Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 05:17:09 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org>, <alpha@FreeBSD.org>, Matthew Jacob <mjacob@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Makefile.inc1 clobbers CFLAGS (was: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1) Message-ID: <20011029045531.R5004-100000@delplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20011027202726.A61277@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:36:58AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > Andrew Gallatin writes: > > > > > > Building now. One more question I have CPUTYPE=ev56 > > > in /etc/make.conf -- will the crossbuild see this, potentially > > > confusing the x86 gcc? > > > > Yes, it will.. : > > > > cc1: bad value (ev56) for -mcpu= switch > > > > Removing ev56 & restarting... > > > This is because Makefile.inc1 sets CFLAGS="-nostdinc ${CFLAGS}" in > CROSSENV, and that imports currently effective (for host architecture) > CFLAGS. This is bogus. The attached patch should fix it. Please > test. The problem referred to in rev.105 (that setting CFLAGS in Makefile.inc1 doesn't always work because it may be clobbered by the setting in /etc/make.conf) is still there. > Bruce, what do you think about bringing COPTFLAGS in userland, > and adding CINCLUDES? I think new names in the "application namespace" shouldn't be used in sys.mk. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011029045531.R5004-100000>