From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr 18 04:57:30 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A252116A4CE
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 18 Apr 2004 04:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AF043D1F
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 18 Apr 2004 04:57:29 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id 39E89531F; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:57:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id AF250530D; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:55:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id 3341733C6C; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:55:43 +0200 (CEST)
To: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com>
References: <20040417190059.06B0316A4F7@hub.freebsd.org>
	<20040418031017.98ACEDAC11@mx7.roble.com>
From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:55:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20040418031017.98ACEDAC11@mx7.roble.com> (Roger Marquis's
 message of "Sat, 17 Apr 2004 20:10:17 -0700 (PDT)")
Message-ID: <xzpr7ul7b5s.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63
cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is log_in_vain really good or really bad?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 11:57:30 -0000

Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> writes:
> This is hardware problem.  Any ATA/SATA disk will suck up CPU with
> every disk access.  The solution is to switch to SCSI.

This is simply not true, and hasn't been for about ten years.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no