Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:51:36 +0100
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at>
Subject:   Re: Updated geom_vinum 
Message-ID:  <50679.1075020696@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:48:57 %2B1030." <20040124231857.GM20359@wantadilla.lemis.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040124231857.GM20359@wantadilla.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"
 writes:
>
>--4oF+6Ged69J0+4/e
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>On Saturday, 24 January 2004 at  8:44:43 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <20040124013406.GB20359@wantadilla.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"
>>  writes:
>>
>>> While a lot of things go away as the result of GEOM, others don't,
>>> like the I/O stats and revive parameters for example.
>>
>> Geom takes care of the I/O stats, see gstat(8)
>
>It only does a subset of the Vinum stats.

What is missing ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50679.1075020696>