From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 04:57:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D5916A4CE; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:57:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C52C43D3F; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:57:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.250]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6B4vTVT079435; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 21:57:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6B4vTlX040546; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 21:57:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6B4vSlx040545; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 21:57:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 21:57:28 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: amd64@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040711045728.GB40508@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: HEADSUP [amd64]: New KDB framework untested. X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:57:29 -0000 Gang, Since I don't have an amd64 box myself, I could not test the new KDB framework. So, I pretty much made sure it compiled and since amd64 is in many ways very similar to i386, there's a good chance I got it right. But obviously when it's not tested there's a big chance it contains bugs or is just plain broken. You might want to pay special attention to it... FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net