From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 08:08:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DE316A4C0 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 08:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cebu.visayan.com (CEBU.VISAYAN.COM [216.67.181.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96EF43FEA for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 08:08:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matt@visayan.com) Received: by cebu.visayan.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 76CB0E7236; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 09:08:45 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 09:08:45 -0600 From: Matt DeLapp To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030831150845.GA68431@cebu.visayan.com> References: <20030730172810.GD485@cebu.visayan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030730172810.GD485@cebu.visayan.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Sony Vaio PCGV505BX X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 15:08:48 -0000 On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:28:10AM -0600, Matt DeLapp wrote: > Anybody have this laptop working with FreeBSD? freebsd-mobile > archive is currently unavailable and a google search for > freebsd and this specific model doesn't find anything. for the archives 4.8-STABLE built-in fxp works doesn't see PCCARD or built-in wi 5.1-RELEASE built-in fxp works doesn't see PCCARD or built-in wi 5.1-CURRENT (cvsup 8/23/03 am) built-in fxp works PCCARD works (tested only with Orinoco card) built-in wi works From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 08:25:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF22A16A4BF for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 08:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.pipni.cz (mail.pipni.cz [195.39.35.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C2443FCB for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 08:25:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david.stastny@tritonus-tech.com) Received: (helo=tritonus-tech.com) id 19tU5L-00010b-6m for freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 17:25:47 +0200 From: "david.stastny" To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:25:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20030831151904.M59192@tritonus-tech.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.10 20030617 X-OriginatingIP: 212.20.99.101 (david.stastny@tritonus-tech.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Subject: Re: acer extensa, o2micro and ovislink pcmcia ethernet X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 15:25:49 -0000 Hi again, I've installed 5.1-release. When I insert my Ovislink Realtek 8139C-Based ethernet card, I receive a message: #cardbus0: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) #cbb0: CardBus card activation failed I guess I have to put some lines into /etc/pccard.conf, but I dont know how to get manufacturer and card name. I tried to run "pccardc dumpcis" and all I got was "0 slots found" Thank you for any hints. David From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 12:25:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C0E16A4BF for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 12:25:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sizone.org (mortar.sizone.org [65.126.154.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1677443FE9 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 12:25:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by sizone.org (Postfix, from userid 66) id 563AA3024E; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 15:25:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by canoe.velocet.net (Postfix, from userid 101) id AD5551D1CFD; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 15:25:22 -0400 (EDT) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16210.19361.961389.559545@canoe.velocet.net> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 15:25:21 -0400 To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1062096540.699.31.camel@gyros> References: <16206.19141.76818.531070@canoe.velocet.net> <1062096540.699.31.camel@gyros> X-Mailer: VM 7.14 under 21.4 (patch 12) "Portable Code" XEmacs Lucid cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org cc: David Gilbert Subject: Re: No mouse on Dell Inspirion 1100? X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:25:28 -0000 >>>>> "Joe" == Joe Marcus Clarke writes: Joe> On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 14:32, David Gilbert wrote: >> I just configured a Dell Inspirion 1100 laptop for a friend ... and >> this laptop has a built in touch pad ... much like my dell. It's >> running -CURRENT cvsup'd as of Monday. When it probes the mouse >> (full -v boot below), it get's this error (boot -v'd) >> >> pci0: at device 31.6 (no driver attached) unknown: >> not probed (disabled) psmcpnp0 irq 12 on acpi0 atkbdc0: > controller (i8042)> port 0x66,0x62,0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: >> flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 atkbd: the current kbd >> controller command byte 0065 atkbd: keyboard ID 0x41ab (2) kbd0 at >> atkbd0 kbd0: atkbd0, AT 101/102 (2), config:0x1, flags:0x3d0000 >> psm0: current command byte:0065 psm0: the aux port is not >> functioning (-1). unknown: not probed (disabled) >> >> I'm somewhat at a loss ... as I really don't know how to proceed. >> Help? Joe> Add the following to /boot/device.hints, then reboot: Joe> hint.psm.0.flags="0x1000" This did not work. A second suggestion that booting without ACPI might help did not work either. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================ From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 20:17:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664B716A4BF for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0977B43F93 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:17:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brucem128@comcast.net) Received: from comcast.net (pcp01489745pcs.limstn01.de.comcast.net[68.82.193.245]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <2003090103170901200233kse> (Authid: brucem128); Mon, 1 Sep 2003 03:17:09 +0000 Message-ID: <3F52DE26.3070301@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 00:50:30 -0500 From: Bruce Mackay User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030818 Thunderbird/0.2a X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Toshiba Wireless Lan Card problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 03:17:11 -0000 Hey all, I was wondering if some kind soul could help me get my Wireless net connection working. I am currently running FreeBSD 4.8 and whenever I try to start up my wi0 I keep getting "wi0: watchdog timeout" messages. Now I've searched around a bit and I've tried the following. I set hw.pcic.intr_path="1" in my loader.conf. I've tried setting my card to different irq's (set pccardd_flags="-I- i 9" in rc.conf, 9 seemed to be the only other free irq) but to no avail so it's back to being assigned to irq 3. When I grep through my dmesg, nothing else seems to be using irq 3 either, so I think that is ok. I use the following "ifconfig wi0 ssid my_net wep wepkey my_key inet 192.168.1.110 netmask 255.255.255.0". I try running "route add default 192.168.1.1", which seems to do very little. Anyone have any ideas what I'm missing? Also I tried connecting to my router through fxp0. I can ping 192.168.1.1 just fine but if I try to ping, say, yahoo.com I get a hostname lookup failure. This is my first time using FreeBSD so perhaps I've not configured my network properly? I don't know just throwing that out there. Thanks in advance, Bruce From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 20:20:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CFE16A4BF for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:20:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moo.sysabend.org (moo.sysabend.org [66.111.41.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E329343FFB for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:20:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ragnar@sysabend.org) Received: by moo.sysabend.org (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 1EF9C1327; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:20:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by moo.sysabend.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD731299; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:20:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:20:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Jamie Bowden To: Murad Mamedov In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030831201905.Y80387-100000@moo.sysabend.org> X-representing: Only myself. X-badge: We don't need no stinking badges. X-obligatory-profanity: Fuck X-moo: Moo. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wierd X issue. X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 03:20:37 -0000 On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Murad Mamedov wrote: > leave only this: > device sc ... > I think this is because of MAXCONS option, it's the only option we are > intersected. I got some more options regarding sc, but SC_PIXEL_MODE i > didn't set. ... > "Wierd X issue" is gone when i commented out all the options regarding > device sc. I don't know where is the bug and i don't have time to find it. I removed all options to sc, and indeed, X now works as expected. Thanks, Jamie Bowden -- "It was half way to Rivendell when the drugs began to take hold" Hunter S Tolkien "Fear and Loathing in Barad Dur" Iain Bowen From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 08:25:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939D616A4BF for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 08:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blacksheep.csh.rit.edu (blacksheep.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC8D43FBD for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 08:25:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from neo@csh.rit.edu) Received: from rehash (rehash.csh.rit.edu [129.21.61.9]) by blacksheep.csh.rit.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F54F112 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:25:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <002d01c3709d$3bac7480$093d1581@rehash> From: "Michael Goffin" To: Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:25:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Lucent Technologies Orinoco Gold X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 15:25:42 -0000 I posted a week or two ago about having issues with my Orinoco Gold wireless card not working in 5.1-current. It was suggested that I update the firmware. The firmware upgrade did not work. Has anyone had issues with this card in 5.1-current that they were able to resolve? Mike ------------------------------------ Michael J. Goffin Computer Science House Applied Networking and System Administration Rochester Institute of Technology http://www.csh.rit.edu/~neo neo@csh.rit.edu From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 09:39:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD31716A4C0 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A716D43FEA for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:39:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h81GdjTX026685; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 10:39:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 10:38:52 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030901.103852.122081183.imp@bsdimp.com> To: neo@csh.rit.edu From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <002d01c3709d$3bac7480$093d1581@rehash> References: <002d01c3709d$3bac7480$093d1581@rehash> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lucent Technologies Orinoco Gold X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 16:39:54 -0000 In message: <002d01c3709d$3bac7480$093d1581@rehash> "Michael Goffin" writes: : I posted a week or two ago about having issues with my Orinoco Gold wireless : card not working in 5.1-current. It was suggested that I update the : firmware. The firmware upgrade did not work. Has anyone had issues with this : card in 5.1-current that they were able to resolve? You might also want to try the owi driver. It isn't supported, and may disappear soon, but it was created to try to fix the lucent support in the wi driver. You can't have both the owi and wi drivers in the kernel at the same time. owi is supported only as a module. If it doesn't work, then oh well. Warner From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 09:45:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3348F16A4C2 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A072043FE1 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:45:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h81GjPwO024435; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:45:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h81GjPsn000715; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:45:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h81GjPGL000714; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:45:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:45:25 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20030901164525.GB562@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <002d01c3709d$3bac7480$093d1581@rehash> <20030901.103852.122081183.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030901.103852.122081183.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: neo@csh.rit.edu cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lucent Technologies Orinoco Gold X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 16:45:36 -0000 On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:38:52AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <002d01c3709d$3bac7480$093d1581@rehash> > "Michael Goffin" writes: > : I posted a week or two ago about having issues with my Orinoco Gold wireless > : card not working in 5.1-current. It was suggested that I update the > : firmware. The firmware upgrade did not work. Has anyone had issues with this > : card in 5.1-current that they were able to resolve? > > You might also want to try the owi driver. It isn't supported, and > may disappear soon, but it was created to try to fix the lucent > support in the wi driver. You can't have both the owi and wi drivers > in the kernel at the same time. owi is supported only as a module. > If it doesn't work, then oh well. What are the problems? I'm happily using my Lucent card without problems. That is, I have less problems with it than I had with an embedded PRISM3. wi0: at port 0x100-0x13f irq 9 function 0 config 1 on pccard0 wi0: 802.11 address: 00:02:2d:09:71:2b wi0: using Lucent Technologies, WaveLAN/IEEE wi0: Lucent Firmware: Station (6.6.1) wi0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps wi0: bad alloc 3d2 != ff, cur 0 nxt 0 -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 09:46:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786FA16A51C for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6EE43FE9 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:46:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h81GkoTX026860; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 10:46:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 10:45:56 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030901.104556.107856806.imp@bsdimp.com> To: marcel@xcllnt.net From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030901164525.GB562@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <002d01c3709d$3bac7480$093d1581@rehash> <20030901.103852.122081183.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030901164525.GB562@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: neo@csh.rit.edu cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lucent Technologies Orinoco Gold X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 16:46:53 -0000 In message: <20030901164525.GB562@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Marcel Moolenaar writes: : On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:38:52AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <002d01c3709d$3bac7480$093d1581@rehash> : > "Michael Goffin" writes: : > : I posted a week or two ago about having issues with my Orinoco Gold wireless : > : card not working in 5.1-current. It was suggested that I update the : > : firmware. The firmware upgrade did not work. Has anyone had issues with this : > : card in 5.1-current that they were able to resolve? : > : > You might also want to try the owi driver. It isn't supported, and : > may disappear soon, but it was created to try to fix the lucent : > support in the wi driver. You can't have both the owi and wi drivers : > in the kernel at the same time. owi is supported only as a module. : > If it doesn't work, then oh well. : : What are the problems? I'm happily using my Lucent card without : problems. That is, I have less problems with it than I had with : an embedded PRISM3. You are lucky,. Some people have huge issues with lucent cards, others don't for reasons that are poorly understood. : wi0: at port 0x100-0x13f irq 9 function 0 config 1 on pccard0 : wi0: 802.11 address: 00:02:2d:09:71:2b : wi0: using Lucent Technologies, WaveLAN/IEEE : wi0: Lucent Firmware: Station (6.6.1) : wi0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps : wi0: bad alloc 3d2 != ff, cur 0 nxt 0 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this is a problem. Warner From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 09:55:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7469916A4BF for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E5143F93 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:55:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h81GtmwO024524; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:55:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h81Gtmsn000743; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:55:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h81Gtmrv000742; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:55:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:55:48 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20030901165548.GC562@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <002d01c3709d$3bac7480$093d1581@rehash> <20030901.103852.122081183.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030901164525.GB562@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030901.104556.107856806.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030901.104556.107856806.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: neo@csh.rit.edu cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lucent Technologies Orinoco Gold X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 16:55:58 -0000 On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:45:56AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > : What are the problems? I'm happily using my Lucent card without > : problems. That is, I have less problems with it than I had with > : an embedded PRISM3. > > You are lucky,. Some people have huge issues with lucent cards, > others don't for reasons that are poorly understood. Have we done some "combinatorial exploration"? My card works in my notebook. Does a card with issues have issues in my notebook? Does my card work well in a notebook in which a lucent card has issues? Maybe we can have a "swappathon" at BSDcon and collect some data... > : wi0: bad alloc 3d2 != ff, cur 0 nxt 0 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this is a problem. Well, everything still works. So it's not really a problem for me. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 11:07:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA9F16A4BF for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0017843FE9 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:07:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from melange.errno.com (melange.errno.com [66.127.85.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h81I6v17040652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:07:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 11:06:56 -0700 From: Sam Leffler To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Message-ID: <667594910.1062414416@melange.errno.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.3 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Sony VAIO PCG-5312 experiences? X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 18:07:03 -0000 I've got a PCG-5312 that I'm considering running FreeBSD -current on. Does anyone have experiences installing FreeBSD (of any sort) on this machine? I'm mostly concerned about installing from the Sony bootable CD drive that connects via PCMCIA. Also, if you have experience replacing the standard 20G hard drive with something larger would also like to know. My understanding is these units are very sensitive to heat and using a larger drive may cause problems. Sam From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 17:32:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7D916A4BF for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp100.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp100.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [216.136.174.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACD5043FDD for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:32:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nw_clark@yahoo.com) Received: from dsl081-168-084.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO bart.greyhound.dyndns.org) (nw?clark@64.81.168.84 with login) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Sep 2003 00:32:23 -0000 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:32:19 -0700 From: Nathan Clark To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030901173219.0aee3017.nw_clark@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Netgear MA401 stopped working X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 00:32:27 -0000 I have an IBM Thinkpad 600X which dual boots 5.1-Current and XP-Pro. I purchased a Netgear MA401 wireless 802.11b card which worked fine under both OS's for about a week. This past Saturday, however, I was unable to connect to websites, my mail server etc. The symptoms are the same under both OS's: After an extended time of waiting, I eventually resolve the host, seem to be sending packets, but never receive anything back. So I took to pinging my gateway (192.168.112.1): bart# ping 192.168.112.1 PING 192.168.112.1 (192.168.112.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=3.030 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.077 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=3.140 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.934 ms ^C --- 192.168.112.1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 2.934/3.045/3.140/0.075 ms bart# ping www.google.com PING www.google.com (216.239.53.99): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 216.239.53.99: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=99.043 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.53.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=37.158 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.53.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=36.656 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.53.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=36.154 ms ^C --- www.google.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 36.154/52.253/99.043/27.017 ms bart# So far, so good. But check this out: bart# ping -D -s 128 192.168.112.1 PING 192.168.112.1 (192.168.112.1): 128 data bytes ^C --- 192.168.112.1 ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss bart# My first thought was check the MTU setting, but I haven't found that option for the wi driver. Besides, I haven't mucked with anything on the network. So I ran the same ping command again, this time with tcpdump monitoring the wi interface. ping still sees no response, but look what tcpdump saw: bart# tcpdump tcpdump: listening on wi0 16:15:15.508145 192.168.112.10 > gateway.int.jope.net: icmp: echo request 16:15:15.511106 gateway.int.jope.net > 192.168.112.10: icmp: echo reply 16:15:15.984403 192.168.112.10.49163 > caliban.int.jope.net.domain: 54094+ PTR? 1.112.168.192.in-addr.arpa. (44) 16:15:15.988652 arp who-has 192.168.112.10 tell gateway.int.jope.net 16:15:15.988693 arp reply 192.168.112.10 is-at 0:9:5b:54:c6:96 16:15:15.991514 caliban.int.jope.net.domain > 192.168.112.10.49163: 54094* 1/1/1 (117) 16:15:15.992078 192.168.112.10.49164 > caliban.int.jope.net.domain: 54095+ PTR? 10.112.168.192.in-addr.arpa. (45) 16:15:16.001517 caliban.int.jope.net.domain > 192.168.112.10.49164: 54095 NXDomain* 0/1/0 (95) 16:15:16.515254 192.168.112.10 > gateway.int.jope.net: icmp: echo request 16:15:16.517966 gateway.int.jope.net > 192.168.112.10: icmp: echo reply 16:15:16.995635 192.168.112.10.49165 > caliban.int.jope.net.domain: 54096+ PTR? 2.111.168.192.in-addr.arpa. (44) 16:15:16.999852 caliban.int.jope.net.domain > 192.168.112.10.49165: 54096* 1/1/1 (117) 16:15:17.525309 192.168.112.10 > gateway.int.jope.net: icmp: echo request 16:15:17.528173 gateway.int.jope.net > 192.168.112.10: icmp: echo reply 16:15:18.535258 192.168.112.10 > gateway.int.jope.net: icmp: echo request 16:15:18.538120 gateway.int.jope.net > 192.168.112.10: icmp: echo reply 16:15:19.545265 192.168.112.10 > gateway.int.jope.net: icmp: echo request 16:15:19.548276 gateway.int.jope.net > 192.168.112.10: icmp: echo reply ^C 18 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel bart# Ok, it looks to me like my gateway is responding to the pings, but ping isn't seeing them. How odd. I need more information. I fire up ethereal and ping my gateway again. Ping does not acknowledge any replies, but ethereal sees them. At this point, I don't really know what I'm looking at. Ethereal reports the IP checksum as correct, but the ICMP checksum as incorrect: Checksum: 0xb8a9 (incorrect, should be 0xb8a7) The payload looks correct to me (an increasing string of 128 bytes). I'm going to ping with a constant pattern this time and see what comes back: bart# ping -p aa -s 128 192.168.112.1 PATTERN: 0xaa PING 192.168.112.1 (192.168.112.1): 128 data bytes 136 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=3.125 ms 136 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.308 ms 136 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.909 ms 136 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=3.070 ms ^C --- 192.168.112.1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 2.909/3.103/3.308/0.143 ms bart# They came back!!! This time, ethereal shows the IP and ICMP checksums as correct. I notice that I can successfully ping the gateway with larger packets: bart# ping -p aa -s 1472 192.168.112.1 PATTERN: 0xaa PING 192.168.112.1 (192.168.112.1): 1472 data bytes 1480 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=8.927 ms 1480 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=8.793 ms 1480 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=8.829 ms 1480 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=8.472 ms ^C --- 192.168.112.1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 8.472/8.755/8.927/0.171 ms bart# But only if I specify a repeating pattern: bart# ping -s 1472 192.168.112.1 PING 192.168.112.1 (192.168.112.1): 1472 data bytes ^C --- 192.168.112.1 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss bart# ping -p 99 -s 1472 192.168.112.1 PATTERN: 0x99 PING 192.168.112.1 (192.168.112.1): 1472 data bytes 1480 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=8.958 ms 1480 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=8.718 ms 1480 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=8.790 ms 1480 bytes from 192.168.112.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=9.042 ms ^C --- 192.168.112.1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 8.718/8.877/9.042/0.129 ms bart# The same is true when I try pinging Sun: bart# ping -p 99 -s 1472 www.sun.com PATTERN: 0x99 PING www.sun.com (64.124.140.199): 1472 data bytes 1480 bytes from 64.124.140.199: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=132.539 ms 1480 bytes from 64.124.140.199: icmp_seq=1 ttl=243 time=107.285 ms 1480 bytes from 64.124.140.199: icmp_seq=2 ttl=243 time=104.601 ms ^C --- www.sun.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 104.601/114.808/132.539/12.585 ms bart# ping -s 1472 www.sun.com PING www.sun.com (64.124.140.199): 1472 data bytes ^C --- www.sun.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss bart# I really want to try some TCP traffic, so I enlist the help of firebird, which I point to www.freshports.org According to ethereal, freshports is acknowledging my requests. In fact, it does so several times, but the TCP checksum is incorrect. The wi driver has this to say about when things get really bad: Sep 1 16:57:24 bart kernel: wi0: failed in wi_seek to 3a2/0 Sep 1 16:57:26 bart kernel: wi0: failed in wi_seek to 3d3/0 And tons of similar messages. There are two other laptops( both Macs ) using this wireless network, neither one is experiencing any problems. My laptop works fine if I tether it to the access point using a Netgear FA411. I've exhausted my knowledge of TCP/IP and Wifi at this point. Netgear tech support suggested I contact Microsoft for instructions on changing the MTU settings. I, on the other hand, suspect a hardware problem with the card. I mean, it previously worked, then stopped under both OS's, other wireless laptops are having no problems on the same network, and other pcmcia cards work fine in the slot. Unfortunately I don't have another Intel based machine to test the wireless card in. Is there anything else I can do, before I RMA this thing? Oh yeah, the vitals: bart# uname -a FreeBSD bart.greyhound.dyndns.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #6: Sun Aug 31 12:57:32 PDT 2003 root@bart.greyhound.dyndns.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/OLDCARD_BART i386 cvsuped just prior to rebuilding. bart# dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #6: Sun Aug 31 12:57:32 PDT 2003 root@bart.greyhound.dyndns.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/OLDCARD_BART Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc05a6000. Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel Pentium III (498.27-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x681 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 201129984 (191 MB) avail memory = 189206528 (180 MB) Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 Using $PIR table, 6 entries at 0xc00f9d00 pcib0: at pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pci_cfgintr: 0:2 INTA BIOS irq 11 pci_cfgintr: 0:2 INTB BIOS irq 11 pci_cfgintr: 0:3 INTA BIOS irq 11 pci_cfgintr: 0:6 INTA BIOS irq 11 pci_cfgintr: 0:7 INTD BIOS irq 11 agp0: mem 0x40000000-0x43ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci_cfgintr: 1:0 INTA BIOS irq 11 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pcic0: mem 0x50103000-0x50103fff irq 11 at device 2.0 on pci0 pcic0: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [ring enable][speaker enable][pwr save][FUNC pci int + CSC serial isa irq] pccard0: on pcic0 pcic1: mem 0x50102000-0x50102fff irq 11 at device 2.1 on pci0 pcic1: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [ring enable][speaker enable][pwr save][FUNC pci int + CSC serial isa irq] pccard1: on pcic1 pci0: at device 3.0 (no driver attached) csa0: mem 0x50000000-0x500fffff,0x50100000-0x50100fff irq 11 at device 6.0 on pci0 csa: card is Thinkpad 600X/A20/T20 pcm0: on csa0 pcm0: isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xfcf0-0xfcff at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0x4000-0x401f irq 11 at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) orm0: