From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 14 06:25:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01ED16A4CF for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 06:25:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpha.workingtechnology.co.uk (www.shavers.co.uk [81.109.162.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A9D43D35 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 06:25:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@shavers.co.uk) Received: from laptop (host213-123-251-200.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.123.251.200]) by alpha.workingtechnology.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 759752AB9D8 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:23:44 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <006201c3c24e$13b8c660$0300a8c0@laptop> From: "Andrew Edwards (Olympic Shaver Centre)" To: Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:25:08 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: linux-sun-jdk14 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:25:12 -0000 Hi guys, Probably a simple one due to my noobness and apologies if it's old ground. What are the implications of the current port requesting 1.4.2_02 and Sun distributing 1.4.2_03? Would a simple rename and ignore the md5 hash work as nothing is being compiled, merely installed? Looking at distinfo diffs it suggests the port is periodically updated to match but currently they are showing out of sync. What's the usual lead time for updates? Thanks, Andrew.