From owner-freebsd-libh Mon Dec 16 10:52:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643BC37B401 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:52:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.qc.uunet.ca (mail1.qc.uunet.ca [198.168.54.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DDA43ED8 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:52:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anarcat@espresso-com.com) Received: from xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com ([216.94.147.57]) by mail1.qc.uunet.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id gBGIqhZ21104 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:52:44 -0500 Received: from anarcat by xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18O0M9-0000cL-00 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:52:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:52:45 -0500 From: The Anarcat To: libh@freebsd.org Subject: libh repo temporarly offline Message-ID: <20021216185244.GB471@xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've moved the cvs repo so no commit are done to it while I restore from the backup. I'll make sure it's intact by diffing it against the current copy. Everything should be back to normal in a few minutes A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Mon Dec 16 11: 5:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2095C37B401 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:05:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.qc.uunet.ca (mail2.qc.uunet.ca [198.168.54.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3518243E4A for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:05:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anarcat@espresso-com.com) Received: from xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com ([216.94.147.57]) by mail2.qc.uunet.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16459 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:05:38 -0500 Received: from anarcat by xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18O0Yd-0000di-00 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:05:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:05:39 -0500 From: The Anarcat To: Libh Subject: HEADS UP: libh repo reverted to december 11th Message-ID: <20021216190539.GC471@xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com> Mail-Followup-To: The Anarcat , Libh Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! I reverted the libh CVS repository to what its state was on december 11th. I've made a backup of the old repo in ~libh/backup/. There you can also find the tarball used to restore the repo: # md5 libh-cvs.tar.gz.5 MD5 (libh-cvs.tar.gz.5) =3D ef3f6af7201337fa8b62e0af4be006f3 # ls -l libh-cvs.tar.gz.5 -r-------- 1 xxxxxx xxxxxx 5867271 11 d=E9c 03:01 libh-cvs.tar.gz.5 So Max, you can now commit those changes you had sleeping, but please, one at the time! :) Cheers, A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Tue Dec 17 1:53:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313ED37B401 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:53:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E9343ED8 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:53:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from libh@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gBH9voCA019173 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 04:57:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from libh@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org) Received: (from libh@localhost) by triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gBH9vo3p019172 for libh@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 04:57:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 04:57:50 -0500 (EST) From: LibH owner Message-Id: <200212170957.gBH9vo3p019172@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> Subject: cvs commit: libh/tools/scripts build_dep To: freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG libh 2002/12/17 04:57:50 EST Modified files: tools/scripts build_dep Log: Add support for gcc32 and gcc31 Revision Changes Path 1.6 +6 -6 libh/tools/scripts/build_dep To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Tue Dec 17 2:12:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286C437B401 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:12:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915B743EC2 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:12:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from libh@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gBHAGPCA019296 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 05:16:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from libh@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org) Received: (from libh@localhost) by triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gBHAGOjH019295 for libh@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 05:16:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 05:16:24 -0500 (EST) From: LibH owner Message-Id: <200212171016.gBHAGOjH019295@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> Subject: cvs commit: libh/tools/bm Path.hh BuildMake.cc BuildMake.hh Exceptions.hh Library.cc Library.hh MakeDependency.hh MakeVariable.hh Module.cc Module.hh ObjectCollection.cc ObjectCollection.hh Program.cc Program.hh TODO bm.1 main.cc To: freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG libh 2002/12/17 05:16:24 EST Modified files: tools/bm BuildMake.cc BuildMake.hh Exceptions.hh Library.cc Library.hh MakeDependency.hh MakeVariable.hh Module.cc Module.hh ObjectCollection.cc ObjectCollection.hh Program.cc Program.hh TODO bm.1 main.cc Added files: tools/bm Path.hh Log: Port to gcc 3.x compilers by using proper namespace directives. Revision Changes Path 1.7 +46 -56 libh/tools/bm/BuildMake.cc 1.6 +29 -22 libh/tools/bm/BuildMake.hh 1.3 +8 -5 libh/tools/bm/Exceptions.hh 1.7 +14 -96 libh/tools/bm/Library.cc 1.6 +6 -15 libh/tools/bm/Library.hh 1.5 +80 -54 libh/tools/bm/MakeDependency.hh 1.5 +71 -50 libh/tools/bm/MakeVariable.hh 1.8 +148 -142 libh/tools/bm/Module.cc 1.9 +33 -86 libh/tools/bm/Module.hh 1.11 +263 -116 libh/tools/bm/ObjectCollection.cc 1.10 +63 -117 libh/tools/bm/ObjectCollection.hh 1.6 +22 -108 libh/tools/bm/Program.cc 1.8 +6 -15 libh/tools/bm/Program.hh 1.6 +4 -4 libh/tools/bm/TODO 1.2 +1 -1 libh/tools/bm/bm.1 1.6 +73 -55 libh/tools/bm/main.cc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Tue Dec 17 2:16:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFE137B401 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:16:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from postal.sdsc.edu (postal.sdsc.edu [132.249.20.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAFC43EC5 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:16:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from okumoto@ucsd.edu) Received: from multivac.sdsc.edu (IDENT:MV1Pyxf596T6UlapxqpdDFeDzqCpSWu3@multivac.sdsc.edu [132.249.20.57]) by postal.sdsc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6/server/50) with ESMTP id gBHAGb114313; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:16:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by multivac (8.11.6+Sun/1.11-SolarisClient) id gBHAGaU09783; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:16:36 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: libh/tools/scripts build_dep References: <200212170957.gBH9vo3p019172@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> From: Max Okumoto Date: 17 Dec 2002 02:16:36 -0800 In-Reply-To: <200212170957.gBH9vo3p019172@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> Message-ID: Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It looks like something is still not fixed with CVS since The two most recent patches should have had my name on them. Max LibH owner writes: > libh 2002/12/17 04:57:50 EST > > Modified files: > tools/scripts build_dep > Log: > Add support for gcc32 and gcc31 > > Revision Changes Path > 1.6 +6 -6 libh/tools/scripts/build_dep > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Tue Dec 17 2:21:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A1637B401 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:21:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F215343EA9 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:21:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from libh@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gBHAPfCA019337 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 05:25:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from libh@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org) Received: (from libh@localhost) by triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gBHAPfBl019336 for libh@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 05:25:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 05:25:41 -0500 (EST) From: LibH owner Message-Id: <200212171025.gBHAPfBl019336@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> Subject: cvs commit: libh Makefile.bm To: freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG libh 2002/12/17 05:25:41 EST Modified files: . Makefile.bm Log: Check in newly generated bm boot strap Makefile fragment. Revision Changes Path 1.2 +15 -19 libh/Makefile.bm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Thu Dec 19 14:18: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D1837B401 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:18:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from postal.sdsc.edu (postal.sdsc.edu [132.249.20.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE4C43EA9 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:18:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from okumoto@ucsd.edu) Received: from multivac.sdsc.edu (IDENT:b5Cbwiaqy1Fb6MhfGF6gX4tE1ymjPWeM@multivac.sdsc.edu [132.249.20.57]) by postal.sdsc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6/server/50) with ESMTP id gBJMI1125139; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:18:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by multivac (8.11.6+Sun/1.11-SolarisClient) id gBJMHxG06105; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:17:59 -0800 (PST) To: libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: What are are you devel on? From: Max Okumoto Date: 19 Dec 2002 14:17:59 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20021213215759.GC2175@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> Message-ID: Lines: 38 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What are peoples build enviornments for libh? Right now I am on the follownig: OS FreeBSD4.7 compiler gcc2.95.4 libs: qt2-static (gcc2.95.4) qt23 (gcc2.95.4) tvision-0.8 (gcc2.95.4) alt setup on same machine (build in subdir of my libh directory) qt2-static (gcc32) qt23 (gcc32) tvision-0.8 (gcc32) I have compiled gcc32 and have built the other libraries, but have run into problems with conflicts qt30 can not build with qt23 installed (Note: qt30 in ports only builds a share library) tvision-0.8 does not compile with gcc32. (Note; I have a patch for this... but I have not done extensive tests with it yet.) Are we planning on going to qt30 and how are we going to handle the share vs static linking issue? Do we want our own copy of tvision until I can find who maintains the ports version. Or are we planing on moving to rhtvision? Do we want to GPL libh? So what are you guys using/not using? Max Okumoto To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Thu Dec 19 14:42: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5912537B401 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:42:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from 21322530218.direct.eti.at (21322530218.direct.eti.at [213.225.30.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C32A43EA9 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:41:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tilman@arved.de) Received: from huckfinn.arved.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 21322530218.direct.eti.at (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gBJMgxNP012416; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:43:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tilman@arved.de) Received: (from tilman@localhost) by huckfinn.arved.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id gBJMgx6d012415; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:42:59 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: huckfinn.arved.de: tilman set sender to tilman@arved.de using -f Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:42:59 +0100 From: Tilman Linneweh To: Max Okumoto Cc: libh@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What are are you devel on? Message-ID: <20021219224258.GA12070@huckfinn.arved.de> Reply-To: replyto@arved.de References: <20021213215759.GC2175@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In arved.freebsd.libh, you wrote: > Right now I am on the follownig: > OS FreeBSD4.7 > compiler gcc2.95.4 > libs: > qt2-static (gcc2.95.4) > qt23 (gcc2.95.4) > tvision-0.8 (gcc2.95.4) >=20 > alt setup on same machine (build in subdir of my libh directory) > qt2-static (gcc32) > qt23 (gcc32) > tvision-0.8 (gcc32) >=20 > I have compiled gcc32 and have built the other libraries, but > have run into problems with conflicts >=20 > qt30 can not build with qt23 installed > (Note: qt30 in ports only builds a share library) Because of this incompatibility, the kde-freebsd people would like to push = people to port their apps to qt3, so that qt2* can be removed, as soon no major app d= epends on it.=20 >=20 > tvision-0.8 does not compile with gcc32. > (Note; I have a patch for this... but I have not done > extensive tests with it yet.) If you have patches, please submit them, since the port is currently marked= broken on 5.0=20 > Are we planning on going to qt30 and how are we going to handle the > share vs static linking issue? >=20 > Do we want our own copy of tvision until I can find who maintains the > ports version. Or are we planing on moving to rhtvision? Do we > want to GPL libh? The tvision port is currently unmaintained, perhaps maintainer should be pa= ssed to=20 libh@freebsd.org? Last, although I have no clue about this project and am only lurking on the= Mailinglist, why do you want to GPL? We are BSD! regards arved To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Thu Dec 19 14:51: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DA737B401 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:51:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (fump.kawo2.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.181.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120F743EDA for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:51:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alex@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de) Received: from fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gBJMp6Uf055603; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:51:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from alex@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de) Received: (from alex@localhost) by fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id gBJMp5gD055602; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:51:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:51:05 +0100 From: Alexander Langer To: LibH owner Cc: freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: libh/tools/bm Path.hh BuildMake.cc BuildMake.hh Exceptions.hh Library.cc Library.hh MakeDependency.hh MakeVariable.hh Module.cc Module.hh ObjectCollection.cc ObjectCollection.hh Program.cc Program.hh TODO bm.1 main.cc Message-ID: <20021219225104.GS48748@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> References: <200212171016.gBHAGOjH019295@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200212171016.gBHAGOjH019295@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> X-PGP-at: finger alex@big.endian.de X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake LibH owner (libh@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org): > Port to gcc 3.x compilers by using proper namespace directives. Nice! Well done :-) Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Thu Dec 19 15:47:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC2E37B401 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:47:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from postal.sdsc.edu (postal.sdsc.edu [132.249.20.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083AB43EDC for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:47:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from okumoto@ucsd.edu) Received: from multivac.sdsc.edu (IDENT:DPtgEALhKsk+Drg54APyShT+akniiCCT@multivac.sdsc.edu [132.249.20.57]) by postal.sdsc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6/server/50) with ESMTP id gBJNla110134; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:47:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by multivac (8.11.6+Sun/1.11-SolarisClient) id gBJNlZO14438; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:47:35 -0800 (PST) To: replyto@arved.de Cc: libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What are are you devel on? References: <20021213215759.GC2175@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <20021219224258.GA12070@huckfinn.arved.de> From: Max Okumoto Date: 19 Dec 2002 15:47:35 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20021219224258.GA12070@huckfinn.arved.de> Message-ID: Lines: 54 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Tilman Linneweh writes: [ stuff deleted] > Because of this incompatibility, the kde-freebsd people would like > to push people to port their apps to qt3, so that qt2* can be removed, > as soon no major app depends on it. The problem is that the libh binary need to be staticly linked. So we need them to create the static libraries. > > > > tvision-0.8 does not compile with gcc32. > > (Note; I have a patch for this... but I have not done > > extensive tests with it yet.) > > If you have patches, please submit them, since the port is currently > marked broken on 5.0 Its has not been tested... and depending on the answer to the later questions I may clean it up or drop it. Does anyone else want/need tvision? > > Are we planning on going to qt30 and how are we going to handle the > > share vs static linking issue? > > > > Do we want our own copy of tvision until I can find who maintains the > > ports version. Or are we planing on moving to rhtvision? Do we > > want to GPL libh? > > The tvision port is currently unmaintained, perhaps maintainer should > be passed to libh@freebsd.org? Who would we talk to about this? Do we want to do this? :-) > Last, although I have no clue about this project and am only lurking > on the Mailinglist, why do you want to GPL? We are BSD! I am sure the rhtvision library is GPL. http://tvision.sourceforge.net/#wcp What about copyrights? The original code is copyrighted by Borland but is freely available from the net. Try here. This port is distributed under the GPL license and the Sigala's port under a BSD like license. [stuff deleted] Which is why I am asking. Max [stuff delete] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Fri Dec 20 2: 0:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A1B37B401 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 02:00:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from 21322530218.direct.eti.at (21322530218.direct.eti.at [213.225.30.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB1443EEC for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 02:00:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tilman@arved.de) Received: from huckfinn.arved.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 21322530218.direct.eti.at (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gBKA1ZNP024269; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:01:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tilman@arved.de) Received: (from tilman@localhost) by huckfinn.arved.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id gBKA1XUR024268; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:01:33 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: huckfinn.arved.de: tilman set sender to tilman@arved.de using -f Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:01:31 +0100 From: Tilman Linneweh To: Max Okumoto Cc: libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are are you devel on? Message-ID: <20021220100131.GA23780@huckfinn.arved.de> Reply-To: replyto@arved.de References: <20021213215759.GC2175@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In arved.freebsd.libh, you wrote: >> Because of this incompatibility, the kde-freebsd people would like >> to push people to port their apps to qt3, so that qt2* can be removed, >> as soon no major app depends on it.=20 >=20 > The problem is that the libh binary need to be staticly linked. So > we need them to create the static libraries. If someone submits a slave port like the qt23-static. I'll look at it. libh seems to be the only port, that needs a static library. But if you are seriously planning to move to qt3, a static version should be added. = =20 =20 >> >=20 >> > tvision-0.8 does not compile with gcc32. >> > (Note; I have a patch for this... but I have not done >> > extensive tests with it yet.) >>=20 >> If you have patches, please submit them, since the port is currently >> marked broken on 5.0 >=20 > Its has not been tested... and depending on the answer to the later > questions I may clean it up or drop it. Does anyone else want/need > tvision? libh seems to be the only port that uses tvision. If your patches are fixing the build on 5.0 and are not breaking the port= =20 on STABLE, go ahead and make them public :).=20 >=20 >> > Are we planning on going to qt30 and how are we going to handle the >> > share vs static linking issue? >> >=20 >> > Do we want our own copy of tvision until I can find who maintains the >> > ports version. Or are we planing on moving to rhtvision? Do we >> > want to GPL libh? >>=20 >> The tvision port is currently unmaintained, perhaps maintainer should >> be passed to libh@freebsd.org? >=20 > Who would we talk to about this? Do we want to do this? :-) I was just asking, since you are the only people that use the port, you pro= bably want to review patches to the port. > The original code is copyrighted by Borland but is freely available from > the net. Try here. This port is distributed under the GPL license and > the Sigala's port under a BSD like license. [stuff deleted] >=20 > Which is why I am asking. Sorry, didn't know that. I'll hide under my stone again. But i would prefer using tvision because of the license. regards arved --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+Aup6fCLDn4B6xToRAlfeAJ49Sk+OWuKyWUc21WTjx+HQ01iGewCePw42 RkhlkPx86SIemzWtAlAkTQo= =UYei -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Fri Dec 20 14: 6:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F1737B401 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:06:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from aeimail.aei.ca (aeimail.aei.ca [206.123.6.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AADD43EE8 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:06:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx) Received: from shall.anarcat.ath.cx (gjmbc02hwni0t1q9@dsl-134-52.aei.ca [66.36.134.52]) by aeimail.aei.ca (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id gBKM6RB26024; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:06:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by shall.anarcat.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CA61220B; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:06:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:06:25 -0500 From: The Anarcat To: Max Okumoto Cc: libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What are are you devel on? Message-ID: <20021220220625.GD58708@shall.anarcat.ath.cx> References: <20021213215759.GC2175@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! I've committed a set of patches to the libh source tree to make libh link against rhtvision while tvision doesn't compile in -current. I didn't touch the parts of Hui you committed (lib/Hui, lib/HuiTv, lib/HuiQt). I don't like rhtvision very much. It links against X11 which defeats its purpose completely, IMHO. As much as we can, we should try to stick with tvision. Also note the head of the Makefile.inc file: .include "Makefile.version" .if ${OSVERSION} < 500035 CC= gcc31 CXX= g++31 BUILD_DEPENDS+= gcc31:${PORTSDIR}/lang/gcc31 MAKE_ENV+= CC=${CC} CXX=${CXX} .endif So libh now compiles with GCC 3.1 by default. This is to make libh compilable under -current. Alex and I worked out the transition pretty smoothly. Overall, I think we should develop under -current and keep -current as the primary target system for libh, since libh isn't likely to be deployed on the (soon to be retired) -stable branch. However, I've been saying that'd be switching to -current for months without doing it by lack of time. :) I'm ambivalent WRT Qt. I guess we should follow the trend and upgrade. I don't think creating a slave static port for qt3 should be much of a problem. As an aside, we shouldn't technically need the static Qt libraries to statically link against it. We should fix dynamic linking instead of looking at static Qt. But this is just wishing. :) Max, if you've got patches to make tvision compile under -current, I'm pretty sure ports@freebsd.org would be interested. Alex could probably commit them if they get approved. In other words, no one is maintaining tvision. We could assume maintainership since we're pretty much the only consumers of the port. :) I'd be curious to see if libh could compile against a shared qt. I know that it used to need the static port, but I'm not sure it's still true. I don't have much time to work on libh these days. I'll be leaving town for 2 weeks on december 23rd but I'll probably take a look at all this after. :) Cheers! A. On Thu Dec 19, 2002 at 02:17:59PM -0800, Max Okumoto wrote: > > What are peoples build enviornments for libh? > > Right now I am on the follownig: > OS FreeBSD4.7 > compiler gcc2.95.4 > libs: > qt2-static (gcc2.95.4) > qt23 (gcc2.95.4) > tvision-0.8 (gcc2.95.4) > > alt setup on same machine (build in subdir of my libh directory) > qt2-static (gcc32) > qt23 (gcc32) > tvision-0.8 (gcc32) > > I have compiled gcc32 and have built the other libraries, but > have run into problems with conflicts > > qt30 can not build with qt23 installed > (Note: qt30 in ports only builds a share library) > > tvision-0.8 does not compile with gcc32. > (Note; I have a patch for this... but I have not done > extensive tests with it yet.) > > > Are we planning on going to qt30 and how are we going to handle the > share vs static linking issue? > > Do we want our own copy of tvision until I can find who maintains the > ports version. Or are we planing on moving to rhtvision? Do we > want to GPL libh? > > So what are you guys using/not using? > > Max Okumoto > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Fri Dec 20 14:16:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029E537B401 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:16:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from aeimail.aei.ca (aeimail.aei.ca [206.123.6.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED2243EEC for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:16:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx) Received: from shall.anarcat.ath.cx (a987y72cnu4j0eln@dsl-134-52.aei.ca [66.36.134.52]) by aeimail.aei.ca (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id gBKMGQB01495; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:16:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by shall.anarcat.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3A34820B; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:16:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:16:25 -0500 From: The Anarcat To: Tilman Linneweh Cc: Max Okumoto , libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are are you devel on? Message-ID: <20021220221625.GE58708@shall.anarcat.ath.cx> References: <20021213215759.GC2175@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <20021220100131.GA23780@huckfinn.arved.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021220100131.GA23780@huckfinn.arved.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri Dec 20, 2002 at 11:01:31AM +0100, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > In arved.freebsd.libh, you wrote: > > >> The tvision port is currently unmaintained, perhaps maintainer should > >> be passed to libh@freebsd.org? > > > > Who would we talk to about this? Do we want to do this? :-) > > I was just asking, since you are the only people that use the port, you probably > want to review patches to the port. Yep. Thinking again about this, I'd really like to have maintainership of the port, since recent changes (the 0.8 upgrade, in particular) totally broke tvision and no one but us noticed. :) > > The original code is copyrighted by Borland but is freely available from > > the net. Try here. This port is distributed under the GPL license and > > the Sigala's port under a BSD like license. [stuff deleted] > > > > Which is why I am asking. > > Sorry, didn't know that. I'll hide under my stone again. > But i would prefer using tvision because of the license. I think there's been some confusion here. The text max quoted is from http://tvision.sf.net/. But this is the rhtvision port. The tvision port is exactly that, the Sigala's port. So if we can revert back to tvision as I wish, everything will be well. In the meantime, rhtivision is a workable replacement, however bad it is. But it is clear in my mind that we cannot package libh linking against rhtvision without modifications to rhtvision, since it links uselessly against X11. I just ported libh to rhtvision in order to unbreak it completely under -current. A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-libh Fri Dec 20 14:17:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E2C37B401 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:17:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from aeimail.aei.ca (aeimail.aei.ca [206.123.6.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D248B43ED8 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:17:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx) Received: from shall.anarcat.ath.cx (8ixxp031l1zebg59@dsl-134-52.aei.ca [66.36.134.52]) by aeimail.aei.ca (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id gBKMHOB02026; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by shall.anarcat.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D17C20B; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:17:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:17:23 -0500 From: The Anarcat To: Max Okumoto Cc: freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: libh/tools/scripts build_dep Message-ID: <20021220221723.GF58708@shall.anarcat.ath.cx> Mail-Followup-To: The Anarcat , Max Okumoto , freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200212170957.gBH9vo3p019172@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I can't work on that right now, unfortunatly. Alex, do you have some time to spare on some CVS magic? A. On Tue Dec 17, 2002 at 02:16:36AM -0800, Max Okumoto wrote: > > It looks like something is still not fixed with CVS since > The two most recent patches should have had my name on them. > > Max > > LibH owner writes: > > > libh 2002/12/17 04:57:50 EST > > > > Modified files: > > tools/scripts build_dep > > Log: > > Add support for gcc32 and gcc31 > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.6 +6 -6 libh/tools/scripts/build_dep > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message