From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun May 6 1: 2:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from pluto.runbox.com (pluto.runbox.com [193.71.199.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF6837B43C for ; Sun, 6 May 2001 01:02:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from satanmode@runbox.com) Received: from [203.195.134.208] (helo=runbox.com) by pluto.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14wJV1-0008Ju-00; Sun, 06 May 2001 10:02:43 +0200 Message-ID: <3AF50686.F09BBDD5@runbox.com> Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 13:38:38 +0530 From: Aman X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" Cc: "Sandeep (ROCK MAN)" , Jaswinder Singh Kohli Subject: squeeze freeBSDs' kernel size Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG kldstat shows the kernel as a loaded module. does it mean the kernel after getting in the core is resident to it's complete physical size. my question is, does the pagedaemon carry out any sort of paging or segmentation on the kernel and it's loadable modules though the latter seems necessary. how much size can be really squeezed out of the kernel Regards Aman satanmode@runbox.com ------------------------------------------------------------------- Those who do not understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it poorly. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message