From owner-freebsd-alpha Sun Aug 20 13:51:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (mail.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6257237B42C for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2000 13:51:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <115216>; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 06:51:04 +1000 Content-return: prohibited Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 06:50:54 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: optimized mem* and str* functions In-reply-to: <20000819152032.A1483@freebie.demon.nl>; from wkb@freebie.demon.nl on Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 03:20:32PM +0200 To: Wilko Bulte Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.org Mail-followup-to: Wilko Bulte , alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <00Aug21.065104est.115216@border.alcanet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i References: <39999750.C80F3B0B@imimic.com> <00Aug18.140950est.115233@border.alcanet.com.au> <20000819152032.A1483@freebie.demon.nl> Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 2000-Aug-19 15:20:32 +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: >The later alpha/AXP implementations have byte manipulation instructions >IIRC. Correct. > Are they used when available? DEC CC and (AFAIK) GCC don't generate them by default, but they can be enabled (with GCC) by specifying `-mbwx' or `-mcpu=ev56' (or later). Note that using the byte instructions isn't necessarily an optimisation. It's often (usually?) faster to load a full register and unroll the loop to process each byte in the register. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-alpha Sun Aug 20 15:26:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mail.du.gtn.com (mail.du.gtn.com [194.77.9.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0EE37B422 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2000 15:26:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cicely.de (cicely.de [194.231.9.142]) by mail.du.gtn.com (8.11.0.Beta3/8.11.0.Beta3) with ESMTP id e7KMPxF27224 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified OK); Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:26:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [10.1.5.7]) by mail.cicely.de (8.11.0.Beta1/8.11.0.Beta1) with ESMTP id e7KMQ9q69699; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:26:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.9.3/8.9.2) id AAA41581; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:25:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:25:52 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: "Andrew M. Miklic" Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Serial Debug Message-ID: <20000821002552.A41422@cicely5.cicely.de> References: <399EDB4F.F96BACD@attglobal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <399EDB4F.F96BACD@attglobal.net>; from miklic@attglobal.net on Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 01:09:04PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 01:09:04PM -0600, Andrew M. Miklic wrote: > Does anyone know how to do serial debug? I'm trying to test TGA code, > and I want to monitor a remote, headless system's output on my primary > system... > > I tried: > > cu -l /dev/cuaa0 -s 9600 If the port is the right one this should work. Are you shure that the remote system is configured to react on the seriel? > but nothing happens--I'm guessing either I'm missing a configuration > file, my baud-rate is wrong, or I have the wrong type of cable (I'm > using a null-cable)... Cable should be OK. If it's the system console and SRM no handshake is needed. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-alpha Sun Aug 20 22:15:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from picalon.gun.de (picalon.gun.de [192.109.159.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9849937B422 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2000 22:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by picalon.gun.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA09965 for freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 07:15:25 +0200 (MET DST) >Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA02662 for freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 07:05:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 07:05:49 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: freebsd 4.0-STABLE, jade terminates with signal 11 Message-ID: <20000821070549.A1230@titan.klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE SMP X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi ! jade produced a core dump, gdb also core dumped after trying to analyse jades coredump and creates a ~50MB coredump. andreas@srv1{3} $ gdb --version GNU gdb 4.18 Is this a know problem ? Do we have to update to 4.1-STABLE ? What about gdb ? A developer account would be possible on that machine (via ssh). Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm Powered by FreeBSD SMP Songs from our band >>64Bits<<............http://www.apsfilter.org/64bits.html My homepage................................ http://people.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas Please note: Apsfilter got a NEW HOME................http://www.apsfilter.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Aug 21 0:20:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from master.telia.net (master.telia.net [194.237.170.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF96837B42C for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (elite@localhost) by master.telia.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA91791; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:20:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from khaled@w-arts.com) X-Authentication-Warning: master.telia.net: elite owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:20:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Khaled Daham X-Sender: elite@master.telia.net To: Robert Bailey Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X on alpha 4.1-RELEASE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Robert Bailey wrote: > I've been using RedHat Linux on my alpha 164LX machine and wanted to play > with FreeBSD for the alpha. I installed 4.1-RELEASE via ftp and all seems > well except that when I switch to X Window, none of the window managers > seem to behave correctly. Specifically, dialog boxes appear, but I can't > see any of the dialogs or buttons. Xterm works, but none of the widgets > look right and the docked apps are just black squares. Anyone have an > idea what I have done wrong? Sorry if this is not an appropriate > question for this list. If it's not appropriate here, please let me know > where would be better. I figured the freebsd-questions list seemed to be > intel-centric. I have succesfully used matrox millenium I/II, G200, S3 Virge Trio3D, diamond FireGL 1000 pro with windowmanagers like windowmaker, enlightenment and fvwm2 so the only basic thing I can think of ( since Ive had 0 problem ) is what depth resolution are you using ? ( xwininfo could help ) /Khaled Daham, w.arts Mail: khaled@w-arts.com Cell: +46-70-6785492, +966-54491462 FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Aug 21 0:25:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from bayer2.bayer-ag.de (bayer2.bayer-ag.de [194.120.191.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6782A37B424 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BYE473.BAYER-AG.DE (bye473.bayer-ag.com) by bayer2.bayer-ag.de with SMTP id JAA18040 (SMTP Gateway 4.2 for ); Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:25:02 +0200 Received: by BYE473.BAYER-AG.DE (Soft-Switch LMS 3.2) with snapi via MT0044 id 0006800029488466; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:24:56 +0200 From: andreas.klemm.ak@bayer-ag.de To: " - *ticso@cicely5.cicely.de" Cc: " - *apsfilter-doc@apsfilter.org" , " - *freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org" , " - *bernd@apsfilter.org" Subject: Antwort: Re: jade problems Message-Id: <0006800029488466000002L062*@MHS> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:24:56 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Bernd, there has also been a problem during runtime in former release of the jade port see here: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/textproc/jade/Makefile.diff?r1=1.25& r2=1.26 the previous version of jade ports Makefile tells: .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "alpha" BROKEN= nsgmls coredumps in static constructors .endif Could perhaps somebody from the freebsd-alpha list confirm if or if not the FreeBSD docu can be "compiled" using jade without coredumps or not ?! BTW, sorry for this excellent mailer (Lotus notes) Andreas /// ticso@cicely5.cicely.de on 21.08.2000 07:43:10 An: Andreas Klemm/EXQEJ/CH/DE/BAYER@BAYERNOTES, bernd@apsfilter.org@INTERNET Kopie: Thema: Re: jade problems On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 07:27:58AM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote: > X-Dis claimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular > > What about upgrading the machine to FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE ? I don't like the idea because our uptime is already 29 days ;) > Then we could be more precise on saying, the last recent > -STABLE release has problems with compiling and running jade... > > On the other hand we would have a good chance to get rid of the > error, because the BROKEN flag has been deleted for jade... > > This might be the case because the bugs have been fixed in > 4.1-STABLE ... What I understood is that the fixed bug was that jade did not even compile. And that the port was fixed not the operating system. Well we are using the latest port - and we can type cvs update in the portsdir wheneven we need. I don't asume there are relevant changes in STABLE since - but I can test this on my home system with a more or less recent current. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Aug 21 19:25: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from ptldpop3.ptld.uswest.net (ptldpop3.ptld.uswest.net [198.36.160.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1BBF37B423 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 19:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 90891 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2000 02:24:58 -0000 Delivered-To: fixup-freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org@fixme Received: (qmail 90879 invoked by uid 0); 22 Aug 2000 02:24:58 -0000 Received: from win2k.gplsucks.org (HELO win2k) (63.227.213.89) by ptldpop3.ptld.uswest.net with SMTP; 22 Aug 2000 02:24:58 -0000 From: "William Woods" To: Subject: Make World Dies......... Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 19:27:08 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Running FreeBSD alpha.gplsucks.org 4.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE #0 I did a cvsup this morning and make world gives me this. This an Alpha btw. ------------------------------- p.S -o setjmp.o cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -D__ DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DINET6 -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../ libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DYP -I/usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/alpha/gen/flt_rounds.c -o flt_rounds.o cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DINET6 -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/ ../libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DYP -I/usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/alpha/gen/fpgetmask.c -o fpgetmask.o In file included from /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/alpha/gen/fpgetmask.c:36: /usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/ieeefp.h:21: syntax error before `fpgetmask' /usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/ieeefp.h:21: warning: data definition has no type or storage class /usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/ieeefp.h:22: syntax error before `fpsetmask' /usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/ieeefp.h:22: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration /usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/ieeefp.h:22: warning: data definition has no type or storage class /usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/ieeefp.h:23: syntax error before `fpgetsticky' /usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/ieeefp.h:23: warning: data definition has no type or storage class /usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/ieeefp.h:24: syntax error before `fpsetsticky' /usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/ieeefp.h:24: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration /usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/include/ieeefp.h:24: warning: data definition has no type or storage class /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/alpha/gen/fpgetmask.c:44: syntax error before `fpgetmask' /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/alpha/gen/fpgetmask.c: In function `fpgetmask': /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/alpha/gen/fpgetmask.c:49: `fp_except_t' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/alpha/gen/fpgetmask.c:49: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/alpha/gen/fpgetmask.c:49: for each function it appears in.) /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/alpha/gen/fpgetmask.c:49: syntax error before `p' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib/libc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. ------------------- any ideas whats up? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Aug 22 11:28:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.sitaranetworks.com (apollo.sitaranetworks.com [199.103.141.105]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7997537B443 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 11:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peking.sitaranetworks.com (peking.sitaranetworks.com [199.103.141.102]) by apollo.sitaranetworks.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA25197 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:28:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sitaranetworks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peking.sitaranetworks.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04385 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:31:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from cmr@sitaranetworks.com) Message-ID: <39A2C6F6.F1D3D1F0@sitaranetworks.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:31:18 -0400 From: Charles Richmond X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: ja, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Status of the Alpha port Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Gentle pers Perhaps I am just being blind )-: but info about the port to alpha seems hard to find. Who is actually working on the port, is there a different tree. Am I going to be able to install and boot a FreeBSD alpha? Snapshots? Alpha specific FAQ? We currently use FreeBSD on x86 and are concerned with multiplatform capabilities for our next generation. Thus I am examining the 3 major BSDs to help in choosing our next OS/version. Supposedly beast.freebsd.org is an alpha running FreeBSD, but which version ? If the port is not curently buildable/installable can I get at beast to do an eval? TIA Charles Richmond To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Aug 22 12: 9: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC0837B424 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 12:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA78408; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 12:08:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200008221908.MAA78408@winston.osd.bsdi.com> To: Charles Richmond Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of the Alpha port In-Reply-To: Message from Charles Richmond of "Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:31:18 EDT." <39A2C6F6.F1D3D1F0@sitaranetworks.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 12:08:47 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Perhaps I am just being blind )-: but info about the port to alpha > seems hard to find. Who is actually working on the port, is there a > different tree. Am I going to be able to install and boot a FreeBSD Hi Charles, The FreeBSD/alpha support is completely merged into our standard tree and you can either get CDROM versions of the product from the FreeBSD Mall (www.freebsdmall.com - the 4.1 version is coming out very shortly) or do a snapshot installation from ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/alpha (though the last snapshot there is from May and really needs to be updated). > help in choosing our next OS/version. Supposedly beast.freebsd.org > is an alpha running FreeBSD, but which version ? If the port is not > curently buildable/installable can I get at beast to do an eval? jkh@beast-> uname -a FreeBSD beast.freebsd.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Fri Aug 4 02:09:49 PDT 2000 root@beast.freebsd.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/BEAST alpha And yes, access to beast is certainly an option. If David O'Brien is listening, perhaps he can do another snapshot build for us just as soon as green unbreaks the crypto libraries. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-alpha Wed Aug 23 0: 3:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [209.152.133.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F9237B43C for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 00:03:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id AAA01818; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 00:03:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 00:03:10 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: Charles Richmond , freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of the Alpha port Message-ID: <20000823000310.A489@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200008221908.MAA78408@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200008221908.MAA78408@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 12:08:47PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 12:08:47PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > or do a snapshot installation from > ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/alpha (though the last > snapshot there is from May and really needs to be updated). Acutally the most receint snapshot is at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/alpha/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-alpha Thu Aug 24 10:36:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mail.du.gtn.com (mail.du.gtn.com [194.77.9.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE9037B422 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cicely.de (cicely.de [194.231.9.142]) by mail.du.gtn.com (8.11.0.Beta3/8.11.0.Beta3) with ESMTP id e7OHabW05499 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified OK) for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 19:36:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from cicely8.cicely.de (cicely8.cicely.de [10.1.2.10]) by mail.cicely.de (8.11.0.Beta1/8.11.0.Beta1) with ESMTP id e7OHalq82982 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 19:36:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely8.cicely.de (8.9.3/8.9.2) id TAA30170 for freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 19:36:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 19:36:46 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: top: cannot read blmeta_t: Message-ID: <20000824193646.A30152@cicely8.cicely.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I get this error message with a recent current when running top. Same source on i386 runs fine. World and kernel are in sync. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-alpha Thu Aug 24 11:45:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from rios.sitaranetworks.com (rios.sitaranetworks.com [199.103.141.78]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13EC37B422 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:45:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by RIOS with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 14:48:08 -0400 Message-ID: <31269226357BD211979E00A0C9866DABE411EA@RIOS> From: Charles Richmond To: "'freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: RE: Status of the Alpha port Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 14:48:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----Original Message----- > From: Craig Burgess [mailto:craig-burgess@home.net] > As I'm sure you will find out (or already have) the Alpha/AXP port is > a released product. I'm running 4.10-RELEASE on a 21164a processor, > 3com nics, generic ncr SCSI controller & etc on a PC164 motherboard. Yes, I did. Thank you all. I have to admit that I was precipitous in sending that email. I went to the web page and the only link was to the mailing list so I wrongly assumed ... Anyway I have tried to load up 4.1 on a old Multia vx42 (233mhz cpu) and it fails fairly spectacularly with pin 30 axpcpu bad interrupt errors. The same box runs OpenBSD 2.6 and is in the process of loading NetBSD 1.5_ALPHA2 so I will probably try to load FreeBSD 4.0 and maybe try 4.1 on a newer box later. The real fun is going to be when I try to port all of our network kernel hacks to whichever variant wins the shooting match. (-: Charlie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-alpha Thu Aug 24 17:26:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from toe.nx.nextra.sk (toe.nx.nextra.sk [195.168.1.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6D2337B43F for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 16707 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2000 00:26:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO TPS) (195.168.29.2) by smtp2.nextra.sk with SMTP; 25 Aug 2000 00:26:25 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 02:26:24 +0200 From: Tomas TPS Ulej X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.45) Business Reply-To: Tomas TPS Ulej Organization: NEXTRA X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <19838875540.20000825022624@ncc.nextra.sk> Disposition-Notification-To: tps@ncc.nextra.sk To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Oracle on FreeBSD r4.x on Alpha Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Any experiences/idea? We are now: root@[toe /root] # uname -a FreeBSD toe.nx.nextra.sk 4.0-STABLE FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE #1: Sun Jun 4 15:20:52 CEST 2000 root@toe.nx.nextra.sk:/usr/src/sys/compile/tps alpha (4x) but soon if I will be not able to run Oracle r8 client we will move to True64 UNIX :( That's pity because we are now sk.freebsd.org mirror site. Thanx for any idea how to start Oracle r8 client up ;) Regards -- Tomas TPS Ulej NEXTRA Slovakia more? http://x.tps.sk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-alpha Sat Aug 26 14:50: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F9A37B440 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2000 14:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id OAA61350; Sat, 26 Aug 2000 14:50:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [212.227.14.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6B037B422 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2000 14:47:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bigeye.mips.inka.de (uucp@) by mail.inka.de with local-bsmtp id 13Snmw-0005Z7-00; Sat, 26 Aug 2000 23:46:54 +0200 Received: (from naddy@localhost) by bigeye.mips.inka.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA89232; Sat, 26 Aug 2000 23:38:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from naddy) Message-Id: <200008262138.XAA89232@bigeye.mips.inka.de> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 23:38:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Weisgerber Reply-To: naddy@mips.inka.de To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: alpha/20873: tdfx module doesn't build Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Number: 20873 >Category: alpha >Synopsis: tdfx module doesn't build >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-alpha >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Aug 26 14:50:01 PDT 2000 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Christian Weisgerber >Release: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT alpha >Organization: >Environment: "make buildkernel KERNEL=GENERIC" during 4.1->5.0 update Presumably this applies to builds on 5.0-CURRENT, too. >Description: The tdfx module doesn't build on alpha. By default, TDFX_LINUX is defined. This triggers the inclusion of and which apparently don't exist on alpha. sys/modules/3dfx/Makefile # defines TDFX_LINUX sys/dev/tdfx/tdfx_pci.c # includes tdfx_linux.h ifdef TDFX_LINUX sys/dev/tdfx/tdfx_linux.h # includes machine/../linux/* headers >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: --- sys/modules/3dfx/Makefile.orig Thu Aug 24 17:09:46 2000 +++ sys/modules/3dfx/Makefile Thu Aug 24 17:11:10 2000 @@ -9,9 +9,11 @@ CLEANFILES= pci.h +.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386" # This line enables linux ioctl handling by default # comment out if you don't want it TDFX_OPTS= "\#define TDFX_LINUX" +.endif # Uncomment this for debugging messages #CFLAGS+= -DDEBUG >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message