From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 2 02:17:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F5B16A4CF for ; Sun, 2 May 2004 02:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail014.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail014.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B20843D41 for ; Sun, 2 May 2004 02:17:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) i429Gm718763; Sun, 2 May 2004 19:16:49 +1000 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1])i429Ghcj043622; Sun, 2 May 2004 19:16:48 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jeremyp@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from jeremyp@localhost)i429GZI7043621; Sun, 2 May 2004 19:16:35 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jeremyp) Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 19:16:35 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: Olaf Hoyer Message-ID: <20040502091635.GA32358@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20040426171939.U55433@gaff.hhhr.ision.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040426171939.U55433@gaff.hhhr.ision.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org cc: "Andrew, Juan" Subject: Re: looking for a FreeBSD hardware solution for a web server farm X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 09:17:07 -0000 On Mon, 2004-Apr-26 17:21:35 +0200, Olaf Hoyer wrote: >Well, Sun V60x or 65x will do, they are relabelled Intel OEM boxes, or >HP 380 G3, nice thing, also quite sturdy. My experience with an HP DL380 G3 is the opposite - I get random interrupt storms that wedged the box until I added code to force a panic if I get more than about 5000 interrupts/sec. The NICs are also fairly dodgy at fast-ethernet speed. Peter