From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 13:48:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D248A16A4CE for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:48:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE4243D41 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:48:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0ILmRTr000327; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:48:27 -0500 (EST) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i0ILmR2T000326; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:48:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:48:27 -0500 From: Ken Smith To: Rich Hampton Message-ID: <20040118214826.GA39@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <40095F5D.40607@hamptonhouse.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40095F5D.40607@hamptonhouse.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Creator 3D trouble X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 21:48:32 -0000 On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 09:14:21AM -0700, Rich Hampton wrote: > Did you guys ever get a handle on this? I'm have exactly the same problem. > If I comment out sc, the kernel boots normally. There have been some reports of success but I have not been able to piece together the messages to come up with a working system. My attempts so far have the same result - white screen and machine locks up completely (doesn't make it to the point I can log in via ssh, though with a GENERIC kernel with no other modifications to the system it comes up on the net). Would someone with a working config file mind posting the entire thing? I'm missing the addition or removal of something... -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 19:06:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2987116A4CE; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 19:06:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp2.server.rpi.edu (smtp2.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD7643D2F; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 19:06:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp2.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0J36CO2011449; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:06:13 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <40096688.7040304@mindspring.com> References: <200312212239.38557.craig@xfoil.gank.org> <20040106095942.O66232@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20040106182824.GA42422@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040107174346.GA50142@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040111093043.GA11120@dragon.nuxi.com> <40096688.7040304@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:06:11 -0500 To: richardcoleman@mindspring.com, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: Gearing up for 64-bit time_t on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 03:06:17 -0000 At 11:44 AM -0500 1/17/04, Richard Coleman wrote: >Any idea on when we might make the jump to 64 bit time_t? We >probably want to do it soon, and give ourselves a few months >before the release. That way, there will be plenty of time >to fix any troubles with ports. A few people have tried my script and followed the instructions in my special "UPDATING.64BTT" file. No one as reported any problems to me, and at least a few people have reported that it has worked for them. I agree with your view, but I am not sure what is appropriate for me to do at this point. I could just commit the "installworld_nk" and "UPDATING.64BTT" files to /usr/src, but it wouldn't surprise me if that caused a few people to scream at me. Also, as mentioned in the UPDATING.64BTT file, we need to have a binary-version of 'cvsup-without-gui' available, one which has been compiled on a 64-bit time_t system. I have one of those, so it's a matter of where should we put it for people who will need it. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 20:21:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26CC16A4CE for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 20:21:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (coyote.seekingfire.com [24.72.10.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2E443D55 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 20:21:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6B9B2F4; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:21:44 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:21:44 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040119042144.GC24105@seekingfire.com> References: <20040106095942.O66232@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20040106182824.GA42422@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040107174346.GA50142@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040111093043.GA11120@dragon.nuxi.com> <40096688.7040304@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-GPG-Key-ID: 828AFC7B X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5584 14BA C9EB 1524 0E68 F543 0F0A 7FBC 828A FC7B X-GPG-Key: http://www.seekingfire.com/gpg_key.asc X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: Gearing up for 64-bit time_t on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 04:21:47 -0000 On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 10:06:11PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > A few people have tried my script and followed the instructions > in my special "UPDATING.64BTT" file. No one as reported any > problems to me, and at least a few people have reported that it > has worked for them. That's good to hear. > I agree with your view, but I am not sure what is appropriate for > me to do at this point. I could just commit the "installworld_nk" > and "UPDATING.64BTT" files to /usr/src, but it wouldn't surprise > me if that caused a few people to scream at me. Heh ;-) > Also, as mentioned in the UPDATING.64BTT file, we need to have a > binary-version of 'cvsup-without-gui' available, one which has been > compiled on a 64-bit time_t system. I have one of those, so it's > a matter of where should we put it for people who will need it. I'm waiing for such a plan to be announced, myself :-) While I don't mind taking a /few/ risks with my Ultra 5, it runs a public website and I'd like to minimize downtime. I also have 137 ports installed and I'll need to rebuild them all (for safety) and having a working cvsup is definitely a benefit. That reminds me ... I've trying to move to a system where my i386 -STABLE build host holds the ports tree for my -CURRENT machines as well (to offload the cvsup and INDEX building, but not the package building). I've received a couple of great hints from the stable@ mailing list on this. I wanted to confirm (if possible) that the move to 64bit time_t on Sparc doesn't/shouldn't impact on this. Any opinion on this? Thanks, -T -- If you are not happy here and now, you never will be. Taisen Deshimaru From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 22:23:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69BC16A4CE for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:23:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DC843D41 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:23:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0J6NHt3025958; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 01:23:19 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040119042144.GC24105@seekingfire.com> References: <20040106095942.O66232@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20040106182824.GA42422@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040107174346.GA50142@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040111093043.GA11120@dragon.nuxi.com> <40096688.7040304@mindspring.com> <20040119042144.GC24105@seekingfire.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 01:23:16 -0500 To: Tillman Hodgson , freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: Gearing up for 64-bit time_t on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 06:23:21 -0000 At 10:21 PM -0600 1/18/04, Tillman Hodgson wrote: >On Sun, Jan 18, 2004, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > Also, as mentioned in the UPDATING.64BTT file, we need to > > have a binary-version of 'cvsup-without-gui' available, one > > which has been compiled on a 64-bit time_t system. I have > > one of those, so it's a matter of where should we put it for >people who will need it. > >I'm waiing for such a plan to be announced, myself :-) Well, I have done the following: cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui make && make install && make package that created the file: cvsup-without-gui-16.1h.tbz I renamed that to be: cvsup64btt-without-gui-16.1h.tbz and put it in: ~gad/public_distfiles on my freebsd.org account. I'm not sure if that will do "the right thing", but at least I can say that I provided *something*... >While I don't mind taking a /few/ risks with my Ultra 5, it runs >a public website and I'd like to minimize downtime. I also have >137 ports installed and I'll need to rebuild them all (for safety) >and having a working cvsup is definitely a benefit. I suspect that you should plan on the machine will be out-of-service for at least a few hours while making this change... >That reminds me ... I've trying to move to a system where my i386 >-STABLE build host holds the ports tree for my -CURRENT machines >as well (to offload the cvsup and INDEX building, but not the >package building). I've received a couple of great hints from the >stable@ mailing list on this. I wanted to confirm (if possible) >that the move to 64bit time_t on Sparc doesn't/shouldn't impact >on this. Any opinion on this? You are doing something that I do not do, so all I can do is make an educated guess. How are you getting the /usr/ports tree from your i386 box to your sparc box? NFS? My guess is that should continue to work okay. If you're using something like rsync, then I assume you would have to recompile rsync on the sparc64 machine (after it is upgraded to 64-bit time_t) before it would work correctly. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 06:18:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0458F16A4CE for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 06:18:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from Bizone.inar.ru (is.inar.ru [212.14.160.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0045143D53 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 06:18:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from seal@inar.ru) Received: from localhost ([212.14.161.12])i0JEIA2V065654; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:18:13 +0300 (MSK) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:18:01 +0300 From: Vyacheslav Silakov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62q) Personal Organization: Internet-Arkhangelsk Company; +7 (8182) 650002 ext 2418; ICQ: 117086713 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1811752172.20040119171801@inar.ru> To: seal In-Reply-To: <606239651.20040114161227@inar.ru> References: <144549029.20031230171603@inar.ru> <606239651.20040114161227@inar.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Thomas Moestl cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re[3]: FreeBSD 5.2-RC2 & big 160 gb HDD X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: seal List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:18:41 -0000 Wednesday, January 14, 2004, 4:12:27 PM, you wrote: VS> Tuesday, December 30, 2003, 6:38:19 PM, you wrote: TM>> On Tue, 2003/12/30 at 17:16:03 +0300, Vyacheslav Silakov wrote: >>> >>> Hello >>> >>> During FreeBSD 5.2-RC2 setup process on the Sun Netra X1 >>> with 160 gb HDD drive I've got (with default HDD partition settings): >>> >>> Max Doing newfs -U -O2 /mnt/dev/ad0fad0: >>> ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA recovered from missing interrupt >>> >>> and system completly frozes after that. TM>> Try forcing the disk to UDMA33 (using atacontrol(8)). I have seen TM>> similar problems on a Blade 100; my theory is that the I/O connector TM>> board is electrically unfit to do UDMA66 (looking at the innards of TM>> the box, that does not seem too unlikely). TM>> - Thomas VS> I've used Seagate x86 Ultra ATA Mode Switching Utility VS> http://www.seagate.com/support/disc/utils.html to downgrade disk performance VS> to UDMA33 (is it correct?). But the same problem is still persist on VS> 5.2-RELEASE: system hangs during newfsing with message VS> "WARNING - READ_DMA recovered from missing interrupt". VS> Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. VS> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 VS> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. VS> FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE #0: Sun Jan 11 06:09:12 GMT 2004 VS> root@bobbi.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC VS> Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0852000. VS> Preloaded mfs_root "/boot/mfsroot" at 0xc0852190. VS> Timecounter "tick" frequency 400000000 Hz quality 0 VS> real memory = 268435456 (256 MB) VS> avail memory = 242909184 (231 MB) VS> cpu0: Sun Microsystems UltraSparc-IIe Processor (400.00 MHz CPU) VS> nexus0: VS> pcib0: on nexus0 VS> pcib0: Sabre, impl 0, version 0, ign 0x7c0, bus A VS> pcib0: [FAST] VS> pcib0: [FAST] VS> DVMA map: 0x60000000 to 0x63ffffff VS> pci0: on pcib0 VS> isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 VS> isa0: on isab0 VS> pci0: at device 3.0 (no driver attached) VS> pci0: at device 3.0 (no driver attached) VS> dc0: port 0x10000-0x100ff at device 12.0 on pci0 VS> dc0: Ethernet address: 00:00:00:00:00:00 VS> miibus0: on dc0 VS> ukphy0: on miibus0 VS> ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto VS> dc1: port 0x10100-0x101ff mem 0x2000-0x20ff at de VS> vice 5.0 on pci0 VS> dc1: Ethernet address: 00:00:00:00:00:00 VS> miibus1: on dc1 VS> ukphy1: on miibus1 VS> ukphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto VS> pci0: at device 10.0 (no driver attached) VS> atapci0: port 0x10220-0x1022f,0x10208-0x102 VS> 0b,0x10210-0x10217,0x10218-0x1021b,0x10200-0x10207 at device 13.0 on pci0 VS> atapci0: [MPSAFE] VS> ata2: at 0x10200 on atapci0 VS> ata2: [MPSAFE] VS> ata3: at 0x10210 on atapci0 VS> ata3: [MPSAFE] VS> Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec VS> md0: Preloaded image 4194304 bytes at 0xc044e9a8 VS> GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xfffff800607b60a0 VS> ad0: 152627MB [310101/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA33 VS> acd0: CDRW at ata3-master PIO4 VS> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0 VS> warning: no time-of-day clock registered, system time will not be set accurately VS> /stand/sysinstall running as init on serial console I've got working configuration: FreeBSD Disklabel Editor Disk: ad0 Partition name: ad0 Free: 45770256 blocks (22348MB) Part Mount Size Newfs Part Mount Size Newfs ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ad0a / 256MB UFS2 Y ad0b swap 484MB SWAP ad0d /var 256MB UFS2+S Y ad0e /tmp 256MB UFS2+S Y ad0f /usr 126GB UFS2+S Y If size of /usr partition is over than 126GB you'll see "ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA recovered from missing interrupt" message when doing newfs and system hangs. Is it Sun Netra X1 or FreeBSD-sparc64 128Gb disk size limit? Is it possible to fix this problem? From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 11:02:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BDC16A4CE for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:02:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7191243D93 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:01:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0JJ1XFR061925 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:01:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0JJ1Xvx061919 for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:01:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:01:33 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200401191901.i0JJ1Xvx061919@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:02:42 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/12/16] sparc64/60300sparc64 Constant kernel messages: calcru: negativ 1 problem total. Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/06/24] sparc64/53670sparc64 pthreads implementation on 5.1-Release sp 1 problem total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/02/03] sparc64/47845sparc64 4 second daily clock drift a [2003/10/10] sparc64/57856sparc64 sparc64: IDE Raid controller no detect di 2 problems total. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 01:00:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6EF16A4CE; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 01:00:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from phantom.cris.net (phantom.cris.net [212.110.130.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301C343D2F; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 01:00:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: from phantom.cris.net (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0L91Nem009742; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:01:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0L91Muj009737; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:01:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:01:21 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Bruce M Simpson Message-ID: <20040121090121.GC9372@FreeBSD.org.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R+My9LyyhiUvIEro" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: The sab(4) manpage X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:00:45 -0000 --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there! The sab(4) manpage is still there, in src/share/man/man4/, showing it's MD in the title. And it's actually MD, and belongs to the man4/man4.sparc64 if it should stay, as it cannot even be compiled on i386 (config(8) says "ebus" is an unknown device there). But I heard rumors that uart(4) will replace sab(4) on Sparc64 soon. Unless this is going to happen any time soon, I'm going to create src/share/man/man4/man4.sparc64 and order a repocopy. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFADj/hUkv4P6juNwoRAifTAJ4suS7El5YHOL6cZrpJjnyln4ahBACeOb+a vskVENgd6exxsQB4zWfgRyU= =O6Km -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 06:13:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F09A16A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 06:13:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.unsam.edu.ar (smtp.unsam.edu.ar [170.210.48.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1751A43D2F for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 06:13:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar) Received: from pi.iib.unsam.edu.ar (pi.iib.unsam.edu.ar [192.168.10.11]) by smtp.unsam.edu.ar (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0LE0iML049161 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:00:45 -0300 (ART) (envelope-from fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar) Received: from pi.iib.unsam.edu.ar (localhost.iib.unsam.edu.ar [127.0.0.1]) by pi.iib.unsam.edu.ar (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0LEBJ6L003164 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:11:19 -0300 (ART) (envelope-from fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar) Received: (from fernan@localhost) by pi.iib.unsam.edu.ar (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i0LEBIwM003163 for freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:11:18 -0300 (ART) (envelope-from fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar) X-Authentication-Warning: pi.iib.unsam.edu.ar: fernan set sender to fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar using -f Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:11:18 -0300 From: Fernan Aguero To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040121141118.GC2748@iib.unsam.edu.ar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: any chance of running FreeBSD on a Sun Ultra 1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:13:11 -0000 Hi! I am a FreeBSD user, but my experience is limited to i386 hardaware. Recently, our lab received an old Ultra 1 from Sun. It is currently running Solaris 8, but I'd like to investigate the possibility of running FreeBSD (or perhaps some other OS). It seems that the Ultra 1 is unsupported, but does that mean that it will not boot/run FreeBSD? Or just that no work is being done from the sparc@ project? If it's possible to netboot it, I can set up some shared NFS partitions on my i386 machine to hold what's necessary ... Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Fernan PS: BTW, is there such a thing as a 'Solaris binary compatibility' as there is for Linux in i386? I mean, may I be able to run Solaris sparc binaries on FreeBSD-sparc? -- F e r n a n A g u e r o http://genoma.unsam.edu.ar/~fernan From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 07:49:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AFF16A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 07:49:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from gldis.ca (constans.gldis.ca [66.11.169.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9FE43D31 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 07:49:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gldisater@gldis.ca) Received: from gldis.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gldis.ca (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0LFkBBc043849; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:46:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gldisater@gldis.ca) Message-ID: <400EA00C.7010900@gldis.ca> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:51:40 -0500 From: Jeremy Faulkner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040120 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fernan Aguero References: <20040121141118.GC2748@iib.unsam.edu.ar> In-Reply-To: <20040121141118.GC2748@iib.unsam.edu.ar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on constans.gldis.ca cc: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: any chance of running FreeBSD on a Sun Ultra 1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:49:18 -0000 Fernan Aguero wrote: > Hi! > > I am a FreeBSD user, but my experience is limited to i386 > hardaware. > > Recently, our lab received an old Ultra 1 from Sun. It is > currently running Solaris 8, but I'd like to investigate the > possibility of running FreeBSD (or perhaps some other OS). > > It seems that the Ultra 1 is unsupported, but does that mean > that it will not boot/run FreeBSD? Or just that no work is > being done from the sparc@ project? > > If it's possible to netboot it, I can set up some shared NFS > partitions on my i386 machine to hold what's necessary ... IIRC, the on board network and scsi cards are not supported (don't have functional drivers yet). > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks in advance, > > Fernan > > PS: BTW, is there such a thing as a 'Solaris binary > compatibility' as there is for Linux in i386? I mean, may I > be able to run Solaris sparc binaries on FreeBSD-sparc? > Not at this time. -- Jeremy Faulkner http://www.gldis.ca From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 19:42:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE3916A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF48243D45 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:42:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0M3gat3021262 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:42:37 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <200312212239.38557.craig@xfoil.gank.org> <20040106095942.O66232@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20040106182824.GA42422@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040107174346.GA50142@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040111093043.GA11120@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:42:35 -0500 To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: Gearing up for 64-bit time_t on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 03:42:39 -0000 At 3:41 AM -0500 1/12/04, I (Garance) wrote: > >http://people.freebsd.org/~gad/time-64/installworld_nk > >Is the magic script. Probably a little more elaborate than it >needs to be, but I had plenty of extra time while waiting for >'make buildworld' to finish... Fwiw, I just made to minor changes to this script, to make it a little more user-friendly. The option for "yes, go ahead and do the installworld" actually works now... I might poke at this script a little more this weekend, but I doubt I will have any significant changes. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 00:36:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BEA16A4CE for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:36:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de [193.174.154.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0B543D5A for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:36:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100])i0M8aOL02151; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:36:24 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:36:24 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt To: Jeremy Faulkner In-Reply-To: <400EA00C.7010900@gldis.ca> Message-ID: <20040122093437.V53499@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <20040121141118.GC2748@iib.unsam.edu.ar> <400EA00C.7010900@gldis.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Fernan Aguero cc: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: any chance of running FreeBSD on a Sun Ultra 1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 08:36:57 -0000 On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Jeremy Faulkner wrote: JF>Fernan Aguero wrote: JF>> Hi! JF>> JF>> I am a FreeBSD user, but my experience is limited to i386 JF>> hardaware. JF>> JF>> Recently, our lab received an old Ultra 1 from Sun. It is JF>> currently running Solaris 8, but I'd like to investigate the JF>> possibility of running FreeBSD (or perhaps some other OS). JF>> JF>> It seems that the Ultra 1 is unsupported, but does that mean JF>> that it will not boot/run FreeBSD? Or just that no work is JF>> being done from the sparc@ project? JF>> JF>> If it's possible to netboot it, I can set up some shared NFS JF>> partitions on my i386 machine to hold what's necessary ... JF> JF>IIRC, the on board network and scsi cards are not supported (don't have JF>functional drivers yet). It depends on whether this is an Ultra with a green or a red 1 on the front. The red one's network card are supported (the hme). I'm just trying to get mine to netboot. While it boots a couple of programs dump core (ls for example), but this may be just a pilot error. harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 03:15:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7613716A4CE for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 03:15:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from stanley.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de (stanley.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.137.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CE343D3F for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 03:15:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from meisel@lrs.eei.uni-erlangen.de) Received: from lrs.eei.uni-erlangen.de (kirk.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.137.140])MAA18728 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:15:47 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <400FB0E3.6000703@lrs.eei.uni-erlangen.de> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:15:47 +0100 From: Peter Meisel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020920 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: syscons on U10 /w Creator X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:15:52 -0000 > Ok, now that my kernel is built and installed, the machine won't boot. > I just get a solid white screen and that's all she wrote. Can ssh in > either. > Rich Hello Rich, I've the same problem. Did you find any solution? Please can you post me the solution - if you have. Thanks in advance Peter -- ____________________________________ Peter Meisel +49 9131 8523124 meisel@lrs.eei.uni-erlangen.de Paul-Gordan-Strasse 5 91052 Erlangen From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 06:04:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFF316A4CE for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:04:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574EA43D45 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:04:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 140745308; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:04:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 1CA55530C; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:04:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id F108F33C6A; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:04:03 +0100 (CET) To: Fernan Aguero References: <20040121141118.GC2748@iib.unsam.edu.ar> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:04:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20040121141118.GC2748@iib.unsam.edu.ar> (Fernan Aguero's message of "Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:11:18 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: ss X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61 cc: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: any chance of running FreeBSD on a Sun Ultra 1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:04:20 -0000 Fernan Aguero writes: > It seems that the Ultra 1 is unsupported, but does that mean > that it will not boot/run FreeBSD? Or just that no work is > being done from the sparc@ project? it means we don't have a driver for the on-board SCSI controller, so you can't boot FreeBSD from disk on an U1. > If it's possible to netboot it, I can set up some shared NFS > partitions on my i386 machine to hold what's necessary ... it should be possible to netboot it if it has an hme NIC. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 23 15:31:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66C116A506; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:31:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org (cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1236043D77; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:31:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0NNVgv9057354; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:31:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i0NNVgrp057353; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:31:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:31:42 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200401232331.i0NNVgrp057353@cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org> X-Authentication-Warning: cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org: des set sender to Tinderbox using -f Sender: Tinderbox From: Tinderbox To: current@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 23:31:59 -0000 TB --- 2004-01-23 23:31:42 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2004-01-23 23:31:42 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2004-01-23 23:31:42 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- /usr/local/bin/cvsup -1 -g -L 2 /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/supfile TB --- 2004-01-23 23:31:42 - Can't exec "/usr/local/bin/cvsup": No such file or directory at /home/des/bin/tinderbox line 199. TB --- 2004-01-23 23:31:42 - child: exec(): No such file or directory TB --- 2004-01-23 23:31:42 - tinderbox aborted TB --- 2004-01-23 23:31:42 - TB --- /usr/local/bin/cvsup returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-01-23 23:31:42 - TB --- ERROR: unable to cvsup the source tree TB --- 2004-01-23 23:31:42 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 23 15:39:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEA216A4CE; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:39:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org (cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0ACD43D86; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:38:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0NNcxv9057435; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:38:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i0NNcxl5057434; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:38:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:38:59 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200401232338.i0NNcxl5057434@cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org> X-Authentication-Warning: cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org: des set sender to Tinderbox using -f Sender: Tinderbox From: Tinderbox To: current@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 23:39:51 -0000 TB --- 2004-01-23 23:38:59 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2004-01-23 23:38:59 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2004-01-23 23:38:59 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- /home/des/bin/cvsup -1 -g -L 2 /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/supfile TB --- 2004-01-23 23:38:59 - TB --- /home/des/bin/cvsup returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-01-23 23:38:59 - TB --- ERROR: unable to cvsup the source tree TB --- 2004-01-23 23:38:59 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 23 17:51:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5197616A4CE for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:51:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9B143D97 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:50:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0O1oGFR086707 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:50:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0O1oGnM086705; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:50:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:50:16 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200401240150.i0O1oGnM086705@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org From: Mark Rutherford Subject: Re: sparc64/60300: Constant kernel messages: calcru: negative time of -962594 usec for pid 7622 (ls) X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Rutherford List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:51:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR sparc64/60300; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Rutherford To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, freebsd@stenstad.net Cc: Subject: Re: sparc64/60300: Constant kernel messages: calcru: negative time of -962594 usec for pid 7622 (ls) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:43:56 -0500 I installed FreeBSD 5.2 -RELEASE on an old celeron with a small disk. observed the same behavior as this report. the machine will lock up at random, ect. i do not have a serial cable to provide more info via a serial port. I can provide any info about this as needed to fix it, tho I hope this is of some help. the output of dmesg: Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE #0: Sun Jan 11 04:21:45 GMT 2004 root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0a33000. Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc0a331f4. Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (333.37-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x665 Stepping = 5 Features=0x183f9ff real memory = 260034560 (247 MB) avail memory = 242946048 (231 MB) Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 Using $PIR table, 7 entries at 0xc00f0ac0 acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0xec08-0xec0b on acpi0 acpi_cpu0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib0: slot 1 INTA is routed to irq 11 pcib0: slot 3 INTA is routed to irq 10 pcib0: slot 6 INTA is routed to irq 15 agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xe3ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 atapci0: port 0xd000-0xd00f,0xd400-0xd403,0xd800-0xd807,0xe000-0xe003,0xe400-0xe407 irq 14 at device 0.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata0: [MPSAFE] ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ata1: [MPSAFE] isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xdf800000-0xdf800fff irq 11 at device 1.2 on pci0 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib0: slot 2 INTA is routed to irq 11 pcib1: slot 0 INTA is routed to irq 11 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) fxp0: port 0xa800-0xa83f mem 0xde000000-0xde0fffff,0xde800000-0xde800fff irq 10 at device 3.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:e0:18:01:65:06 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto pci0: at device 6.0 (no driver attached) fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f2-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 ppc0 port 0x778-0x77f,0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 sio0 port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 orm0: