From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 9 00:07:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0719616A4CE for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:07:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9584C43D3F for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:07:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hyperbolix@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so98034wra for ; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=F1C1UjZ3mn6S1JpjvFhbbDfeTHGApLPcNEhIT7P7Sy5zsuYK5gVjOf4dt3UmS80KViCVOT02sg7cjGRPxiZWNG74eqzTmF6p/b9y8rR8LYdJe63pTDca5Ir5j90t0vo5YGlWkuF1x0KKjoaXw6p7TPxA62eFKyLl7O6WEthYZCU= Received: by 10.54.31.64 with SMTP id e64mr200264wre; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:07:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.23.47 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:07:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <35cabfb3050108160779f0c84f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:07:19 -0600 From: John Byrne To: riggs@rrr.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: mplayer-0.99.5_5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Byrne List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:07:21 -0000 Hello, Are you planning on upgrading this port to 1.0pre6? It compiles fine for me without any patching but the patches look like they could be applicable to the new sources if modified for the new versions - there are a number of patches that would need to be updated, however. Are they really necessary since it compiles fine from sources? - John B. hyperbolix@gmail.com