Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 16:43:40 +0300 From: "Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir" <blacksir@number.ru> To: "Gleb Smirnoff" <glebius@cell.sick.ru>, "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ng_netflow: testers are welcome Message-ID: <NKEJKOHEKMBIMCCEHEPKGEOFCEAA.blacksir@number.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040221235815.GA62385@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yep... But it not so obvious for man like me, who thought just a week ago that netgraph is something beetween net & graphics... like MRTG LOL Another question: Is is possible that ng_netflow take packets _after_ they are diverted by natd? I apologise, that this would require divert implemented as netgraph node? So... I have no idea how this would work with ipfw ruleset... Any ideas? > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gleb Smirnoff > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 2:58 AM > To: Julian Elischer > Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Bjoern A. Zeeb; Vasenin Alexander aka > BlackSir; freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: ng_netflow: testers are welcome > Is it possible to make port dependant on kernel module > shipped with base system? How? > For example sysutils/ips is not dependant on ipfw. It is obvious > that ipfw is required for it, as well as in case of netgraph > and ng_netflow.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NKEJKOHEKMBIMCCEHEPKGEOFCEAA.blacksir>