From owner-freebsd-net Mon Sep 27 6:24:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from ferao.jungle.bt.co.uk (ferao.jungle.bt.co.uk [132.146.107.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495E615106 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 06:24:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ispyropo@jungle.bt.co.uk) Received: from jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.112.89]) by ferao.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/Jungle-8.9.1-03) with ESMTP id OAA06196 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:20:12 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <37EF7159.4B44175D@jungle.bt.co.uk> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:30:01 +0100 From: Homer at BT Labs Organization: Adastral Park X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: About Cyclom-Ye SM8 Board on FreeBSD3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello! My name is Yiannis Spyropoulos and I 'm working at BT Labs, Martlesham Heath England. Part of my present project is to use a Cyclom-Ye SM8 Serial Ports Board on a FreeBSD3.2 machine. To do so, I found out at the LINT configuration file that FreeBSD 3.2 supports this kind of board by enabling the 'device cy0' line and creating the devices ttyc0 and cuac0 under the /dev directory. However, after compiling and installing the new kernel, I rebooted the machine, only to discover that the booting sequence stalled after the hardware probing. Do you know if it is a drivers' bug, or it is something I'm doing wrong? I would appreciate your help very much, Yiannis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Sep 27 8:18: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from entic.net (shell.entic.net [209.157.122.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8751A152F5 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 08:17:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aj@entic.net) Received: (qmail 27890 invoked by uid 1000); 27 Sep 1999 15:17:24 -0000 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 08:17:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Anil Jangity To: Homer at BT Labs Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About Cyclom-Ye SM8 Board on FreeBSD3.2 In-Reply-To: <37EF7159.4B44175D@jungle.bt.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I don't think that model is a PnP so you have to pass some additional information to the kernel instead of just saying "device cy0". Take a look at the documentation that comes with the driver. You can grab the latest FreeBSD3.x driver from: ftp://ftp.cyclades.com/pub/cyclades/cyclom-y/freebsd/ There is no dir for 3.2 but the 3.0 version SHOULD work also. On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Homer at BT Labs wrote: |Hello! | My name is Yiannis Spyropoulos and I 'm working at BT Labs, Martlesham |Heath |England. Part of my present project is to use a Cyclom-Ye SM8 Serial |Ports Board |on a FreeBSD3.2 machine. To do so, I found out at the LINT |configuration file that |FreeBSD 3.2 supports this kind of board by enabling the 'device cy0' |line and creating the devices ttyc0 and cuac0 under the /dev directory. |However, after compiling and installing the new kernel, I rebooted the |machine, only to discover that the booting sequence stalled after the |hardware probing. Do you know if it is a drivers' bug, or it is |something I'm doing wrong? |I would appreciate your help very much, | |Yiannis | | | |To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org |with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message | Kind regards, Anil Jangity aj@entic.net Network Operations & Customer Service http://www.entic.net "Work like you don't need money, love like you've never been hurt, and dance like no one's watching." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Sep 29 9:16: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from issrv01.co.shasta.ca.us (209-76-70-20.co.shasta.ca.us [209.76.70.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BB2C158DD for ; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 09:15:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2983 ([192.168.21.75]) by issrv01.co.shasta.ca.us; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 09:13:49 -0700 Message-ID: <000a01bf0a95$ccb03c90$4b15a8c0@co.shasta.ca.us> From: "Derek Jewett" To: Subject: ftpd - connection refused Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 09:15:08 -0700 Organization: Shasta County MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01BF0A5B.20313260" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01BF0A5B.20313260 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Help! Using 3.1-R My users get a connection refused when users attempt to log into my ftp = server.. I have checked the inetd, all looks ok.. I am even running ftpd = as it's own process using /usr/libexec/ftpd -D -l, and I still get = connection refused.. Help!! something is hosed I know it! Thanks ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01BF0A5B.20313260 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Help! Using 3.1-R
 
My users get a connection refused when = users=20 attempt to log into my ftp server.. I have checked the inetd, all looks = ok.. I=20 am even running ftpd as it's own process using /usr/libexec/ftpd -D -l, = and I=20 still get connection refused.. Help!! something is hosed I know it!=20 Thanks
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01BF0A5B.20313260-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Sep 29 11:17:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id A043B15973; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919301CD483 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:16:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:16:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD version of Dante (Socks proxy) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi guys, One of the dante guys has just released a version which should work properly on FreeBSD (previous versions had problems with DNS resolution). Dante (www.inet.no/dante) is a BSD-licensed SOCKS4/5/Microsoft Proxy server similar to the (license-restricted) NEC SOCKS reference implementation. I've been pestering them off and on for FreeBSD support, so I'm glad someone has finally taken it up. Unfortunately, I can't test this myself right now, so if anyone else can it would be a good thing so they don't lose momentum. If anyone is interested, the code is available at ftp://ftp.inet.no:/pub/socks/private/dante-1.1.0.tar.gz for testing. Feedback should be sent to the author, Karl-Andre' Skevik or to the dante-misc@inet.no mailing list (and I'd be interested too :). Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Sep 29 11:28:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from entic.net (shell.entic.net [209.157.122.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8899015955 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:28:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aj@entic.net) Received: (qmail 14266 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Sep 1999 18:27:47 -0000 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:27:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Anil Jangity To: Derek Jewett Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftpd - connection refused In-Reply-To: <000a01bf0a95$ccb03c90$4b15a8c0@co.shasta.ca.us> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org First of all you should be running the stable version if you have real users using your services.... Do you have a fireawall blocking traffic to that port? Add some logging and see if you find anything. Do: netstat -an | grep LISTEN | grep \*.21 and see if your server is listening on that port. ... On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Derek Jewett wrote: |Help! Using 3.1-R | |My users get a connection refused when users attempt to log into my ftp |server.. I have checked the inetd, all looks ok.. I am even running ftpd |as it's own process using /usr/libexec/ftpd -D -l, and I still get |connection refused.. Help!! something is hosed I know it! Thanks | Kind regards, Anil Jangity aj@entic.net "Work like you don't need money, love like you've never been hurt, and dance like no one's watching." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Sep 29 12:21: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from monsoon.mail.pipex.net (monsoon.mail.pipex.net [158.43.128.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F1E41595A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 12:20:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mik.thwaite@dial.pipex.com) Received: (qmail 26922 invoked from network); 29 Sep 1999 19:19:59 -0000 Received: from userk962.uk.uudial.com (HELO mik) (193.149.73.30) by smtp.dial.pipex.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 1999 19:19:59 -0000 Message-ID: <003301bf0af2$1d1bfc80$4a741cac@SUNDERLAND> From: "Mik Thwaite" To: Subject: Installing two NICs Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 20:15:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0030_01BF0AB7.6DDA9E00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0030_01BF0AB7.6DDA9E00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have an two old 486 based machines, two ethernet cards and am trying = to build a router/gateway. Both the NICs are 3Com 3C509 Etherlink III cards. One, the newer one works fine with FreeBSD, recognised etc and happily = runs away with no help. The other - 3Com Etherlink III 3C509 Assy 8362-11 Rev B does not work at = all with FBSD but is OK with Win95. Is the older card simply not supported? It uses a transciever LANart = Model ETT1101 Dip 123 are up 4 is down (default setting) would this be a = problem? If I can't use the older card can I install a second NIC the same as the = newer one and have FBSD recognise the second card imediately as ed1? If = not am I better off going for a second NIC from a different manufacturer = and using a different driver? Thanks in advance, Mik ------=_NextPart_000_0030_01BF0AB7.6DDA9E00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have an two old 486 based machines, = two ethernet=20 cards and am trying to build a router/gateway.
 
Both the NICs are 3Com 3C509 Etherlink = III=20 cards.
 
One, the newer one works fine with = FreeBSD,=20 recognised etc and happily runs away with no help.
 
The other - 3Com Etherlink III 3C509 = Assy 8362-11=20 Rev B does not work at all with FBSD but is OK with Win95.
 
Is the older card simply not supported? = It uses a=20 transciever LANart Model ETT1101 Dip 123 are up 4 is down (default = setting)=20 would this be a problem?
 
If I can't use the older card can I = install a=20 second NIC the same as the newer one and have FBSD recognise the second = card=20 imediately as ed1?  If not am I better off going for a second NIC = from a=20 different manufacturer and using a different driver?
 
Thanks in advance,
 
Mik
------=_NextPart_000_0030_01BF0AB7.6DDA9E00-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Sep 29 13: 7:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F196715955 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 13:06:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id NAA04648; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 13:43:43 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199909291243.NAA04648@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: large window performance... To: net@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 13:43:43 +0100 (MET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1404 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org not sure if this is a known feature, but a few times i have heard of alleged problems with TCP and large windows. While working on PGM i had a siilar problem -- apparently i could not make use of the whole socket buffer until i moved kern.ipc.maxsockbufsize from 256K to some much larger value. After a bit of investigation: kern.ipc.maxsockbufsize limits the amount of buffer space you can have on a socket. in my particular app i was using 530 byte packets, and they were stored in a cluster (2KB), with a rather large waste of space. The 256K limit caused my app to be able to use only 128 buffers (actually less because also MBUFs are accounted). I just wanted to mentionit as this problem might hit other people. This is on a 3.1R system, maybe the thing is fixed in more recent versions of FreeBSD (not sure, there is a sock_waste_factor variable which might be of some help here and maybe is just misused in 3.1R) cheers luigi -----------------------------------+------------------------------------- Luigi RIZZO, luigi@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa TEL/FAX: +39-050-568.533/522 . via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ngc99/ ==== First International Workshop on Networked Group Communication ==== -----------------------------------+------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Sep 30 2: 8:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from jack.see.plym.ac.uk (jack.see.plymouth.ac.uk [141.163.49.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9275E15224 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 02:08:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from b.ghita@jack.see.plym.ac.uk) Received: from sfres1.see.plymouth.ac.uk (sfres1.see.plymouth.ac.uk [141.163.49.101]) by jack.see.plym.ac.uk (NTMail 3.03.0014/4c.agsm) with ESMTP id ca032372 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 10:13:06 +0100 Message-ID: <008b01bf0b24$3ef82040$6531a38d@see.plym.ac.uk> From: "Bogdan Ghita" To: Subject: Quadrant. What is it? Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 10:14:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0088_01BF0B2C.9F588B70" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0088_01BF0B2C.9F588B70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everybody I found a program one of this days about tcp analysis, called tcptrace. = It has plenty of functions, and I think it is very useful for its = purpose. I looked in the source code and I found, related to the = acknowledging process, the notion of quadrant. Does anybody know what is = it about or where to find out more about this? Thank you very much Best regards Bogdan Ghita ------=_NextPart_000_0088_01BF0B2C.9F588B70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello everybody
I found a program one of this days = about tcp=20 analysis, called tcptrace. It has plenty of functions, and I think it is = very=20 useful for its purpose. I looked in the source code and I found, related = to the=20 acknowledging process, the notion of quadrant. Does anybody know what is = it=20 about or where to find out more about this?
Thank you very much
 
Best regards
Bogdan Ghita
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0088_01BF0B2C.9F588B70-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Sep 30 2:58:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from btm4r4.alcatel.be (btm4r4.alcatel.be [195.207.101.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC40159BB for ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 02:58:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from livensw@rc.bel.alcatel.be) Received: from btmq9s.rc.bel.alcatel.be (btmq9s.rc.bel.alcatel.be [138.203.65.182]) by btm4r4.alcatel.be (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA09280; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:58:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from btm0uk.rc.bel.alcatel.be (btm0uk [138.203.64.189]) by btmq9s.rc.bel.alcatel.be (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA26885; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:59:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from livensw@localhost) by btm0uk.rc.bel.alcatel.be (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id LAA14477; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:57:24 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:57:24 +0200 From: Wim Livens To: Mik Thwaite Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installing two NICs Message-ID: <19990930115724.A14415@rc.bel.alcatel.be> References: <003301bf0af2$1d1bfc80$4a741cac@SUNDERLAND> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i In-Reply-To: <003301bf0af2$1d1bfc80$4a741cac@SUNDERLAND>; from Mik Thwaite on Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 08:15:52PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The other - 3Com Etherlink III 3C509 Assy 8362-11 Rev B does not > work at all with FBSD but is OK with Win95. Have you configured the cards with different IRQs and io addresses using the DOS utility that came with the cards ? -- Wim Livens. Alcatel - Corporate Research Center wim.livens@alcatel.be Fr. Wellesplein 1 livensw@rc.bel.alcatel.be B-2018 Antwerpen Tel: +32 3 240 7570 Belgium. Fax: +32 3 240 9932 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Sep 30 7: 2: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from ctlmailgw.comptel.com (ctlmailgw.comptel.com [192.102.20.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A262B159D5 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 07:01:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stefan.parvu@comptel.com) Received: from miina.comptel.com (unverified [194.240.21.9]) by ctlmailgw.comptel.com (Data Fellows SMTPRS 2.04) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 16:54:57 +0300 Received: from comptel.com (xf174.comptel.com [195.237.135.174]) by miina.comptel.com with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.7.1) id RAA24206; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 17:01:12 +0300 (EETDST) Message-Id: <37F37ADD.41739D12@comptel.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 17:59:41 +0300 From: stefan parvu X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bogdan Ghita Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Quadrant. What is it? References: <008b01bf0b24$3ef82040$6531a38d@see.plym.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hi there, Check out this link: ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/OpenBSD/src/lib/libc/quad/quad.h there is a explanation about what is quad --- you can also check the source code from FreeBSD :-) Have a nice day > Bogdan Ghita wrote: > > Hello everybody > I found a program one of this days about tcp analysis, called > tcptrace. It has plenty of functions, and I think it is very useful > for its purpose. I looked in the source code and I found, related to > the acknowledging process, the notion of quadrant. Does anybody know > what is it about or where to find out more about this? > Thank you very much > > Best regards > Bogdan Ghita > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Sep 30 11:16:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from bingsun2.cc.binghamton.edu (bingsun2.cc.binghamton.edu [128.226.6.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D1014CFB for ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:16:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bg24484@binghamton.edu) Received: from localhost (bg24484@localhost) by bingsun2.cc.binghamton.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA28265 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:16:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: bingsun2.cc.binghamton.edu: bg24484 owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:16:12 -0400 (EDT) From: X-Sender: bg24484@bingsun2 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Macros in Tulip drivers... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Can anyone tell me the functionality of the following MACROS in the tulip driver code for the tulip card DEC 21140 located in the directory src/sys/pci/if_de.c TULIP_PERFSTART, TULIP_PERFEND, TULIP_TXDESC_PRESYNC. I havent been able to figure out what they do and their purpose. Regarding DMA there is a macro defined TULIP_BUS_DMA. Does it mean that it is possible to decide whether the TULIP card should use the DMA option or go by the normal programmed I/O option. As would be seen in the function tulip_txput that transfers data into the tulip rings there are blocks of code that use TULIP_BUS_DMA. Is the kernel compiled enabling the macro TULIP_BUS_DMA. Any help would be appreciated. Thanx, Roshan. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Sep 30 14:37:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from nimitz.ca.sandia.gov (nimitz.ca.sandia.gov [146.246.243.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC271557D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:37:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@nimitz.ca.sandia.gov) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by nimitz.ca.sandia.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA47749; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199909302137.OAA47749@nimitz.ca.sandia.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.0 09/18/1999 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV Subject: ALTQ and 3.3-RELEASE From: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Url: http://www.ca.sandia.gov/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_761362155P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:37:51 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --==_Exmh_761362155P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii We have some 3.3-RELEASE machines here, upon which we're trying to install ALTQ. ALTQ 1.2 has support for 3.2-RELEASE, but not 3.3-RELEASE. Does anyone know if there are plans for a newer release, or if the current ALTQ can be made to work? Thanks! Bruce. --==_Exmh_761362155P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use MessageID: Z/df/EMt0+xfmLtwsv4CO+0FWL3a1jkw iQA/AwUBN/PYL9jKMXFboFLDEQJ79wCdFouhQ6bFMkOw5kdNInYARTWnl1QAoKIP Lb/o3Wi995oYxheKv6jgRAT2 =/EG1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_761362155P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Sep 30 22:45:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from super-g.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144DE14F44 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 22:45:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from spork@super-g.com) Received: by super-g.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F30FB912; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 01:45:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by super-g.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 38E17B911 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 01:45:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 01:45:21 -0400 (EDT) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: PPPoE Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It seems more and more ADSL providers in the US are moving from bridged IP over ethernet to PPP over Ethernet as they dump whatever clunky solutions they started with and move to the RedBack "subscriber management system". The idea it seems is to simulate the familiar dialup connection. This lets you hand out dynamic addresses, dump idle users, discourage servers, track usage, hamper NAT, and (the relevant part) discourage people from connecting with anything but "supported" OS's. Is there anyone actively working on PPPoE for FreeBSD? I don't like the whole concept of wrapping so many frames inside each other, but it would be a shame if a bunch of folks with FBSD gateways for their home nets had to move to Win98 and its' ICS (Internet Connection Sharing). Blech. Could user/kernel ppp be modified? How does this work anyhow? Is there an ethernet frame type for PPPoE? How close do you have to get to the ethernet driver to send PPPoE frames? Can any existing PPP implementations easily handle a few megabits/sec on older hardware? Thanks, Charles To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Sep 30 22:50: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED9714D4A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 22:49:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id WAA68217; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 22:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 22:49:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: spork Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPPoE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I think I may be tackling PPPoE in the next week. On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, spork wrote: > It seems more and more ADSL providers in the US are moving from bridged > IP over ethernet to PPP over Ethernet as they dump whatever clunky > solutions they started with and move to the RedBack "subscriber management > system". The idea it seems is to simulate the familiar dialup connection. > This lets you hand out dynamic addresses, dump idle users, discourage > servers, track usage, hamper NAT, and (the relevant part) discourage > people from connecting with anything but "supported" OS's. > > Is there anyone actively working on PPPoE for FreeBSD? I don't like the > whole concept of wrapping so many frames inside each other, but it would > be a shame if a bunch of folks with FBSD gateways for their home nets had > to move to Win98 and its' ICS (Internet Connection Sharing). Blech. > > Could user/kernel ppp be modified? How does this work anyhow? Is there > an ethernet frame type for PPPoE? How close do you have to get to the > ethernet driver to send PPPoE frames? Can any existing PPP implementations > easily handle a few megabits/sec on older hardware? > > Thanks, > > Charles > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 1 6: 7:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from inetfw.sonycsl.co.jp (inetfw.SonyCSL.Co.Jp [203.137.129.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83670157FB for ; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 06:07:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kjc@csl.sony.co.jp) Received: from hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (root@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp [43.27.98.57]) by inetfw.sonycsl.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7Ws3/99071615/smtpfeed 1.01) with ESMTP id WAA98762; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 22:07:32 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (kjc@[127.0.0.1]) by hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (8.8.8/3.7Ws3/hotaka/99071615) with ESMTP id WAA20477; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 22:07:31 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199910011307.WAA20477@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp> To: end2end-interest@ISI.EDU Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, tech-net@netbsd.org Subject: altq-2.0 available Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 22:07:31 +0900 From: Kenjiro Cho Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org A new release of ALTQ is available from http://www.csl.sony.co.jp/~kjc/software.html or ftp://ftp.csl.sony.co.jp/pub/kjc/altq-2.0.tar.gz -Kenjiro ALTQ -- Version 2.0 October 1, 1999 This is a release of Alternate Queueing for BSD UNIX. ALTQ provides queueing schemes required to realize resource-sharing and quality of service. The ALTQ release is intended to be a flexible platform to promote network research and gain field experience. What's New since version 1.2: - HFSC (Hierachical Fair Service Curve) joint work with Hui Zhang's group at CMU. efficient HFSC implementation using 64-bit operations and raw Pentium TSC. decoupling of real-time and link-sharing service curves in order to support a variety of control. - Blue (active queue management) by Wu-chang Feng - altqd a daemon process that handles multiple queueing disciplines using a single configuration file (/etc/altq.conf). currently HFSC, CBQ and CDNR are supported. altqd will replace cbqd in the near future. The default config file for altqd is "/etc/altq.conf". It is backward compatible with cbq.conf. - libaltq API for queue management. - diffserv full EF and AF support traffic conditioning at input interfaces framework for various conditioner elements MF/BA classifier token bucket meter (for EF) two-rate three color maker (for AF) queueing at output interfaces: RIO with 3 drop precedence values RIO is integrated into CBQ or HFSC - pvc bridging ATM PVC bridging support. allows ALTQ to work as a layer 2 device. - FreeBSD-3.3R based. 2.2.8R and 3.2R are also supported. - initial support of NetBSD-1.4/1.4.1 supported drivers are limited: en (pvc), fxp, vr, tl, (lo) only i386 architecture is supported Many new features have been added since version 1.2 so that the major version number is bumped to 2.0. Most of the new features are still under development and they are not fully tested. Especially, the following items are missing in 2.0. - more queueing disciplines should be handled by altqd - altqstat (a stat program for multiple queueing disciplines) - directory reorganization (get rid of *-tools dirs) - rsvp support for HFSC - more drivers for NetBSD - cpu architecture other than i386 You can get the latest ALTQ release from or To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 1 6:59:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from babelbrox.axion.bt.co.uk (babelbrox.axion.bt.co.uk [132.146.16.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6629715488 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 06:58:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from graeme.n.brown@bt.com) Received: from cbtlipnt01.btlabs.bt.co.uk by babelbrox.axion.bt.co.uk (local) with ESMTP; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 14:56:19 +0100 Received: by cbtlipnt01.btlabs.bt.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 14:55:26 +0100 Message-ID: <71DA16F18D32D2119A1D0000F8FE9A9402B5A2F6@mbtlipnt01.btlabs.bt.co.uk> From: graeme.n.brown@bt.com To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Does gdb -k work on FreeBSD-3.2-RELEASE elf kernels ? Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 14:55:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I realise that the following is a little offbeam for freebsd-net but I am trying to fix a networking bug. So I am hoping someone will be kind ... I am trying to trace the line of code which gives a kernel panic in some IP6 code (KAME) which I am modifying on FreeBSD-3.2-RELEASE. I am trying to do a kernel post-mortem analyis with gdb -k etc. I believe I have prepared a kernel (IP6_624) with debug support OK :- cd ~graeme/sys/i386/conf config -gr IP6_624 cd ../../IP6_624 make depend make cp kernel kernel.debug strip -g kernel make install reboot ; dumpon /dev/wd0s1b ( my swap partition) provoke kernel panic, kernel dumps to /dev/wd0s1b after reboot :- cd ~graeme/sys/compile/IP6_624 savecore -N ./kernel.debug /usr/crash which in my case created /usr/crash/kernel.2 and /usr/crash/vmcore.2 but when I run gdb -k I do not seem to see debug symbols :- gdb -k ./kernel.debug /usr/crash/vmcore.2 GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"... IdlePTD 3809280 kernel symbol `gd_curpcb' not found. <--- what does this mean ? (kgdb) where No stack. (kgdb) quit What am I doing wrong ? TIA Graeme N Brown email: graeme.n.brown@bt.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 1 12:48:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5541532E for ; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA23943; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 15:48:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 15:48:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199910011948.PAA23943@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: net@freebsd.org Subject: Announcing alpha release of latd, a continuous latency monitor Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org latd 0.0 is now available for download at . From the README file: ------------------------------------ $Id: README,v 1.3 1999/10/01 19:41:41 wollman Exp $ This is latd, version 0.0. latd is a program which continuously samples network latencies between a management station (the machine running latd) and a list of machines elsewhere on the network. Currently, latd supports the ICMP and UDP ECHO protocols, but adding other protocols (such as HTTP) is a Small Matter of Programming. The significant advantage of latd, as compared to simply periodically pinging every end station, is that it attempts to sample the data in a statistically-useful way. Rather than taking a measurement every fixed interval, latd randomizes its measurement periods uniformly over the range [i/2, 3*i/2], where `i' is the desired average measurement period. (By default, `i' is 20 seconds, which is chosen to give 15 measurements over a 5-minute interval.) By spreading out measurements in this way, the probability of `missing' a network disturbance which takes place between two measurements is lessened. (Suggestions from statisticians as to more appropriate distribution functions are gladly accepted.) By taking measurements over a fairly long average period, it is possible to measure the latency to a large number of destinations without placing an undue burden on the network. Future versions of latd will provide support for configurable periodic statistics generation. Currently, latd will open a couple of log files into which statistics might be written, but the code to actually compute those statistics does not yet exist -- indeed, I have not yet figured out which statistics are worth implementing. In the mean time, latd is still useful using the `-p' option, which specifies a log file to which every observation is written. External scripts, such as the provided `make-plot' and `make-stats', can then post-process this log file to extract interesting information. Future versions of latd will also provide support for configurable alarms, based on the generated statistics or on individual observations. [deletia] ------------------------------------ -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 1 16:12: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (whizzo.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F7514E01 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 16:10:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.transsys.com) Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1]) by whizzo.transsys.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA09717; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 19:10:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.transsys.com) Message-Id: <199910012310.TAA09717@whizzo.transsys.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: spork Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Louis A. Mamakos" Subject: Re: PPPoE References: In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 01 Oct 1999 01:45:21 EDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 19:10:40 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > It seems more and more ADSL providers in the US are moving from bridged > IP over ethernet to PPP over Ethernet as they dump whatever clunky > solutions they started with and move to the RedBack "subscriber management > system". The idea it seems is to simulate the familiar dialup connection. > This lets you hand out dynamic addresses, dump idle users, discourage > servers, track usage, hamper NAT, and (the relevant part) discourage > people from connecting with anything but "supported" OS's. Uh, as one of the folks responsible for driving PPPoE development, I can assure that the last part of your remark wasn't one of the goals we had. It was, in fact, time-to-market given the existing bridged-ethernet capable hardware out there. It was also to support simultanous connections to different service providers, and with different levels of service. Think low-end, consumer user vs. work-at-home teleworkers. Why shouldn't they be able to use the same ADSL pipe to support concurrent access to both e.g., AOL for the kids (that you're paying for yourself) AND higher-performance access that your employer is paying for. > Is there anyone actively working on PPPoE for FreeBSD? I don't like the > whole concept of wrapping so many frames inside each other, but it would > be a shame if a bunch of folks with FBSD gateways for their home nets had > to move to Win98 and its' ICS (Internet Connection Sharing). Blech. > > Could user/kernel ppp be modified? How does this work anyhow? Is there > an ethernet frame type for PPPoE? How close do you have to get to the > ethernet driver to send PPPoE frames? Can any existing PPP implementations > easily handle a few megabits/sec on older hardware? We did a proof-of-concept implemention starting with the user-mode PPP daemon and using BPF to put frames on and off the wire, with no kernel changes. This happened to be done on a BSDI system, but that's really not at all significant. I observed once before that the Whistle netgraph stuff is an ideal sort of solution for this type of problem where you're really concerned about performance, and don't want to context switch into a user process for each packet. louie (aka louie@UU.NET) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 1 16:48:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9D014F24 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 16:48:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA00766; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 16:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 16:47:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: "Louis A. Mamakos" Cc: spork , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPPoE In-Reply-To: <199910012310.TAA09717@whizzo.transsys.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Louis A. Mamakos wrote: > > It seems more and more ADSL providers in the US are moving from bridged > > IP over ethernet to PPP over Ethernet as they dump whatever clunky > > solutions they started with and move to the RedBack "subscriber management > > system". The idea it seems is to simulate the familiar dialup connection. > > This lets you hand out dynamic addresses, dump idle users, discourage > > servers, track usage, hamper NAT, and (the relevant part) discourage > > people from connecting with anything but "supported" OS's. > > Uh, as one of the folks responsible for driving PPPoE development, I can > assure that the last part of your remark wasn't one of the goals we had. > It was, in fact, time-to-market given the existing bridged-ethernet > capable hardware out there. It was also to support simultanous connections > to different service providers, and with different levels of service. Think > low-end, consumer user vs. work-at-home teleworkers. Why shouldn't they > be able to use the same ADSL pipe to support concurrent access to both > e.g., AOL for the kids (that you're paying for yourself) AND > higher-performance > access that your employer is paying for. > > > Is there anyone actively working on PPPoE for FreeBSD? I don't like the > > whole concept of wrapping so many frames inside each other, but it would > > be a shame if a bunch of folks with FBSD gateways for their home nets had > > to move to Win98 and its' ICS (Internet Connection Sharing). Blech. > > > > Could user/kernel ppp be modified? How does this work anyhow? Is there > > an ethernet frame type for PPPoE? How close do you have to get to the > > ethernet driver to send PPPoE frames? Can any existing PPP implementations > > easily handle a few megabits/sec on older hardware? > > We did a proof-of-concept implemention starting with the user-mode PPP > daemon and using BPF to put frames on and off the wire, with no kernel > changes. This happened to be done on a BSDI system, but that's really > not at all significant. > > I observed once before that the Whistle netgraph stuff is an ideal > sort of solution for this type of problem where you're really concerned > about performance, and don't want to context switch into a user process > for each packet. I hope to start work on a netgraph/PPPoE module in the next day or so.. do you have any suggested reading? > > louie > (aka louie@UU.NET) > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 1 17:58:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E11814C0A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 17:58:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id JAA17381; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 09:58:23 +0900 (JST) To: Kenjiro Cho Cc: end2end-interest@ISI.EDU, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, tech-net@netbsd.org In-reply-to: kjc's message of Fri, 01 Oct 1999 22:07:31 JST. <199910011307.WAA20477@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: altq-2.0 available From: itojun@iijlab.net Date: Sat, 02 Oct 1999 09:58:23 +0900 Message-ID: <17379.938825903@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > - initial support of NetBSD-1.4/1.4.1 > supported drivers are limited: en (pvc), fxp, vr, tl, (lo) > only i386 architecture is supported Just FYI: If you port ALTQ to NetBSD-current, I think you do not need to fix all the driver source code, as IF_ENQUE() is shared among the drivers (in net/if_ethersubr.c:ether_output()). I'll try to import ALTQ 2.0 to KAME distribution sooner. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Oct 2 4:57:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7318014F8D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 04:56:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.3/frmug-2.5/nospam) with UUCP id NAA04173 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 13:56:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix, from userid 101) id ECA688711; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 12:55:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 12:55:34 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPPoE Message-ID: <19991002125534.A75432@keltia.freenix.fr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <199910012310.TAA09717@whizzo.transsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT/ELF AMD-K6/200 & 2x PPro/200 SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to Julian Elischer: > I hope to start work on a netgraph/PPPoE module in the next day or so.. > do you have any suggested reading? Is there any project to put Netgraph into CURRENT? That would be nice... -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #74: Thu Sep 9 00:20:51 CEST 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Oct 2 11: 3: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43D0150F4 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 11:02:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from home.elischer.org (home.elischer.org [207.76.204.203]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA18824; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 11:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer X-Sender: julian@home.elischer.org To: Ollivier Robert Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPPoE In-Reply-To: <19991002125534.A75432@keltia.freenix.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'd like to, but it doesn't have a 'killer app' so it's been suggested by someone that they'd rather we didn't. If other people found uses for it, that would make it easier, but as there is not a single other peroson that has found a use for it other than us, I really don't have clearance to add it. (clearance from freebsd people that is, Whistle couldn't care....) julian On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Julian Elischer: > > I hope to start work on a netgraph/PPPoE module in the next day or so.. > > do you have any suggested reading? > > Is there any project to put Netgraph into CURRENT? That would be nice... > -- > Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr > FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #74: Thu Sep 9 00:20:51 CEST 1999 > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Oct 2 21:24:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445FA14E85 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 21:24:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id VAA09140; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 21:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 21:24:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: net@freebsd.org Cc: louie@uu.net Subject: PPPoE testers please. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have PPPoE code mapped out but I will need someone to test with at some stage. Is there anyone that has such a setup that can be used for testing? Also, Is ther anyone out there that knows what the normal kinds of "service name" might look like? for that matter, What is a likely example of an AC-Name? I ask this because if I knew that these values were less than 15 or 31 bytes in length I might take a different approach to that I would need if they can be 256 bytes on length. (I'm presently assuming the latter). julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Oct 2 21:41: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679841541D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 21:41:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id VAA09339; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 21:41:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 21:40:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: louie@uu.net Subject: Re: PPPoE testers please. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org More questions.. Should a FreeBSd box running PPPoE be able to run multiple PPPoE sessions? (i.e. each with a different Session_ID) Can there be multiple sessions to the same AC requesting the same Service, from the same host? What about differnt services? (what ARE the possible services?) Might multiple ISPs offer ppp session services on the same cable, competing with each other? Julian On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Julian Elischer wrote: > > I have PPPoE code mapped out but I will need someone to test with at some > stage. Is there anyone that has such a setup that can be used for testing? > > Also, Is ther anyone out there that knows what the normal kinds of > "service name" might look like? > for that matter, What is a likely example of an AC-Name? > > I ask this because if I knew that these values were less than 15 or 31 > bytes in length I might take a different approach to that I would need if > they can be 256 bytes on length. (I'm presently assuming the latter). > > julian > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message