Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 00:26:53 -0700 From: "pan" <pan@syix.com> To: <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [releng_4 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha Message-ID: <002201c36490$f23c1d40$cc4cabcd@iris> References: <tenebrae_BSD@niceboots.com><20030816162103.Y1159@steeltoe.niceboots.com><20030817010026.95964C4@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> <20030817045922.GA48181@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>You're entitled to your opinion, but since you've never had to deal >with the flood of support requests when INDEX builds were broken by >careless committers before I started the automated tinderbox, I'd >suggest you try to consider it from point of view of those of us who >are actually involved in the support of the OS. >Kris If anyone is collecting opinions ... I can see the value of these tinderbox messages, but ... Could they please be posted to a list that users could choose to monitor? There are some of us who use a very low bandwidth connection to read what we need to from the freebsd lists. What with the spam load that filters through, receiving extra and continual tinderbox messages of low utility is taxing. Is there anything wrong with using tinderbox@freebsd.org? What was the thinking behind deciding to post these messages to stable? Pan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002201c36490$f23c1d40$cc4cabcd>