Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Feb 2001 00:15:48 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        needle-mls@world-online.no
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: libcrypto hosed when compiled with optimizations
Message-ID:  <20010225001548.A11897@mollari.cthul.hu>
In-Reply-To: <20010225012956.A1726@resentment.verloid.net>; from needle-mls@world-online.no on Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 01:29:56AM %2B0100
References:  <20010225012956.A1726@resentment.verloid.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 01:29:56AM +0100, needle-mls@world-online.no wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> On my 4.2-stable system I have tweaked my /etc/make.conf to compile
> sources with -O -mcpu=3D686 -march=3Dpentiumpro -funroll-loops and as
                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Don't do that then.  Also note that -march implies -mcpu for the
gcc/i386 compiler (alpha is different, it doesn't have -march)

> Has anyone done any testing which shows that things actually run
> faster, or are the binaries just more likely to be flawed?

Both.  Some things work and are faster when you go above -O, some are
faster and don't work :-)

Kris

--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6mL8zWry0BWjoQKURAvT9AKDXi2tMvgQ+q24OGS+n3jPlua1BzQCguS0k
TgmRJ76KA7Qn1GD2m06cOqw=
=Kpbi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010225001548.A11897>