From owner-freebsd-gnome Sun Nov 24 6:52:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4B237B401; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 06:52:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985E843E9C; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 06:52:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gAOEqGTJ053316; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 17:52:16 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 17:52:16 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Kent Stewart Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Subject: Re: Port INDEX dependency list incompletes In-Reply-To: <3DDFCA8A.40104@owt.com> Message-ID: <20021124174916.Q57190-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Kent Stewart wrote: KS> You can't use "portsdb -U" right now. You have to KS> KS> cd /usr/ports KS> make index KS> portsdb -u Actually, you can, but you have to be a bit lucky ;) My sub-port collection contains approx 350 ports, and portsdb -U fails in roughly 50% of runs. Unfortunately, portsdb -U did not even return non-zero exit status for this weird case And, for the cause, I'm almost sure it is due to some intercommunications with bsd.gnome.mk, as *every* sub-port collection without gnome ports survives portsdb -U every time. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message