From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 12 00:07:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E0416A4CE for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 00:07:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1D343D2D for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 00:07:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (12-216-240-169.client.mchsi.com[12.216.240.169]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with ESMTP id <20040912000702m9100fvnt2e>; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 00:07:02 +0000 Message-ID: <4143931B.5080104@math.missouri.edu> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:06:51 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040903 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 2 Processors under FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 00:07:03 -0000 I have a dual Athlon MP computer, and I have a very recent version of FreeBSD 5.3 running on it. If I start 6 computer intensive processes, and then kill 3 of them that are using (say) processor 1, then the other 3 processes are all processor 0, and as such only get 33% computer time each. Under FreeBSD 4.10 they would have got 66% computer time each, because there each process didn't seem stuck to a particular processor. Is there a sysctl variable that controls this, or is this a bug in FreeBSD 5.3, or what is going on? Here is the computer intensive process: main() { int i; while(1) {i++;} } From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 12 09:10:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9B816A4CE for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:10:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF55F43D49 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:10:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.16.62]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C6QNk-0007ln-GY; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 10:10:49 +0100 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C6QNg-00065J-Pe; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 10:10:45 +0100 Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 10:10:44 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: Dan Swartzendruber In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040910143012.021fd068@127.0.0.1> Message-ID: References: <413BC4CD.5090201@hamla.org> <200409061239.36859.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <6.1.2.0.2.20040910143012.021fd068@127.0.0.1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Jan Grant X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Level: / cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: Erwan David Subject: Re: Re: portsdb -Uu results in coredump X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:10:57 -0000 On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > At 02:43 AM 9/9/2004, Erwan David wrote: > > Le Mon 6/09/2004, Daniel O'Connor disait > > > On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 11:30, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > > > After a cvsup yesterday, I get this after trying to portsdb -Uu: > > > > > > > > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.. Done. > > > > done > > > > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11736 port > > > > entries found > > > > > > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6 > > > >000.........7000.........8000..../usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/port > > sdb.r > > > >b:587: [BUG] Bus Error > > > > ruby 1.8.2 (2004-07-29) [i386-freebsd4] > > > > > > > > I tried removing the ports directory and rebuilding (cvsup'ing) > > > > entirely, but the error remains. What's the problem? > > > > > > You need to upgrade ruby18.. > > > > > > Try > > > pkg_delete -f ruby-1.8\* > > > cd /usr/ports/lang/ruby18 > > > make install > > > > I got same problem with an up to date ruby 1.8 > > > > a make fetchindex in /usr/ports solved the problem. > > it didn't for me, unfortunately :( > > > -su-2.05b# pwd > /usr/ports > -su-2.05b# make fetchindex > Receiving INDEX-5 (5873261 bytes): 100% (ETA 00:00) > 5873261 bytes transferred in 133.9 seconds (42.83 kBps) > -su-2.05b# sync > -su-2.05b# portsdb -Uu > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..Warning: > Duplicate INDEX entry: mod_jk2-apache2-2.0.2 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mod_rpaf-ap2-0.5 > Done. > done > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11734 port > entries found > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000..../usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:587: > [BUG] Bus Error > ruby 1.8.2 (2004-07-29) [i386-freebsd5] > > Abort trap (core dumped) Solutions (well, workarounds) to this exist. For example, add this line to /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf: ENV['PORTS_DBDRIVER'] ||= 'bdb1_hash' and the bug isn't tickled. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Axioms speak louder than words. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 12 17:57:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1198016A4CE for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:57:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C35943D5A for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:57:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sahil@hamla.org) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (ool-182e70a4.dyn.optonline.net [24.46.112.164]) by mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I3X00CZ6WH3TF@mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 13:55:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 13:55:44 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon In-reply-to: To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <41448DA0.4000601@hamla.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) References: <413BC4CD.5090201@hamla.org> <200409061239.36859.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <6.1.2.0.2.20040910143012.021fd068@127.0.0.1> cc: Erwan David cc: Dan Swartzendruber Subject: Re: portsdb -Uu results in coredump X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:57:35 -0000 Jan Grant wrote: >>-su-2.05b# make fetchindex >>Receiving INDEX-5 (5873261 bytes): 100% (ETA 00:00) >>5873261 bytes transferred in 133.9 seconds (42.83 kBps) >>-su-2.05b# sync >>-su-2.05b# portsdb -Uu When you fetch the INDEX manually, don't specify -U with portsdb; -u will suffice. 'man portsdb' for more info. -- Sahil From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 13 00:37:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F31916A4CE for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:37:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from infocomp.com (201008083035.user.veloxzone.com.br [201.8.83.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 444E943D45 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:37:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vfxdjrauiy@infocomp.com) From: Lacresha Winkler To: Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 18:38:00 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: plain Message-Id: <20040913003704.444E943D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Winkler VCSC Going Crazy, Huge News! muhrhk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: vfxdjrauiy@infocomp.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:37:07 -0000 Lacresha Introducing Vocalscape, Inc. GET IN VCSC NOW! HUGE NEWS FOR VCSC this issue will explode on Monday and Tuesday- A big PR campaign underway for the weekend and all next week so huge gains are expected all this week coming up so get it as soon as possible. Watch out for it . Jump on board before.. Just like you did with EMTK MicroCap Marketing PLAY OF THE WEEK for our investors is Vocalscape, Inc. VCSC If you tuned in lastMonday you would have seen our last week PLAY OF THE WEEK, EMTK go from Fridays's close of 10cents to a high of .95 on Thursday. That's a 800% gain in just three days. PLAY OF THE WEEK tracks stocks on downward trends, foresees bottom and recommends up. VCSC is our next profile speculative target price in 1-2 days: $0.74 - 0.89 speculative target price in 10 days : $1.29 Vocalscape, Inc. is an emerging developer of interactive communication software. The Company has created software and interactive solutions revolving around global communications and Data Voice Convergence. Vocalscape focuses on adding to customer's website and customer support centers by integrating website solutions that enable real human assistance, live interaction services such as instant messaging, voice over the Internet (VoIP) and interactive desktop solutions sharing solutions. As previously announced on August 20, 2004 Vocalscape has executed a Letter of Intent to Acquire 100% of NTELX, Inc. Vocalscape is an emerging developer of next generation Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) products. The company has created software and interactive solutions revolving around global communications and DATA & VOICE convergence. Our strategy is to focus on VoIP communication solutions that bring a full range of communications software, and services togethe r to solve business problems and add value to our customers. According to Infonetics Research's quarterly market share and forecast service, Next Gen Voice Products, worldwide next generation voice product revenue totaled 389m in 2Q 2004, up 10 percent from 1Q 2004 and up 21 percent year-over-year. Annual revenue is projected to grow from $1.3b in 2003 to $4.8b in 2007. expected target price in 1-2 days: $0.74 - 0.89 expected target price in 10 days : $1.29 Don't waste time get VCSC.PK....Now and Profit from it. -------------------------------------------------------------- Information within this email contains forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. This newsletter was paid $11300 from third party to send this report. lnwhal irhujy ygxbri oudxpk thufvt xfqiaa lyuliu aewqbc sowovt tpotxf From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 13 07:12:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A1D16A4CE for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 07:12:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ha-smtp0.tiscali.nl (smtp-b2c.tiscali.nl [195.241.80.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976F943D45 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 07:12:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rickvanderzwet@tiscali.nl) Received: from [IPv6???1] (212-123-169-123-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl [212.123.169.123]) by ha-smtp0.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B49980F0A for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:12:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <41456463.8090305@tiscali.nl> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:12:03 +0000 From: Rick van der Zwet User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040821) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Patch: Added support for Sitecom USB to serial cable(v2) (Freebsd 5.2.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 07:12:32 -0000 Hi, Add support for Sitecom USB to serial cable(v2) /home/rick% dmesg | grep ucom ucom0: Sitecom USB to serial cable(v2), rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2 Works like a charm. Don't know how to upload to freebsd-5.2.1 source. Greetings, Rick /home/rick% diff /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs /tmp/usbdevs.old 455c455 < vendor SITECOM 0x6189 Sitecom --- > 1285,1287d1284 < < /* Sitecom */ < product SITECOM SERIAL 0x2068 USB to serial cable(v2) /home/rick% diff /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/uplcom.c /tmp/uplcom.c.old 223d222 < { USB_VENDOR_SITECOM, USB_PRODUCT_SITECOM_SERIAL }, From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 13 15:30:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA85B16A4D0 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:30:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from raven.kierun.org (raven.yorksj.ac.uk [193.61.234.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8796B43D48 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:30:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yann@raven.kierun.org) Received: from yann by raven.kierun.org with local (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1C6srl-000BHT-0t; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:35:41 +0100 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:35:40 +0100 From: Yann Golanski To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040913153540.GA22877@kierun.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: "Yann Golanski,University of York,+44(0)1904-433088" cc: Akinori MUSHA aka knu Subject: Crash of portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:30:40 -0000 I'm getting the following crash: [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11732 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000..../usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:587: [BUG] Bus Error ruby 1.8.2 (2004-07-29) [i386-freebsd5] Abort trap (core dumped) Does anyone else get this? Machine is: FreeBSD gridlinked.neverness.org 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Feb 23 20:45:55 GMT 2004 root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 With portupgrade-20040701_3 ruby-1.8.2.p2_1 ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 -- yann@kierun.org -=*=- www.kierun.org PGP: 009D 7287 C4A7 FD4F 1680 06E4 F751 7006 9DE2 6318 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 13 16:01:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE7316A4CE for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:01:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D9F43D1D for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:01:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i8DG1B3G083638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:01:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8DG1BOe083637; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:01:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:01:11 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Yann Golanski Message-ID: <20040913160111.GA83205@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20040913153540.GA22877@kierun.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040913153540.GA22877@kierun.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:01:11 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Crash of portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:01:19 -0000 --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 04:35:40PM +0100, Yann Golanski wrote: > I'm getting the following crash: >=20 > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11732 port > entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.......= ..5000.........6000.........7000.........8000..../usr/local/lib/ruby/site_r= uby/1.8/portsdb.rb:587: [BUG] Bus Error ruby 1.8.2 (2004-07-29) [i386-freeb= sd5] > Abort trap (core dumped) > Does anyone else get this? =20 You and about 10,000 other people. It's been done to death on freebsd-ports@... freebsd-questions@..., freebsd-current@..., and probably a few other mailing lists as well. The problem is a bug in the underlying BDB v1 btree implementation. Jun Kuriyama posted a couple of patched for people to try out onto freebsd-current@... -- this is the most recent one, which might even work: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-September/037222= .html Porting that to 4-STABLE is left as an exercise. Should be fairly easy, as the code in question hasn't been modified for 5.x (as far as I know). Otherwise, there's a nice simple low impact workaround: # setenv PORTS_DBDRIVER bdb1_hash There are some other workarounds and some variations on this workaround but you can find those for yourself by searching the various FreeBSD mailing list archives Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBRcRHiD657aJF7eIRAr1JAJ9TX6+2t2gqQMN/Mj0cgFk/xwZLTwCePB2H +FAdp6xkeo9k8cD9yKmKnZU= =Dwg0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 13 16:49:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F8316A4CE for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:49:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.druber.com (dsl-216-129-135-2.lightband.com [216.129.135.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E7C43D2F for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:49:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dswartz@druber.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.druber.com [127.0.0.1]) by sphinx.druber.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC04420F8; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:49:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sphinx.druber.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sphinx.druber.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 72437-03-2; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:49:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from swartz.druber.com (localhost.druber.com [127.0.0.1]) by sphinx.druber.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE0120A4; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:49:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040913124854.02201568@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: dswartz@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:49:14 -0400 To: Matthew Seaman , Yann Golanski From: Dan Swartzendruber In-Reply-To: <20040913160111.GA83205@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.c o.uk> References: <20040913153540.GA22877@kierun.org> <20040913160111.GA83205@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at druber.com cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Crash of portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:49:18 -0000 I've been using the portsindex portsindexdb method with success... From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 14 00:33:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CE216A4CE for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:33:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D15343D39 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:33:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from unix4all@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 75so145762rnk for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.67.22 with SMTP id p22mr547945rna; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.88.18 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2cadd226040913173375f05a9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 01:33:05 +0100 From: "Jacobo Arvelo \"UNIX4ALL\"" To: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040913124854.02201568@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040913153540.GA22877@kierun.org> <20040913160111.GA83205@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <6.1.2.0.2.20040913124854.02201568@127.0.0.1> Subject: Re: Crash of portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Jacobo Arvelo \"UNIX4ALL\"" List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:33:07 -0000 Is there any chance to merge this patch to RELENG_5 ? On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:49:14 -0400, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > > I've been using the > > portsindex > portsindexdb > > method with success... > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Jacobo Arvelo "UNIX4ALL" Free/Open/Net/DragonFly BSD Powered User http://www.corralito.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 14 00:51:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2427816A4CE for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:51:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from raadradd.homeunix.org (bwf135.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.29.229.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D4F43D5C for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:51:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from radek@raadradd.com) Received: by raadradd.homeunix.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 11B06A568; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 02:51:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 02:51:24 +0200 From: Radek Kozlowski To: Jacobo Arvelo UNIX4ALL Message-ID: <20040914005124.GB12665@werd> References: <20040913153540.GA22877@kierun.org> <20040913160111.GA83205@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <6.1.2.0.2.20040913124854.02201568@127.0.0.1> <2cadd226040913173375f05a9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cadd226040913173375f05a9@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Crash of portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:51:28 -0000 On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 01:33:05AM +0100, Jacobo Arvelo UNIX4ALL wrote: > Is there any chance to merge this patch to RELENG_5 ? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-September/037277.html -Radek From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 14 01:32:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2F016A4CE; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 01:32:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk2.snu.ac.kr (auk2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D4743D45; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 01:32:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (spamrefuse@yahoo.com) by auk2.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004091410:32:13:901253.29654.2333649840 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:32:13 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <41464A25.1020706@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:32:21 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040901 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: YES-__TRSYS_LV__3 (SR:-2.93) (SRN:SPAMROBOT) ----------------- Subject: 5.3-BETA3: "man pcm" has wrong information X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 01:32:23 -0000 Hi, Do following remarks belong to stable or current (or elsewhere) ? This is for 5.3-BETA3. When I do 'man pcm', it tells me to use device pcm in the kernel configuration file, but for 5.3 this is incorrect. It should be 'device sound' with the additional sound device module. Is the pcm manpage forgotten to be updated for 5.3 ? Regards, Rob. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 14 03:14:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683F616A4CE; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:14:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mesozoic.gatenby.org (mesozoic.gatenby.org [65.19.178.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FE843D53; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:14:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@gatenby.org) Received: from mesozoic.gatenby.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8E3E7NO010461 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:14:07 -0400 Received: (from www-data@localhost) by mesozoic.gatenby.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i8E3E7mf010460; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:14:07 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: mesozoic.gatenby.org: www-data set sender to eric@gatenby.org using -f Received: from itsb149.itsnpt.com (itsb149.itsnpt.com [208.48.228.149]) by webmail.gatenby.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:14:06 -0400 Message-ID: <1095131646.414661fef24e5@webmail.gatenby.org> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:14:06 -0400 From: Eric Gatenby To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 208.48.228.149 Subject: ATA/SATA lockups X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:14:08 -0000 Hi, I'm been having a strange problem with various builds of FreeBSD - 5.2-RELEASE (at least) and up to 5.3-BETA4. Random hard lockups are occuring when writing to two separate SATA drives. Sometimes the lockups occur under high IO, but not always. Due to the random nature of the lockups, I don't have much hard evidence and information to provide. How can I go about gathering more information? I've tried enabling WITNESS and other kernel debugging options, but no extra debugging data was produced. The drives aren't configured as RAID -- they are accessed separately and not configured in any special way. They are two 160G Seagate SATA (ST3160023AS) drives that are being accessed via their ar* devices. I've also tried accessing them directly via their ad* devices, but the lockups still occured. smartmontools report the drives as good on both long and short tests. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks! ------------------------------------------------------------------- dmesg output: Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.3-BETA4 #0: Sat Sep 11 13:12:26 EDT 2004 root@triassic.gatenby.org:/build/obj/build/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.53GHz (2539.10-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf27 Stepping = 7 Features=0xbfebfbff real memory = 1073659904 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1041092608 (992 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Overriding SCI Interrupt from IRQ 9 to IRQ 22 acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0xe408-0xe40b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 atapci0: port 0xa000-0xa07f,0xa400-0xa40f,0xa800-0xa83f mem 0xdd800000-0xdd81ffff,0xde000000-0xde000fff irq 23 at device 4.0 on pci2 atapci0: failed: rid 0x20 is memory, requested 4 ata2: channel #0 on atapci0 ata3: channel #1 on atapci0 ata4: channel #2 on atapci0 bge0: mem 0xdd000000-0xdd00ffff irq 20 at device 5.0 on pci2 miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:18:fe:24:8b isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci1: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 18 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci1 ata1: channel #1 on atapci1 fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f2-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcffff on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 8250 or not responding sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2539104508 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec acpi_cpu: throttling enabled, 8 steps (100% to 12.5%), currently 100.0% ad0: 117246MB [238216/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 ad4: 152627MB [310101/16/63] at ata2-master SATA150 ad6: 152627MB [310101/16/63] at ata3-master SATA150 ar0: 152627MB [19457/255/63] status: READY subdisks: disk0 READY on ad4 at ata2-master ar1: 152627MB [19457/255/63] status: READY subdisks: disk0 READY on ad6 at ata3-master Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a Accounting enabled ------------------------------------------------------------------- fdisk output for the first drive. second drive is exactly the same: ******* Working on device /dev/ar0 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=19457 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=19457 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 312576642 (152625 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 The data for partition 2 is: The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: ------------------------------------------------------------------- smartctl output: === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Device Model: ST3160023AS Serial Number: 3JS325HD Firmware Version: 3.18 Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] ATA Version is: 6 ATA Standard is: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 2 Local Time is: Mon Sep 13 23:07:54 2004 EDT SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled -- Eric Gatenby - eric@gatenby.org - AIM: egatenby http://eric.gatenby.org/ Doubt of the reality of love ends by making us doubt everything. -- Henri-Frédéric Amiel From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 14 14:58:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EC316A4CE; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:58:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zardoz.rd.imagescape.com (zardoz.rd.imagescape.com [66.100.151.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7684343D48; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:58:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from puna@imagescape.com) Received: from [192.168.0.59] (nikko.rd.imagescape.com [192.168.0.59]) (authenticated bits=0)i8EEw2U5024037; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:58:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from puna@imagescape.com) Message-ID: <414707C5.3010803@imagescape.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:01:25 -0500 From: Puna Tannehill User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on zardoz.rd.imagescape.com Subject: kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded, error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:58:05 -0000 On a freshly rebuild v5.3-BETA4... A failed compile of sysutils/fastest_cvsup led me to run 'make clean' before trying again. It took over 5 minutes to run make clean, and at the very end I got the following: # make clean kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded; see tuning(7) Pipe call failed: Too many open files in system Pipe call failed: Too many open files in system ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.5.8 ===> Cleaning for perl-5.8.5 ===> Cleaning for fastest_cvsup-0.2.8 There is nothing specifically in tuning about this particular knob, but from poking around I get the feeling that it's about memory management of the kernel IPC subsystem. Running 'sysctl kern.ipc.maxpipekva' shows: kern.ipc.maxpipekva=1257472 Hunting around on in the archives, I came up with people getting this error while doing very intensive compiles. Seems strange to me that I might get such an error on a 15min uptime, cold-booted machine and just doing a 'make clean'. And thoughts? Puna From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 14 18:16:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA01C16A4CE; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:16:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [198.128.3.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD0343D39; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:16:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 1) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:16:35 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 3BB1A5D09; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:16:35 -0700 (PDT) To: Rob In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:32:21 +0900." <41464A25.1020706@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:16:35 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20040914181635.3BB1A5D09@ptavv.es.net> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-BETA3: "man pcm" has wrong information X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:16:36 -0000 > Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:32:21 +0900 > From: Rob > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > > Hi, > > Do following remarks belong to stable or current (or elsewhere) ? > > This is for 5.3-BETA3. When I do 'man pcm', it tells me to use > > device pcm > > in the kernel configuration file, but for 5.3 this is incorrect. > It should be 'device sound' with the additional sound device > module. > > Is the pcm manpage forgotten to be updated for 5.3 ? It was updated in head about a week ago. I hope it will MT5 shortly. Ruslan, in consultation with cg, did a major re-work of the sound pages. You can get the latest and greatest from CVS for HEAD. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/share/man/man4/ -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 14 19:07:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8220F16A4CE; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:07:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D8643D49; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:07:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (oak.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8EJ7SYF025890; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:07:28 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 86952-06; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:07:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8EJ7RkP025889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:07:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) id i8EJ7RaN021753; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:07:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:07:27 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Kevin Oberman Message-ID: <20040914190727.GA21669@ip.net.ua> References: <41464A25.1020706@yahoo.com> <20040914181635.3BB1A5D09@ptavv.es.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040914181635.3BB1A5D09@ptavv.es.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua cc: Rob cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-BETA3: "man pcm" has wrong information X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:07:34 -0000 --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 11:16:35AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:32:21 +0900 > > From: Rob > > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > >=20 > >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > Do following remarks belong to stable or current (or elsewhere) ? > >=20 > > This is for 5.3-BETA3. When I do 'man pcm', it tells me to use > >=20 > > device pcm > >=20 > > in the kernel configuration file, but for 5.3 this is incorrect. > > It should be 'device sound' with the additional sound device > > module. > >=20 > > Is the pcm manpage forgotten to be updated for 5.3 ? >=20 > It was updated in head about a week ago. I hope it will MT5 shortly. > Ruslan, in consultation with cg, did a major re-work of the sound > pages. You can get the latest and greatest from CVS for HEAD. > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/share/man/man4/ >=20 "Major" is overestimated here -- just some small tweaks to the current text to adopt to reality. The Handbook's sound chapter has also been updated. For one, the SYNOPSIS of the sound(4) manpage is lying about that you need only "device sound" to get you sound -- you also need "device snd_". Once the sound-related renaming is done (there are further plans to do some more renames for better consistency in naming), the sound(4) manpage will be replaced by the snd(4) manpage (yeah, welcome back, old good "snd"). Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBR0FvqRfpzJluFF4RAifrAJ9jybm2JYzhnJUjrx5kFkhZ9p0DLACgij30 yNqAe9dnYk/RQ+to1FgIm/4= =XWn5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 01:44:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D324C16A4CE for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 01:44:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.faerunconsulting.com (vadsl-pppoe-jcnj-cst-216-182-31-61.tellurian.net [216.182.31.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D99AE43D45 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 01:44:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@carrollkong.com) Received: (qmail 79035 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2004 03:57:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO athena) (192.168.0.2) by dmz.faerunhome.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2004 03:57:26 -0000 Message-ID: <202801c49a0e$f2ca9980$0200a8c0@athena> From: "Carroll Kong" To: "Anton Ivanov" , References: <40CD80F1.6020107@mintel.com> <41402CA2.90801@mintel.com> <1bfe01c496b8$f957b480$0200a8c0@athena> <200409131700.53789.ai1@ipaccess.com> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:57:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4942.400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4942.400 cc: Jason Thomson Subject: Re: 3ware 7506, FreeBSD 4.x, Maxtor Disks & SMART Problems. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 01:44:09 -0000 Actually, I was using smartmontools improperly in my tests. It isn't enough to hope to catch a smartd error. It is better to run the long tests with smartctl (forget about smartd) and shut most of the box's I/O down to ensure it completes within an hour or two. I wasn't sure how it worked, until I tried it on a local test host. One of the maxtor disks at the colocation with the 3ware card was failing to complete it's long tests with read errors. This is inline with Jason's postings about how maxtor disk errors can cause a total I/O hang. Note, this is the start of a disk failure, not a total disk failure. Mike's errors occured in a RAID5 DEGRADED mode system with Western Digital disks. I can only assume the 3Ware problem with handling failed IDE disks extends itself in DEGRADED mode as well as NORMAL mode (but with Maxtor disks). I strongly suggest 3ware users check their automated monitoring tools and do periodic smartctl disk checks to verify a disk's health. It is important to remove an ailing disk before a total failure since it can cause a total system hang. The bus issues do not affect us at all, or they should not I have a freak of nature 7450 card which is a 64bit/33 mhz card and no longer available. The issue only affects 66 mhz and riser card users. The bus issues were noted and documented in 3ware's advisories. Depending on when you purchased your card and if it is running at 66 mhz or not. http://www.3ware.com/KB/kb.asp https://www.3ware.com/kbadmin/attachments/TM900-0045-00%20Rev%20A_P.pdf General idea is the older runs of the 3ware card does not handle high speed timings well which was a big problem with riser cards + 66 mhz combinations. You can purchase a special riser card from www.adexelec.com PCITX8-3R This riser card was specially designed by Adex to help resolve 3ware's known issue. Any new 3ware cards should not experience this issue. Unfortunately, this issue is not the same as mine, but I hope this information helps you. (consider purchasing the special PCI riser card with additional resistors). - Carroll Kong ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anton Ivanov" To: Cc: "Carroll Kong" ; "Jason Thomson" Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 12:00 PM Subject: Re: 3ware 7506, FreeBSD 4.x, Maxtor Disks & SMART Problems. > Hi Carrol, > > Pass this to the list as for some reason it times out my posts to > it. > > We had similar issues with 3ware on riser cards. 8506-8 different > board designs will either hang or not even boot on riser cards > that are not grounded correctly (see if the holes on the edges of > the riser cards are connected to the chassis). It never got past a > 30G transfer. > > After grounding the failures became less common dropping to a hang > after 300-500G or so. > > Without riser cards it does not fail. > > Dropping the bus to 33 (8506-8 a 66 card) also makes it behave (so > far). > > Basically, it is the most fussy adapter I have seen so far in terms > of bus noise requirements (we have observed the failures under all > OSes we use so it is not an OS issue). > > Brgds, > > A. > > On Thursday 09 September 2004 23:04, Carroll Kong wrote: > > Well, I tried your command first to see if we could > > get a quick "test". It ran for about 30 mins, I re-ran it on > > another partition, and I even ran another instance of it on yet > > another partition. It kept going. > > > > Then we ran some very file intensive (updates hundreds of files > > in a lot of different directories) and it seemed to stall my > > writes to the /var partition, which in turn broke one of my > > instances of dnscache, which then snowballed until doing tail > > /var/log/messages would hang the zsh completely. > > > > I am thinking it "might" be because we have not done array > > integrity checks yet because our firmware is so old and the old > > 3dm does not support it. > > > > Throughout the entire time, smartd was runing and reported two > > more errors on one of the disks, but nothing major. I am not > > 100% sure if there was as correlation between those errors and > > the ultimate meltdown > > > > I retested this again, I was able to get it to hang again. I am > > beginning to wonder if the other things I use could play a role > > in this. > > > > - using vnode backed disks/partitions > > - using jails > > - using a pci riser card (my 7450 is 64bit/33mhz, the problem > > does not apply to me) > > however, there is a slight chance that maybe my riser card isn't > > seated as well? Really trying to grasp at straws here. > > > > I tried truss on the "file intense" activity, all it showed was > > after a certain time it hung at a stat call. Basically all I/O > > just halted magically. > > > > SmartD did not show any error increases when the problem > > occurred. Maybe it's not my maxtors then. > > > > > > > > - Carroll Kong > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jason Thomson" > > To: "Carroll Kong" > > Cc: > > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 6:12 AM > > Subject: Re: 3ware 7506, FreeBSD 4.x, Maxtor Disks & SMART > > Problems. > > > > > Hi Carroll, > > > > > > I posted the original problem report you referred to earlier. > > > > > > 3ware are looking into the problem. It looks like it's a > > > problem with 3ware's firmware (perhaps related to some anomaly > > > in the way that Maxtor disks behave). > > > > > > It would appear that it's only a problem when the disk has > > > errors. > > > > > > On one machine, I can reproduce this problem by dd'ing from > > > the RAID5 array: > > > > > > dd if=/dev/twed0s1h iseek=137510 bs=1m of=/dev/null > > > > > > On that machine I have the lockup will *always* be preceded by > > > the following message on the console: > > > > > > twe0: AEN: > > > > > > Do you have any error messages on the console? > > > > > > > > > I think that the disk I have on port 3 is flakey. I could > > > replace the disk, but I'm waiting until 3ware get back to me > > > / issue a fix so I can have some reasonable idea that the > > > problem is fixed. > > > > > > 3ware *have* been looking into this problem, and I think have > > > established that it's a firmware rather than a driver issue > > > (it occurs with other OSes as well apparently). I don't know > > > how close they are to being able to fix this. > > > > > > We buy all our new machines with Western Digital disks (and > > > 3ware controllers). No problems yet (and we have about 10 of > > > them - more than we have with Maxtor disks). > > > > > > (BTW I have established over a period of months that this > > > problems existed with various versions of the driver and > > > firmware dating back to 2003. It still exists with the latest > > > FBSD driver and 3ware firmware: FE7X 1.05.00.068) > > > > > > Carroll Kong wrote: > > > > I tried using the SmartD 5.33 (CVS). It appeared to work, > > > > but did not > > > > pick > > > > > > up anything in the next crash. I noticed some temperature > > > > changes, and > > > > I > > > > > > plan on running some difference tests, but nothing out of > > > > the ordinary. > > > > > > > > This time the crash hung a lot of httpds and got them stuck > > > > into the D state. We had something like this happen before > > > > ... but now that I > > > > think > > > > > > about it, it matches the experience of Jason almost > > > > perfectly. > > > > > > > > Upon lockup, sometimes we still have partial control of the > > > > system. The processes waiting on the 3ware card cannot be > > > > killed. The web sites > > > > that > > > > > > are still in cache are servable. > > > > > > > > It occurred when a big I/O request was going through (along > > > > with the > > > > normal > > > > > > web traffic). The odd thing is, it's not a function of raw > > > > I/O, since > > > > our > > > > > > definition of big I/O was simply 3-4MB/sec according to > > > > iostat. It > > > > seems > > > > > > over time it just... well it just goes kaput if you push it > > > > a bit hard > > > > after > > > > > > a long days run of non-stop I/Os. > > > > > > > > The initial fsck we do runs at 17MB/sec at far more > > > > transactions per > > > > second. > > > > > > Anyway, I am convinced the problem is somehow related to the > > > > 3ware > > > > system > > > > > > (either the disks, the controller or something). Originally > > > > I was > > > > looking > > > > > > at other possibilities, but seeing people's experiences > > > > here, and a colleague of mine's experience, something fishy > > > > is going on. > > > > > > > > I am leaning towards a full hdd swap, seems like I will have > > > > to replace > > > > one > > > > > > disk at a time and let it rebuild slowly to eventually swap > > > > out all the disks. I am able to get this problem to occur > > > > faster and faster now, unfortunately it is a production box > > > > and we would much rather it not. > > > > And I > > > > > > am going to switch off to Seagate instead of Maxtor. > > > > Despite using 3ware+maxtor on other machines here, (but they > > > > have considerably less > > > > load), > > > > > > it's just too much of a coincidence that 3 different people > > > > including > > > > myself > > > > > > have had problems with 3ware+maxtor whereas you can easily > > > > find that > > > > many > > > > > > and more that have it working fine with another vendor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Carroll Kong > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Carroll Kong" > > > > To: "Jason Thomson" ; > > > > Cc: ; > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, > > > > 2004 3:24 PM > > > > Subject: Re: 3ware 7506, FreeBSD 4.x, Maxtor Disks & SMART > > > > Problems. > > > > > > > >>Hi, in reference to this > > > >>http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2004-June/ > > > >>007828.html > > > >> > > > >>I have a FreeBSD 4.10-p2 system, using a 7450 with 4xMAXTOR > > > >> 6L080J4 (80 gig) disks. > > > >> > > > >>Raid 5 setup. > > > >> > > > >> Monitor version: ME7X 1.01.00.035 > > > >> Firmware version: FE7X 1.05.00.036 > > > >> BIOS version: BE7X 1.08.00.044 > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>(Firmware 7.5.3 basically). > > > >> > > > >>I am also having the same problems you are having. Randomly > > > >> under heavy > > > > > > > > I/O > > > > > > > >>the system will just halt I/O requests. No error messages > > > >> on the > > > > console, > > > > > >>it would just start to hang and halt completely. (no kernel > > > >> panics at > > > > > > > > all). > > > > > > > >>I believe I have the same problem you do. Were you able to > > > >> resolve the issue or narrow it down? The machine is not > > > >> local, but I am curious if > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > >>did resolve it, what version of FreeBSD did you have? What > > > >> firmware? > > > > And > > > > > >>did you have to do the powermax testing on all the disks or > > > >> not? > > > >> > > > >>I cannot easily do the powermax testing yet, and my firmware > > > >> is older > > > > and > > > > > > I > > > > > > > >>am still running into this problem (which should have all > > > >> the twe driver fixes). > > > >> > > > >>I tried using "Smartmontools" to verify if the Maxtor disks > > > >> are okay > > > > since > > > > > >>they only work for Linux + 3Ware. > > > >> > > > >>Thanks in advance! > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>- Carroll Kong > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>_______________________________________________ > > > >>freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > > >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > > >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 02:43:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75C816A4CE; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 02:43:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mgr2.xmission.com (mgr2.xmission.com [198.60.22.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77AE43D3F; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 02:43:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leporter@xmission.com) Received: from [198.60.22.201] (helo=mgr1.xmission.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1C7PlI-0004l8-02; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:43:12 -0600 Received: from [166.70.25.145] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by mgr1.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C7PlI-00068k-Q8; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:43:12 -0600 Message-ID: <4147AC40.80507@xmission.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:43:12 -0600 From: Jason Porter User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040908) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mgr1.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.25.145 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: leporter@xmission.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:31:30 +0200) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mgr1.xmission.com) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Spinlock problem in 5.3-Beta X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 02:43:13 -0000 I cvsuped last week, on 9 Sept and since then I've installed XMMS and mplayer from the ports and neither one of them work, here are the errors I receive when I try to start them: XMMS: Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 83 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0) Segmentation fault (core dumped) mplayer: Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 83 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0) Abort trap (core dumped) I'm not sure if this is a new feature in 5 or a debugging problem or what. Does anyone have any help they can offer? -Jason Porter From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 06:43:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 20BB116A4CF; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:43:40 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:43:40 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jason Porter Message-ID: <20040915064340.GC63279@hub.freebsd.org> References: <4147AC40.80507@xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4147AC40.80507@xmission.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spinlock problem in 5.3-Beta X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:43:40 -0000 On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:43:12PM -0600, Jason Porter wrote: > I cvsuped last week, on 9 Sept and since then I've installed XMMS and > mplayer from the ports and neither one of them work, here are the errors > I receive when I try to start them: > > XMMS: > Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 83 in file > /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0) > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > mplayer: > Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 83 in file > /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0) > Abort trap (core dumped) > > I'm not sure if this is a new feature in 5 or a debugging problem or > what. Does anyone have any help they can offer? Check the archives, this is a FAQ. Kris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 08:31:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BE516A4CF; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:31:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rotfl.com.au (eth1779.sa.adsl.internode.on.net [150.101.235.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086DA43D2D; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:31:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Phil@Kernick.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rotfl.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07D174404; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:01:41 +0930 (CST) Received: from mail.rotfl.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.rotfl.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 33686-05-3; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:01:38 +0930 (CST) Message-ID: <4147FDEA.1090007@Kernick.org> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:01:38 +0930 From: Phil Kernick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4147AC40.80507@xmission.com> <20040915064340.GC63279@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20040915064340.GC63279@hub.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at rotfl.com.au cc: Jason Porter cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spinlock problem in 5.3-Beta X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:31:44 -0000 Why are people continuing to ask -CURRENT questions in -STABLE? Just because 5.3-RELEASE will probably become stable, it isn't -STABLE now, and the -STABLE list isn't the place to ask questions. Please take them back to -CURRENT where they belong. Phil. Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:43:12PM -0600, Jason Porter wrote: > >>I cvsuped last week, on 9 Sept and since then I've installed XMMS and >>mplayer from the ports and neither one of them work, here are the errors >>I receive when I try to start them: >> >>XMMS: >>Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 83 in file >>/usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0) >>Segmentation fault (core dumped) >> >>mplayer: >>Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 83 in file >>/usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0) >>Abort trap (core dumped) >> >>I'm not sure if this is a new feature in 5 or a debugging problem or >>what. Does anyone have any help they can offer? > > > Check the archives, this is a FAQ. > > Kris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- _-_|\ Phil Kernick / \ E-Mail: Phil@Kernick.org \_.-*_/ Mobile: 041 61 ROTFL v "Age! Fac ut gaudeam." From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 17:05:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC64B16A4CF; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:05:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from phuket.psconsult.nl (ps226.psconsult.nl [213.222.19.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E2E43D45; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:05:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fb-stable@psconsult.nl) Received: from phuket.psconsult.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phuket.psconsult.nl (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8FH50Ye023785; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:05:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fb-stable@psconsult.nl) Received: (from paul@localhost) by phuket.psconsult.nl (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id i8FH502j023784; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:05:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:04:59 +0200 From: Paul Schenkeveld To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040915170459.GA23228@psconsult.nl> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Trying to get Quatech quad SIO to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:05:03 -0000 Hi All, I need some help with a quad serial I/O card and the puc driver. Hardware: Intel SCB2/SCSI board, dual Pentium 3 1.4GHz, 3GB Ram Quatech QSCLP-100 quad serial board OS: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p1 #8: Wed Sep 15 18:13:54 CEST 2004 After a long search I finally found a quad serial board for 3.3V only PCI bus available locally: Quatech QSCLP-100. It's not automatically recognized by the puc(4) driver so I tried to guess the entry in pucdata.c from the pciconf -l output: # pciconf -l | grep none0 none0@pci2:10:0: class=0x070200 card=0x0170135c chip=0x0170135c rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 I added the following to the end of pucdata.c: { "Quatech quad PCI/LP", { 0x135c, 0x0170, 0, 0 }, { 0xffff, 0xffff, 0, 0 }, { { PUC_PORT_TYPE_COM, 0x10, 0x00, COM_FREQ }, { PUC_PORT_TYPE_COM, 0x10, 0x08, COM_FREQ }, { PUC_PORT_TYPE_COM, 0x10, 0x10, COM_FREQ }, { PUC_PORT_TYPE_COM, 0x10, 0x18, COM_FREQ }, }, }, >From dmesg I can see that the card is recognized but could not be configured (boot -v flag used): found-> vendor=0x135c, dev=0x0170, revid=0x01 class=07-02-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=18 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base febf0000, size 7 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base 00004000, size 7 map[18]: type 1, range 32, base 00004080, size 5 pci2: on pcib2 puc0: port 0x4080-0x409f,0x4000-0x407f mem 0xfebf0000-0xfe bf007f irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci2 could not get resource could not get resource could not get resource could not get resource >From the documentation I know the board has 16750 Uarts and an interrupt status register. The documentation (and sources for a Linux driver) are at: http://www.psconsult.nl/quatech/ Can anyone tell me how to get this board to work, preferrably with FreeBSD-4? Many thanks in advance! Paul Schenkeveld From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 00:20:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EC316A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:20:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218CD43D39 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:20:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus.vinicius.ferreira@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 76so354752rnl for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:20:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.70.19 with SMTP id s19mr1437920rna; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:20:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.78.36 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:20:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:20:35 -0300 From: Marcus Vinicius Ferreira To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marcus Vinicius Ferreira List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:20:36 -0000 -- Marcus Vinicius Ferreira From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 01:32:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7221516A4CE; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 01:32:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk2.snu.ac.kr (auk2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AD343D49; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 01:32:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (spamrefuse@yahoo.com) by auk2.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004091610:32:44:236635.29654.2629589936 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:32:44 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <4148ED44.7080708@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:32:52 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040901 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: YES-__TRSYS_LV__3 (SR:-2.81) (SRN:SPAMROBOT) ----------------- Subject: xosview broken for 5.3-BETA4 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 01:32:54 -0000 I am running 5.3-BETA4, from Sept. 13th cvsup. Today I installed xosview: $ xosview xosview: kvm_nlist() lookup failed for symbol '_intr_countp'. xosview: safe_kvm_read() was attempted on EA 0 Any idea what's going wrong here? Rob. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 04:24:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B30616A4CE; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 04:24:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cliffclavin.cs.rpi.edu (cliffclavin.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.1.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8B543D5D; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 04:24:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crossd@cs.rpi.edu) Received: from monica.cs.rpi.edu (root@monica.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.7.2]) i8G4OW0o022653 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:24:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from monica.cs.rpi.edu (crossd@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by monica.cs.rpi.edu (8.12.9p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i8G4OW2j024104; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:24:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from crossd@monica.cs.rpi.edu) Received: from localhost (crossd@localhost)i8G4OWtM024101; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:24:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from crossd@monica.cs.rpi.edu) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:24:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "David E. Cross" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040916000619.B22029@monica.cs.rpi.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Subject: 5.3, libstc++, gcc34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 04:24:34 -0000 I recently upgraded my 5.2.1-RELEASE-p# laptop to 5.3-BETA3 in order to help test things out. (Well, first I updated to BETA2, but I got nailed by the UDMA ICH3 bug... that is fixed thankfully). What I got nailed by now is gcc34 and C++ ABI changing. That's not "our" fault, I understand and respect that. What is our fault is not protecting the user from these changes. There are a fair number of people out there, early adopters, who installed the 5.x-"RELEASE" branches (I emphasize the fact the these were advertised as "-RELEASE" by "us"), who will now be screwed as a result, with their only choice (other than playing library whack-a-mole... which I have spent 5+hours on already on my personal laptop) is a complete reinstall from scratch. Many will find this unacceptable; If I were a lesser user, I would. There is a solution to this, bump the version number on the c++ libraries in the core OS. We have done this before for other GCC ABI changes, I believe we even did this _within_ the 4.x-STABLE branch (I could be mistaken on this). What happens if we "don't" do this: 1) We screw early adopters, those who have run "-RELEASE" and helped us get the bugs out, get performance numbers, etc. These people may not be developers, they really can be (and are) end users. 2) We screw application vendors who have developed code and products using c++ for the 5.x branch (or just linked against libraries that then link to c++) 3) We screw end developers (like I have at my location), who have started developing and using code, rebuilding is not always an easy option. What happens if we "do" do this (by "do" I mean bump version numbers): 1) We DON'T screw people following any of the 5.x-RELEASE branches 2) We screw those following -CURRENT... but this isn't stable anyway, and they/we are told to expect this type of breakage. 3) We screw the beta testers, potentially. They either had to do fresh installs or reinstalls anyway, they don't have any substantial infrastructure invested in the current system. In short, as a vendor of a major OS, I would screw OS developers, and beta testers NUMEROUS times before ever touching the end user; especially for a product that has been -RELEASEed for over a year. -- David E. Cross From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 15:35:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EDA16A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:35:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ntw1.ymcastlouis.org (mail.ymcastlouis.org [66.134.157.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D060043D3F for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:35:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.3 September 26, 2003 Message-ID: From: jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:37:52 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ntw1/YMCASTLOUIS.ORG(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 09/16/2004 10:37:54, Serialize complete at 09/16/2004 10:37:54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:35:25 -0000 I've got a number of IBM xSeries x225 servers, which are dual-capable but right now have only one Xeon processor each. Attempting to boot from the install CD for both 5.2.1 and 5.3-BETA3 yields the same problem - endless streams of what look like register states, seperated by single characters of the '/|\-' sequence. Doesn't even get past the boot loader. Any thoughts on this? I'm in the process of switching all of my i386 NetBSD and Novell servers over to FreeBSD (faster release cycle, so better new hardware support), so I'm not familair with the subtle nuances of FreeBSD yet, but I do have it working on about 4 other machines - 3 single-processor machines and one dual-processor with both CPUs in place. I'm wondering if the problem might have something to do with that empty processor socket, or the fact that it's a Xeon. -Jim From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 15:47:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595EF16A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:47:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD0A43D46 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:47:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from niels@piersma.com) Received: from mail.piersma.com (pmail.xs4all.nl [80.126.77.167]) i8GFlXcL017192 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:47:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from niels@piersma.com) Received: from piersma.com (icarus.piersma.local [172.16.32.8]) by mail.piersma.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8GFlNvF009974 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:47:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from niels@piersma.com) Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:47:23 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? thread-index: AcScAuKsbDUh1N6oTZm7ghhQFfHWGgAAU1+w From: "Niels Piersma" To: X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.piersma.com Subject: RE: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:47:36 -0000 Jim, I have the same problem. Even after BIOS upgrades etc. it didn't want to boot. (endless screens of dumps). In the end I reverted back to FreeBSD 4.10.=20 I can confirm this problem occurs on SINGLE processor x225 machines. %Niels -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org Sent: donderdag 16 september 2004 17:38 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? I've got a number of IBM xSeries x225 servers, which are dual-capable but=20 right now have only one Xeon processor each. Attempting to boot from the install CD for both 5.2.1 and 5.3-BETA3 yields the same problem - endless=20 streams of what look like register states, seperated by single characters=20 of the '/|\-' sequence. Doesn't even get past the boot loader.=20 Any thoughts on this? I'm in the process of switching all of my i386=20 NetBSD and Novell servers over to FreeBSD (faster release cycle, so better=20 new hardware support), so I'm not familair with the subtle nuances of=20 FreeBSD yet, but I do have it working on about 4 other machines - 3=20 single-processor machines and one dual-processor with both CPUs in place.=20 I'm wondering if the problem might have something to do with that empty=20 processor socket, or the fact that it's a Xeon. -Jim _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Piersma.COM is een handelsnaam van Piersma Beheer B.V. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for = the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not = disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender = immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and = delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be = guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be = intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or = contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any = errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a = result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please = request a hard-copy version. =20 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 16:40:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEF916A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:40:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hermes.uci.kun.nl (hermes.uci.kun.nl [131.174.93.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4A243D41 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:40:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdamen@sci.kun.nl) Received: from bavaria (vhe-383505.sshn.net [195.169.208.89]) by hermes.uci.kun.nl (PMDF V6.2-X17 #30689) with SMTP id <0I4500D1G7NIII@hermes.uci.kun.nl> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:40:36 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:39:57 +0200 From: Xander Damen To: Niels Piersma , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <000a01c49c0b$cd7e0d20$0200000a@bavaria> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 Content-type: text/plain; reply-type=original; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: Subject: Re: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:40:48 -0000 Don't know if it is exactly the same problem, but when I tried to boot 5.x on the IBM Netfinity 5100, it would hang. When I disabled acpi in the kernel it did boot. Xander ----- Original Message ----- From: "Niels Piersma" To: Sent: Thursday 16 September 2004 17:47 Subject: RE: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? Jim, I have the same problem. Even after BIOS upgrades etc. it didn't want to boot. (endless screens of dumps). In the end I reverted back to FreeBSD 4.10. I can confirm this problem occurs on SINGLE processor x225 machines. %Niels -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org Sent: donderdag 16 september 2004 17:38 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? I've got a number of IBM xSeries x225 servers, which are dual-capable but right now have only one Xeon processor each. Attempting to boot from the install CD for both 5.2.1 and 5.3-BETA3 yields the same problem - endless streams of what look like register states, seperated by single characters of the '/|\-' sequence. Doesn't even get past the boot loader. Any thoughts on this? I'm in the process of switching all of my i386 NetBSD and Novell servers over to FreeBSD (faster release cycle, so better new hardware support), so I'm not familair with the subtle nuances of FreeBSD yet, but I do have it working on about 4 other machines - 3 single-processor machines and one dual-processor with both CPUs in place. I'm wondering if the problem might have something to do with that empty processor socket, or the fact that it's a Xeon. -Jim _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Piersma.COM is een handelsnaam van Piersma Beheer B.V. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 16:44:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B97C16A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:44:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from master.azm.uz.ua (ns.azm.uz.ua [195.137.255.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B84643D3F for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:44:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ash@azm.uz.ua) Received: from ashway (ashway.azm.uz.ua [195.137.255.56]) by master.azm.uz.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6) with SMTP id i8GGi20Z074696 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:44:02 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ash@azm.uz.ua) Message-ID: <037e01c49c0c$5f1d1aa0$38ff89c3@ashway> From: "Andrey Sharandakov" To: Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:44:01 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Promise PDC20378 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:44:12 -0000 Hello All! Does FreeBSD 4.10 support Promise PDC20378 based RAID controller? -- Best regards, Andrey Sharandakov From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 16:56:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10FB16A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:56:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from master.azm.uz.ua (ns.azm.uz.ua [195.137.255.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F88F43D49 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:56:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ash@azm.uz.ua) Received: from ashway (ashway.azm.uz.ua [195.137.255.56]) by master.azm.uz.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6) with SMTP id i8GGtu0Z075446 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:55:56 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ash@azm.uz.ua) Message-ID: <039301c49c0e$08838a10$38ff89c3@ashway> From: "Andrey Sharandakov" To: Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:55:55 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: Promise PDC20378 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:56:02 -0000 I'd been looking there before I wrote, but it's not a complete list I think. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Xander Damen" To: "Andrey Sharandakov" Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 7:45 PM Subject: Re: Promise PDC20378 > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.10R/hardware-i386.html#AEN34 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrey Sharandakov" > To: > Sent: Thursday 16 September 2004 18:44 > Subject: Promise PDC20378 > > > > Hello All! > > > > Does FreeBSD 4.10 support Promise PDC20378 > > based RAID controller? > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Andrey Sharandakov > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 17:16:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAFB16A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:16:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gate.leissner.se (gate.leissner.se [212.3.0.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1BB43D1F for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:16:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pol@leissner.se) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gate.leissner.se (8.9.3-030919/8.9.3) id TAA11409; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:16:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from UNKNOWN(192.71.29.17), claiming to be "pol.leissner.se" via SMTP by gate.leissner.se, id smtpdK11404; Thu Sep 16 19:16:44 2004 Received: from pol.leissner.se (localhost.leissner.se [127.0.0.1]) by pol.leissner.se (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8GHGhaw006755; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:16:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pol@leissner.se) Received: from localhost (pol@localhost)i8GHGhvX006752; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:16:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pol@leissner.se) X-Authentication-Warning: pol.leissner.se: pol owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:16:43 +0200 (SST) From: Peter Olsson To: Andrey Sharandakov In-Reply-To: <037e01c49c0c$5f1d1aa0$38ff89c3@ashway> Message-ID: <20040916191102.S13801@pol.leissner.se> References: <037e01c49c0c$5f1d1aa0$38ff89c3@ashway> X-NCC-RegID: se.leissner X-Organization: Leissner Data AB MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Promise PDC20378 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:16:47 -0000 On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:44 +0300, Andrey Sharandakov wrote: > Does FreeBSD 4.10 support Promise PDC20378 > based RAID controller? Doesn't seem so. We just moved a 4.10p2 system disk to a new motherboard which includes the PDC20378. 4.10p2 can't find the RAID unit we created on the PDC20378. However, 5.3 BETA 4 seems to recognize it, at least up to the point where we can choose the PDC20378 RAID unit in the FreeBSD installer. -- Peter Olsson pol@leissner.se From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 17:58:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB2316A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:58:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C6843D31 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:58:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D1F2178C for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:58:00 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-8--1061320327; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: From: Vivek Khera Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:58:00 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:58:04 -0000 --Apple-Mail-8--1061320327 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Sep 16, 2004, at 11:37 AM, jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org wrote: > I've got a number of IBM xSeries x225 servers, which are dual-capable > but > right now have only one Xeon processor each. Attempting to boot from > the > install CD for both 5.2.1 and 5.3-BETA3 yields the same problem - > endless > streams of what look like register states, seperated by single > characters > of the '/|\-' sequence. Doesn't even get past the boot loader. > Does it look like what I just submitted in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=71800 I'm on a generic system with an AMD Duron 850MHz processor. This has only happend to me on BETA3 (just cvsup'd to BETA4). Hopefully it won't happen again! --Apple-Mail-8--1061320327-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 18:00:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F06616A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:00:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0D943D49 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:00:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from niels@piersma.com) Received: from mail.piersma.com (pmail.xs4all.nl [80.126.77.167]) i8GI0Q7F079524 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:00:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from niels@piersma.com) Received: from piersma.com (icarus.piersma.local [172.16.32.8]) by mail.piersma.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8GI0Gik010377 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:00:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from niels@piersma.com) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:00:16 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? Thread-Index: AcScDArgj27BDdE9QkSzDnfqmK+sWQACtf7A From: "Niels Piersma" To: "Xander Damen" , X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.piersma.com Subject: RE: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:00:28 -0000 I'll try later this week. (After IBM repairs my server!!!) It just broke down today. Doesn't respond to powerbutton anymore..... %Niels -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Xander Damen Sent: donderdag 16 september 2004 18:40 To: Niels Piersma; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? Don't know if it is exactly the same problem, but when I tried to boot 5.x=20 on the IBM Netfinity 5100, it would hang. When I disabled acpi in the kernel=20 it did boot. Xander ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Niels Piersma" To: Sent: Thursday 16 September 2004 17:47 Subject: RE: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? Jim, I have the same problem. Even after BIOS upgrades etc. it didn't want to boot. (endless screens of dumps). In the end I reverted back to FreeBSD 4.10. I can confirm this problem occurs on SINGLE processor x225 machines. %Niels -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org Sent: donderdag 16 september 2004 17:38 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? I've got a number of IBM xSeries x225 servers, which are dual-capable but right now have only one Xeon processor each. Attempting to boot from the install CD for both 5.2.1 and 5.3-BETA3 yields the same problem - endless streams of what look like register states, seperated by single characters of the '/|\-' sequence. Doesn't even get past the boot loader. Any thoughts on this? I'm in the process of switching all of my i386 NetBSD and Novell servers over to FreeBSD (faster release cycle, so better new hardware support), so I'm not familair with the subtle nuances of FreeBSD yet, but I do have it working on about 4 other machines - 3 single-processor machines and one dual-processor with both CPUs in place. I'm wondering if the problem might have something to do with that empty processor socket, or the fact that it's a Xeon. -Jim _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Piersma.COM is een handelsnaam van Piersma Beheer B.V. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the=20 individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not=20 disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender=20 immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete=20 this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be=20 secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,=20 destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender=20 therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the=20 contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If=20 verification is required please request a hard-copy version. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 18:03:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6599F16A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:03:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A5743D55 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:03:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from info@piersma.com) Received: from mail.piersma.com (pmail.xs4all.nl [80.126.77.167]) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8GI3FQ1070650 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:03:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from info@piersma.com) Received: from piersma.com (icarus.piersma.local [172.16.32.8]) by mail.piersma.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8GI3B2L010400 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:03:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from info@piersma.com) Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:03:10 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? thread-index: AcScFt4RJRtDiR4cTVuKoSEzQjd6dQAAG03Y From: "Company Mail Archive" To: "Vivek Khera" , X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.piersma.com Subject: RE: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:03:26 -0000 No, not at all. The x225Bug looks like full x86 32-bit debug dumps. = full-screen-colums with memory adresses. Etc. =20 %Niels -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----=20 Van: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org namens Vivek Khera=20 Verzonden: do 16-9-2004 19:58=20 Aan: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org=20 CC:=20 Onderwerp: Re: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? =09 =09 Piersma.COM is een handelsnaam van Piersma Beheer B.V. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for = the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not = disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender = immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and = delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be = guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be = intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or = contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any = errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a = result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please = request a hard-copy version. =20 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 21:30:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A897916A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:30:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD50D43D48 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:30:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C83pK-0003Sz-00 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:30:02 +0200 Received: from ipro.de ([82.98.70.82]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:30:02 +0200 Received: from J.Knuth by ipro.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:30:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Jochen Knuth Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:06:16 +0200 Lines: 149 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070504080201000402060007" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ipro.de User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jochenkn.intern.ipro.de Sender: news Subject: Re: IBM xSeries 225 with single processor - can't boot 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:30:04 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070504080201000402060007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org schrieb: > I've got a number of IBM xSeries x225 servers, which are dual-capable but > right now have only one Xeon processor each. Attempting to boot from the > install CD for both 5.2.1 and 5.3-BETA3 yields the same problem - endless > streams of what look like register states, seperated by single characters > of the '/|\-' sequence. Doesn't even get past the boot loader. > ... i had the same problem on the IBM xSeries x225, trying to boot it with several version of 5.x but without success. Only after installing Linux on the server i made an last attempt and booted some rescue cd (http://www.sysresccd.org/ ) which had the "smart boot manager" on it. i got into the smart boot manager, changed the cd to a 5.x one and selected to boot from cd and it worked. I have attached a dmesg from the server, since then updated to Beta4 (it was before the beta phase when i tried it) > -Jim > _______________________________________________ Ciao, Jochen -- -------------------------------------------------- Jochen Knuth WebMaster http://www.ipro.de IPRO GmbH Phone ++49-7152-93330 Steinbeisstr. 6 Fax ++49-7152-933340 71229 Leonberg EMail: J.Knuth@ipro.de --------------070504080201000402060007 Content-Type: text/plain; name="dmesg.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="dmesg.txt" Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.3-BETA4 #1: Mon Sep 13 22:34:11 CEST 2004 root@unix2server.intern.ipro.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/IPRO5 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2800.11-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebfbff Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 1610547200 (1535 MB) avail memory = 1572716544 (1499 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 4 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 48-71 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe8000000-0xebffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib1: mem 0xec000000-0xefffffff at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 2.0 on pci0 pcib2: could not get PCI interrupt routing table for \\_SB_.PCI0.P64A - AE_NOT_FOUND pci2: on pcib2 pci2: at device 28.0 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 29.0 on pci2 pci3: on pcib3 bge0: mem 0xf6000000-0xf600ffff irq 48 at device 1.0 on pci3 miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:0c:76:ed:32:f1 pci2: at device 30.0 (no driver attached) pcib4: at device 31.0 on pci2 pci4: on pcib4 ips0: mem 0xf0000000-0xf3ffffff,0xf5000000-0xf5000fff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci4 ips0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pci0: at device 2.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 29.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 29.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 29.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 29.7 (no driver attached) pcib5: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci5: on pcib5 ahc0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem 0xf9000000-0xf9000fff irq 21 at device 0.0 on pci5 ahc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7860: Ultra Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 3/253 SCBs pci5: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 31.5 (no driver attached) fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f2-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 sio0 port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xce000-0xce7ff,0xc8000-0xc97ff,0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 sc0: on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x200> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec ATAPI_RESET time = 60us acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle ips0: resetting adapter, this may take up to 5 minutes ips0: adapter type: ServeRAID 6i (sebring) ips0: logical drives: 1 ips0: Logical Drive 0: RAID5 sectors: 142192640, state OK ipsd0: on ips0 ipsd0: Logical Drive (69430MB) SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ipsd0s1a --------------070504080201000402060007-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 21:46:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4709016A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:46:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out01.grupos.com.br (out01.grupos.com.br [200.203.183.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362AE43D2D for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:46:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@corp.grupos.com.br) Received: from corp.grupos.com.br (unknown [150.162.166.55]) by out01.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D752C1A8592 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:46:35 -0300 (BRT) Received: from corp.grupos.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corp.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CE3F20A8D for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:46:35 -0300 (BRT) Received: from [150.162.166.51] (unknown [150.162.166.51]) by corp.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F04220A8A; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:46:35 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <414A09BA.3050406@corp.grupos.com.br> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:46:34 -0300 From: Marcus Grando User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Bug in setrlimit() on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:46:41 -0000 Hi list, I discovered one bug in setrlimit on 4.10-RELEASE-p2. When setting rlim_cur < 1474268*1024, system return SIGBUS, but rlim_cur=1474268*1024 work. On 4.10-RELEASE this issue not occurs. Example and strace above... --example.c-- #include #include #include int main() { struct rlimit limit; limit.rlim_cur=1474267*1024; limit.rlim_max=1536000*1024; setrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK , &limit); exit(0); } -- --strace on 4.10-RELEASE-p2-- execve("./setrlimit-bug", ["./setrlimit-bug"], [/* 14 vars */]) = 0 mmap(0, 2048, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0x65c65000 munmap(0x65c65000, 2048) = 0 __sysctl([hw.pagesize], 2, "\0\20\0\0", [4], NULL, 0) = 0 mmap(0, 32768, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0x65c65000 geteuid(0xbfbffca4) = 0 getuid() = 0 (euid 0) getegid(0xbfbffca4) = 0 getgid() = 0 (egid 0) open("/etc/libmap.conf", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/var/run/ld-elf.so.hints", O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, "Ehnt\1\0\0\0\200\0\0\0=\0\0\0\0\0\0\0<\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 128) = 128 lseek(3, 128, SEEK_SET) = 128 read(3, "/usr/lib:/usr/lib/compat:/usr/lo"..., 61) = 61 close(3) = 0 access("/usr/lib/libc.so.4", F_OK) = 0 open("/usr/lib/libc.so.4", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=677180, ...}) = 0 read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\t\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\254$\1"..., 4096) = 4096 mmap(0, 724992, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_NOCORE, 3, 0) = 0x65c6d000 mprotect(0x65d06000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0 mprotect(0x65d06000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0 mmap(0x65d07000, 16384, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x99000) = 0x65d07000 mmap(0x65d0b000, 77824, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0x65d0b000 close(3) = 0 mmap(0, 128, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0x65d1e000 munmap(0x65d1e000, 128) = 0 mmap(0, 13360, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0x65d1e000 munmap(0x65d1e000, 13360) = 0 sigaction(SIGILL, {0x65c4f520, [], 0}, {SIG_DFL}) = 0 sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, []) = 0 sigaction(SIGILL, {SIG_DFL}, NULL) = 0 sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, ~[ILL TRAP ABRT EMT FPE BUS SEGV SYS], []) = 0 sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL) = 0 setrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, {rlim_cur=1474267*1024, rlim_max=1536000*1024}) = 0 --- SIGBUS (Bus error) --- --- SIGBUS (Bus error) --- -- --strace on 4.10-RELEASE-- execve("./setrlimit-bug", ["./setrlimit-bug"], [/* 17 vars */]) = 0 mmap(0, 2048, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0x46865000 munmap(0x46865000, 2048) = 0 __sysctl([hw.pagesize], 2, "\0\20\0\0", [4], NULL, 0) = 0 mmap(0, 32768, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0x46865000 geteuid(0xbfbffc44) = 0 getuid() = 0 (euid 0) getegid(0xbfbffc44) = 0 getgid() = 0 (egid 0) open("/etc/libmap.conf", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/var/run/ld-elf.so.hints", O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, "Ehnt\1\0\0\0\200\0\0\0<\3\0\0\0\0\0\0;\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 128) = 128 lseek(3, 128, SEEK_SET) = 128 read(3, "/usr/lib:/usr/lib/compat:/usr/lo"..., 828) = 828 close(3) = 0 access("/usr/lib/libc.so.4", F_OK) = 0 open("/usr/lib/libc.so.4", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=677180, ...}) = 0 read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\t\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\254$\1"..., 4096) = 4096 mmap(0, 724992, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_NOCORE, 3, 0) = 0x4686d000 mprotect(0x46906000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0 mprotect(0x46906000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0 mmap(0x46907000, 16384, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x99000) = 0x46907000 mmap(0x4690b000, 77824, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0x4690b000 close(3) = 0 mmap(0, 128, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0x4691e000 munmap(0x4691e000, 128) = 0 mmap(0, 13360, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0x4691e000 munmap(0x4691e000, 13360) = 0 sigaction(SIGILL, {0x4684f520, [], 0}, {SIG_DFL}) = 0 sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, []) = 0 sigaction(SIGILL, {SIG_DFL}, NULL) = 0 sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, ~[ILL TRAP ABRT EMT FPE BUS SEGV SYS], []) = 0 sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL) = 0 setrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, {rlim_cur=1024*1024, rlim_max=1536000*1024}) = 0 exit(0) = ? -- Regards -- Marcus Grando Grupos Internet S/A marcus(at)corp.grupos.com.br From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 22:19:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A593B16A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:19:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953F243D2D for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:19:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from elischer.org (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618C97A3D2; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <414A118F.6050007@elischer.org> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:19:59 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030516 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith References: <4143931B.5080104@math.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <4143931B.5080104@math.missouri.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 2 Processors under FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:19:59 -0000 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > I have a dual Athlon MP computer, and I have a very recent version of > FreeBSD 5.3 running on it. > > If I start 6 computer intensive processes, and then kill 3 of them > that are using (say) processor 1, > then the other 3 processes are all processor 0, and as such only get > 33% computer time each. > > Under FreeBSD 4.10 they would have got 66% computer time each, because > there each process didn't seem stuck to a particular processor. > > Is there a sysctl variable that controls this, or is this a bug in > FreeBSD 5.3, or what is going on? > > Here is the computer intensive process: > > main() { > int i; > while(1) {i++;} > } what scheduler are you using? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 17 07:46:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDF816A4CF for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 07:46:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8C643D5C for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 07:46:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i8H7kOAV075634 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:46:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:46:24 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040917103749.D73146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Bug in setrlimit() on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 07:46:39 -0000 Hello! > Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:46:34 -0300 > From: Marcus Grando > > I discovered one bug in setrlimit on 4.10-RELEASE-p2. When setting > rlim_cur < 1474268*1024, system return SIGBUS, but rlim_cur=1474268*1024 > work. > > On 4.10-RELEASE this issue not occurs. > > Example and strace above... Not repeatable here: dmitry@lynx$ uname -a FreeBSD lynx.atlantis.dp.ua 4.10-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2 #0: Thu Jul 1 16:04:53 EEST 2004 dmitry@test.atlantis.dp.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HOSTING i386 dmitry@lynx$ ./a.out dmitry@lynx$ I would check that kernel build options are the same for RELEASE and RELEASE-p2, and contents of /etc/login.conf are the same too, because code in question hasn't been changed between them. Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 17 17:58:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310C216A4E4 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:58:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82FE43D2F for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:58:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1C8N0C-0005eO-1k for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:58:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:58:31 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040917175831.GB18526@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Subject: supporting broadcom gig BCM5751 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:58:33 -0000 I'm trying to install a new dell machine at work but it's coming up with an unknown internal gig ether card and it's stupidly fussy about PCI cards (won't boot with random cards in it). The device is; 0x14e4 0x1677 which some searching tells me is a broadcom BCM5751 gig ether card. Adding the device ids to if_bge.c and if_bgereg.h; #define BCOM_DEVICEID_BCM5751 0x1677 { BCOM_VENDORID, BCOM_DEVICEID_BCM5751, "Broadcom BCM5751 Gigabit Ethernet" }, and PXE booting with the new kernel gives me; bge0: mem 0xdfcf0000-0xdfcfffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci2 NMI ISA a0, EISA ff RAM parity error, likely hardware failure. Fatal trap 19: non-maskable interrupt trap while in kernel mode instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc028a8cb stack pointer = 0x10:0xc0821d4c frame pointer = 0x10:0xc0821d54 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (swapper) interrupt mask = net tty bio cam trap number = 19 panic: non-maskable interrupt trap This doesn't happen with a default kernel (or my special build kernel without the source patch). ANy hints or does this need real driver support work ? P. -- pir From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 17 19:57:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A30316A4CE for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:57:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from jk.homeunix.net (memnoch.CSUChico.EDU [132.241.67.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA1343D2D for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:57:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jk@jk.homeunix.net) Received: from jk.homeunix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jk.homeunix.net (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8HJvJwA085906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from warlock@localhost) by jk.homeunix.net (8.13.1/8.13.0/Submit) id i8HJvJ1K085905; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:57:19 -0700 From: John Kennedy To: Peter Radcliffe Message-ID: <20040917195719.GA81806@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> References: <20040917175831.GB18526@pir.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040917175831.GB18526@pir.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-jk-MailScanner: No infection found X-jk-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, required 6, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-jk-MailScanner-From: warlock@jk.homeunix.net cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: supporting broadcom gig BCM5751 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:57:21 -0000 On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 01:58:31PM -0400, Peter Radcliffe wrote: > I'm trying to install a new dell machine at work but it's coming up > with an unknown internal gig ether card and it's stupidly fussy about > PCI cards (won't boot with random cards in it). > > The device is; 0x14e4 0x1677 which some searching tells me is a > broadcom BCM5751 gig ether card. I have a few Dell 2650s at work and I had to load FreeBSD 5.2.1 (vs. 4.x-STABLE, which at the time was 4.9). They've all been up to long so I don't have any handy dmesg output to compare to yours. pciconf gives me this, which may be of some help: bge0@pci3:6:0: class=0x020000 card=0x01211028 chip=0x16a714e4 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'BCM5703X NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet' class = network subclass = ethernet The "chip" field is close to yours, but not an exact match. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 17 20:34:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B8416A4CE for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 20:34:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C1F43D3F for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 20:34:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1C8PRO-0006o9-Sp for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:34:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:34:46 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040917203446.GE18526@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20040917175831.GB18526@pir.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040917175831.GB18526@pir.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Subject: supporting ICH6 SATA controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 20:34:48 -0000 --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline This one I seemed to get working fine. Patch attatched. P. -- pir --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ata.patch" *** sys/dev/ata/ata-pci.c.orig Fri Sep 17 15:23:46 2004 --- sys/dev/ata/ata-pci.c Fri Sep 17 15:37:13 2004 *************** *** 156,161 **** --- 156,164 ---- case 0x24db8086: return "Intel ICH5 ATA100 controller"; + case 0x26528086: + return "Intel ICH6 SATA150 controller"; + case 0x522910b9: if (pci_get_revid(dev) >= 0xc4) return "AcerLabs Aladdin ATA100 controller"; *************** *** 634,639 **** --- 637,643 ---- break; case 0x24d18086: /* Intel ICH5 SATA150 */ + case 0x26528086: /* Intel ICH6 SATA150 */ dmastat = ATA_INB(ch->r_bmio, ATA_BMSTAT_PORT); if ((dmastat & (ATA_BMSTAT_ACTIVE | ATA_BMSTAT_INTERRUPT)) != ATA_BMSTAT_INTERRUPT) *** sys/dev/ata/ata-dma.c.orig Wed Dec 31 13:05:16 2003 --- sys/dev/ata/ata-dma.c Fri Sep 17 15:39:40 2004 *************** *** 218,223 **** --- 218,224 ---- case 0x24db8086: /* Intel ICH5 */ case 0x24d18086: /* Intel ICH5 SATA */ + case 0x26528086: /* Intel ICH6 SATA */ case 0x24ca8086: /* Intel ICH4 mobile */ case 0x24cb8086: /* Intel ICH4 */ case 0x248a8086: /* Intel ICH3 mobile */ --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 17 21:23:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A49D16A4CE for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:23:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC6143D1D for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:23:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1C8QCa-0007FL-CV for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:23:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:23:32 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040917212332.GH18526@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20040917175831.GB18526@pir.net> <20040917195719.GA81806@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040917195719.GA81806@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Subject: Re: supporting broadcom gig BCM5751 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:23:33 -0000 John Kennedy probably said: > I have a few Dell 2650s at work and I had to load FreeBSD 5.2.1 (vs. > 4.x-STABLE, which at the time was 4.9). They've all been up to long so I > don't have any handy dmesg output to compare to yours. > > pciconf gives me this, which may be of some help: > > bge0@pci3:6:0: class=0x020000 card=0x01211028 chip=0x16a714e4 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > device = 'BCM5703X NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > The "chip" field is close to yours, but not an exact match. I have other machines with Broadcom gig ether cards, including another Dell, but it's this exact chipset I'm having trouble with not anything that is close. P. -- pir From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 18 11:08:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C0616A4CE; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 11:08:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p15140542.pureserver.info (papendorf-se.de [217.160.222.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30AF43D1F; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 11:08:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nagilum.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by p15140542.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id E116E2F411C; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 13:08:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from p15140542.pureserver.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p15140542 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07255-03; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 13:08:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cakebox.homeunix.net (stgt-d9bb31e6.pool.mediaWays.net [217.187.49.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by p15140542.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F422F4119; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 13:08:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cakebox.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B27E3029E1; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 13:07:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cakebox.homeunix.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cakebox.tis [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15354-06; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 13:06:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.1.4] (scorpio.tis [10.1.1.4]) by cakebox.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CCE302902; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 13:06:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <414C16F9.3000608@nagilum.org> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 13:07:37 +0200 From: Nagilum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Puna Tannehill References: <414707C5.3010803@imagescape.com> In-Reply-To: <414707C5.3010803@imagescape.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cakebox.homeunix.net X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at papendorf-se.de cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded, error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 11:08:15 -0000 Hi Puna, This looks like there occured a looping recursion, there is definately something wrong with your ports. Maybe try to reinstall the dependencies forcefully after bringing your ports tree up-to-date (if that alone does not already help) Kind regards, Alex. Puna Tannehill wrote: > On a freshly rebuild v5.3-BETA4... > > A failed compile of sysutils/fastest_cvsup led me to run 'make clean' > before trying again. It took over 5 minutes to run make clean, and at > the very end I got the following: > > # make clean > kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded; see tuning(7) > Pipe call failed: Too many open files in system > Pipe call failed: Too many open files in system > ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.5.8 > ===> Cleaning for perl-5.8.5 > ===> Cleaning for fastest_cvsup-0.2.8 > > There is nothing specifically in tuning about this particular knob, > but from poking around I get the feeling that it's about memory > management of the kernel IPC subsystem. > > Running 'sysctl kern.ipc.maxpipekva' shows: > > kern.ipc.maxpipekva=1257472 > > Hunting around on in the archives, I came up with people getting this > error while doing very intensive compiles. Seems strange to me that I > might get such an error on a 15min uptime, cold-booted machine and > just doing a 'make clean'. And thoughts? > > Puna > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 18 15:04:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E873A16A4CE for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:04:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from jk.homeunix.net (memnoch.CSUChico.EDU [132.241.67.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B2C43D31 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:04:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jk@jk.homeunix.net) Received: from jk.homeunix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jk.homeunix.net (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8IF3xsf098024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Sep 2004 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from warlock@localhost) by jk.homeunix.net (8.13.1/8.13.0/Submit) id i8IF3xeo098023; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 08:03:59 -0700 From: John Kennedy To: Peter Radcliffe Message-ID: <20040918150359.GA97455@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> References: <20040917175831.GB18526@pir.net> <20040917195719.GA81806@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <20040917212332.GH18526@pir.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040917212332.GH18526@pir.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-jk-MailScanner: No infection found X-jk-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, required 6, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-jk-MailScanner-From: warlock@jk.homeunix.net cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: supporting broadcom gig BCM5751 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:04:02 -0000 On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 05:23:32PM -0400, Peter Radcliffe wrote: > John Kennedy probably said: > > I have a few Dell 2650s at work and I had to load FreeBSD 5.2.1 (vs. > > 4.x-STABLE, which at the time was 4.9). They've all been up to long so I > > don't have any handy dmesg output to compare to yours. > > > > pciconf gives me this, which may be of some help: > > > > bge0@pci3:6:0: class=0x020000 card=0x01211028 chip=0x16a714e4 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > > device = 'BCM5703X NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet' > > class = network > > subclass = ethernet > > > > The "chip" field is close to yours, but not an exact match. > > I have other machines with Broadcom gig ether cards, including another > Dell, but it's this exact chipset I'm having trouble with not anything > that is close. Daniel O'Connor suggested I look in /var/run/dmesg.boot (I was looking in /var/log/dmesg.*). I looked on my 2nd 2650 box which apparently has a slightly different chipset in it, and it should be older than the 1st. The device as identified there is a bit different: bge0: mem 0xfcf10000-0xfcf1ffff irq 28 at device 6.0 on pci3 bge0: Ethernet address: 00:06:5b:f0:7d:c3 miibus0: on bge0 bge0@pci3:6:0: class=0x020000 card=0x01211028 chip=0x164514e4 rev=0x15 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'BCM5701 NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet' class = network subclass = ethernet Still, not your exact chipset (presumably 0x14e4 is vendor and 0x1677 is version, the chip= field has them swapped, and my two machines straddle your chip. I have another 5.3-BETA4 box with a BCM5788 (chip=0x169c14e4) but that isn't the right chip either, and it isn't a Dell. Doesn't really help you, but if I were you I would try booting up under 5.2.1 (if only via CD-ROM), seeing what it reports about the chipset and if it seems to be supported, and then chasing driver-code differences. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 18 18:23:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D911516A4CE for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 18:23:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991C843D45 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 18:23:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1C8jrm-0007ZV-UP for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:23:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:23:22 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040918182322.GC20449@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20040917175831.GB18526@pir.net> <20040917195719.GA81806@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <20040917212332.GH18526@pir.net> <20040918150359.GA97455@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040918150359.GA97455@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Subject: Re: supporting broadcom gig BCM5751 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 18:23:24 -0000 John Kennedy probably said: > Still, not your exact chipset (presumably 0x14e4 is vendor and 0x1677 is > version, the chip= field has them swapped, You're correct. > and my two machines straddle your chip. > I have another 5.3-BETA4 box with a BCM5788 (chip=0x169c14e4) but that > isn't the right chip either, and it isn't a Dell. Yes, there is support for devices either side of the version ID I'm having probles with. Unfortunately it's not supported under HEAD or 5.x; http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/bge/ which is why I was asking for help with how to add support. P. -- pir