From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 29 05:30:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE8237B401 for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 05:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp03.web.de [217.72.192.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76A243FAF for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 05:30:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from manfred.lotz@web.de) Received: from [213.23.213.219] (helo=wizard.sanskrit.local.net) by smtp.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (WEB.DE 4.98 #232) id 19WbKN-0003Dv-00 for freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:30:43 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])h5TCUf1q002170 for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:30:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from manfred.lotz@web.de) From: Manfred Lotz To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:30:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306291430.41237.manfred.lotz@web.de> Sender: manfred.lotz@web.de Subject: sbp0:0:0 No ocb(260d628c) on the queue X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Vendors pre-release coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:30:45 -0000 Hi there, I have the following firewire controller: fwohci0: port 0xc800-0xc87f mem 0xea004000-0xea0047ff irq 3 at devi ce 12.0 on pci0 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channel is 8. fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:06:00:00:00:4a:1d fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 It works quite good with an IBM disk although I also get ack err messages from tiem to time. However when connecting a 80 GB Seagate disk and copying to the mounted partition I get lots of messages like this: sbp0:0:0 No ocb(260d628c) on the queue When booting from my rescue CD (FreeBSD 5.0 Current, created in April) the copy process seems to work fine despite the "No ocb..."-messages. When copying from my current desktop system FreeBSD 5.1 Release I additionally get kenel panics, e.g. ffs_valloc: dup alloc. In all cases: If I do a fsck this works fine. No complaints from teh firewire point of view. What should I do to get more meaningful informations which I can provide to the developer when making a bugreport? Can I assume to be fine with FreeBSD 4.8 STABLE? Manfred From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 30 05:19:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86E537B404 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from post.webmailer.de (natsmtp01.webmailer.de [192.67.198.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5062543FE0 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:19:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de) Received: from hermes2.uwskoeln.de (sys-82.netsystec.de [194.8.213.82] (may be forged)) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id h5UCJHFg019963 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:19:18 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [192.168.8.25] (helo=uw-service.de) by hermes2.uwskoeln.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19Wxco-0007AW-00 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:19:14 +0200 Received: from hoffmann.uwskoeln.de by uw-service.de with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.5.R) for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:20:05 +0200 From: Oliver Hoffmann To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:18:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306301418.03705.oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de> X-Return-Path: oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Subject: Very odd problems. X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Vendors pre-release coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:19:22 -0000 Hi list! My attempt is to make backups to external firewire-hds, because they are much cheaper and faster than tapes. I have two servers which are almost identical. The first one has FreeBSD 4.8 Release running on an Athlon1000 with an Asus board. Two ICP-Vortex controller with two raids (both 42 GB, level 5) are attached. fw-card is the Texas Instruments TSB12LV26. I connected an external 5.25" case (probably oxford 911, but I couldn't find it out) with an mobilerack inside. In this rack is a wd80 (wd800BB-00CAA1) harddisk. This system works (I would say 90% stable). The second one runs FreeBSD 4.8-RC1 on an Athlon 1500+ with an Abit motherboard. It has one ICP with a bigger raid (ca. 200 GB, level 5). Hence the external harddisks have 160 GB (Maxtor 6Y160PO). All the firewire-parts are the same. That means the main differences are the hardisks and the FreeBSD-relaease. Btw, I had to take 4.8, because there isn't a support for vortex-controller in 5.0. This second server has permanently errors and sometimes automatically reboots or it crashes. I can see such errors (plenty of them) in the logs: /kernel: sbp0:0:0 Obj: Data buffer, Error: Time-out error /kernel: Unknown service addr 0x000000f0:0x16e800f0 tcode=5 /kernel: sbp0:0:0 request timeout ... agent reset I do the backups with simple shell-scripts: /sbin/kldload firewire /bin/sleep 10 /sbin/kldload sbp /bin/sleep 60 /sbin/fsck -y /dev/da1s1e /bin/sleep 20 /sbin/mount /dev/da1s1e /mnt/fw /bin/sleep 60 /bin/cp -R /mnt/raid1 /mnt/fw /bin/df -h /bin/sleep 240 /sbin/umount /dev/da1s1e /bin/sleep 60 /sbin/kldunload sbp /bin/sleep 60 /sbin/kldunload firewire /sbin/kldstat Maybe I exaggerated with the sleeptimes, but too short causes definitely problems. If the system reboots, it always does it after everything is copied. I hope that somebody can help me to get my system reasonabily working. Thanks for any help in advance! Regards, Oliver. From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 04:40:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3341037B401 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 04:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from post.webmailer.de (natsmtp01.webmailer.de [192.67.198.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADFD43FCB for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 04:40:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de) Received: from hermes2.uwskoeln.de (sys-82.netsystec.de [194.8.213.82] (may be forged)) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id h62BePqi006103 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 13:40:26 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [192.168.8.25] (helo=uw-service.de) by hermes2.uwskoeln.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19XfyL-0005pQ-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 13:40:26 +0200 Received: from hoffmann.uwskoeln.de by uw-service.de with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.5.R) for ; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 13:40:48 +0200 From: Oliver Hoffmann To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 13:38:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307021338.18065.oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de> X-Return-Path: oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Subject: 5.1-Release saved my day! X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Vendors pre-release coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 11:40:35 -0000 Hi list! I made a brave step and installed 5.1-Release. The firewire support is much much better now ;) and fortunately the raid works fine as well. Means all my problems are solved. I hope I didn't bother you. Greets, Oliver. From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 05:48:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B00A37B404 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 05:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from is2.mh.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (is2.mh.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0407343FBD for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 05:48:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp) Received: from is2.mh.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (is2.mh.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) by is2.mh.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218F937837A for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 21:47:58 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhosting.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (IDENT:mirapoint@mailhosting.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.205.3]) h62ClvmZ000439; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 21:47:57 +0900 Received: from ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.135.3])3.3.5-GR) with ESMTP id AJD69491; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 21:47:57 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 21:47:56 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hidetoshi Shimokawa To: Oliver Hoffmann In-Reply-To: <200307021338.18065.oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de> References: <200307021338.18065.oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.0 (Wonderwall) REMI/1.14.3 (Matsudai) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 8) (Honest Recruiter) (i386--freebsd) X-Face: OE([KxWyJI0r[R~S/>7ia}SJ)i%a,$-9%7{*yihQk|]gl}2p#"oXmX/fT}Bn7: #j7i14gu$jgR\S*&C3R/pJX List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 12:48:01 -0000 At Wed, 2 Jul 2003 13:38:18 +0200, Oliver Hoffmann wrote: > > Hi list! > > I made a brave step and installed 5.1-Release. The firewire support is much > much better now ;) and fortunately the raid works fine as well. Means all my > problems are solved. > I hope I didn't bother you. > Greets, > > Oliver. I'm glad to hear that. I think you don't need to unload sbp/firewire modules after backup finished. If you are interested in a faster backup method, ufs snapshot and ufs_copy would help you. You can find ufs_copy at: http://people.freebsd.org/~simokawa/ufs/ /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa \/ simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp PGP public key: http://www.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~simokawa/pgp.html From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 07:03:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E803137B401 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 07:03:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from maltanet.net (mailer2.maltanet.net [194.158.37.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A3E43FFD for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 07:03:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peterk@maltanet.net) Received: (qmail 22811 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2003 14:03:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.maltanet.net) ([194.158.37.235]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Jul 2003 14:03:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary X-Mailer: EMUmail 4.0 X-Originating-Ip: 80.85.96.2 X-Webmail-User: peterk@maltanet.net To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Http_host: webmail.maltanet.net From: Peter Korsten Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 15:10:10 CET Message-Id: <20030702140341.86A3E43FFD@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: Does VIA 6306 chipset work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Peter Korsten List-Id: Vendors pre-release coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 14:03:43 -0000 Hi, Before I part with my money, will a card (Q-Tec 510F) with the VIA 6306 chipset work well with 5.1-RELEASE? I can't find this information anywhere on the net, and I'm pretty sure it didn't come up on this list. Thanks, - Peter -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Birthdays? Anniversaries? Send a gift online from http://shop.di-ve.com . FREE DELIVERY TO MALTA ADDRESSES From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 4 04:04:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD0C37B401 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 04:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from post.webmailer.de (natsmtp01.webmailer.de [192.67.198.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3857944015 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 04:04:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de) Received: from hermes2.uwskoeln.de (sys-82.netsystec.de [194.8.213.82] (may be forged)) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id h64B4bqi018210 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 13:04:40 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [192.168.8.25] (helo=uw-service.de) by hermes2.uwskoeln.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19YOMo-0002LT-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 13:04:38 +0200 Received: from hoffmann.uwskoeln.de by uw-service.de with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.5.R) for ; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 13:05:19 +0200 From: Oliver Hoffmann To: Hidetoshi Shimokawa Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 13:03:21 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <200307021338.18065.oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307041303.21727.oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de> X-Return-Path: oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.1-Release saved my day! X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Vendors pre-release coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 11:04:46 -0000 Hi all! > I'm glad to hear that. I think you don't need to unload sbp/firewire > modules after backup finished. It will be obsolete, since I'll upgrade my second server to 5.1 as well. > If you are interested in a faster backup method, ufs snapshot and > ufs_copy would help you. Yes, it sounds good. But I'm missing a few hints about the procedure of getting the software installed (compiled). I unpacked it to /usr/local/ufs_copy and made a make. Seems to be that something is missing: Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/local/ufs_copy cc -O -pipe -Wall -Wformat -c ufs_copy.c ufs_copy.c:56: libufs.h: No such file or directory ufs_copy.c:59: stdint.h: No such file or directory ufs_copy.c:79: syntax error before `total' ufs_copy.c:79: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `total' ufs_copy.c:79: warning: data definition has no type or storage class ufs_copy.c:159: syntax error before `fs_size' ufs_copy.c:160: warning: return-type defaults to `int' ufs_copy.c: In function `fs_size': ... and so on. What do I need to have before I try a "make" ? Thanks for help! Regards, Oliver. From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 4 06:18:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DED537B401 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 06:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from is1.mh.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (is1.mh.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.205.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EC943F85 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 06:18:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp) Received: from is1.mh.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (is1.mh.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) by is1.mh.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1F221824A for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 22:18:29 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhosting.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (IDENT:mirapoint@mailhosting.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.205.3]) h64DITBd019635; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 22:18:29 +0900 Received: from ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.135.3])3.3.5-GR) with ESMTP id AJE53428; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 22:18:28 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 22:18:28 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hidetoshi Shimokawa To: Oliver Hoffmann In-Reply-To: <200307041303.21727.oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de> References: <200307021338.18065.oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de> <200307041303.21727.oliver.hoffmann@uw-service.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.0 (Wonderwall) REMI/1.14.3 (Matsudai) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 8) (Honest Recruiter) (i386--freebsd) X-Face: OE([KxWyJI0r[R~S/>7ia}SJ)i%a,$-9%7{*yihQk|]gl}2p#"oXmX/fT}Bn7: #j7i14gu$jgR\S*&C3R/pJX List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 13:18:34 -0000 FreeBSD-5.1 should have liufs.h in /usr/include. It cannot be compiled on FreeBSD-4. If you have problem with compile, I put a static linked binary at: http://people.freebsd.org/~simokawa/ufs/ufs_copy which should work both on -stable and -current. /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa \/ simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp PGP public key: http://www.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~simokawa/pgp.html At Fri, 4 Jul 2003 13:03:21 +0200, Oliver Hoffmann wrote: > > Hi all! > > > I'm glad to hear that. I think you don't need to unload sbp/firewire > > modules after backup finished. > > It will be obsolete, since I'll upgrade my second server to 5.1 as well. > > > If you are interested in a faster backup method, ufs snapshot and > > ufs_copy would help you. > > Yes, it sounds good. But I'm missing a few hints about the procedure of > getting the software installed (compiled). I unpacked it to > /usr/local/ufs_copy and made a make. Seems to be that something is missing: > > Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/local/ufs_copy > cc -O -pipe -Wall -Wformat -c ufs_copy.c > ufs_copy.c:56: libufs.h: No such file or directory > ufs_copy.c:59: stdint.h: No such file or directory > ufs_copy.c:79: syntax error before `total' > ufs_copy.c:79: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `total' > ufs_copy.c:79: warning: data definition has no type or storage class > ufs_copy.c:159: syntax error before `fs_size' > ufs_copy.c:160: warning: return-type defaults to `int' > ufs_copy.c: In function `fs_size': > ... > and so on. > > What do I need to have before I try a "make" ? > > Thanks for help! > > Regards, > > Oliver. > >