From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 02:22:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0B116A4CE; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 02:22:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4B943F85; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 02:22:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) hAGAMOGZ081506; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 05:22:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hAGAMN2k081505; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 05:22:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 05:22:23 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200311161022.hAGAMN2k081505@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> X-Authentication-Warning: triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org: des set sender to Tinderbox using -f Sender: Tinderbox From: Tinderbox To: stable@freebsd.org, alpha@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Subject: [releng_4 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 10:22:26 -0000 TB --- 2003-11-16 09:43:45 - tinderbox 2.2 running on triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org TB --- 2003-11-16 09:43:45 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-11-16 09:43:45 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-11-16 09:47:32 - building world TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src TB --- /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4: populating /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/obj/alpha/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/i386/usr/include >>> stage 4: building libraries >>> stage 4: make dependencies >>> stage 4: building everything.. TB --- 2003-11-16 10:22:03 - building generic kernel TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src TB --- /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sun Nov 16 10:22:03 GMT 2003 [...] echo "#define DDB 1" > opt_ddb.h echo "#define ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER 1" > opt_comconsole.h rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/dcons/../.. -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/dcons/../.. -I. -I@ -I@/../include -I/home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/obj/alpha/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/i386/usr/include /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/dcons/../../dev/dcons/dcons.c In file included from /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/dcons/../../ddb/ddb.h:40, from /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/dcons/../../dev/dcons/dcons.c:54: machine/db_machdep.h:38: opt_simos.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/dcons. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/obj/alpha/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/GENERIC. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src. TB --- 2003-11-16 10:22:23 - TB --- /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2003-11-16 10:22:23 - TB --- ERROR: failed to build generic kernel TB --- 2003-11-16 10:22:23 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 02:46:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B488316A4CE for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 02:46:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from rubyfalls.dnsrouter.com (rubyfalls.dnsrouter.com [69.61.37.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B8443FE3 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 02:46:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from websehri@rubyfalls.dnsrouter.com) Received: from websehri by rubyfalls.dnsrouter.com with local (Exim 4.24) id 1ALKPv-0002t6-IX for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 05:46:07 -0500 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: From: websehri@rubyfalls.dnsrouter.com Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 05:46:07 -0500 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - rubyfalls.dnsrouter.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32084 32084] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - rubyfalls.dnsrouter.com Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?Websehri=2Ecom_A=E7=FDld=FD?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 10:46:10 -0000 www.websehri.com Websehri.com Acildi From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 15:29:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD8116A4CE for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:29:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl (smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4244743FF3 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:29:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jerrroen@xs4all.nl) Received: from [10.0.0.201] (mammaloe.xs4all.nl [80.126.153.62]) by smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAGNTFGt088322 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:29:15 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Jeroen Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:29:14 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) Subject: Buildworld stops at etc/sendmail (was: can't install 'bin/sh') X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:29:17 -0000 lo, same problem here. discovered an entry in my (default) cvsup refuse file with `src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc`. bit weird though? why put that in the default refuse file? gtx, jeroen From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 16:05:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6011816A4E2 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:05:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ptb-mailc05.plus.net (ptb-mailc05.plus.net [212.159.14.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F7B43FDD for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:05:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@physicalsegment.com) Received: from [212.159.101.161] (helo=mail.physicalsegment.com) by ptb-mailc05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ALWt5-0004Yv-00 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:05:03 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.192] (helo=jd2400) by mail.physicalsegment.com with smtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AKmnI-0000XL-Ei; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:52:00 +0000 Message-ID: <003401c3ab01$e9154c70$c000000a@jd2400> From: "James Read" To: "Marc G. Fournier" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kov=E1cs_J=E1nos?= References: Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:51:58 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel panic on 4.9-release with nullfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:05:28 -0000 > But now after some minutes the same crash. I made some other > dump: > > 1: one nullfs-mounted jail at init 6: reboot after panic: null_checkvp > http://turando.felvi.hu/crash/crash_2.tgz (~430M) > http://turando.felvi.hu/crash/gdb.out.2 > > > 2: simply nullfs mounted jails: 2xbind9 (etc,named.conf+zone files,usr); > oops proxy(etc,usr); mysqld(etc,usr), djbdns (etc,usr) > Hi, I run sevral jails on 4.9 with a heavey usage of mount_nullfs with absolutly no crashes or had any problems with it, same with 4.8 (upgraded from 4.8 to 4.9, no mount_nullfs changes to the box) In the jails, I run bind,samba,apache,smtp/imap server(maildir),squid,mysqld,sshd,pureftpd. This is my mount output: bash-2.05b# mount /dev/ad1s1a on / (ufs, local) /dev/ad1s1f on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates) /dev/ad1s1g on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates) /dev/ad1s1e on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates) procfs on /proc (procfs, local) /dev/ad3s1 on xxxxx(ufs, local, soft-updates) /dev/ad4s1 on xxxxxx(ufs, local, soft-updates) /dev/ad5s1 on xxxxxx(ufs, local, soft-updates) /dev/ad6s1 on xxxxx(ufs, local, soft-updates) /usr/ports on /usr/local/jails/xxxxxxx/usr/ports (null, local) /usr/ports on /usr/local/jails/xxxxxxxxx/usr/ports (null, local) /usr/ports on /usr/local/jails/xxxxxx/usr/ports (null, local) Regards, James -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Mailscanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 16:45:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823EA16A4CF for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:45:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EFC43FBD for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:45:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id hAH0jJu20929; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:45:19 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: Jeroen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:45:18 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311161645.18726.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: Buildworld stops at etc/sendmail (was: can't install 'bin/sh') X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:45:23 -0000 On Sunday 16 November 2003 03:29 pm, Jeroen wrote: > lo, > > same problem here. discovered an entry in my (default) cvsup refuse > file with `src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc`. bit weird though? why put that > in the default refuse file? > It was an example. You were supposed to change it to what you needed. To many people didn't and it has been removed from the current example. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 18:38:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA7716A4CF for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:38:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (bay8-f98.bay8.hotmail.com [64.4.27.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DEE43F93 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:38:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd_stable@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:38:44 -0800 Received: from 219.76.64.2 by by8fd.bay8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 02:38:44 GMT X-Originating-IP: [219.76.64.2] X-Originating-Email: [freebsd_stable@hotmail.com] From: "nobody nobody" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:38:44 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Nov 2003 02:38:44.0882 (UTC) FILETIME=[EBA0E720:01C3ACB3] Subject: make package X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 02:38:45 -0000 Hello, I recently tried to build my packages of FreeBSD-4.9 stable for my case. I noticed that the packages of dependencies were not build under the $PACKAGES/All and I man man ports which didn't show the option to do that. (e.g. cvsup-without-gui needs libiconv ... ) I would like to know if there exists any options or methods to build the dependencies packages as well while I try to build the packages (e.g. cvsup-without-gui). Thanks. Clarence _________________________________________________________________ Get 10Mb extra storage for MSN Hotmail. Subscribe Now! http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-hk From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 19:25:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155F716A4CE for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 19:25:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from doom.homeunix.org (9-189.dialup.comset.net [213.172.9.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62EA43F93 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 19:25:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: from doom.homeunix.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doom.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAH3LUMa000403; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:22:25 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: (from igor@localhost) by doom.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hAH3KaLt000402; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:20:36 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igor) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:20:36 +0300 From: Igor Pokrovsky To: nobody nobody Message-ID: <20031117032036.GA357@doom.homeunix.org> Mail-Followup-To: nobody nobody , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Accept-Language: ru cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make package X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 03:25:55 -0000 On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:38:44AM +0800, nobody nobody wrote: > Hello, > > I recently tried to build my packages of FreeBSD-4.9 stable for my case. > I noticed that the packages of dependencies were not build under the > $PACKAGES/All and I man man ports which didn't show the option to do that. > (e.g. cvsup-without-gui needs libiconv ... ) I would like to know if there > exists any options or methods to build the dependencies packages as well > while I try to build the packages (e.g. cvsup-without-gui). You can use ports/sysutils/portupgrade to run the following: portinstall -pR cvsup-without-gui -ip -- To generalize is to be an idiot. -- William Blake From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 00:06:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993B016A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:06:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED82743FBD for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:06:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAH86dhk058188; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:36:40 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: "nobody nobody" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:36:39 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311171836.39214.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -4.4 () CARRIAGE_RETURNS,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Subject: Re: make package X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:06:45 -0000 On Monday 17 November 2003 13:08, nobody nobody wrote: > I recently tried to build my packages of FreeBSD-4.9 stable for my case. > I noticed that the packages of dependencies were not build under the > $PACKAGES/All and I man man ports which didn't show the option to do that. > (e.g. cvsup-without-gui needs libiconv ... ) I would like to know if there > exists any options or methods to build the dependencies packages as well > while I try to build the packages (e.g. cvsup-without-gui). You can do.. make package PACKAGES=/tmp/packages DEPENDS_TARGET=package -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 00:08:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D51C16A4CF for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:08:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.eunet.yu (smtp3.eunet.yu [194.247.192.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D008343FDD for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:08:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kolicz@eunet.yu) Received: from smtp3.EUnet.yu (root@localhost) by smtp3.eunet.yu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id hAH88Hwg002347 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:08:17 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (P-2.102.EUnet.yu [213.240.2.102]) by smtp3.eunet.yu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAH88FWb002224 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:08:16 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAH87wFj001110 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:08:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kolicz@eunet.yu) Received: (from zoran@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hAH86nH0001082 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:06:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kolicz@eunet.yu) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: zoran set sender to kolicz@eunet.yu using -f Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:06:49 +0100 From: Zoran Kolic To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031117080649.GA529@> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: account-hook X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:08:21 -0000 Dear List! I've tried to add another pop3 account to my muttrc and found problem using account hook for that. Ie: account-hook pop://my_pop_server/ 'set pop_user="xy" pop_pass="zw"' If I use fetchmail, there is no problem at all. But, if the hook is set, mutt says "there is no host set". Send- mail options in rc.conf are sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="YES" sendmail_outbound_enable="YES" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" What options I really need, sending and receiving mail? Conf file with pop_host, pop_user, pop_pass works just for one pop server. Another one makes host unset message. Is my syntax wrong? Best regards ZK From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 00:45:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D356316A4CF for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:45:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from cray.e-card.bg (mjak.e-card.bg [212.91.167.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4B943F75 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:45:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from altares@cray.e-card.bg) Received: from cray.e-card.bg (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cray.e-card.bg (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAH8jYS7028297 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:45:34 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from altares@cray.e-card.bg) Received: (from altares@localhost) by cray.e-card.bg (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hAH8jWt5028296 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:45:32 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:45:32 +0200 From: Rumen Telbizov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031117084532.GA14432@e-card.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: 4.9 and Ctrl+C problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:45:38 -0000 Dear List, I've been upgrading a few servers to 4.9-STABLE recently. Some of them via cvsup from older versions and some of them via installing 4.9-RELEASE and then cvsuping to STABLE. In both cases I cannot send ctrl+c through ssh! If I am on the console there is no problem but if I am through a ptty obviously ctrl+c does not send the signal correctly. E.g. if I do tail -f /some/file.log I can not terminate it! Ctrl+Z works fine. Despite when my job is susspended I cannot kill pid. Instead I have to kill -9 pid. Is it related with the terminal? My /etc/ttys is default. Any comments are welcome. Thank you in advance. Rumen Telbizov From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 04:10:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B06E16A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 04:10:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A02643FE0 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 04:10:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 435C6530C; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:10:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 332515308; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:10:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id D3D9133C68; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:10:09 +0100 (CET) To: "nobody nobody" References: From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:10:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: (nobody nobody's message of "Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:38:44 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: ss X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make package X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:10:19 -0000 "nobody nobody" writes: > I recently tried to build my packages of FreeBSD-4.9 stable for my > case. I noticed that the packages of dependencies were not build > under the $PACKAGES/All and I man man ports which didn't show the > option to do that. Use misc/porteasy. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 05:47:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E7116A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 05:47:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ene.asda.gr (ene.asda.gr [193.92.118.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA3943F3F for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 05:47:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lefty@ene.asda.gr) Received: from ene.asda.gr (lefty.ene.asda.gr [193.92.118.162]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Lefteris Tsintjelis", Issuer "E 'n' E CA" (verified OK)) by ene.asda.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F29170; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:47:30 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <3FB8D15C.947E52B1@ene.asda.gr> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:47:08 +0200 From: Lefteris Tsintjelis Organization: ASDA X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,el MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug White References: <3FAE5958.6B162FAF@ene.asda.gr> <20031111180355.A66327@carver.gumbysoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Machine Freezes with SMP+APIC enabled. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:47:27 -0000 Doug White wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote: > > > I have been experiencing random machine freezes when using SMP (Hyper > > threading) the past week. There are no core dumps or error messages > > displayed anywhere. Load is very minimum. When SMP/Hyperthreading is > > disabled machine works with no problems at full load. > > Hm, smells like Giant deadlock. > Hi Doug, and thank you for all the info. The motherboard of the PC decided to finally die on me last week so it looks like it was a hardware deadlock. I got it replaced and cvsup to the latest STABLE. It has been working very STABLE the past couple of days. Best Regards, Lefteris Tsintjelis > dwhite's Form Letter on Debugging Giant Deadlocks > > If you are experiencing problems with CURRENT locking up hard, it may be > due to a deadlock against the Giant mutex, which controls large parts of > the kernel. Symptoms include: > > . No response to any input > . System video console > . Network (ping) > > To debug this, you will need to set up a serial console with some special > kernel options. Instructions for booting with serial console are in the > Handbook, but you will have to compile with the following kernel options: > > options DDB > options BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER > options WITNESS > options INVARIANTS > options INVARIANTS_SUPPORT > > Make sure your serial console is capable of sending a Break signal. If > not, use "ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER" instead of "BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER". > > Enable the serial console and boot the system. Turn on terminal logging. > In loader, stop the boot and type "boot -v" at the OK prompt to get > additional info during the boot process. > > Once the system is up, trigger the hang. When the system hangs, issue the > Break signal (or if you have used ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER, press Enter ~ ^E > b (tilde, Ctrl-E, b)). > > If you get the db> prompt, then your hang is probably due to a Giant > deadlock. If not, then something else may be at fault. > > Once in db>, run the following two commands and capture their output using > your terminal's logging capability: > > show locks > tr > > Take these and the boot -v output, put them on a webpage, and send a > message to current@freebsd.org carefully explaining what you did to > trigger the hang. > > Good luck! > > > > > Best, > > Lefteris Tsintjelis From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 06:02:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8AA16A4CF for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:02:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from web20710.mail.yahoo.com (web20710.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.226.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AE0443F3F for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:02:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from caroloveres@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20031117140240.41031.qmail@web20710.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [194.151.226.35] by web20710.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:02:40 PST Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:02:40 -0800 (PST) From: Carol Overes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Secure updating of OS and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:02:41 -0000 Hi, I'm looking for a way to update in a secure manner my kernel, binaries and anything from the ports collection. I'm thinking of updating kernel and binaries with patches form ftp.freebsd.org which are siganed with the PGP key of the security officers. However, this has to be hand-made patching. Does anyone know a secure way via for example cvsup ? Also, I'm looking for a secure way to update ports applications. How can I check that patches for ports doesn't contain any trojans for example, or are coming from the original source. Any thoughts about his ? Thanks in advance. Carol Overes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 06:18:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7325216A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:18:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from trillian.santala.org (ip212-226-173-33.adsl.kpnqwest.fi [212.226.173.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7914343F3F for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:18:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jake@iki.fi) Received: (qmail 52658 invoked by uid 11053); 17 Nov 2003 14:19:03 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Nov 2003 14:19:03 -0000 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:19:03 +0200 (EET) From: Jarkko Santala X-X-Sender: jake@trillian.santala.org To: Carol Overes In-Reply-To: <20031117140240.41031.qmail@web20710.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20031117161033.X35508@trillian.santala.org> References: <20031117140240.41031.qmail@web20710.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Secure updating of OS and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:18:32 -0000 On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Carol Overes wrote: > I'm looking for a way to update in a secure manner my > kernel, binaries and anything from the ports > collection. > > I'm thinking of updating kernel and binaries with > patches form ftp.freebsd.org which are siganed with > the PGP key of the security officers. However, this > has to be hand-made patching. Does anyone know a > secure way via for example cvsup ? > > Also, I'm looking for a secure way to update ports > applications. How can I check that patches for ports > doesn't contain any trojans for example, or are coming > from the original source. > > Any thoughts about his ? I was thinking about this same problem myself not too long ago. What I came up with was that all the related files could have md5sums (as the distfiles already do) and these md5sum files would be signed by a trusted entity and by default the Makefiles would check the md5sum signatures, the md5sums themselves and refuse to do anything unless it all checks out. While that would work great for ports, the actual source tree could be a problem. If all files would have associated md5sums which would all be checked during compilation, it might make the whole process unbearably slow on slow machines. Although then there might be a switch to disable the checking to increase speed at the cost of security. Also there's the problem of locating the entity that would check all the source code both in src and ports before signing. Of course the ports could be signed by maintainers using a method provided by the FreeBSD project, such as a key associated with a certificate. Considerable amounts of work into a full-out PKI infrastructure could of course also be a problem. All this de facto PGP/GPG stuff just makes my head hurt. More thoughts, anyone? =09-jake --=20 Jarkko Santala System Administrator http://iki.fi/jake= / From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 09:03:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D92A16A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:03:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0804843FB1 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:03:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAHH1MMg066517; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:01:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)hAHH1M4J066514; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:01:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:01:22 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: "Marc G. Fournier" In-Reply-To: <20031115211530.J34088@ganymede.hub.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: memory locking in a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:03:27 -0000 On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > With gpg setuid root, I'm getting the following 'insecure memory' issue > when running inside of a jail: > > gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory! > > from the FAQ, it has to do with memory locking ... is this something > that can't be done inside of a jail? Or just an issue with jail in 4.x? FreeBSD requires privilege to lock pages in memory; right now, that privilege check does not allow mlock() to be used in a jail. You can modify that privilege check locally to permit privileged users in jail() to use mlock() by editing vm_mmap.c to pass the PRISON_ROOT flag into suser_cred() or suser_xxx(), depending on whether you're using -CURRENT or -STABLE. There's #ifdef'd out code that permits locking of memory for unprivileged processes based on a resource limit, but I'm not sufficiently familiar with the history of that to comment on which it's commented out. Locked memory is a very precious resource, though, so any reduction of the privilege level necessary to lock memory needs to be thought through very carefully, and in the context of any past history of the issue. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 09:30:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDB616A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:30:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (A17-250-248-47.apple.com [17.250.248.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9249C43FDF for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:30:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (8.12.6/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id hAHHU2YN026655 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:30:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (dpvc-68-161-244-25.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.244.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 3.0) with ESMTP id hAHHU1Zq002005 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:30:01 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) In-Reply-To: <20031117161033.X35508@trillian.santala.org> References: <20031117140240.41031.qmail@web20710.mail.yahoo.com> <20031117161033.X35508@trillian.santala.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:29:59 -0500 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) Subject: Re: Secure updating of OS and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:30:06 -0000 On Nov 17, 2003, at 9:19 AM, Jarkko Santala wrote: [ ... ] > While that would work great for ports, the actual source tree could be > a > problem. If all files would have associated md5sums which would all be > checked during compilation, it might make the whole process unbearably > slow on slow machines. Although then there might be a switch to disable > the checking to increase speed at the cost of security. Using md5 checksums on distfiles has proven useful in the case where a source tarball has been trojaned. But a tarball is a self-contained entity which can be verified as a whole-- you don't have to verify each file within that archive if you trust the message digest algorithm being used. And if you trust the people who created the original tarball, of course. > Also there's the problem of locating the entity that would check all > the > source code both in src and ports before signing. Of course the ports > could be signed by maintainers using a method provided by the FreeBSD > project, such as a key associated with a certificate. To some extent, using RSA or DSA keypairs in conjunction with CVS over SSH would give you about what you are looking for, and they are used when committers make changes to the FreeBSD CVS repository. Normally, people who checkout the FreeBSD sources via CVS or CVSUP are doing so anonymously and without encryption, but it would be possible to do a 'cvs checkout' or 'cvs update' via SSH instead. > Considerable amounts of work into a full-out PKI infrastructure could > of > course also be a problem. All this de facto PGP/GPG stuff just makes my > head hurt. RFC-3280 isn't aspirin, unfortunately. :-) Using X.509 certs rather than PGP/GPG would change the model of trust and perhaps make it a little easier for end-users to verify signed content, but that is mostly because end-users are given pre-trusted root certificates that SSL certs derive from. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 09:44:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F54516A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:44:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797BB43FD7 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:44:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.166] helo=localhost) by tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ALn53-0000FL-HL for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:22:29 +0000 Received: from rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.165]) by localhost (scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 30098-01-156 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:22:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.161.253]) by rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ALmjn-0002BT-5z for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:00:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 22231 invoked by uid 0); 17 Nov 2003 17:00:31 -0000 Received: from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk by gateway by uid 71 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (sweep: 2.14/3.71. spamassassin: 2.53. Clear:. Processed in 8.581104 secs); 17 Nov 2003 17:00:31 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk via gateway X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 8.581104 secs) Received: from dhcp1131.wadham.ox.ac.uk (HELO piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk) (163.1.161.131) by gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk with SMTP; 17 Nov 2003 17:00:22 -0000 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.1.20031117165641.03101720@popserver.sfu.ca> X-Sender: cperciva@popserver.sfu.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:00:16 +0000 To: Carol Overes , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: <20031117140240.41031.qmail@web20710.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: Secure updating of OS and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:44:15 -0000 At 06:02 17/11/2003 -0800, Carol Overes wrote: >I'm thinking of updating kernel and binaries with >patches form ftp.freebsd.org which are siganed with >the PGP key of the security officers. However, this >has to be hand-made patching. Does anyone know a >secure way via for example cvsup ? CVSup is insecure. FreeBSD Update might do what you want, but you'd have to trust me. :) >Also, I'm looking for a secure way to update ports >applications. How can I check that patches for ports >doesn't contain any trojans for example, or are coming >from the original source. There isn't any way to update the ports tree securely. I'd like to fix this, but at the moment I need to give priority to my DPhil work, so it probably isn't going to happen in the near future. Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 13:04:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BF116A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:04:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.hispeed.ch (mxout.hispeed.ch [62.2.95.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C744E43F3F for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:04:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from llx@hispeed.ch) Received: from asterix.corebounce.org (dclient217-162-237-56.hispeed.ch [217.162.237.56])hAHL4nJn011658 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:04:50 +0100 From: llx To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:04:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311172204.48726.llx@hispeed.ch> Subject: portupgrade fails: no locking avaiable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:04:53 -0000 i've a nfs server (FreeBSD 4.9) which exports the ports tree via NFS. on the client machine (FreeBSD 5.1) portupgrade fails: > checking configure summary... ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config why does this happen? i thought that FreeBSD 5.x supports nfslocking as a client. on the server is started rpc.lockd and rpc.statd (see output rpcinfo below). cheers llx ipcinfo -p sh-2.05b$ rpcinfo -p frigi program vers proto port 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper 100004 1 udp 1021 ypserv 100004 2 udp 1021 ypserv 100004 1 tcp 1023 ypserv 100004 2 tcp 1023 ypserv 100009 1 udp 1011 yppasswdd 100009 1 tcp 1022 yppasswdd 100005 3 udp 1008 mountd 100005 3 tcp 1021 mountd 100005 1 udp 1008 mountd 100005 1 tcp 1021 mountd 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs 100003 3 udp 2049 nfs 100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs 100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs 100021 1 udp 994 nlockmgr 100021 3 udp 994 nlockmgr 100021 4 udp 994 nlockmgr 100021 1 tcp 1020 nlockmgr 100021 3 tcp 1020 nlockmgr 100021 4 tcp 1020 nlockmgr 100024 1 udp 986 status 100024 1 tcp 1019 status From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 16:15:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BF316A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:15:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7128143FAF for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:15:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1ALtWU-0004Ci-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:15:14 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:15:14 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031118001514.GC15325@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Subject: Hang on boot with 4.9-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:15:16 -0000 Yet another hang on boot issue wqith 4.9. I havn't seen anything the same go through the list and I've searched the archives but not found anything appropriate. Dual processor P4 box, serverworks chipset, that has been rock solid under 4.8-P3, took it to 4.9-R and 4.9-STABLE (as of today) and it hangs on boot after the apm0 line. It's doing SMP and the motherboard has hyperthreading enabled. It won't break out to the kernel debugger so I can't get a kernel dump. Clues ? Known issue ? P. FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #6: Mon Nov 17 18:02:33 EST 2003 pir@falcon:/usr/src/sys/compile/SWORKS Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Intel(R) XEON(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2395.92-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf24 Stepping = 4 Features=0x3febfbff Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 1073217536 (1048064K bytes) avail memory = 1041133568 (1016732K bytes) Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #1 Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #2 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000 cpu2 (AP): apic id: 6, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000 cpu3 (AP): apic id: 7, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00178020, at 0xfec00000 io1 (APIC): apic id: 3, version: 0x00178020, at 0xfec80000 io2 (APIC): apic id: 4, version: 0x00178020, at 0xfec80400 Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc03cc000. Warning: Pentium 4 CPU: PSE disabled Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 24 entries at 0xc00fde40 apm0: on motherboard -- pir From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 17:49:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E95D16A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:49:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F2443F3F for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:49:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAI1l8Mg082578; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:47:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)hAI1l7SJ082575; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:47:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:47:07 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: llx In-Reply-To: <200311172204.48726.llx@hispeed.ch> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade fails: no locking avaiable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 01:49:13 -0000 On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, llx wrote: > i've a nfs server (FreeBSD 4.9) which exports the ports tree via NFS. > on the client machine (FreeBSD 5.1) portupgrade fails: > > > checking configure summary... ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba > would be unsafe > > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config > > why does this happen? i thought that FreeBSD 5.x supports nfslocking as a > client. on the server is started rpc.lockd and rpc.statd (see output rpcinfo > below). Are you running rpc.statd and rpc.lockd on the client as well? Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories > > cheers > llx > > ipcinfo -p > > sh-2.05b$ rpcinfo -p frigi > program vers proto port > 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper > 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper > 100004 1 udp 1021 ypserv > 100004 2 udp 1021 ypserv > 100004 1 tcp 1023 ypserv > 100004 2 tcp 1023 ypserv > 100009 1 udp 1011 yppasswdd > 100009 1 tcp 1022 yppasswdd > 100005 3 udp 1008 mountd > 100005 3 tcp 1021 mountd > 100005 1 udp 1008 mountd > 100005 1 tcp 1021 mountd > 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs > 100003 3 udp 2049 nfs > 100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs > 100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs > 100021 1 udp 994 nlockmgr > 100021 3 udp 994 nlockmgr > 100021 4 udp 994 nlockmgr > 100021 1 tcp 1020 nlockmgr > 100021 3 tcp 1020 nlockmgr > 100021 4 tcp 1020 nlockmgr > 100024 1 udp 986 status > 100024 1 tcp 1019 status > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 20:23:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF5316A4D0 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:23:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7757B43FBF for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:23:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from westcoastlew@earthlink.net) Received: from user-vcaup2p.dsl.mindspring.com ([216.175.100.89] helo=luis) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1ALxOw-0006eb-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:23:42 -0800 Message-ID: <002e01c3ad8b$bfaa6320$6401a8c0@luis> From: To: Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:23:39 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: make error on kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 04:23:47 -0000 shells# make=20 cc -c -x assembler-with-cpp -DLOCORE -O -pipe -mcpu=3Dpentiumpro -Wall = -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes = -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual = -fformat-extensions -std=3Dc99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. = -I../../../dev -I../../../contrib/dev/acpica -I../../../contrib/ipfilter = -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings = -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 -ffreestanding -Werror = ../../../i386/i386/locore.s cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls = -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes = -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=3Dc99 = -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../../../dev = -I../../../contrib/dev/acpica -I../../../contrib/ipfilter -D_KERNEL = -include opt_global.h -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings = -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 -ffreestanding -Werror = aic7xxx_reg_print.c bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:189: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:189: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:190: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:190: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:191: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:191: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:192: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:192: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:193: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:193: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:194: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:194: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:195: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:195: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:196: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:196: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:197: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:197: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:198: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:198: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:199: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:199: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:200: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:200: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:201: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:201: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:202: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:202: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:203: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:203: warning: called from here pci_if.h:21: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_READ_CONFIG' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:213: warning: called from here pci_if.h:32: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_WRITE_CONFIG' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:219: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:234: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:234: warning: called from here pci_if.h:59: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_ENABLE_BUSMASTER' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:255: warning: called from here pci_if.h:68: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_DISABLE_BUSMASTER' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:261: warning: called from here pci_if.h:77: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_ENABLE_IO' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:267: warning: called from here pci_if.h:86: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_DISABLE_IO' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:273: warning: called from here pci_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_SET_POWERSTATE' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:300: warning: called from here pci_if.h:41: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_GET_POWERSTATE' ../../../dev/pci/pcivar.h:306: warning: called from here machine/bus_at386.h:207: warning: inlining failed in call to = `bus_space_read_1' ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:278: warning: called from here pci_if.h:21: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_READ_CONFIG' ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:213: warning: called from here pci_if.h:32: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_WRITE_CONFIG' ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:219: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:202: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:201: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:200: warning: called from here *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/BLACKHAWK. I had typed, cp GENERIC BLACKHAWK edited blackhawk, /usr/sbin/config BLACKHAWK cd ../compile/BLACKHAWK make depend make -------------ERRORD ON MAKE I currently run 5.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jun 5 02:55:42 = GMT 2003 Trying to upgrade to something higher.. Any suggestions on what to do? this had just happend after I went to add some additional options in my = kernel, "option quota"=20 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 21:35:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B154A16A4CF for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:35:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from frenchfries.net (lsanca1-ar14-4-60-145-009.lsanca1.dsl-verizon.net [4.60.145.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80C643FBF for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:35:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pherman@frenchfries.net) Received: by frenchfries.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A49E04AF6; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:35:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frenchfries.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDF44AEC for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:35:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:35:37 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Herman X-X-Sender: pherman@mammoth.eat.frenchfries.net To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <20031118053537.A49E04AF6@frenchfries.net> Subject: panic in 4.9-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 05:35:44 -0000 I've seen this (double) page fault happen every now and then for quite some time, so I don't think this is new. panic happens when lots of interrupts are happening, not necessarily on the wi0 interface. Anyone know what's going on here? 4.9-STABLE from a couple of weeks ago. -Paul. Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x30 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc035ff60 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc04729f8 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc0472a00 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = Idle interrupt mask = net tty bio cam trap number = 12 panic: page fault [...] (kgdb) bt #0 dumpsys () at /u01/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 #1 0xc023d05b in boot (howto=260) at /u01/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:316 #2 0xc023d499 in panic (fmt=0xc046962c "%s") at /u01/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #3 0xc03d2ffb in trap_fatal (frame=0xc04729b8, eva=48) at /u01/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 #4 0xc03d2ca9 in trap_pfault (frame=0xc04729b8, usermode=0, eva=48) at /u01/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 #5 0xc03d284f in trap (frame={tf_fs = -1071251440, tf_es = 6750224, tf_ds = -1069088752, tf_edi = 0, tf_esi = -1056606464, tf_ebp = -1069078016, tf_isp = -1069078044, tf_ebx = -1068836260, tf_edx = 6867008, tf_ecx = -860387712, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1070203040, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66050, tf_esp = -1056606464, tf_ss = -1056606464}) at /u01/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 #6 0xc035ff60 in acquire_lock (lk=0xc04ada5c) at /u01/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:266 #7 0xc0364060 in softdep_update_inodeblock (ip=0xc1057700, bp=0xc37bbe04, waitfor=0) at /u01/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:3813 #8 0xc035f095 in ffs_update (vp=0xccb78680, waitfor=0) at /u01/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_inode.c:106 #9 0xc03674de in ffs_sync (mp=0xc0ff3200, waitfor=2, cred=0xc0b2c880, p=0xc04f4620) at /u01/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1025 #10 0xc026ddf7 in sync (p=0xc04f4620, uap=0x0) at /u01/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:577 #11 0xc023cdf6 in boot (howto=256) at /u01/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:235 #12 0xc023d499 in panic (fmt=0xc046962c "%s") at /u01/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #13 0xc03d2ffb in trap_fatal (frame=0xc0472b90, eva=12) at /u01/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 #14 0xc03d2ca9 in trap_pfault (frame=0xc0472b90, usermode=0, eva=12) at /u01/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 #15 0xc03d284f in trap (frame={tf_fs = -1055850480, tf_es = 16, tf_ds = 999948304, tf_edi = -7, tf_esi = 0, tf_ebp = -1069077540, tf_isp = -1069077572, tf_ebx = -1062000640, tf_edx = 1, tf_ecx = 0, tf_eax = 7, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1071276043, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66050, tf_esp = -1062000640, tf_ss = -1057378304}) at /u01/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 #16 0xc0259ff5 in m_copydata (m=0xc0b35900, off=14, len=-7, cp=0xc0f9b1f6 "% G\223") at /u01/src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c:984 #17 0xc0218f9b in wi_start (ifp=0xc0f9b000) at /u01/src/sys/dev/wi/if_wi.c:2319 #18 0xc021b6e7 in wihap_data_input (sc=0xc0f9b000, rxfrm=0xc0472cb4, m=0xc0b31100) at /u01/src/sys/net/if_var.h:289 #19 0xc0216361 in wi_rxeof (sc=0xc0f9b000) at /u01/src/sys/dev/wi/if_wi.c:799 #20 0xc021665a in wi_intr (xsc=0xc0f9b000) at /u01/src/sys/dev/wi/if_wi.c:935 #21 0xc023b23e in add_interrupt_randomness (vsc=0xc04f34e4) at /u01/src/sys/kern/kern_random.c:247 #22 0xc03c9ed6 in cpu_idle () at /u01/src/sys/i386/i386/machdep.c:1000 (kgdb) up 16 #16 0xc0259ff5 in m_copydata (m=0xc0b35900, off=14, len=-7, cp=0xc0f9b1f6 "%§G\223") at /u01/src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c:984 984 } (kgdb) list 979 KASSERT(m != NULL, ("m_copydata, offset > size of mbuf chain")); 980 if (off < m->m_len) 981 break; 982 off -= m->m_len; 983 m = m->m_next; 984 } 985 while (len > 0) { 986 KASSERT(m != NULL, ("m_copydata, length > size of mbuf chain")); 987 count = min(m->m_len - off, len); 988 bcopy(mtod(m, caddr_t) + off, cp, count); (kgdb) print m $1 = (struct mbuf *) 0x0 (kgdb) up #17 0xc0218f9b in wi_start (ifp=0xc0f9b000) at /u01/src/sys/dev/wi/if_wi.c:2319 2319 m_copydata(m0, sizeof(struct ether_header), (kgdb) list 2314 tx_frame.wi_type = eh->ether_type; 2315 2316 if (sc->wi_ptype == WI_PORTTYPE_AP && sc->wi_use_wep) { 2317 /* Do host encryption. */ 2318 bcopy(&tx_frame.wi_dat[0], &sc->wi_txbuf[4], 8); 2319 m_copydata(m0, sizeof(struct ether_header), 2320 m0->m_pkthdr.len - sizeof(struct ether_header), 2321 (caddr_t)&sc->wi_txbuf[12]); 2322 wi_do_hostencrypt(sc, &sc->wi_txbuf[0], 2323 tx_frame.wi_dat_len); (kgdb) print *m0 $2 = {m_hdr = {mh_next = 0x0, mh_nextpkt = 0x0, mh_data = 0xc0b32800 "\001", mh_len = 7, mh_type = 1, mh_flags = 515}, M_dat = { MH = {MH_pkthdr = {rcvif = 0xc0f9b000, len = 7, header = 0x0, csum_flags = 0, csum_data = 3, tags = {slh_first = 0x0}}, MH_dat = {MH_ext = {ext_buf = 0xc0b32800 "\001", ext_free = ³0, ext_size = 2048, ext_ref = 0}, MH_databuf = "\000(À\000\000\000\000\000\b\000\000\000\000\000\000E\000\005Ü<\225 [...] From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 23:25:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE28B16A4CF for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:25:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9611743FB1 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:25:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Received: from kuzbass.ru (kost [213.184.65.82])hAI7Owlf018645; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:24:59 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Message-ID: <3FB9C90E.F44246A@kuzbass.ru> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:23:58 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein Organization: SVZServ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Peter Radcliffe References: <20031118001514.GC15325@pir.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Hang on boot with 4.9-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:25:04 -0000 Peter Radcliffe wrote: > Yet another hang on boot issue wqith 4.9. I havn't seen anything the > same go through the list and I've searched the archives but not found > anything appropriate. > > Dual processor P4 box, serverworks chipset, that has been rock solid > under 4.8-P3, took it to 4.9-R and 4.9-STABLE (as of today) and it > hangs on boot after the apm0 line. It's doing SMP and the motherboard > has hyperthreading enabled. > > It won't break out to the kernel debugger so I can't get a kernel dump. > > Clues ? Known issue ? I've dual processor P3 (Intel motherboard on ServerWorks) that was rock solid long time ago till early 4.8-STABLE. Once upgraded to 4.9-STABLE, it started to hang every night (not at the same day time, though). It won't break out to the kernel debugger too so I have no information for the PR. That occured 5 times. I've downgraded it to 4.8-STABLE of 8 August 2003 and it is stable again. Eugene Grosbein From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 00:43:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBD716A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:43:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pathfinder.roks.biz (roks.biz [212.110.133.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52ACA43FDF for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:43:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from temp@roks.biz) Received: from admin.office.roks.biz (admin.office.roks.biz [192.168.100.103]) by pathfinder.roks.biz (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAI8YAwU048295; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:34:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from temp@roks.biz) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:34:05 +0200 From: Nikolay Pavlov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <345550821.20031118103405@roks.biz> To: David Malone In-Reply-To: <20031116215732.GA96823@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: <1655795183.20031107160844@roks.biz> <20031116215732.GA96823@walton.maths.tcd.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: PR bin/51253 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolay Pavlov List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:43:12 -0000 Hi, David. DM> I've just committed the following patch to -current, which I think DM> should fix your problem (and other similar potential problems). DM> I'll MFC the fix in a couple of weeks, all going according to plan. DM> David. DM> Index: syslogd.c DM> =================================================================== DM> RCS file: /cvs/FreeBSD-CVS/src/usr.sbin/syslogd/syslogd.c,v DM> retrieving revision 1.116 DM> diff -u -r1.116 syslogd.c DM> --- syslogd.c 17 May 2003 20:07:54 -0000 1.116 DM> +++ syslogd.c 16 Nov 2003 20:45:40 -0000 DM> @@ -1338,7 +1338,12 @@ DM> logerror(const char *type) DM> { DM> char buf[512]; DM> + static int recursed = 0; DM> + /* If there's an error while trying to log an error, give up. */ DM> + if (recursed) DM> + return; DM> + recursed++; DM> if (errno) DM> (void)snprintf(buf, DM> sizeof buf, "syslogd: %s: %s", type, strerror(errno)); DM> @@ -1347,6 +1352,7 @@ DM> errno = 0; DM> dprintf("%s\n", buf); DM> logmsg(LOG_SYSLOG|LOG_ERR, buf, LocalHostName, ADDDATE); DM> + recursed--; DM> } DM> static void Your patch works excellent for my 4.9 box, thanks that found time for this. -- Thanks, Nikolay. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 00:57:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4761216A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:57:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C80D43FD7 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:57:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 430F35308; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:57:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id E170E530D; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:56:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id CA56A33C68; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:56:56 +0100 (CET) To: Colin Percival References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031117165641.03101720@popserver.sfu.ca> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:56:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20031117165641.03101720@popserver.sfu.ca> (Colin Percival's message of "Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:00:16 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: ss X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: Carol Overes cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Secure updating of OS and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:57:15 -0000 Colin Percival writes: > At 06:02 17/11/2003 -0800, Carol Overes wrote: > > I'm thinking of updating kernel and binaries with > > patches form ftp.freebsd.org which are siganed with > > the PGP key of the security officers. However, this > > has to be hand-made patching. Does anyone know a > > secure way via for example cvsup ? > CVSup is insecure. FreeBSD Update might do what you want, but > you'd have to trust me. :) ...and three-hundred-odd FreeBSD developers. At some point you just have to stop doubting and start trusting. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 04:57:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6751516A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 04:57:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21F743FBD for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 04:57:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2003111812574801500ocmmce>; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:57:48 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id DBE9256; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:57:47 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: References: <002e01c3ad8b$bfaa6320$6401a8c0@luis> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 18 Nov 2003 07:57:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <002e01c3ad8b$bfaa6320$6401a8c0@luis> Message-ID: <44ad6tx29g.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make error on kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:57:49 -0000 writes: > I currently run 5.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jun 5 02:55:42 GMT 2003 > Trying to upgrade to something higher.. > > > Any suggestions on what to do? Ask on the -CURRENT list. 5.x is -CURRENT; -STABLE is 4.x. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html (and if you haven't read it already, http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.1R/early-adopter.html as well) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 05:34:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBE316A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 05:34:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CAE43F93 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 05:33:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.166] helo=localhost) by tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AM5zP-0007W0-PC for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:33:55 +0000 Received: from rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.165]) by localhost (scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 28657-08 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:33:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.161.253]) by rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AM5zP-0007Vo-Bn for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:33:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 27033 invoked by uid 0); 18 Nov 2003 13:33:55 -0000 Received: from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk by gateway by uid 71 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (sweep: 2.14/3.71. spamassassin: 2.53. Clear:. Processed in 1.28122 secs); 18 Nov 2003 13:33:55 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk via gateway X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 1.28122 secs) Received: from dhcp1131.wadham.ox.ac.uk (HELO piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk) (163.1.161.131) by gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk with SMTP; 18 Nov 2003 13:33:54 -0000 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.1.20031118133154.0318b7c8@popserver.sfu.ca> X-Sender: cperciva@popserver.sfu.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:33:44 +0000 To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ), freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031117165641.03101720@popserver.sfu.ca> <5.0.2.1.1.20031117165641.03101720@popserver.sfu.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: Carol Overes Subject: Re: Secure updating of OS and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:34:07 -0000 At 09:56 18/11/2003 +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >Colin Percival writes: > > CVSup is insecure. FreeBSD Update might do what you want, but > > you'd have to trust me. :) > >...and three-hundred-odd FreeBSD developers. True, but there's a slight difference there -- people can look at the=20 FreeBSD source code, but it's rather difficult to audit the binary updates= =20 I publish. Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 07:22:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177BA16A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:22:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from cedar.ie.tusur.ru (fet-gw-ppp.ttk.tusur.ru [212.192.163.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E348643FBF for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:21:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pg@rainbow.ie.tusur.ru) Received: from rainbow.ie.tusur.ru (rainbow.ie.tusur.ru [212.192.122.75]) by cedar.ie.tusur.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAIFDhvK071902 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:13:43 +0600 (TSK) (envelope-from pg@rainbow.ie.tusur.ru) Received: from rainbow.ie.tusur.ru (localhost.ie.tusur.ru [127.0.0.1]) by rainbow.ie.tusur.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAIFDhQ5012183 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:13:43 +0600 (TSK) (envelope-from pg@rainbow.ie.tusur.ru) Received: (from pg@localhost) by rainbow.ie.tusur.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.8/Submit) id hAIFDgoH012182 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:13:42 +0600 (TSK) (envelope-from pg) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:13:42 +0600 From: Pavel Gubin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031118151342.GG1710@ie.tusur.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: TUCSR, Industrial Electronics dept Subject: DOWNgrading 4.9-REL -> 4.8-REL... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:22:34 -0000 ...using make buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster is The Right Way? -- Pavel Gubin TUSC&R / Industrial Electronics dept / System Administrator 2:5005/14@fidonet / Phone +7-3822-423067 / ICQ 28835566 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 08:33:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5F416A4CF for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:33:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C031143F75 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:33:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAIGXQeG058220; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:33:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:32:02 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20031118.093202.131522893.imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031117165641.03101720@popserver.sfu.ca> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: caroloveres@yahoo.com cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk Subject: Re: Secure updating of OS and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:33:32 -0000 In message: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes: : Colin Percival writes: : > At 06:02 17/11/2003 -0800, Carol Overes wrote: : > > I'm thinking of updating kernel and binaries with : > > patches form ftp.freebsd.org which are siganed with : > > the PGP key of the security officers. However, this : > > has to be hand-made patching. Does anyone know a : > > secure way via for example cvsup ? : > CVSup is insecure. FreeBSD Update might do what you want, but : > you'd have to trust me. :) : = : ...and three-hundred-odd FreeBSD developers. : = : At some point you just have to stop doubting and start trusting. cvsup is secure from everything except man in the middle or redirection attacks. When you run cvsup over an ssh-tunnel, you can solve these problems if you trust the cvsup running on the localhost you ssh to. Warner From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 08:42:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC11316A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:42:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E99143FDD for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:42:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.162] helo=localhost) by tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AM8wJ-00007S-KD for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:42:55 +0000 Received: from rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.161]) by localhost (scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 00428-01 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:42:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.161.253]) by rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AM8wJ-00007F-6Y for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:42:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 14502 invoked by uid 0); 18 Nov 2003 16:42:54 -0000 Received: from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk by gateway by uid 71 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (sweep: 2.14/3.71. spamassassin: 2.53. Clear:. Processed in 1.227139 secs); 18 Nov 2003 16:42:54 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk via gateway X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 1.227139 secs) Received: from dhcp1131.wadham.ox.ac.uk (HELO piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk) (163.1.161.131) by gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk with SMTP; 18 Nov 2003 16:42:53 -0000 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.1.20031118163606.031db020@popserver.sfu.ca> X-Sender: cperciva@popserver.sfu.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:42:52 +0000 To: "M. Warner Losh" , des@des.no From: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: <20031118.093202.131522893.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031117165641.03101720@popserver.sfu.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: caroloveres@yahoo.com cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk Subject: Re: Secure updating of OS and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:42:58 -0000 At 09:32 18/11/2003 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: >cvsup is secure from everything except man in the middle or >redirection attacks. When you run cvsup over an ssh-tunnel, you can >solve these problems if you trust the cvsup running on the localhost >you ssh to. In other words, cvsup -- as the general public uses it -- is secure, provided that you trust your DNS servers, the FreeBSD DNS servers, the cvsup mirror you access, and everyone with access to the local network segments on which the above reside. It's *almost* as secure as http -- but not quite, since the mirror system provides another point of attack. If everyone used ssh tunnels to cvsup-master, this wouldn't be an issue... but that isn't an option. Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 09:24:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C440C16A4CF for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:24:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ngfl.dialnet.com (ngmail.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7F743FDF for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:24:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) Received: from ngmfilt.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.121] by ngfl.dialnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A51F10130138; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:21:35 +0000 Received: from relay.ngfl.dialnet.com (unverified) by ngmfilt.ngfl.dialnet.com for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:21:27 +0000 Received: from firewall.cardinalnewman.lan ( [172.30.0.70]) by ngrelay.dialnet.com with SMTP (MailShield v2.04 - WIN32 Jul 17 2001 17:12:42); Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:22:44 -0000 Received: from mail.cardinalnewman.lan (mail.cardinalnewman.lan [192.168.0.3]) hAIHOKgI000320 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:24:20 GMT (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) Received: from dumpster.cardinalnewman.lan (dumpster.cardinalnewman.lan [192.168.0.9])hAIHOJcr083868 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:24:19 GMT (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) From: ict technician Organization: Cardinal Newman School To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:24:18 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311181724.18225.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=USER_AGENT_KMAIL version=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (mail.cardinalnewman.lan) X-SMTP-HELO: firewall.cardinalnewman.lan X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: [172.30.0.70] Subject: panic ffs_blkfree bad size X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:24:30 -0000 This is on a 4.8-RELEASE system. I know this is ancient but the referenced code doesn't seem to have changed much. This is our samba file server. We've been getting reboots every 20 days or so. vinum RAID10 if that matters. dmesg/WHY on request. I am not a kernel hacker. dumpster# gdb -k^M GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd". (kgdb) stmymbol-file ke^Grnel.d^Gebug Reading symbols from kernel.debug...Deprecated bfd_read called at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dbxread.c line 2627 in elfstab_build_psymtabs Deprecated bfd_read called at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dbxread.c line 933 in fill_symbuf done. (kgdb) exec-file ke^Grnel.4 (kgdb) core-file vm^Gcore.4 IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x003c4000 initial pcb at physical address 0x0031f6a0 panicstr: ffs_blkfree: bad size panic messages: --- panic: ffs_blkfree: bad size syncing disks... 154 21 done Uptime: 18d20h25m18s dumping to dev #da/0x20001, offset 1048704 dump 1535 1534 1533 1532 1531 1530 1529 1528 1527 1526 1525 1524 1523 1522 1521 1520 1519 1518 1517 1516 1515 1514 1513 1512 1511 1510 1509 1508 1507 1506 1505 1504 1503 1502 1501 1500 1499 1498 1497 1496 1495 1494 1493 1492 1491 1490 1489 1488 1487 1486 1485 1484 1483 1482 1481 1480 1479 1478 1477 1476 1475 1474 1473 1472 1471 1470 1469 1468 1467 1466 1465 1464 1463 1462 1461 1460 1459 1458 1457 1456 1455 1454 1453 1452 1451 1450 1449 1448 144 7 1446 1445 1444 1443 1442 1441 1440 1439 1438 1437 1436 1435 1434 1433 1432 1431 1430 1429 1428 1427 1426 1425 1424 1423 1422 1421 1420 1419 1418 1417 1416 1415 1414 1413 1412 1411 1410 1409 1408 1407 1406 1405 1404 1403 14 02 1401 1400 1399 1398 1397 1396 1395 1394 1393 1392 1391 1390 1389 1388 1387 1386 1385 1384 1383 1382 1381 1380 1379 1378 1377 1376 1375 1374 1373 1372 1371 1370 1369 1368 1367 1366 1365 1364 1363 1362 1361 1360 1359 1358 1 357 1356 1355 1354 1353 1352 1351 1350 1349 1348 1347 1346 1345 1344 1343 1342 1341 1340 1339 1338 1337 1336 1335 1334 1333 1332 1331 1330 1329 1328 1327 1326 1325 1324 1323 1322 1321 1320 1319 1318 1317 1316 1315 1314 1313 1312 1311 1310 1309 1308 1307 1306 1305 1304 1303 1302 1301 1300 1299 1298 1297 1296 1295 1294 1293 1292 1291 1290 1289 1288 1287 1286 1285 1284 1283 1282 1281 1280 1279 1278 1277 1276 1275 1274 1273 1272 1271 1270 1269 1268 1267 1266 1265 1264 1263 1262 1261 1260 1259 1258 1257 1256 1255 1254 1253 1252 1251 1250 1249 1248 1247 1246 1245 1244 1243 1242 1241 1240 1239 1238 1237 1236 1235 1234 1233 1232 1231 1230 1229 1228 1227 1226 1225 1224 122 3 1222 1221 1220 1219 1218 1217 1216 1215 1214 1213 1212 1211 1210 1209 1208 1207 1206 1205 1204 1203 1202 1201 1200 1199 1198 1197 1196 1195 1194 1193 1192 1191 1190 1189 1188 1187 1186 1185 1184 1183 1182 1181 1180 1179 11 78 1177 1176 1175 1174 1173 1172 1171 1170 1169 1168 1167 1166 1165 1164 1163 1162 1161 1160 1159 1158 1157 1156 1155 1154 1153 1152 1151 1150 1149 1148 1147 1146 1145 1144 1143 1142 1141 1140 1139 1138 1137 1136 1135 1134 1 133 1132 1131 1130 1129 1128 1127 1126 1125 1124 1123 1122 1121 1120 1119 1118 1117 1116 1115 1114 1113 1112 1111 1110 1109 1108 1107 1106 1105 1104 1103 1102 1101 1100 1099 1098 1097 1096 1095 1094 1093 1092 1091 1090 1089 1088 1087 1086 1085 1084 1083 1082 1081 1080 1079 1078 1077 1076 1075 1074 1073 1072 1071 1070 1069 1068 1067 1066 1065 1064 1063 1062 1061 1060 1059 1058 1057 1056 1055 1054 1053 1052 1051 1050 1049 1048 1047 1046 1045 1044 1043 1042 1041 1040 1039 1038 1037 1036 1035 1034 1033 1032 1031 1030 1029 1028 1027 1026 1025 1024 1023 1022 1021 1020 1019 1018 1017 1016 1015 1014 1013 1012 1011 1010 1009 1008 1007 1006 1005 1004 1003 1002 1001 1000 999 998 997 996 995 994 993 992 991 990 989 988 987 986 985 984 983 982 981 980 979 978 977 976 975 974 973 972 971 970 969 968 967 966 965 964 963 962 961 960 959 958 957 956 955 954 953 952 951 950 949 948 947 946 945 944 943 942 941 940 939 938 937 936 935 934 933 932 931 930 929 928 927 926 925 924 923 922 921 920 919 918 917 916 915 914 913 912 911 910 909 908 907 906 905 904 903 902 901 900 899 898 897 896 895 894 893 892 891 890 889 888 887 886 885 884 883 882 881 880 879 878 877 876 875 874 873 872 871 870 869 868 867 866 865 864 863 862 861 860 859 858 857 856 855 854 853 852 851 850 849 848 847 846 845 844 843 842 841 840 839 838 837 836 835 834 833 832 831 830 829 828 827 826 825 824 823 822 821 820 819 818 817 816 815 814 813 812 811 810 809 808 807 806 805 804 803 802 801 800 799 798 797 796 795 794 793 792 791 790 789 788 787 786 785 784 783 782 781 780 779 778 777 776 775 774 773 772 771 770 769 768 767 766 765 764 763 762 761 760 759 758 757 756 755 754 753 752 751 750 749 748 747 746 745 744 743 742 741 740 739 738 737 736 735 734 733 732 731 730 729 728 727 726 725 724 723 722 721 720 719 718 717 716 715 714 713 712 711 710 709 708 707 706 705 704 703 702 701 700 699 698 697 696 695 694 693 692 691 690 689 688 687 686 685 684 683 682 681 680 679 678 677 676 675 674 673 672 671 670 669 668 667 666 665 664 663 662 661 660 659 658 657 656 655 654 653 652 651 650 649 648 647 646 645 644 643 642 641 640 639 638 637 636 635 634 633 632 631 630 629 628 627 626 625 624 623 622 621 620 619 618 617 616 615 614 613 612 611 610 609 608 607 606 605 604 603 602 601 600 599 598 597 596 595 594 593 592 591 590 589 588 587 586 585 584 583 582 581 580 579 578 577 576 575 574 573 572 571 570 569 568 567 566 565 564 563 562 561 560 559 558 557 556 555 554 553 552 551 550 549 548 547 546 545 544 543 542 541 540 539 538 537 536 535 534 533 532 531 530 529 528 527 526 525 524 523 522 521 520 519 518 517 516 515 514 513 512 511 510 509 508 507 506 505 504 503 502 501 500 499 498 497 496 495 494 493 492 491 490 489 488 487 486 485 484 483 482 481 480 479 478 477 476 475 474 473 472 471 470 469 468 467 466 465 464 463 462 461 460 459 458 457 456 455 454 453 452 451 450 449 448 447 446 445 444 443 442 441 440 439 438 437 436 435 434 433 432 431 430 429 428 427 426 425 424 423 422 421 420 419 418 417 416 415 414 413 412 411 410 409 408 407 406 405 404 403 402 401 400 399 398 397 396 395 394 393 392 391 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 381 380 379 378 377 376 375 374 373 372 371 370 369 368 367 366 365 364 363 362 361 360 359 358 357 356 355 354 353 352 351 350 349 348 347 346 345 344 343 342 341 340 339 338 337 336 335 334 333 332 331 330 329 328 327 326 325 324 323 322 321 320 319 318 317 316 315 314 313 312 311 310 309 308 307 306 305 304 303 302 301 300 299 298 297 296 295 294 293 292 291 290 289 288 287 286 285 284 283 282 281 280 279 278 277 276 275 274 273 272 271 270 269 268 267 266 265 264 263 262 261 260 259 258 257 256 255 254 253 252 251 250 249 248 247 246 245 244 243 242 241 240 239 238 237 236 235 234 233 232 231 230 229 228 227 226 225 224 223 222 221 220 219 218 217 216 215 214 213 212 211 210 209 208 207 206 205 204 203 202 201 200 199 198 197 196 195 194 193 192 191 190 189 188 187 186 185 184 183 182 181 180 179 178 177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 163 162 161 160 159 158 157 156 155 154 153 152 151 150 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142 141 140 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 132 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 2 9 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 --- #0 0xc017d98a in dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 487 if (dumping++) { (kgdb) bt #0 0xc017d98a in dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 #1 0xc3f0e694 in ?? () #2 0xc017d75b in boot (howto=256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:319 #3 0xc017db80 in poweroff_wait (junk=0xc02db435, howto=-1070746624) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:612 #4 0xc02494b3 in ffs_blkfree (ip=0xe3654e0c, bno=109, size=4096) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c:1421 #5 0xc024dd6e in handle_workitem_freeblocks (freeblks=0xc7142880) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:2153 #6 0xc024c1eb in process_worklist_item (matchmnt=0x0, flags=0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:741 #7 0xc024c07e in softdep_process_worklist (matchmnt=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:664 #8 0xc01ab503 in sched_sync () at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:1201 (kgdb) up 4 #4 0xc02494b3 in ffs_blkfree (ip=0xe3654e0c, bno=109, size=4096) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c:1421 1421 ffs_fserr(fs, ip->i_uid, "bad block"); (kgdb) list 1396,1421 1396 ffs_blkfree(ip, bno, size) 1397 register struct inode *ip; 1398 ufs_daddr_t bno; 1399 long size; 1400 { 1401 register struct fs *fs; 1402 register struct cg *cgp; 1403 struct buf *bp; 1404 ufs_daddr_t blkno; 1405 int i, error, cg, blk, frags, bbase; 1406 u_int8_t *blksfree; 1407 1408 fs = ip->i_fs; 1409 VOP_FREEBLKS(ip->i_devvp, fsbtodb(fs, bno), size); 1410 if ((u_int)size > fs->fs_bsize || fragoff(fs, size) != 0 || 1411 fragnum(fs, bno) + numfrags(fs, size) > fs->fs_frag) { 1412 printf("dev=%s, bno = %ld, bsize = %ld, size = %ld, fs = %s\n", 1413 devtoname(ip->i_dev), (long)bno, (long)fs->fs_bsize, size, 1414 fs->fs_fsmnt); 1415 panic("ffs_blkfree: bad size"); 1416 } 1417 cg = dtog(fs, bno); 1418 if ((u_int)bno >= fs->fs_size) { 1419 printf("bad block %ld, ino %lu\n", 1420 (long)bno, (u_long)ip->i_number); 1421 ffs_fserr(fs, ip->i_uid, "bad block"); (kgdb) print fs $1 = (struct fs *) 0x0 (kgdb) print ip->inode_u.fs $2 = (struct fs *) 0xc3fea000 (kgdb) print ip->i_devvp $3 = (struct vnode *) 0xe36440c0 (kgdb) print bno $4 = 109 (kgdb) print size $5 = 0 (kgdb) quit repeat after me: Macros are evil :)) -- i j hart ICT Technician Cardinal Newman Catholic School & Community College From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 11:28:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A28416A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:28:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421CA43F93 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:28:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMBWW-0004As-00 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:28:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMBWV-0004Ae-00 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:28:27 +0100 Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMBWV-0000BH-00 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:28:27 +0100 From: othermark Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:28:26 -0800 Lines: 29 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 Sender: news Subject: Packet Engines, Inc. G-NIC II 1000BT Network Interface Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 19:28:30 -0000 Hi, I want to get this device working with -stable: none1@pci2:2:0: class=0x020000 card=0x13180001 chip=0x09111318 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Packet Engines, Inc.' device = 'G-NIC II 1000BT Network Interface Card' class = network subclass = ethernet this page http://www.scl.ameslab.gov/Projects/Gigabit/drivers/PacketEngines.html lists a 2.2.2 driver. However I noticed http://www.freebsd.org/donations/donors.html includes a donation of this card to will@freebsd.org. Is there a current driver? I can't find one in /usr/src/sys. Does anyone have this card working with -current or -stable? Any help is much appreciated. -- othermark atkin901 at nospam dot yahoo dot com (!wired)?(coffee++):(wired); From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 11:41:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2108C16A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:41:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp5.wanadoo.nl (smtp5.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2517B43FAF for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:41:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from ams-gw.sohara.org (p0222.nas3-asd6.dial.wanadoo.nl [62.234.216.222]) by smtp5.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id AE8E578243; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:41:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:40:56 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Colin Percival Message-Id: <20031118204056.66a9cf7a.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20031118163606.031db020@popserver.sfu.ca> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031117165641.03101720@popserver.sfu.ca> <5.0.2.1.1.20031118163606.031db020@popserver.sfu.ca> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX,Kv^-GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: des@des.no cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk cc: imp@bsdimp.com cc: caroloveres@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Secure updating of OS and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 19:41:05 -0000 On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:42:52 +0000 Colin Percival wrote: ... CP> segments on which the above reside. It's *almost* as secure as http CP> -- but not quite, since the mirror system provides another point of CP> attack. CP> If everyone used ssh tunnels to cvsup-master, this wouldn't be an CP> issue... but that isn't an option. You could raise the bar by pulling the repository from one mirror and the source tree from another and doing a cvs diff. Refer to the mirrors by IP address to push the DNS issue out of the way. Confirm connections with netstat -anf inet once established. Wait 24 hours before deploying - if anything got through that lot it is likely to be widespread and noticed or someone very determined who has it in for you. -- C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see: | http://www.sohara.org/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 12:57:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9232916A4CF for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.omnis.com (smtp.omnis.com [216.239.128.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014CD43FDD for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:57:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from salty.rapid.stbernard.com (corp-2.ipinc.com [199.245.188.2]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8529472D94; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:56:31 -0800 (PST) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr.com To: othermark , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:56:58 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311181256.58604.wes@softweyr.com> Subject: Re: Packet Engines, Inc. G-NIC II 1000BT Network Interface Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:57:10 -0000 On Tuesday 18 November 2003 11:28, othermark wrote: > Hi, > > I want to get this device working with -stable: > > none1@pci2:2:0: class=0x020000 card=0x13180001 chip=0x09111318 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Packet Engines, Inc.' > device = 'G-NIC II 1000BT Network Interface Card' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > this page > > http://www.scl.ameslab.gov/Projects/Gigabit/drivers/PacketEngines.htm >l > > lists a 2.2.2 driver. However I noticed > > http://www.freebsd.org/donations/donors.html includes a donation of > this card to will@freebsd.org. Is there a current driver? I can't > find one in /usr/src/sys. Does anyone have this card working with > -current or -stable? The yellowfin got rolled over by the GigE marketplace steamroller. Packet Engines was completely uncooperative with the open source community. I couldn't get docs on the chip even after my employer bought them. Now you can buy cards with better performance for 1/10 the price. Throw it away and get an EEPro/1000, roughly $45 these days. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 20:00:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8ED016A4CE; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:00:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from ntmk.tagil.ru (ntmk.tagil.ru [195.151.0.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31ACE43F85; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:00:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from boris@tagnet.ru) Received: from tagnet.ru (boris.nikom.ru [10.1.16.195]) by ntmk.tagil.ru (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA45164; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:00:01 +0500 (YEKT) Message-ID: <3FBAEAC1.7090709@tagnet.ru> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:00:01 +0500 From: Boris Kovalenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: brian@Awfulhak.org, freebsd-stable , freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ppp RADIUS accounting bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 04:00:22 -0000 Hello! I found a serious bug in RADIUS accounting code. The problem is that OctetsIn and OctetsOut are defined as unsingned long long, but the RADIUS supports only INT32 values, so, when we're doing rad_put_int(r->cx.rad, RAD_ACCT_OUTPUT_OCTETS, stats->OctetsOut) in radius.c for OctetsOut (and OctetsIn also) we loosing information if OctetsOut is greater then INT32_MAX. This should be fixed. Regards, Boris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 22:11:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EC616A4CE; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:11:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from fed1mtao03.cox.net (fed1mtao03.cox.net [68.6.19.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827F543FE5; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:11:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jjreynold@ip68-2-101-74.ph.ph.cox.net) Received: from ip68-2-101-74.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.2.101.74]) by fed1mtao03.cox.netESMTP <20031119061140.BKST28419.fed1mtao03.cox.net@ip68-2-101-74.ph.ph.cox.net>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:11:40 -0500 Received: from whale.home-net (whale.home-net [192.168.1.2]) hAJ6BeNF004655; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:11:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jjreynold@dolphin.home-net) Received: from whale.home-net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whale.home-net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAJ6BexF095011; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:11:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jjreynold@whale.home-net) Received: (from jjreynold@localhost) by whale.home-net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hAJ6Bd4d095008; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:11:39 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jjreynold) From: John Reynolds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16315.2459.457793.876084@whale.home-net> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:11:39 -0700 To: ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under Emacs 21.3.1 cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: Mariusz Woloszyn Subject: call for testers -- changes to libusb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:11:44 -0000 Hello -ports & -stable. Sorry for the cross-post, but it is appropriate as I'm hoping to get the help of people running -STABLE (who might not be subscribed to -ports). I have an unchecked-in version of libusb-0.1.7 with patches to fix some behavior problems. In short, it is alledged that the original port from Linux to FreeBSD didn't need to "loop until done" in the bulk_read/bulk_write functions as the Linux port does. For those interested, see the thread here: http://lists.inteltec.com/wws/arc/usb-bsd/2003-11/msg00021.html The authors/contributors of the patch have tested it with gphoto[2] and many different cameras. I have tested the patch with my own little pet port "s10sh" and it seems to operate totally fine. However, I'm on (an outdated) -CURRENT system and not longer have a -STABLE system to test with. Please backup your currently installed package, delete libusb-0.1.7, fetch the following .tbz fetch 'http://www.reynoldsnet.org/libusb-0.1.7_1.tbz' MD5 (liibusb-0.1.7_1.tbz) = c33b84b0f45cacea982a90553c8f323c pkg_add it, and test your app that links to it. Specifically I'm looking for anybody who is currently using an application other than gPhoto2 or s10sh. I know that sane (or sane-backend) links to this library, but I don't have a USB scanner so I have no way of knowing if things are cool or not. Off the top of my head I can't remember other ports that depend on libusb, but if you use one of them regularly, please test this. If I get no negative feedback within a couple of days I will followup on ports/58925 with a patch to bring in this patch until we can get the code changes into libusb itself and 0.1.8 rolled (I can do the former, but not the latter). Thanks! -Jr -- John & Jennifer Reynolds johnjen at reynoldsnet.org www.reynoldsnet.org Structural / Physical Design - ICG/PNG SCD jreynold at sedona.ch.intel.com Running FreeBSD since 2.1.5-RELEASE. FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! "Unix is user friendly, it's just particular about the friends it chooses." From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 23:17:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BB616A4CE; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:17:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pit.databus.com (p70-227.acedsl.com [66.114.70.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1F143FE0; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:17:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: from pit.databus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pit.databus.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAJ7H4Tb039365; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 02:17:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: (from barney@localhost) by pit.databus.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hAJ7H3sq039364; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 02:17:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from barney) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 02:17:03 -0500 From: Barney Wolff To: Boris Kovalenko Message-ID: <20031119071703.GA38863@pit.databus.com> References: <3FBAEAC1.7090709@tagnet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FBAEAC1.7090709@tagnet.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.38 cc: brian@Awfulhak.org cc: freebsd-current cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: ppp RADIUS accounting bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 07:17:16 -0000 On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:00:01AM +0500, Boris Kovalenko wrote: > > I found a serious bug in RADIUS accounting code. The problem is that > OctetsIn and OctetsOut are defined as unsingned long long, but the > RADIUS supports only INT32 values, so, when > we're doing rad_put_int(r->cx.rad, RAD_ACCT_OUTPUT_OCTETS, > stats->OctetsOut) in radius.c for OctetsOut (and OctetsIn also) we > loosing information if OctetsOut is greater then INT32_MAX. This should > be fixed. Note that RADIUS integers are unsigned, so the limit is 2^32-1. Also, RFC2869 defines attributes to hold the high-order parts. -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 01:14:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BB916A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:14:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from dn.farlep.net (ns.dn.farlep.net [213.130.10.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6B043FDD for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:14:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from admin@dru.dn.ua) Received: from dru.dn.ua (dru.dn.ua [213.130.20.58] (may be forged)) by dn.farlep.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/dnfarlep / z; delivery of UCE (a.k.a. SPAM), or any other message without the express permission of Farlep-Telecom-Holding is prohibited. Use of this system for third party relaying is prohibited.) with ESMTP id hAJ9ECXD075832 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:14:12 +0200 (EET) Posted-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:14:12 +0200 (EET) Received: (from admin@localhost) by dru.dn.ua (8.12.9/8.12.9) id hAJ9E7aU012323; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:14:07 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from admin) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:14:07 +0200 From: "Vladislav V. Zhuk" To: ict technician Message-ID: <20031119091407.GB11187@dru.dn.ua> References: <200311181724.18225.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311181724.18225.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic ffs_blkfree bad size X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:14:41 -0000 On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:24:18PM +0000, ict technician wrote: > This is on a 4.8-RELEASE system. I know this is ancient but the referenced > code doesn't seem to have changed much. > > This is our samba file server. We've been getting reboots every 20 days or so. > vinum RAID10 if that matters. dmesg/WHY on request. > > I am not a kernel hacker. I have some problem. FreeBSD 4.8-Stable (tag=RELENG_4 date=2003.08.08.03.00.00) HPT370 RAID1 with new HDD: ar0: 78533MB [10011/255/63] status: READY subdisks: 0 READY ad4: 78533MB [159560/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA100 1 READY ad6: 78533MB [159560/16/63] at ata3-master UDMA100 IBM Drive Fitness Test say no problem with HDDs. Who can help to fix this problem? -- Vladislav V. Zhuk (06267)3-60-03 admin@dru.dn.ua 2:465/197@FidoNet.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 01:19:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6DD16A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:19:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D9A43FCB for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:19:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 53781530C; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:19:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 6ADC75308; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:19:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id EBCA433C65; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:19:05 +0100 (CET) To: Pavel Gubin References: <20031118151342.GG1710@ie.tusur.ru> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:19:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20031118151342.GG1710@ie.tusur.ru> (Pavel Gubin's message of "Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:13:42 +0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: ss X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DOWNgrading 4.9-REL -> 4.8-REL... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:19:22 -0000 Pavel Gubin writes: > ...using > > make buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster > > is The Right Way? yes, with a reboot to single-user mode before installworld. but may I ask why you find it necessary to downgrade? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 02:59:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F11D16A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 02:59:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from access.inet.co.th (access.inet.co.th [203.151.127.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FD043FAF for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 02:59:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from firak.thai-aec.org (TruPPPv92-227-215.inet.co.th [203.151.227.215]) by access.inet.co.th (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id hAJAxjbC078186 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:59:47 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from firak.thai-aec.org (localhost.thai-aec.org [127.0.0.1]) by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAJAxLqL009477 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:59:21 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: (from pirat@localhost) by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hAJAxF0o008583 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:59:15 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) X-Authentication-Warning: firak.thai-aec.org: pirat set sender to pirat@access.inet.co.th using -f Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:59:14 +0700 From: pirat To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20031119105914.GA20096@thai-aec.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=tis-620 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD firak.thai-aec.org 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE www-home-page: http://www.thai-aec.org www-FreeBSD-page: http://www.thai.net/makham Subject: Dell Inspiron 1100 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:59:52 -0000 hi sirs, i have one notebook from dell, inspiron 1100. i would like to know if this notebook can be used with freebsd or not. it has on board broadcom nic. but the current os - linux TLE - does not `see' it also. thanks in advance for any helps and hints. -- with best regards, psr http://www.thai-aec.org http://www.thai.net/makham From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 03:18:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007B116A4CF for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 03:18:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ngfl.dialnet.com (ngmail.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A852343FB1 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 03:17:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) Received: from ngmfilt.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.121] by ngfl.dialnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A0B813A900A0; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:15:04 +0000 Received: from relay.ngfl.dialnet.com (unverified) by ngmfilt.ngfl.dialnet.com ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:14:59 +0000 Received: from firewall.cardinalnewman.lan ( [172.30.0.70]) by mail.bartoncourt.org with SMTP (MailShield v2.04 - WIN32 Jul 17 2001 17:12:42); Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:16:17 -0000 Received: from mail.cardinalnewman.lan (mail.cardinalnewman.lan [192.168.0.3]) hAJBHqgI002674; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:17:52 GMT (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) Received: from dumpster.cardinalnewman.lan (dumpster.cardinalnewman.lan [192.168.0.9])hAJBHqcr092567; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:17:52 GMT (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) From: ict technician Organization: Cardinal Newman School To: "Vladislav V. Zhuk" Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:17:51 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200311181724.18225.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> <20031119091407.GB11187@dru.dn.ua> In-Reply-To: <20031119091407.GB11187@dru.dn.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311191117.51485.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_KMAIL version=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (mail.cardinalnewman.lan) X-SMTP-HELO: firewall.cardinalnewman.lan X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: admin@dru.dn.ua X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: [172.30.0.70] cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic ffs_blkfree bad size X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:18:02 -0000 On Wednesday 19 November 2003 9:14 am, Vladislav V. Zhuk wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:24:18PM +0000, ict technician wrote: > > This is on a 4.8-RELEASE system. I know this is ancient but the > > referenced code doesn't seem to have changed much. > > > > This is our samba file server. We've been getting reboots every 20 days > > or so. vinum RAID10 if that matters. dmesg/WHY on request. > > > > I am not a kernel hacker. > > I have some problem. FreeBSD 4.8-Stable (tag=RELENG_4 > date=2003.08.08.03.00.00) HPT370 RAID1 with new HDD: > ar0: 78533MB [10011/255/63] status: READY subdisks: > 0 READY ad4: 78533MB [159560/16/63] at ata2-master > UDMA100 1 READY ad6: 78533MB [159560/16/63] at > ata3-master UDMA100 > > IBM Drive Fitness Test say no problem with HDDs. > > Who can help to fix this problem? > > -- > Vladislav V. Zhuk (06267)3-60-03 admin@dru.dn.ua 2:465/197@FidoNet.org Unless your error is the same as $subject, you should start a new thread, rather than hijacking this one. -- i j hart ICT Technician Cardinal Newman Catholic School & Community College From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 03:46:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BE316A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 03:46:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from tnpsmtp.telenor.se (franklin.telenor.se [213.150.135.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6EB43F93 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 03:46:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from parlei@kairos.algonet.se) Received: from kairos.algonet.se (kairos.algonet.se [213.150.135.237]) by franklin.telenor.se (BMR ErlangTM/OTP 3.1) with ESMTP id 947311.242404.1069.0s7729151franklin for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:46:44 +0100 Received: (qmail 16549 invoked by uid 100794); 19 Nov 2003 11:46:42 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:46:42 +0100 From: Par Leijonhufvud To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031119114642.GA16005@kairos.algonet.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: Problems with Rhine III card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:46:53 -0000 Running 4.8-stable on an old P200 box. I'm having problems with getting a d-link DFE-530TX (apparently a Rhine III card in reality) to work. During boot I get (probably with lots of typos; I had to copy it to paper and retype on another machine): /kernel: vr0: port 0x6400-0x64ff mem 0xe1000000-0xe10000ff irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 /kernel: vr0: Ethernet address 00:05:5d:93:5b:61 /kernel: miibus0: on vr0 Once the the boot is done I can ping the IP that ifconfig gives as my own, but any external one fails. When I try to run dhclient I get errors: /kernel: vr0 : Using force reset command routed: faith0 has a bad address routed IP_DROP_MEMORY ALLHOSTS : can't assign requested address routed[56]: 0.0.0.0 --> 213.132.119.1 dissapeared from kernel dhclient : send_packet : Address familly not supported by protocol family. The last line gets repeated a bunch of times. Any suggestions? /Par -- Par Leijonhufvud par@hunter-gatherer.org Cunning and deceit will every time serve a man better than force. -- Niccolo Machiavelli From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 04:46:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC8816A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 04:46:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from saeab.se (ture.saeab.se [213.80.3.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C749043FD7 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 04:46:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thn@saeab.se) Received: from saeab.se (omar.int.saeab.se [10.0.1.32]) by saeab.se (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAJCkH58070166; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:46:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from thn@saeab.se) Message-ID: <3FBB661A.A77DEF5@saeab.se> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:46:18 +0100 From: Thomas Nystrom Organization: Sv. Aktuell Elektronik AB X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: sv,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Par Leijonhufvud References: <20031119114642.GA16005@kairos.algonet.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ture.saeab.se cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with Rhine III card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:46:22 -0000 Par Leijonhufvud wrote: > > Running 4.8-stable on an old P200 box. > > I'm having problems with getting a d-link DFE-530TX (apparently a Rhine > III card in reality) to work. > Shouldn't be any problem. I have such a thing in an old box running 4.9R. > During boot I get (probably with lots of typos; I had to copy it to > paper and retype on another machine): > > /kernel: vr0: port 0x6400-0x64ff mem 0xe1000000-0xe10000ff irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 > /kernel: vr0: Ethernet address 00:05:5d:93:5b:61 > /kernel: miibus0: on vr0 It should have said someting about ukphy0: bla-bla on miibus0 also, right? > > Once the the boot is done I can ping the IP that ifconfig gives as my > own, but any external one fails. > What does an 'ifconfig vr0' say? Have you checked the cable? Can you see if the other end indicates that it have a working link? /thn -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Svensk Aktuell Elektronik AB Thomas Nyström Box 10 Phone: +46 8 35 92 85 S-191 21 Sollentuna Fax: +46 8 35 92 86 Sweden Email: thn@saeab.se --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 04:54:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB7C16A4CE; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 04:54:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from cedar.ie.tusur.ru (fet-gw-ppp.ttk.tusur.ru [212.192.163.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405F943FBD; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 04:54:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pg@rainbow.ie.tusur.ru) Received: from rainbow.ie.tusur.ru (rainbow.ie.tusur.ru [212.192.122.75]) by cedar.ie.tusur.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAJCmMvK005422; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:48:26 +0600 (TSK) (envelope-from pg@rainbow.ie.tusur.ru) Received: from rainbow.ie.tusur.ru (localhost.ie.tusur.ru [127.0.0.1]) by rainbow.ie.tusur.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAJCmLQ5047092; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:48:21 +0600 (TSK) (envelope-from pg@rainbow.ie.tusur.ru) Received: (from pg@localhost) by rainbow.ie.tusur.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.8/Submit) id hAJCmFca047088; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:48:15 +0600 (TSK) (envelope-from pg) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:48:15 +0600 From: Pavel Gubin To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20031119124815.GD37034@ie.tusur.ru> References: <20031118151342.GG1710@ie.tusur.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: TUCSR, Industrial Electronics dept cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DOWNgrading 4.9-REL -> 4.8-REL... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:54:53 -0000 On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:19:05AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > make buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster > > > > is The Right Way? > > yes, with a reboot to single-user mode before installworld. Hmm.. :) I was too lazy to reboot one more time, i just kill suspicious processes like cron, sendmail etc. :) > but may I ask why you find it necessary to downgrade? See followup to PR kern/57174 for details :( Shortly, my Maxtor 6Y200 attached to CMD648 controller brings the system into panic, and without using tags. Maximum uptime was about 30 minutes :( I looked into ata(4) code and decided that there is some logic error (especially taking into account that panic() in ata(4) 4.9 appeared after significant rewrite ata_dmastart() code). Then, after downgrading my system in question to 4.8-p13 - flight is excellent, 1 day ok. I really want to eliminate this error, but at least some days I cannot duplicate the same hardware configuration to investigate the problem... -- Pavel Gubin TUSC&R / Industrial Electronics dept / System Administrator 2:5005/14@fidonet / Phone +7-3822-423067 / ICQ 28835566 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 06:17:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F200416A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:17:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from tnpsmtp.telenor.se (franklin.telenor.se [213.150.135.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DE143F75 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:17:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from parlei@algonet.se) Received: from kairos.algonet.se (kairos.algonet.se [213.150.135.237]) by franklin.telenor.se (BMR ErlangTM/OTP 3.1) with ESMTP id 788667.251437.1069.0s7835414franklin ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:17:17 +0100 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:17:14 +0100 (MET) From: Par Leijonhufvud To: Thomas Nystrom In-Reply-To: <3FBB661A.A77DEF5@saeab.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Par Leijonhufvud cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with Rhine III card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:17:23 -0000 On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Thomas Nystrom wrote: > > /kernel: vr0: port 0x6400-0x64ff mem 0xe1000000-0xe10000ff irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 > > /kernel: vr0: Ethernet address 00:05:5d:93:5b:61 > > /kernel: miibus0: on vr0 > > It should have said someting about ukphy0: bla-bla on miibus0 also, > right? ukphy0: generic IEEE 802.3a media interface on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX,100baseTX,100baseTX-FDX,auto > What does an 'ifconfig vr0' say? vr0: flags8843 MTU 1500 inet 213.132.119.242 netmask Oxffffff00 broadcast 213.132.119.255 inet6 fe80::205:5dff:fe93:5b61%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 ether 00:05:5d:93:5b:61 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active > Have you checked the cable? Can you see if the other end indicates that > it have a working link? Looks the same on the DL 604 as the working link, and I've tried nicking the cable from a machine that works with no change. /Par -- Par Leijonhufvud par@hunter-gatherer.org I think, however, that you will find that, online or in realspace, entering an ongoing conversation and insulting the people conducting it is not a good way of obtaining information. --David Friedman From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 06:41:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCE416A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from saeab.se (ture.saeab.se [213.80.3.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F66B43F93 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:41:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thn@saeab.se) Received: from saeab.se (omar.int.saeab.se [10.0.1.32]) by saeab.se (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAJEfF58070731; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:41:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from thn@saeab.se) Message-ID: <3FBB810B.8BEEC8B3@saeab.se> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:41:15 +0100 From: Thomas Nystrom Organization: Sv. Aktuell Elektronik AB X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: sv,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Par Leijonhufvud References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ture.saeab.se cc: Par Leijonhufvud cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with Rhine III card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:41:20 -0000 Par Leijonhufvud wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Thomas Nystrom wrote: > > > > /kernel: vr0: port 0x6400-0x64ff mem 0xe1000000-0xe10000ff irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 > > > /kernel: vr0: Ethernet address 00:05:5d:93:5b:61 > > > /kernel: miibus0: on vr0 > > > > It should have said someting about ukphy0: bla-bla on miibus0 also, > > right? > > ukphy0: generic IEEE 802.3a media interface on miibus0 > ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX,100baseTX,100baseTX-FDX,auto > > > What does an 'ifconfig vr0' say? > > vr0: flags8843 MTU 1500 > inet 213.132.119.242 netmask Oxffffff00 broadcast 213.132.119.255 > inet6 fe80::205:5dff:fe93:5b61%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > ether 00:05:5d:93:5b:61 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > That seems OK, but: Where did you get that IP-address from? Why do you start dhclient if you already have an address? What do you have in your /etc/rc.conf (network_interfaces, ifconfig_* and defaultrouter is the most interesting variables)? /thn -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Svensk Aktuell Elektronik AB Thomas Nyström Box 10 Phone: +46 8 35 92 85 S-191 21 Sollentuna Fax: +46 8 35 92 86 Sweden Email: thn@saeab.se --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 08:33:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F4216A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:33:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from tnpsmtp.telenor.se (franklin.telenor.se [213.150.135.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C681043FD7 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:33:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from parlei@algonet.se) Received: from kairos.algonet.se (kairos.algonet.se [213.150.135.237]) by franklin.telenor.se (BMR ErlangTM/OTP 3.1) with ESMTP id 59593.259580.1069.1s7900339franklin ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:33:00 +0100 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:32:56 +0100 (MET) From: Par Leijonhufvud To: Thomas Nystrom In-Reply-To: <3FBB810B.8BEEC8B3@saeab.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Par Leijonhufvud cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with Rhine III card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:33:18 -0000 On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Thomas Nystrom wrote: > That seems OK, but: Where did you get that IP-address from? Why do you > start dhclient if you already have an address? Old /var/db/dhclient.leases file, presumably (at least that matches the values there, and is in the regular netblock I get from my broadband ISP). > What do you have in your /etc/rc.conf (network_interfaces, ifconfig_* > and defaultrouter is the most interesting variables)? Nothing for network_interfaces #ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" ifconfig_vr0="inet 213.132.119.242 netmask 255.255.255.0" defaultrouter=213.132.119.1 The "xl0" line is from the old 3com card, and the "copy" of it is from my attempts to make it work. The line with the "inet..." is repeated a few times from attempts to use sysinstall to enable the card. /Par -- Par Leijonhufvud par@hunter-gatherer.org I think, however, that you will find that, online or in realspace, entering an ongoing conversation and insulting the people conducting it is not a good way of obtaining information. --David Friedman From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 08:34:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D054E16A4CE; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:34:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749E843F85; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:34:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id D72CC5309; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:34:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id B71B15308; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:34:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 496AE33C65; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:34:14 +0100 (CET) To: Pavel Gubin References: <20031118151342.GG1710@ie.tusur.ru> <20031119124815.GD37034@ie.tusur.ru> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:34:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20031119124815.GD37034@ie.tusur.ru> (Pavel Gubin's message of "Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:48:15 +0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: ss X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DOWNgrading 4.9-REL -> 4.8-REL... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:34:25 -0000 Pavel Gubin writes: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:19:05AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > make buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster > > > > > > is The Right Way? > > yes, with a reboot to single-user mode before installworld. > Hmm.. :) I was too lazy to reboot one more time, i just kill suspicious > processes like cron, sendmail etc. :) That's not enough, you want to be running the new kernel. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 08:51:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4115E16A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:51:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from lon-mail-2.gradwell.net (lon-mail-2.gradwell.net [193.111.201.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A131A43FAF for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:51:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@auliya.org) Received: (qmail 62332 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2003 16:51:41 -0000 Received: from 82-35-99-51.cable.ubr05.dals.blueyonder.co.uk (HELO auliya.org) (andrew%pop3.auliya.org@82.35.99.51) by lon-mail-2.gradwell.net with SMTP; 19 Nov 2003 16:51:41 -0000 Message-ID: <3FBB9FA1.2030803@auliya.org> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:51:45 +0000 From: Andrew User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031001 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Par Leijonhufvud References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Par Leijonhufvud cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with Rhine III card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:51:44 -0000 Hi folks, >ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" >ifconfig_vr0="inet 213.132.119.242 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > Bing bing bing bing! Problem! You're giving the interface two different sets of instructions, dhcp and a static IP. If it's meant to be dhcp, comment out the line giving it an IP (...inet 213..etc.) and run dhclient vn0. That shoudl give you an address you're meant to have. HTH, Andrew >defaultrouter=213.132.119.1 > >The "xl0" line is from the old 3com card, and the "copy" of it is from my >attempts to make it work. The line with the "inet..." is repeated a few >times from attempts to use sysinstall to enable the card. > >/Par > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 09:12:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CA916A4CF; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:12:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from cedar.ie.tusur.ru (fet-gw-ppp.ttk.tusur.ru [212.192.163.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3005843FAF; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:12:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pg@rainbow.ie.tusur.ru) Received: from rainbow.ie.tusur.ru (rainbow.ie.tusur.ru [212.192.122.75]) by cedar.ie.tusur.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAJH6LvK012543; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:06:22 +0600 (TSK) (envelope-from pg@rainbow.ie.tusur.ru) Received: from rainbow.ie.tusur.ru (localhost.ie.tusur.ru [127.0.0.1]) by rainbow.ie.tusur.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAJH6LQ5050758; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:06:21 +0600 (TSK) (envelope-from pg@rainbow.ie.tusur.ru) Received: (from pg@localhost) by rainbow.ie.tusur.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.8/Submit) id hAJH6LnJ050757; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:06:21 +0600 (TSK) (envelope-from pg) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:06:21 +0600 From: Pavel Gubin To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20031119170621.GA50690@ie.tusur.ru> References: <20031118151342.GG1710@ie.tusur.ru> <20031119124815.GD37034@ie.tusur.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: TUCSR, Industrial Electronics dept cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DOWNgrading 4.9-REL -> 4.8-REL... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:12:55 -0000 On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:34:14PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > yes, with a reboot to single-user mode before installworld. > > Hmm.. :) I was too lazy to reboot one more time, i just kill suspicious > > processes like cron, sendmail etc. :) > > That's not enough, you want to be running the new kernel. Anyway, this was the one of unsuccessful variations... And, again, anyway, panic() was appeared only in 4.9-REL of ata(4). -- Pavel Gubin TUSC&R / Industrial Electronics dept / System Administrator 2:5005/14@fidonet / Phone +7-3822-423067 / ICQ 28835566 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 12:31:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E60916A4CE; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:31:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.hispeed.ch (mxout.hispeed.ch [62.2.95.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7F243F75; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:30:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from llx@hispeed.ch) Received: from asterix.corebounce.org (dclient217-162-237-56.hispeed.ch [217.162.237.56])hAJKUvK4004642 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:30:58 +0100 From: llx To: Robert Watson Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:30:57 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311192130.57682.llx@hispeed.ch> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade fails: no locking avaiable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:31:05 -0000 yes i do. sh-2.05b$ rpcinfo -p program vers proto port service 100000 4 tcp 111 rpcbind 100000 3 tcp 111 rpcbind 100000 2 tcp 111 rpcbind 100000 4 udp 111 rpcbind 100000 3 udp 111 rpcbind 100000 2 udp 111 rpcbind 100000 4 local 111 rpcbind 100000 3 local 111 rpcbind 100000 2 local 111 rpcbind 100007 2 udp 1011 ypbind 100007 2 tcp 1023 ypbind 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs 100003 3 udp 2049 nfs 100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs 100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs 100024 1 udp 1009 status 100024 1 tcp 1021 status 100021 0 udp 1008 nlockmgr 100021 1 udp 1008 nlockmgr 100021 3 udp 1008 nlockmgr 100021 4 udp 1008 nlockmgr 100021 0 tcp 1020 nlockmgr 100021 1 tcp 1020 nlockmgr 100021 3 tcp 1020 nlockmgr 100021 4 tcp 1020 nlockmgr On Tuesday 18 November 2003 02:47, Robert Watson wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, llx wrote: > > i've a nfs server (FreeBSD 4.9) which exports the ports tree via NFS. > > > > on the client machine (FreeBSD 5.1) portupgrade fails: > > > checking configure sumary... ERROR: No locking available. Running > > > Samba > > > > would be unsafe > > > > > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config > > > > why does this happen? i thought that FreeBSD 5.x supports nfslocking as a > > client. on the server is started rpc.lockd and rpc.statd (see output > > rpcinfo below). > > Are you running rpc.statd and rpc.lockd on the client as well? > > Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects > robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories > > > cheers > > llx > > > > ipcinfo -p > > > > sh-2.05b$ rpcinfo -p frigi > > program vers proto port > > 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper > > 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper > > 100004 1 udp 1021 ypserv > > 100004 2 udp 1021 ypserv > > 100004 1 tcp 1023 ypserv > > 100004 2 tcp 1023 ypserv > > 100009 1 udp 1011 yppasswdd > > 100009 1 tcp 1022 yppasswdd > > 100005 3 udp 1008 mountd > > 100005 3 tcp 1021 mountd > > 100005 1 udp 1008 mountd > > 100005 1 tcp 1021 mountd > > 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs > > 100003 3 udp 2049 nfs > > 100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs > > 100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs > > 100021 1 udp 994 nlockmgr > > 100021 3 udp 994 nlockmgr > > 100021 4 udp 994 nlockmgr > > 100021 1 tcp 1020 nlockmgr > > 100021 3 tcp 1020 nlockmgr > > 100021 4 tcp 1020 nlockmgr > > 100024 1 udp 986 status > > 100024 1 tcp 1019 status > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 12:50:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EAC16A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:50:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx6.mail.ru (mx6.mail.ru [194.67.23.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D9843FE9 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:50:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from my-subs@mail.ru) Received: from [62.0.82.44] (port=1574 helo=old.home) by mx6.mail.ru with smtp id 1AMZHk-0000et-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:50:49 +0300 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:34:01 +0200 From: Alexander Portnoy To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20031119223401.16cf73f6.my-subs@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031119105914.GA20096@thai-aec.org> References: <20031119105914.GA20096@thai-aec.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed (FreeBSD) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected Subject: Re: Dell Inspiron 1100 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:50:53 -0000 On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:59:14 +0700 pirat wrote: > hi sirs, > > i have one notebook from dell, inspiron 1100. i would like to know if this notebook can be used with freebsd or not. it has on board broadcom nic. but the current os - linux TLE - does not `see' it also. > > thanks in advance for any helps and hints. > > -- > with best regards, > psr There is the driver for the NIC in the CURRENT. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 15:49:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8A416A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:49:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from imhotep.yuckfou.org (cust.89.117.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.89.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA3A43F93 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:49:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nivo@yuckfou.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imhotep.yuckfou.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BE7215 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:49:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from imhotep.yuckfou.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imhotep.yuckfou.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81994-01 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:49:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by imhotep.yuckfou.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 804CF209; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:49:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from yuckfou.org (turbata-xp [192.168.2.236]) by localhost.yuckfou.org (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:49:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3FBC0163.9010207@yuckfou.org> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:48:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030912 Thunderbird/0.3a X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20031117080649.GA529@> In-Reply-To: <20031117080649.GA529@> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nils Vogels X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.88 (Decidedly) X-TMDA-Fingerprint: gOoedC3k1SnUVlNSTa7INCbIiHQ X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at yuckfou.org Subject: Re: account-hook X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:49:01 -0000 Zoran Kolic wrote: > Dear List! > I've tried to add another >pop3 account to my muttrc and >found problem using account >hook for that. Ie: > >account-hook pop://my_pop_server/ 'set pop_user="xy" pop_pass="zw"' > > > You might want to consider using a small add-on utility called "muttprofile" that can be found at http://www.acoustics.hut.fi/~mara/mutt/muttprofile.html I've been using it for a number of years now without any kind of problems ;-) HTH & HAND Nils. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 16:37:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5490116A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:37:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3FD43FA3 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:37:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA18628 for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:36:57 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:36:57 -0700 (MST) From: Brett Glass Message-Id: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:37:01 -0000 I've got a machine here that needs an OS reinstall. It's using a 3Ware (twe) RAID card. Does the driver for this card work properly under 4.9-RELEASE? --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 16:45:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378E016A4E5 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:45:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052DB43FBD for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:45:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andymorritt@rogers.com) Received: from rogers.com ([24.114.181.203]) by fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.comESMTP <20031120004551.DGJK406311.fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@rogers.com> for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:45:51 -0500 Message-ID: <3FBC1090.3000500@rogers.com> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:53:36 -0500 From: Andrew Morritt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030927 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.114.181.203] using ID at Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:45:51 -0500 Subject: GLX Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:45:53 -0000 I have been trying to use several OpenGl games, but it always gives me a GLX error. /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so does not exist. I call GLX from my XFConfig file. In /var/logs/XFree86.0.log, it says Module not found. I have Mesa3 installed, I have rebuild it several times (with portupgrade) and I have tried rebuilding X. I am using FreeBSD 4.9. I was working on this with a guy in the #FreeBSDHelp channel, and he eventually told me to take this to the stable mailing list. I have tried copying libglx.a to libglx.so. cd / && ls -alR | grep glx turns up no library files. Anyone know what the problem might be? Thanks AndrewM From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 16:48:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF2616A4D0 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:48:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mag.barnet.com.au (mag.barnet.com.au [218.185.88.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F375443FAF for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:48:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from extmail.barnet.com.au (tim.direct.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.10.2]) by mag.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB42F2841; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:48:11 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <3FBC0F4B0001488601E4EE89@VIRUSCAN-127.0.0.1> Received: from extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by extmail.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A651F1F; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:48:11 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011111F18; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:48:10 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3CB666A7101; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:48:08 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:48:08 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Brett Glass Message-ID: <20031120004807.GE59401@k7.mavetju> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:48:19 -0000 On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:36:57PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > I've got a machine here that needs an OS reinstall. It's using a 3Ware > (twe) RAID card. Does the driver for this card work properly under > 4.9-RELEASE? I think you have the best equipment to test it with :-) If there are problems please let me know, I don't have the card yet but I will have to use it in the near future. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/weblog.php From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 16:59:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923E316A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:59:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8710A43FAF for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:59:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA18837; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:59:25 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:59:21 -0700 To: Edwin Groothuis From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <20031120004807.GE59401@k7.mavetju> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <20031120004807.GE59401@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:59:34 -0000 At 05:48 PM 11/19/2003, Edwin Groothuis wrote: >I think you have the best equipment to test it with :-) So, I'd have to be the guinea pig, eh? I'm not sure I can afford to do that. I can run the machine through a few kernel recompiles, but can't leave it down long enough to do a real stress test. I may just have to go with 4.8-RELEASE. I must say that I am in kind of a quandary nowadays. I'd like to install 4.9-RELEASE when I make up a new system, but I am very leery of using it on important machines. It seems as if the addition of PAE (Why wasn't this reserved for 5.x?) caused a lot of problems, and that the developers went back to fix them somewhat grudgingly (they had long since put the 4.x code aside, except for bug fixes, and were grinding away on 5.x). And 5.x still isn't "there" yet when it comes to solidity and polish. Are other people besides me sticking to 4.8-RELEASE plus patches? --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 17:37:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD91B16A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:37:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF78043FDF for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:37:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (blackwater.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FAF2BD0F for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:37:39 +1100 (EST) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 265F2511FC; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:07:37 +1030 (CST) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:07:37 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: pirat Message-ID: <20031120013737.GF22360@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20031119105914.GA20096@thai-aec.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031119105914.GA20096@thai-aec.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dell Inspiron 1100 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 01:37:42 -0000 --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] Single line paragraph. On Wednesday, 19 November 2003 at 17:59:14 +0700, pirat wrote: > hi sirs, > > i have one notebook from dell, inspiron 1100. i would like to know > if this notebook can be used with freebsd or not. it has on board > broadcom nic. but the current os - linux TLE - does not `see' it > also. This is pretty much the same as the Inspiron 5100 I have. The onboard NIC is supported in stable, but I had some problems starting X: the BIOS wasn't completely mapped, and I had to compile it in to the server. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-jul2003.html#25 for more details. Greg -- When replying to this message, please take care not to mutilate the original text. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/email.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/vBrhIubykFB6QiMRAjObAJ94majUE2NdCsbdqU5/cPzegzdCYwCeP8cc 5cklhJVx+nhdlDyJwcxeG7s= =Jo+m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 17:41:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FE016A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:41:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE8543FAF for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:41:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id EE50C144F6; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:41:30 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:41:30 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 01:41:32 -0000 On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Brett Glass wrote: > So, I'd have to be the guinea pig, eh? > > I'm not sure I can afford to do that. Well, I mean ... this seems to be a common thread in some of your past postings to the list. In your shoes, honestly, what I would do is hire someone from our consultants list and pay them for a support contract. IMHO that's the only way you're going to be able to rely on getting authoritative responses in a fixed time-period, i.e. quickly enough for you to be able to make your necessary business decisions. Asking for volunteer labor to do QA and regression testing on a fixed schedule, when you're not in the position to do those tasks themselves, is merely going to frustrate everyone, including yourself, in the long run. I mean, I'd really like to see it proven possible to make supporting FreeBSD a valid business model, just like it is for many other operating systems, for my own personal reasons if nothing else :-) mcl From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 18:05:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F6116A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:05:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AD043F75 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:05:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.166] helo=localhost) by tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AMeCd-0000yn-PW for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:05:51 +0000 Received: from rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.165]) by localhost (scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 03308-09 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:05:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.161.253]) by rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AMeCd-0000yk-C9 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:05:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 26752 invoked by uid 0); 20 Nov 2003 02:05:51 -0000 Received: from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk by gateway by uid 71 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (sweep: 2.14/3.71. spamassassin: 2.53. Clear:. Processed in 3.02718 secs); 20 Nov 2003 02:05:51 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk via gateway X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 3.02718 secs) Received: from dhcp1131.wadham.ox.ac.uk (HELO piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk) (163.1.161.131) by gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk with SMTP; 20 Nov 2003 02:05:48 -0000 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.1.20031120015701.02cb74f8@popserver.sfu.ca> X-Sender: cperciva@popserver.sfu.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:05:46 +0000 To: Brett Glass From: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> References: <20031120004807.GE59401@k7.mavetju> <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <20031120004807.GE59401@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:05:54 -0000 At 17:59 19/11/2003 -0700, Brett Glass wrote: >Are other people besides me sticking to 4.8-RELEASE plus patches? Depending upon whether you believe freebsd.org's www logs or my FreeBSD Update www logs, somewhere in the range of 30-60% of former FreeBSD 4.8 users have switched to 4.9-RELEASE. I'm inclined to say that neither source is likely to be worth believing, but I think we can conclude that the number is somewhere between 0% and 100%. :) Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 18:08:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE7516A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:08:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923E343FE3 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:08:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA19582; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:08:38 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119190516.049a66d0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:08:36 -0700 To: Mark Linimon From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: References: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:08:48 -0000 At 06:41 PM 11/19/2003, Mark Linimon wrote: >> I'm not sure I can afford to do that. > >Well, I mean ... this seems to be a common thread in some of >your past postings to the list. > >In your shoes, honestly, what I would do is hire someone from >our consultants list and pay them for a support contract. That wouldn't help; they wouldn't be able to do a test any faster than I could. What DOES help is having the list handy so that we can ask one another about our experiences. >IMHO that's the only way you're going to be able to rely on >getting authoritative responses in a fixed time-period, i.e. >quickly enough for you to be able to make your necessary business >decisions. Asking for volunteer labor to do QA and regression >testing on a fixed schedule, when you're not in the position >to do those tasks themselves, is merely going to frustrate everyone, >including yourself, in the long run. That's not what I'm asking for, of course. I'm asking to hear if anyone has already had experience with the hardware and software in question. It's mutually beneficial to everyone in the community if this information is shared widely. --Brett From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 18:12:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9924B16A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:12:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mag.barnet.com.au (mag.barnet.com.au [218.185.88.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC0D43FDD for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:12:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from extmail.barnet.com.au (tim.direct.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.10.2]) by mag.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C59623EE; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:12:42 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <3FBC23190000D5C701D08DDC@VIRUSCAN-127.0.0.1> Received: from extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by extmail.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CCF1F1A; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:12:41 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422A11E18; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:12:41 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8D3426A7101; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:12:40 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:12:40 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Brett Glass Message-ID: <20031120021240.GV90377@k7.mavetju> References: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119190516.049a66d0@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119190516.049a66d0@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Mark Linimon cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:12:46 -0000 On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:08:36PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > At 06:41 PM 11/19/2003, Mark Linimon wrote: > That's not what I'm asking for, of course. I'm asking to hear > if anyone has already had experience with the hardware and software > in question. It's mutually beneficial to everyone in the community > if this information is shared widely. I hope you will do it with me when you have found out how the card behaves :-) Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/weblog.php From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 18:21:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A7016A4CF for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:21:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EEB43FBD for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:21:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA19705; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:21:01 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119191956.049979c8@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:20:58 -0700 To: Edwin Groothuis From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <20031120021240.GV90377@k7.mavetju> References: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119190516.049a66d0@localhost> <20031120021240.GV90377@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: Mark Linimon cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:21:10 -0000 At 07:12 PM 11/19/2003, Edwin Groothuis wrote: >I hope you will do it with me when you have found out how the card >behaves :-) Hey, who put me in this tank? (Woink... Woink... Woink....) ;-) --Brett From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 18:49:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA1B16A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:49:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09F943FE1 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:48:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (cs242746-11.austin.rr.com [24.27.46.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9154144F6; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:48:57 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <3FBC2B49.8090409@lonesome.com> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:47:37 +0000 From: Mark Linimon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030713 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brett Glass References: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119190516.049a66d0@localhost> <20031120021240.GV90377@k7.mavetju> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119191956.049979c8@localhost> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119191956.049979c8@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:49:02 -0000 > > >Hey, who put me in this tank? > The only way for the paradigm of "sharing the support burden" will work if everyone treats it as a two-way street. I'm not trying to be rude, but you'll have to remind me, other than your frequent advocacy position statements, how much you've been helping out other folks recently, compared to how often you've been asking for assistance yourself? mcl From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 19:36:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA14016A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:36:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B993943FAF for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:36:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA20446; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:36:09 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119202936.049a5770@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:30:18 -0700 To: Mark Linimon From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <3FBC2B49.8090409@lonesome.com> References: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119190516.049a66d0@localhost> <20031120021240.GV90377@k7.mavetju> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119191956.049979c8@localhost> <3FBC2B49.8090409@lonesome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 03:36:19 -0000 At 07:47 PM 11/19/2003, Mark Linimon wrote: >I'm not trying to be rude, but you'll have to remind me, other than >your frequent advocacy position statements, how much you've been >helping out other folks recently, compared to how often you've been >asking for assistance yourself? I'm spending a whole evening (maybe more) redoing this server to help someone out. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 19:50:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADA016A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:50:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from doom.homeunix.org (8-147.dialup.comset.net [213.172.8.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0637C43FCB for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:49:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: from doom.homeunix.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doom.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAK3k0p5000454; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:47:18 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: (from igor@localhost) by doom.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hAK3j9ud000453; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:45:09 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igor) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:45:09 +0300 From: Igor Pokrovsky To: Andrew Morritt Message-ID: <20031120034508.GA389@doom.homeunix.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morritt , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <3FBC1090.3000500@rogers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FBC1090.3000500@rogers.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Accept-Language: ru cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GLX Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 03:50:36 -0000 On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:53:36PM -0500, Andrew Morritt wrote: > I have been trying to use several OpenGl games, but it always gives me a > GLX error. /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so does not exist. I > call GLX from my XFConfig file. In /var/logs/XFree86.0.log, it says > Module not found. I have Mesa3 installed, I have rebuild it several > times (with portupgrade) and I have tried rebuilding X. I am using > FreeBSD 4.9. I was working on this with a guy in the #FreeBSDHelp > channel, and he eventually told me to take this to the stable mailing > list. I have tried copying libglx.a to libglx.so. cd / && ls -alR | grep > glx turns up no library files. Anyone know what the problem might be? I suppose you are running XFree86 4.x? In this case GLX code is in main XFree distribution and separate Mesa port is used only to get GLUT installed. So you probably can try to reinstall XFree from ports. -ip -- God made the world in six days, and was arrested on the seventh. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 20:14:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D6016A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:14:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (sbk-gw.sibnet.ru [217.70.96.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B3F43F85 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:14:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) Received: from sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAK4EfoV042253; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:14:42 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) Received: from localhost (stranger@localhost)hAK4Edqp042247; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:14:40 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) X-Authentication-Warning: sbk-gw.sibnet.ru: stranger owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:14:39 +0600 (NOVT) From: "Maxim M. Kazachek" X-X-Sender: stranger@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru To: Par Leijonhufvud In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20031120101318.J42137@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on sbk-gw.sibnet.ru cc: Par Leijonhufvud cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with Rhine III card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:14:54 -0000 >On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Thomas Nystrom wrote: > >#ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" >ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" >ifconfig_vr0="inet 213.132.119.242 netmask 255.255.255.0" > >defaultrouter=213.132.119.1 > You have static IP address on vr0... For what you need a line with ifconfig_vr0="DHCP"? Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek mailto:stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru mailto:stranger@fpm.ami.nstu.ru From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 20:45:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F8416A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:45:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B7143F75 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:45:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAK4j0m5038916; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:45:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAK4j0Ur024742; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:45:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:49:08 -0500 To: Brett Glass , stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:45:03 -0000 Yes, it does for me on several machines. ---Mike At 07:36 PM 19/11/2003, Brett Glass wrote: >I've got a machine here that needs an OS reinstall. It's using a 3Ware >(twe) RAID card. Does the driver for this card work properly under >4.9-RELEASE? > >--Brett Glass >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 21:02:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB4816A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:02:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.itga.com.au (ns1.itga.com.au [202.53.40.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9637B43FE1 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:02:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns1.itga.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAK52GR5083215; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:02:16 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA09391; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:02:15 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200311200502.QAA09391@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 05/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Gregory Bond To: "Maxim M. Kazachek" In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:14:39 +0600. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:02:15 +1100 Sender: gnb@itga.com.au cc: Par Leijonhufvud cc: Par Leijonhufvud cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with Rhine III card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:02:25 -0000 > >#ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" > >ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" > >ifconfig_vr0="inet 213.132.119.242 netmask 255.255.255.0" > You have static IP address on vr0... For what you need a line with > ifconfig_vr0="DHCP"? It's a shell script. Only the last "ifconfig_vr0=" line will have any effect. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 21:23:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B04B16A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:23:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F9F43F75 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:23:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA00580; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:23:42 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119222207.036287d8@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:23:37 -0700 To: Mike Tancsa , stable@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:23:46 -0000 Thank you! This is encouraging. Will the changes to the alignment of data structures made on 6 November affect the functionality of the driver or a file system that uses it? I did see a message go by that suggested that vinum is affected, but is UFS? --Brett At 09:49 PM 11/19/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote: >Yes, it does for me on several machines. > > ---Mike > >At 07:36 PM 19/11/2003, Brett Glass wrote: >>I've got a machine here that needs an OS reinstall. It's using a 3Ware >>(twe) RAID card. Does the driver for this card work properly under >>4.9-RELEASE? >> >>--Brett Glass >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 22:13:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A2916A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:13:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C88F443F85 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:13:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: (qmail 57388 invoked by uid 1001); 20 Nov 2003 06:13:44 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:13:44 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Brett Glass Message-ID: <20031120061343.GA54103@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Brett Glass , Mike Tancsa , stable@freebsd.org References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119222207.036287d8@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119222207.036287d8@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:13:50 -0000 On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:23:37PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > Thank you! This is encouraging. Will the changes to the > alignment of data structures made on 6 November affect > the functionality of the driver or a file system that > uses it? I did see a message go by that suggested that > vinum is affected, but is UFS? What changes?? As far as I can tell there were no changes of the sort you allude to committed to RELENG_4 (or RELENG_4_9 or RELENG_4_8 for that matter) on or around Nov 6. > > --Brett > > At 09:49 PM 11/19/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > >Yes, it does for me on several machines. > > > > ---Mike > > > >At 07:36 PM 19/11/2003, Brett Glass wrote: > >>I've got a machine here that needs an OS reinstall. It's using a 3Ware > >>(twe) RAID card. Does the driver for this card work properly under > >>4.9-RELEASE? > >> > >>--Brett Glass -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 22:51:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B78E16A4CE; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:51:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from access.inet.co.th (access.inet.co.th [203.151.127.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7989243FBD; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:51:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from firak.thai-aec.org (TruPPPv92-230-92.inet.co.th [203.151.230.92]) by access.inet.co.th (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id hAK6pnbC091943; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:51:50 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from firak.thai-aec.org (localhost.thai-aec.org [127.0.0.1]) by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAK6pQl3000960; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:51:26 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: (from pirat@localhost) by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hAK6pP6s000959; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:51:25 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) X-Authentication-Warning: firak.thai-aec.org: pirat set sender to pirat@access.inet.co.th using -f Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:51:25 +0700 From: pirat To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" Message-ID: <20031120065125.GA938@thai-aec.org> References: <20031119105914.GA20096@thai-aec.org> <20031120013737.GF22360@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=tis-620 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031120013737.GF22360@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD firak.thai-aec.org 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE www-home-page: http://www.thai-aec.org www-FreeBSD-page: http://www.thai.net/makham cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Dell Inspiron 1100 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:51:59 -0000 On Thursday, 20 November 2003 at 12:07:37 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:07:37 +1030 > From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" > To: pirat > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: Dell Inspiron 1100 and FreeBSD > > [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] > > Single line paragraph. > > On Wednesday, 19 November 2003 at 17:59:14 +0700, pirat wrote: > > hi sirs, > > > > i have one notebook from dell, inspiron 1100. i would like to know > > if this notebook can be used with freebsd or not. it has on board > > broadcom nic. but the current os - linux TLE - does not `see' it > > also. > > This is pretty much the same as the Inspiron 5100 I have. The onboard > NIC is supported in stable, but I had some problems starting X: the > BIOS wasn't completely mapped, and I had to compile it in to the > server. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-jul2003.html#25 for more > details. > > Greg hi sirs, thanks to both Alexander Portnoy and 'groggy' for your helps, am reading your diary now Greg. also for comments on messages layout. -- with best regards, psr http://www.thai-aec.org http://www.thai.net/makham From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 22:53:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B72F16A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:53:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from glide.turing.com (glide.turing.com [66.92.135.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D3FD43FD7 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:53:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from awd@glide.turing.com) Received: (qmail 39547 invoked by uid 1001); 20 Nov 2003 06:53:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:53:34 -0600 From: "Adam W. Dace" To: Brett Glass , stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031120065333.GA39329@glide.turing.com> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: adam@turing.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:53:35 -0000 Me too. I can't say I'm using them for anything "production" (although sometimes I consider xemacs access to be so!) but my devel workstation has been running 4.9R for some time now, and all seems fine in the land of RAID1. twed0: on twe0 twed0: 114439MB (234372952 sectors) FYI, the performance is downright amazing...although I sure wish I could use atacontrol with it. ;) --Adam On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:49:08PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > Yes, it does for me on several machines. > > ---Mike > > At 07:36 PM 19/11/2003, Brett Glass wrote: > >I've got a machine here that needs an OS reinstall. It's using a 3Ware > >(twe) RAID card. Does the driver for this card work properly under > >4.9-RELEASE? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 23:19:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D66A16A4CE; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:19:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.129.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5C143F75; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:19:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (pc2-105.intern.meitner [10.3.12.105]) by meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21618167587; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:19:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from kiste.my.domain (kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAK7JaUC054320 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:19:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) From: Michael Nottebrock Organization: FreeBSD To: John Reynolds , ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:19:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <16315.2459.457793.876084@whale.home-net> In-Reply-To: <16315.2459.457793.876084@whale.home-net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_IsGv/td3oWi+zS9"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200311200819.36189.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: call for testers -- changes to libusb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:19:45 -0000 --Boundary-02=_IsGv/td3oWi+zS9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 19 November 2003 07:11, John Reynolds wrote: > I know that sane (or sane-backend) links to this > library, but I don't have a USB scanner so I have no way of knowing if > things are cool or not. Worksforme with an Epson 1260 USB scanner driven by sane-backends. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_IsGv/td3oWi+zS9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/vGsIXhc68WspdLARAmOJAKCT2dTrtXDS4dc3Ama6sa3lIuNj9gCeOQMd 4LBbJpxgYieoVvEvHOsmvAo= =fpLb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_IsGv/td3oWi+zS9-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 06:22:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AC416A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:22:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from alogis.com (firewall.solit-ag.de [212.184.102.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BF343FDF for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:22:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Holger.Kipp@alogis.com) Received: (from hk@localhost) by alogis.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) id hAKELae80904; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:21:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hk) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:21:36 +0100 From: Holger Kipp To: Brett Glass Message-ID: <20031120152136.A72766@intserv.int1.b.intern> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <20031120004807.GE59401@k7.mavetju> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost>; from brett@lariat.org on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:59:21PM -0700 cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:22:41 -0000 On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:59:21PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > At 05:48 PM 11/19/2003, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > >I think you have the best equipment to test it with :-) > > So, I'd have to be the guinea pig, eh? twe0@pci1:5:0: class=0x010400 card=0x100113c1 chip=0x100113c1 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = '3ware Inc.' device = '7000 series ATA-100 Storage Controller' class = mass storage subclass = RAID twe1@pci1:6:0: class=0x010400 card=0x100113c1 chip=0x100113c1 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = '3ware Inc.' device = '7000 series ATA-100 Storage Controller' class = mass storage subclass = RAID works without problems here. well, we don't use the raid-5 any more due to some 'interesting' behaviour we encountered here once, though. FreeBSD verleihnix.int1.b.intern 4.9-RC FreeBSD 4.9-RC #19: Fri Oct 24 14:23:51 CEST 2003 root@verleihnix.int1.b.intern:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/B-VERLEIHNIX i386 Hmm - maybe I should update the system to 4.9-STABLE :-) > I'm not sure I can afford to do that. I can run the > machine through a few kernel recompiles, but can't > leave it down long enough to do a real stress test. you could go back to a working kernel if 4.9-RELEASE or -STABLE does not work for you. > I must say that I am in kind of a quandary nowadays. I'd > like to install 4.9-RELEASE when I make up a new system, > but I am very leery of using it on important machines. > It seems as if the addition of PAE (Why wasn't this > reserved for 5.x?) caused a lot of problems, and that Then don't use it... On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Ceri Davies wrote: > I'm confused; how does one disable PAE? I don't see a kernel option for > it. 'options PAE' turns it on. Without it turns it off. :) (googled for "disable PAE FreeBSD") Regards, Holger Kipp From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 07:02:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1160016A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:02:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from ngfl.dialnet.com (ngmail.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E52443FEA for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:02:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) Received: from ngmfilt.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.121] by ngfl.dialnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A6D641240110; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:59:34 +0000 Received: from relay.ngfl.dialnet.com (unverified) by ngmfilt.ngfl.dialnet.com for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:59:29 +0000 Received: from firewall.cardinalnewman.lan ( [172.30.0.70]) by relay.ngfl.dialnet.com with SMTP (MailShield v2.04 - WIN32 Jul 17 2001 17:12:42); Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:00:48 -0000 Received: from mail.cardinalnewman.lan (mail.cardinalnewman.lan [192.168.0.3]) hAKF2Oxj000516 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:02:24 GMT (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) Received: from dumpster.cardinalnewman.lan (dumpster.cardinalnewman.lan [192.168.0.9])hAKF2Ncr008680 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:02:23 GMT (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) From: ict technician Organization: Cardinal Newman School To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:02:22 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200311181724.18225.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> In-Reply-To: <200311181724.18225.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311201502.22720.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.8 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_KMAIL version=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (mail.cardinalnewman.lan) X-SMTP-HELO: firewall.cardinalnewman.lan X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: [172.30.0.70] Subject: Re: panic ffs_blkfree bad size X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:02:32 -0000 On Tuesday 18 November 2003 5:24 pm, ict technician wrote: > This is on a 4.8-RELEASE system. I know this is ancient but the referenced > code doesn't seem to have changed much. > > This is our samba file server. We've been getting reboots every 20 days or > so. vinum RAID10 if that matters. dmesg/WHY on request. That'll teach me to mock the gods. Got another panic today. > > I am not a kernel hacker. > > dumpster# gdb -k^M > GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) > Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you > are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain > conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. > This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd". > (kgdb) stmymbol-file ke^Grnel.d^Gebug > Reading symbols from kernel.debug...Deprecated bfd_read called at > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dbxread.c > line 2627 in elfstab_build_psymtabs Deprecated bfd_read called at > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dbxread.c > line 933 in fill_symbuf done. > (kgdb) exec-file ke^Grnel.4 > (kgdb) core-file vm^Gcore.4 > IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x003c4000 > initial pcb at physical address 0x0031f6a0 > panicstr: ffs_blkfree: bad size > panic messages: > --- > panic: ffs_blkfree: bad size > > syncing disks... 154 21 > done > Uptime: 18d20h25m18s [snip vmcore.4 dump] dumpster# gdb -k GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd". (kgdb) symbol-file kernel.debug Reading symbols from kernel.debug...Deprecated bfd_read called at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dbxread.c line 2627 in elfstab_build_psymtabs Deprecated bfd_read called at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dbxread.c line 933 in fill_symbuf done. (kgdb) exec-file kernel.5 (kgdb) core-file vmcore.5 IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x003c4000 initial pcb at physical address 0x0031f6a0 panicstr: lockmgr: non-zero exclusive count panic messages: --- panic: lockmgr: non-zero exclusive count syncing disks... 107 11 done Uptime: 2d3h54m12s dumping to dev #da/0x20001, offset 1048704 dump 1535 [snip...] 1 0 --- #0 0xc017d98a in dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 487 if (dumping++) { (kgdb) bt #0 0xc017d98a in dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 #1 0xc3f0e694 in ?? () #2 0xc017d75b in boot (howto=256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:319 #3 0xc017db80 in poweroff_wait (junk=0xc02c7680, howto=65554) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:612 #4 0xc01780b9 in lockmgr (lkp=0xc66bf300, flags=16842770, interlkp=0xe697bb6c, p=0xe05c05e0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:381 #5 0xc01a8b10 in vop_stdunlock (ap=0xe3654ec0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_default.c:279 #6 0xc025b201 in ufsdirhash_build (ip=0xe3654ec0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_dirhash.c:107 #7 0xc01b2c8d in vn_lock (vp=0xe697bb00, flags=65554, p=0xe05c05e0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c:680 #8 0xc01aba5f in vget (vp=0xe697bb00, flags=18, p=0xe05c05e0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:1538 #9 0xc0252f73 in ffs_sync (mp=0xc3fe5600, waitfor=3, cred=0xc295c900, p=0xe05c05e0) at vnode_if.h:558 #10 0xc01acde5 in sync_inactive (ap=0xe3654f7c) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2977 #11 0xc01ab46f in sched_sync () at vnode_if.h:886 -- i j hart ICT Technician Cardinal Newman Catholic School & Community College From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 07:08:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC7416A4CF for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:08:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FB143FDD for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:08:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAKF8Im5041439; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:08:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAKF8JUr026391; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:08:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20031120101003.08877350@209.112.4.2> X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:13:08 -0500 To: Brett Glass , stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119222207.036287d8@localhost> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119222207.036287d8@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:08:25 -0000 At 12:23 AM 20/11/2003, Brett Glass wrote: >Thank you! This is encouraging. Will the changes to the >alignment of data structures made on 6 November affect >the functionality of the driver or a file system that >uses it? What commit are you talking about ? Please provide a URL from http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/archive/2003/cvs-all/ so we know what you are referring to. ---Mike >I did see a message go by that suggested that >vinum is affected, but is UFS? > >--Brett > >At 09:49 PM 11/19/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > >Yes, it does for me on several machines. > > > > ---Mike > > > >At 07:36 PM 19/11/2003, Brett Glass wrote: > >>I've got a machine here that needs an OS reinstall. It's using a 3Ware > >>(twe) RAID card. Does the driver for this card work properly under > >>4.9-RELEASE? > >> > >>--Brett Glass > >>_______________________________________________ > >>freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 07:13:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6171E16A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:13:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from lon-mail-1.gradwell.net (lon-mail-1.gradwell.net [193.111.201.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3163943FE0 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:13:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@auliya.org) Received: (qmail 28741 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2003 15:13:38 -0000 Received: from 82-35-99-51.cable.ubr05.dals.blueyonder.co.uk (HELO auliya.org) (andrew%pop3.auliya.org@82.35.99.51) by lon-mail-1.gradwell.net with SMTP; 20 Nov 2003 15:13:38 -0000 Message-ID: <3FBCDA2A.7080104@auliya.org> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:13:46 +0000 From: Andrew User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031001 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregory Bond References: <200311200502.QAA09391@lightning.itga.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200311200502.QAA09391@lightning.itga.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Par Leijonhufvud cc: Par Leijonhufvud cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: "Maxim M. Kazachek" Subject: Re: Problems with Rhine III card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:13:43 -0000 Gregory Bond wrote: >>>#ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" >>>ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" >>>ifconfig_vr0="inet 213.132.119.242 netmask 255.255.255.0" >>> >>> > > > >>You have static IP address on vr0... For what you need a line with >>ifconfig_vr0="DHCP"? >> >> > >It's a shell script. Only the last "ifconfig_vr0=" line will have any effect. > Ah, of course! I suppose then that the OP had a bad IP, perhaps one already taken (213.132.119.242)... Not to mention netmask... Cheers, Andrew From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 09:16:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A716F16A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:16:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.omnis.com (smtp.omnis.com [216.239.128.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942B343F93 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:16:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.homeunix.net (66-91-236-204.san.rr.com [66.91.236.204]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC8D7301C; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:15:15 -0800 (PST) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr To: Brett Glass , Mark Linimon Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:16:08 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119190516.049a66d0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119190516.049a66d0@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311200916.08563.wes@softweyr.com> cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:16:10 -0000 On Wednesday 19 November 2003 06:08 pm, Brett Glass wrote: > At 06:41 PM 11/19/2003, Mark Linimon wrote: > > >IMHO that's the only way you're going to be able to rely on > >getting authoritative responses in a fixed time-period, i.e. > >quickly enough for you to be able to make your necessary business > >decisions. Asking for volunteer labor to do QA and regression > >testing on a fixed schedule, when you're not in the position > >to do those tasks themselves, is merely going to frustrate everyone, > >including yourself, in the long run. > > That's not what I'm asking for, of course. I'm asking to hear > if anyone has already had experience with the hardware and software > in question. It's mutually beneficial to everyone in the community > if this information is shared widely. Yes, and the mail list archives and FAQs help there, but somebody at some point has to be the pioneer. Living in Wyoming, I'm certain you've seen lots of pictures of pioneers, right? They're easy to identify; they're the people with arrows sticking out of their backs. ;^) -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 09:32:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101A616A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:32:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D9943FD7 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:32:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA07612; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:32:13 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031120102709.036c8128@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:30:46 -0700 To: Wes Peters , Mark Linimon From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <200311200916.08563.wes@softweyr.com> References: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119190516.049a66d0@localhost> <200311200916.08563.wes@softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:32:20 -0000 At 10:16 AM 11/20/2003, Wes Peters wrote: >> That's not what I'm asking for, of course. I'm asking to hear >> if anyone has already had experience with the hardware and software >> in question. It's mutually beneficial to everyone in the community >> if this information is shared widely. > >Yes, and the mail list archives and FAQs help there, but somebody at some >point has to be the pioneer. I see nothing wrong with asking first, so that I know whether I need to BE the pioneer! After all, if folks do not do this, then we could have more people than necessary sporting those unsightly arrows in their backs. So, IMHO, it is not appropriate to criticize people for posting queries. --Brett From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 09:42:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A0816A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:42:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.blarg.net (zoot.blarg.net [206.124.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A0243FEA for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:42:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abowhill@blarg.net) Received: from kosmos.my.net (vp153.dmp02.sea.blarg.net [206.124.131.153]) by mail.blarg.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4BA33D19 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:42:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from kosmos.my.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kosmos.my.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAK5iF0F004201 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:44:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kosmos@kosmos.my.net) Received: (from kosmos@localhost) by kosmos.my.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hAK5iFsF004200 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:44:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kosmos) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:44:13 -0800 From: kosmos To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031120054413.GC3997@kosmos.my.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: "enable pap" in user ppp X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:42:41 -0000 Hello, I think something might have broken with the "enable pap" in (somewhat) recent changes to the user PPP sources. I had this option in my config before I updated and made world, and it worked fine. But after I updated and made world it broke PPP functionality. I don't have time to discuss diagnostics here, but if enable pap is in my config file, (ppp built within the past couple of days), it will not continue on to packet switching just after authentication is successful. LCP works fine (the first "P" pops up in the PPP command shell) but that's as far as it gets. It just sits there. Otherwise, there is no sign of an error. [...] Nov 19 21:21:48 kosmos ppp[4142]: tun0: LCP: deflink: State change Ack-Rcvd --> Opened Nov 19 21:21:48 kosmos ppp[4142]: tun0: LCP: deflink: LayerUp Nov 19 21:21:48 kosmos ppp[4142]: tun0: LCP: deflink: SendIdent(0) state = Opened Nov 19 21:21:48 kosmos ppp[4142]: tun0: LCP: MAGICNUM 24688f55 Nov 19 21:21:48 kosmos ppp[4142]: tun0: LCP: TEXT user-ppp 3.1 (built Nov 19 2003) Nov 19 21:21:48 kosmos ppp[4142]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Authenticate Nov 19 21:21:48 kosmos ppp[4142]: tun0: Phase: deflink: his = PAP, mine = PAP Nov 19 21:21:48 kosmos ppp[4142]: tun0: Phase: Pap Output: abowhill ******** Nov 19 21:21:48 kosmos ppp[4142]: tun0: Phase: Pap Input: SUCCESS () (here it sits until the host times out) [...] If I remove the option: "enable pap" from the config file, everything works fine, and it continues on to make a successful connection. The reason I am posting this is because functionality broke right after I made world, and I spent a lot of quality "head-scratching" time with this. No changes made at the isp (who states radius is authenticating me) and no changes were made to my configs. I made no changes to the kernel config, either. FreeBSD kosmos.my.net 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #0: Wed Nov 19 02:12:17 PST 2003 root@kosmos:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 -- Allan Bowhill abowhill@blarg.net The Roman Rule The one who says it cannot be done should never interrupt the one who is doing it. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 09:47:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51E016A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:47:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123A243FBD for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:47:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EF72A72DBD; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:47:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3DE72DB8 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:47:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:47:44 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20031118001514.GC15325@pir.net> Message-ID: <20031120094552.M48733@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20031118001514.GC15325@pir.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Hang on boot with 4.9-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:47:45 -0000 On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Peter Radcliffe wrote: > Yet another hang on boot issue wqith 4.9. I havn't seen anything the > same go through the list and I've searched the archives but not found > anything appropriate. > > Dual processor P4 box, serverworks chipset, that has been rock solid > under 4.8-P3, took it to 4.9-R and 4.9-STABLE (as of today) and it > hangs on boot after the apm0 line. It's doing SMP and the motherboard > has hyperthreading enabled. Well this is crazy. APM doesn't play well under SMP and for some reason you're not using ACPI. Can you try compiling acpi into your kernel and retrying? > FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #6: Mon Nov 17 18:02:33 EST 2003 > pir@falcon:/usr/src/sys/compile/SWORKS > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz > CPU: Intel(R) XEON(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2395.92-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf24 Stepping = 4 > Features=0x3febfbff > Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs Xeons are Xeons and not P4s. Big difference :) What motherboard? -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 10:36:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BDD16A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:36:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E0643F85 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:36:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08787; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:36:37 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031120113043.036bd3f8@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:36:34 -0700 To: Mike Tancsa , stable@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20031120101003.08877350@209.112.4.2> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119222207.036287d8@localhost> <6.0.1.1.0.20031120101003.08877350@209.112.4.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:36:41 -0000 Easiest way to see the commit is by going to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/twe/twereg.h on the CVS Web interface. It seems to say that the changes were committed on November 6th. The colored diff shows that quite a few data structures had their packing changed. --Brett At 08:13 AM 11/20/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote: >What commit are you talking about ? Please provide a URL from http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/archive/2003/cvs-all/ >so we know what you are referring to. > > ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 10:41:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2327D16A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:41:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD3343FA3 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:41:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAKIfSm5003870; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:41:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAKIfUUr027549; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:41:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20031120134324.092acbd0@209.112.4.2> X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:46:15 -0500 To: Brett Glass , stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031120113043.036bd3f8@localhost> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119222207.036287d8@localhost> <6.0.1.1.0.20031120101003.08877350@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031120113043.036bd3f8@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:41:33 -0000 I only see the commit to HEAD and not STABLE. ---Mike At 01:36 PM 20/11/2003, Brett Glass wrote: >Easiest way to see the commit is by going to > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/twe/twereg.h > >on the CVS Web interface. It seems to say that the changes were >committed on November 6th. The colored diff shows that quite a >few data structures had their packing changed. > >--Brett > >At 08:13 AM 11/20/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > >What commit are you talking about ? Please provide a URL from > http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/archive/2003/cvs-all/ > >so we know what you are referring to. > > > > ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 10:43:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72D716A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:43:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pit.databus.com (p70-227.acedsl.com [66.114.70.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791BC43F75 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:43:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: from pit.databus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pit.databus.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAKIhoTb066297; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:43:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: (from barney@localhost) by pit.databus.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hAKIhon5066296; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:43:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from barney) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:43:50 -0500 From: Barney Wolff To: Brett Glass Message-ID: <20031120184350.GA66047@pit.databus.com> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119222207.036287d8@localhost> <6.0.1.1.0.20031120101003.08877350@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031120113043.036bd3f8@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031120113043.036bd3f8@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.38 cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:43:53 -0000 On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:36:34AM -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > Easiest way to see the commit is by going to > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/twe/twereg.h > > on the CVS Web interface. It seems to say that the changes were > committed on November 6th. The colored diff shows that quite a > few data structures had their packing changed. > > --Brett > > At 08:13 AM 11/20/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > >What commit are you talking about ? Please provide a URL from http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/archive/2003/cvs-all/ > >so we know what you are referring to. Brett, scroll down and make use of the "View only Branch" picklist. -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 10:49:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166F916A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:49:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from qhmail2.colt1.inetserver.de (qhmail2.colt1.inetserver.de [195.234.228.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF91943F75 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:49:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.oe@x-trader.de) Received: from lupo.gn.qhintra.net (unknown [213.83.51.133]) by qhmail2.colt1.inetserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758D3AB4C1 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:49:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from ente (ente.gn.qhintra.net [192.168.192.2]) by lupo.gn.qhintra.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E247B29F0A for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:49:41 +0100 (CET) From: "Markus Oestreicher" To: Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:49:38 +0100 Message-ID: <033e01c3af97$0d013010$02c0a8c0@gnbuero.qhintra.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: Freeze after "Booting [kernel]" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:49:46 -0000 Dear all, I installed a new FreeBSD 4.9 machine from CD. The installation runs fine but on the first reboot the machine hangs after the "Booting [kernel]..." prompt. I see the first "/" and then the boot process stops. "boot -v" doesn't give more output. When interrupting the loader at this point I can 'ls' the root partition without problems. /etc/fstab also looks okay. The machine has one 120 GB IBM disk. I found some references to a wrong geometry so I changed it to the values printed on the HDD itself (C/H/S: 16383 / 16 / 63) on a second try. This did not work either. Any ideas? Thank you! Best Regards, Markus From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 11:33:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4873616A4CF for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:33:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A42443F3F for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:33:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1AMuYp-0002f7-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:33:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:33:51 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031120193351.GD3321@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20031118001514.GC15325@pir.net> <20031120094552.M48733@carver.gumbysoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031120094552.M48733@carver.gumbysoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Subject: Re: Hang on boot with 4.9-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:33:57 -0000 Doug White probably said: > Well this is crazy. APM doesn't play well under SMP and for some reason > you're not using ACPI. Can you try compiling acpi into your kernel and > retrying? The reason I'm not using ACPI is that is previously wasn't available with 4.x and I have no need for it. APM has been playing nicely with SMP for me since at least 4.7. They currently running 4.8-RELEASE-p13, so I'd call this a bug introduced between 4.8 and 4.9. Once I can easily powercycle the machines and schedule time for one to be down I can do a binary search in cvsup dates to try and pin it down. I can only test new kernels when I'm around to go power cycle them when they hang (until I can put the remote controlled power strip in that rack to do it remotely), so I can test ACPI but not today. > Xeons are Xeons and not P4s. Big difference :) Yeah, them. > What motherboard? I know it's a Supermicro motherboard, Intel serverworks chipset and ICH3 based, with a dual channel adaptec U160 scsi controller on board plus one 10/100 ether and one gig ether. Possibly a X5DMS-6GM. I've got three of them racked in a machine room in 1U cases from aslab.com, I'll have to pull one and open it up to get the exact motherboard model. P. chip0@pci0:0:0: class=0x060000 card=0x358015d9 chip=0x25408086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'E7500 System Controller (MCH, Hub Interface A)' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI none0@pci0:0:1: class=0xff0000 card=0x358015d9 chip=0x25418086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'E7500 System Controller (MCH, Hub Interface A) Error Reporter' pcib1@pci0:2:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x25438086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'E7500/E7501 HI_B Virtual PCI-to-PCI Bridge' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI uhci0@pci0:29:0: class=0x0c0300 card=0x358015d9 chip=0x24828086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801CA/CAM (ICH3-S/ICH3-M) USB Controller #1' class = serial bus subclass = USB uhci1@pci0:29:1: class=0x0c0300 card=0x358015d9 chip=0x24848086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801CA/CAM (ICH3-S/ICH3-M) USB Controller #2' class = serial bus subclass = USB uhci2@pci0:29:2: class=0x0c0300 card=0x358015d9 chip=0x24878086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801CA/CAM (ICH3-S/ICH3-M) USB Controller #3' class = serial bus subclass = USB pcib4@pci0:30:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x244e8086 rev=0x42 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801BA/CA/DB (ICH2/3/4) Hub Interface to PCI Bridge (244E)' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI isab0@pci0:31:0: class=0x060100 card=0x00000000 chip=0x24808086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801CA/CAM (ICH3-S/ICH3-M) LPC Interface' class = bridge subclass = PCI-ISA atapci0@pci0:31:1: class=0x01018a card=0x358015d9 chip=0x248b8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801CA (ICH3) UltraATA/100 EIDE Controller' class = mass storage subclass = ATA none1@pci0:31:3: class=0x0c0500 card=0x358015d9 chip=0x24838086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801CA/CAM (ICH3-S/ICH3-M) SMBus Controller' class = serial bus subclass = SMBus none2@pci1:28:0: class=0x080020 card=0x358015d9 chip=0x14618086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82870P2 I/OxAPIC Interrupt Controller' class = base peripheral subclass = interrupt controller pcib2@pci1:29:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000050 chip=0x14608086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82870P2 P64H2 PCI/PCI-X Hub Controller' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI none3@pci1:30:0: class=0x080020 card=0x358015d9 chip=0x14618086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82870P2 I/OxAPIC Interrupt Controller' class = base peripheral subclass = interrupt controller pcib3@pci1:31:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000050 chip=0x14608086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82870P2 P64H2 PCI/PCI-X Hub Controller' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI ahc0@pci3:2:0: class=0x010000 card=0x900515d9 chip=0x00cf9005 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Adaptec' device = 'AIC-7899 Ultra160 SCSI Host Adapter' class = mass storage subclass = SCSI ahc1@pci3:2:1: class=0x010000 card=0x900515d9 chip=0x00cf9005 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Adaptec' device = 'AIC-7899 Ultra160 SCSI Host Adapter' class = mass storage subclass = SCSI em0@pci3:4:0: class=0x020000 card=0x100d8086 chip=0x100d8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82544GC Gigabit Ethernet Controller (LOM)' class = network subclass = ethernet none4@pci4:1:0: class=0x030000 card=0x00081002 chip=0x47521002 rev=0x27 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'ATI Technologies' device = 'Rage XL PCI' class = display subclass = VGA fxp0@pci4:2:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10508086 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x0d hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82557/8/9 EtherExpress PRO/100(B) Ethernet Adapter' class = network subclass = ethernet -- pir From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 12:06:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B29A16A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:06:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6868C43FDD for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:06:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1AMv45-0002sa-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:06:09 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:06:09 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031120200609.GF3321@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20031118001514.GC15325@pir.net> <20031120094552.M48733@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20031120193351.GD3321@pir.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031120193351.GD3321@pir.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Subject: Re: Hang on boot with 4.9-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:06:11 -0000 Peter Radcliffe probably said: > I know it's a Supermicro motherboard, Intel serverworks chipset and > ICH3 based, with a dual channel adaptec U160 scsi controller on board > plus one 10/100 ether and one gig ether. Possibly a X5DMS-6GM. The motherboard model is actually a supermicro P4DPR-6GM+. P. -- pir From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 12:52:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E3A16A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:52:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E04C43FDD for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:52:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA10474; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:52:09 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031120134852.04302668@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:52:06 -0700 To: Mike Tancsa , stable@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20031120134324.092acbd0@209.112.4.2> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119222207.036287d8@localhost> <6.0.1.1.0.20031120101003.08877350@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031120113043.036bd3f8@localhost> <6.0.1.1.0.20031120134324.092acbd0@209.112.4.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:52:15 -0000 Some recent message traffic indicated that these changes were important to the operation of vinum, which did not work properly unless they were incorporated. That's why I'm curious about whether they're necessary. --Brett At 11:46 AM 11/20/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote: >I only see the commit to HEAD and not STABLE. > > ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 13:29:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E130B16A4CF for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:29:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9829F43FB1 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:29:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAKLTUm5044073; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:29:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAKLTXUr028185; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:29:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20031120163143.088deb98@209.112.4.2> X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:33:51 -0500 To: Brett Glass , stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031120134852.04302668@localhost> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119222207.036287d8@localhost> <6.0.1.1.0.20031120101003.08877350@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031120113043.036bd3f8@localhost> <6.0.1.1.0.20031120134324.092acbd0@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031120134852.04302668@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:29:38 -0000 And you are going to use vinum on the twe controller and not apply the fix for vinum on the twe ? Really, you should try it for yourself as others have said, or be more specific about what you are asking. ---Mike At 03:52 PM 20/11/2003, Brett Glass wrote: >Some recent message traffic indicated that these changes were >important to the operation of vinum, which did not work properly >unless they were incorporated. That's why I'm curious about whether >they're necessary. > >--Brett > >At 11:46 AM 11/20/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > >I only see the commit to HEAD and not STABLE. > > > > ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 13:42:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DF016A4CF for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:42:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.omnis.com (smtp.omnis.com [216.239.128.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F6E43F85 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:42:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from salty.rapid.stbernard.com (corp-2.ipinc.com [199.245.188.2]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF45372DF7; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:41:46 -0800 (PST) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr.com To: Brett Glass , Mark Linimon Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:42:29 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> <200311200916.08563.wes@softweyr.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20031120102709.036c8128@localhost> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031120102709.036c8128@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311201342.29603.wes@softweyr.com> cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:42:42 -0000 On Thursday 20 November 2003 09:30, Brett Glass wrote: > At 10:16 AM 11/20/2003, Wes Peters wrote: > >> That's not what I'm asking for, of course. I'm asking to hear > >> if anyone has already had experience with the hardware and > >> software in question. It's mutually beneficial to everyone in the > >> community if this information is shared widely. > > > >Yes, and the mail list archives and FAQs help there, but somebody at > > some point has to be the pioneer. > > I see nothing wrong with asking first, so that I know whether I need > to BE the pioneer! After all, if folks do not do this, then we could > have more people than necessary sporting those unsightly arrows in > their backs. So, IMHO, it is not appropriate to criticize people for > posting queries. I'm sorry, I didn't speak/write clearly enough. You did NOTHING wrong, and did manage to bring out somebody who has had success. I look forward to reading your reports of success too. I hope you collect as few arrows as possible on this go-around, I know you've got quite a collection already. Oh, wait, that just conjured up yet another scary JPEG: anyone tried to use an XYZCorp frobnicator-2003 with FreeBSD 9.3 yet? go check the tags on the arrows sticking out of Brett's backside for the XYZ logo Now if we just had a staff cartoonist for this list... ;^) -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 13:45:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5DB16A4CF for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:45:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCF043FD7 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:45:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA11319; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:44:57 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031120144235.0373c150@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:44:54 -0700 To: Mike Tancsa , stable@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20031120163143.088deb98@209.112.4.2> References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031119222207.036287d8@localhost> <6.0.1.1.0.20031120101003.08877350@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031120113043.036bd3f8@localhost> <6.0.1.1.0.20031120134324.092acbd0@209.112.4.2> <6.0.0.22.2.20031120134852.04302668@localhost> <6.0.1.1.0.20031120163143.088deb98@209.112.4.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:45:04 -0000 I apologize if what I was not as clear as I might have been. What I'm asking is whether any of the fixes that were put in for vinum might also be necessary for UFS. I have a limited time to take the machine down and need to have as much foreknowledge as possible of what I might need to do to bring it up under 4.9-RELEASE. --Brett Glass At 02:33 PM 11/20/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote: >Really, you should try it for yourself as others have said, or be >more specific about what you are asking. > > ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 13:58:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDF016A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:58:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEC743FBD for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:58:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA11532; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:58:24 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031120145705.0364cf78@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:58:21 -0700 To: Wes Peters , Mark Linimon From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <200311201342.29603.wes@softweyr.com> References: <6.0.0.22.2.20031119175153.04469f90@localhost> <200311200916.08563.wes@softweyr.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20031120102709.036c8128@localhost> <200311201342.29603.wes@softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:58:31 -0000 At 02:42 PM 11/20/2003, Wes Peters wrote: >Oh, wait, that just conjured up yet another scary JPEG: > > anyone tried to use an XYZCorp frobnicator-2003 with > FreeBSD 9.3 yet? > go check the tags on the arrows sticking out of Brett's > backside for the XYZ logo Naw, the tag for that one is on the arrow which goes in through my left temple and out the the right. ;-) --Brett From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 15:04:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6851016A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:04:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB98743F85 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:04:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E52172DB5; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:04:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAAF72DAD for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:04:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:04:33 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20031120193351.GD3321@pir.net> Message-ID: <20031120150136.P50912@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20031118001514.GC15325@pir.net> <20031120094552.M48733@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20031120193351.GD3321@pir.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Hang on boot with 4.9-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:04:34 -0000 On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Peter Radcliffe wrote: > Doug White probably said: > > Well this is crazy. APM doesn't play well under SMP and for some reason > > you're not using ACPI. Can you try compiling acpi into your kernel and > > retrying? > > The reason I'm not using ACPI is that is previously wasn't available > with 4.x and I have no need for it. I believe it uses the improved interrupt and CPU tables, but I might be confusing it with -current. > I can only test new kernels when I'm around to go power cycle them > when they hang (until I can put the remote controlled power strip in > that rack to do it remotely), so I can test ACPI but not today. That doesn't help much :( > > What motherboard? > > I know it's a Supermicro motherboard, Intel serverworks chipset and > ICH3 based, with a dual channel adaptec U160 scsi controller on board > plus one 10/100 ether and one gig ether. Possibly a X5DMS-6GM. Intel is Intel. ServerWorks is owned by Broadcom. They are separate companies. > chip0@pci0:0:0: class=0x060000 card=0x358015d9 chip=0x25408086 rev=0x03 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = 'E7500 System Controller (MCH, Hub Interface A)' > class = bridge > subclass = HOST-PCI OK, so Intel E7500 chipset. I've run -stable and -current on that in the past without issue, so it could be recent breakage. I don't run my machines with apm so I'm not sure where its hanging at. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 15:06:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EC916A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:06:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E84843F93 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:06:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83D8272DBD; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:06:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A7672DB8; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:06:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:06:39 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: Markus Oestreicher In-Reply-To: <033e01c3af97$0d013010$02c0a8c0@gnbuero.qhintra.net> Message-ID: <20031120150524.O50912@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <033e01c3af97$0d013010$02c0a8c0@gnbuero.qhintra.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freeze after "Booting [kernel]" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:06:42 -0000 On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Markus Oestreicher wrote: > Dear all, > > I installed a new FreeBSD 4.9 machine from CD. The installation > runs fine but on the first reboot the machine hangs after the > "Booting [kernel]..." prompt. I see the first "/" and then the > boot process stops. "boot -v" doesn't give more output. Try rigging a serial console and see if things are actually progressing. Very early on the video card gets some initialization and it might be freaking out, causing your screen to turn off. If the system is crashing, you'll see the messages. Instructions are in the Handbook. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 15:23:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CE616A4D0 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:23:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B4243FBF for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:23:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1AMy96-0004MS-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:23:32 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:23:32 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031120232332.GI3321@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20031118001514.GC15325@pir.net> <20031120094552.M48733@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20031120193351.GD3321@pir.net> <20031120150136.P50912@carver.gumbysoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031120150136.P50912@carver.gumbysoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Subject: Re: Hang on boot with 4.9-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:23:33 -0000 Doug White probably said: > > The reason I'm not using ACPI is that is previously wasn't available > > with 4.x and I have no need for it. > I believe it uses the improved interrupt and CPU tables, but I might be > confusing it with -current. First I've heard of any benifit to using ACPI on a motherboard that does APM, particularly with how broken a lot of ACPI code (in FreeBSD and on laptops and other machines) has been and ACPI in 4.x being labelled experimental. None of it has sounded like something I wanted to mess with on production machines. > > I can only test new kernels when I'm around to go power cycle them > > when they hang (until I can put the remote controlled power strip in > > that rack to do it remotely), so I can test ACPI but not today. > That doesn't help much :( These are production machines, I can't just pull them out of service whenever I feel like it. None of the other machines I have that are running 4.9-R or 4.9-STABLE are exibiting the same problem. > Intel is Intel. ServerWorks is owned by Broadcom. They are separate > companies. Intel sell motherboards they label as ServerWorks; http://www.intel.com/design/servers/buildingblocks/srsh4_spsh4/index.htm I was told that this motherboard was a serverworks motherboard in part because it had the serial console features I needed. I may have been misinformed - I don't keep track of most PC things. This is the motherboard I have; http://www.supermicro.com/PRODUCT/MotherBoards/E7501/X5DMS-6GM.htm > OK, so Intel E7500 chipset. I've run -stable and -current on that > in the past without issue, so it could be recent breakage. I've been running 4.x on several of these motherboards for months with no problems, until 4.9. P. -- pir From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 18:06:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D416116A4CE; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:06:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from access.inet.co.th (access.inet.co.th [203.151.127.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B1D43FF7; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:06:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from firak.thai-aec.org (TruPPPv92-230-120.inet.co.th [203.151.230.120]) by access.inet.co.th (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id hAL262bC096577; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:06:04 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from firak.thai-aec.org (localhost.thai-aec.org [127.0.0.1]) by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAL25g6r000362; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:05:42 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: (from pirat@localhost) by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hAL25ekg000361; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:05:40 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) X-Authentication-Warning: firak.thai-aec.org: pirat set sender to pirat@access.inet.co.th using -f Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:05:40 +0700 From: pirat To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" Message-ID: <20031121020540.GA326@thai-aec.org> References: <20031119105914.GA20096@thai-aec.org> <20031120013737.GF22360@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=tis-620 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031120013737.GF22360@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD firak.thai-aec.org 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE www-home-page: http://www.thai-aec.org www-FreeBSD-page: http://www.thai.net/makham cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Dell Inspiron 1100 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 02:06:10 -0000 On Thursday, 20 November 2003 at 12:07:37 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:07:37 +1030 > From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" > To: pirat > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: Dell Inspiron 1100 and FreeBSD > > [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] > > Single line paragraph. > > On Wednesday, 19 November 2003 at 17:59:14 +0700, pirat wrote: > > hi sirs, > > > > i have one notebook from dell, inspiron 1100. i would like to know > > if this notebook can be used with freebsd or not. it has on board > > broadcom nic. but the current os - linux TLE - does not `see' it > > also. > > This is pretty much the same as the Inspiron 5100 I have. The onboard > NIC is supported in stable, but I had some problems starting X: the > BIOS wasn't completely mapped, and I had to compile it in to the > server. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-jul2003.html#25 for more > details. > i try to install 4.7-release, the available cd at hand now, to my inspiron 1100 but that release does not `see' bge card also. i also download bcm-0308252140.tar.gz after have a look at -hackers but fail to make. [bank] /sys/modules/bcm # make Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/sys/modules/bcm @ -> /usr/src/sys machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include perl @/kern/makeops.pl -h @/kern/device_if.m perl @/kern/makeops.pl -h @/dev/mii/miibus_if.m make: don't know how to make miidevs.h. Stop just one more asking, is driver for bcm 440x the same as for bcm 570x ? tia -- with best regards, psr http://www.thai-aec.org http://www.thai.net/makham From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 19:02:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860BF16A4CF for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:02:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (bay8-f46.bay8.hotmail.com [64.4.27.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE06643FDD for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:02:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd_stable@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:02:13 -0800 Received: from 219.76.64.2 by by8fd.bay8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:02:13 GMT X-Originating-IP: [219.76.64.2] X-Originating-Email: [freebsd_stable@hotmail.com] From: "nobody nobody" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:02:13 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2003 03:02:13.0820 (UTC) FILETIME=[DD12C7C0:01C3AFDB] Subject: how to make $PACKAGES/INDEX X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:02:14 -0000 Hello, I recently learnt how to build my own packages for my disc1 iso. However, I didn't how to build the $PACKAGES/INDEX which I believe to be used for package selection during the new system installation. If there a way to do it or I just copy the /usr/ports/INDEX to $PACKAGES/INDEX. Thanks. Clarence _________________________________________________________________ Linguaphone : Learning English? Get Japanese lessons for FREE http://go.msnserver.com/HK/30476.asp From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 19:51:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB6716A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:51:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37FF43FF5 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:51:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAL3pShk065961; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:21:28 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: "nobody nobody" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:21:27 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311211421.27710.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -4.4 () CARRIAGE_RETURNS,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Subject: Re: how to make $PACKAGES/INDEX X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:51:33 -0000 On Friday 21 November 2003 13:32, nobody nobody wrote: > I recently learnt how to build my own packages for my disc1 iso. However, > I didn't how to build the $PACKAGES/INDEX which I believe to be used for > package selection during the new system installation. If there a way to do > it or I just copy the /usr/ports/INDEX to $PACKAGES/INDEX. Thanks. Copy the INDEX file from /usr/ports. You can scrub non-present entries with /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/release/scrubindex.pl -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 22:13:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A5F16A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:13:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from tnpsmtp.telenor.se (franklin.telenor.se [213.150.135.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CE043FE1 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:13:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from parlei@algonet.se) Received: from kairos.algonet.se (kairos.algonet.se [213.150.135.237]) by franklin.telenor.se (BMR ErlangTM/OTP 3.1) with ESMTP id 687183.395189.1069.0s8880123franklin ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:13:09 +0100 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:13:08 +0100 (MET) From: Par Leijonhufvud To: Andrew In-Reply-To: <3FBB9FA1.2030803@auliya.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with Rhine III card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 06:13:13 -0000 On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Andrew wrote: > >ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" > >ifconfig_vr0="inet 213.132.119.242 netmask 255.255.255.0" > You're giving the interface two different sets of instructions, dhcp and > a static IP. If it's meant to be dhcp, comment out the line giving it an > IP (...inet 213..etc.) and run dhclient vn0. That shoudl give you an > address you're meant to have. Nope, did not work (tried "dhclient", "dhclient vr0" and "dhclient vn0" -- making sure there were no running dhclient processes before each -- and none gave me network). Someone suggested that the card was a troublesome one, perhaps I should throw money at the problem and buy something else. The local store sells 3Com 3C905C for a reasonable price, anyone know if that might be a better choice? /Par -- Par Leijonhufvud par@hunter-gatherer.org I think, however, that you will find that, online or in realspace, entering an ongoing conversation and insulting the people conducting it is not a good way of obtaining information. --David Friedman From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 02:02:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539A916A4CE for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 02:02:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from qhmail2.colt1.inetserver.de (qhmail2.colt1.inetserver.de [195.234.228.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE5443F85 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 02:02:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.oe@x-trader.de) Received: from lupo.gn.qhintra.net (unknown [213.83.51.133]) by qhmail2.colt1.inetserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E86BAB48D for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:02:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from ente (ente.gn.qhintra.net [192.168.192.2]) by lupo.gn.qhintra.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D73B29F0A; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:02:30 +0100 (CET) From: "Markus Oestreicher" To: "'Doug White'" , "'Markus Oestreicher'" Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:02:29 +0100 Message-ID: <03b101c3b016$9363dbb0$02c0a8c0@gnbuero.qhintra.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <20031120150524.O50912@carver.gumbysoft.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freeze after "Booting [kernel]" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:02:34 -0000 Dear Doug, > > I installed a new FreeBSD 4.9 machine from CD. The installation > > runs fine but on the first reboot the machine hangs after the > > "Booting [kernel]..." prompt. I see the first "/" and then the > > boot process stops. "boot -v" doesn't give more output. > > Try rigging a serial console and see if things are actually > progressing. > Very early on the video card gets some initialization and it might be > freaking out, causing your screen to turn off. If the system > is crashing, > you'll see the messages. The serial console shows the same output: --- BootMgr: F1 FreeBSD Default: F1 --- FreeBSD loader: BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 Console: internal video/keyboard BIOS drive A: is disk0 BIOS drive C: is disk1 BIOS 637kB/522240kB available memory FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 0.8 (root@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca, Fri Oct 17 20:16:05 GMT 2003) Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf /kernel text=0x327335 data=0x4dab0+0x349c4 syms=[0x4+0x45350+0x4+0x4d77b] \ Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt. --- Boot prompt: Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help. ok ok ls / / d dev d usr d var d stand d etc d cdrom d proc d dist d bin d boot d mnt d modules d root d sbin d tmp l sys .cshrc .profile COPYRIGHT kernel.GENERIC kernel l compat ok boot -v ... and then the boot process stops. Do you think it is a problem with the drive's geometry? bye Markus From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 06:05:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B1216A4CE; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 06:05:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9546C43FB1; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 06:05:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2003112114052201300iqddde>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:05:22 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 96C4E59; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:05:21 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: oli@bronskill.com References: <3FBBC3AA.6050203@bronskill.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 21 Nov 2003 09:05:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3FBBC3AA.6050203@bronskill.com> Message-ID: <44d6blizq6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 104 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: loader(8) question X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:05:26 -0000 [Note: redirected to freebsd-stable] Oliver Neubauer writes: > Hello, > > I just recently upgraded from 4.3 to 4.9 RELEASE by doing a clean install. > While I am able to boot the system fully, I have noticed the error > message "no /boot/loader" upon inital boot, with: "loader(8) metadata > missing" showing up a bit later one during the boot process. > > I don't know about the second message, but I can definitely say that > /boot/loader exists with rx permission for all.....I haven't changed a > thing since installing. > > I've come across quite a few questions about this in forums and > whatnot, but very little in the way of answers. Can anyone shed some > light? > > dmesg follows > > Thanks! > o > > Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #0: Wed Nov 19 12:12:57 EST 2003 > root@smpbsd:/usr/src/sys/compile/SMPBSD > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz > CPU: Pentium Pro (199.43-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x619 Stepping = 9 > Features=0xfbff > real memory = 234881024 (229376K bytes) > avail memory = 225148928 (219872K bytes) > Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 > IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard: 2 CPUs > cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 > cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 > io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00170011, at 0xfec00000 > Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled > md0: Malloc disk > npx0: on motherboard > npx0: INT 16 interface > pcib0: on motherboard > IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> irq 2 > IOAPIC #0 intpin 18 -> irq 10 > pci0: on pcib0 > isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > atapci0: port 0xe800-0xe80f at device 1.1 > on pci0 > ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 > ahc0: port 0xe000-0xe0ff mem > 0xf9000000-0xf9000fff irq 2 at device 9.0 on pci0 > aic7860: Ultra Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 3/253 SCBs > pci0: at 10.0 irq 10 > vr0: port 0xd800-0xd87f mem > 0xf8800000-0xf880007f irq 2 at device 13.0 on pci0 > vr0: Ethernet address: 00:50:ba:a1:a7:5b > miibus0: on vr0 > amphy0: on miibus0 > amphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > orm0: