From owner-freebsd-fs Sun May 7 0:20: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A9737B8C5; Sun, 7 May 2000 00:20:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id AAA60813; Sun, 7 May 2000 00:20:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 00:20:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Erez Zadok Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: announcing stackable file system templates and code generator In-Reply-To: <200005030825.EAA21516@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 3 May 2000, Erez Zadok wrote: > It is my pleasure to announce fistgen-0.0.1, the first release of the FiST > code generator, used to create stackable file systems out of templates and a > high-level language. This package comes with stackable file system > templates for Linux, Solaris, and FreeBSD. It also contains several sample I think your work has been overlooked by the FreeBSD community - I was going to go and make a port of this so people could play with it more easily, but I discovered it doesn't have support for 5.0-CURRENT (phk's struct buf changes seem to have broken it if I just copy the 4.0-REL template). I wonder if you (or someone else) would be able to look at this? Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Sun May 7 0:38:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD8237B8BC; Sun, 7 May 2000 00:38:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id AAA61891; Sun, 7 May 2000 00:38:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 00:38:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Erez Zadok Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: announcing stackable file system templates and code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 7 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > template). I wonder if you (or someone else) would be able to look at > this? Oops, I should have waited a few moments before replying. It was actually pretty easy to fix - #include just needs to be added to the headers. Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Sun May 7 1:13:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E49237BA7C; Sun, 7 May 2000 01:13:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id BAA64983; Sun, 7 May 2000 01:13:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 01:13:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Erez Zadok Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: announcing stackable file system templates and code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 7 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Oops, I should have waited a few moments before replying. It was actually > pretty easy to fix - #include just needs to be added to the > headers. Okay, next problem. I'm trying to play with the sample filesystems by using them on a vn, but it doesnt seem to be working. For example, the rot13fs KLD loads fine and I can mount it on my vn partition, but it gives the wrong disk size, and the mountpoint turns into a character-special device: df -k returns: /dev/vn1c 99183 80330 10919 88% /mnt crw-r----- 1 root operator 43, 10 May 7 01:00 /mnt The backing store in this case was a 30M file. Any ideas? Could this have something to do with the removal of block devices? Kris P.S. aclfs seems to have an #if 0'd section which prevents the KLD from loading: aclfs_decode_block is defined out in subr.c, but referenced from elsewhere in the code. ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Sun May 7 4:11:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562AD37B60F for ; Sun, 7 May 2000 04:11:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from nlsys.demon.co.uk ([158.152.125.33] helo=herring.nlsystems.com) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12oOyF-000GhK-0Y; Sun, 7 May 2000 12:11:36 +0100 Received: from salmon.nlsystems.com (salmon.nlsystems.com [10.0.0.3]) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA56977; Sun, 7 May 2000 12:06:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 12:08:30 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: Bjoern Fischer Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFSv4 In-Reply-To: <20000506174054.A545@frolic.no-support.loc> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 6 May 2000, Bjoern Fischer wrote: > Hello, > > Is there an (experimental) NFSv4 implementation for FreeBSD out there? > Or does anyone plan to implement NFSv4 for FreeBSD? > > What are the biggest show stoppers for a straight forward > implementation of NFSv4 on FreeBSD? RPCSEC_GSS? Locking? Implmenting this would be a large job. I'm pretty sure it would be a bad idea to shoehorn it into the NFSv3 code for stability reasons. As far as I know no-one is working on this yet. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 20 8442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Mon May 8 9:47:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from cs.columbia.edu (cs.columbia.edu [128.59.16.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1696F37B7CD; Mon, 8 May 2000 09:47:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ezk@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu) Received: from shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu (shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.18.15]) by cs.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA09331; Mon, 8 May 2000 12:47:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from ezk@localhost) by shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA17284; Mon, 8 May 2000 12:47:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 12:47:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200005081647.MAA17284@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu> From: Erez Zadok To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Erez Zadok , freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: announcing stackable file system templates and code generator In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 07 May 2000 01:13:56 PDT." Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message , Kris Kennaway writes: > On Sun, 7 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Oops, I should have waited a few moments before replying. It was actually > > pretty easy to fix - #include just needs to be added to the > > headers. > > Okay, next problem. I'm trying to play with the sample filesystems by > using them on a vn, but it doesnt seem to be working. For example, the > rot13fs KLD loads fine and I can mount it on my vn partition, but it gives > the wrong disk size, and the mountpoint turns into a character-special > device: > > df -k returns: > > /dev/vn1c 99183 80330 10919 88% /mnt > > crw-r----- 1 root operator 43, 10 May 7 01:00 /mnt > > The backing store in this case was a 30M file. > > Any ideas? Could this have something to do with the removal of block > devices? > > Kris > > P.S. aclfs seems to have an #if 0'd section which prevents the KLD from > loading: aclfs_decode_block is defined out in subr.c, but referenced from > elsewhere in the code. > > ---- > In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. > -- Charles Forsythe Kris, I'll take a look at all these problems. Which version of FreeBSD were you trying? I've not tried 5.0 yet; I don't even have an installed machine for it. To port my templates to 5.0 properly, I'll have to check for any VFS changes b/t 4.0 and 5.0. (I'm surprised, but pleased, that it seems to work somehow.) BTW, can you send me a small patch for the fixes to get 5.0 working? Thanks, Erez. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Mon May 8 12:45:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5546B37B50E; Mon, 8 May 2000 12:45:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA83495; Mon, 8 May 2000 12:45:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 12:45:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Erez Zadok Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: announcing stackable file system templates and code generator In-Reply-To: <200005081647.MAA17284@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 8 May 2000, Erez Zadok wrote: > Kris, I'll take a look at all these problems. Which version of > FreeBSD were you trying? I've not tried 5.0 yet; I don't even have an > installed machine for it. I'm running a recent version of 5.0-CURRENT. > To port my templates to 5.0 properly, I'll have to check for any VFS changes > b/t 4.0 and 5.0. (I'm surprised, but pleased, that it seems to work > somehow.) Thanks! Do you know if it is supposed to work on vn devices on other releases? > BTW, can you send me a small patch for the fixes to get 5.0 working? The only patch I needed to apply to make the code compile was the one below (after copying the 4.0-R template directory to 5.0-R) --- ../FreeBSD-4.0-RELEASE/fist.h Mon Apr 3 19:47:52 2000 +++ fist.h Sun May 7 00:50:54 2000 @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Mon May 8 13:29: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3E737BD67; Mon, 8 May 2000 13:28:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA02615; Mon, 8 May 2000 13:28:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 13:28:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Doug Rabson Cc: Bjoern Fischer , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFSv4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 7 May 2000, Doug Rabson wrote: > Implmenting this would be a large job. I'm pretty sure it would be a bad > idea to shoehorn it into the NFSv3 code for stability reasons. As far as I > know no-one is working on this yet. Actually, wasnt David Cross working on this (newly-added 200th FreeBSD committer)? Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Tue May 9 0:18:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from cs.columbia.edu (cs.columbia.edu [128.59.16.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC7037BD5F; Tue, 9 May 2000 00:18:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ezk@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu) Received: from shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu (shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.18.15]) by cs.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA22400; Tue, 9 May 2000 03:18:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from ezk@localhost) by shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA03595; Tue, 9 May 2000 03:18:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 03:18:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200005090718.DAA03595@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu> From: Erez Zadok To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Erez Zadok , freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: announcing stackable file system templates and code generator In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 May 2000 12:45:14 PDT." Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message , Kris Kennaway writes: > On Mon, 8 May 2000, Erez Zadok wrote: > [...] > Thanks! Do you know if it is supposed to work on vn devices on other > releases? No I don't, as I never tried it on top of one of those. I mostly tried on top of regular ffs mounted directories. Can you try that to see if the problems go away? It'll help me narrow down the problem. Tnx. [...] > Kris Erez. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Tue May 9 0:34:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD54D37BDD1; Tue, 9 May 2000 00:34:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id AAA83120; Tue, 9 May 2000 00:34:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 00:34:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Erez Zadok Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: announcing stackable file system templates and code generator In-Reply-To: <200005090718.DAA03595@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 9 May 2000, Erez Zadok wrote: > No I don't, as I never tried it on top of one of those. I mostly tried on > top of regular ffs mounted directories. Can you try that to see if the > problems go away? It'll help me narrow down the problem. Tnx. Well, I feel stupid. These are *stacking* FSes, duh. I was trying to mount_foofs on a device (/dev/vn1c), not over a UFS-mounted directory. I've just tried that (over a UFS on a vn) and rot13fs at least seems to work fine. Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Tue May 9 0:40:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from cs.columbia.edu (cs.columbia.edu [128.59.16.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57F937BDE9; Tue, 9 May 2000 00:40:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ezk@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu) Received: from shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu (shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.18.15]) by cs.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA24509; Tue, 9 May 2000 03:40:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from ezk@localhost) by shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA04200; Tue, 9 May 2000 03:40:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 03:40:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200005090740.DAA04200@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu> From: Erez Zadok To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Erez Zadok , freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: announcing stackable file system templates and code generator In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 May 2000 00:34:47 PDT." Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message , Kris Kennaway writes: > On Tue, 9 May 2000, Erez Zadok wrote: > > > No I don't, as I never tried it on top of one of those. I mostly tried on > > top of regular ffs mounted directories. Can you try that to see if the > > problems go away? It'll help me narrow down the problem. Tnx. > > Well, I feel stupid. These are *stacking* FSes, duh. I was trying to > mount_foofs on a device (/dev/vn1c), not over a UFS-mounted directory. > > I've just tried that (over a UFS on a vn) and rot13fs at least seems to > work fine. > > Kris > > ---- > In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. > -- Charles Forsythe It would be excellent news to know that my 4.0 templates work with minor changes on 5.0. Do me a favor and try my standard test case on rot13fs or cryptfs: unpack and build the latest am-utils (or emacs, or your favorite large compile job) inside the stacked f/s. If it passes a few runs, it's most likely ok. Thanks, Erez. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Tue May 9 1:25:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B9037BAAA; Tue, 9 May 2000 01:25:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id BAA89032; Tue, 9 May 2000 01:25:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 01:25:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Erez Zadok Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: announcing stackable file system templates and code generator In-Reply-To: <200005090740.DAA04200@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 9 May 2000, Erez Zadok wrote: > It would be excellent news to know that my 4.0 templates work with minor > changes on 5.0. > > Do me a favor and try my standard test case on rot13fs or cryptfs: unpack > and build the latest am-utils (or emacs, or your favorite large compile job) > inside the stacked f/s. If it passes a few runs, it's most likely ok. Unfortunately there do seem to be problems, unless I made another mistake. I didn't want to potentially trash my FS (I don't yet have a spare "disposable" disk), so I used a vn, as follows: vnconfig -S 100m -s labels -e /dev/vn0c [ Configures a 100m swap-backed vn device ] disklabel -rw vn0 auto newfs /dev/vn0c mount /dev/vn0c /mnt kldload ./rot13fs.ko ./mount_rot13fs -t rot13fs /mnt /mnt2 cd /mnt2 tar xvfz ${DISTDIR}/xemacs-21.1.9.tar.gz At this point, /mnt correctly contains a duplicate copy of the xemacs distribution, rot13-encoded (well, as far as I checked). However, if I do a `pwd`, I am apparently now in /mnt, no longer /mnt2, and the following kind of thing happens: mollari# cd /mnt2/xemacs-21.1.9/ mollari# pwd /mnt/xemacs-21.1.9 When I try and run ./configure, it dies with the following: mollari# ./configure checking host system type... i386-unknown-freebsd5.0 checking whether ln -s works... yes checking the configuration name ./configure: /mnt/xemacs-21.1.9/config.sub: not found even though config.sub does exist in both filesystems. I also had problems unmounting the filesystem on /mnt2 - I'd get a "file system busy" even when there were no open files referring to it, and even when I try and umount -f. The above instructions should also work unchanged on 4.0-R, so you should be easily able to test whether it's something to do with vn devices, or if it's 5.0 which is breaking. Hope this helps, Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Wed May 10 4:19:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0786B37B6B2 for ; Wed, 10 May 2000 04:19:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from atrn@zeta.org.au) Received: from ska.bsn (ppp247.dyn144.pacific.net.au [210.23.144.247]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA19671 for ; Wed, 10 May 2000 21:19:29 +1000 Received: (from andy@localhost) by ska.bsn (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA18301 for freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 10 May 2000 21:24:50 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from andy) Message-Id: <200005101124.VAA18301@ska.bsn> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 21:24:50 +1000 (EST) From: atrn@zeta.org.au Reply-To: atrn@zeta.org.au Subject: Seen on USENET... To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org With the upcoming, potential, release of Plan 9 this could be useful, Newsgroups: comp.os.plan9 Subject: Re: [9fans] encrypt(void*, void*, int) and authentication Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu By the way, dong lin (dong@research.bell-labs.com) has implemented both IL and 9P in the FreeBSD kernel. Mail him if you want a copy. -- Chuck Berry lied about the promised land To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Wed May 10 11:23:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mail.sullivan-reportlibrary.com (chrtn1UBR2-3-hfc-0252-d8d8b012.rdc1.tn.comcastatwork.com [216.216.176.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6641A37B935 for ; Wed, 10 May 2000 11:23:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marketing@infotechsys.net) Received: from infotechsys.net (2K-SERVER [192.168.0.100]) by mail.sullivan-reportlibrary.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id KTQY5NZ2; Wed, 10 May 2000 14:20:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: marketing@infotechsys.net Reply-To: marketing@infotechsys.net To: fs@freebsd.org Subject: ITS Brochure Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <20000510182343.6641A37B935@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 11:23:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ITS Internet Site

P.O. Box 70671

Charleston, SC 29415-0671

843.566.1397


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-fs Wed May 10 17: 6:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from smtp05.primenet.com (smtp05.primenet.com [206.165.6.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB0037B9CC for ; Wed, 10 May 2000 17:06:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert@usr01.primenet.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp05.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA04287; Wed, 10 May 2000 17:06:05 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr01.primenet.com(206.165.6.201) via SMTP by smtp05.primenet.com, id smtpdAAA1Xaavi; Wed May 10 17:05:59 2000 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA11998; Wed, 10 May 2000 17:05:54 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <200005110005.RAA11998@usr01.primenet.com> Subject: Re: NFSv4 To: bfischer@Techfak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Bjoern Fischer) Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 00:05:54 +0000 (GMT) Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20000506174054.A545@frolic.no-support.loc> from "Bjoern Fischer" at May 06, 2000 05:40:54 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Is there an (experimental) NFSv4 implementation for FreeBSD out there? > Or does anyone plan to implement NFSv4 for FreeBSD? > > What are the biggest show stoppers for a straight forward > implementation of NFSv4 on FreeBSD? RPCSEC_GSS? Locking? The locking protocol built into NFSv4 doesn't do delayed coelescence, and so is unsuitable for use with a stacking architecture that aggregates two or more filesystems as one (e.g. a remotely mouted CDROM and a translucent layer mounted from a second machine). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message