Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 03:16:08 -0100 From: ".VWV." <victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: kernels' weight Message-ID: <200305260316.08916.victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi to all. I would like to post a question. We know Linux is the son of the microkernel Minix. Linux kernel is simple= and=20 light, but its compilation is complicate, owing to the need of a lot of=20 modules, and to the difference between several distributions. It is much=20 easier to compile a FreeBSD kernel, even if it needs some megabyte more. = If=20 we can compress the kernel following the instruction on the Dossier books= ,=20 who cares of its original weight? Once I know how to compile the FreeBSD kernel and how to write the file=20 'fstab', I can quite dominate my operating system - moreover, the=20 partitioning system is much more advanced -. I'm running FreeBSD as the main administration of a pair of workstations.= I=20 have no needs as for networks. Please forgive me if I'm writing from a de= ad=20 Linux installation, I have no time to learn the network commands on FreeB= SD,=20 whilst building my complicate hardwares... I have never liked the chaotic and competitive world of 'penguins', I'm p= roud=20 of learning the only unix with FreeBSD. Live Berkeley or die VITTORI
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305260316.08916.victorvittorivonwiktow>