Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:18:51 +0200 (EET) From: Dmitry Cherkasov <chd@qq.org.ua> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: docs/64534: misfitting in two parts of man 8 ipfw about quantity of ports that may be specified in a rule Message-ID: <200403211118.i2LBIpZi017086@joker.intercom.net.ua> Resent-Message-ID: <200403211120.i2LBKCmT083885@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 64534 >Category: docs >Synopsis: misfitting in two parts of man 8 ipfw about quantity of ports that may be specified in a rule >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-doc >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Mar 21 03:20:12 PST 2004 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Dmitry Cherkasov >Release: FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE i386 >Organization: ISP Intercom >Environment: FreeBSD eyes.intercom.net.ua 5.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE #2: Sun Jan 25 19:59:30 EET 2004 rain@eyes.intercom.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EYES i386 >Description: There is a misfitting in two parts of man 8 ipfw about quantity of ports that may be specified in a rule. In the Section RULE BODY in the description of 'ports' pattern it is said: "The length of the port list is limited to 30 ports or ranges, ..." while later in the Section IPFW2 ENHANCEMENTS, subsection "Port specifications" it is mentioned a different length of the port list: "ipfw1 ... is limited to 10 entries instead of the 15 allowed by ipfw2." >How-To-Repeat: man ipfw | grep "is limited to" >Fix: Probably "15" should be changed to "30" in the second cite. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403211118.i2LBIpZi017086>