookup a.b.c.d failed could not allocate llinfo" , keep repeating >> >for >> >every ip address that requires an arp entry to be created. >> >> This is caused by a screwup in your network configuration, probably the >> netmask, such that the kernel hears the ARP broadcast from a peer, but doesn't >> know how to respond since it doesn't think that the requestor's IP address is >> reachable. > > The netmask looks ok. The machine is on a /23 > >img4% ifconfig -a >fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 204.71.200.244 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 204.71.201.255 > ether 00:a0:c9:fb:47:d5 > media: 100baseTX status: active > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP >lo0: flags=8008 mtu 16384 In the above mentioned arplookup failure, what is the IP address that is reported? -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 5 16:45:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.az.home.com (ha1.rdc1.az.home.com [24.1.240.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B669A14D2E; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 16:45:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from elgreen@iname.com) Received: from ehome.local.net ([24.9.114.169]) by mail.rdc1.az.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP id <19990805234554.QPVT27077.mail.rdc1.az.home.com@ehome.local.net>; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 16:45:54 -0700 From: Eric Lee Green Organization: Myself @ Home To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: More on receiver lockups Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 16:35:33 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21] Content-Type: text/plain References: <99080507521800.04193@ehome.local.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <99080516455900.04842@ehome.local.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I posted a bug report to GNATS recently about receiver lockup problems that I was having with the vr0 driver (Via Rhine). After a while packets get out, but they can't get in :-(. Today I swapped it out with a cheapo RTL card (rl0 driver). I have the same problem :-(. Thus it does not seem likely that it is a problem with the vr0 driver, but is, rather, a problem somewhere else :-(. So I'm looking for suggestions about the best thing to do next. The machine is an eMachines etower|300k. I'm wondering if it's something to do with the Apollo MVP3 PCI-PCI bridge, which is a known piece of junk... dmesg reports (in part): chip0: rev 0x04 on pci0.0.0 chip1: rev 0x00 on pci0.1.0 chip2: rev 0x06 on pci0.7.0 ide_pci0: rev 0x06 on pci0.7.1 chip3: rev 0x00 on pci0.7.3 rl0: rev 0x10 int a irq 11 on pci0.19.0 rl0: Ethernet address: 00:40:c7:77:12:bc rl0: autoneg complete, link status good (half-duplex, 10Mbps) Probing for devices on PCI bus 1: vga0: rev 0x7a on pci1.0.0 Probing for PnP devices: CSN 1 Vendor ID: CSC4236 [0x3642630e] Serial 0xffffffff Comp ID: @@@0000 [0x0000 0000] mss_attach 1 at 0x530 irq 5 dma 1:3 flags 0x13 pcm1 (CS423x/Yamaha/AD1816 sn 0xffffffff) at 0x530-0x537 irq 5 drq 1 fl ags 0x13 on isa Probing for devices on the ISA bus: sc0 on isa sc0: VGA color <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> atkbdc0 at 0x60-0x6f on motherboard atkbd0 irq 1 on isa psm0 irq 12 on isa psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa sio0: type 16550A sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1 not found at 0x2f8 pcm0 not probed due to drq conflict with pcm1 at 1 fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 flags 0xb0ff on isa wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): , LBA, DMA, 32-bit, multi-block-16 wd0: 6149MB (12594960 sectors), 784 cyls, 255 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S wdc1 at 0x170-0x177 irq 15 flags 0xb0ff on isa wdc1: unit 0 (atapi): , removable, intr, dma, iord y acd0: drive speed 687 - 5507KB/sec, 512KB cache acd0: supported read types: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA, packet track acd0: Audio: play, 255 volume levels acd0: Mechanism: ejectable tray acd0: Medium: no/blank disc inside, unlocked ppc0 at 0x378 irq 7 flags 0x40 on isa ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode lpt0: on ppbus 0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus 0 plip0: on ppbus 0 lpt0: on ppbus 0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port vga0 at 0x3b0-0x3df maddr 0xa0000 msize 131072 on isa npx0 on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface -- Eric Lee Green http://members.tripod.com/e_l_green mail: e_l_green@hotmail.com ^^^^^^^ Burdening Microsoft with SPAM! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Aug 6 9:16:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from wolfenet.com (ratty.wolfe.net [204.157.98.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FEB14C31 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 09:16:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jimbon@wolfenet.com) Received: from traveller (sea-adsl10-78.wolfenet.com [206.159.10.78]) by wolfenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA27521 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 09:16:34 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Bonner" To: Subject: Netowrk and ADSL Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 09:16:31 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01BEDFEC.5F1DFFB0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01BEDFEC.5F1DFFB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am currently using release 2.2.6, and I am new to the FreeBSD world. I am trying to setup my Network for ADSL. I have a NIC installed in my machine, but I need to set it up for a dynamic IP without "Dialing up". Hardware as follows, NIC to hub, hub to DSL modem (always live). Can anyone help? I will need very clear instructions, as I said, I'm new to this... Thanks in advance for any help I get! Jim Bonner ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01BEDFEC.5F1DFFB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am = currently using=20 release 2.2.6, and I am new to the FreeBSD world. I am trying to setup = my=20 Network for ADSL. I have a NIC installed in my machine, but I need to = set it up=20 for a dynamic IP without "Dialing up". Hardware as follows, NIC to hub, = hub to=20 DSL modem (always live).
 
Can = anyone help? I=20 will need very clear instructions, as I said, I'm new to=20 this...
 
Thanks = in advance=20 for any help I get!
 
Jim=20 Bonner
------=_NextPart_000_000C_01BEDFEC.5F1DFFB0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Aug 6 20:58:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.az.home.com (ha1.rdc1.az.home.com [24.1.240.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859F914C9E; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 20:57:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from elgreen@iname.com) Received: from ehome.local.net ([24.9.114.169]) by mail.rdc1.az.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP id <19990807035742.YYQJ27077.mail.rdc1.az.home.com@ehome.local.net>; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 20:57:42 -0700 From: Eric Lee Green Organization: Myself @ Home To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More on receiver lockups Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 20:55:43 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21] Content-Type: text/plain References: <99080516455900.04842@ehome.local.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <99080620575900.73927@ehome.local.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 05 Aug 1999, Eric Lee Green wrote: > I posted a bug report to GNATS recently about receiver lockup problems that I > was having with the vr0 driver (Via Rhine). After a while packets get > out, but they can't get in :-(. Today I swapped it out with a cheapo RTL card > (rl0 driver). I have the same problem :-(. Thus it does not seem likely that it > is a problem with the vr0 driver, but is, rather, a problem somewhere else :-(. > > So I'm looking for suggestions about the best thing to do next. Well, I cvsup'ed "stable" (just the kernel) and re-compiled the kernel, and everything seems to be going hunky-dory. There were no changes in the vr0 driver (didn't check the rl0 driver), anybody have any idea what the problem was and what fixed it? Was it maybe the buggy Via PCI bridge? -- Eric Lee Green http://members.tripod.com/e_l_green mail: e_l_green@hotmail.com ^^^^^^^ Burdening Microsoft with SPAM! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Aug 7 4:13:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mails.ipri.kiev.ua (mails.ipri.kiev.ua [195.5.13.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2135E14C30; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 04:13:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnut@cki.ipri.kiev.ua) Received: from cki.ipri.kiev.ua (cki.ipri.kiev.ua [195.5.13.68]) by mails.ipri.kiev.ua (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA22864; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 14:15:50 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 14:15:50 +0300 (EET DST) From: Oles Hnatkevych To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: IP-in-IP encapsulation Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello! Urgently needed information on how to implement and use IP in IP encapsulation with FreeBSD-3.2. Is it possible to make with native stuff like ipfw/nat/smth.else or some additional software has to be used? Sorry if the lists are not apropriate. Thank you very much in advance! Bye To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Aug 7 10:47: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from bubba.whistle.com (bubba.whistle.com [207.76.205.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF2D14E16 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id KAA84444; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 10:44:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199908071744.KAA84444@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: "Invitation to participate in PPPoE Trial" (fwd) In-Reply-To: <19990805181609.H13504@caamora.com.au> from jonathan michaels at "Aug 5, 1999 06:16:09 pm" To: jon@caamora.com.au (jonathan michaels) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 10:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Cc: brian@FreeBSD.org.uk (Brian Somers), a.bob@xtra.co.nz (kit), robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org (Robert Watson), freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org jonathan michaels writes: > can any of what we have been discussing be applied to frame > relay. i've been reading up on isdn and frame relay. here in > australia (my part ok) frame relay is significanly cheaper than > isdn services and from what the telco techies tell me the > implementation is far more reliable (dropout rates and overal > link stability and throughput). > > is it possible to run frame relay over a freebsd based hardware > mix (computer+serial card+modem+ppp). sorry, if i got it all > base over apex i still find some (most) of this networking a > triffle confusing. Check out netgraph, which includes frame relay support. The patches are probably out of data though. You also must use the mpd port instead of ppp. ftp://ftp.whistle.com/pub/archie/netgraph/index.html -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Aug 7 14:11:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from dt011n65.san.rr.com (dt011n65.san.rr.com [204.210.13.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E861314CFC; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 14:11:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt011n65.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA22266; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 14:10:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <37ACA0E3.7064314B@gorean.org> Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 14:10:59 -0700 From: Doug Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT-0730 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Lee Green Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More on receiver lockups References: <99080516455900.04842@ehome.local.net> <99080620575900.73927@ehome.local.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Eric Lee Green wrote: > Well, I cvsup'ed "stable" (just the kernel) I'm glad it worked for you this time, but I can't let this pass without a warning. It's a very bad idea to upgrade your source then build just the kernel. You should always make world first to avoid possible incompatabilities between the kernel and your userland programs. More info on the make world process is available on the web site under tutorials. Good luck, Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Aug 7 19: 0:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from online.no (pilt-s.online.no [148.122.208.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B710014CFF for ; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 19:00:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shaun.jurrens@stud.uni-regensburg.de) Received: from dakota.shamz.net (ti01a26-0013.dialup.online.no [130.67.3.141]) by online.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA08330; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 03:59:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from shaun@localhost) by dakota.shamz.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA06969; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 02:46:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from shaun) Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 02:46:26 +0200 From: Shaun Jurrens To: Jim Cassata Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ed0 or ed1? Message-ID: <19990808024626.B372@dakota.shamz.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Jim Cassata on Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 03:14:23PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 03:14:23PM -0400, Jim Cassata wrote: #> this is normal for PCI NE2000s #> #> On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Chris Keladis wrote: #> #> > Hi, #> > #> > I am experiencing some rather odd results with my FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE box. #> > #> > For some reason my PCI RealTek (NE-2000 clone) network card is detecting as ed1 ^^^ Ahh, guys, the ed driver is a isa driver. Confer with the man page [man 4 ed] You should use the rl driver [rl0 in this case] #> > A sample dmesg output: #> > #> > ed1: rev 0x00 int a irq 10 on pci0.11.0 #> > ed1: address 00:00:01:00:a6:f7, type NE2000 (16 bit) #> > Still, I find it interesting that it finds a card on the pci bus... #> > #> > And in the kernel config file, i've specified: #> > #> > device ed0 Should be: device rl0 #> > #> > ---------------------------------- #> > Chris Keladis #> > TPG Internet System Administrator (???-couldn't resist) #> > ---- 1. Don't forget to read (really read on a long xterm) LINT 2. man -k/apropos will help you find more on the driver. 3. man [section]/-a will bring up the page(s) 4. the RealTek card is pretty low budget (I know, I own three) -- Yours truly, Shaun D. Jurrens 0860 Oslo (new) (hopefully soon: shaun@shamz.net) IRCnick: shamz #chillout #unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Aug 7 19:42:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from 60-Hz.Powered-By.AC (226-193.adsl2.avtel.net [207.71.226.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F74114D03 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 19:42:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dburr@Powered-By.AC) Received: from localhost (dburr@localhost) by 60-Hz.Powered-By.AC (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA16740; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 19:41:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dburr@Powered-By.AC) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 19:41:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Donald Burr To: Shaun Jurrens Cc: Jim Cassata , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ed0 or ed1? In-Reply-To: <19990808024626.B372@dakota.shamz.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Erm, not exactly. The ed driver handles both ISA *and* PCI NE2000 clones. The Realtek 8029, for example, is a PCI NE2000 clone that responds to the ed driver: Copyright (c) 1992-1999 FreeBSD Inc. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE #0: Sun Aug 1 20:45:02 PDT 1999 dburr@60-Hz.Powered-By.AC:/usr/src/sys/compile/60-HZ Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Cyrix 6x86MX (187.93-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "CyrixInstead" Id = 0x600 Stepping = 0 DIR=0x0752 Features=0x80a135 [...] ed0: rev 0x00 int a irq 5 on pci0.11.0 ed0: address 00:20:18:57:eb:e7, type NE2000 (16 bit) Donald Burr WEB: http://www.Powered-By.AC/ PO Box 91212, Santa Barbara, CA 93190-1212 Tel:(805)957-9666 FAX:(800)492-5954 Member and software developer with The FreBSD Project - http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ *** FreeBSD *** A FREE, 32 Bit UNIX OS for PC's -- The Power to Serve! On Sun, 8 Aug 1999, Shaun Jurrens wrote: > #> > For some reason my PCI RealTek (NE-2000 clone) network card is detecting as ed1 > ^^^ Ahh, guys, the ed driver is a isa driver. Confer > with the man page [man 4 ed] You should use the rl driver [rl0 in this case] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message