From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 31 0: 2:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (dhcp45-24.dis.org [216.240.45.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF72B37B417; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 00:02:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2V81Dc03587; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 00:01:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200203310801.g2V81Dc03587@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Terry Lambert Cc: Michael Smith , Alfred Perlstein , scott_long@btc.adaptec.com, mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com, obrien@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: asr can not map memory? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Mar 2002 23:56:28 PST." <3CA6C12C.3A2B57D1@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 00:01:12 -0800 From: Michael Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > What's the basis of the assumption that the I/O range is > unsupported in the first place, and why isn't it true for this > bridge chip, if it's a valid assumption for others? The information was provided in the debugging output and code that Alfred supplied in earlier messages. The short answer is "programmer error". You're walking into another conversation with insufficient context. 8) -- To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. - Theodore Roosevelt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message