From owner-freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 9 09:29:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCB416A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:29:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from forrie.com (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.62.205.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7002643D46 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:29:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from forrie.com (i-95.forrie.net. [192.168.1.95]) by forrie.com with ESMTP id i29HSrXF047855 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:28:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Message-ID: <404DFED3.6040707@forrie.com> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:28:51 -0500 From: Forrest Aldrich User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5+ (Windows/20040308) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.3.0(snapshot 20010925) (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com) X-MailScanner-LocalNet: Found to be clean Subject: OpenAFS status? X-BeenThere: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: The Andrew File System and FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:29:03 -0000 Hi there, I wonder what the status is of OpenAFS porting to FreeBSD 5.x -- I've seen a few older posts on the net that indicated there were several issues that needed to be dealt with (client), etc. Thanks, Forrest From owner-freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 9 10:52:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355D116A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:52:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.server.rpi.edu (smtp1.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D836643D2D for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:52:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp1.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i29IqeLW009303; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:52:40 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <404DFED3.6040707@forrie.com> References: <404DFED3.6040707@forrie.com> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:52:39 -0500 To: Forrest Aldrich , freebsd-afs@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: OpenAFS status? X-BeenThere: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: The Andrew File System and FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:52:49 -0000 At 12:28 PM -0500 3/9/04, Forrest Aldrich wrote: >Hi there, > >I wonder what the status is of OpenAFS porting to FreeBSD >5.x -- I've seen a few older posts on the net that indicated >there were several issues that needed to be dealt with >(client), etc. This mailing list (the freebsd-afs one) is for a much earlier attempt to get AFS working under FreeBSD. There is no real activity on this list. These days, all the real activity is on the OpenAFS mailing lists. There is a port-freebsd mailing list at OpenAFS.org The status is that Garrett Wollman did a bunch of work to get the client working much better on 5.x. Jim Rees is in the process of committing those changes to the official OpenAFS source code. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu