From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 03:03:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2968316A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:03:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm-dated-1123038200.ffa994@mired.org) Received: from iimail.mindsync.com (internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8818243D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:03:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm-dated-1123038200.ffa994@mired.org) Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by iimail.mindsync.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5FD3F5C3 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mired.org (mwm@idiom [216.240.32.1]) by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j6O32qv4044278 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:02:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mwm-dated-1123038200.ffa994@mired.org) Received: (qmail 63508 invoked by uid 1001); 24 Jul 2005 03:03:20 -0000 Received: by localhost.mired.org (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1001); Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:03:20 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17123.1272.243457.460650@bhuda.mired.org> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:03:20 -0400 To: ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid X-Primary-Address: mwm@mired.org X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`; h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ From: Mike Meyer X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) Cc: Subject: Recursive dependency? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:03:03 -0000 I get the following in /usr/ports/editors/xemacs: bhuda% make package-depends-list make: Max recursion level (500) exceeded.: Resource temporarily unavailable *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/xemacs. Has someone introduced a recursive dependency? In either case, what needs to happen to get this fixed? Thanks, http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 03:29:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2432716A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:29:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBE143D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:29:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6O3T4NV028083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:29:05 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6O3T36P017473; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:29:04 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 16CF35132C; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:29:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:29:00 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mike Meyer Message-ID: <20050724032900.GA24567@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <17123.1272.243457.460650@bhuda.mired.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17123.1272.243457.460650@bhuda.mired.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recursive dependency? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:29:07 -0000 --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 11:03:20PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: > I get the following in /usr/ports/editors/xemacs: >=20 > bhuda% make package-depends-list > make: Max recursion level (500) exceeded.: Resource temporarily unavailab= le > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/xemacs. >=20 > Has someone introduced a recursive dependency? >=20 > In either case, what needs to happen to get this fixed? This is usually because you specified an illegal USE_* option in the make environment, but perhaps someone committed a mistake. Kris --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC4wr8Wry0BWjoQKURAuL9AJ9R5c9GYO391zFZe4Cffj0FnQxZRQCgqzfM /bWQcUZwHi64/2zLT4GEANc= =/Jio -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 07:54:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB7116A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:54:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (gilmore.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.139.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229C343D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:54:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:2HHbniytlsBD21RaQtS9P98gkiP+kQsr@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6O7sFdw000576 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:54:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tweten@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Dave Tweten Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:54:15 -0700 Message-ID: <575.1122191655@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> Sender: tweten@nas.nasa.gov Subject: x11-fonts/libXft Strangeness X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tweten@nas.nasa.gov List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:54:16 -0000 When I build x11-fonts/libXft on a T23 ThinkPad that has been updated about once a week, I have no problems. On two others that weren't updated for a period recently (May, I think), attempting to make libXft results in the following failure. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool15 --mode=link cc -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -fno-strict-aliasing -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -L/usr/X11R6/lib -o libXft.la -rpath /usr/X11R6/lib -version-number 2:1:2 -no-undefined xftcolor.lo xftcore.lo xftdbg.lo xftdpy.lo xftdraw.lo xftextent.lo xftfont.lo xftfreetype.lo xftglyphs.lo xftinit.lo xftlist.lo xftname.lo xftrender.lo xftstr.lo xftswap.lo xftxlfd.lo -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lfontconfig -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib -lfreetype -lz -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXrender -lXext -lX11 grep: /usr/local/lib/libexpat.la: No such file or directory sed: /usr/local/lib/libexpat.la: No such file or directory libtool15: link: `/usr/local/lib/libexpat.la' is not a valid libtool archive gmake[1]: *** [libXft.la] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-fonts/libXft/work/libXft-2.1 .7' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-fonts/libXft. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- At first I thought the problem was with the libexpat build not creating /usr/local/lib/libexpat.la. That's not the problem. That file doesn't exist on the machine that can build libXft either. Can anyone shed some light on why /usr/local/bin/libtool15 requires /usr/local/lib/libexpat.la on two machines but not on the third (more frequently updated) machine? Libtool15 is not my favorite kind of reading material. Any help avoiding the need to read and understand it would be welcome. -- M/S 258-5 |1024-bit PGP fingerprint:|tweten@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center| 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59| (650) 604-4416 Moffett Field, CA 94035 | 7C 80 10 20 25 C7 2F E6|FAX: (650) 604-4377 Not an official NASA position; you can't even be certain who sent this! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 09:13:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB7116A420 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:13:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nkuzmin@list.ru) Received: from f38.mail.ru (f38.mail.ru [194.67.57.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB44C43D55 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:13:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nkuzmin@list.ru) Received: from mail by f38.mail.ru with local id 1DwcXj-0006L0-00 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:13:07 +0400 Received: from [62.76.229.43] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:13:07 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?Q?=EE=C9=CB=CF=CC=C1=CA=20=EB=D5=DA=D8=CD=C9=CE?= To: ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [62.76.229.43] Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:13:07 +0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Cc: Subject: ltmdm X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?koi8-r?Q?=EE=C9=CB=CF=CC=C1=CA=20=EB=D5=DA=D8=CD=C9=CE?= List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:13:09 -0000 Hello! I have the FreeBSD/amd64 5.4-RELEASE installed on the my PC (processor Athlon64 3200+ "NewCastle"; motherboard ASUS K8N, chipset NVIDIA nForce3 250; internal modem Acorp Sprinter@56K Soft PCI (V.92/V.90), chipset CX11252-11 (Conexant)). For Internet connection I need to have installed port ltmdm ($FreeBSD: ports/comms/ltmdm/Makefile,v 1.21 2005/02/25 04:37:22 imp Exp $). Am I right? But in the compilation process I've got a message -------------------------------------------------------------------------- # make ===> ltmdm-1.4_13 is only for i386, and you are running amd64. # -------------------------------------------------------------------------- I replaced string "ONLY_FOR_ARCHS = i386" with "ONLY_FOR_ARCHS = amd64" in Makefile. In this case in the compilation process I've got a message -------------------------------------------------------------------------- # make ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ************************************************* If your ISP supports K56flex protocol only and doesn't support V90, define WITH_595_OBJ. Otheriwse your modem will not connect ************************************************* ===> Extracting for ltmdm-1.4_13 => Checksum OK for ltmdm-1.4.tgz. ===> Patching for ltmdm-1.4_13 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ltmdm-1.4_13 ===> Configuring for ltmdm-1.4_13 ===> Building for ltmdm-1.4_13 Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/ports/comms/ltmdm/work/sys/modules/ltmdm @ -> /usr/src/sys machine -> /usr/src/sys/amd64/include awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.awk @/kern/bus_if.m -h awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.awk @/dev/pci/pci_if.m -h awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.awk @/kern/device_if.m -h uudecode -p ltmdmobj.o cc -O -pipe -DLTMDMOBJ_VERSION=600 -DCDEV_MAJOR=228 -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /usr/ports/comms/ltmdm/work/sys/modules/ltmdm/../../dev/ltmdm/ltmdmsio.c ld -d -warn-common -r -d -o ltmdm.ko ltmdmobj.o ltmdmsio.o ld: Relocatable linking with relocations from format elf32-i386-freebsd (ltmdmobj.o) to format elf64-x86-64 (ltmdm.ko) is not supported *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/comms/ltmdm/work/sys/modules/ltmdm. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/comms/ltmdm. # -------------------------------------------------------------------------- What I need to do? Thanks, Nikolay. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 10:59:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D059E16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:59:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roth@droopy.unibe.ch) Received: from mailhub03.unibe.ch (mailhub03.unibe.ch [130.92.9.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B7D43D4C for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:59:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roth@droopy.unibe.ch) Received: from localhost (scanhub01.unibe.ch [130.92.254.65]) by mailhub03.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF711CA68; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:59:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailhub03.unibe.ch ([130.92.9.70]) by localhost (scanhub01.unibe.ch [130.92.254.65]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12335-17-50; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:59:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from asterix.unibe.ch (asterix.unibe.ch [130.92.64.4]) by mailhub03.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860D71C5BE; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:59:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from droopy.unibe.ch (droopy [130.92.64.20]) by asterix.unibe.ch (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6OAx7dB007162; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:59:07 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from roth@localhost) by droopy.unibe.ch (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id j6OAx26u001251; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:59:02 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:59:02 +0200 From: Tobias Roth To: Mike Meyer Message-ID: <20050724105902.GA1239@droopy.unibe.ch> References: <17122.39739.280305.366684@bhuda.mired.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17122.39739.280305.366684@bhuda.mired.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: Warning! Using Outlook is insecure and promotes virus distribution. Please use a different email client. X-Virus-checked: by University of Berne Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xemacs & emacs ports should tweak rc.conf. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:59:10 -0000 On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 03:32:11PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: > In working on a port of Pymacs, I found Mk/bsd.emacs.mk. It sets a lot > of useful variables based on the value of the EMACS_PORT_NAME > variable, and provides hooks to control adding emacs to the ports > various depends lists. [snip] While working at this, can you please look at ports/37596 and keep sem@ in the loop? I think he has specific ideas about how to fix things with emacs ports but (like all of us) not much time to do it. thanks, t. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 11:19:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEC016A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:19:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org) Received: from peedub.jennejohn.org (Ja965.j.pppool.de [85.74.169.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049DF43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:19:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org) Received: from jennejohn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.jennejohn.org (8.13.4/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j6OBJf1o003263; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:19:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org) Message-Id: <200507241119.j6OBJf1o003263@peedub.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.0.4 To: nkuzmin@list.ru In-Reply-To: Message from nkuzmin@list.ru> of "Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:13:07 +0400." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:19:40 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ltmdm X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:19:43 -0000 nkuzmin@list.ru writes: [snip] > uudecode -p > >ltmdmobj.o > cc -O -pipe -DLTMDMOBJ_VERSION=600 -DCDEV_MAJOR=228 -D_KERNEL -DKLD= > _MODULE > -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include > -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpm= > ath=387 > -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float > -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls > -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith > -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c > /usr/ports/comms/ltmdm/work/sys/modules/ltmdm/../../dev/ltmdm/ltmdmsio.c > ld -d -warn-common -r -d -o ltmdm.ko ltmdmobj.o ltmdmsio.o > ld: Relocatable linking with relocations from format elf32-i386-freebsd > (ltmdmobj.o) to format elf64-x86-64 (ltmdm.ko) is not supported > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/comms/ltmdm/work/sys/modules/ltmdm. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in > /usr/ports/comms/ltmdm. > # > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > - > > What I need to do? > I don't know this port, but I suspect that ltmdmobj.o is a 32-bit object. If that's the case then you're out of luck; there's no way to link a 32-bit object into a 64-bit binary AFAIK. --- Gary Jennejohn / garyjATjennejohnDOTorg gjATfreebsdDOTorg garyjATdenxDOTde From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 11:29:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2333B16A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:29:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from 62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es (62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es [62.15.213.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CC443D45; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:29:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) by 62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OBTKIX007692; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:29:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by redesjm.local (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OBTJ69057051; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:29:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:29:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507241329.19724.josemi@redesjm.local> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-7; AVE: 6.31.1.0; VDF: 6.31.1.0; host: antares.redesjm.local) Cc: re@freebsd.org Subject: Changes towards RELENG_6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:29:24 -0000 Hi, After a first sight on my notes, seems that some points can be take before RELENG_6 ports - bash I think we may switch to shell/bash (bash3) in pkg split and main ports (If any is still using bash2). - crdtools We're using two ports for this: sysutils/cdrtools sysutils/cdrtools-cjk Any objection about merge the -cjk patch (seems very mature) in cdrtools and use this as depend? - samba maybe time to switch to samba3 as the default samba port. I doubt about the quality of samba2 code maintenance. - afterstep I don't use this, but think this is a very old code path Maybe time to swith to afterstep-stable - mail servers I think we lost a sendmail package for disc2 Also have all servers build with sasl support 'out of the box'. - pop3/imap servers I'll glad to see courier-imap in disc2 if possible Also maildrop or - www apps (old disk 3) Anyone can take a look into this? The goal: have really the pieces for a apache13/apache 2 server with common pieces like php4/php5. - disc1 (pkg-split) Think about add very common and base ports to disc1 (still space) candidates: - archivers/unzip - devel/gmake - editors/vim-lite - emulators/mtools (WITHOUT_X11) - mail/mutt-lite - net/cvsup-without-gui - shells/bash - security/sudo - www/lynx thanks in advance, -- josemi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 12:00:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DEB16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:00:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: from relay02.mail.uk1.eechost.net (relay02.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78FE43D48 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:00:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: from [217.69.32.45] (helo=ukmail2.eechost.net) by relay02.mail.uk1.eechost.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Dwf9B-0007dW-Pb for ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:59:57 +0100 Received: from mail by ukmail2.eechost.net with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Dwf9F-0003nr-GB for ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:00:01 +0100 From: spamblocked@tbdata.com To: ports@freebsd.org Auto-Submitted: auto-replied Message-Id: Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:00:01 +0100 X-Auth-Info: () Cc: Subject: Autoresponse: Mail Delivery (failure spamblocked@tbdata.com) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:00:04 -0000 Hello Thank you for contacting me. Unfortunately, this alias is only used for usenet postings and I'm afraid replies to it are not monitored. In fact after responding with this message, the robot carefully files all replies in a black hole. If you wish to discuss an issue which is on-topic for the group then a reply to the relevant post is probably your best course of action. However if you wish to talk about an unrelated or confidential matter then please use the contact form at http://WilliamTasso.com The net is a scary place, please be careful with your mail address and those entrusted to you by your correspondents. All the best. -- William Tasso From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 13:09:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCEF16A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:09:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from 62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es (62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es [62.15.213.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D06243D45; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:09:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) by 62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OD9jkD020063; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:09:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by redesjm.local (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OD9jZL064190; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:09:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: oliver@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:09:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507241509.44752.josemi@redesjm.local> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-7; AVE: 6.31.1.0; VDF: 6.31.1.0; host: antares.redesjm.local) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: security/courier-authlib and courier user X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:09:49 -0000 Hi, After using courier-authlib with maildrop (from sendmail) and courier-imap, I can't see any reason to have a courier user. This seems more a need of the courier mailer, and maybe of the tarball build/install system (I doubt). So, I'm thinking about the convenience of don't do any courier user work and do a rcNg for the courier mailer that fire-up all the components (and not use courier-authlib rcNG for courier mailer). I think the courier user only matters to the courier mailer. Any comments on this are welcome. -- josemi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 13:29:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8E416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:29:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oliver@FreeBSD.org) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [83.136.81.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4452B43D55 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:29:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oliver@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 76787 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2005 13:29:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kartoffel.salatschuessel.net) (83.136.81.185) by avocado.salatschuessel.net with SMTP; 24 Jul 2005 13:29:05 -0000 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:29:08 +0200 From: Oliver Lehmann To: Jose M Rodriguez Message-Id: <20050724152908.542dc3e8.oliver@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200507241509.44752.josemi@redesjm.local> References: <200507241509.44752.josemi@redesjm.local> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0rc (GTK+ 2.6.8; amd64-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, yds@CoolRat.org Subject: Re: security/courier-authlib and courier user X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:29:12 -0000 Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > Hi, > > After using courier-authlib with maildrop (from sendmail) and > courier-imap, I can't see any reason to have a courier user. > > This seems more a need of the courier mailer, and maybe of the tarball > build/install system (I doubt). > > So, I'm thinking about the convenience of don't do any courier user work > and do a rcNg for the courier mailer that fire-up all the components > (and not use courier-authlib rcNG for courier mailer). I think the > courier user only matters to the courier mailer. > "For the Courier mail server, /var/run/courier/authdaemon should be owned by the userid that Courier is installed under, and it must be readable and writable by the Courier user and group (but no world permissions)." How can I do this if I don't create the courier user with courier-authlib? -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 13:41:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BAE16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robbak@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63F243D53 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:41:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robbak@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i13so837115wra for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:41:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=svAYcDXQXG2SL8pscoXCuOvX9vOJ2jhb517MOVhOMP+TnQsvmq5xU2hBYLm02eNtcXfJrl0/ZXI+aDE1e1PeJtRIKbyvU0HUkBH6R+pvG7f1zQuquia6bYV9ZU/eXJPgcVYwkSlbNhJwO0Kw846+pXu4iXppFrpqI9a8dVY7KE8= Received: by 10.54.47.59 with SMTP id u59mr1850200wru; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.128.12 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:41:55 +1000 From: Robert Backhaus To: gerald@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Could we have a progrss report on the latest wine snapshot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Robert Backhaus List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:41:57 -0000 Hi! No wanting to bug you, but could we have a status report on how wine support is going? It is something I do use, and want to use more, as it improves. It's now 4 weeks since the June snapshot, and we'd like to at least know if there is a hold-up. Of course, if you are working on fixing underlying structures so that it works better in future.. Thank You! Please keep up the good work! Also, is there anything us non- and lesser-programming users can do to help= ? We really appreciate your hard work. Thanks! Robert. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:25:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEB116A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:25:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com (mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D187A43D46; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:25:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd22.aul.t-online.de by mailout09.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1DwhPc-0004Xb-02; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:25:04 +0200 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (bLKyEMZdQemxmLb5zhldGN5cgcVm-gI6-fATmSz+B9Sp95tuqwD2sN@[84.165.220.57]) by fwd22.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1DwhPW-1TkpnM0; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:24:58 +0200 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OEOuSP054621; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:24:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:24:56 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Jose M Rodriguez Message-ID: <20050724162456.4f839921@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200507241329.19724.josemi@redesjm.local> References: <200507241329.19724.josemi@redesjm.local> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: bLKyEMZdQemxmLb5zhldGN5cgcVm-gI6-fATmSz+B9Sp95tuqwD2sN@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: a34f8ade-e12f-4b42-8c7c-b670a5a41297 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changes towards RELENG_6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:25:06 -0000 On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:29:19 +0200 Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > - crdtools > We're using two ports for this: > sysutils/cdrtools > sysutils/cdrtools-cjk > > Any objection about merge the -cjk patch (seems very mature) in > cdrtools and use this as depend? The author refuses to provide support for patched cdrtools packages. Marius didn't included the cjk patches on purpose because of this. Bye, Alexander. -- If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed... ...Oh, wait a minute, he already does. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:33:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B3016A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:33:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from 62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es (62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es [62.15.213.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A5F43D49; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:33:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) by 62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OEXMZo014179; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:33:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by redesjm.local (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OEXMqG064590; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:33:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: Alexander Leidinger Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:33:21 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507241329.19724.josemi@redesjm.local> <20050724162456.4f839921@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20050724162456.4f839921@Magellan.Leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507241633.22342.josemi@redesjm.local> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-7; AVE: 6.31.1.0; VDF: 6.31.1.0; host: antares.redesjm.local) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org, Jose M Rodriguez Subject: Re: Changes towards RELENG_6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:33:32 -0000 El Domingo, 24 de Julio de 2005 16:24, Alexander Leidinger escribi=F3: > On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:29:19 +0200 > > Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > > - crdtools > > We're using two ports for this: > > sysutils/cdrtools > > sysutils/cdrtools-cjk > > > > Any objection about merge the -cjk patch (seems very mature) in > > cdrtools and use this as depend? > > The author refuses to provide support for patched cdrtools packages. > Marius didn't included the cjk patches on purpose because of this. > And what about on depends by default on sysutils/cdrtools-cjk. At last,=20 gnome do this (while the rest of the ports I touch uses=20 sysutils/cdrtools). The actual layout may send you to one or other package as you install=20 gnome first or last. =2D- josemi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 14:44:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729BA16A420; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:44:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from 62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es (62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es [62.15.213.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5474E43D46; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:44:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) by 62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OEiG4D014248; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:44:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by redesjm.local (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OEiFpG064670; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:44:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: Oliver Lehmann Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:44:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507241509.44752.josemi@redesjm.local> <20050724152908.542dc3e8.oliver@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20050724152908.542dc3e8.oliver@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507241644.15692.josemi@redesjm.local> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-7; AVE: 6.31.1.0; VDF: 6.31.1.0; host: antares.redesjm.local) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Jose M Rodriguez Subject: Re: security/courier-authlib and courier user X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:44:24 -0000 El Domingo, 24 de Julio de 2005 15:29, Oliver Lehmann escribi=F3: > Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After using courier-authlib with maildrop (from sendmail) and > > courier-imap, I can't see any reason to have a courier user. > > > > This seems more a need of the courier mailer, and maybe of the > > tarball build/install system (I doubt). > > > > So, I'm thinking about the convenience of don't do any courier user > > work and do a rcNg for the courier mailer that fire-up all the > > components (and not use courier-authlib rcNG for courier mailer).=20 > > I think the courier user only matters to the courier mailer. > > "For the Courier mail server, /var/run/courier/authdaemon should be > owned by the userid that Courier is installed under, and it must be > readable and writable by the Courier user and group (but no world > permissions)." > > How can I do this if I don't create the courier user with > courier-authlib? =46irst, this needs test, but I think that the real problem is=20 using /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond.sh with courier mailer. I think courier mailer users must maintain courier_authdaemond_enable to=20 NO and embed /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond.sh functonality in=20 its own rc script. This have more sense with the closed concept of the courier mailer. Also thinking in support ${courier_authdaemond_user:=3Droot}=20 in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond.sh =2D- josemi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:03:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E2416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:03:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stas.yakovlev@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C5B43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:03:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stas.yakovlev@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so270990rne for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:03:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=R+mshcVUcN//c0Ckv1M7j/+q6bKbpH4UIYGXf3ntxdJ5yyZmamfrrNauzwG3mQM/1EXfdkrURlkF/JLvxAXE034AFX522k/rpqrQo3+k3uFIL+Y8Hrd/Tzj4TPnXuLbwatwxx3ou5kMsO5QIlAiM/RqfsA7bNL/a7LKoyJasKh8= Received: by 10.39.3.5 with SMTP id f5mr1073448rni; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.208.42 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:03:13 +0000 From: Stas Yakovlev To: ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Upgrade net/libnet & net/libnet-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stas Yakovlev List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:03:17 -0000 Hi. Goal: Upgrade net/libnet & net/libnet-devel for current versions. Problems: API from versions in ports and current version differ, so=20 packages which are based on libnet and now compiled successfully,will f= ail to compile afterwards. So this packages (~40) need be updated too.=20 I'm ready to do all the work, but I need someone who will commit all these patches to ports at once. You should also check my way of porting to be correct. Details: Project page: http://www.packetfactory.net/projects/libnet=20 Existing versions (from developer) 1.0.2a Deprecated 1.0.x Tree (unsupported) 1.1.2.1 Latest Stable Version 1.1.3 Latest Beta Version Current status in ports 1.0.2a net/libnet 1.1.2.1 net/libnet-devel=20 There's no backward compatibility between Versions 1.0.2a and 1.1.2.1. Solution: first copy net/libnet to net/libnet10 update all ports which depend on net/libnet (1.0.2a) to become depended on net/libnet10 remove net/libnet copy net/libnet-devel (1.1.2.1) to net/libnet update all ports which depend on net/libnet-devel (1.1.2.1) to become depended on net/libnet update net/libnet-devel from version 1.1.2.1 to 1.1.3.1 Status in ports at the end=20 1.0.2a net/libnet10 1.1.2.1 net/libnet 1.1.3 net/libnet-devel=20 If you have a better idea or any questions, e-mail me. Stanislav. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:05:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AEE16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:05:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm-dated-1123081563.24f089@mired.org) Received: from iimail.mindsync.com (internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3086E43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:05:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm-dated-1123081563.24f089@mired.org) Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by iimail.mindsync.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7FA3FA75 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mired.org (mwm@idiom [216.240.32.1]) by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j6OF5aaG087147 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:05:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mwm-dated-1123081563.24f089@mired.org) Received: (qmail 2161 invoked by uid 1001); 24 Jul 2005 15:06:03 -0000 Received: by localhost.mired.org (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1001); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:06:03 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17123.44634.790191.549056@bhuda.mired.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:06:02 -0400 To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050724032900.GA24567@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <17123.1272.243457.460650@bhuda.mired.org> <20050724032900.GA24567@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid X-Primary-Address: mwm@mired.org X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`; h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: Mike Meyer Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recursive dependency? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:05:44 -0000 In <20050724032900.GA24567@xor.obsecurity.org>, Kris Kennaway typed: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 11:03:20PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: > > I get the following in /usr/ports/editors/xemacs: > > > > bhuda% make package-depends-list > > make: Max recursion level (500) exceeded.: Resource temporarily unavailable > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/xemacs. > This is usually because you specified an illegal USE_* option in the > make environment, but perhaps someone committed a mistake. Got it - because someone pointed out a bug in another thread. I'm tripping over ports/37596. Thanks, http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 15:52:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5576916A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:52:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1855A43D45; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:52:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 8AC4529B1; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:52:26 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:52:25 -0500 To: Mike Meyer Message-ID: <20050724155225.GA10448@soaustin.net> References: <17123.1272.243457.460650@bhuda.mired.org> <20050724032900.GA24567@xor.obsecurity.org> <17123.44634.790191.549056@bhuda.mired.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17123.44634.790191.549056@bhuda.mired.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, sem@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Recursive dependency? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:52:27 -0000 On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 11:06:02AM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: > In <20050724032900.GA24567@xor.obsecurity.org>, Kris Kennaway typed: > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 11:03:20PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: > > > I get the following in /usr/ports/editors/xemacs: > > > > > > bhuda% make package-depends-list > > > make: Max recursion level (500) exceeded.: Resource temporarily unavailable > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/xemacs. > > This is usually because you specified an illegal USE_* option in the > > make environment, but perhaps someone committed a mistake. > > Got it - because someone pointed out a bug in another thread. > > I'm tripping over ports/37596. So does this mean that 37596 needs to be reopened? Sem? mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 18:38:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1E716A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:38:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2C043D48; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:38:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (flz@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OIcLw3052913; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:38:21 GMT (envelope-from flz@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from flz@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6OIcLCd052909; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:38:21 GMT (envelope-from flz) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:38:21 GMT From: Florent Thoumie Message-Id: <200507241838.j6OIcLCd052909@freefall.freebsd.org> To: flz@FreeBSD.org, flz@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/79235: [maintainer update] sysutils/dtc: v0.17.0.3 of Domain Technologie Control (DTC) web hosting control panel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:38:22 -0000 Synopsis: [maintainer update] sysutils/dtc: v0.17.0.3 of Domain Technologie Control (DTC) web hosting control panel Responsible-Changed-From-To: flz->freebsd-ports Responsible-Changed-By: flz Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 24 18:37:59 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Return to the pool, feedback has been received some time ago. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=79235 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 18:38:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151E016A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:38:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72FC43D48; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:38:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (flz@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OIct6h052996; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:38:55 GMT (envelope-from flz@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from flz@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6OIctkB052992; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:38:55 GMT (envelope-from flz) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:38:55 GMT From: Florent Thoumie Message-Id: <200507241838.j6OIctkB052992@freefall.freebsd.org> To: flz@FreeBSD.org, flz@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/81481: portmanage maybe fflush(3) before system(3) and isatty(3) before mod. xterm title X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:38:56 -0000 Synopsis: portmanage maybe fflush(3) before system(3) and isatty(3) before mod. xterm title Responsible-Changed-From-To: flz->freebsd-ports Responsible-Changed-By: flz Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 24 18:38:35 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Return to the pool. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=81481 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 18:39:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1923F16A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:39:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B9443D48; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:39:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (flz@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OIdFA1053065; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:39:15 GMT (envelope-from flz@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from flz@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6OIdFX4053061; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:39:15 GMT (envelope-from flz) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:39:15 GMT From: Florent Thoumie Message-Id: <200507241839.j6OIdFX4053061@freefall.freebsd.org> To: flz@FreeBSD.org, flz@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/83455: [MAINTAINER] security/openct: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:39:16 -0000 Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] security/openct: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES] Responsible-Changed-From-To: flz->freebsd-ports Responsible-Changed-By: flz Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 24 18:39:05 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Return to the pool. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=83455 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 18:43:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AB116A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:43:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yds@CoolRat.org) Received: from dppl.com (sapas.dppl.biz [216.182.10.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136D543D48; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:43:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yds@CoolRat.org) Received: from [192.168.1.69] (pcp0011284575pcs.union01.nj.comcast.net [69.248.144.22]) (AUTH: PLAIN yds, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by dppl.com with esmtp; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:43:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:43:27 -0400 From: Yarema To: Jose M Rodriguez , Oliver Lehmann Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200507241644.15692.josemi@redesjm.local> References: <200507241509.44752.josemi@redesjm.local> <20050724152908.542dc3e8.oliver@FreeBSD.org> <200507241644.15692.josemi@redesjm.local> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/courier-authlib and courier user X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:43:31 -0000 --On Sunday, July 24, 2005 16:44:14 +0200 Jose M Rodriguez=20 wrote: > El Domingo, 24 de Julio de 2005 15:29, Oliver Lehmann escribi=F3: >> Jose M Rodriguez wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > After using courier-authlib with maildrop (from sendmail) and >> > courier-imap, I can't see any reason to have a courier user. >> > >> > This seems more a need of the courier mailer, and maybe of the >> > tarball build/install system (I doubt). >> > >> > So, I'm thinking about the convenience of don't do any courier user >> > work and do a rcNg for the courier mailer that fire-up all the >> > components (and not use courier-authlib rcNG for courier mailer). >> > I think the courier user only matters to the courier mailer. >> >> "For the Courier mail server, /var/run/courier/authdaemon should be >> owned by the userid that Courier is installed under, and it must be >> readable and writable by the Courier user and group (but no world >> permissions)." >> >> How can I do this if I don't create the courier user with >> courier-authlib? > > First, this needs test, but I think that the real problem is > using /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond.sh with courier mailer. > > I think courier mailer users must maintain courier_authdaemond_enable to > NO and embed /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond.sh functonality in > its own rc script. > > This have more sense with the closed concept of the courier mailer. > > Also thinking in support ${courier_authdaemond_user:=3Droot} > in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond.sh > > -- > josemi First let me quote the relevent portion of=20 http://www.Courier-MTA.org/authlib/INSTALL.html then I'll add my thoughts=20 on this. --with-mailuser=3Duserid, --with-mailgroup=3Dgroupid "userid" is a reserved system username, "groupid" is a reserved system groupname. These two options should be used before installing Courier = for the first time. These options are not required before installing Courier-IMAP or SqWebMail. These options specify the user/group that will own the configuration files, and the socket that authentication daemon process listens on. = This is a key part of Courier's security model. These options should not be necessary if upgrading from an earlier=20 version of Courier and/or this authentication library. The default userid and groupid are computed as follows: * If an earlier version of the Courier authentication library is=20 already installed in the same directory, the userid and the groupid is the same as the earlier version, otherwise: * If an earlier version of the Courier package is installed (only the Courier package, the Courier-IMAP and SqWebMail packages do not = carry this information), the userid and the groupid is the same as the = ones used to configure Courier, otherwise: * The userid is the first userid from the following list which exists=20 in the system: courier, daemon, adm, bin, root; and the groupid is the first groupid from the following list which exists in the system: courier, daemon, adm, sys, root. When installing Courier authentication library for the first time, it is highly recommended to create a "courier" userid and groupid, so that specifying these options will not be necessary. In the all inclusive courier MTA having the courier-authlib config files=20 owned by UID/GID "courier" allows the webadmin CGI to be used to administer = all things courier including courier-authlib. But more importantly having=20 user "courier" improves security by sandboxing the daemons into running=20 under a UID/GID not used by anything else. Yes, according to the docs=20 above we could use user "daemon" or any number of other pre-existing UIDs.=20 But that goes against the thinking of current security practice that having = daemons with any security implications run under a sandbox UID/GID is a=20 Good Thing. I mean, the OpenBSD folks go to great lengths to include=20 privilege separation into everything they run just in case there might be a = vulnerability which could wreak havoc if the daemon was running with root=20 privileges. Also look at how the functionally closest package to=20 courier-authlib does things: cyrus-sasl installs and uses UID/GID cyrus.=20 And again the main reason is sandboxing or privilege separation if you = will. I considered this when I first presented Oliver with the courier-authlib=20 patches including UID/GID "courier". My thinking at the time was that it=20 might be even better if we actually had another sandbox UID/GID like=20 "authlib" for instance. The only thing that breaks is courier MTA's=20 webadmin CGI. What it gains us is more finegrained privilege separation=20 where courier MTA would run as user "courier" and courier-authlib would run = as user "authlib" and the two would not be able to corrupt each other in=20 case of a vulnerability in either one of them. As for the other courier=20 packages like SqWebMail and courier-imap -- they don't need courier-authlib = to run as user "courier" per se, but running courier-authlib under a=20 UID/GID not used by anything else does benefit security regardless if that=20 UID is "courier" or "authlib" or "sasl" or "auth" or whatever else. I was=20 actually thinking that it wouldn't be such a bad idea if we had a UID/GID=20 such as "sasl" or "auth" which could be shared by a number of packages=20 which functionally do similar things like cyrus-sasl and courier-authlib.=20 If cyrus-sasl ran under user "sasl" so could courier-authlib. Look at how=20 user "www" is used. Apache uses it and so can any of the other http=20 servers. So why not have an "auth" UID reserved for packages like=20 cyrus-sasl and courier-authlib? So to sum up a) running courier-authlib under a UID not used by anything=20 else is a Good Thing for security. b) Having that UID be "courier" makes it = play nice with courier MTA's webadmin and kills two birds with one stone in = having only one UID to manage for both packages. c) Having the courier MTA = package maintain user "courier" and having courier-authlib use a different=20 UID is an option which would break webadmin but gain even more finegrained=20 privilege separation. d) Have courier-authlib run as "root" is a Bad Thing = from a security viewpoint. Them are my thoughts on this.. --=20 Yarema http://yds.CoolRat.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 18:44:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78FA16A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:44:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roth@droopy.unibe.ch) Received: from mailhub03.unibe.ch (mailhub03.unibe.ch [130.92.9.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F6743D46; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:44:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roth@droopy.unibe.ch) Received: from localhost (scanhub02-eth0.unibe.ch [130.92.254.66]) by mailhub03.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9E41CFD1; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:44:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailhub03.unibe.ch ([130.92.9.70]) by localhost (scanhub02.unibe.ch [130.92.254.66]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05185-05-29; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:44:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from asterix.unibe.ch (asterix.unibe.ch [130.92.64.4]) by mailhub03.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570771CFF5; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:44:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from droopy.unibe.ch (droopy [130.92.64.20]) by asterix.unibe.ch (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6OIijdB018146; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:44:45 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from roth@localhost) by droopy.unibe.ch (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id j6OIii16002730; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:44:44 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:44:44 +0200 From: Tobias Roth To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20050724184444.GA2527@droopy.unibe.ch> References: <17123.1272.243457.460650@bhuda.mired.org> <20050724032900.GA24567@xor.obsecurity.org> <17123.44634.790191.549056@bhuda.mired.org> <20050724155225.GA10448@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050724155225.GA10448@soaustin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: Warning! Using Outlook is insecure and promotes virus distribution. Please use a different email client. X-Virus-checked: by University of Berne Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway , Mike Meyer , sem@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recursive dependency? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:44:48 -0000 On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:52:25AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 11:06:02AM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: > > In <20050724032900.GA24567@xor.obsecurity.org>, Kris Kennaway typed: > > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 11:03:20PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: > > > > I get the following in /usr/ports/editors/xemacs: > > > > > > > > bhuda% make package-depends-list > > > > make: Max recursion level (500) exceeded.: Resource temporarily unavailable > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/xemacs. > > > This is usually because you specified an illegal USE_* option in the > > > make environment, but perhaps someone committed a mistake. > > > > Got it - because someone pointed out a bug in another thread. > > > > I'm tripping over ports/37596. > > So does this mean that 37596 needs to be reopened? Sem? 'Someone' was me, and I can confirm that 37596 still is a problem as of today with -STABLE. That's why I pointed Mike to it and asked him to keep sem@ in the loop. Greets, t. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 18:46:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D2716A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D6F43D48; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (flz@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OIkDrS053393; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:13 GMT (envelope-from flz@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from flz@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6OIkDuS053389; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:13 GMT (envelope-from flz) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:13 GMT From: Florent Thoumie Message-Id: <200507241846.j6OIkDuS053389@freefall.freebsd.org> To: flz@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/83455: [MAINTAINER] security/openct: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:13 -0000 Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] security/openct: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES] Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: flz Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 24 18:45:57 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Refile. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=83455 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 18:46:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7292216A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320DD43D48; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (flz@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OIkXcc053438; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:33 GMT (envelope-from flz@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from flz@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6OIkXnO053434; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:33 GMT (envelope-from flz) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:33 GMT From: Florent Thoumie Message-Id: <200507241846.j6OIkXnO053434@freefall.freebsd.org> To: flz@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/81481: portmanage maybe fflush(3) before system(3) and isatty(3) before mod. xterm title X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:33 -0000 Synopsis: portmanage maybe fflush(3) before system(3) and isatty(3) before mod. xterm title Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: flz Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 24 18:46:20 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Refile. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=81481 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 18:46:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9466816A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F0F43D46; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (flz@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OIkrde053483; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:53 GMT (envelope-from flz@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from flz@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6OIkrpw053479; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:53 GMT (envelope-from flz) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:53 GMT From: Florent Thoumie Message-Id: <200507241846.j6OIkrpw053479@freefall.freebsd.org> To: flz@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/79235: [maintainer update] sysutils/dtc: v0.17.0.3 of Domain Technologie Control (DTC) web hosting control panel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:46:53 -0000 Synopsis: [maintainer update] sysutils/dtc: v0.17.0.3 of Domain Technologie Control (DTC) web hosting control panel Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: flz Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 24 18:46:41 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Refile. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=79235 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 19:37:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6905C16A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:37:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2726F43D45; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:37:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 1493229B1; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:37:26 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:37:26 -0500 To: Tobias Roth Message-ID: <20050724193726.GA11019@soaustin.net> References: <17123.1272.243457.460650@bhuda.mired.org> <20050724032900.GA24567@xor.obsecurity.org> <17123.44634.790191.549056@bhuda.mired.org> <20050724155225.GA10448@soaustin.net> <20050724184444.GA2527@droopy.unibe.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050724184444.GA2527@droopy.unibe.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon , Kris Kennaway , Mike Meyer , sem@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recursive dependency? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:37:28 -0000 On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 08:44:44PM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote: > > So does this mean that 37596 needs to be reopened? Sem? > > 'Someone' was me, and I can confirm that 37596 still is a problem > as of today with -STABLE. That's why I pointed Mike to it and asked > him to keep sem@ in the loop. OK, as bugmeister I'm going to reopen it and mark it as 'suspended' while the fix is being worked on, because it's my belief that that's the way it should have been set in the first place. I'm quite aggressive in closing PRs ... when it's clear the problem has been fixed or the circumstances no longer relevant, but that doesn't sound like the case here. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 20:05:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AA416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:05:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ismail@istanbul.enderunix.org) Received: from istanbul.enderunix.org (freefall.marmara.edu.tr [193.140.143.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EFE8043D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:05:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ismail@istanbul.enderunix.org) Received: (qmail 42820 invoked by uid 1003); 24 Jul 2005 20:05:14 -0000 X-Mail-Scanner: Scanned by qSheff 1.0-r1 (http://www.enderunix.org/qsheff/) Message-ID: <20050724200514.42816.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> From: "Ismail YENIGUL" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:05:14 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: new category request : "turkish" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:05:02 -0000 Dear All, I want to propose new category called "turkish" on port tree for the ports that support Turkish language. Best Regards Ismail YENIGUL www.EnderUNIX.org ---- Atalet Mülkün Pasýdýr! Ýnsan için ancak çalýþtýðý vardýr! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 20:06:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B297716A41F; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:06:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from 62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es (62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es [62.15.213.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EF343D48; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) by 62-15-213-209.inversas.jazztel.es (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6OK62gQ044778; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:06:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by redesjm.local (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6OK62P3050002; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:06:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: Yarema Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:06:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507241509.44752.josemi@redesjm.local> <200507241644.15692.josemi@redesjm.local> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507242206.02218.josemi@redesjm.local> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-7; AVE: 6.31.1.0; VDF: 6.31.1.0; host: antares.redesjm.local) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Oliver Lehmann Subject: Re: security/courier-authlib and courier user X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:06:12 -0000 El Domingo, 24 de Julio de 2005 20:43, Yarema escribi=F3: > --On Sunday, July 24, 2005 16:44:14 +0200 Jose M Rodriguez > > wrote: > > El Domingo, 24 de Julio de 2005 15:29, Oliver Lehmann escribi=F3: > >> Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > After using courier-authlib with maildrop (from sendmail) and > >> > courier-imap, I can't see any reason to have a courier user. > >> > > >> > This seems more a need of the courier mailer, and maybe of the > >> > tarball build/install system (I doubt). > >> > > >> > So, I'm thinking about the convenience of don't do any courier > >> > user work and do a rcNg for the courier mailer that fire-up all > >> > the components (and not use courier-authlib rcNG for courier > >> > mailer). I think the courier user only matters to the courier > >> > mailer. > >> > >> "For the Courier mail server, /var/run/courier/authdaemon should > >> be owned by the userid that Courier is installed under, and it > >> must be readable and writable by the Courier user and group (but > >> no world permissions)." > >> > >> How can I do this if I don't create the courier user with > >> courier-authlib? > > > > First, this needs test, but I think that the real problem is > > using /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond.sh with courier > > mailer. > > > > I think courier mailer users must maintain > > courier_authdaemond_enable to NO and embed > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond.sh functonality in its own > > rc script. > > > > This have more sense with the closed concept of the courier mailer. > > > > Also thinking in support ${courier_authdaemond_user:=3Droot} > > in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond.sh > > > > -- > > josemi > > First let me quote the relevent portion of > http://www.Courier-MTA.org/authlib/INSTALL.html then I'll add my > thoughts on this. > > In the all inclusive courier MTA having the courier-authlib config > files owned by UID/GID "courier" allows the webadmin CGI to be used > to administer all things courier including courier-authlib. But more > importantly having user "courier" improves security by sandboxing > the daemons into running under a UID/GID not used by anything else.=20 > Yes, according to the docs above we could use user "daemon" or any > number of other pre-existing UIDs. But that goes against the thinking > of current security practice that having daemons with any security > implications run under a sandbox UID/GID is a Good Thing. I mean, > the OpenBSD folks go to great lengths to include privilege separation > into everything they run just in case there might be a vulnerability > which could wreak havoc if the daemon was running with root > privileges. Also look at how the functionally closest package to > courier-authlib does things: cyrus-sasl installs and uses UID/GID > cyrus. And again the main reason is sandboxing or privilege > separation if you will. config (${PREFIX}/etc) owned by courier seems a good point to maintain=20 things as used now. =2D- josemi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 21:42:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6976C16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:42:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ADC43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:42:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from [128.131.111.48] (pulcherrima [128.131.111.48]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64735137E8; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:42:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Robert Backhaus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Could we have a progrss report on the latest wine snapshot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:42:06 -0000 On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Robert Backhaus wrote: > No wanting to bug you, but could we have a status report on how wine > support is going? It is something I do use, and want to use more, as > it improves. It's now 4 weeks since the June snapshot, and we'd like > to at least know if there is a hold-up. The June snapshot failed to build on FreeBSD. Due to reports and patches by yours truely this has been addressed for current Wine sources. There have been other, relatively significant changes for that snapshot of Wine which I believe need some shaking out, so I decided to wait for the next snapshot (probably due every day now) of Wine before updating the port again. Things seem to build just fine these days, after some fixes as late as last week, and I've seen one specific patch intended to improve the interaction between Wine and FreeBSD's memory management, so things seem to be back on track and proceed nicely. > Also, is there anything us non- and lesser-programming users can do to > help? Right now, I'm afraid there isn't much that I'm aware of, except testing things and reporting problems upstream (at http://www.winehq.com), though this may not help much, if at all, as far as FreeBSD-specific issues are affected. :-( Gerald From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 22:57:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381CA16A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:57:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D28443D46 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:57:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2005 22:57:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) [129.187.19.157] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 00:57:12 +0200 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C3DA3C1EA; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:57:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:57:48 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Ismail YENIGUL Message-ID: <20050724225748.GF1943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20050724200514.42816.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xJK8B5Wah2CMJs8h" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050724200514.42816.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new category request : "turkish" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:57:14 -0000 --xJK8B5Wah2CMJs8h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I want to propose new category called "turkish" on port tree for the port= s=20 > that support Turkish language.=20 Please compile a list of ports that should go into that new category: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-= categories.html#PROPOSING-CATEGORIES Simon --xJK8B5Wah2CMJs8h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC5BzsCkn+/eutqCoRAs3qAJwO/nXc9iIqYBtWugiSuI9l1NOjcgCeNuv8 LJPx/o3AqsLItfG0wvsqGMc= =zCop -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xJK8B5Wah2CMJs8h-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 01:31:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A0916A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 01:31:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from mail3out.barnet.com.au (mail3out.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD50843D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 01:31:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by mail3out.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 27) id 28926877D7A; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:31:07 +1000 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <42E440DB000183DD591F92@BarNet> Received: from mail3-auth.barnet.com.au (mail3.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.barnet.com.au", Issuer "BarNet Root Certificate Authority" (verified OK)) by mail3.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01249877D6D; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:31:07 +1000 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (edwin-3.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "edwin.adsl.barnet.com.au", Issuer "BarNet Root Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mail3-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E396877D6B; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:31:06 +1000 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B9B0F64A1; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:31:04 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:31:04 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Jeremie Le Hen Message-ID: <20050725013104.GM1230@k7.mavetju> References: <20050722150032.GP39292@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <1122050545.97024.2.camel@cream.xbsd.org> <20050722173215.GR39292@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <1122054396.97024.7.camel@cream.xbsd.org> <20050722175156.GT39292@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050722175156.GT39292@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Florent Thoumie Subject: Re: ngrep and libpcap from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 01:31:08 -0000 On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 07:51:56PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Florent, > > > Still won't work for you (or people who have libpcap installed > > from ports and doesn't have WITH_PORTS_LIBPCAP). > > > > Something like this would be more appropriate : > > > > .if !defined(WITH_PORTS_LIBPCAP) > > # Default behavior > > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-pcap-includes=/usr/include > > .else > > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-pcap-includes=${PREFIX}/include > > LIB_DEPENDS= pcap.2:${PORTSDIR}/net/libpcap > > .endif > > Yes, of course. Shame on me :-). I tested both this time, it's OK. > Thanks for your patience. I have commited this patch. Thanks for your work! Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 02:36:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53CF16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E34BE43D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:36:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 17612 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 02:36:54 -0000 Received: from maxwell6.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.212) by smtpgate1 with SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 02:36:53 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([210.24.246.110]) by maxwell6.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20050725023653.OFYD1233.maxwell6.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.107]>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:36:53 +0800 Message-ID: <42E45008.3080100@pacific.net.sg> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:35:52 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050514) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ismail YENIGUL References: <20050724200514.42816.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> In-Reply-To: <20050724200514.42816.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new category request : "turkish" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:36:58 -0000 Hi, Ismail YENIGUL wrote: > > Dear All, > I want to propose new category called "turkish" on port tree for the > ports that support Turkish language. The ports tree will become flooded if FreeBSD continues with every langauge in the root of the tree. I would create a new entry 'langauges' in which all natural langauges get their entries. This leaves the root of the ports tree pretty clean and every langauge can get its own section. Erich From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 03:48:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CD116A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:48:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from mail.rdu.kirov.ru (ns.rdu.kirov.ru [217.9.151.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A3F43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:48:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from kirov.so-cdu.ru (kirov [172.21.81.1]) by mail.rdu.kirov.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A8AFE73; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:48:41 +0400 (MSD) Received: from kirov.so-cdu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rdu.kirov.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id A50C015C1F; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:48:41 +0400 (MSD) Received: by rdu.kirov.ru (Postfix, from userid 1014) id 13BD915C2E; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:48:41 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [172.21.81.52] (elsukov.kirov.so-cdu.ru [172.21.81.52]) by rdu.kirov.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA8B15389; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:48:40 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <42E46118.3000105@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:48:40 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060202070408080602070306" Cc: esk@ira.uka.de Subject: xmms recode patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:48:46 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060202070408080602070306 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! I have make a patch to multimedia/xmms with new version of csa recode patch. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --------------060202070408080602070306 Content-Type: text/plain; name="multimedia-xmms.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="multimedia-xmms.patch" diff -burN xmms.orig/Makefile xmms/Makefile --- xmms.orig/Makefile Thu Apr 21 20:13:54 2005 +++ xmms/Makefile Sat Jul 23 17:35:47 2005 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= xmms PORTVERSION= 1.2.10 -PORTREVISION= 4 +PORTREVISION= 5 CATEGORIES+= multimedia audio ipv6 MASTER_SITES= http://www.xmms.org/files/1.2.x/ \ ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/multimedia/xmms/1.2.x/ @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-ipv6 .if defined(WITH_ENCODING_PATCH) || defined(WITH_ID3V2_PATCH) -ENC_PATCHLEVEL= 27.4 +ENC_PATCHLEVEL= 28 DISTFILES+= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}-recode-csa${ENC_PATCHLEVEL}${EXTRACT_SUFX}:enc MASTER_SITES+= ${MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE:S/$/:enc/} MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR+= rusxmms/:enc @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ @${ECHO_MSG} .endif -post-patch: +post-extract: .if defined(WITH_ID3V2_PATCH) @${PATCH} -s -p1 -d ${WRKSRC} < ${WRKDIR}/recode.3rdparty/id3v2.patch .endif diff -burN xmms.orig/distinfo xmms/distinfo --- xmms.orig/distinfo Tue Nov 2 19:28:29 2004 +++ xmms/distinfo Sat Jul 23 12:07:48 2005 @@ -1,8 +1,4 @@ -SHA1 (xmms-1.2.10.tar.bz2) = a3c3d3756d5263183c27b3c50a7f5404cba8bfaf -RMD160 (xmms-1.2.10.tar.bz2) = 0360cbb8c326b3325bd8ebb3343c69a9788d7084 MD5 (xmms-1.2.10.tar.bz2) = 03a85cfc5e1877a2e1f7be4fa1d3f63c SIZE (xmms-1.2.10.tar.bz2) = 2418265 -SHA1 (xmms-1.2.10-recode-csa27.4.tar.bz2) = 342448386ebad1f1700df8816411acb739845203 -RMD160 (xmms-1.2.10-recode-csa27.4.tar.bz2) = 40cf6b8fae111ff11e390760bdeb7e4a6f57b8a4 -MD5 (xmms-1.2.10-recode-csa27.4.tar.bz2) = f782cd4251fb36c23519b3b6d2552156 -SIZE (xmms-1.2.10-recode-csa27.4.tar.bz2) = 281388 +MD5 (xmms-1.2.10-recode-csa28.tar.bz2) = aa1f14162ff219f5088e4869b1f7b5e7 +SIZE (xmms-1.2.10-recode-csa28.tar.bz2) = 281682 diff -burN xmms.orig/files/patch-strnlen xmms/files/patch-strnlen --- xmms.orig/files/patch-strnlen Thu Jan 1 03:00:00 1970 +++ xmms/files/patch-strnlen Sat Jul 23 18:26:42 2005 @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +--- libxmms/strnlen.h Sat Jul 23 17:41:41 2005 ++++ libxmms/strnlen.h Sat Jul 23 17:41:35 2005 +@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ ++#ifdef __FreeBSD__ ++#include ++ ++size_t strnlen(const char* s, size_t n) ++{ ++ size_t i = 0; ++ while(i < n && s[i] != 0)i++; ++ return i; ++} ++#endif +--- libxmms/charset.c.orig Sat Jul 23 17:43:00 2005 ++++ libxmms/charset.c Sat Jul 23 17:43:22 2005 +@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ + #endif + */ + ++#include "strnlen.h" + #include "charset.h" + #include "charset_config.h" + +--- libxmms/Makefile.am.orig Sat Jul 23 18:23:44 2005 ++++ libxmms/Makefile.am Sat Jul 23 18:24:19 2005 +@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ + formatter.c formatter.h \ + titlestring.c titlestring.h \ + xentry.c xentry.h \ +-xconvert.c xconvert.h \ ++xconvert.c xconvert.h strnlen.h \ + charset.c charset.h charset_auto_russian.h charset_config.h russian_table.h + +-xmmsinclude_HEADERS = configfile.h xmmsctrl.h dirbrowser.h util.h formatter.h titlestring.h charset.h charset_auto_russian.h russian_table.h ++xmmsinclude_HEADERS = configfile.h xmmsctrl.h dirbrowser.h util.h formatter.h titlestring.h charset.h charset_auto_russian.h russian_table.h strnlen.h + +--- libxmms/Makefile.in.orig Sat Jul 23 18:23:52 2005 ++++ libxmms/Makefile.in Sat Jul 23 18:25:09 2005 +@@ -145,13 +145,13 @@ + formatter.c formatter.h \ + titlestring.c titlestring.h \ + xentry.c xentry.h \ +-xconvert.c xconvert.h \ ++xconvert.c xconvert.h strnlen.h \ + charset.c charset.h charset_auto_russian.h charset_config.h russian_table.h + + + + xmmsinclude_HEADERS = configfile.h xmmsctrl.h dirbrowser.h util.h formatter.h titlestring.h \ +-charset.h charset_auto_russian.h charset_config.h russian_table.h ++charset.h charset_auto_russian.h charset_config.h russian_table.h strnlen.h + subdir = . + ACLOCAL_M4 = $(top_srcdir)/aclocal.m4 + mkinstalldirs = $(SHELL) $(top_srcdir)/../mkinstalldirs diff -burN xmms.orig/pkg-plist xmms/pkg-plist --- xmms.orig/pkg-plist Tue Nov 2 19:28:29 2004 +++ xmms/pkg-plist Sat Jul 23 18:27:22 2005 @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ bin/wmxmms bin/xmms bin/xmms-config +%%ENCODING%%include/xmms/strnlen.h %%ENCODING%%include/xmms/charset.h %%ENCODING%%include/xmms/charset_auto_russian.h %%ENCODING%%include/xmms/charset_config.h --------------060202070408080602070306-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 04:03:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DA616A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:03:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from mail.rdu.kirov.ru (ns.rdu.kirov.ru [217.9.151.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A225743D49 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:03:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from kirov.so-cdu.ru (kirov [172.21.81.1]) by mail.rdu.kirov.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBB5FE73; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:03:01 +0400 (MSD) Received: from kirov.so-cdu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rdu.kirov.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id 04B2415C32; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:03:01 +0400 (MSD) Received: by rdu.kirov.ru (Postfix, from userid 1014) id BEC1B15C31; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:03:00 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [172.21.81.52] (elsukov.kirov.so-cdu.ru [172.21.81.52]) by rdu.kirov.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id A937D15C1F; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:03:00 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <42E46475.8050504@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:03:01 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050602010800020307030801" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: patch to emulators/qemu, pty in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:03:03 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050602010800020307030801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! I have make a patch to qemu for PTY(3) creating. It allow easy kernel debug via virtual serial console. Example: # qemu -hda disk.img -cdrom 6.0-BETA1.iso -serial pty # gdb (gdb) target remote /dev/ptyp0 .... -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --------------050602010800020307030801 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-vl.c" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-vl.c" --- vl.c.orig Sat Apr 30 20:10:35 2005 +++ vl.c Sun Jul 24 16:42:14 2005 @@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ #include #include #include +#ifdef __FreeBSD__ +#include +#include +#endif #ifdef _BSD #include #ifndef __APPLE__ @@ -1280,7 +1284,7 @@ return chr; } -#if defined(__linux__) +#if defined(__linux__) || defined(__FreeBSD__) CharDriverState *qemu_chr_open_pty(void) { char slave_name[1024]; --------------050602010800020307030801-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 05:25:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824FE16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:25:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay-er5.mbrd.ru (relay-er5.mbrd.ru [194.117.71.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075F543D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:25:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from msd.mbrd.ru ([172.16.4.9]) by relay-er5.mbrd.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.x) id 1DwvSz-0009vg-3N; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:25:29 +0400 Message-ID: <42E477C8.5020207@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:25:28 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <17123.1272.243457.460650@bhuda.mired.org> <20050724032900.GA24567@xor.obsecurity.org> <17123.44634.790191.549056@bhuda.mired.org> <20050724155225.GA10448@soaustin.net> <20050724184444.GA2527@droopy.unibe.ch> <20050724193726.GA11019@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20050724193726.GA11019@soaustin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Mike Meyer , Tobias Roth , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Recursive dependency? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:25:46 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 08:44:44PM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote: > >>>So does this mean that 37596 needs to be reopened? Sem? >> >>'Someone' was me, and I can confirm that 37596 still is a problem >>as of today with -STABLE. That's why I pointed Mike to it and asked >>him to keep sem@ in the loop. > > > OK, as bugmeister I'm going to reopen it and mark it as 'suspended' > while the fix is being worked on, because it's my belief that that's > the way it should have been set in the first place. > > I'm quite aggressive in closing PRs ... when it's clear the problem > has been fixed or the circumstances no longer relevant, but that > doesn't sound like the case here. > > mcl OK. I see your point. So I'll place my patches (quite simple really) in the PR for review (there will a patch for bsd.port.mk too). -- Sem. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 05:35:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF3816A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:35:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bogorodskiy@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB54543D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:35:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bogorodskiy@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so309950rna for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:35:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp; b=Md7UvxKsGyGjtRvKVTAO3H/1d323ttqcilzNsnpiJefuCD63QWDGo/mABfLJ885e0P3D7wIycmBYmY1jgAgglBY50WxAxbcsgZRFHR7T/nHs2N3MPiuPF8CVhoj/UAXDZYCGaKSLlUQ/p27iL3xJly+k4P6ZZdyTqwCeavNhWx8= Received: by 10.38.59.70 with SMTP id h70mr1399601rna; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([195.161.251.72]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id g2sm497315rne.2005.07.24.22.35.24; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:44:22 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Message-ID: <20050725054422.GA916@lame.novel.ru> References: <42E46118.3000105@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E46118.3000105@yandex.ru> X-PGP: http://people.freebsd.org/~novel/novel.key.asc Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, esk@ira.uka.de Subject: Re: xmms recode patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:35:35 -0000 --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andrey wrote: > Hi! > I have make a patch to multimedia/xmms with new version of csa recode pat= ch. Please consider using send-pr(1) for sending patches as it is described in the Porters Handbook. Otherwise your patch may get lost in this high volume maillist.=20 Roman Bogorodskiy --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBQuR8NoB0WzgdqspGAQLE+QQAglGpOV22mTQhjKJGPIBJgQz6J/Zul4Ky WAav9Q1j9AHZ8ETVrWREtEgImMeSzCKzGC6VzXQmDGYcDZwN5COH8SQ4rJ3sRx0L wX/zMXJq5m6gL8u4/p1JOyQpWKusdch0mYVs0KbVbaplktqJqx+icJDMMy9DMQx+ dwJI6buCfpU= =7J6c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 07:49:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CB216A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:49:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@vicor.com) Received: from postoffice.vicor-nb.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311D443D4C for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:49:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@vicor.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postoffice.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2C74CE948 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postoffice.vicor-nb.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postoffice.vicor-nb.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67448-01 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by postoffice.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EED4CE944 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42E4997E.8050203@vicor.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:49:18 -0700 From: Julian Elischer Organization: VICOR User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050629 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postoffice.vicor.com Cc: Subject: port failure to build imake-6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:49:21 -0000 making port imake-6 on my own version of FreeBSD 6.0 schizo# cd work/xc/config/makedepend/ schizo# make rm -f makedepend cc -o makedepend -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi -pedantic -Wno-system-headers -Dasm=__asm -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wundef include.o main.o parse.o pr.o cppsetup.o ifparser.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgnumalloc -Wl,-rpath,/usr/X11R6/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,../../exports/lib /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgnumalloc *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/imake-6/work/xc/config/makedepend. # it compiled fine when I manually removed -lgnumalloc This MAY because in this company internal release uname -a returns schizo# uname -a FreeBSD schizo.dev.vicor-nb.com VICOR FreeBSD VICOR #0: Sat Jul 23 09:41:45 UTC 2005 root@fbsd6.dev.vicor-nb.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 so the release name doesn't have the work FreeBSD in it. either way I'm not sure why it decided to link with libgnumalloc. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 09:19:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A714516A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:19:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from mail.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D99243D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:19:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by patsy.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7025F17B826; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:19:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from patsy.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (patsy.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 80125-01-3; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:19:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from radagast.ijs.si (radagast.ijs.si [193.2.4.168]) by patsy.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0E717B81D; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:19:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.ijs.si (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by radagast.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7701702B; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:19:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Dejan Lesjak To: Julian Elischer Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:19:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507251119.05062.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port failure to build imake-6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:19:12 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > making port imake-6 on my own version of FreeBSD 6.0 >=20 >=20 > schizo# cd work/xc/config/makedepend/ > schizo# make > rm -f makedepend > cc -o makedepend -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi > -pedantic -Wno-system-headers -Dasm=3D__asm -Wall -Wpointer-arith > -Wundef include.o main.o parse.o pr.o cppsetup.o ifparser.o > -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgnumalloc -Wl,-rpath,/usr/X11R6/lib > -Wl,-rpath-link,../../exports/lib > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgnumalloc > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/imake-6/work/xc/config/makedepend. > # The same happens if you do 'make build' from port directory, right? > it compiled fine when I manually removed -lgnumalloc =46rom Makefile or just by copy-pasting that command line but without=20 =2Dlgnumalloc? >=20 >=20 > This MAY because in this company internal release uname -a returns >=20 > schizo# uname -a > FreeBSD schizo.dev.vicor-nb.com VICOR FreeBSD VICOR #0: Sat Jul 23 > 09:41:45 > UTC 2005 root@fbsd6.dev.vicor-nb.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC=20 > i386 Building on FreeBSD should show the line like this: Building on FreeBSD 6.0 amd64 [ELF] (6.0.0). somewhere in the middle of 'make configure' output. What does it show there? Could you provide xc/config/makedepend/Makefile (after doing 'make configur= e')=20 or see if there is -lgnumalloc somewhere in there? Dejan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 10:13:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20AEE16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:13:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from filippo.natali@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94CBF43D5F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:13:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from filippo.natali@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so386861rne for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:13:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=GFqLsdCWEcbKP1rCljKDQJiYLyKuDd/86yoc5S9+VqDG10AsDLflPqcygF3+R8FnXE+Ll4JRU97Dj0lCzMt54/GSWockDe9KRx73qBmEEgq4G4TGzknmWJMuTStE1GHj8CkVVed+3WNOb3Q8HGK5rYayYoQlIMMuEg1LkTA9WVw= Received: by 10.11.118.18 with SMTP id q18mr46848cwc; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.116.18 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8828e1ad05072503136d2a1260@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:13:54 +0000 From: Filippo Natali To: ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: python@freebsd.org Subject: BROKEN Zope products ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Filippo Natali List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:13:56 -0000 Hi, the package building problem with Zope products depending from python modules still stand from long time (since the introduction of python 2.4 as default version) and will be solved when Zope port will support python 2.4. The problem of double python dependency seems related only to the package building process, so I'm asking if skipping the package build adding NO_PACKAGE to these ports is a suitable workaround. regards, Filippo Natali From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 10:14:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA40C16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:14:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@vicor.com) Received: from postoffice.vicor-nb.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1FD43D72 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:14:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@vicor.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postoffice.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFE14CE92C; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:14:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postoffice.vicor-nb.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postoffice.vicor-nb.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73924-03; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:14:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by postoffice.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819394CE929; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:14:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42E4BB9E.2010403@vicor.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:14:54 -0700 From: Julian Elischer Organization: VICOR User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050629 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dejan Lesjak References: <200507251119.05062.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <200507251119.05062.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postoffice.vicor.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port failure to build imake-6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:14:56 -0000 Dejan Lesjak wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > >>making port imake-6 on my own version of FreeBSD 6.0 >> >> >>schizo# cd work/xc/config/makedepend/ >>schizo# make >>rm -f makedepend >>cc -o makedepend -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi >>-pedantic -Wno-system-headers -Dasm=__asm -Wall -Wpointer-arith >>-Wundef include.o main.o parse.o pr.o cppsetup.o ifparser.o >>-L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgnumalloc -Wl,-rpath,/usr/X11R6/lib >>-Wl,-rpath-link,../../exports/lib >>/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgnumalloc >>*** Error code 1 >> >>Stop in /usr/ports/devel/imake-6/work/xc/config/makedepend. >># > > > The same happens if you do 'make build' from port directory, right? it did > > >>it compiled fine when I manually removed -lgnumalloc > > > From Makefile or just by copy-pasting that command line but without > -lgnumalloc? I removed it from the Makefile in the appropriate directory. I'm rebuilding the release with a more normal name so that uname returns a more normal output and maybe the configure code will get it right this time.. I'll let you know.. > > >> >>This MAY because in this company internal release uname -a returns >> >>schizo# uname -a >>FreeBSD schizo.dev.vicor-nb.com VICOR FreeBSD VICOR #0: Sat Jul 23 >>09:41:45 >>UTC 2005 root@fbsd6.dev.vicor-nb.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >>i386 > > > Building on FreeBSD should show the line like this: > > Building on FreeBSD 6.0 amd64 [ELF] (6.0.0). > > somewhere in the middle of 'make configure' output. What does it show there? > Could you provide xc/config/makedepend/Makefile (after doing 'make configure') > or see if there is -lgnumalloc somewhere in there? If it still fails after I rebuild the release I'll gather this info.. it's rebuilding now but I'm off to sleep. thanks for the answer.. > > > Dejan > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 11:00:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B36216A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:00:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE23C43D49 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:00:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6PB0jiX017297 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:00:45 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6PB0irX017292 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:00:44 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:00:44 GMT Message-Id: <200507251100.j6PB0irX017292@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: FreeBSD ports list Subject: Current unassigned ports problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:00:46 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has been submitted, no sanity checking performed. a - analyzed The problem is understood and a solution is being sought. f - feedback Further work requires additional information from the originator or the community - possibly confirmation of the effectiveness of a proposed solution. p - patched A patch has been committed, but some issues (MFC and / or confirmation from originator) are still open. s - suspended The problem is not being worked on, due to lack of information or resources. This is a prime candidate for somebody who is looking for a project to do. If the problem cannot be solved at all, it will be closed, rather than suspended. c - closed A problem report is closed when any changes have been integrated, documented, and tested -- or when fixing the problem is abandoned. Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2005/07/24] ports/83973 ports-bugs [PATCH] mail/bsfilter: New version 1.0.9 1 problem total. Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- s [2002/12/18] ports/46338 ports-bugs security/cyrus-sasl 1.5.27_7 mysql_verify s [2003/05/11] ports/52079 ports-bugs vmware3 hangs when nmdm(4) is used as COM s [2003/08/08] ports/55371 ports-bugs xfig dumps core (unaligned access), if US o [2004/09/07] ports/71475 ports-bugs ACID (snort DB) detects versions incorrec o [2004/11/09] ports/73745 ports-bugs ports/databases/gnats4: gnatsd receives s s [2004/12/08] ports/74857 ports-bugs clamav socket problem o [2004/12/23] ports/75416 ports-bugs x11-toolkits/xview broken from removal of o [2005/01/14] ports/76231 ports-bugs Existance of PHP5 installation breaks dev f [2005/01/18] ports/76434 ports-bugs sysutils/lcdproc coredumps when started w o [2005/04/23] ports/80288 ports-bugs [PATCH] samba: processing of symlinks bro o [2005/05/01] ports/80514 ports-bugs emulators/vmware3: vmmon_smp.ko does not o [2005/05/29] ports/81631 ports-bugs new port: german/tvbrowser o [2005/06/21] ports/82498 ports-bugs xemacs spews 'X Error of failed..." whene f [2005/06/30] ports/82837 ports-bugs [patch] Missing dependencies at ftp/lftp o [2005/07/01] ports/82856 ports-bugs vmware3 port fails to compile on FreeBSD o [2005/07/02] ports/82885 ports-bugs New Port: devel/p5-Tree-Node f [2005/07/17] ports/83584 ports-bugs error in compling japanese/dvipdfm o [2005/07/22] ports/83905 ports-bugs [patch] lang/smalltalk tries to use backt o [2005/07/23] ports/83958 ports-bugs New Port: textproc/p5-Chess-PGN-Parse o [2005/07/25] ports/84039 ports-bugs New port: x11-fm/evidence Enlightened fil o [2005/07/25] ports/84048 ports-bugs sysutils/ntfsprogs: partition device acce 21 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- s [2002/05/13] ports/38034 ports-bugs compaq-cc (under linux-emu) installes man s [2002/10/07] ports/43771 ports-bugs LaTeX ports mixed between print and textp o [2003/05/12] ports/52106 ports-bugs New port: java/javaws: Java Web Start 1.2 f [2003/08/28] ports/56091 ports-bugs hp220 driver for print/ghostscript-gnu do s [2003/10/02] ports/57502 ports-bugs ports that define USE_* too late s [2003/11/13] ports/59254 ports-bugs ports that write something after bsd.port o [2003/12/21] ports/60472 ports-bugs [New Port] devel/doxymacs Doxymacs is Dox s [2004/01/17] ports/61471 ports-bugs Suggested mini-patch to ports/graphics/sa o [2004/02/02] ports/62256 ports-bugs New port: chinese/mozilla-sclp o [2004/02/29] ports/63543 ports-bugs New port: chinese/phpbb-zh_TW o [2004/03/15] ports/64307 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] databases/linux-unixODBC: RPM o [2004/04/24] ports/65934 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] japanese/ja-xmms: X Multimedia o [2004/04/28] ports/66042 ports-bugs new port: www/suexec13 (standalone suexec o [2004/05/04] ports/66246 ports-bugs new ports: textproc/docbook-utils, textpr s [2004/05/25] ports/67192 ports-bugs mod_perl-related regressions in the newes s [2004/06/11] ports/67815 ports-bugs graphics/ImageMagick no longer recognizes f [2004/09/08] ports/71489 ports-bugs [PATCH] www/slash: initial support for mo o [2004/09/22] ports/71997 ports-bugs New port:math/webwork used to create prob o [2004/09/29] ports/72170 ports-bugs [PATCH] www/mozilla-bonobo - build also w o [2004/10/12] ports/72550 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] mail/itraxp: Advanced perl sup o [2004/10/16] ports/72758 ports-bugs New port: latex-schedule s [2004/10/21] ports/72956 ports-bugs x11/dgs incorrectly marked as IGNORE o [2004/10/26] ports/73152 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] graphics/chartdirector: Charti o [2004/11/03] ports/73487 ports-bugs [New Port] devel/p5-Bundle-Perl6, A bundl o [2004/11/06] ports/73609 ports-bugs New port: x11-toolkits/wxhaskell o [2004/11/18] ports/74086 ports-bugs New port:chinese/chmsee A viewer for Micr f [2004/11/27] ports/74442 ports-bugs Upgrade multimedia/dvdrip to the latest r f [2004/12/21] ports/75369 ports-bugs new port net/p5-Perlbal p [2005/01/11] ports/76116 ports-bugs PORT UPDATE: graphics/lcms (with PATCH) f [2005/01/13] ports/76227 ports-bugs RLE support for graphics/fbm o [2005/01/17] ports/76365 ports-bugs NEW PORT net/xdb_auth_cpile A user auth/c o [2005/01/17] ports/76379 ports-bugs New port:biology/p5-Bio-Das o [2005/02/02] ports/76986 ports-bugs New port: print/pmx a pre-processor of Mu s [2005/02/13] ports/77453 ports-bugs [request] new port: print/ghostpcl o [2005/02/14] ports/77471 ports-bugs New port: Device driver for Voicetronix O o [2005/02/16] ports/77584 ports-bugs New ports: games/sear, games/sear-media. f [2005/02/22] ports/77899 ports-bugs [Maintainer Update] graphics/bugle 0.0. o [2005/02/23] ports/77980 ports-bugs New Port: www/p5-POE-Component-Server-HTT o [2005/02/24] ports/78012 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] net/abills: Billing system fro o [2005/03/14] ports/78830 ports-bugs New port: print/latex-auto-greek Auto-swi o [2005/03/15] ports/78898 ports-bugs new ports chinese/lumaqq: General QQ-like o [2005/03/19] ports/79021 ports-bugs New port: linux_base-fedora o [2005/03/20] ports/79049 ports-bugs New port net-mgmt/netdump-server:RedHat s f [2005/03/25] ports/79235 ports-bugs [maintainer update] sysutils/dtc: v0.17.0 f [2005/03/28] ports/79297 ports-bugs New port: audio/p5-MP3-ID3Lib o [2005/04/17] ports/80043 ports-bugs New port: devel/metaEnv CWI MetaEnvironme f [2005/04/20] ports/80173 ports-bugs unixstat port broken under FreeBSD 5.3 (b s [2005/04/22] ports/80254 ports-bugs update net/poptop and rename to net/pptpd o [2005/04/22] ports/80255 ports-bugs New Port : print/lpr-wrapper A user level f [2005/04/23] ports/80274 ports-bugs GDB console problem (ddd-3.3.10 with Free o [2005/04/26] ports/80352 ports-bugs New port: security/webfwlog Web-based fir f [2005/05/01] ports/80515 ports-bugs emulators/vmware3: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/vm f [2005/05/04] ports/80629 ports-bugs tuxracer segfaults on amd64 o [2005/05/05] ports/80639 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] www/gwee: Tool to exploit comm f [2005/05/11] ports/80916 ports-bugs db43 does not build (with gcc4.0?) o [2005/05/17] ports/81153 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] chinese/DFSongSd: Chinese (HKS f [2005/05/25] ports/81481 ports-bugs portmanage maybe fflush(3) before system( o [2005/06/06] ports/81933 ports-bugs update ports: japanese/wikicker o [2005/06/13] ports/82190 ports-bugs UPDATE: security/openssh-portable - adds o [2005/06/13] ports/82200 ports-bugs [PATCH] sysutils/gkrelltop: gkrelltopd en o [2005/06/14] ports/82218 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] japanese/guesswork: A PHP ligh o [2005/06/15] ports/82289 ports-bugs New Port: sysutils/p5-Sys-Mknod cpan perl s [2005/06/16] ports/82310 ports-bugs [new port] request: sysutils/initng o [2005/06/17] ports/82354 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] mail/mimetic: A GPL MIME libra o [2005/06/19] ports/82427 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] security/amavisd-milter: Milte o [2005/06/21] ports/82501 ports-bugs New port: www/referrercop Filters referre o [2005/06/22] ports/82507 ports-bugs [new port] www/quixote-session2: quixote o [2005/06/22] ports/82527 ports-bugs New port: databases/pgmemcache Provides a o [2005/06/23] ports/82574 ports-bugs New port: print/php4-cpdf cpdf support fo o [2005/06/23] ports/82575 ports-bugs New port: print/php5-cpdf cpdf support fo f [2005/06/23] ports/82582 ports-bugs update www/xist to 2.10 f [2005/06/24] ports/82618 ports-bugs multimedia/xmms uses 32bit int for ioctl o [2005/06/25] ports/82633 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] comms/jerm: Communication term o [2005/06/25] ports/82640 ports-bugs New port: lang/fpc2 o [2005/06/28] ports/82726 ports-bugs New port: databases/sqlplus Oracle SQL*Pl f [2005/06/29] ports/82797 ports-bugs [PATCH] devel/argouml: update to 0.18.1 o [2005/06/30] ports/82814 ports-bugs [update] ja-scim-skk to 0.3.0 o [2005/06/30] ports/82821 ports-bugs New port: graphics/py-gdchart2: python li f [2005/06/30] ports/82825 ports-bugs update www/clearsilver to compile on othe o [2005/07/03] ports/82950 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] devel/subversion-ruby: Subvers o [2005/07/07] ports/83113 ports-bugs new port: misc/ree - A tool to dump your o [2005/07/07] ports/83115 ports-bugs New port: games/exhaust - Redcode simulat o [2005/07/07] ports/83116 ports-bugs New port: games/exhaust-ma - Redcode simu o [2005/07/08] ports/83120 ports-bugs New port: games/exhaust-doc - Redcode sim o [2005/07/08] ports/83135 ports-bugs sysutils/smartmontools -- Does not work w f [2005/07/10] ports/83226 ports-bugs security/lockdown does not compile on 4.1 o [2005/07/12] ports/83312 ports-bugs Abort trap while building devel/icu port o [2005/07/12] ports/83315 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] devel/simian: simlarity analys o [2005/07/14] ports/83433 ports-bugs New port: lang/polyml Fast open-source im o [2005/07/14] ports/83455 ports-bugs [MAINTAINER] security/openct: [SUMMARIZE f [2005/07/14] ports/83481 ports-bugs New port: sysutils/graphicboot o [2005/07/14] ports/83483 ports-bugs [new port] again, devel/py-kde-extensions f [2005/07/16] ports/83546 ports-bugs ftp/emirror port seems broken on 4.x o [2005/07/19] ports/83707 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] math/p5-Statistics-R: Controls o [2005/07/19] ports/83725 ports-bugs [PATCH] finance/kmymoney2: update to 0.7. o [2005/07/19] ports/83727 ports-bugs [UPDATE] games/pmars - A portable corewar o [2005/07/19] ports/83728 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] games/pmars-server - A portabl o [2005/07/19] ports/83729 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] games/pmars-curses - A portabl o [2005/07/19] ports/83730 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] games/pmars-x11 - A portable c o [2005/07/19] ports/83731 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] games/pmars-sdl - A portable c o [2005/07/19] ports/83732 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] games/pmars-doc - A portable c o [2005/07/19] ports/83749 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] net/convey: An Instant Message o [2005/07/20] ports/83812 ports-bugs new port, security/sguil-sensor, update t o [2005/07/21] ports/83838 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] print/latex-circ: A LaTeX pack o [2005/07/21] ports/83842 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] devel/cegui o [2005/07/21] ports/83843 ports-bugs ftp/fmirror does not support IPv6 o [2005/07/21] ports/83854 ports-bugs Update port: emulators/grustibus o [2005/07/21] ports/83858 ports-bugs Update port: math/convertall to 0.3.1 o [2005/07/21] ports/83866 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] devel/pear-HTML_Template_Sigma o [2005/07/21] ports/83877 ports-bugs [UPDATE] games/freedroid: clean up and ta o [2005/07/22] ports/83894 ports-bugs Update port: devel/simpletest o [2005/07/22] ports/83908 ports-bugs [update] irc/fisg to 0.3.12 o [2005/07/22] ports/83912 ports-bugs New Port: sysutils/psgconf modular system o [2005/07/22] ports/83913 ports-bugs Suggestion for OpenVPN startup script o [2005/07/22] ports/83916 ports-bugs Repocopy request for games/gnocatan to ga o [2005/07/22] ports/83924 ports-bugs misc/compat4x: Bad system call (core dump o [2005/07/22] ports/83926 ports-bugs maintainer update for heyu port, conflict o [2005/07/23] ports/83935 ports-bugs misc/heyu2: maintainer update to add conf o [2005/07/23] ports/83937 ports-bugs update ports: www/tdiary o [2005/07/23] ports/83939 ports-bugs [New Port] games/cavezofphear - Boulder D o [2005/07/23] ports/83950 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] mail/squirrelmail-change_ldap- o [2005/07/23] ports/83960 ports-bugs Update port: security/samhain to 2.0.8 o [2005/07/23] ports/83963 ports-bugs [PATCH] irc/ircd-hybrid: update to 7.1.0, o [2005/07/23] ports/83964 ports-bugs new port: security/sguil-server, resubmis o [2005/07/24] ports/83979 ports-bugs update cad/impact port to version 1.6.1 o [2005/07/24] ports/83984 ports-bugs Update www/p5-libapreq2 2.05 -> 2.06 o [2005/07/24] ports/83986 ports-bugs New port www/p5-Apache2-DebugFilter o [2005/07/24] ports/83987 ports-bugs New port www/p5-Apache2-Filter-HTTPHeader o [2005/07/24] ports/83988 ports-bugs [PATCH] security/amavisd-new: properly se o [2005/07/24] ports/83990 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] math/asymptote: A powerful scr o [2005/07/24] ports/84003 ports-bugs [PATCH] net/fspclient: update to 0.91.0 o [2005/07/24] ports/84005 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] devel/p5-Encode: Provides inte o [2005/07/24] ports/84012 ports-bugs [Port Update]: devel/root o [2005/07/24] ports/84013 ports-bugs [Port Update]: devel/root-doc o [2005/07/24] ports/84016 ports-bugs Update Port: lang/munger => 4.60 o [2005/07/24] ports/84025 ports-bugs new port: audio/playgsf - A command line o [2005/07/25] ports/84028 ports-bugs New port - security/tlswrap o [2005/07/25] ports/84029 ports-bugs [patch] devel/portlint is too enthousiast o [2005/07/25] ports/84036 ports-bugs [PATCH] japanese/rskkserv: Conver start s o [2005/07/25] ports/84038 ports-bugs upgrade security/clamav from 0.81 to 0.82 o [2005/07/25] ports/84044 ports-bugs sysutils/udfclient: update to version 0.4 o [2005/07/25] ports/84045 ports-bugs Upgrade to BLD v0.3.3 o [2005/07/25] ports/84046 ports-bugs [PATCH] lang/gdc: The default include pat o [2005/07/25] ports/84047 ports-bugs [PATCH]: audio/easytag-devel o [2005/07/25] ports/84049 ports-bugs Upgrade port: net/sulci (upgrade to the c 145 problems total. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 13:31:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6354216A432 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:31:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skoglund@ira.uka.de) Received: from iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.10.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C337A43D49 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:31:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skoglund@ira.uka.de) Received: from irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.10.5]) by iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtps id 1Dx32t-0002BK-H2; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:31:09 +0200 Received: from i30s5.ibds.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.40.105] helo=i30s5.ibds.uka.de) by irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtps id 1Dx32s-0002p9-S1; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:31:02 +0200 Received: from skoglund by i30s5.ibds.uka.de with local (Exim 4.51) id 1Dx32s-0003ob-40; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:31:02 +0200 From: Espen Skoglund MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17124.59796.854955.397959@i30nb20.ira.uka.de> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:31:00 +0200 To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" In-Reply-To: <42E46118.3000105@yandex.ru> References: <42E46118.3000105@yandex.ru> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 14) "Reasonable Discussion" XEmacs Lucid Sender: Espen Skoglund X-Spam-Score: -5.8 (-----) X-Spam-Status: No Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xmms recode patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:31:12 -0000 [Andrey V Elsukov] > Hi! > I have make a patch to multimedia/xmms with new version of csa > recode patch. Thanks for patch. However, your modification only works if you specify that you want to compile with the recode patch. The reason for the failure is that the file 'files/patch-strlen' is applied unconditionally. I suggest that you either apply this patch only if applying the recode patch, or that you integrate the patch into the recode patch itself. Also, as mentioned by other people, using send-pr(1) to submit patches is preferred. eSk From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 14:12:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3403516A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:12:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D149F43D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:12:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from [128.131.111.48] (pulcherrima [128.131.111.48]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825D513787; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Patrick Dung In-Reply-To: <20050722125723.55175.qmail@web52104.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <20050722125723.55175.qmail@web52104.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Steve Watt , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gcc34 missing gcj? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:12:04 -0000 On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Patrick Dung wrote: > Recently, I have problem in runing gcj from 4.0.1 port,07072005, gcj > spec problem. > > I'll try to compile gcj from gcc 4.1 port. If successful, pdftk will no > longer be broken. Did it work? That would be great -- and if it does not, please go ahead and file a bug report at the http://gcc.gnu.org Bugzilla. Gerald From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 15:58:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514E816A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:58:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk) Received: from web52114.mail.yahoo.com (web52114.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.48.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B972D43D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:58:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk) Received: (qmail 25492 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Jul 2005 15:58:39 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.hk; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=TLolKRt1+mWi+xOHPconfHQu3YGamiQu8iwgNQJYzGST5ATIfA1v3cAZv9UNlWO0K3ZwpGLQx59QJEksMFvEEAxai3p9DNRQk+zpP6GyLNPHn6axlIiOHSx/iac/bg0ARY44s7IsALTc/GLpyMoGcbdA+Dkfe5TSspE1DaQAJ9c= ; Message-ID: <20050725155839.25490.qmail@web52114.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [61.10.7.202] by web52114.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:58:38 PDT Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:58:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Patrick Dung To: Gerald Pfeifer In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Steve Watt , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gcc34 missing gcj? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:58:40 -0000 Before I can build gcc41, I have messed up with my FBDS 5.4-stable upgrade to FreeBSD6.0BETA1. I have to reinstall my box. If you have gcc41, please try to compile pdftk. Just change the USE_GCC from 34 to 41. And then build the pdftk port. Regards Patrick --- Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Patrick Dung wrote: > > Recently, I have problem in runing gcj from 4.0.1 port,07072005, > gcj > > spec problem. > > > > I'll try to compile gcj from gcc 4.1 port. If successful, pdftk > will no > > longer be broken. > > Did it work? That would be great -- and if it does not, please go > ahead > and file a bug report at the http://gcc.gnu.org Bugzilla. > > Gerald > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 16:24:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E59A16A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:24:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB43243D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:24:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CB8388FD5 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:24:35 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:24:35 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4250543804C28DFC5090DDA2@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Question about iwidgets port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:24:36 -0000 I'm working on a new port that requires iwidgets. Iwidgets is being checked for and installed if if's not listed. However, when I try to start the program (which is a tk script using wish8.4) the script complains that iwidgets isn't installed. Here's the error: ERROR: Cannot fine the Iwidgets extension. The iwidgets package is part of the incr tcl extension and is available as a port/package most systems. See http://www.tcltk.com/iwidgets/ for more info. The script uses package require, which appears (to me) to be the correct syntax. # Load iwidgets and namespaces if [catch {package require Iwidgets} iwidgetsVersion] { puts "ERROR: Cannot fine the Iwidgets extension." puts "The iwidgets package is part of the incr tcl extension and is" puts "available as a port/package most systems." puts "See http://www.tcltk.com/iwidgets/ for more info." exit } So I assume this is some sort of pathing or env error. I've been googling for a while, but there's a paucity of documentation on the web about tcl and tk, and I haven't found anything addressing this sort of problem. The install of iwidgets doesn't run ldconfig, so I'm assuming this isn't a library registration error, but any help on tracking this down would be very much appreciated. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 20:26:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFB016A41F; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:26:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6235F43D45; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:26:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn [127.0.0.1]) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j6PKQYF8007638; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:26:34 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (uucp@localhost) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id j6PKQYIf007636; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:26:34 +0200 Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.11.4/8.8.5) id j6PKQBr43809; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:26:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen Lock Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:26:09 +0200 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050725222608.A42815@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: need help with kqemu X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:26:43 -0000 Hi! Fabrice has released a new version of kqemu that now also supports amd64 hosts, but as he doesnt know FreeBSD (and my kernel foo is far from being good enough, neither do i have an amd64 box) we need someone to port the wrapper to amd64. Actually the i386 wrapper he has now added to the release (kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) doesnt work either (not sure what happened there, it doesnt even build), so we need someone to fix/update that as well. I have made an update for the port that can be used as a template (only non-kqemu build works), I'll append it below: Removed files: files/BSDmakefile files/kmod_bsd.c New files: files/kqemu-Makefile-patch files/patch-libmath2 files/patch-vl.c (btw patch-vl.c is from Andrey V. Elsukov, it enables kernel debugging via virtual serial console, as posted on -ports: # qemu -hda disk.img -cdrom 6.0-BETA1.iso -serial pty # gdb (gdb) target remote /dev/ptyp0 ....) Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/qemu/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.27 diff -u -r1.27 Makefile --- Makefile 19 Jul 2005 06:06:56 -0000 1.27 +++ Makefile 25 Jul 2005 16:52:49 -0000 @@ -6,12 +6,9 @@ # PORTNAME= qemu -PORTVERSION= 0.7.0s.20050717 +PORTVERSION= 0.7.1 CATEGORIES= emulators -MASTER_SITES= http://www.qemu.org/ \ - http://people.fruitsalad.org/nox/qemu/ \ - http://dad-answers.com/qemu/ -DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-snapshot-2005-07-17_23 +MASTER_SITES= http://www.qemu.org/ EXTRACT_ONLY= ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX} MAINTAINER= nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de @@ -23,12 +20,12 @@ .endif .if defined(WITH_KQEMU) -DISTKQEMU= kqemu-0.6.2-1.tar.gz +DISTKQEMU= kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz DISTFILES= ${EXTRACT_ONLY} ${DISTKQEMU} +EXTRA_PATCHES= ${FILESDIR}/kqemu-Makefile-patch .endif HAS_CONFIGURE= yes -USE_BZIP2= yes USE_GMAKE= yes USE_GETOPT_LONG= yes USE_SDL= sdl @@ -85,7 +82,7 @@ .if defined(WITH_KQEMU) post-extract: @cd ${WRKSRC} && ${TAR} xfz ${_DISTDIR}/${DISTKQEMU} - @${CP} ${FILESDIR}/BSDmakefile ${FILESDIR}/kmod_bsd.c ${WRKSRC}/kqemu + @${LN} -s Makefile.freebsd ${WRKSRC}/kqemu/BSDmakefile .endif pre-patch: Index: distinfo =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/qemu/distinfo,v retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -r1.20 distinfo --- distinfo 19 Jul 2005 06:06:56 -0000 1.20 +++ distinfo 25 Jul 2005 16:40:12 -0000 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -MD5 (qemu-snapshot-2005-07-17_23.tar.bz2) = 5d21295c1f328ea00de19a54715ee7c3 -SIZE (qemu-snapshot-2005-07-17_23.tar.bz2) = 1114748 -MD5 (kqemu-0.6.2-1.tar.gz) = c6bb3b40fb3d526d731eb0f1f9dee7ee -SIZE (kqemu-0.6.2-1.tar.gz) = 21002 +MD5 (qemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) = b0c80d2c082049a5b8ccbc7f55fe165b +SIZE (qemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) = 1338521 +MD5 (kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) = 8fc7967492b2157521198f6639218420 +SIZE (kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) = 76135 Index: files/kqemu-Makefile-patch @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +Index: qemu/kqemu/Makefile.freebsd +@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ + # $Id: Makefile.freebsd,v 1.1 2005/04/17 17:21:31 bellard Exp $ + KMOD= kqemu +-SRCS= kmod-freebsd.c ++SRCS= kqemu-freebsd.c + OBJS= kqemu-mod-i386.o ++.if ${OSVERSION} >= 500000 ++CC= cc ++.endif ++WERROR= + + .include Index: files/patch-libmath2 @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +Index: qemu/bsd/Makefile +@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ + ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_rintl.c \ + ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_round.c \ + ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_sinl.S \ +- ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_tanl.S ++ ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_tanl.S \ ++ ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_ldexpl.c + + OBJS= ${SRCS:R:S/$/.o/} + +Index: qemu/bsd/i386/s_ldexpl.c +@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ ++#include ++#include ++#include ++ ++long double __ldexpl(long double x, int expn) ++{ ++ long double res; ++ if (!isfinite (x) || x == 0.0L) ++ return x; ++ ++ __asm__ ("fscale" ++ : "=t" (res) ++ : "0" (x), "u" ((long double) expn)); ++ ++ if (!isfinite (res) || res == 0.0L) ++ errno = ERANGE; ++ ++ return res; ++} ++ ++weak_alias(__ldexpl,ldexpl) +Index: qemu/bsd/amd64/s_ldexpl.c +@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ ++#include ++#include ++#include ++ ++long double __ldexpl(long double x, int expn) ++{ ++ long double res; ++ if (!isfinite (x) || x == 0.0L) ++ return x; ++ ++ __asm__ ("fscale" ++ : "=t" (res) ++ : "0" (x), "u" ((long double) expn)); ++ ++ if (!isfinite (res) || res == 0.0L) ++ errno = ERANGE; ++ ++ return res; ++} ++ ++weak_alias(__ldexpl,ldexpl) +Index: qemu/target-i386/helper.c +@@ -2886,6 +2886,8 @@ + ST0 = floatx_round_to_int(ST0, &env->fp_status); + } + ++long double ldexpl(long double, int); ++ + void helper_fscale(void) + { + ST0 = ldexp (ST0, (int)(ST1)); Index: files/patch-vl.c @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +Index: qemu/vl.c +@@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ + #include + #include + #include ++#ifdef __FreeBSD__ ++#include ++#include ++#endif + #ifdef _BSD + #include + #ifndef __APPLE__ +@@ -1280,7 +1284,7 @@ + return chr; + } + +-#if defined(__linux__) ++#if defined(__linux__) || defined(__FreeBSD__) + CharDriverState *qemu_chr_open_pty(void) + { + char slave_name[1024]; From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 22:25:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0043916A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:25:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael-pelletier@tampabay.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-02.tampabay.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.5.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB9243D46 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:25:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael-pelletier@tampabay.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.1.25] (27-248.119-70.tampabay.res.rr.com [70.119.248.27]) by ms-smtp-02.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j6PMPMb6009764; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:25:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Michael J. Pelletier" To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:25:20 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 X-PRIORITY: 2 (High) Priority: urgent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507251825.21112.michael-pelletier@tampabay.rr.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: tk-8.4.11,2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:25:26 -0000 Hello, Today (after a cvsup) I tried to install tk version 8.4 however, make breaks with this message: laptop# make === Aborted, please remove /nonexistent *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk84. laptop# Is this a known issue or am I screwing something up? Thanks, Michael From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 22:26:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD52416A420; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:26:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680F543D58; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:26:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6PMSLHG036444; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:28:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:25:50 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20050725222608.A42815@saturn.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <20050725222608.A42815@saturn.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_vbW5CTfX8oQ8HhB" Message-Id: <200507251825.51540.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.85.1/992/Mon Jul 25 17:48:49 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, Juergen Lock Subject: Re: need help with kqemu X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:26:14 -0000 --Boundary-00=_vbW5CTfX8oQ8HhB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 25 July 2005 04:26 pm, Juergen Lock wrote: > Hi! > > Fabrice has released a new version of kqemu that now also > supports amd64 hosts, but as he doesnt know FreeBSD (and my > kernel foo is far from being good enough, neither do i have > an amd64 box) we need someone to port the wrapper to amd64. > Actually the i386 wrapper he has now added to the release > (kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) doesnt work either (not sure what happened > there, it doesnt even build), so we need someone to fix/update > that as well. I have made an update for the port that can be > used as a template (only non-kqemu build works), I'll append it > below: > > Removed files: files/BSDmakefile files/kmod_bsd.c > New files: files/kqemu-Makefile-patch files/patch-libmath2 > files/patch-vl.c > > (btw patch-vl.c is from Andrey V. Elsukov, it enables kernel > debugging via virtual serial console, as posted on -ports: > > # qemu -hda disk.img -cdrom 6.0-BETA1.iso -serial pty > # gdb > (gdb) target remote /dev/ptyp0 > ....) Try the attachment. It seems to build and work on amd64 now, including kqemu. Thanks! Jung-uk Kim --Boundary-00=_vbW5CTfX8oQ8HhB Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="qemu.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="qemu.diff" Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/qemu/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.27 diff -u -r1.27 Makefile --- Makefile 19 Jul 2005 06:06:56 -0000 1.27 +++ Makefile 25 Jul 2005 22:16:33 -0000 @@ -6,12 +6,9 @@ # PORTNAME= qemu -PORTVERSION= 0.7.0s.20050717 +PORTVERSION= 0.7.1 CATEGORIES= emulators -MASTER_SITES= http://www.qemu.org/ \ - http://people.fruitsalad.org/nox/qemu/ \ - http://dad-answers.com/qemu/ -DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-snapshot-2005-07-17_23 +MASTER_SITES= http://www.qemu.org/ EXTRACT_ONLY= ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX} MAINTAINER= nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de @@ -23,12 +20,12 @@ .endif .if defined(WITH_KQEMU) -DISTKQEMU= kqemu-0.6.2-1.tar.gz +DISTKQEMU= kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz DISTFILES= ${EXTRACT_ONLY} ${DISTKQEMU} +EXTRA_PATCHES= ${FILESDIR}/kqemu-freebsd-patch .endif HAS_CONFIGURE= yes -USE_BZIP2= yes USE_GMAKE= yes USE_GETOPT_LONG= yes USE_SDL= sdl @@ -40,9 +37,11 @@ ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= amd64 i386 .if defined(WITH_KQEMU) NO_PACKAGE= Depends on kernel, and module not redistributable +CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-kqemu PLIST_SUB= WITH_KQEMU="" PLIST_SUB+= KMODDIR=${KMODDIR} .else +CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --disable-kqemu PLIST_SUB= WITH_KQEMU="@comment " .endif @@ -52,7 +51,7 @@ .if ${ARCH} == "amd64" ARCH= x86_64 -.if ${OSVERSION} >= 502126 +.if ${OSVERSION} >= 502126 && ${OSVERSION} <= 600029 BUILD_DEPENDS+= gcc34:${PORTSDIR}/lang/gcc34 GCCVERSION= 030402 CC= gcc34 @@ -63,16 +62,12 @@ USE_GCC= 3.4 .endif -.if defined(WITH_KQEMU) && ${ARCH} != "i386" -IGNORE= kqemu only supported on i386 -.endif - .if defined(WITH_KQEMU) && !exists(${SRC_BASE}/sys/Makefile) IGNORE= kqemu requires kernel source to be installed .endif pre-everything:: -.if !defined(WITH_KQEMU) && ${ARCH} == "i386" +.if !defined(WITH_KQEMU) @${ECHO_MSG} "Notice: you can build qemu with the (alpha!) kqemu accelerator kernel module" @${ECHO_MSG} "by defining WITH_KQEMU." .endif @@ -85,7 +80,7 @@ .if defined(WITH_KQEMU) post-extract: @cd ${WRKSRC} && ${TAR} xfz ${_DISTDIR}/${DISTKQEMU} - @${CP} ${FILESDIR}/BSDmakefile ${FILESDIR}/kmod_bsd.c ${WRKSRC}/kqemu + @${LN} -s Makefile.freebsd ${WRKSRC}/kqemu/BSDmakefile .endif pre-patch: Index: distinfo =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/qemu/distinfo,v retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -r1.20 distinfo --- distinfo 19 Jul 2005 06:06:56 -0000 1.20 +++ distinfo 25 Jul 2005 22:16:33 -0000 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -MD5 (qemu-snapshot-2005-07-17_23.tar.bz2) = 5d21295c1f328ea00de19a54715ee7c3 -SIZE (qemu-snapshot-2005-07-17_23.tar.bz2) = 1114748 -MD5 (kqemu-0.6.2-1.tar.gz) = c6bb3b40fb3d526d731eb0f1f9dee7ee -SIZE (kqemu-0.6.2-1.tar.gz) = 21002 +MD5 (qemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) = b0c80d2c082049a5b8ccbc7f55fe165b +SIZE (qemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) = 1338521 +MD5 (kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) = 8fc7967492b2157521198f6639218420 +SIZE (kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) = 76135 Index: files/patch-fbsd =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/qemu/files/patch-fbsd,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 patch-fbsd --- files/patch-fbsd 5 May 2005 12:41:10 -0000 1.2 +++ files/patch-fbsd 25 Jul 2005 22:16:33 -0000 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ $(MAKE) -C kqemu -f Makefile.winnt else - $(MAKE) -C kqemu -+ cd kqemu && $(BSD_MAKE) ++ ( cd kqemu && $(BSD_MAKE) ) endif endif --- files/kqemu-freebsd-patch Mon Jul 25 18:11:00 2005 +++ files/kqemu-freebsd-patch Mon Jul 25 18:04:37 2005 @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +--- qemu/configure.orig Mon Jul 25 17:58:33 2005 ++++ qemu/configure Mon Jul 25 17:59:55 2005 +@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ + FreeBSD) + bsd="yes" + oss="yes" +-if [ "$cpu" = "i386" ] ; then ++if [ "$cpu" = "i386" -o "$cpu" = "x86_64" ] ; then + kqemu="yes" + fi + ;; +--- qemu/kqemu/Makefile.freebsd.orig Sun Apr 17 13:21:31 2005 ++++ qemu/kqemu/Makefile.freebsd Mon Jul 25 17:32:48 2005 +@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@ + # $Id: Makefile.freebsd,v 1.1 2005/04/17 17:21:31 bellard Exp $ + KMOD= kqemu +-SRCS= kmod-freebsd.c ++SRCS= kqemu-freebsd.c ++.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386" + OBJS= kqemu-mod-i386.o ++.elif ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" ++OBJS= kqemu-mod-x86_64.o ++.endif ++WERROR= + + .include +--- qemu/kqemu/kqemu-freebsd.c.orig Mon Apr 25 18:14:40 2005 ++++ qemu/kqemu/kqemu-freebsd.c Mon Jul 25 17:40:17 2005 +@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ + // printf("kqemu_unlock_user_page(%08lx)\n", page_index); + va = (vm_offset_t)page; + ret = vm_map_unwire(&vm->vm_map, va, va+PAGE_SIZE, VM_MAP_WIRE_USER); +- if (ret != KERN_SUCCESS) { +- printf("kqemu_unlock_user_page(%08lx) failed, ret=%d\n", page_index, ret); +- } ++ // if (ret != KERN_SUCCESS) { ++ // printf("kqemu_unlock_user_page(%08lx) failed, ret=%d\n", page_index, ret); ++ // } + } + + /* +@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ + + void CDECL kqemu_free_page(struct kqemu_page *page) + { +- printf("kqemu_free_page(%08lx)\n", page_index); ++ // printf("kqemu_free_page(%08lx)\n", page_index); + /* XXX: do it */ + } + --- files/patch-libmath2 Mon Jul 25 18:11:00 2005 +++ files/patch-libmath2 Mon Jul 25 16:54:12 2005 @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +Index: qemu/bsd/Makefile +@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ + ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_rintl.c \ + ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_round.c \ + ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_sinl.S \ +- ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_tanl.S ++ ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_tanl.S \ ++ ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_ldexpl.c + + OBJS= ${SRCS:R:S/$/.o/} + +Index: qemu/bsd/i386/s_ldexpl.c +@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ ++#include ++#include ++#include ++ ++long double __ldexpl(long double x, int expn) ++{ ++ long double res; ++ if (!isfinite (x) || x == 0.0L) ++ return x; ++ ++ __asm__ ("fscale" ++ : "=t" (res) ++ : "0" (x), "u" ((long double) expn)); ++ ++ if (!isfinite (res) || res == 0.0L) ++ errno = ERANGE; ++ ++ return res; ++} ++ ++weak_alias(__ldexpl,ldexpl) +Index: qemu/bsd/amd64/s_ldexpl.c +@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ ++#include ++#include ++#include ++ ++long double __ldexpl(long double x, int expn) ++{ ++ long double res; ++ if (!isfinite (x) || x == 0.0L) ++ return x; ++ ++ __asm__ ("fscale" ++ : "=t" (res) ++ : "0" (x), "u" ((long double) expn)); ++ ++ if (!isfinite (res) || res == 0.0L) ++ errno = ERANGE; ++ ++ return res; ++} ++ ++weak_alias(__ldexpl,ldexpl) +Index: qemu/target-i386/helper.c +@@ -2886,6 +2886,8 @@ + ST0 = floatx_round_to_int(ST0, &env->fp_status); + } + ++long double ldexpl(long double, int); ++ + void helper_fscale(void) + { + ST0 = ldexp (ST0, (int)(ST1)); --- files/patch-vl.c Mon Jul 25 18:11:00 2005 +++ files/patch-vl.c Mon Jul 25 16:54:12 2005 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +Index: qemu/vl.c +@@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ + #include + #include + #include ++#ifdef __FreeBSD__ ++#include ++#include ++#endif + #ifdef _BSD + #include + #ifndef __APPLE__ +@@ -1280,7 +1284,7 @@ + return chr; + } + +-#if defined(__linux__) ++#if defined(__linux__) || defined(__FreeBSD__) + CharDriverState *qemu_chr_open_pty(void) + { + char slave_name[1024]; --Boundary-00=_vbW5CTfX8oQ8HhB-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 22:28:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222AB16A41F; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:28:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B255C43D46; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:28:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6PMUCgc036505; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:30:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:27:41 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20050725222608.A42815@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <200507251825.51540.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200507251825.51540.jkim@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507251827.42671.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.85.1/992/Mon Jul 25 17:48:49 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, Juergen Lock Subject: Re: need help with kqemu X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:28:08 -0000 On Monday 25 July 2005 06:25 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Monday 25 July 2005 04:26 pm, Juergen Lock wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Fabrice has released a new version of kqemu that now also > > supports amd64 hosts, but as he doesnt know FreeBSD (and my > > kernel foo is far from being good enough, neither do i have > > an amd64 box) we need someone to port the wrapper to amd64. > > Actually the i386 wrapper he has now added to the release > > (kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) doesnt work either (not sure what happened > > there, it doesnt even build), so we need someone to fix/update > > that as well. I have made an update for the port that can be > > used as a template (only non-kqemu build works), I'll append it > > below: > > > > Removed files: files/BSDmakefile files/kmod_bsd.c > > New files: files/kqemu-Makefile-patch files/patch-libmath2 > > files/patch-vl.c > > > > (btw patch-vl.c is from Andrey V. Elsukov, it enables kernel > > debugging via virtual serial console, as posted on -ports: > > > > # qemu -hda disk.img -cdrom 6.0-BETA1.iso -serial pty > > # gdb > > (gdb) target remote /dev/ptyp0 > > ....) > > Try the attachment. It seems to build and work on amd64 now, > including kqemu. Oops, I forgot to tell you that I renamed files/kqemu-Makefile-patch to files/kqemu-freebsd-patch because it has more than Makefile.freebsd patch now. Sorry, Jung-uk Kim > Thanks! > > Jung-uk Kim From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 22:29:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9391616A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:29:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from lakermmtao12.cox.net (lakermmtao12.cox.net [68.230.240.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FFC43D48 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:29:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.140]) by lakermmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050725222930.BAGU21492.lakermmtao12.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:29:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:30:47 -0500 To: "Michael J. Pelletier" References: <200507251825.21112.michael-pelletier@tampabay.rr.com> From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200507251825.21112.michael-pelletier@tampabay.rr.com> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.01 (Linux, build 1204) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: tk-8.4.11,2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:29:39 -0000 On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:25:20 -0500, Michael J. Pelletier wrote: > Hello, > > Today (after a cvsup) I tried to install tk version 8.4 however, make > breaks > with this message: > > laptop# make > === Aborted, please remove /nonexistent > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk84. > laptop# > > Is this a known issue or am I screwing something up? /nonexistent isn't supposed to be there. Remove it and try again in x11-toolkits/tk84. Cheers, Mezz > Thanks, > Michael -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 23:41:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED4C16A41F; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:41:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFE743D45; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:41:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn [127.0.0.1]) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j6PNfeFC023396; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:41:40 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (uucp@localhost) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id j6PNfe3e023394; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:41:40 +0200 Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.11.4/8.8.5) id j6PNg8l49455; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:42:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen Lock Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:42:08 +0200 To: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <20050726014207.A48961@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mail-Followup-To: Jung-uk Kim , freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20050725222608.A42815@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <200507251825.51540.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: <200507251825.51540.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: need help with kqemu X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:41:45 -0000 On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 06:25:50PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Monday 25 July 2005 04:26 pm, Juergen Lock wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Fabrice has released a new version of kqemu that now also > > supports amd64 hosts, but as he doesnt know FreeBSD (and my > > kernel foo is far from being good enough, neither do i have > > an amd64 box) we need someone to port the wrapper to amd64. > > Actually the i386 wrapper he has now added to the release > > (kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) doesnt work either (not sure what happened > > there, it doesnt even build), so we need someone to fix/update > > that as well. I have made an update for the port that can be > > used as a template (only non-kqemu build works), I'll append it > > below: > > > > Removed files: files/BSDmakefile files/kmod_bsd.c > > New files: files/kqemu-Makefile-patch files/patch-libmath2 > > files/patch-vl.c > > > > (btw patch-vl.c is from Andrey V. Elsukov, it enables kernel > > debugging via virtual serial console, as posted on -ports: > > > > # qemu -hda disk.img -cdrom 6.0-BETA1.iso -serial pty > > # gdb > > (gdb) target remote /dev/ptyp0 > > ....) > > Try the attachment. It seems to build and work on amd64 now, > including kqemu. Hey, nice! So there wasnt actually that much wrong... One question: Does this also work on 4.x? Here's my version: (I disabled a kqemu_vmalloc_to_phys(%p) printf and added back use of the system cc for kqemu) Removed files: files/BSDmakefile, files/kmod_bsd.c New files: files/kqemu-freebsd-patch files/patch-libmath2 files/patch-vl.c Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/qemu/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.27 diff -u -r1.27 Makefile --- Makefile 19 Jul 2005 06:06:56 -0000 1.27 +++ Makefile 25 Jul 2005 23:00:43 -0000 @@ -6,12 +6,9 @@ # PORTNAME= qemu -PORTVERSION= 0.7.0s.20050717 +PORTVERSION= 0.7.1 CATEGORIES= emulators -MASTER_SITES= http://www.qemu.org/ \ - http://people.fruitsalad.org/nox/qemu/ \ - http://dad-answers.com/qemu/ -DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-snapshot-2005-07-17_23 +MASTER_SITES= http://www.qemu.org/ EXTRACT_ONLY= ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX} MAINTAINER= nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de @@ -23,12 +20,12 @@ .endif .if defined(WITH_KQEMU) -DISTKQEMU= kqemu-0.6.2-1.tar.gz +DISTKQEMU= kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz DISTFILES= ${EXTRACT_ONLY} ${DISTKQEMU} +EXTRA_PATCHES= ${FILESDIR}/kqemu-freebsd-patch .endif HAS_CONFIGURE= yes -USE_BZIP2= yes USE_GMAKE= yes USE_GETOPT_LONG= yes USE_SDL= sdl @@ -40,9 +37,11 @@ ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= amd64 i386 .if defined(WITH_KQEMU) NO_PACKAGE= Depends on kernel, and module not redistributable +CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-kqemu PLIST_SUB= WITH_KQEMU="" PLIST_SUB+= KMODDIR=${KMODDIR} .else +CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --disable-kqemu PLIST_SUB= WITH_KQEMU="@comment " .endif @@ -52,7 +51,7 @@ .if ${ARCH} == "amd64" ARCH= x86_64 -.if ${OSVERSION} >= 502126 +.if ${OSVERSION} >= 502126 && ${OSVERSION} <= 600029 BUILD_DEPENDS+= gcc34:${PORTSDIR}/lang/gcc34 GCCVERSION= 030402 CC= gcc34 @@ -63,16 +62,12 @@ USE_GCC= 3.4 .endif -.if defined(WITH_KQEMU) && ${ARCH} != "i386" -IGNORE= kqemu only supported on i386 -.endif - .if defined(WITH_KQEMU) && !exists(${SRC_BASE}/sys/Makefile) IGNORE= kqemu requires kernel source to be installed .endif pre-everything:: -.if !defined(WITH_KQEMU) && ${ARCH} == "i386" +.if !defined(WITH_KQEMU) @${ECHO_MSG} "Notice: you can build qemu with the (alpha!) kqemu accelerator kernel module" @${ECHO_MSG} "by defining WITH_KQEMU." .endif @@ -85,7 +80,7 @@ .if defined(WITH_KQEMU) post-extract: @cd ${WRKSRC} && ${TAR} xfz ${_DISTDIR}/${DISTKQEMU} - @${CP} ${FILESDIR}/BSDmakefile ${FILESDIR}/kmod_bsd.c ${WRKSRC}/kqemu + @${LN} -s Makefile.freebsd ${WRKSRC}/kqemu/BSDmakefile .endif pre-patch: Index: distinfo =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/qemu/distinfo,v retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -r1.20 distinfo --- distinfo 19 Jul 2005 06:06:56 -0000 1.20 +++ distinfo 25 Jul 2005 23:00:43 -0000 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -MD5 (qemu-snapshot-2005-07-17_23.tar.bz2) = 5d21295c1f328ea00de19a54715ee7c3 -SIZE (qemu-snapshot-2005-07-17_23.tar.bz2) = 1114748 -MD5 (kqemu-0.6.2-1.tar.gz) = c6bb3b40fb3d526d731eb0f1f9dee7ee -SIZE (kqemu-0.6.2-1.tar.gz) = 21002 +MD5 (qemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) = b0c80d2c082049a5b8ccbc7f55fe165b +SIZE (qemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) = 1338521 +MD5 (kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) = 8fc7967492b2157521198f6639218420 +SIZE (kqemu-0.7.1.tar.gz) = 76135 Index: files/patch-fbsd =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/qemu/files/patch-fbsd,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 patch-fbsd --- files/patch-fbsd 5 May 2005 12:41:10 -0000 1.2 +++ files/patch-fbsd 25 Jul 2005 23:00:43 -0000 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ $(MAKE) -C kqemu -f Makefile.winnt else - $(MAKE) -C kqemu -+ cd kqemu && $(BSD_MAKE) ++ ( cd kqemu && $(BSD_MAKE) ) endif endif Index: files/kqemu-freebsd-patch @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +--- qemu/configure.orig Mon Jul 25 17:58:33 2005 ++++ qemu/configure Mon Jul 25 17:59:55 2005 +@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ + FreeBSD) + bsd="yes" + oss="yes" +-if [ "$cpu" = "i386" ] ; then ++if [ "$cpu" = "i386" -o "$cpu" = "x86_64" ] ; then + kqemu="yes" + fi + ;; +--- qemu/kqemu/Makefile.freebsd.orig Sun Apr 17 13:21:31 2005 ++++ qemu/kqemu/Makefile.freebsd Mon Jul 25 17:32:48 2005 +@@ -1,6 +1,14 @@ + # $Id: Makefile.freebsd,v 1.1 2005/04/17 17:21:31 bellard Exp $ + KMOD= kqemu +-SRCS= kmod-freebsd.c ++SRCS= kqemu-freebsd.c ++.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386" + OBJS= kqemu-mod-i386.o ++.elif ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" ++OBJS= kqemu-mod-x86_64.o ++.endif ++.if ${OSVERSION} >= 500000 ++CC= cc ++.endif ++WERROR= + + .include +--- qemu/kqemu/kqemu-freebsd.c.orig Mon Apr 25 18:14:40 2005 ++++ qemu/kqemu/kqemu-freebsd.c Mon Jul 25 17:40:17 2005 +@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ + // printf("kqemu_unlock_user_page(%08lx)\n", page_index); + va = (vm_offset_t)page; + ret = vm_map_unwire(&vm->vm_map, va, va+PAGE_SIZE, VM_MAP_WIRE_USER); +- if (ret != KERN_SUCCESS) { +- printf("kqemu_unlock_user_page(%08lx) failed, ret=%d\n", page_index, ret); +- } ++ // if (ret != KERN_SUCCESS) { ++ // printf("kqemu_unlock_user_page(%08lx) failed, ret=%d\n", page_index, ret); ++ // } + } + + /* +@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ + + void CDECL kqemu_free_page(struct kqemu_page *page) + { +- printf("kqemu_free_page(%08lx)\n", page_index); ++ // printf("kqemu_free_page(%08lx)\n", page_index); + /* XXX: do it */ + } + +@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ + printf("kqemu_vmalloc_to_phys(%p)->error\n", vaddr); + return -1; + } +- printf("kqemu_vmalloc_to_phys(%p)->%08x\n", vaddr, pa); ++ /*printf("kqemu_vmalloc_to_phys(%p)->%08x\n", vaddr, pa);*/ + return pa >> PAGE_SHIFT; + } + Index: files/patch-libmath2 @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +Index: qemu/bsd/Makefile +@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ + ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_rintl.c \ + ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_round.c \ + ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_sinl.S \ +- ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_tanl.S ++ ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_tanl.S \ ++ ${MACHINE_ARCH}/s_ldexpl.c + + OBJS= ${SRCS:R:S/$/.o/} + +Index: qemu/bsd/i386/s_ldexpl.c +@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ ++#include ++#include ++#include ++ ++long double __ldexpl(long double x, int expn) ++{ ++ long double res; ++ if (!isfinite (x) || x == 0.0L) ++ return x; ++ ++ __asm__ ("fscale" ++ : "=t" (res) ++ : "0" (x), "u" ((long double) expn)); ++ ++ if (!isfinite (res) || res == 0.0L) ++ errno = ERANGE; ++ ++ return res; ++} ++ ++weak_alias(__ldexpl,ldexpl) +Index: qemu/bsd/amd64/s_ldexpl.c +@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ ++#include ++#include ++#include ++ ++long double __ldexpl(long double x, int expn) ++{ ++ long double res; ++ if (!isfinite (x) || x == 0.0L) ++ return x; ++ ++ __asm__ ("fscale" ++ : "=t" (res) ++ : "0" (x), "u" ((long double) expn)); ++ ++ if (!isfinite (res) || res == 0.0L) ++ errno = ERANGE; ++ ++ return res; ++} ++ ++weak_alias(__ldexpl,ldexpl) +Index: qemu/target-i386/helper.c +@@ -2886,6 +2886,8 @@ + ST0 = floatx_round_to_int(ST0, &env->fp_status); + } + ++long double ldexpl(long double, int); ++ + void helper_fscale(void) + { + ST0 = ldexp (ST0, (int)(ST1)); Index: files/patch-vl.c @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +Index: qemu/vl.c +@@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ + #include + #include + #include ++#ifdef __FreeBSD__ ++#include ++#include ++#endif + #ifdef _BSD + #include + #ifndef __APPLE__ +@@ -1280,7 +1284,7 @@ + return chr; + } + +-#if defined(__linux__) ++#if defined(__linux__) || defined(__FreeBSD__) + CharDriverState *qemu_chr_open_pty(void) + { + char slave_name[1024]; From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 01:44:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61ADC16A41F; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:44:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826AE43D46; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:44:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-08-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.20]) by mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CECF4A80F; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:44:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.48]) by mail-in-08-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC79A85C; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:44:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dsl-213-023-195-130.arcor-ip.net [213.23.195.130]) by mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5125BA8A; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:44:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6Q1i8E9008906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:44:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, piotrekk@excite.com Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:44:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050718230138.44C06AFA87@xprdmailfe5.nwk.excite.com> In-Reply-To: <20050718230138.44C06AFA87@xprdmailfe5.nwk.excite.com> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: clement@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: cannot install ntop from ports on freeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:44:15 -0000 --nextPart1406309.EUfAH6aNH7 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary-01=_jVZ5CfgJ9fwx0Lz" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --Boundary-01=_jVZ5CfgJ9fwx0Lz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 19. July 2005 01:01, PK wrote: > I did rrdtool update, but get still errors: > > rrdPlugin.c: In function `graphCounter': > rrdPlugin.c:583: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph' > rrdPlugin.c: In function `netflowSummary': > rrdPlugin.c:728: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph' > rrdPlugin.c: In function `graphSummary': > rrdPlugin.c:926: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph' > gmake[3]: *** [rrdPlugin.lo] Error 1 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' > gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop' > gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 That's actually a bug in ntop. ntop ships a fork of rrdtool in its sources,= =20 but it does accidentally pick up an incompatible header from an rrdtool=20 installation if there is one. The attached patch should fix things (put it= =20 in /usr/ports/net/ntop/files). =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-01=_jVZ5CfgJ9fwx0Lz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="patch-ntop.h" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="patch-ntop.h" =2D-- ntop.h.orig Tue Jul 26 03:39:16 2005 +++ ntop.h Tue Jul 26 03:39:29 2005 @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ #endif =20 #ifndef EMBEDDED =2D#include "rrd.h" +#include "myrrd/rrd.h" #endif =20 #ifdef HAVE_GETOPT_H --Boundary-01=_jVZ5CfgJ9fwx0Lz-- --nextPart1406309.EUfAH6aNH7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC5ZVnXhc68WspdLARAq9+AKCR+JQ3qM/SfHam/MVDYVQwS5lc2ACgo1dG d+WxSiDJWDCYSHgYR4JNSVM= =umT2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1406309.EUfAH6aNH7-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 01:55:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047F516A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:55:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D46843D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:55:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-06-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-06-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.18]) by mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269965B995; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:55:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.44]) by mail-in-06-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8751242A4; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:55:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dsl-213-023-195-130.arcor-ip.net [213.23.195.130]) by mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05362AAAA; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:55:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6Q1tIf7009085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:55:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:55:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <42DEF1F5.9040306@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <42DEF1F5.9040306@mac.com> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: Subject: Re: Installing .la files for textproc/redland... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:55:23 -0000 --nextPart3002542.H9Eqv3rJ73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 21. July 2005 02:53, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Hi, all-- > > A port which depends on textproc/redland would like to use .la files. > How can I convince the port make stuff to not ignore .la files? Set USE_INC_LIBTOOL_VER=3D15 instead of USE_LIBTOOL_VER=3D15 in the port Ma= kefile. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart3002542.H9Eqv3rJ73 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC5ZgGXhc68WspdLARArK/AJ9GXJE8QF1XdJboY+WSeOpDvTLjOgCgikO1 oNFmiOCQk0xtSxEOjjL4O48= =SWFX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3002542.H9Eqv3rJ73-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 01:57:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FB316A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:57:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (mail-in-07.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5845143D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:57:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-08-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.20]) by mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CBF2AFB2; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:56:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.44]) by mail-in-08-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488766384; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:56:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dsl-213-023-195-130.arcor-ip.net [213.23.195.130]) by mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89DE2AFF2; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:56:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6Q1utKw009093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:56:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, consumidor@mundinho.com.br Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:56:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507221033.56875.consumidor@mundinho.com.br> In-Reply-To: <200507221033.56875.consumidor@mundinho.com.br> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: graphics/kbarcode X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:57:01 -0000 --nextPart4318329.9mnDPKVHl5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday, 22. July 2005 15:33, consumidor wrote: > greetings, > > would you please tell me if there's a chance of upgrading the > graphics/kbarcode port? > they are already at version 1.9.5 on linux, we are at 1.8.1 ports@freebsd.org is a mailinglist and ports with MAINTAINER set to ports@ = are=20 currently unmaintained. If you'd like to see this port updated, consider=20 submitting an update yourself. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart4318329.9mnDPKVHl5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC5ZhnXhc68WspdLARAot4AJ9Hc48KikqOkaO3MlBwjJTWq7VBrwCgjlJR OPR3IM8cnmhZqE0tQkjlpCc= =lTt1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4318329.9mnDPKVHl5-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 04:14:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C15116A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:14:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from mail.rdu.kirov.ru (ns.rdu.kirov.ru [217.9.151.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CFC43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:14:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from kirov.so-cdu.ru (kirov [172.21.81.1]) by mail.rdu.kirov.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241AFFE76; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:14:02 +0400 (MSD) Received: from kirov.so-cdu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rdu.kirov.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id 64CE715C55; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:13:58 +0400 (MSD) Received: by rdu.kirov.ru (Postfix, from userid 1014) id EFB4B15C31; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:13:54 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [172.21.81.52] (elsukov.kirov.so-cdu.ru [172.21.81.52]) by rdu.kirov.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C39E1538F; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:13:02 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <42E5B84E.7010104@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:13:02 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Espen Skoglund References: <42E46118.3000105@yandex.ru> <17124.59796.854955.397959@i30nb20.ira.uka.de> In-Reply-To: <17124.59796.854955.397959@i30nb20.ira.uka.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xmms recode patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:14:23 -0000 Espen Skoglund wrote: > Thanks for patch. However, your modification only works if you > specify that you want to compile with the recode patch. The reason > for the failure is that the file 'files/patch-strlen' is applied > unconditionally. I suggest that you either apply this patch only if > applying the recode patch, or that you integrate the patch into the > recode patch itself. I have send bugreport to rusxmms team and today has received the answer. STRNLEN is fixed in csa28.1 patch. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 15:46:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0858016A420 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:46:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB61543D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:46:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 6A03B29DD; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:46:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:46:33 -0500 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050726154633.GB31333@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Subject: Fwd: cvs commit: ports/lang/q Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:46:35 -0000 This port is now available for adoption. The current maintainter notes that the build problem could probably be fixed by updating to the latest version. mcl ----- Forwarded message from Mark Linimon ----- From: Mark Linimon To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cvs commit: ports/lang/q Makefile X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on pancho.soaustin.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.1 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 linimon 2005-07-26 15:45:05 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: lang/q Makefile Log: Maintainer does not have time to maintain this port any more. Thanks for all your help in the past. Revision Changes Path 1.9 +1 -1 ports/lang/q/Makefile ----- End forwarded message ----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 18:55:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767FE16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:55:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) Received: from smtp-gw-cl-d.dmv.com (smtp-gw-cl-d.dmv.com [216.240.97.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F9243D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:55:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) Received: from lanshark.dmv.com (lanshark.dmv.com [216.240.97.46]) by smtp-gw-cl-d.dmv.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6QItCCf065561; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:55:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) From: Sven Willenberger To: Slony Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:56:18 -0400 Message-Id: <1122404179.1611.43.camel@lanshark.dmv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 216.240.97.42 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Slony I rc startup script on FreeBSD outputs to terminal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:55:15 -0000 slony1-1.1.0 FreeBSD 5.4 (both amd64 and i386) I am having an issue with the ports-supplied startup script that gets installed into /usr/local/etc/rc.d in that regardless of the /usr/local/etc/slon.conf settings, the daemon will not detach from tty (if started via an ssh session for example) and will output message to terminal (in addition to the logfile). For now I have resorted to my old handrolled startup script which basically follows the su slony -c "slon T1 dbname=.... etc 2> slon-db.err 1> slon-db.out &" I would much prefer to use the supplied startup script so that I can use syslog logging (and newsyslog file rotation using the slon.pid). Any ideas on how to get this script to background slony and to suppress all output to terminal? slon.conf: syslog 2 log_level 4 log_timestamp 1 cluster_name T1 conn_info 'dbname=masked user=slony host=localhost port=5432' #sync_interval 100 #sync_interval_timeout 1000 #sync_group_maxsize 6 #vac_frequency 3 #desired_sync_time 60000 Sven From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:12:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B2116A41F; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:12:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2446C43D45; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:12:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (remko@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6QKCFd8082816; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:12:15 GMT (envelope-from remko@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from remko@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6QKCFmN082812; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:12:15 GMT (envelope-from remko) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:12:15 GMT From: Remko Lodder Message-Id: <200507262012.j6QKCFmN082812@freefall.freebsd.org> To: remko@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-www@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: www/84140: www/flashplugin-mozilla causes www/firefox (1.0.3) to crash on 5.4Release, reporting Undefined symbol "XtWindowToWidget" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:12:15 -0000 Synopsis: www/flashplugin-mozilla causes www/firefox (1.0.3) to crash on 5.4Release, reporting Undefined symbol "XtWindowToWidget" Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-www->freebsd-ports Responsible-Changed-By: remko Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jul 26 20:11:51 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: This is actually a port thingy. Bring it to the ports queue. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=84140 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:22:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D39416A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:22:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAB743D49 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:21:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03836B80C; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:21:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1122404179.1611.43.camel@lanshark.dmv.com> References: <1122404179.1611.43.camel@lanshark.dmv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <801B25FD-43FC-4D66-8283-B0E0BFBE494E@khera.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vivek Khera Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:21:58 -0400 To: Slony Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Slony I rc startup script on FreeBSD outputs to terminal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:22:02 -0000 On Jul 26, 2005, at 2:56 PM, Sven Willenberger wrote: > I would much prefer to use the supplied startup script so that I > can use > syslog logging (and newsyslog file rotation using the slon.pid). Any > ideas on how to get this script to background slony and to suppress > all > output to terminal? > I personally don't use it, so haven't spent much time debugging it... I use the slon-mkservice script (which I posted a few hours ago here, tooo) fromth eport and run it via daemontools. Vivek Khera, Ph.D. +1-301-869-4449 x806 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:28:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B9F16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:28:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) Received: from smtp-gw-cl-d.dmv.com (smtp-gw-cl-d.dmv.com [216.240.97.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0FD43D5C for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:28:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) Received: from lanshark.dmv.com (lanshark.dmv.com [216.240.97.46]) by smtp-gw-cl-d.dmv.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6QKSICf069663; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:28:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) From: Sven Willenberger To: Vivek Khera In-Reply-To: <801B25FD-43FC-4D66-8283-B0E0BFBE494E@khera.org> References: <1122404179.1611.43.camel@lanshark.dmv.com> <801B25FD-43FC-4D66-8283-B0E0BFBE494E@khera.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:29:25 -0400 Message-Id: <1122409765.1616.67.camel@lanshark.dmv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 216.240.97.42 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Slony Mailing List Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Slony I rc startup script on FreeBSD outputs to terminal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:28:20 -0000 On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:21 -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > On Jul 26, 2005, at 2:56 PM, Sven Willenberger wrote: > > > I would much prefer to use the supplied startup script so that I > > can use > > syslog logging (and newsyslog file rotation using the slon.pid). Any > > ideas on how to get this script to background slony and to suppress > > all > > output to terminal? > > > > I personally don't use it, so haven't spent much time debugging it... > > I use the slon-mkservice script (which I posted a few hours ago here, > tooo) fromth eport and run it via daemontools. > > Vivek Khera, Ph.D. > +1-301-869-4449 x806 I will take a look at using deamontools then. I had seen the thread to which you refer and that prompted my question (but I didn't want to hijack the thread). Thanks Sven From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 22:35:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBFD16A420; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:35:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9A743D49; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:35:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6QMc4T4065413; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:38:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Juergen Lock Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:35:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20050725222608.A42815@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <200507251825.51540.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20050726014207.A48961@saturn.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <20050726014207.A48961@saturn.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507261835.32168.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.85.1/993/Tue Jul 26 03:28:36 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: need help with kqemu X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:35:49 -0000 On Monday 25 July 2005 07:42 pm, Juergen Lock wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 06:25:50PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > Try the attachment. It seems to build and work on amd64 now, > > including kqemu. > > Hey, nice! So there wasnt actually that much wrong... One > question: Does this also work on 4.x? > > Here's my version: (I disabled a kqemu_vmalloc_to_phys(%p) printf > and added back use of the system cc for kqemu) BTW, I think KQEMU for amd64 is still unstable. VM crashes with error message like this: kqemu: aborting: Unexpected exception 0x0d in monitor space CS:EIP=f180:ffff900000001729 With `-no-kqemu' option, everything's fine. Actually somebody in Linux world also reported somthing similar. In his case, it was just hanging VM, though. Thanks, Jung-uk Kim From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 22:48:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439F716A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:48:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gm@mailbag.co.za) Received: from smtp01.isdsl.net (smtp01.isdsl.net [196.26.208.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E79D43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:48:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gm@mailbag.co.za) Received: from smtp01.isdsl.net (localhost.isdsl.net [127.0.0.1]) by smtp01.isdsl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93B62E2FE for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:48:53 +0200 (SAST) Received: from daemon.rootchaos.za.net (c1-359-1.tpr.isadsl.co.za [196.34.237.105]) by smtp01.isdsl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1482E241 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:48:53 +0200 (SAST) Received: from gmarais.rootchaos.za.net. ([10.0.0.9] helo=gmarais) by daemon.rootchaos.za.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1DxYEL-000183-Nu for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:48:57 +0200 From: "Gawie Marais (Home)" To: Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:57:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 thread-index: AcWSNVhjy0h4GJmWR4+8Yz6dIYKfSw== Message-Id: <20050726224853.AE1482E241@smtp01.isdsl.net> X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP at smtp01.isdsl.net Subject: Amavisd_new Port Install / BerkeleyDB X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gm@mailbag.co.za List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:48:57 -0000 Hi, I have recently installed a new freeBSD 5.4 server running amavisd_new with Spamassassin, all installed from the ports collection. However, when I run try and start amavisd, I get the following error :- [root@filter log]# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/amavisd.sh start Starting amavisd. Problem in Amavis::DB or Amavis::DB::SNMP code: Can't locate loadable object for module BerkeleyDB in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6) at (eval 51) line 11 Compilation failed in require at (eval 51) line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 51) line 11. Undefined subroutine &BerkeleyDB::Term::close_everything called at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/mach/BerkeleyDB.pm line 1649. END failed--call queue aborted. [root@filter log]# Can someone perhaps help me out here with some suggestions to fix the problem or perhaps some explanation why I'm getting this error ? Regards Gawie Marais From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 00:56:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001E616A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:56:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: from excite.com (nn4.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B2C43D45; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:56:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: by xprdmailfe15.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 45ACFB6EA; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:56:05 -0400 (EDT) To: lofi@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, piotrekk@excite.com Received: from [84.73.114.198] by xprdmailfe15.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:56:05 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 2383e4973664c80f7198bf469d15c13b From: "PK" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: piotrekk@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050727005605.45ACFB6EA@xprdmailfe15.nwk.excite.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:56:05 -0400 (EDT) Cc: clement@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: cannot install ntop from ports on freeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: piotrekk@excite.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:56:12 -0000 hi I put the patch to /usr/ports/net/ntop/files, but still have following errors: xmldumpPlugin.c:36:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:37:2: warning: #warning =========================================================== xmldumpPlugin.c:38:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:39:2: warning: #warning The include of gdome.h that follows will generate a lot of xmldumpPlugin.c:40:2: warning: #warning compile warnings about 'shadows a global declaration'. xmldumpPlugin.c:41:2: warning: #warning Unfortunately, it's the way this crud is coded and can't xmldumpPlugin.c:42:2: warning: #warning be fixed. Just ignore them! xmldumpPlugin.c:43:2: warning: #warning In file included from /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib.h:69, from /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:27, from xmldumpPlugin.c:44: /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/gthreadpool.h:88: warning: declaration of 'wait' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/sys/wait.h:103: warning: shadowed declaration is here In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:44: /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:264: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/strings.h:50: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:331: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:483: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:585: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:649: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:694: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:739: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:783: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:801: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:857: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:893: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:935: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:977: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1013: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1033: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/strings.h:50: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1044: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/strings.h:50: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1073: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1112: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here xmldumpPlugin.c:45:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:46:2: warning: #warning =========================================================== xmldumpPlugin.c:47:2: warning: #warning In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1165: xml_s_ntopinterface.inc: In function `newxml_ntopinterface': xml_s_ntopinterface.inc:494: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_s_ntopinterface.inc:529: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_s_ntopinterface.inc:565: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1429: xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc: In function `newxml_simpleprototrafficinfo': xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:46: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:46: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:52: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal2remote' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:52: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal2remote' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:58: error: structure has no member named `lastRem' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:58: error: structure has no member named `lastRem' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:64: error: structure has no member named `lastRem2local' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:64: error: structure has no member named `lastRem2local' In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1693: xml_g_invoke.inc: In function `dumpXML_invoke': xml_g_invoke.inc:71: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_g_invoke.inc:79: error: structure has no member named `accessLogFile' xml_g_invoke.inc:85: error: structure has no member named `enablePacketDecoding' xml_g_invoke.inc:91: error: structure has no member named `stickyHosts' xml_g_invoke.inc:97: error: structure has no member named `daemonMode' xml_g_invoke.inc:103: error: structure has no member named `maxNumLines' xml_g_invoke.inc:110: error: structure has no member named `rFileName' xml_g_invoke.inc:116: error: structure has no member named `trackOnlyLocalHosts' xml_g_invoke.inc:122: error: structure has no member named `devices' xml_g_invoke.inc:128: error: structure has no member named `enableOtherPacketDump' xml_g_invoke.inc:134: error: structure has no member named `filterExpressionInExtraFrame' xml_g_invoke.inc:140: error: structure has no member named `pcapLog' xml_g_invoke.inc:146: error: structure has no member named `localAddresses' xml_g_invoke.inc:152: error: structure has no member named `numericFlag' xml_g_invoke.inc:158: error: structure has no member named `dontTrustMACaddr' xml_g_invoke.inc:164: error: structure has no member named `protoSpecs' xml_g_invoke.inc:170: error: structure has no member named `enableSuspiciousPacketDump' xml_g_invoke.inc:176: error: structure has no member named `refreshRate' xml_g_invoke.inc:183: error: structure has no member named `disablePromiscuousMode' xml_g_invoke.inc:189: error: structure has no member named `traceLevel' xml_g_invoke.inc:196: error: structure has no member named `maxNumHashEntries' xml_g_invoke.inc:203: error: structure has no member named `maxNumSessions' xml_g_invoke.inc:217: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_g_invoke.inc:227: error: structure has no member named `defaultVsan' xml_g_invoke.inc:234: error: structure has no member named `webAddr' xml_g_invoke.inc:240: error: structure has no member named `webPort' xml_g_invoke.inc:247: error: structure has no member named `enableSessionHandling' xml_g_invoke.inc:253: error: structure has no member named `currentFilterExpression' xml_g_invoke.inc:259: error: structure has no member named `domainName' xml_g_invoke.inc:265: error: structure has no member named `flowSpecs' xml_g_invoke.inc:273: error: structure has no member named `debugMode' xml_g_invoke.inc:279: error: structure has no member named `useSyslog' xml_g_invoke.inc:288: error: structure has no member named `mergeInterfaces' xml_g_invoke.inc:294: error: structure has no member named `pcapLogBasePath' xml_g_invoke.inc:300: error: structure has no member named `fcNSCacheFile' xml_g_invoke.inc:318: error: structure has no member named `printFcOnly' xml_g_invoke.inc:324: error: structure has no member named `mapperURL' xml_g_invoke.inc:332: error: structure has no member named `sslAddr' xml_g_invoke.inc:338: error: structure has no member named `sslPort' xml_g_invoke.inc:349: error: structure has no member named `useSSLwatchdog' xml_g_invoke.inc:359: error: structure has no member named `disableSchedYield' xml_g_invoke.inc:367: error: structure has no member named `P3Pcp' xml_g_invoke.inc:373: error: structure has no member named `P3Puri' xml_g_invoke.inc:379: error: structure has no member named `disableStopcap' xml_g_invoke.inc:385: error: structure has no member named `disableInstantSessionPurge' xml_g_invoke.inc:391: error: structure has no member named `noFc' xml_g_invoke.inc:397: error: structure has no member named `noInvalidLunDisplay' xml_g_invoke.inc:403: error: structure has no member named `disableMutexExtraInfo' xml_g_invoke.inc:409: error: structure has no member named `skipVersionCheck' In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1730: xml_g_intf.inc: In function `dumpXML_interfaces': xml_g_intf.inc:33: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' gmake[3]: *** [xmldumpPlugin.lo] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 kind regards piotr --- On Mon 07/25, Michael Nottebrock < lofi@freebsd.org > wrote: From: Michael Nottebrock [mailto: lofi@freebsd.org] To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, piotrekk@excite.com Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, clement@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:44:02 +0200 Subject: Re: cannot install ntop from ports on freeBSD 5.4 On Tuesday, 19. July 2005 01:01, PK wrote:
> I did rrdtool update, but get still errors:
>
> rrdPlugin.c: In function `graphCounter':
> rrdPlugin.c:583: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph'
> rrdPlugin.c: In function `netflowSummary':
> rrdPlugin.c:728: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph'
> rrdPlugin.c: In function `graphSummary':
> rrdPlugin.c:926: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph'
> gmake[3]: *** [rrdPlugin.lo] Error 1
> gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins'
> gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins'
> gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop'
> gmake: *** [all] Error 2
> *** Error code 2

That's actually a bug in ntop. ntop ships a fork of rrdtool in its sources,
but it does accidentally pick up an incompatible header from an rrdtool
installation if there is one. The attached patch should fix things (put it
in /usr/ports/net/ntop/files).

--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
Attachment: patch-ntop.h (0.21KB)
Attachment: Attachment (0.19KB)
_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 01:51:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD44416A421 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:51:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EFA43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:51:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 29472 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 01:51:49 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2005 01:51:49 -0000 Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6R1pk3E024162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:51:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (195-11.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.195.11]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6R1pdx4079124 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:51:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (mteterin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6R1pYvZ073339 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:51:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6R1pXFP073338 for ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:51:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mteterin.us.murex.com: mteterin set sender to mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com using -f From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:51:33 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507262151.33753.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV devel-20050525/993/Tue Jul 26 03:28:36 2005 on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: Subject: a portlint dilemma X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:51:51 -0000 Hello! I'd like to set the default value for a new port's OPTION depending on the MACHINE_ARCH ("on" for i386, "off" for others). However, portlint would not let me. MACHINE_ARCH can only be used _after_ including mk.ports.pre.mk, and OPTIONS can only be modified _before_ it. Any suggestions? Can I just ignore this "fatal" issue? -mi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 01:57:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1203816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:57:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851D243D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:56:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 31802 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 01:56:59 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2005 01:56:58 -0000 Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6R1utSa024181 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:56:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (195-11.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.195.11]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6R1unRp079143 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:56:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (mteterin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6R1uhpU073390 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:56:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6R1uhgS073389 for ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:56:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mteterin.us.murex.com: mteterin set sender to mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com using -f From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: ports@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-UID: 1079863 X-Length: 1010 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:56:43 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507262156.43233.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV devel-20050525/993/Tue Jul 26 03:28:36 2005 on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: Subject: a portlint dilemma X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:57:00 -0000 Hello! You are the portlint maintainer, so I'll ask you directly :-) I'd like to set the default value for a new port's OPTION depending on the ARCH ("on" for i386, "off" for others). However, portlint would not let me. ARCH can only be used _after_ including mk.ports.pre.mk, and OPTIONS can only be modified _before_ it. Any suggestions? Can I just ignore this "fatal" issue? -mi P.S. I wrote MACHINE_ARCH instead of ARCH in my letter to ports@ -- please, ignore. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 02:42:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E30216A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:42:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4329543D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:42:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 24ED629E5; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:42:31 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:42:31 -0500 To: Mikhail Teterin Message-ID: <20050727024231.GA18447@soaustin.net> References: <200507262156.43233.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507262156.43233.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a portlint dilemma X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:42:32 -0000 On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 09:56:43PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > I'd like to set the default value for a new port's OPTION depending on the > ARCH ("on" for i386, "off" for others). > > However, portlint would not let me. ARCH can only be used _after_ > including bsd.port.pre.mk, and OPTIONS can only be modified _before_ it. If I understand things correctly, this is a design limitation of bsd.port.mk, not a bug in portlint. The definition of ARCH is not picked up until you include bsd.port.pre.mk, so it is meaningless before then: portlint is telling you the truth here. I think what you will need to do in this case is define your own local copy of the variable (e.g. LOCAL_ARCH!=${UNAME} -p) and then define your OPTIONS from there. There are some chicken-and-egg problems like this in bsd.port.mk (well, the part that is invoked by bsd.port.pre.mk). At one time I understood which each of them was but I haven't looked at them in a long time. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 03:17:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9468816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:17:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from mail3out.barnet.com.au (mail3out.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F6543D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:17:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by mail3out.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 27) id 1B344877C94; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:17:17 +1000 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <42E6FCBD000067FDE29FA3@BarNet> Received: from mail3-auth.barnet.com.au (mail3.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.barnet.com.au", Issuer "BarNet Root Certificate Authority" (verified OK)) by mail3.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D49877C8F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:17:16 +1000 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (252-131-222-203.rev.techex.net.au [203.222.131.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "edwin.adsl.barnet.com.au", Issuer "BarNet Root Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mail3-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98407877C91; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:17:12 +1000 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F361F612B; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:17:10 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:17:10 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Mikhail Teterin Message-ID: <20050727031710.GE1186@k7.mavetju> References: <200507262156.43233.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507262156.43233.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a portlint dilemma X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:17:19 -0000 On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 09:56:43PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Hello! You are the portlint maintainer, so I'll ask you directly :-) > > I'd like to set the default value for a new port's OPTION depending on the > ARCH ("on" for i386, "off" for others). > > However, portlint would not let me. ARCH can only be used _after_ > including mk.ports.pre.mk, and OPTIONS can only be modified _before_ it. > > Any suggestions? Can I just ignore this "fatal" issue? I would just add it to the options statement: OPTIONS= foo "Use foo (i386 only)" on \ bar "Use bar (PowerPC only)" off Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 03:27:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E495816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:27:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A91143D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:27:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 32329 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 03:27:43 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2005 03:27:42 -0000 Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6R3RbH0024360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:27:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (195-11.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.195.11]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6R3RUXs079846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:27:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (mteterin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6R3RPB2066336; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:27:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6R3ROkS066335; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:27:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mteterin.us.murex.com: mteterin set sender to mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com using -f From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: Mark Linimon Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:27:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507262156.43233.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050727024231.GA18447@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20050727024231.GA18447@soaustin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507262327.24793.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV devel-20050525/993/Tue Jul 26 03:28:36 2005 on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a portlint dilemma X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:27:44 -0000 > There are some chicken-and-egg problems like this in bsd.port.mk (well, > the part that is invoked by bsd.port.pre.mk). At one time I understood > which each of them was but I haven't looked at them in a long time. Actually, I think, I found the way. Look at the new GraphicsMagick port. portlint would've raised hell about this trick (if it new about variable modifiers), but that would be groundless. ARCH is not expanded until OPTIONS is used (by which time ARCH is already known), so things work just fine. A more straightforward way would be to: OPTIONS= MEOW "MEOW?" ${MEOW_on_off} .include .if ${ARCH} == "i386" MEOW_on_off= on .else MEOW_on_off= off .endif .include This is also fooling portlint -- OPTIONS are, in fact, modified after including the ...pre.mk. And there is nothing wrong with that :-) -mi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 04:10:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E958E16A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:10:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A159643D48; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:10:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (remko@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6R4ALBq046815; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:10:21 GMT (envelope-from remko@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from remko@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6R4ALHJ046811; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:10:21 GMT (envelope-from remko) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:10:21 GMT From: Remko Lodder Message-Id: <200507270410.j6R4ALHJ046811@freefall.freebsd.org> To: remko@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/84140: www/flashplugin-mozilla causes www/firefox (1.0.3) to crash on 5.4Release, reporting Undefined symbol "XtWindowToWidget" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:10:23 -0000 Synopsis: www/flashplugin-mozilla causes www/firefox (1.0.3) to crash on 5.4Release, reporting Undefined symbol "XtWindowToWidget" Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: remko Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jul 27 04:09:32 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Oeps, Ceri pointed to me that there is freebsd-ports-bugs, sent it there instead and corrected the Category. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=84140 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 05:17:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AD716A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:17:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: from connectmail.carleton.ca (connectmail.carleton.ca [134.117.2.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025AF43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:17:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (adsl-67-123-68-209.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [67.123.68.209]) by connectmail.carleton.ca (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built Feb 8 2005)) with ESMTPSA id <0IK9002H1TDSHI@connectmail.carleton.ca> for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:17:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:17:50 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger In-reply-to: <200507262327.24793.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: Mikhail Teterin Message-id: <42E718FE.4070506@magnesium.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0+ (Macintosh/20050712) References: <200507262156.43233.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050727024231.GA18447@soaustin.net> <200507262327.24793.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: a portlint dilemma X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:17:53 -0000 Mikhail Teterin wrote: >> There are some chicken-and-egg problems like this in bsd.port.mk (well, >> the part that is invoked by bsd.port.pre.mk). At one time I understood >> which each of them was but I haven't looked at them in a long time. > > Actually, I think, I found the way. Look at the new GraphicsMagick port. > > portlint would've raised hell about this trick (if it new about variable > modifiers), but that would be groundless. ARCH is not expanded until OPTIONS > is used (by which time ARCH is already known), so things work just fine. > > A more straightforward way would be to: > > OPTIONS= MEOW "MEOW?" ${MEOW_on_off} > > .include > > .if ${ARCH} == "i386" > MEOW_on_off= on > .else > MEOW_on_off= off > .endif > > .include > > This is also fooling portlint -- OPTIONS are, in fact, modified after > including the ...pre.mk. And there is nothing wrong with that :-) > > -mi That is indeed a very good - albeit sneaky - trick! The main problem that I find with the OPTIONS chicken-and-egg problem is that you can't modify OPTIONS based on the presence of files because, when OPTIONS processing takes place, LOCALBASE and X11BASE aren't defined. Do you have a good sneaky trick for that case? # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 05:48:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6949816A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:48:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13BF43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:48:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 3393 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 05:48:48 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com (HELO blue.virtual-estates.net) ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2005 05:48:48 -0000 Received: from blue.virtual-estates.net (blue [127.0.0.1]) by blue.virtual-estates.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6R5mkH9043493; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:48:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by blue.virtual-estates.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6R5mkFV043492; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:48:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: blue.virtual-estates.net: mi set sender to mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com using -f From: Mikhail Teterin To: Adam Weinberger Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:48:45 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507262156.43233.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <200507262327.24793.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <42E718FE.4070506@magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <42E718FE.4070506@magnesium.net> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: a portlint dilemma X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:48:49 -0000 On Wednesday 27 July 2005 01:17 am, Adam Weinberger wrote: = That is indeed a very good - albeit sneaky - trick! I wonder, what portlint's intention is in this case. Is it to really prevent things like I wanted in GraphicsMagick or just to make ports' Makefiles more uniform (in which case this should be a warning, not a "fatal" error). = The main problem that I find with the OPTIONS chicken-and-egg problem = is that you can't modify OPTIONS based on the presence of files = because, when OPTIONS processing takes place, LOCALBASE and X11BASE = aren't defined. Do you have a good sneaky trick for that case? There is no chicken-and-egg problem, because the variables are not expanded until used (or until assigned to others with ``:=''). How about: OPTIONS=MEOW "Use libMEOW for additional purring?" ${MEOW} .include .if exists(${LOCALBASE}/lib/libMEOW.so) MEOW= on .else MEOW= off .endif .include Does this work? Is it, what you are asking about? -mi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 06:48:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7C016A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:48:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noracentral@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0684243D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:48:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noracentral@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2005 06:48:45 -0000 Received: from adsl-241-18-fixip.tiscali.ch (EHLO [192.168.0.2]) [212.254.241.18] by mail.gmx.net (mp014) with SMTP; 27 Jul 2005 08:48:45 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1419609 Message-ID: <42E72E3F.3020607@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:48:31 +0200 From: nora central User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Lighttpd, FastCGI use with php5 (freebsd 5.4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noracentral@gmx.net List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:48:47 -0000 Halo I wish run command as make, make install in /usr/ports/lang/php5. Need some modifycation to build php5 for FastCGI (Lighttpd). Thanks nora From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 07:03:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2E316A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:03:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert.mintram@unn.ac.uk) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFA343D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:03:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert.mintram@unn.ac.uk) Received: from 192.168.11.4 ([82.39.32.49]) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:03:52 +0100 From: Robert Mintram To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:03:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1122447785.20063.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jul 2005 07:03:52.0927 (UTC) FILETIME=[58D96EF0:01C59279] Cc: Subject: bscv X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:03:09 -0000 Hi Has anyone managed to port this product to Fedora Linux? I have tried but I run into many problems with the compiler. Particularly C++. The code seems to use features that now cause a compilation error. Alternatively, does anyone know of a m68k simulator that works under Fedora Linux? Regards Bob Mintram Senior Lecturer University of Northumbria From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 07:06:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B47C16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:06:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE68943D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:06:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 61080 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 07:06:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.5?) (192.168.2.5) by andxor.it with SMTP; 27 Jul 2005 07:06:53 -0000 Message-ID: <42E7328C.6050807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:06:52 +0200 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (X11/20050715) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: noracentral@gmx.net References: <42E72E3F.3020607@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <42E72E3F.3020607@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lighttpd, FastCGI use with php5 (freebsd 5.4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:06:57 -0000 nora central wrote: > I wish run command as make, make install in /usr/ports/lang/php5. > Need some modifycation to build php5 for FastCGI (Lighttpd). Probably you need www/php5-cgi. -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 08:20:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8585916A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:20:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from huang@gddsn.org.cn) Received: from gddsn.org.cn (gddsn.org.cn [218.19.164.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A973B43D45; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:20:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from huang@gddsn.org.cn) Received: from [192.168.4.81] (unknown [210.72.96.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gddsn.org.cn (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF95B38CB59; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:20:54 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <42E743E7.5070000@gddsn.org.cn> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:20:55 +0800 From: Huang wen hui User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050507) X-Accept-Language: zh-cn,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: freetype2-2.1.10 broken JDK X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:20:58 -0000 hi, I am using JDK1.5.0 + chinese locale(zh_CN.UTF-8) under CURRENT, I use truetype font in fontconfig.properties. freetype2-2.1.10 broke JDK1.5.0 now revert to freetype2-2.1.9 solve this problem. It also broken JDK1.4.2 %setenv USER=hwh MAIL=/var/mail/hwh HOME=/home/hwh LOGNAME=hwh BLOCKSIZE=K PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/hwh/bin DISPLAY=:0.0 SHELL=/bin/csh FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES HOSTTYPE=FreeBSD VENDOR=intel OSTYPE=FreeBSD MACHTYPE=i386 PWD=/usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib GROUP=wheel HOST=tp.gddsn.org.cn EDITOR=vi PAGER=more CVSROOT=:pserver:hwh@gw:/home/CVS LC_ALL=zh_CN.UTF-8 LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 GLOBUS_LOCATION=/home/hwh/globus XMODIFIERS=@im=fcitx GTK_RC_FILES=/usr/X11R6/etc/gtk/gtkrc:/home/hwh/.gtkrc-1.2-gnome2 SESSION_MANAGER=local/tp.gddsn.org.cn:/tmp/.ICE-unix/40876 GNOME_KEYRING_SOCKET=/var/tmp/keyring-MrzstL/socket GNOME_DESKTOP_SESSION_ID=Default TERM=xterm COLORTERM=gnome-terminal WINDOWID=27263197 SHLVL=1 %cat fontconfig.properties # @(#)FreeBSD.fontconfig.6.0.properties 1.4 03/11/14 # # Copyright 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. # # Version version=1 # Component Font Mappings #allfonts.chinese-gb2312=-misc-simsun-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0 #allfonts.chinese-gb2312.motif=-isas-song ti-medium-r-normal--*-%d-*-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0 allfonts.chinese-gb2312=-misc-ar pl new sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0 allfonts.chinese-gb2312.motif=-misc-ar pl new sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0 allfonts.chinese-gb18030-0=-misc-ar pl new sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-0 allfonts.chinese-gb18030-0.motif=-misc-ar pl new sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-0 allfonts.chinese-gb18030-1=-misc-ar pl new sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-1 allfonts.chinese-gb18030-1.motif=-misc-ar pl new sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-1 allfonts.lucida=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 serif.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidabright-medium-r-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 serif.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidabright-demibold-r-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 serif.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidabright-medium-i-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 serif.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidabright-demibold-i-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 sansserif.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 sansserif.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-bold-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 sansserif.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 sansserif.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-bold-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 monospaced.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 monospaced.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 monospaced.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 monospaced.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 dialog.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 dialog.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-bold-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 dialog.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 dialog.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-bold-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 dialoginput.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 dialoginput.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 dialoginput.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 dialoginput.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 # Search Sequences sequence.allfonts=latin-1-lt sequence.allfonts.GB2312=latin-1,chinese-gb2312 sequence.allfonts.UTF-8=latin-1,chinese-gb18030-1,chinese-gb18030-0,chinese-gb2312 sequence.allfonts.GBK=latin-1,chinese-gb2312 # the fallback sequence omits the following character subsets: # - japanese-x0208: same files as japanese-x0201 sequence.fallback=lucida,chinese-big5,chinese-gb18030,\ japanese-x0201,korean # Exclusion Ranges # Font File Names #filename.-misc-simsun-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/simsun.ttc # AWT X11 font paths awtfontpath.latin-1=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 awtfontpath.latin-1-lt=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 awtfontpath.chinese-gb2312=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType awtfontpath.chinese-gb18030-0=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType awtfontpath.chinese-gb18030-1=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType tp# gdb -core /Xorg.core /usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"... Core was generated by `Xorg'. Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. Reading symbols from /lib/libz.so.3...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libz.so.3 Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.4...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.4 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXau.so.0...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXau.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXdmcp.so.0...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXdmcp.so.0 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libfreetype.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libfreetype.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #0 0x2831844b in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x2831844b in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x283183e8 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x283170fc in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 #3 0x0806d8c3 in ddxGiveUp () at xf86Init.c:1228 #4 0x0806d9b6 in AbortDDX () at xf86Init.c:1283 #5 0x08106288 in AbortServer () at log.c:395 #6 0x0810659a in FatalError (f=0x81f435c "Caught signal %d. Server aborting\n") at log.c:541 #7 0x080898be in xf86SigHandler (signo=11) at xf86Events.c:1298 #8 0xbfbfff94 in ?? () #9 0x0000000b in ?? () #10 0x0000000c in ?? () #11 0xbfbfd040 in ?? () #12 0x00000000 in ?? () #13 0x08089830 in xf86InterceptSignals () at xf86Events.c:1270 #14 0x2834d8d8 in FreeTypeRasteriseGlyph (idx=0, flags=1, tgp=0x8f66700, instance=0x8f69400, hasMetrics=0) at ftfuncs.c:1034 #15 0x2834cb56 in FreeTypeInstanceGetGlyph (idx=0, flags=1, g=0xbfbfd62c, instance=0x8f69400) at ftfuncs.c:643 #16 0x28354018 in FreeTypeLoadXFont (fileName=0xbfbfdcc0 "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/fn=0:vl=y:simsun.ttc", vals=0xbfbfdc40, xf=0x8ea4a00, info=0x8ea4a04, bmfmt=0xbfbfd7b0, entry=0x8c50bb4) at ftfuncs.c:3362 #17 0x28354a25 in FreeTypeOpenScalable (fpe=0x8c83940, ppFont=0xbfbfe964, flags=0, entry=0x8c50bb4, fileName=0xbfbfdcc0 "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/fn=0:vl=y:simsun.ttc", vals=0xbfbfdc40, format=512, fmask=31, non_cachable_font=0x0) at ftfuncs.c:3743 #18 0x0811410b in FontFileOpenFont (client=0x8f65c00, fpe=0x8c83940, flags=0, name=0x8eacac0 "-misc-simsun-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-1o8859-1\b\200\uffff\227\b\200\uffff\233\b\uffff\uffff\233\b\uffff\uffff\233\b\uffff\236\uffff\b`8\uffff\b\uffff8\uffff\b@9\uffff\b`\213\uffff\b-75-75-p-0-iso8859-3", namelen=56, format=512, fmask=31, id=8388618, pFont=0xbfbfe964, aliasName=0xbfbfe950, non_cachable_font=0x0) at fontfile.c:433 #19 0x080f7f09 in doOpenFont (client=0x8f65c00, c=0x8eaca80) at dixfonts.c:294 #20 0x080f83cc in OpenFont (client=0x8f65c00, fid=8388618, flags=0, lenfname=56, pfontname=0x8e9f00c "-misc-simsun-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-1\230\001\003") at dixfonts.c:469 #21 0x080ced41 in ProcOpenFont (client=0x8f65c00) at dispatch.c:1312 #22 0x080cd158 in Dispatch () at dispatch.c:455 #23 0x080e35dc in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfbfeea8, envp=0xbfbfeeb8) at main.c:442 (gdb) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 08:58:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5759616A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:58:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from fly.ebs.gr (fly.ebs.gr [62.103.84.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6AC43D45; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:58:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from ebs.gr (root@hal.ebs.gr [10.1.1.2]) by fly.ebs.gr (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6R8wYKU070171; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:58:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from [10.1.1.184] (ajax.ebs.gr [10.1.1.184]) by ebs.gr (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6R8wSUe020219; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:58:33 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.338 [267.9.5]); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:58:27 +0300 Message-ID: <42E74CB3.1030101@ebs.gr> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:58:27 +0300 From: Panagiotis Astithas Organization: EBS Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Huang wen hui References: <42E743E7.5070000@gddsn.org.cn> In-Reply-To: <42E743E7.5070000@gddsn.org.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freetype2-2.1.10 broken JDK X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:58:41 -0000 Huang wen hui wrote: > hi, > I am using JDK1.5.0 + chinese locale(zh_CN.UTF-8) under CURRENT, I use > truetype font in fontconfig.properties. > freetype2-2.1.10 broke JDK1.5.0 now revert to freetype2-2.1.9 solve this > problem. It also broken JDK1.4.2 > > %setenv > USER=hwh > MAIL=/var/mail/hwh > HOME=/home/hwh > LOGNAME=hwh > BLOCKSIZE=K > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/hwh/bin > DISPLAY=:0.0 > SHELL=/bin/csh > FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES > HOSTTYPE=FreeBSD > VENDOR=intel > OSTYPE=FreeBSD > MACHTYPE=i386 > PWD=/usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib > GROUP=wheel > HOST=tp.gddsn.org.cn > EDITOR=vi > PAGER=more > CVSROOT=:pserver:hwh@gw:/home/CVS > LC_ALL=zh_CN.UTF-8 > LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 > GLOBUS_LOCATION=/home/hwh/globus > XMODIFIERS=@im=fcitx > GTK_RC_FILES=/usr/X11R6/etc/gtk/gtkrc:/home/hwh/.gtkrc-1.2-gnome2 > SESSION_MANAGER=local/tp.gddsn.org.cn:/tmp/.ICE-unix/40876 > GNOME_KEYRING_SOCKET=/var/tmp/keyring-MrzstL/socket > GNOME_DESKTOP_SESSION_ID=Default > TERM=xterm > COLORTERM=gnome-terminal > WINDOWID=27263197 > SHLVL=1 > > %cat fontconfig.properties > # @(#)FreeBSD.fontconfig.6.0.properties 1.4 03/11/14 > # > # Copyright 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. > # > > # Version > > version=1 > > # Component Font Mappings > > #allfonts.chinese-gb2312=-misc-simsun-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0 > #allfonts.chinese-gb2312.motif=-isas-song > ti-medium-r-normal--*-%d-*-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0 > allfonts.chinese-gb2312=-misc-ar pl new > sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0 > allfonts.chinese-gb2312.motif=-misc-ar pl new > sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0 > allfonts.chinese-gb18030-0=-misc-ar pl new > sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-0 > allfonts.chinese-gb18030-0.motif=-misc-ar pl new > sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-0 > allfonts.chinese-gb18030-1=-misc-ar pl new > sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-1 > allfonts.chinese-gb18030-1.motif=-misc-ar pl new > sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-1 > allfonts.lucida=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > > > serif.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidabright-medium-r-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > serif.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidabright-demibold-r-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > serif.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidabright-medium-i-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > serif.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidabright-demibold-i-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > > sansserif.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > sansserif.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-bold-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > sansserif.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > sansserif.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-bold-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > > monospaced.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 > monospaced.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 > monospaced.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 > monospaced.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 > > dialog.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > dialog.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-bold-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > dialog.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > dialog.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-bold-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 > > dialoginput.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 > dialoginput.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 > dialoginput.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 > dialoginput.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 > > # Search Sequences > > sequence.allfonts=latin-1-lt > > sequence.allfonts.GB2312=latin-1,chinese-gb2312 > sequence.allfonts.UTF-8=latin-1,chinese-gb18030-1,chinese-gb18030-0,chinese-gb2312 > sequence.allfonts.GBK=latin-1,chinese-gb2312 > > # the fallback sequence omits the following character subsets: > # - japanese-x0208: same files as japanese-x0201 > sequence.fallback=lucida,chinese-big5,chinese-gb18030,\ > japanese-x0201,korean > > # Exclusion Ranges > > # Font File Names > > #filename.-misc-simsun-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/simsun.ttc > > # AWT X11 font paths > awtfontpath.latin-1=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 > awtfontpath.latin-1-lt=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 > awtfontpath.chinese-gb2312=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType > awtfontpath.chinese-gb18030-0=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType > awtfontpath.chinese-gb18030-1=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType > > > tp# gdb -core /Xorg.core /usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain > conditions. > Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. > This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"... > Core was generated by `Xorg'. > Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. > Reading symbols from /lib/libz.so.3...done. > Loaded symbols for /lib/libz.so.3 > Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.4...done. > Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.4 > Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXau.so.0...done. > Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXau.so.0 > Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXdmcp.so.0...done. > Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXdmcp.so.0 > Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done. > Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6 > Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libfreetype.so...done. > Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libfreetype.so > Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9...done. > Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 > Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...done. > Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > #0 0x2831844b in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6 > (gdb) bt > #0 0x2831844b in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #1 0x283183e8 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #2 0x283170fc in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #3 0x0806d8c3 in ddxGiveUp () at xf86Init.c:1228 > #4 0x0806d9b6 in AbortDDX () at xf86Init.c:1283 > #5 0x08106288 in AbortServer () at log.c:395 > #6 0x0810659a in FatalError (f=0x81f435c "Caught signal %d. Server > aborting\n") at log.c:541 > #7 0x080898be in xf86SigHandler (signo=11) at xf86Events.c:1298 > #8 0xbfbfff94 in ?? () > #9 0x0000000b in ?? () > #10 0x0000000c in ?? () > #11 0xbfbfd040 in ?? () > #12 0x00000000 in ?? () > #13 0x08089830 in xf86InterceptSignals () at xf86Events.c:1270 > #14 0x2834d8d8 in FreeTypeRasteriseGlyph (idx=0, flags=1, tgp=0x8f66700, > instance=0x8f69400, hasMetrics=0) at ftfuncs.c:1034 > #15 0x2834cb56 in FreeTypeInstanceGetGlyph (idx=0, flags=1, > g=0xbfbfd62c, instance=0x8f69400) at ftfuncs.c:643 > #16 0x28354018 in FreeTypeLoadXFont (fileName=0xbfbfdcc0 > "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/fn=0:vl=y:simsun.ttc", > vals=0xbfbfdc40, xf=0x8ea4a00, > info=0x8ea4a04, bmfmt=0xbfbfd7b0, entry=0x8c50bb4) at ftfuncs.c:3362 > #17 0x28354a25 in FreeTypeOpenScalable (fpe=0x8c83940, > ppFont=0xbfbfe964, flags=0, entry=0x8c50bb4, > fileName=0xbfbfdcc0 > "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/fn=0:vl=y:simsun.ttc", > vals=0xbfbfdc40, format=512, fmask=31, non_cachable_font=0x0) > at ftfuncs.c:3743 > #18 0x0811410b in FontFileOpenFont (client=0x8f65c00, fpe=0x8c83940, > flags=0, > name=0x8eacac0 > "-misc-simsun-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-1o8859-1\b\200\uffff\227\b\200\uffff\233\b\uffff\uffff\233\b\uffff\uffff\233\b\uffff\236\uffff\b`8\uffff\b\uffff8\uffff\b@9\uffff\b`\213\uffff\b-75-75-p-0-iso8859-3", > namelen=56, format=512, fmask=31, id=8388618, pFont=0xbfbfe964, > aliasName=0xbfbfe950, non_cachable_font=0x0) at fontfile.c:433 > #19 0x080f7f09 in doOpenFont (client=0x8f65c00, c=0x8eaca80) at > dixfonts.c:294 > #20 0x080f83cc in OpenFont (client=0x8f65c00, fid=8388618, flags=0, > lenfname=56, > pfontname=0x8e9f00c > "-misc-simsun-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-1\230\001\003") > at dixfonts.c:469 > #21 0x080ced41 in ProcOpenFont (client=0x8f65c00) at dispatch.c:1312 > #22 0x080cd158 in Dispatch () at dispatch.c:455 > #23 0x080e35dc in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfbfeea8, envp=0xbfbfeeb8) at > main.c:442 > (gdb) Just curious, but why you say that the jdk is broken? As far as I can see you have a core file from X and the stack trace shows no mention of java native libraries. It appears that maybe freetype2-2.1.10 broke Xorg, but not java. Am I missing something? Cheers, Panagiotis From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 09:55:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079D216A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:55:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hwh@gddsn.org.cn) Received: from gddsn.org.cn (gddsn.org.cn [218.19.164.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C119D43D46; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:55:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hwh@gddsn.org.cn) Received: from [192.168.4.81] (unknown [210.72.96.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gddsn.org.cn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DDE38CB4D; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:55:09 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <42E759FE.3020406@gddsn.org.cn> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:55:10 +0800 From: Huang wen hui User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050507) X-Accept-Language: zh-cn,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Panagiotis Astithas References: <42E743E7.5070000@gddsn.org.cn> <42E74CB3.1030101@ebs.gr> In-Reply-To: <42E74CB3.1030101@ebs.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, java@freebsd.org, Huang wen hui Subject: Re: freetype2-2.1.10 broken JDK X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:55:15 -0000 Panagiotis Astithas дµÀ: >Huang wen hui wrote: > > >>hi, >>I am using JDK1.5.0 + chinese locale(zh_CN.UTF-8) under CURRENT, I use >>truetype font in fontconfig.properties. >>freetype2-2.1.10 broke JDK1.5.0 now revert to freetype2-2.1.9 solve this >>problem. It also broken JDK1.4.2 >> >>%setenv >>USER=hwh >>MAIL=/var/mail/hwh >>HOME=/home/hwh >>LOGNAME=hwh >>BLOCKSIZE=K >>PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/hwh/bin >>DISPLAY=:0.0 >>SHELL=/bin/csh >>FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES >>HOSTTYPE=FreeBSD >>VENDOR=intel >>OSTYPE=FreeBSD >>MACHTYPE=i386 >>PWD=/usr/local/jdk1.5.0/jre/lib >>GROUP=wheel >>HOST=tp.gddsn.org.cn >>EDITOR=vi >>PAGER=more >>CVSROOT=:pserver:hwh@gw:/home/CVS >>LC_ALL=zh_CN.UTF-8 >>LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 >>GLOBUS_LOCATION=/home/hwh/globus >>XMODIFIERS=@im=fcitx >>GTK_RC_FILES=/usr/X11R6/etc/gtk/gtkrc:/home/hwh/.gtkrc-1.2-gnome2 >>SESSION_MANAGER=local/tp.gddsn.org.cn:/tmp/.ICE-unix/40876 >>GNOME_KEYRING_SOCKET=/var/tmp/keyring-MrzstL/socket >>GNOME_DESKTOP_SESSION_ID=Default >>TERM=xterm >>COLORTERM=gnome-terminal >>WINDOWID=27263197 >>SHLVL=1 >> >>%cat fontconfig.properties >># @(#)FreeBSD.fontconfig.6.0.properties 1.4 03/11/14 >># >># Copyright 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. >># >> >># Version >> >>version=1 >> >># Component Font Mappings >> >>#allfonts.chinese-gb2312=-misc-simsun-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0 >>#allfonts.chinese-gb2312.motif=-isas-song >>ti-medium-r-normal--*-%d-*-*-c-*-gb2312.1980-0 >>allfonts.chinese-gb2312=-misc-ar pl new >>sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0 >>allfonts.chinese-gb2312.motif=-misc-ar pl new >>sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0 >>allfonts.chinese-gb18030-0=-misc-ar pl new >>sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-0 >>allfonts.chinese-gb18030-0.motif=-misc-ar pl new >>sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-0 >>allfonts.chinese-gb18030-1=-misc-ar pl new >>sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-1 >>allfonts.chinese-gb18030-1.motif=-misc-ar pl new >>sung-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-1 >>allfonts.lucida=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >> >> >>serif.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidabright-medium-r-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >>serif.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidabright-demibold-r-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >>serif.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidabright-medium-i-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >>serif.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidabright-demibold-i-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >> >>sansserif.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >>sansserif.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-bold-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >>sansserif.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >>sansserif.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-bold-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >> >>monospaced.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 >>monospaced.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 >>monospaced.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 >>monospaced.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 >> >>dialog.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >>dialog.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-bold-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >>dialog.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-medium-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >>dialog.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidasans-bold-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 >> >>dialoginput.plain.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 >>dialoginput.bold.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 >>dialoginput.italic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 >>dialoginput.bolditalic.latin-1=-b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-i-normal-sans-*-%d-*-*-m-*-iso8859-1 >> >># Search Sequences >> >>sequence.allfonts=latin-1-lt >> >>sequence.allfonts.GB2312=latin-1,chinese-gb2312 >>sequence.allfonts.UTF-8=latin-1,chinese-gb18030-1,chinese-gb18030-0,chinese-gb2312 >>sequence.allfonts.GBK=latin-1,chinese-gb2312 >> >># the fallback sequence omits the following character subsets: >># - japanese-x0208: same files as japanese-x0201 >>sequence.fallback=lucida,chinese-big5,chinese-gb18030,\ >>japanese-x0201,korean >> >># Exclusion Ranges >> >># Font File Names >> >>#filename.-misc-simsun-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/simsun.ttc >> >># AWT X11 font paths >>awtfontpath.latin-1=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 >>awtfontpath.latin-1-lt=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 >>awtfontpath.chinese-gb2312=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType >>awtfontpath.chinese-gb18030-0=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType >>awtfontpath.chinese-gb18030-1=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType >> >> >>tp# gdb -core /Xorg.core /usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg >>GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] >>Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >>GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are >>welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain >>conditions. >>Type "show copying" to see the conditions. >>There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. >>This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"... >>Core was generated by `Xorg'. >>Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. >>Reading symbols from /lib/libz.so.3...done. >>Loaded symbols for /lib/libz.so.3 >>Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.4...done. >>Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.4 >>Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXau.so.0...done. >>Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXau.so.0 >>Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXdmcp.so.0...done. >>Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXdmcp.so.0 >>Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done. >>Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6 >>Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libfreetype.so...done. >>Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libfreetype.so >>Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9...done. >>Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 >>Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...done. >>Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 >>#0 0x2831844b in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6 >>(gdb) bt >>#0 0x2831844b in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6 >>#1 0x283183e8 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 >>#2 0x283170fc in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 >>#3 0x0806d8c3 in ddxGiveUp () at xf86Init.c:1228 >>#4 0x0806d9b6 in AbortDDX () at xf86Init.c:1283 >>#5 0x08106288 in AbortServer () at log.c:395 >>#6 0x0810659a in FatalError (f=0x81f435c "Caught signal %d. Server >>aborting\n") at log.c:541 >>#7 0x080898be in xf86SigHandler (signo=11) at xf86Events.c:1298 >>#8 0xbfbfff94 in ?? () >>#9 0x0000000b in ?? () >>#10 0x0000000c in ?? () >>#11 0xbfbfd040 in ?? () >>#12 0x00000000 in ?? () >>#13 0x08089830 in xf86InterceptSignals () at xf86Events.c:1270 >>#14 0x2834d8d8 in FreeTypeRasteriseGlyph (idx=0, flags=1, tgp=0x8f66700, >>instance=0x8f69400, hasMetrics=0) at ftfuncs.c:1034 >>#15 0x2834cb56 in FreeTypeInstanceGetGlyph (idx=0, flags=1, >>g=0xbfbfd62c, instance=0x8f69400) at ftfuncs.c:643 >>#16 0x28354018 in FreeTypeLoadXFont (fileName=0xbfbfdcc0 >>"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/fn=0:vl=y:simsun.ttc", >>vals=0xbfbfdc40, xf=0x8ea4a00, >>info=0x8ea4a04, bmfmt=0xbfbfd7b0, entry=0x8c50bb4) at ftfuncs.c:3362 >>#17 0x28354a25 in FreeTypeOpenScalable (fpe=0x8c83940, >>ppFont=0xbfbfe964, flags=0, entry=0x8c50bb4, >>fileName=0xbfbfdcc0 >>"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/fn=0:vl=y:simsun.ttc", >>vals=0xbfbfdc40, format=512, fmask=31, non_cachable_font=0x0) >>at ftfuncs.c:3743 >>#18 0x0811410b in FontFileOpenFont (client=0x8f65c00, fpe=0x8c83940, >>flags=0, >>name=0x8eacac0 >>"-misc-simsun-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-1o8859-1\b\200\uffff\227\b\200\uffff\233\b\uffff\uffff\233\b\uffff\uffff\233\b\uffff\236\uffff\b`8\uffff\b\uffff8\uffff\b@9\uffff\b`\213\uffff\b-75-75-p-0-iso8859-3", >>namelen=56, format=512, fmask=31, id=8388618, pFont=0xbfbfe964, >>aliasName=0xbfbfe950, non_cachable_font=0x0) at fontfile.c:433 >>#19 0x080f7f09 in doOpenFont (client=0x8f65c00, c=0x8eaca80) at >>dixfonts.c:294 >>#20 0x080f83cc in OpenFont (client=0x8f65c00, fid=8388618, flags=0, >>lenfname=56, >>pfontname=0x8e9f00c >>"-misc-simsun-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-gb18030.2000-1\230\001\003") >>at dixfonts.c:469 >>#21 0x080ced41 in ProcOpenFont (client=0x8f65c00) at dispatch.c:1312 >>#22 0x080cd158 in Dispatch () at dispatch.c:455 >>#23 0x080e35dc in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfbfeea8, envp=0xbfbfeeb8) at >>main.c:442 >>(gdb) >> >> > >Just curious, but why you say that the jdk is broken? As far as I can >see you have a core file from X and the stack trace shows no mention of >java native libraries. It appears that maybe freetype2-2.1.10 broke >Xorg, but not java. Am I missing something? > > yes, freetype2-2.1.10 broke Xorg,but only java demo let Xorg crash. >Cheers, > >Panagiotis >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 10:28:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136D016A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:28:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from ameno.mahoroba.org (gw4.mahoroba.org [218.45.22.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1D043D45; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:28:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from kasuga.mahoroba.org (IDENT:MB7iUG3J+qzi75JDQyUQqd4p78TqdaChsRNVHW56g/FQXI/5szlH83BFxbEwRUE5@kasuga.mahoroba.org [IPv6:3ffe:501:185b:8010:20b:97ff:fe2e:b521]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0) by ameno.mahoroba.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id j6RASEja013163 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:28:18 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:28:06 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: Huang wen hui In-Reply-To: <42E759FE.3020406@gddsn.org.cn> References: <42E743E7.5070000@gddsn.org.cn> <42E74CB3.1030101@ebs.gr> <42E759FE.3020406@gddsn.org.cn> User-Agent: xcite1.38> Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.50 (i386-unknown-freebsd6.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-BETA1 X-PGP-Key: http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/publickey.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F00 0B9E 2164 70FC 6DC5 BF5F 04E9 F086 BF90 71FE Organization: Internet Mutual Aid Society, YOKOHAMA MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (ameno.mahoroba.org [IPv6:3ffe:501:185b:8010::1]); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:28:18 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on ameno.mahoroba.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org, java@freebsd.org, Huang wen hui , Panagiotis Astithas Subject: Re: freetype2-2.1.10 broken JDK X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:28:35 -0000 Hi, >>>>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:55:10 +0800 >>>>> Huang wen hui said: >>I am using JDK1.5.0 + chinese locale(zh_CN.UTF-8) under CURRENT, I use >>truetype font in fontconfig.properties. >>freetype2-2.1.10 broke JDK1.5.0 now revert to freetype2-2.1.9 solve this >>problem. It also broken JDK1.4.2 >Just curious, but why you say that the jdk is broken? As far as I can >see you have a core file from X and the stack trace shows no mention of >java native libraries. It appears that maybe freetype2-2.1.10 broke >Xorg, but not java. Am I missing something? > > hwh> yes, freetype2-2.1.10 broke Xorg,but only java demo let Xorg crash. I met this problem, too. When I click a text in OpenOffice 1.1, Xorg server is crashed. Invoking Emacs 22.0.50 crashes Xorg server as well. So, I'm using freetype 2.1.9 for workaround. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 13:46:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640B316A420; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:46:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: from excite.com (nn3.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5BD43D53; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:46:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from piotrekk@excite.com) Received: by xprdmailfe22.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 7177D299BB; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:46:54 -0400 (EDT) To: lofi@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from [84.73.114.198] by xprdmailfe22.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:46:54 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 2383e4973664c80f7198bf469d15c13b From: "PK" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: piotrekk@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050727134654.7177D299BB@xprdmailfe22.nwk.excite.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:46:54 -0400 (EDT) Cc: clement@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: cannot install ntop from ports on freeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: piotrekk@excite.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:46:58 -0000 it seems, there are 2 BUGS in ntop: 1.) rrdtool 2.) XML plugin howto build ntop without the XML plugin, or howto change this patch to build without XML plugin ? xmldumpPlugin.c:36:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:37:2: warning: #warning =========================================================== xmldumpPlugin.c:38:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:39:2: warning: #warning The include of gdome.h that follows will generate a lot of xmldumpPlugin.c:40:2: warning: #warning compile warnings about 'shadows a global declaration'. xmldumpPlugin.c:41:2: warning: #warning Unfortunately, it's the way this crud is coded and can't xmldumpPlugin.c:42:2: warning: #warning be fixed. Just ignore them! xmldumpPlugin.c:43:2: warning: #warning In file included from /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib.h:69, from /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:27, from xmldumpPlugin.c:44: /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/gthreadpool.h:88: warning: declaration of 'wait' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/sys/wait.h:103: warning: shadowed declaration is here In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:44: /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:264: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/strings.h:50: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:331: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:483: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:585: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:649: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:694: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:739: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:783: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:801: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:857: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:893: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:935: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:977: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1013: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1033: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/strings.h:50: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1044: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows a global declaration /usr/include/strings.h:50: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1073: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here /usr/local/include/libgdome/gdome.h:1112: warning: declaration of 'version' shadows a global declaration ../globals-core.h:53: warning: shadowed declaration is here xmldumpPlugin.c:45:2: warning: #warning xmldumpPlugin.c:46:2: warning: #warning =========================================================== xmldumpPlugin.c:47:2: warning: #warning In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1165: xml_s_ntopinterface.inc: In function `newxml_ntopinterface': xml_s_ntopinterface.inc:494: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_s_ntopinterface.inc:529: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_s_ntopinterface.inc:565: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1429: xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc: In function `newxml_simpleprototrafficinfo': xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:46: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:46: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:52: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal2remote' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:52: error: structure has no member named `lastLocal2remote' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:58: error: structure has no member named `lastRem' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:58: error: structure has no member named `lastRem' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:64: error: structure has no member named `lastRem2local' xml_s_simpleprototrafficinfo.inc:64: error: structure has no member named `lastRem2local' In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1693: xml_g_invoke.inc: In function `dumpXML_invoke': xml_g_invoke.inc:71: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_g_invoke.inc:79: error: structure has no member named `accessLogFile' xml_g_invoke.inc:85: error: structure has no member named `enablePacketDecoding' xml_g_invoke.inc:91: error: structure has no member named `stickyHosts' xml_g_invoke.inc:97: error: structure has no member named `daemonMode' xml_g_invoke.inc:103: error: structure has no member named `maxNumLines' xml_g_invoke.inc:110: error: structure has no member named `rFileName' xml_g_invoke.inc:116: error: structure has no member named `trackOnlyLocalHosts' xml_g_invoke.inc:122: error: structure has no member named `devices' xml_g_invoke.inc:128: error: structure has no member named `enableOtherPacketDump' xml_g_invoke.inc:134: error: structure has no member named `filterExpressionInExtraFrame' xml_g_invoke.inc:140: error: structure has no member named `pcapLog' xml_g_invoke.inc:146: error: structure has no member named `localAddresses' xml_g_invoke.inc:152: error: structure has no member named `numericFlag' xml_g_invoke.inc:158: error: structure has no member named `dontTrustMACaddr' xml_g_invoke.inc:164: error: structure has no member named `protoSpecs' xml_g_invoke.inc:170: error: structure has no member named `enableSuspiciousPacketDump' xml_g_invoke.inc:176: error: structure has no member named `refreshRate' xml_g_invoke.inc:183: error: structure has no member named `disablePromiscuousMode' xml_g_invoke.inc:189: error: structure has no member named `traceLevel' xml_g_invoke.inc:196: error: structure has no member named `maxNumHashEntries' xml_g_invoke.inc:203: error: structure has no member named `maxNumSessions' xml_g_invoke.inc:217: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' xml_g_invoke.inc:227: error: structure has no member named `defaultVsan' xml_g_invoke.inc:234: error: structure has no member named `webAddr' xml_g_invoke.inc:240: error: structure has no member named `webPort' xml_g_invoke.inc:247: error: structure has no member named `enableSessionHandling' xml_g_invoke.inc:253: error: structure has no member named `currentFilterExpression' xml_g_invoke.inc:259: error: structure has no member named `domainName' xml_g_invoke.inc:265: error: structure has no member named `flowSpecs' xml_g_invoke.inc:273: error: structure has no member named `debugMode' xml_g_invoke.inc:279: error: structure has no member named `useSyslog' xml_g_invoke.inc:288: error: structure has no member named `mergeInterfaces' xml_g_invoke.inc:294: error: structure has no member named `pcapLogBasePath' xml_g_invoke.inc:300: error: structure has no member named `fcNSCacheFile' xml_g_invoke.inc:318: error: structure has no member named `printFcOnly' xml_g_invoke.inc:324: error: structure has no member named `mapperURL' xml_g_invoke.inc:332: error: structure has no member named `sslAddr' xml_g_invoke.inc:338: error: structure has no member named `sslPort' xml_g_invoke.inc:349: error: structure has no member named `useSSLwatchdog' xml_g_invoke.inc:359: error: structure has no member named `disableSchedYield' xml_g_invoke.inc:367: error: structure has no member named `P3Pcp' xml_g_invoke.inc:373: error: structure has no member named `P3Puri' xml_g_invoke.inc:379: error: structure has no member named `disableStopcap' xml_g_invoke.inc:385: error: structure has no member named `disableInstantSessionPurge' xml_g_invoke.inc:391: error: structure has no member named `noFc' xml_g_invoke.inc:397: error: structure has no member named `noInvalidLunDisplay' xml_g_invoke.inc:403: error: structure has no member named `disableMutexExtraInfo' xml_g_invoke.inc:409: error: structure has no member named `skipVersionCheck' In file included from xmldumpPlugin.c:1730: xml_g_intf.inc: In function `dumpXML_interfaces': xml_g_intf.inc:33: warning: nested extern declaration of `BufferTooShort' gmake[3]: *** [xmldumpPlugin.lo] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 kind regards piotr --- On Mon 07/25, Michael Nottebrock < lofi@freebsd.org > wrote: From: Michael Nottebrock [mailto: lofi@freebsd.org] To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, piotrekk@excite.com Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, clement@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:44:02 +0200 Subject: Re: cannot install ntop from ports on freeBSD 5.4 On Tuesday, 19. July 2005 01:01, PK wrote:
> I did rrdtool update, but get still errors:
>
> rrdPlugin.c: In function `graphCounter':
> rrdPlugin.c:583: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph'
> rrdPlugin.c: In function `netflowSummary':
> rrdPlugin.c:728: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph'
> rrdPlugin.c: In function `graphSummary':
> rrdPlugin.c:926: error: too few arguments to function `rrd_graph'
> gmake[3]: *** [rrdPlugin.lo] Error 1
> gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins'
> gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop/plugins'
> gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop'
> gmake: *** [all] Error 2
> *** Error code 2

That's actually a bug in ntop. ntop ships a fork of rrdtool in its sources,
but it does accidentally pick up an incompatible header from an rrdtool
installation if there is one. The attached patch should fix things (put it
in /usr/ports/net/ntop/files).

--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
Attachment: patch-ntop.h (0.21KB)
Attachment: Attachment (0.19KB)
_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 14:24:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AA816A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:24:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@amber.aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.in.markiza.sk [62.168.76.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3733443D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:24:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@amber.aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93656B853 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:28:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20992-08 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:28:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1212CB852 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:28:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from corwin@localhost) by amber.aeternal.net (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6RES1eP044668 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:28:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from corwin) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:28:01 +0200 From: martin hudec To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050727142801.GH97664@amber.aeternal.net> References: <20050726224853.AE1482E241@smtp01.isdsl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9sSKoi6Rw660DLir" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050726224853.AE1482E241@smtp01.isdsl.net> X-Copyright: (C) 2005 Martin Hudec X-Operating-System: FreeBSD amber.aeternal.net 5.4-STABLE i386 X-PGP-Key: http://www.aeternal.net/corwin_aeternal.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Subject: Re: Amavisd_new Port Install / BerkeleyDB X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: martin hudec List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:24:42 -0000 --9sSKoi6Rw660DLir Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:57:06AM +0200 or thereabouts, Gawie Marais (Home= ) wrote: > [root@filter log]# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/amavisd.sh start > Starting amavisd. > Problem in Amavis::DB or Amavis::DB::SNMP code: Can't locate loadable obj= ect > for module BerkeleyDB in @INC (@INC contains: > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6) at (eval 51) line 11 > Compilation failed in require at (eval 51) line 11. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 51) line 11. > Undefined subroutine &BerkeleyDB::Term::close_everything called at > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/mach/BerkeleyDB.pm line 1649. > END failed--call queue aborted. > [root@filter log]# >=20 >=20 > Can someone perhaps help me out here with some suggestions to fix the > problem or perhaps some explanation why I'm getting this error ? Do you have databases/p5-BerkeleyDB installed with respective setting of your BDB version (WITH_BDB_VER=3DXX, where is version of your Berkeley DB, like 43 for 4.3.)? cheers, Martin --=20 martin hudec * 421 907 303 393 * corwin@aeternal.net * http://www.aeternal.net "Nothing travels faster than the speed of light with the possible=20 exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws." Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" --9sSKoi6Rw660DLir Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC55nwZYEZIv+rgggRAlSdAKCT5ddnrCrTyyWiFAqCJnpQIIJ5zgCgmS+X ldiDQyf1shP7zl3aA0cxxFE= =miqI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9sSKoi6Rw660DLir-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 14:31:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89CB16A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:31:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (mail-in-02.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0FD43D48; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:31:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-05-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.17]) by mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC421F769; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:31:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (mail-in-02.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.42]) by mail-in-05-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA9211E309; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:31:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dsl-213-023-201-110.arcor-ip.net [213.23.201.110]) by mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521BE1F778; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:31:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6REVo8u042648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:31:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) From: Michael Nottebrock To: piotrekk@excite.com Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:31:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050727134654.7177D299BB@xprdmailfe22.nwk.excite.com> In-Reply-To: <20050727134654.7177D299BB@xprdmailfe22.nwk.excite.com> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: clement@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: cannot install ntop from ports on freeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:31:55 -0000 --nextPart2540802.W2frdIFtgM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, 27. July 2005 15:46, PK wrote: > it seems, there are 2 BUGS in ntop: > > 1.) rrdtool > 2.) XML plugin > > howto build ntop without the XML plugin, make config and uncheck "XMLDUMP Enable XML Dump support", then make cl= ean=20 and try again. I can reproduce this bug, but I don't know how to fix it - t= he=20 option should be removed or marked BROKEN for the time being. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart2540802.W2frdIFtgM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC55rVXhc68WspdLARAsyYAJ9tQE79x/jOjYLwYHgQSZdghGHzogCgqhm/ VqwFp+n32KIpDAB/ur53axU= =cmxI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2540802.W2frdIFtgM-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 16:04:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BB216A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:04:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from locnar@mail.utexas.edu) Received: from agamemnon.locnar.net (rrcs-67-79-3-214.sw.biz.rr.com [67.79.3.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D49D43D45; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:04:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from locnar@mail.utexas.edu) Received: from localhost (locnar@localhost.locnar.net [127.0.0.1]) by agamemnon.locnar.net (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j6RG3KnP055570; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:03:21 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:03:20 -0500 (CDT) From: "D. Hampton Finger" X-X-Sender: locnar@agamemnon.locnar.net To: ale@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050727104516.L55225@agamemnon.locnar.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on agamemnon.locnar.net Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: php4-extensions-1.0 (Bug?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:04:11 -0000 I have found what I feel to be a bug or a shortcoming in the way the php4-extensions-1.0 meta port works. If you install the port the first time, it works very well. However, if you go to add an additional one or many additional extensions with an additional use of the port, the /usr/local/etc/php/extensions file gets populated without checking for old/current entries. I.E. if you need to go back and add the mssql extension, the default listings from the port be added again. This creates duplicate listings of extensions in the file. The duplicate listings cause php to kick out errors, and those errors are not handled by apache well (Signal 11 core dump). Perhaps a better parsing of the extensions file upon additions/removals of extensions is in order as the information as to which extensions have been installed is listed in /var/db/pkg as well as in /var/db/ports. There has been some chatter on the net about his issue, but I didn't find where people had figured it out that it was the php extensions being called twice or more causing php to error and bringing down apache. most users who found this simply reloaded from the ground up which fixed it. This may be an issue with all the other php extensions, but I didn't test those. Thank you for your time, Hampton ------------------------------------------------------------ D. Hampton Finger locnar@mail.utexas.edu CWRL Systems Analyst PH: 512-636-1701 The University of Texas at Austin FAX: 512-471-6745 http://www.locnar.net ------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 16:15:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDE216A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:15:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9EB43D49; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:15:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6RGFWOk021772; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:15:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Hajimu UMEMOTO In-Reply-To: References: <42E743E7.5070000@gddsn.org.cn> <42E74CB3.1030101@ebs.gr> <42E759FE.3020406@gddsn.org.cn> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-l0r9er8ck1buwRJumWo0" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:14:59 -0400 Message-Id: <1122480899.95935.5.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: ports@freebsd.org, java@freebsd.org, Huang wen hui , Panagiotis Astithas , Huang wen hui Subject: Re: freetype2-2.1.10 broken JDK X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:15:23 -0000 --=-l0r9er8ck1buwRJumWo0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 19:28 +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, >=20 > >>>>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:55:10 +0800 > >>>>> Huang wen hui said: >=20 > >>I am using JDK1.5.0 + chinese locale(zh_CN.UTF-8) under CURRENT, I use > >>truetype font in fontconfig.properties. > >>freetype2-2.1.10 broke JDK1.5.0 now revert to freetype2-2.1.9 solve thi= s > >>problem. It also broken JDK1.4.2 >=20 > >Just curious, but why you say that the jdk is broken? As far as I can > >see you have a core file from X and the stack trace shows no mention of > >java native libraries. It appears that maybe freetype2-2.1.10 broke > >Xorg, but not java. Am I missing something? > > =20 > > > hwh> yes, freetype2-2.1.10 broke Xorg,but only java demo let Xorg crash. >=20 > I met this problem, too. When I click a text in OpenOffice 1.1, Xorg > server is crashed. Invoking Emacs 22.0.50 crashes Xorg server as > well. So, I'm using freetype 2.1.9 for workaround. See the x11@ archives. This is a known issue with FT 2.1.10. We're waiting for a response from wither xorg or the FT guys on how to properly fix it. Note: XF86 is also affected. People using multi-byte fonts seem to be more likely to hit this crash than others. Joe >=20 > Sincerely, >=20 > -- > Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan > ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org > http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-l0r9er8ck1buwRJumWo0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC57MDb2iPiv4Uz4cRAsuJAJ4mb3PgxDuHlX4bJJItwS7CASTWagCfW7i1 n2paAjGz/CeT4QIMhMG0R74= =IbO1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-l0r9er8ck1buwRJumWo0-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 19:37:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FBE16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:37:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maillist@mailbag.co.za) Received: from smtp02.isdsl.net (smtp02.isdsl.net [196.26.208.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C8C43D4C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:37:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maillist@mailbag.co.za) Received: from smtp02.isdsl.net (localhost.isdsl.net [127.0.0.1]) by smtp02.isdsl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B574D2E8D2; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:37:47 +0200 (SAST) Received: from daemon.rootchaos.za.net (c1-359-1.tpr.isadsl.co.za [196.34.237.105]) by smtp02.isdsl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811382E605; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:37:46 +0200 (SAST) Received: from gmarais.rootchaos.za.net. ([10.0.0.9] helo=gmarais) by daemon.rootchaos.za.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dxriy-0001pa-Vm; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:37:53 +0200 From: "GM" To: "'martin hudec'" , Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:41:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20050727142801.GH97664@amber.aeternal.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcWStzlsmR4prbKOT165blUNXtpkyQAK7k0g Message-Id: <20050727193746.811382E605@smtp02.isdsl.net> X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP at smtp02.isdsl.net Cc: Subject: RE: Amavisd_new Port Install / BerkeleyDB X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: maillist@mailbag.co.za List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:37:51 -0000 Martin Thank you for the reply. Indeed, I have BerkeleyDB installed, I also de-installed and re-installed with the switch mentioned to WITH_BDB_VER=43. Still no luck though. GM -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of martin hudec Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 4:28 PM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Amavisd_new Port Install / BerkeleyDB Hello, On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:57:06AM +0200 or thereabouts, Gawie Marais (Home) wrote: > [root@filter log]# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/amavisd.sh start Starting > amavisd. > Problem in Amavis::DB or Amavis::DB::SNMP code: Can't locate loadable > object for module BerkeleyDB in @INC (@INC contains: > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6) at (eval 51) line 11 Compilation failed in > require at (eval 51) line 11. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 51) line 11. > Undefined subroutine &BerkeleyDB::Term::close_everything called at > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/mach/BerkeleyDB.pm line 1649. > END failed--call queue aborted. > [root@filter log]# > > > Can someone perhaps help me out here with some suggestions to fix the > problem or perhaps some explanation why I'm getting this error ? Do you have databases/p5-BerkeleyDB installed with respective setting of your BDB version (WITH_BDB_VER=XX, where is version of your Berkeley DB, like 43 for 4.3.)? cheers, Martin -- martin hudec * 421 907 303 393 * corwin@aeternal.net * http://www.aeternal.net "Nothing travels faster than the speed of light with the possible exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws." Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 20:05:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E8E16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:05:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mats@dufberg.se) Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com (mxfep01.bredband.com [195.54.107.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E9043D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:05:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mats@dufberg.se) Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se ([83.227.136.82] [83.227.136.82]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20050727200516.MOGJ11632.mxfep01.bredband.com@mail.home.narnia.pp.se> for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:05:16 +0200 Received: from kafka.narnia.pp.se (kafka.narnia.pp.se [172.16.50.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA59FB854 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:05:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:05:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Mats Dufberg To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050727213614.P756@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: Error in mail/prayer (ports)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:05:20 -0000 The mail/prayer ports gives libc-client4 (in mail/cclient) as BUILD_DEPENDS, but since one of the prayer binary is dynamically build against the cclient it should also be a run dependent and registred as such, shouldn't it? # pkg_info -r prayer-1.0.12 Information for prayer-1.0.12: Depends on: Dependency: db42-4.2.52_4 # # ldd /usr/local/prayer/sbin/prayer-session /usr/local/prayer/sbin/prayer-session: libcrypt.so.2 => /lib/libcrypt.so.2 (0x280d5000) libz.so.2 => /lib/libz.so.2 (0x280ed000) libc-client4.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libc-client4.so.8 (0x280fd000) libssl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x281b4000) libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x281e2000) libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x282d9000) libpam.so.2 => /usr/lib/libpam.so.2 (0x283b3000) # # pkg_info -W /usr/local/lib/libc-client4.so.8 /usr/local/lib/libc-client4.so.8 was installed by package cclient-2004d,1 # Yours Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 20:31:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344F416A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:31:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maillist@mailbag.co.za) Received: from smtp02.isdsl.net (smtp02.isdsl.net [196.26.208.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D3C43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:31:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maillist@mailbag.co.za) Received: from smtp02.isdsl.net (localhost.isdsl.net [127.0.0.1]) by smtp02.isdsl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46E52E615; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:31:26 +0200 (SAST) Received: from daemon.rootchaos.za.net (c1-359-1.tpr.isadsl.co.za [196.34.237.105]) by smtp02.isdsl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F5C2E54E; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:31:25 +0200 (SAST) Received: from gmarais.rootchaos.za.net. ([10.0.0.9] helo=gmarais) by daemon.rootchaos.za.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1DxsYt-0001sO-OT; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:31:31 +0200 From: "GM" To: , "'martin hudec'" , Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:36:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20050727193746.811382E605@smtp02.isdsl.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcWStzlsmR4prbKOT165blUNXtpkyQAK7k0gAAHmvLA= Message-Id: <20050727203125.15F5C2E54E@smtp02.isdsl.net> X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP at smtp02.isdsl.net Cc: Subject: RE: Amavisd_new Port Install / BerkeleyDB X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: maillist@mailbag.co.za List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:31:34 -0000 Hi, Turns out to be a permissions problem on the directory structure /usr/local/lib/perl5/. I also found this on freeBSD 5.3 RELEASE as well. Fixed up permissions, problem fixed. Regards Gawie Marais -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of GM Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 9:41 PM To: 'martin hudec'; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Amavisd_new Port Install / BerkeleyDB Martin Thank you for the reply. Indeed, I have BerkeleyDB installed, I also de-installed and re-installed with the switch mentioned to WITH_BDB_VER=43. Still no luck though. GM -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of martin hudec Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 4:28 PM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Amavisd_new Port Install / BerkeleyDB Hello, On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:57:06AM +0200 or thereabouts, Gawie Marais (Home) wrote: > [root@filter log]# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/amavisd.sh start Starting > amavisd. > Problem in Amavis::DB or Amavis::DB::SNMP code: Can't locate loadable > object for module BerkeleyDB in @INC (@INC contains: > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6) at (eval 51) line 11 Compilation failed in > require at (eval 51) line 11. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 51) line 11. > Undefined subroutine &BerkeleyDB::Term::close_everything called at > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/mach/BerkeleyDB.pm line 1649. > END failed--call queue aborted. > [root@filter log]# > > > Can someone perhaps help me out here with some suggestions to fix the > problem or perhaps some explanation why I'm getting this error ? Do you have databases/p5-BerkeleyDB installed with respective setting of your BDB version (WITH_BDB_VER=XX, where is version of your Berkeley DB, like 43 for 4.3.)? cheers, Martin -- martin hudec * 421 907 303 393 * corwin@aeternal.net * http://www.aeternal.net "Nothing travels faster than the speed of light with the possible exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws." Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:08:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE8516A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:08:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from virenp@mail.utexas.edu) Received: from smtp.cm.utexas.edu (smtp.cm.utexas.edu [146.6.135.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED9443D48; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:08:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from virenp@mail.utexas.edu) Received: from mail.cm.utexas.edu (smtp.cm.utexas.edu [146.6.135.3]) by smtp.cm.utexas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A615D6D48F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:08:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 146.6.178.5 (SquirrelMail authenticated user vpatel) by mail.cm.utexas.edu with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:08:14 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:08:14 -0500 (CDT) From: "Viren Patel" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: apache13-modssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 port broken?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: virenp@mail.utexas.edu List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:08:15 -0000 I am trying to install apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 and get the following: #make ===> apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 has known vulnerabilities: => apache -- http request smuggling. Reference: => Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl. I have updated the ports tree and the files directory contains the patch for this vulnerability (patch-secfix-CAN-2005-2088). I need to install this port urgently. What am I doing wrong?? If the vulnerability has not been fixed, how can I force install? TIA. -- Viren From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:14:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9F316A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:14:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6304143D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:14:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC96388C71; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:14:48 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:14:48 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: virenp@mail.utexas.edu, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <782A8803E0E45AF2882CE483@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> References: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: apache13-modssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 port broken?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:14:49 -0000 --On Wednesday, July 27, 2005 16:08:14 -0500 Viren Patel wrote: > I am trying to install apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 and > get the following: > ># make > ===> apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 has known > vulnerabilities: > => apache -- http request smuggling. > Reference: > 38a.html> => Please update your ports tree and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl. > > I have updated the ports tree and the files directory > contains the patch for this vulnerability > (patch-secfix-CAN-2005-2088). > > I need to install this port urgently. What am I doing > wrong?? If the vulnerability has not been fixed, how can I > force install? TIA. > make FORCE_PKGREGISTER=yes && make install Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:31:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164F516A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:31:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from virenp@mail.utexas.edu) Received: from smtp.cm.utexas.edu (smtp.cm.utexas.edu [146.6.135.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37A643D49 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:31:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from virenp@mail.utexas.edu) Received: from mail.cm.utexas.edu (smtp.cm.utexas.edu [146.6.135.3]) by smtp.cm.utexas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312B56D42D; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:31:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 146.6.178.5 (SquirrelMail authenticated user vpatel) by mail.cm.utexas.edu with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:31:09 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <42812.146.6.178.5.1122499869.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> In-Reply-To: <782A8803E0E45AF2882CE483@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <782A8803E0E45AF2882CE483@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:31:09 -0500 (CDT) From: "Viren Patel" To: "Paul Schmehl" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache13-modssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 port broken?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: virenp@mail.utexas.edu List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:31:11 -0000 > --On Wednesday, July 27, 2005 16:08:14 -0500 Viren Patel > wrote: > >> I am trying to install apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 >> and >> get the following: >> >># make >> ===> apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 has known >> vulnerabilities: >> => apache -- http request smuggling. >> Reference: >> > 38a.html> => Please update your ports tree and try >> again. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl. >> >> I have updated the ports tree and the files directory >> contains the patch for this vulnerability >> (patch-secfix-CAN-2005-2088). >> >> I need to install this port urgently. What am I doing >> wrong?? If the vulnerability has not been fixed, how can >> I >> force install? TIA. >> > make FORCE_PKGREGISTER=yes && make install > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > University of Texas at Dallas > AVIEN Founding Member > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Thanks for the quick reply but it doesn't work. I thought it was FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. Anyway, I tried it both ways but no luck. Any other ideas? -- Viren From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:38:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9391916A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:38:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from virenp@mail.utexas.edu) Received: from smtp.cm.utexas.edu (smtp.cm.utexas.edu [146.6.135.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487E343D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:38:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from virenp@mail.utexas.edu) Received: from mail.cm.utexas.edu (smtp.cm.utexas.edu [146.6.135.3]) by smtp.cm.utexas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD6D6D48F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:38:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 146.6.178.5 (SquirrelMail authenticated user vpatel) by mail.cm.utexas.edu with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:38:52 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <55749.146.6.178.5.1122500332.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> In-Reply-To: <42812.146.6.178.5.1122499869.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> References: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <782A8803E0E45AF2882CE483@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <42812.146.6.178.5.1122499869.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:38:52 -0500 (CDT) From: "Viren Patel" To: "Paul Schmehl" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache13-modssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 port broken?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: virenp@mail.utexas.edu List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:38:53 -0000 >> --On Wednesday, July 27, 2005 16:08:14 -0500 Viren Patel >> wrote: >> >>> I am trying to install apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 >>> and >>> get the following: >>> >>># make >>> ===> apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 has known >>> vulnerabilities: >>> => apache -- http request smuggling. >>> Reference: >>> >> 38a.html> => Please update your ports tree and try >>> again. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl. >>> >>> I have updated the ports tree and the files directory >>> contains the patch for this vulnerability >>> (patch-secfix-CAN-2005-2088). >>> >>> I need to install this port urgently. What am I doing >>> wrong?? If the vulnerability has not been fixed, how >>> can >>> I >>> force install? TIA. >>> >> make FORCE_PKGREGISTER=yes && make install >> >> Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) >> Adjunct Information Security Officer >> University of Texas at Dallas >> AVIEN Founding Member >> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > > Thanks for the quick reply but it doesn't work. I thought > it was FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. Anyway, I tried it both ways > but no luck. Any other ideas? > > -- > Viren > Temporary solution: Uninstall portaudit. -- Viren From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 21:40:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BA416A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:40:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64A043D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:40:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9807C388FC3; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:40:24 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:40:24 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: virenp@mail.utexas.edu Message-ID: <9007CDAE704060C4829121AB@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <42812.146.6.178.5.1122499869.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> References: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <782A8803E0E45AF2882CE483@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <42812.146.6.178.5.1122499869.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache13-modssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 port broken?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:40:25 -0000 --On Wednesday, July 27, 2005 16:31:09 -0500 Viren Patel wrote: >>> >>> I need to install this port urgently. What am I doing >>> wrong?? If the vulnerability has not been fixed, how can >>> I >>> force install? TIA. >>> >> make FORCE_PKGREGISTER=yes && make install >> >> Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) >> Adjunct Information Security Officer >> University of Texas at Dallas >> AVIEN Founding Member >> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > Thanks for the quick reply but it doesn't work. I thought > it was FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. Anyway, I tried it both ways > but no luck. Any other ideas? > It is. I screwed up when I typed the answer. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 22:01:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFDB16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:01:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F0943D72 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:00:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 968131F87C3B; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:00:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:00:57 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Viren Patel Message-ID: <20050727220057.GB43426@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Viren Patel , Paul Schmehl , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <782A8803E0E45AF2882CE483@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <42812.146.6.178.5.1122499869.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42812.146.6.178.5.1122499869.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache13-modssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 port broken?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:01:03 -0000 # virenp@mail.utexas.edu / 2005-07-27 16:31:09 -0500: > > --On Wednesday, July 27, 2005 16:08:14 -0500 Viren Patel > > wrote: > > > >> I am trying to install apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 > >> and > >> get the following: > >> > >># make > >> ===> apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 has known > >> vulnerabilities: > >> => apache -- http request smuggling. > >> Reference: > >> >> 38a.html> => Please update your ports tree and try > >> again. > >> *** Error code 1 > >> > >> Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl. > >> > >> I have updated the ports tree and the files directory > >> contains the patch for this vulnerability > >> (patch-secfix-CAN-2005-2088). > >> > >> I need to install this port urgently. What am I doing > >> wrong?? If the vulnerability has not been fixed, how can > >> I > >> force install? TIA. > >> > > make FORCE_PKGREGISTER=yes && make install > > Thanks for the quick reply but it doesn't work. I thought > it was FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. Anyway, I tried it both ways > but no luck. Any other ideas? make FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=yes build install * FORCE_PKG_REGISTER takes effect during the install phase * why/where do people get the funky idea that running two dependent targets in two different make processes with two different sets of variables will buy them anything besides problems? -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 22:31:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E4F16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:31:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D6E43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:31:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D89388CFB for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:31:40 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:31:40 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Question about maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:31:41 -0000 If a port lists the maintainer (in the Makefile) as "fred", does that mean fred@freebsd.org? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 22:53:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12D216A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:53:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from jupiter.efacilitas.de (85-10-196-108.clients.your-server.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4260143D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:53:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by jupiter.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BC4C3DC5A; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CA412B140; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:53:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79174-08; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:53:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF8E12B09A; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:53:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:53:04 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:53:35 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > If a port lists the maintainer (in the Makefile) as "fred", does that > mean fred@freebsd.org? I can't find a port with incomplete information about its maintainer. Use 'make maintainer' to determine the e-mail address of the responsible maintainer. Look for the variable MAINTAINER in Makefile. Björn From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 23:01:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB3F16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:01:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDFC43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:01:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DCF388CC2 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:01:31 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:01:31 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: Question about maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:01:36 -0000 --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 00:53:04 +0200 Bj=F6rn K=F6nig=20 wrote: > Paul Schmehl wrote: > >> If a port lists the maintainer (in the Makefile) as "fred", does that >> mean fred@freebsd.org? > > I can't find a port with incomplete information about its maintainer. Use > 'make maintainer' to determine the e-mail address of the responsible > maintainer. Look for the variable MAINTAINER in Makefile. > x11-toolkits/iwidgets make maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org head Makefile # New ports collection makefile for: itk # Date created: Aug 17 1996 # Whom: chuckr So, does this mean that chuckr no longer maintains the port? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 23:05:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A389516A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:05:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFEF43D55 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:05:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j6RN57EF011097; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:05:07 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j6RN57kr011096; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:05:07 -0700 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:05:07 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20050727230507.GC7618@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="m51xatjYGsM+13rf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:05:09 -0000 --m51xatjYGsM+13rf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 06:01:31PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 00:53:04 +0200 Bj=F6rn K=F6nig=20 > wrote: >=20 > >Paul Schmehl wrote: > > > >>If a port lists the maintainer (in the Makefile) as "fred", does that > >>mean fred@freebsd.org? > > > >I can't find a port with incomplete information about its maintainer. Use > >'make maintainer' to determine the e-mail address of the responsible > >maintainer. Look for the variable MAINTAINER in Makefile. > > > x11-toolkits/iwidgets >=20 > make maintainer > ports@FreeBSD.org >=20 > head Makefile > # New ports collection makefile for: itk > # Date created: Aug 17 1996 > # Whom: chuckr >=20 > So, does this mean that chuckr no longer maintains the port? Yes. The header is mostly useless trash listing information CVS holds just fine. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --m51xatjYGsM+13rf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC6BMjXY6L6fI4GtQRAoZeAJ4gOF23RtvUyfkZH6tkGrLJYJx/3ACg1Kur 5Isl0Uf/Jo4ihPq1WvhfubI= =m/2l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --m51xatjYGsM+13rf-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 23:05:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D4816A420 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:05:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3459443D4C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:05:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B874A1F87C4B; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:05:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:05:23 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Schmehl , ports@freebsd.org References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:05:25 -0000 # pauls@utdallas.edu / 2005-07-27 18:01:31 -0500: > --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 00:53:04 +0200 Björn König > wrote: > > >Paul Schmehl wrote: > > > >>If a port lists the maintainer (in the Makefile) as "fred", does that > >>mean fred@freebsd.org? > > > >I can't find a port with incomplete information about its maintainer. Use > >'make maintainer' to determine the e-mail address of the responsible > >maintainer. Look for the variable MAINTAINER in Makefile. > > > x11-toolkits/iwidgets > > make maintainer > ports@FreeBSD.org > > head Makefile > # New ports collection makefile for: itk > # Date created: Aug 17 1996 > # Whom: chuckr > > So, does this mean that chuckr no longer maintains the port? That block at the top has information about the original creator of the port. If I create a new port for software I want to use on FreeBSD (but don't want to maintain the port), I'll use # New ports collection makefile for: $whatever # Date created: $right_now # Whom: Roman Neuhauser ... MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 23:08:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8A716A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:08:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from jupiter.efacilitas.de (85-10-196-108.clients.your-server.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B935343D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:08:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by jupiter.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEC2C3ECD5; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD52212B1C2; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:08:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81765-09; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:07:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A6912B09A; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:07:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E813C9.3030206@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:07:53 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:08:27 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > So, does this mean that chuckr no longer maintains the port? This port had no maintainer for the last four years. Björn From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 23:24:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B4916A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:24:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1355343D53 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:24:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 32588 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 23:24:38 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2005 23:24:38 -0000 Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6RNOPLv027042 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:24:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (195-11.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.195.11]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6RNOJtv088986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:24:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (mteterin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6RNOD3S003807 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:24:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6RNODDa003806 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:24:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mteterin.us.murex.com: mteterin set sender to mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com using -f From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:24:12 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507271924.12867.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV devel-20050525/994/Wed Jul 27 04:28:09 2005 on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: Subject: list of Contributors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:24:39 -0000 Hello! I need to add a person to the list, but can't recall, where to find the file. Can someone, please, point me at it? Thanks! -mi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 23:44:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90F516A437 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:44:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from jupiter.efacilitas.de (85-10-196-108.clients.your-server.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432FF43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:44:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by jupiter.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC70C3DE77; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DB512B1C0; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:44:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83801-09; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:44:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1A912B09A; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:44:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42E81C47.9040109@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:44:07 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikhail Teterin References: <200507271924.12867.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <200507271924.12867.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: list of Contributors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:44:42 -0000 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > I need to add a person to the list, but can't recall, where to find the file. > Can someone, please, point me at it? Thanks! Do you mean doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib.additional.sgml ? Björn From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 23:46:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E2516A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:46:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E35243D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:46:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 21859 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 23:46:52 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2005 23:46:52 -0000 Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6RNknVU027086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:46:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (195-11.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.195.11]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6RNkhHi089086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:46:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (mteterin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6RNkcvn003893; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:46:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6RNkb1a003892; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:46:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mteterin.us.murex.com: mteterin set sender to mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com using -f From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:46:37 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507271924.12867.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <42E81C47.9040109@cs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <42E81C47.9040109@cs.tu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507271946.37424.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV devel-20050525/994/Wed Jul 27 04:28:09 2005 on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: list of Contributors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:46:53 -0000 > > I need to add a person to the list, but can't recall, where to find the > > file. Can someone, please, point me at it? Thanks! > > Do you mean > doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib.additional.sgml > ? Probably, but it is under doc/ -- I don't think, I can modify it, can I? -mi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 23:52:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F7A16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:52:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF9843D48 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:52:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j6RNqELt016391; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:52:14 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j6RNqEP6016390; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:52:14 -0700 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:52:14 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Mikhail Teterin Message-ID: <20050727235214.GA16239@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <200507271924.12867.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <42E81C47.9040109@cs.tu-berlin.de> <200507271946.37424.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507271946.37424.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: list of Contributors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:52:26 -0000 --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 07:46:37PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > I need to add a person to the list, but can't recall, where to find t= he > > > file. Can someone, please, point me at it? Thanks! > > > > Do you mean > > doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib.additional.sgml > > ? >=20 > Probably, but it is under doc/ -- I don't think, I can modify it, can I? Yes, there will be a note in the commit message if you aren't actually a docs committer, but that's it. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC6B4tXY6L6fI4GtQRAqVMAKCDGrLTB7KcmFa2iMQSiQtplgMKZwCeOr2+ oHeuvyGfL385hGnPW1DR3Bk= =SNGV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 07:05:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13EE16A420; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:05:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.88.12.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C9D43D48; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:05:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.droso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00BC2289B; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:05:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C6AF022899; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:05:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:05:11 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050728070511.GP26867@droso.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org References: <200507271924.12867.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <42E81C47.9040109@cs.tu-berlin.de> <200507271946.37424.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050727235214.GA16239@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R9qb+eAX/AZDW6n0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050727235214.GA16239@odin.ac.hmc.edu> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 5.4-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd 0.1 Cc: Subject: Re: list of Contributors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:05:22 -0000 --R9qb+eAX/AZDW6n0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:52:14PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 07:46:37PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > > I need to add a person to the list, but can't recall, where to find= the > > > > file. Can someone, please, point me at it? Thanks! > > > > > > Do you mean > > > doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib.additional.sgml > > > ? > >=20 > > Probably, but it is under doc/ -- I don't think, I can modify it, can I? >=20 > Yes, there will be a note in the commit message if you aren't actually a > docs committer, but that's it. >=20 This list is an exception so ports committers are allowed to commit to this without doc review. However, if you're uncomfortable with the SGML, you can always ask a doc committer to take a look at it. Cheers, -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing DISCLAIMER: No electrons were harmed while sending this message. --R9qb+eAX/AZDW6n0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6IOnqy9aWxUlaZARAgKVAKDLEE5dcluRZH/ZGDlWD5xYjYxn1gCggMRk HrbdGJiNEtrPt1yO7neQHTo= =pa9x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --R9qb+eAX/AZDW6n0-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 07:05:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13EE16A420; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:05:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.88.12.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C9D43D48; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:05:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.droso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00BC2289B; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:05:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C6AF022899; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:05:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:05:11 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050728070511.GP26867@droso.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org References: <200507271924.12867.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <42E81C47.9040109@cs.tu-berlin.de> <200507271946.37424.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050727235214.GA16239@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R9qb+eAX/AZDW6n0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050727235214.GA16239@odin.ac.hmc.edu> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 5.4-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd 0.1 Cc: Subject: Re: list of Contributors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:05:22 -0000 --R9qb+eAX/AZDW6n0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:52:14PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 07:46:37PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > > I need to add a person to the list, but can't recall, where to find= the > > > > file. Can someone, please, point me at it? Thanks! > > > > > > Do you mean > > > doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib.additional.sgml > > > ? > >=20 > > Probably, but it is under doc/ -- I don't think, I can modify it, can I? >=20 > Yes, there will be a note in the commit message if you aren't actually a > docs committer, but that's it. >=20 This list is an exception so ports committers are allowed to commit to this without doc review. However, if you're uncomfortable with the SGML, you can always ask a doc committer to take a look at it. Cheers, -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing DISCLAIMER: No electrons were harmed while sending this message. --R9qb+eAX/AZDW6n0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6IOnqy9aWxUlaZARAgKVAKDLEE5dcluRZH/ZGDlWD5xYjYxn1gCggMRk HrbdGJiNEtrPt1yO7neQHTo= =pa9x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --R9qb+eAX/AZDW6n0-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 08:38:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E30C16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:38:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterj@qubesoft.com) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D760C43D4C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:38:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterj@qubesoft.com) Received: from pete10 ([82.38.179.218]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:39:30 +0100 Message-ID: <037501c5934f$c41b4c70$fe32a8c0@pete10> From: "Peter Jeffery" To: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:38:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2005 08:39:30.0983 (UTC) FILETIME=[DF690B70:01C5934F] Cc: Subject: portaudit incorrectly blocks use of apache-2.0.54_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:38:47 -0000 The report says: Affected package: apache-2.0.54_2 (matched by apache<2.1.6_1) Type of problem: apache -- http request smuggling. Reference: but reading the report it claims that apache > 2.0.54_1 is okay. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:33:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6953516A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:33:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from koma2@lovepeers.org) Received: from www235.sakura.ne.jp (www235.sakura.ne.jp [202.181.97.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD8B43D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:33:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from koma2@lovepeers.org) Received: from [192.168.8.110] (nurikabe.timedia.co.jp [218.225.123.151]) (authenticated bits=0) by www235.sakura.ne.jp (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6S9XXbX069573 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:33:38 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from koma2@lovepeers.org) Message-ID: <42E8A66D.9070601@lovepeers.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:33:33 +0900 From: KOMATSU Shinichiro User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: ja, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org References: <037501c5934f$c41b4c70$fe32a8c0@pete10> In-Reply-To: <037501c5934f$c41b4c70$fe32a8c0@pete10> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter Jeffery Subject: Re: portaudit incorrectly blocks use of apache-2.0.54_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:33:46 -0000 Peter Jeffery wrote: > The report says: > > Affected package: apache-2.0.54_2 (matched by apache<2.1.6_1) > Type of problem: apache -- http request smuggling. > Reference: > > > > > but reading the report it claims that apache > 2.0.54_1 is okay. I just sent this to GNATS http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=84214 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 09:34:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677E716A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:34:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.88.12.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19A343D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:34:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.droso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC3D22899; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:34:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id ABA0222898; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:34:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:34:08 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: Peter Jeffery Message-ID: <20050728093408.GI26867@droso.net> Mail-Followup-To: Peter Jeffery , ports@freebsd.org References: <037501c5934f$c41b4c70$fe32a8c0@pete10> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="70fLfmUGd5x0AJTB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <037501c5934f$c41b4c70$fe32a8c0@pete10> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 5.4-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd 0.1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portaudit incorrectly blocks use of apache-2.0.54_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:34:11 -0000 --70fLfmUGd5x0AJTB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 09:38:45AM +0100, Peter Jeffery wrote: > The report says: >=20 > Affected package: apache-2.0.54_2 (matched by apache<2.1.6_1) > Type of problem: apache -- http request smuggling. > Reference:=20 > >=20 >=20 > but reading the report it claims that apache > 2.0.54_1 is okay.=20 >=20 clement just committed a fix for this. Can you try this after cvsup? Cheers, -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing DISCLAIMER: No electrons were harmed while sending this message. --70fLfmUGd5x0AJTB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6KaQqy9aWxUlaZARAojgAKDtPOHbWDCIYVnqyQBJRk5ihX5mkACg50Zg SwYteZtkLXyuPEWEfD+BNKg= =CCLz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --70fLfmUGd5x0AJTB-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 10:00:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E65916A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:00:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fenner@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EC343D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:00:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fenner@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (fenner@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SA0U1H087633 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:00:30 GMT (envelope-from fenner@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6SA0U1A087614 for ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:00:30 GMT (envelope-from fenner) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:00:30 GMT From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <200507281000.j6SA0U1A087614@freefall.freebsd.org> To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:00:31 -0000 Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ . A list by MAINTAINER is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/ so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In addition, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with build problems is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/ports@freebsd.org.html Since no one is responsible for these ports, the problem won't get fixed unless someone on this list takes the initiative. Thanks for your help! Bill "annoying port email" Fenner From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 10:00:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C684916A42D for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:00:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ishizuka@ish.org) Received: from onion.ish.org (onion.ish.org [219.118.161.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3411343D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:00:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ishizuka@ish.org) Received: from localhost (ishizuka@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by onion.ish.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/2005-03-31) with ESMTP id j6SA0Xo7094204 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:00:33 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ishizuka@ish.org) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:00:33 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20050728.190033.74666321.ishizuka@ish.org> To: ports@freebsd.org From: Masachika ISHIZUKA In-Reply-To: <20050728093408.GI26867@droso.net> References: <037501c5934f$c41b4c70$fe32a8c0@pete10> <20050728093408.GI26867@droso.net> X-PGP-Fingerprint20: 276D 697A C2CB 1580 C683 8F18 DA98 1A4A 50D2 C4CB X-PGP-Fingerprint16: C6 DE 46 24 D7 9F 22 EB 79 E2 90 AB 1B 9A 35 2E X-PGP-Public-Key: http://www.ish.org/pgp-public-key.txt X-URL: http://www.ish.org/ X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: portaudit incorrectly blocks use of apache-2.0.54_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:00:36 -0000 >> Affected package: apache-2.0.54_2 (matched by apache<2.1.6_1) >> [snip] >> >> but reading the report it claims that apache > 2.0.54_1 is okay. >> > clement just committed a fix for this. Can you try this after cvsup? Hi, this is ishizuka. Thank you for a fix. Now, portaudit -aF is OK for apache-2.0.54_2. -- ishizuka@ish.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 10:45:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97AE316A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:45:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterj@qubesoft.com) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2E843D4C; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:45:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterj@qubesoft.com) Received: from pete10 ([82.38.179.218]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:45:47 +0100 Message-ID: <04f701c59361$67a95ab0$fe32a8c0@pete10> From: "Peter Jeffery" To: "Erwin Lansing" References: <037501c5934f$c41b4c70$fe32a8c0@pete10> <20050728093408.GI26867@droso.net> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:45:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2005 10:45:47.0077 (UTC) FILETIME=[831D3F50:01C59361] Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: portaudit incorrectly blocks use of apache-2.0.54_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:45:03 -0000 Yup. Works fine now. Sorry about top posting. Email client disability. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erwin Lansing" To: "Peter Jeffery" Cc: Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 10:34 AM Subject: Re: portaudit incorrectly blocks use of apache-2.0.54_2 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 09:38:45AM +0100, Peter Jeffery wrote: > The report says: > > Affected package: apache-2.0.54_2 (matched by apache<2.1.6_1) > Type of problem: apache -- http request smuggling. > Reference: > > > > but reading the report it claims that apache > 2.0.54_1 is okay. > clement just committed a fix for this. Can you try this after cvsup? Cheers, -erwin -- Erwin Lansing DISCLAIMER: No electrons were harmed while sending this message. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 12:35:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD2C16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:35:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan-Peter.Koopmann=ports=freebsd.org=410d5bf1611b7dba96b1672fd5a16f1900108165@seceidos.de) Received: from mail.seceidos.de (mail.seceidos.de [213.157.28.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CC443D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:35:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan-Peter.Koopmann=ports=freebsd.org=410d5bf1611b7dba96b1672fd5a16f1900108165@seceidos.de) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:34:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Exim 4.52 with SPF fails Thread-Index: AcWTcMboopOxSdzTSXa/Mx4xWX+EEw== From: "Jan-Peter Koopmann" To: , X-MsgInfo-Seceidos: This message was scanned for viruses. If you have any questions please contact postmaster@seceidos.de Cc: Subject: Exim 4.52 with SPF fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:35:19 -0000 Hi, is this a known problem: proxy:/usr/ports/mail/exim # make WITH_SPF=3Dyes =3D=3D=3D> Building for exim-4.52 `Makefile' is up to date. =20 =20 cc spf.c spf.c: In function `spf_open': spf.c:36: `SPF_server_t' undeclared (first use in this function) spf.c:36: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once spf.c:36: for each function it appears in.) spf.c:36: `spf_server' undeclared (first use in this function) spf.c:37: `SPF_DNS_CACHE' undeclared (first use in this function) spf.c: In function `spf_close': spf.c:46: `SPF_server_t' undeclared (first use in this function) spf.c:46: `spf_server' undeclared (first use in this function) spf.c: In function `spf_find': spf.c:52: `SPF_server_t' undeclared (first use in this function) spf.c:52: `spf_server' undeclared (first use in this function) spf.c:53: `SPF_request_t' undeclared (first use in this function) spf.c:53: `spf_request' undeclared (first use in this function) spf.c:54: `SPF_response_t' undeclared (first use in this function) spf.c:54: `spf_response' undeclared (first use in this function) *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim/work/exim-4.52/build-FreeBSD-i386/lookups. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim/work/exim-4.52/build-FreeBSD-i386. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim/work/exim-4.52. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim. This always used to work like a charm.=20 Kind regards, JP From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:37:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E092F16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:37:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A6343D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:37:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E2D38903C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:37:34 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:37:34 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <42E813C9.3030206@cs.tu-berlin.de> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <42E813C9.3030206@cs.tu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: Question about maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:37:35 -0000 --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 01:07:53 +0200 Bj=F6rn K=F6nig=20 wrote: > Paul Schmehl wrote: > >> So, does this mean that chuckr no longer maintains the port? > > This port had no maintainer for the last four years. > Great! I need it for a port I'm working on, and the script won't run=20 because it can't find iwidgets. I guess that means I have one more port to = do... Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:43:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D6416A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:43:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EA443D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:43:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8796E38903C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:43:41 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:43:41 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <8C64A123AF5094DE468F863D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <42E813C9.3030206@cs.tu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: Question about maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:43:42 -0000 --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 09:37:34 -0500 Paul Schmehl=20 wrote: > --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 01:07:53 +0200 Bj=F6rn K=F6nig > wrote: > >> Paul Schmehl wrote: >> >>> So, does this mean that chuckr no longer maintains the port? >> >> This port had no maintainer for the last four years. >> > Great! I need it for a port I'm working on, and the script won't run > because it can't find iwidgets. I guess that means I have one more port > to do... > OK. I see that tcl (83,84), itcl, itk and iwidgets are all without=20 maintainers. Does that mean the ports are maintained by freebsd folks? Or = not maintained at all? I need all these ports for the port I'm working on. They all install fine, = but the script in my port won't run because it can't find iwidgets. I=20 still haven't figured out why, but I suspect it's either a pathing, env or=20 lib issue. I've tried a number o symlinks in various places, none of which = have worked. Is there someone maintaining these that might be able to help me sort this=20 out? > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > University of Texas at Dallas > AVIEN Founding Member > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 14:45:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF07E16A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:45:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEB543D45; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:45:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SEjXI5033257; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:45:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id j6SEjX3m033254; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:45:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:45:33 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Viren Patel In-Reply-To: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> Message-ID: <20050728084428.J56124@wonkity.com> References: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:45:33 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache13-modssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 port broken?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:45:35 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Viren Patel wrote: > I am trying to install apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 and > get the following: > > #make > ===> apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 has known > vulnerabilities: > => apache -- http request smuggling. > Reference: > > => Please update your ports tree and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl. > > I have updated the ports tree and the files directory > contains the patch for this vulnerability > (patch-secfix-CAN-2005-2088). > > I need to install this port urgently. What am I doing > wrong?? If the vulnerability has not been fixed, how can I > force install? TIA. # make -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES will override portaudit. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 15:09:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F0316A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (mail-in-06.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0258F43D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:09:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-06-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-06-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.18]) by mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C2630856; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (mail-in-07.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.47]) by mail-in-06-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24194124594; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dsl-082-083-044-241.arcor-ip.net [82.83.44.241]) by mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E742B6F8; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:09:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SF9O0M065543 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:09:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:09:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <8C64A123AF5094DE468F863D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <8C64A123AF5094DE468F863D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: Question about maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:09:30 -0000 --nextPart1660206.EVM8zoQqqz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 28. July 2005 16:43, Paul Schmehl wrote: > OK. I see that tcl (83,84), itcl, itk and iwidgets are all without > maintainers. Does that mean the ports are maintained by freebsd folks? = Or > not maintained at all? Not maintained at all. This is the charme of tcl/tk at work here, the black= =20 magic that it is makes nobody want to make a commitment to the stuff. :-) In the past, every once in a while somebody has submitted/committed an upda= te=20 here or there, but nobody ever picked up maintainership. You can check out= =20 who submitted/committed what in FreeBSD's cvsweb. However, tcl83/84, itk, itcl and iwidgets are a pretty broad base. You migh= t=20 want to get a clearer idea first where the problem is located before you go= =20 sending out questions to people. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart1660206.EVM8zoQqqz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC6PUjXhc68WspdLARAjTtAKCTH/18Wjoad/yPu8NWxr35w6k0SgCgqFh+ 7LkyGq4geceq1nkz9sdTFjA= =TPpf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1660206.EVM8zoQqqz-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 15:18:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FF616A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:18:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AED643D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:18:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C193891E9 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:18:14 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:18:14 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <74EE282D5C76B38FE326C774@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <200507281709.23125.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <8C64A123AF5094DE468F863D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <200507281709.23125.lofi@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Question about maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:18:15 -0000 --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 17:09:19 +0200 Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Thursday, 28. July 2005 16:43, Paul Schmehl wrote: > >> OK. I see that tcl (83,84), itcl, itk and iwidgets are all without >> maintainers. Does that mean the ports are maintained by freebsd folks? >> Or not maintained at all? > > Not maintained at all. This is the charme of tcl/tk at work here, the > black magic that it is makes nobody want to make a commitment to the > stuff. :-) > > In the past, every once in a while somebody has submitted/committed an > update here or there, but nobody ever picked up maintainership. You can > check out who submitted/committed what in FreeBSD's cvsweb. > > However, tcl83/84, itk, itcl and iwidgets are a pretty broad base. You > might want to get a clearer idea first where the problem is located > before you go sending out questions to people. > I know where the problem is. The script cannot locate iwidgets. ldconfig shows that all the libraries for tcl, tk, itk and itcl are known, and the script isn't complaining about anything else being missing. So it appears to be a problem with locating iwidgets. I just haven't figured out yet how all of that ties together. I'll figure it out sooner or later. I'm stubborn like that. :-) Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 15:42:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4341616A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:42:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7377943D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:42:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2005 15:42:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) [129.187.19.157] by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 17:42:07 +0200 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CEB28C1BD; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:42:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:42:48 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Paul Schmehl , ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:42:10 -0000 --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roman Neuhauser wrote: [...] > If I create a new port for software I want to use on > FreeBSD (but don't want to maintain the port), I'll use >=20 > # New ports collection makefile for: $whatever > # Date created: $right_now > # Whom: Roman Neuhauser > ... > MAINTAINER=3D ports@FreeBSD.org Please don't do that! Otherwise you will force other people to fix, mark BROKEN or deprecate the port if it doesn't work properly, and I think, that's a bit unfair: You created it, because you obviously need it, but you don't consider it important enough that you also take some care of it, e.g. fix build errors = on other platforms, take care of bug reports, security issues etc. If you just need the port, but don't want to risk having to invest some more time for looking after it, please consider not submitting the port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org but keeping it locally. Otherwise, you shift your responsibilities onto others, who also only have a limited amount of time. I've Cc'ed Kris, who once had this plea not to commit new ports with maintainer ports@, in case he wants to correct me or add something. Simon --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6Pz4Ckn+/eutqCoRApgIAKCtSRzwijKY72r4WMP93/YoP0POdwCgu7sE C4qKriMhxwN097EvBaKSSxg= =Rwgt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:34:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4944616A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:34:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from virenp@mail.utexas.edu) Received: from smtp.cm.utexas.edu (smtp.cm.utexas.edu [146.6.135.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5B143D5E for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:34:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from virenp@mail.utexas.edu) Received: from mail.cm.utexas.edu (smtp.cm.utexas.edu [146.6.135.3]) by smtp.cm.utexas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F726DAD1; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:34:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 146.6.178.5 (SquirrelMail authenticated user vpatel) by mail.cm.utexas.edu with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:34:25 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <37551.146.6.178.5.1122568465.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> In-Reply-To: References: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <782A8803E0E45AF2882CE483@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <42812.146.6.178.5.1122499869.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <55749.146.6.178.5.1122500332.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:34:25 -0500 (CDT) From: "Viren Patel" To: "Petr Valenta" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache13-modssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 port broken?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: virenp@mail.utexas.edu List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:34:27 -0000 > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:38:52 +0200, Petr Valenta > > wrote: > >>>> --On Wednesday, July 27, 2005 16:08:14 -0500 Viren >>>> Patel >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am trying to install apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 >>>>> and >>>>> get the following: >>>>> >>>>> # make >>>>> ===> apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 has known >>>>> vulnerabilities: >>>>> => apache -- http request smuggling. >>>>> Reference: >>>>> >>>> 38a.html> => Please update your ports tree and try >>>>> again. >>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>> >>>>> Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl. >>>>> >>>>> I have updated the ports tree and the files directory >>>>> contains the patch for this vulnerability >>>>> (patch-secfix-CAN-2005-2088). >>>>> >>>>> I need to install this port urgently. What am I doing >>>>> wrong?? If the vulnerability has not been fixed, how >>>>> can >>>>> I >>>>> force install? TIA. >>>>> >>>> make FORCE_PKGREGISTER=yes && make install >>>> >>>> Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) >>>> Adjunct Information Security Officer >>>> University of Texas at Dallas >>>> AVIEN Founding Member >>>> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ >> >>> >>> Thanks for the quick reply but it doesn't work. I >>> thought >>> it was FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. Anyway, I tried it both ways >>> but no luck. Any other ideas? > > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes > New info. for me. Thanks. >>> >>> -- >>> Viren >>> >> >> Temporary solution: Uninstall portaudit. >> >> -- >> Viren >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:41:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D75316A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:41:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2085D43D77; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:41:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 804981F87BF1; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:41:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:41:11 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Simon Barner Message-ID: <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Simon Barner , Paul Schmehl , ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:41:16 -0000 # barner@FreeBSD.org / 2005-07-28 17:42:48 +0200: > Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > [...] > > If I create a new port for software I want to use on > > FreeBSD (but don't want to maintain the port), I'll use > > > > # New ports collection makefile for: $whatever > > # Date created: $right_now > > # Whom: Roman Neuhauser > > ... > > MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org > > Please don't do that! Otherwise you will force other people to fix, mark > BROKEN or deprecate the port if it doesn't work properly, and I think, > that's a bit unfair: > > You created it, because you obviously need it, but you don't consider it > important enough that you also take some care of it, e.g. fix build errors on > other platforms, take care of bug reports, security issues etc. > > If you just need the port, but don't want to risk having to invest some > more time for looking after it, please consider not submitting the port > with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org but keeping it locally. Otherwise, you > shift your responsibilities onto others, who also only have a limited amount > of time. > > I've Cc'ed Kris, who once had this plea not to commit new ports with > maintainer ports@, in case he wants to correct me or add something. Let's pretend the "tag-you're-it" regime is in force, which will make me think twice before I contribute a port (or send-pr a patch for anything unmaintained). I'll either maintain my changes (new ports and patches to existing ones) ouside the ports tree, which means increased overhead for me, and others will need to reinvent the wheel. Or, I'll accept the fact that my address must appear in MAINTAINER before you accept results of my work, but will ignore any and all PRs coming my way: I don't use the software in question enough to be a good maintainer, so I better don't waste my time. In the meantime, PRs for ports I have been sentenced to "maintain" hang in GNATS, and later the MAINTAINER either gets reset, or the port suffers from perpetual maintainer timeouts. The policy makers won, everybody else lost. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:48:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8F316A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03D543D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:48:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D01131F87BEF; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:48:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:48:04 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Viren Patel Message-ID: <20050728164804.GB66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Viren Patel , Petr Valenta , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <37675.146.6.178.5.1122498494.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <782A8803E0E45AF2882CE483@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <42812.146.6.178.5.1122499869.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <55749.146.6.178.5.1122500332.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> <37551.146.6.178.5.1122568465.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37551.146.6.178.5.1122568465.squirrel@mail.cm.utexas.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Petr Valenta , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache13-modssl-1.3.33+2.8.22_1 port broken?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:48:06 -0000 # virenp@mail.utexas.edu / 2005-07-28 11:34:25 -0500: > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:38:52 +0200, Petr Valenta > > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes > > > > New info. for me. Thanks. Try "man ports" and "$PAGER /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk". -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:56:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2478F16A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:56:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (mail-in-03.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EA243D48; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:56:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-09-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.21]) by mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAC04A851; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:56:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.48]) by mail-in-09-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC816A0AA; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:56:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dsl-082-083-044-241.arcor-ip.net [82.83.44.241]) by mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217E85D730; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:56:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SGu3Dx066862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:56:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:55:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl , Roman Neuhauser , Simon Barner , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:56:10 -0000 --nextPart1192740.zt3fEfnuCx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 28. July 2005 18:41, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > The policy makers won, everybody else lost. Hear hear. Of course, the regime actually already is in force and=20 port-submissions with ports@freebsd.org are no longer accepted. Given the=20 rate of port-submissions and the manpower available to deal with them, that= 's=20 arguably not all bad however. Patches/Updates for unmaintained ports don't make the submitter automatical= ly=20 the maintainer by the way. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart1192740.zt3fEfnuCx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC6Q4iXhc68WspdLARAoLvAJ9mCS+I1jY4aE7YNzHkrbSRpQUWmwCfQLhU VELWl4xZzZSJUVbq+oQSz8E= =7g9S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1192740.zt3fEfnuCx-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 16:56:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2478F16A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:56:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (mail-in-03.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EA243D48; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:56:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-09-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.21]) by mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAC04A851; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:56:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.48]) by mail-in-09-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC816A0AA; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:56:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dsl-082-083-044-241.arcor-ip.net [82.83.44.241]) by mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217E85D730; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:56:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SGu3Dx066862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:56:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:55:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl , Roman Neuhauser , Simon Barner , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:56:10 -0000 --nextPart1192740.zt3fEfnuCx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 28. July 2005 18:41, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > The policy makers won, everybody else lost. Hear hear. Of course, the regime actually already is in force and=20 port-submissions with ports@freebsd.org are no longer accepted. Given the=20 rate of port-submissions and the manpower available to deal with them, that= 's=20 arguably not all bad however. Patches/Updates for unmaintained ports don't make the submitter automatical= ly=20 the maintainer by the way. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart1192740.zt3fEfnuCx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC6Q4iXhc68WspdLARAoLvAJ9mCS+I1jY4aE7YNzHkrbSRpQUWmwCfQLhU VELWl4xZzZSJUVbq+oQSz8E= =7g9S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1192740.zt3fEfnuCx-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 17:00:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1B516A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:00:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB8F143D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:00:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2005 17:00:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) [129.187.19.157] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 28 Jul 2005 19:00:35 +0200 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 419AAC1BD; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:01:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:01:20 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Simon Barner , Paul Schmehl , ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050728170119.GC943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:00:37 -0000 --lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Let's pretend the "tag-you're-it" regime is in force, which will > make me think twice before I contribute a port (or send-pr a patch > for anything unmaintained). I'll either maintain my changes (new > ports and patches to existing ones) ouside the ports tree, which > means increased overhead for me, and others will need to reinvent > the wheel. >=20 > Or, I'll accept the fact that my address must appear in MAINTAINER > before you accept results of my work, but will ignore any and all > PRs coming my way: I don't use the software in question enough to > be a good maintainer, so I better don't waste my time. In the > meantime, PRs for ports I have been sentenced to "maintain" hang > in GNATS, and later the MAINTAINER either gets reset, or the port > suffers from perpetual maintainer timeouts. Yes, this is of course the obious reply to my message, and which is also probably why there is no official policy on this. Please regard my previous email as my _personal_ opinion and not as an offical statement of the project. Simon --lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6Q9fCkn+/eutqCoRAlOnAKDB83LZLjd2c3Ypi9imReztjltrlgCgp1C3 /yJCWGWj2iHS+9/lLXDYI5Y= =Ejgh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 17:04:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED6916A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:04:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023B643D48; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:04:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 99D8D29EE; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:04:01 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:04:01 -0500 To: Simon Barner , Paul Schmehl , ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:04:03 -0000 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:41:11PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > The policy makers won, everybody else lost. You're entitled to your opinion, but from the other side of the table it looks like this: What Kris and I see are hundreds of ports that are committed and then either a) are never updated, b) wind up not compiling when the base system is updated, c) wind up with PRs filed against them by users, for other problems ("doesn't work with XYZ"), that no one will ever deal with. In every case the users who install those ports aren't getting what they expect. How does this situation serve the users? Let me mention today's statistics: Total number of ports: 13281 Number of ports with no maintainer: 3670 (27.6%) I just can't see how this is a good situation. I no longer have the statistics online but from the last time I went through this it is about twice more likely that an unmaintained port: - has PRs against it - is broken - is out-of-date as versus the average maintained port. (Of course, some maintainers are far more active than others.) And yes, it's true that he and I do the majority of the cleanup work to flag and (if necessary) remove broken ports and so tend to be sensitive to the issue. But the idea that we have is that it's better to have a working port than a useless port. People need to decide what their vision of the Ports Collection is. Some folks seem to want every possible port included, whether or not it is up to date and working. I have, in particular, been trying to push us towards the direction of only having ports that we are going to use and maintain in it, on the theory that anything else is at some point going to waste some user's time somewhere down the road. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 17:16:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D501916A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:16:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EFC43D5C; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:16:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id C304929B2; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:16:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:16:33 -0500 To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20050728171633.GA11019@soaustin.net> References: <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <200507281856.02128.lofi@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507281856.02128.lofi@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Paul Schmehl , Roman Neuhauser , ports@freebsd.org, Simon Barner , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:16:35 -0000 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:55:56PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Of course, the regime actually already is in force and > port-submissions with ports@freebsd.org are no longer accepted. I don't know of any port that has been rejected on this account, even though it's what Kris and I have been pushing for. (Committers have been skirting the policy). The only port that I've actively suggested shouldn't be included was for a very specific function that FreeBSD doesn't even support, on the grounds that it seemed unlikely that it would ever be useful to more than one person. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 17:16:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D501916A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:16:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EFC43D5C; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:16:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id C304929B2; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:16:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:16:33 -0500 To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20050728171633.GA11019@soaustin.net> References: <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <200507281856.02128.lofi@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507281856.02128.lofi@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Paul Schmehl , Roman Neuhauser , ports@freebsd.org, Simon Barner , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:16:35 -0000 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:55:56PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Of course, the regime actually already is in force and > port-submissions with ports@freebsd.org are no longer accepted. I don't know of any port that has been rejected on this account, even though it's what Kris and I have been pushing for. (Committers have been skirting the policy). The only port that I've actively suggested shouldn't be included was for a very specific function that FreeBSD doesn't even support, on the grounds that it seemed unlikely that it would ever be useful to more than one person. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 17:22:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FAE16A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:22:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420D443D45; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:22:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 34A5B1F87BF1; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:22:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:22:49 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Linimon , Simon Barner , Paul Schmehl , ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl , Simon Barner , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:22:51 -0000 # linimon@lonesome.com / 2005-07-28 12:04:01 -0500: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:41:11PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > The policy makers won, everybody else lost. > > You're entitled to your opinion, but from the other side of the table > it looks like this: > > What Kris and I see are hundreds of ports that are committed and then > either a) are never updated, b) wind up not compiling when the base > system is updated, c) wind up with PRs filed against them by users, for > other problems ("doesn't work with XYZ"), that no one will ever deal with. > > In every case the users who install those ports aren't getting what they > expect. > > How does this situation serve the users? I am a member of the mythical "users" group, and I don't mind fixing whatever breakage I stumble upon as I go. > Let me mention today's statistics: > > Total number of ports: 13281 > Number of ports with no maintainer: 3670 (27.6%) > > I just can't see how this is a good situation. Would it be better if there were 9611 ports instead? How about "maintained" ports where the maintainers don't take proper care of their ports? I just don't see how no "designated maintainer" makes a port worse than port "maintained" by someone who refutes quite a bit of PRs with "I don't know, I only use minor part of the software, and that's all I can keep running". > I no longer have the statistics online but from the last time I went > through this it is about twice more likely that an unmaintained port: > > - has PRs against it > - is broken > - is out-of-date > > as versus the average maintained port. (Of course, some maintainers > are far more active than others.) > > And yes, it's true that he and I do the majority of the cleanup work to > flag and (if necessary) remove broken ports and so tend to be sensitive > to the issue. But the idea that we have is that it's better to have a > working port than a useless port. FMPOV the situation is "mostly working" vs none. > People need to decide what their vision of the Ports Collection is. > Some folks seem to want every possible port included, whether or not > it is up to date and working. I have, in particular, been trying to > push us towards the direction of only having ports that we are going > to use and maintain in it, on the theory that anything else is at some > point going to waste some user's time somewhere down the road. Again, I'm a user, and I rather spend 2 hours fixing a particular bug in an imperfect port than 8 hours creating it from scratch (and god knows how much time from then if I'm forced to maintain it). I've sent quite a few patches to various ports since I've started using FreeBSD, and my experience is that maintained ports (especially those "maintained" by certain @freebsd.org addresses) are more likely to have PRs hanging for a long time. The situation is a bit better with ports maintained by people without a @freebsd.org address, because committers usually don't bother waiting for approval. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 17:29:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F4516A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:29:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from db@TruNet.dk) Received: from cicero0.cybercity.dk (cicero0.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33E043D4C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:29:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from db@TruNet.dk) Received: from user1.cybercity.dk (user1.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.34]) by cicero0.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B622A66D for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:29:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from trinita (port132.ds1-arsy.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.239.73]) by user1.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C7974F870 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:29:47 +0200 (CEST) From: "db@trunet.dk" To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:31:12 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_AKT6CnlKkkyvbYV" Message-Id: <200507281931.12941.db@TruNet.dk> Cc: Subject: Port update: /devel/ccmalloc 0.3.9_2 -> 0.4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:29:56 -0000 --Boundary-00=_AKT6CnlKkkyvbYV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi all The reason I'm not sending this with send-pr is that I'm not sure whether this fix is correct or not. It builds fine on my i386 FreeBSD 5.4 system but I have deleted all pachtes, deleted a lot from the Makefile and I can't see why the port should depend on perl. So if someone could check the fix that would be great. Best regards db - Porting newbie...... --Boundary-00=_AKT6CnlKkkyvbYV Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset="us-ascii"; name="fix" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fix" diff -ruN /usr/ports/devel/ccmalloc/Makefile devel/ccmalloc/Makefile --- /usr/ports/devel/ccmalloc/Makefile Wed Jul 27 21:15:05 2005 +++ devel/ccmalloc/Makefile Thu Jul 28 15:36:29 2005 @@ -6,27 +6,17 @@ # PORTNAME= ccmalloc -PORTVERSION= 0.3.9 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTVERSION= 0.4.0 CATEGORIES= devel -MASTER_SITES= http://www2.inf.ethz.ch/personal/biere/projects/ccmalloc/ +MASTER_SITES= http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/biere/projects/ccmalloc/ MAINTAINER= jure@kom.org COMMENT= C/C++ memory profiler and memory leak tracer -USE_PERL5= yes USE_GMAKE= yes HAS_CONFIGURE= yes -CONFIGURE_ARGS= --prefix=${PREFIX} - -CC= gcc -g -Wall -CXX= g++ - .include -.if ${OSVERSION} > 500000 -EXTRA_PATCHES= ${FILESDIR}/patch5-configure -.endif post-install: @${CAT} pkg-message diff -ruN /usr/ports/devel/ccmalloc/distinfo devel/ccmalloc/distinfo --- /usr/ports/devel/ccmalloc/distinfo Wed Jul 27 21:09:44 2005 +++ devel/ccmalloc/distinfo Thu Jul 28 15:33:44 2005 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -MD5 (ccmalloc-0.3.9.tar.gz) = 9ba598edf3b21acc6a7a6196944f5af7 -SIZE (ccmalloc-0.3.9.tar.gz) = 57501 +MD5 (ccmalloc-0.4.0.tar.gz) = b90d955149569bbc6e801739f099db3d +SIZE (ccmalloc-0.4.0.tar.gz) = 57917 diff -ruN /usr/ports/devel/ccmalloc/files/patch-Makefile.in devel/ccmalloc/files/patch-Makefile.in --- /usr/ports/devel/ccmalloc/files/patch-Makefile.in Sat Apr 5 12:47:13 2003 +++ devel/ccmalloc/files/patch-Makefile.in Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@ ---- Makefile.in.orig Wed Jan 30 15:27:10 2002 -+++ Makefile.in Mon Mar 18 17:39:49 2002 -@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ - COMPILERS=@COMPILERS@ - TARGETS=lib/libccmalloc.a @TARGETS@ bin/ccmalloc - PREFIX=@PREFIX@ -+OPSYS=@OPSYS@ - - #--------------------------------------------------------------------------# - -@@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ - -e 's,@''PREFIX@,$(PREFIX),g' \ - -e 's,@''COMPILERS@,"$(COMPILERS)",g' \ - -e 's,@''VERSION@,@VERSION@,g' \ -+ -e 's,@''OPSYS@,@OPSYS@,g' \ - src/ccmalloc.in > $@ - chmod 755 $@ - diff -ruN /usr/ports/devel/ccmalloc/files/patch-src::ccmalloc.in devel/ccmalloc/files/patch-src::ccmalloc.in --- /usr/ports/devel/ccmalloc/files/patch-src::ccmalloc.in Sat Apr 5 12:47:13 2003 +++ devel/ccmalloc/files/patch-src::ccmalloc.in Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 @@ -1,29 +0,0 @@ ---- src/ccmalloc.in.orig Wed Jan 30 06:23:55 2002 -+++ src/ccmalloc.in Sat Apr 5 02:05:19 2003 -@@ -9,6 +9,13 @@ - # - COMPILERS=@COMPILERS@ - PREFIX=@PREFIX@ -+OPSYS=@OPSYS@ -+ -+case $OPSYS in -+ linux | solaris) COMP_ARGS='-lccmalloc -ldl';; -+ freebsd ) COMP_ARGS='-lccmalloc';; -+ *) COMP_ARGS='-lccmalloc -ldl';; -+esac - - usage () { - echo \ -@@ -104,10 +111,10 @@ - then - wrapper="$PREFIX/lib/ccmalloc-$CC.o" - echo "ccmalloc: using '$wrapper' as C++ wrapper" -- cmd="$args $wrapper -L$PREFIX/lib -lccmalloc -ldl" -+ cmd="$args $wrapper -L$PREFIX/lib $COMP_ARGS" - else - echo "ccmalloc: no C++ wrapper for '$base' installed" -- cmd="$args -L$PREFIX/lib -lccmalloc -ldl" -+ cmd="$args -L$PREFIX/lib $COMP_ARGS" - fi - - echo $cmd diff -ruN /usr/ports/devel/ccmalloc/files/patch5-configure devel/ccmalloc/files/patch5-configure --- /usr/ports/devel/ccmalloc/files/patch5-configure Sat Apr 12 00:42:11 2003 +++ devel/ccmalloc/files/patch5-configure Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 @@ -1,82 +0,0 @@ ---- configure.orig Wed Feb 6 01:20:53 2002 -+++ configure Sat Apr 5 04:43:02 2003 -@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ - fmt="%-26s ..." - debug=no - prefix=/usr/local --os=unsupported -+ -+OPSYS=unsupported - - #--------------------------------------------------------------------------# - # process command line options -@@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ - exit 0 - ;; - --prefix=*) -- prefix=`expr $1 : '--prefix=\(.*\)'` -+ prefix=`expr -- $1 : '--prefix=\(.*\)'` - ;; - --debug) - debug=yes -@@ -70,26 +71,26 @@ - SunOS ) - case `uname -r` in - 5.* ) -- os=solaris -+ OPSYS=solaris - ;; - esac - ;; - Linux ) -- os=linux -+ OPSYS=linux - ;; - FreeBSD ) -- os=freebsd -+ OPSYS=freebsd - ;; - esac - --if [ $os = unsupported ] -+if [ $OPSYS = unsupported ] - then - echo - echo "*** configure: unsupported operating system" 1>&2 - exit 1 - fi - --echo " $os" -+echo " $OPSYS" - - #--------------------------------------------------------------------------# - # search for C compilers -@@ -205,7 +206,7 @@ - } - EOF - --case $os in -+case $OPSYS in - freebsd ) - LIB="" - ;; -@@ -285,8 +286,9 @@ - ( - echo "#ifndef _config_h_INCLUDED" - [ $debug = no ] && echo "#define NDEBUG" --[ $os = solaris ] && echo "#define OS_IS_SOLARIS" --[ $os = linux ] && echo "#define OS_IS_LINUX" -+[ $OPSYS = solaris ] && echo "#define OS_IS_SOLARIS" -+[ $OPSYS = linux ] && echo "#define OS_IS_LINUX" -+[ $OPSYS = freebsd ] && echo "#define OS_IS_FREEBSD" - [ $atexit = yes ] && echo "#define HAVE_ATEXIT" - cat<<-EOF - #define VERSION "$version" -@@ -319,6 +321,7 @@ - -e "s,@COMPILERS@,$COMPILERS,g" \ - -e "s,@VERSION@,$version,g" \ - -e "s,@TARGETS@,$TARGETS,g" \ -+-e "s,@OPSYS@,$OPSYS,g" \ - Makefile.in > $dst - - echo >> $dst --Boundary-00=_AKT6CnlKkkyvbYV-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 17:37:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6760D16A425; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:37:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from tinker.exit.com (tinker.exit.com [206.223.0.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513A643D58; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:36:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from [206.223.0.5] (realtime [206.223.0.5]) by tinker.exit.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SHawVX096629; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:36:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Message-ID: <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:36:58 -0700 From: Frank Mayhar User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050725) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Neuhauser References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.1/995/Wed Jul 27 13:13:50 2005 on tinker.exit.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl , Simon Barner , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:37:00 -0000 Roman Neuhauser wrote: > The policy makers won, everybody else lost. Bullshit. Remember that you're getting all of this for _free_. You are benefiting from the hard work of many others and yet you complain when you are asked to contribute work yourself. In my case, I take it for granted that if I update a port there's a damned good chance that I will be the stuckee for future problems with that port. I guess I've worked as a software engineer for long enough that I expect to exhibit a certain level of professionalism. This means supporting my code, even if the system/subsystem/application in question didn't originally have my name on it. I personally sympathize far more with the folks who are trying to maintain this stuff than with those who whine that they shouldn't be expected to actually support the stuff that they have submitted. In my clearly NSH opinion, FreeBSD is better off without the unmaintained/broken/obsolete ports. At least until someone feels strongly enough to pick them up and maintain them. I _certainly_ think that a port submitted with a maintainer of 'ports@freebsd.org' should hit the bit bucket immediately and never see the light of day. If it's important enough to submit, it should be important enough to maintain. -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 17:49:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACBE16A420 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:49:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE40343D5F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:49:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05519388D81 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:49:54 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:49:54 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:49:58 -0000 --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 10:36:58 -0700 Frank Mayhar wrote: > Roman Neuhauser wrote: >> The policy makers won, everybody else lost. > > Bullshit. Remember that you're getting all of this for _free_. You are > benefiting from the hard work of many others and yet you complain when > you are asked to contribute work yourself. > > In my case, I take it for granted that if I update a port there's a > damned good chance that I will be the stuckee for future problems with > that port. I guess I've worked as a software engineer for long enough > that I expect to exhibit a certain level of professionalism. This means > supporting my code, even if the system/subsystem/application in question > didn't originally have my name on it. > > I personally sympathize far more with the folks who are trying to > maintain this stuff than with those who whine that they shouldn't be > expected to actually support the stuff that they have submitted. In my > clearly NSH opinion, FreeBSD is better off without the > unmaintained/broken/obsolete ports. At least until someone feels > strongly enough to pick them up and maintain them. > > I _certainly_ think that a port submitted with a maintainer of > 'ports@freebsd.org' should hit the bit bucket immediately and never see > the light of day. If it's important enough to submit, it should be > important enough to maintain. > While I sympathize with and agree with much of what you're written, let's look at the practical application of your last paragraph. I decided to create new ports for a program called sguil. It's a network security monitoring program that offers great potential for usefulness to security professionals like myself. I had never created a port before, so I was starting from scratch. I quickly learned that, for the port to even build, I had to have a port for barnyard. So I created one. It took me while, but it's not part of the tree. I then discovered that, for the sguil port to work, I had to create a port for sancp. I did that too, and that's been accepted. Now I've finally created ports for the sensor and server portions of sguild, and I'm working on the client portion. If FreeBSD adopts the policy you suggest in your last paragraph, hat would me that I would *also* have to take over maintainence for the following ports: tcl, itcl, tk and iwidgets. Can you imagine for a moment how intimidated I would have been had I had to take on that additional challenge? I am not a programmer. I've taken classes in C++ and Java, and I write perl scripts fairly regularly. Trying to solve compile problems is, for me, time consuming and confusing. Furthermore, I have a fulltime job (and we're not talking 40 hours here either) just trying to keep a university secure - one of the most inhospitable places on the planet for security folks. If we adopted your suggestion, there would be no port for sguil, because I never would have taken it on. I would have given up. And that means there would also be no port for barnyard, and no port for sancp. Is that what you want? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 17:51:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFACB16A423; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:51:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E128E43D4C; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:51:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 58BB79A6; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:51:42 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:51:42 -0500 To: Mark Linimon , Simon Barner , Paul Schmehl , ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:51:44 -0000 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 07:22:49PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > I am a member of the mythical "users" group, and I don't mind fixing > whatever breakage I stumble upon as I go. And many users are in that same situation and that's fine; but many others are either unwilling or lack the skills to do so. See the GNATS DB for many examples. If things don't work for them, they're stuck. > Would it be better if there were 9611 ports instead? If they all worked -- yes! > How about "maintained" ports where the maintainers don't take proper > care of their ports? That's why we have that policy (there's that word again) that maintainers who don't maintain their ports after 3 months can have their ports reassigned. People have been reluctant to do that because the maintainers are also volunteers and we try to respect their feelings (see below). > I just don't see how no "designated maintainer" makes a port worse > than port "maintained" by someone who refutes quite a bit of PRs > with "I don't know, I only use minor part of the software, and > that's all I can keep running". At least someone is looking after it in the latter case; there is someone the users can ask questions of, even if the answer is "I don't know". It is not an ideal situation, but it is a better situation than having noone. > FMPOV the situation is "mostly working" vs none. Most users don't expect "mostly working". They look at this list, see that they can install something from it, and then get aggravated when they find out they've wasted their time trying to use it. > I've sent quite a few patches to various ports since I've started > using FreeBSD, and my experience is that maintained ports > (especially those "maintained" by certain @freebsd.org addresses) > are more likely to have PRs hanging for a long time. The situation > is a bit better with ports maintained by people > without a @freebsd.org address, because committers usually don't > bother waiting for approval. This is like saying that one bad situation justifies another. This is not good logic. It's an unpopular thing to try to hold ports maintainers accountable for actually maintaining their ports -- especially in the cases of FreeBSD committers, who IMHO ought to be held to a higher standard, since they've already gone through a process which has shown that they are willing to accept responsibility for work that they do on the project. This work does go on and it's behind the scenes and best done while wearing asbestos garb. Since everyone working on ports if a volunteer, we have no effective means of forcing anyone to do anything. Gentle reminders and requests are the best methods (again IMHO) to try to fix these problems. In any case, I believe that there are only a handful of maintainers that fall into this category. Spend an hour looking at portsmon's various pages and I think you'll come to the same conclusion. Again, I don't see how the idea that some maintainers don't maintain their ports means that we should not bother to try to get ports assigned to responsible people who will actively maintain them. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 18:00:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0CB16A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:00:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@virtual-voodoo.com) Received: from energistic.com (mail.energistic.com [216.54.148.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC0643D48; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:00:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@virtual-voodoo.com) Received: from stevenew ([71.98.120.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by energistic.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SI0dVI013337; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:00:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from steve@virtual-voodoo.com) Message-ID: <00a501c5939e$452e5f70$aa00030a@officescape.net> From: "Steve Ames" To: "Koop Mast" , "Steve Ames" References: <20050718175416.I72944@hades.admin.frm2> <20050719155248.apdm04x2wwgo8wg0@netchild.homeip.net> <20050719152818.GA64202@energistic.com> <1121788205.35721.7.camel@heater.rainbow-runner.nl> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:00:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_FAIL, USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on energistic.com Cc: net/asterisk maintainer , Joerg Pulz , ports@freebsd.org, Sergey Matveychuk , net/asterisk-oh323 maintainer , Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: devel/pwlib and net/openh323 update coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:00:54 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Koop Mast" Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:50 AM Subject: Re: devel/pwlib and net/openh323 update coming > > The PR I submitted only addresses pwlib and openh323. Your patch covers > > other ports which is great. I'd had a couple of patches (e.g. gatekeeper) > > to update to current version and utilize newer pwlib/openh323 but mainly > > was going to wait until pwlib/openh323 where in the tree. > > I will merge the two patches to gather and post it somewhere so people > can test it. This may take a day or so, because the 2 patches use a > different approach to things and I got some family time on the agenda. Koop, any update on this? > > > >You can get it at: > > > >ftp://ftp.frm2.tum.de/pub/jpulz/FreeBSD/pwlib_openh323-20050719.patch > > > >The md5 checksum is: > > > >MD5 (pwlib_openh323-20050719.patch) = 889c6cce0824c25d96aa935c0cdb99b6 > > > > I'll take a look at these today or tomorrow. Koop is the go to guy at > > the moment. I believe he has a pthread concern that he's trying to solve > > before doing this update. Perhaps your patches already address that? > > I would just like to say that with Steve his patches ldap_open check > fails but with Joerg his patches it succeeds. I'm ready for the loony > bin. Heh. Yeah that's fairly frustrating. -Steve > > -steve > > Sorry for the bad english, its almost evening here but I'm still kind of > sleeping :). > > Koop > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 18:28:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2204216A420; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:28:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7AE43D46; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:28:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1DyD79-000Jov-2q; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:28:15 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:28:15 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050728182815.GB35496@voodoo.oberon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2" Content-Disposition: inline X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE Keywords: 579279786 Cc: Subject: [REMINDER] HEADS UP: Ports freeze for FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:28:51 -0000 --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline It's just reminder that ports for 6.0 RELEASE is scheduled to begin on August 01, 2005 20:00 UTC. The ports tree will be frozen for two weeks until August 15, 2005. -Kirill --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6SO/QC1G6a60JuURAmvqAKD1eddYDpgmtHPCm453MCVw/zFLTACdFcXo ATy87Icy3wEcH+moc1BLgsU= =1HoB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 18:30:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13C116A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:30:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330DA43D75; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:29:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1DyD8D-000Jpy-Bm; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:29:21 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:29:21 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050728182921.GC35496@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <20050728182815.GB35496@voodoo.oberon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728182815.GB35496@voodoo.oberon.net> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE Keywords: 579279786 Cc: Subject: Re: [REMINDER] HEADS UP: Ports freeze for FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:30:01 -0000 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:28:15PM +0200, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > It's just reminder that ports for 6.0 RELEASE is scheduled to begin ^^^ Ports freeze is meant of course. -Kirill From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 20:36:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A4616A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:36:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from ylpvm29.prodigy.net (ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A5043D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:36:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (pimout3-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.218]) by ylpvm29.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6SKa6sx030500 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:36:06 -0400 X-ORBL: [66.136.206.1] Received: from maul.immure.com (adsl-66-136-206-1.dsl.austtx.swbell.net [66.136.206.1]) by pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6SKaZpI076260 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:36:36 -0400 Received: from luke.immure.com (luke.immure.com [10.1.132.3]) by maul.immure.com (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6SKaTG7002739 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:36:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from luke.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by luke.immure.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6SKaT8I027564 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:36:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@luke.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by luke.immure.com (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j6SKaT1E027563 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:36:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:36:29 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: ports list Message-ID: <20050728203629.GC24417@luke.immure.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-immure-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-immure-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: bob@immure.com Subject: Anyone know where glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8.amd64.rpm is? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bob Willcox List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:36:38 -0000 I was trying to install the net/skype port on my FreeBSD-6.0-BETA1 AMD64 system and ran into the problem that the glibc rpm file could not be fetched: => glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8.amd64.rpm doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/rpm/amd64/8.0. => Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/redhat/redhat/linux/updates/8.0/en/os/amd64/. grep: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8/distinfo.amd64: No such file or directory fetch: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/redhat/redhat/linux/updates/8.0/en/os/amd64/glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8.amd64.rpm: Not Found ... => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/i386/8.0/. grep: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8/distinfo.amd64: No such file or directory fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/i386/8.0/glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8.amd64.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/rpm/amd64/8.0 and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/linux-expat. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/skype. So, anyone know where the glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8.amd64.rpm can be found? Thanks, Bob -- Bob Willcox Reality is nothing but a collective hunch. bob@immure.com -- Lily Tomlin Austin, TX From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 20:40:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA36D16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:40:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@corp.grupos.com.br) Received: from mail.grupos.com.br (mail.grupos.com.br [200.203.183.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4053B43D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:40:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@corp.grupos.com.br) Received: from corp.grupos.com.br (unknown [150.162.166.55]) by mail.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C84911EF78; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:40:43 -0300 (BRT) Received: from corp.grupos.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corp.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF5C5691; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:40:43 -0300 (BRT) Received: from [150.162.166.51] (noc.grupos.com.br [150.162.166.51]) by corp.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005565698; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:40:42 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <42E950DA.5090501@corp.grupos.com.br> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:40:42 -0400 From: Marcus Grando User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.0+ (X11/20050728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, janos.mohacsi@bsd.hu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: mrtg error after upgrade net/p5-IO-INET6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:40:45 -0000 FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE #1: Wed Jul 27 11:09:35 BRT 2005 p5-IO-Socket-INET6-2.51 mrtg-2.12.2,1 # mrtg Use of reserved word "our" is deprecated at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/IO/Socket/INET6.pm line 13. Global symbol "@ISA" requires explicit package name at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/IO/Socket/INET6.pm line 13. Global symbol "$VERSION" requires explicit package name at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/IO/Socket/INET6.pm line 13. BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/SNMP_Session.pm line 587. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/SNMP_util.pm line 43. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/MRTG_lib.pm line 21. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/bin/mrtg line 85. -- Marcus Grando Grupos Internet S/A marcus(at)corp.grupos.com.br From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 20:48:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CBD16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:48:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from tinker.exit.com (tinker.exit.com [206.223.0.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0934043D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:48:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from [206.223.0.5] (realtime [206.223.0.5]) by tinker.exit.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SKm7Vb098223; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:48:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Message-ID: <42E94487.6090909@exit.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:48:07 -0700 From: Frank Mayhar User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050725) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.1/995/Wed Jul 27 13:13:50 2005 on tinker.exit.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:48:08 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: >> I _certainly_ think that a port submitted with a maintainer of >> 'ports@freebsd.org' should hit the bit bucket immediately and never see >> the light of day. If it's important enough to submit, it should be >> important enough to maintain. >[Tale of woe elided; if you want to read it, it's in the archives.] First off, this is commonly referred to as "biting off more than you can chew." Perhaps you should have chosen something a little smaller as your first port? It is certainly acceptable for someone to put together a "port" that is good enough for internal use without ever bringing it up to port-quality for submission. I have done that several times with various packages that weren't worth my time to fully port-ize. From time to time I have also submitted patches to an existing port in order to fix it so that I can use it as a dependency for something of mine. > Now I've finally created ports for the sensor and server portions of > sguild, and I'm working on the client portion. If FreeBSD adopts the > policy you suggest in your last paragraph, hat would me that I would > *also* have to take over maintainence for the following ports: tcl, > itcl, tk and iwidgets. Let's look at what I wrote in my "last paragraph." I said: I _certainly_ think that a port submitted with a maintainer of 'ports@freebsd.org' should hit the bit bucket immediately and never see the light of day. If it's important enough to submit, it should be important enough to maintain. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but tcl, itcl, tk and iwidgets were already in ports, were they not? So they could not possibly have been "submitted with a maintainer of 'ports@freebsd.org.'" Of course, this is not to say that you should not have been the stuckee for those ports. If you learned enough to update them, you probably learned enough to continue to maintain them. (You may not have had the _time_ to maintain them, but that's an entirely different issue.) Quite honestly, if you were to feel intimidated, that's _your_ problem. If you feel too intimidated to take something on, then don't do so, but also don't complain that it hasn't been addressed. In short, this isn't Linux. The people here are professionals and expect at least a certain amount of professionalism from the others on the project. This is, in my opinion also being a professional, a reasonable expectation. > If we adopted your suggestion, there would be no port for sguil, because > I never would have taken it on. I would have given up. And that means > there would also be no port for barnyard, and no port for sancp. > > Is that what you want? Believe me, that situation would have been preferable the content of this thread. As far as the package itself is concerned, I honestly don't care. If I _did_ care, though, I would do something about it, either privately or in public, and I would do my damnedest to adhere to professional standards. I wouldn't whine about how doing it right is too "intimidating." Ultimately, this is a tempest in a teapot. If you can't maintain those ports, you can't, and no amount of browbeating is going to change that. On the other hand, don't expect the FreeBSD folks to change their policy just to make you feel better. -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 20:50:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C05F16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:50:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1EB43D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:50:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6SKotNV023734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:50:55 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6SKos6P024345; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:50:55 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 67C2D5128C; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:50:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:50:49 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20050728205049.GA28459@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:50:56 -0000 --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:49:54PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > >I _certainly_ think that a port submitted with a maintainer of > >'ports@freebsd.org' should hit the bit bucket immediately and never see > >the light of day. If it's important enough to submit, it should be > >important enough to maintain. > > > While I sympathize with and agree with much of what you're written, let's= =20 > look at the practical application of your last paragraph. >=20 > I decided to create new ports for a program called sguil. It's a network= =20 > security monitoring program that offers great potential for usefulness to= =20 > security professionals like myself. >=20 > I had never created a port before, so I was starting from scratch. I=20 > quickly learned that, for the port to even build, I had to have a port fo= r=20 > barnyard. So I created one. It took me while, but it's not part of the= =20 > tree. I then discovered that, for the sguil port to work, I had to creat= e=20 > a port for sancp. I did that too, and that's been accepted. >=20 > Now I've finally created ports for the sensor and server portions of=20 > sguild, and I'm working on the client portion. If FreeBSD adopts the=20 > policy you suggest in your last paragraph, hat would me that I would *als= o*=20 > have to take over maintainence for the following ports: tcl, itcl, tk and= =20 > iwidgets. No, because you didn't submit those ports. The rule is in place for *new ports* to make submitters take responsibility that their new ports actually work, and so that when a broken port is added to the tree, someone knows they are on the hook to fix the problems that appear with it, whether they are submitted by me, or other users of FreeBSD. It is *very common* for new ports to not work as committed (for various reasons that I can go into if you like), and it is often necessary for a few rounds of fixes to be developed and committed before all problems are resolved. The rule became necessary after too many ports were committed in a broken and unusable state, and the submitters and committers refused to address the issues because they assumed that "someone else would fix them". That's pretty irresponsible, and such ports in the tree waste my time and waste the time of other FreeBSD users, so this behaviour is no longer allowed. The bottom line is that if you care enough to submit a port for FreeBSD, you need to care enough to make sure you submit a *working* port to FreeBSD, and that means you list yourself as maintainer at least for the first month or so until it is clear that there are no outstanding problems with the port. After then, you can drop maintainership if you really don't want to continue to support the FreeBSD community in this way. Kris --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6UUpWry0BWjoQKURArlVAKC7FmDtfSEfOHj+Roh9tXlv4KNNrgCgi96H YUIwRT85xEyHjudiao7RJ7s= =AQRS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 20:55:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E98216A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:55:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B5D43D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:55:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1DyFPK-000K94-UJ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:55:10 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:55:10 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Jan-Peter Koopmann Message-ID: <20050728205510.GE35496@voodoo.oberon.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE Keywords: 579279786 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Exim 4.52 with SPF fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:55:47 -0000 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 02:34:59PM +0200, Jan-Peter Koopmann wrote: > Hi, > > is this a known problem: > > proxy:/usr/ports/mail/exim # make WITH_SPF=yes > ===> Building for exim-4.52 > `Makefile' is up to date. > > > cc spf.c > spf.c: In function `spf_open': > spf.c:36: `SPF_server_t' undeclared (first use in this function) > spf.c:36: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > spf.c:36: for each function it appears in.) > spf.c:36: `spf_server' undeclared (first use in this function) > spf.c:37: `SPF_DNS_CACHE' undeclared (first use in this function) > spf.c: In function `spf_close': > spf.c:46: `SPF_server_t' undeclared (first use in this function) > spf.c:46: `spf_server' undeclared (first use in this function) > spf.c: In function `spf_find': > spf.c:52: `SPF_server_t' undeclared (first use in this function) > spf.c:52: `spf_server' undeclared (first use in this function) > spf.c:53: `SPF_request_t' undeclared (first use in this function) > spf.c:53: `spf_request' undeclared (first use in this function) > spf.c:54: `SPF_response_t' undeclared (first use in this function) > spf.c:54: `spf_response' undeclared (first use in this function) > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim/work/exim-4.52/build-FreeBSD-i386/lookups. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim/work/exim-4.52/build-FreeBSD-i386. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim/work/exim-4.52. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim. Yeah, sorry for this, I wasn't aware about this breakage. I hope I'll find time to fix it, if not, I would appreciate if somebody else pick up this task. -Kirill From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:00:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865A316A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:00:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F28F43D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:00:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 56DD829B2; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:00:13 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:00:13 -0500 To: Frank Mayhar Message-ID: <20050728210013.GA18923@soaustin.net> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <42E94487.6090909@exit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E94487.6090909@exit.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:00:14 -0000 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 01:48:07PM -0700, Frank Mayhar wrote: > Now correct me if I'm wrong, but tcl, itcl, tk and iwidgets were already > in ports, were they not? So they could not possibly have been "submitted > with a maintainer of 'ports@freebsd.org.'" For sake of completeness, yes, they could have. The policy is fairly new. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:07:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8182E16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:07:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D9743D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:07:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFEA388D6C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:07:27 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:07:27 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <0EB20BCBD44B0B602ECD6117@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <42E94487.6090909@exit.com> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <42E94487.6090909@exit.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:07:28 -0000 --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 13:48:07 -0700 Frank Mayhar wrote: > > Let's look at what I wrote in my "last paragraph." I said: > > I _certainly_ think that a port submitted with a maintainer of > 'ports@freebsd.org' should hit the bit bucket immediately and > never see the light of day. If it's important enough to submit, > it should be important enough to maintain. > > Now correct me if I'm wrong, but tcl, itcl, tk and iwidgets were already > in ports, were they not? So they could not possibly have been "submitted > with a maintainer of 'ports@freebsd.org.'" Of course, this is not to say > that you should not have been the stuckee for those ports. If you > learned enough to update them, you probably learned enough to continue to > maintain them. (You may not have had the _time_ to maintain them, but > that's an entirely different issue.) > > Quite honestly, if you were to feel intimidated, that's _your_ problem. > If you feel too intimidated to take something on, then don't do so, but > also don't complain that it hasn't been addressed. > I'm not sure why you're being so obtuse. I am not complaining. I'm simply saying that if we no longer allow ports with a maintainer of ports, there are problems that will arise that need to be thought through. Obviously, if I *really* felt intimidated, I wouldn't be submitting the ports, would I? But not everyone is quite as ambitious as I am, and some might actually not bother to ever submit a port if they had to create or fix others to get theirs working. If the goal is to have working ports for the community, then ISTM that there should not be rules in place that *discourage* new port submitters from even trying. > > Believe me, that situation would have been preferable the content of this > thread. As far as the package itself is concerned, I honestly don't > care. If I _did_ care, though, I would do something about it, either > privately or in public, and I would do my damnedest to adhere to > professional standards. I wouldn't whine about how doing it right is too > "intimidating." > I wasn't whining. You should have recognized that. > > Ultimately, this is a tempest in a teapot. If you can't maintain those > ports, you can't, and no amount of browbeating is going to change that. > On the other hand, don't expect the FreeBSD folks to change their policy > just to make you feel better. Gee, and here I thought we were actually trying to *encourage* people to adopt ports. Silly me. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:08:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E6F16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:08:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177C243D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:08:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC579388D53 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:08:44 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:08:44 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20050728205049.GA28459@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <20050728205049.GA28459@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:08:45 -0000 --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 16:50:49 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > The rule is in place for *new ports* to make submitters take > responsibility that their new ports actually work, and so that when a > broken port is added to the tree, someone knows they are on the hook > to fix the problems that appear with it, whether they are submitted by > me, or other users of FreeBSD. > > It is *very common* for new ports to not work as committed (for > various reasons that I can go into if you like), and it is often > necessary for a few rounds of fixes to be developed and committed > before all problems are resolved. > > The rule became necessary after too many ports were committed in a > broken and unusable state, and the submitters and committers refused > to address the issues because they assumed that "someone else would > fix them". That's pretty irresponsible, and such ports in the tree > waste my time and waste the time of other FreeBSD users, so this > behaviour is no longer allowed. > > The bottom line is that if you care enough to submit a port for > FreeBSD, you need to care enough to make sure you submit a *working* > port to FreeBSD, and that means you list yourself as maintainer at > least for the first month or so until it is clear that there are no > outstanding problems with the port. After then, you can drop > maintainership if you really don't want to continue to support the > FreeBSD community in this way. > Thanks, Kris, that makes a great deal of sense. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:13:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C40816A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:13:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAA143D49 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:12:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 4484829E8; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:12:59 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:12:59 -0500 To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20050728211259.GB18923@soaustin.net> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:13:01 -0000 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:49:54PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Can you imagine for a moment how intimidated I would have been had I had > to take on that additional challenge? I'm sympathetic to this (there are a _lot_ of things to know about how the Ports Collection works), but the transpose is that it still leaves the ports in a situation where no one is signed up to trying to fix them if/when they break. > Trying to solve compile problems is, for me, time consuming and confusing. It's not necessarily going to be any less time consuming for any other FreeBSD volunteer :-/ And there's the problem -- who's going to do the work going forwards? In FreeBSD, there is no mystical "they". It's just us, the volunteers. (AFAIK no one is paid to work on ports.) > If we adopted your suggestion, there would be no port for sguil, because > I never would have taken it on. I would have given up. And that means > there would also be no port for barnyard, and no port for sancp. > > Is that what you want? What we want is fewer broken ports. Everything else is derived from that. We want to encourage more people to contribute -- both in writing ports, sending PRs, and maintaining ports -- but we want to keep in mind this goal of having as many ports as possible, working. The alternative is to read Slashdot about how the FreeBSD Ports Collection is junk because nothing works right and submitted PRs are never worked on. (IMHO the poster is wrong, of course, but there's the perception -- and yes, this is in a current subthread.) mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:21:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2E916A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:21:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@corp.grupos.com.br) Received: from mail.grupos.com.br (mail.grupos.com.br [200.203.183.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C1C43D5E for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:21:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@corp.grupos.com.br) Received: from corp.grupos.com.br (unknown [150.162.166.55]) by mail.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C9C11EF88; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:21:08 -0300 (BRT) Received: from corp.grupos.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corp.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82FC55AE; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:21:07 -0300 (BRT) Received: from [150.162.166.51] (noc.grupos.com.br [150.162.166.51]) by corp.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDCA555D; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:21:07 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <42E95A53.9070805@corp.grupos.com.br> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:21:07 -0400 From: Marcus Grando User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.0+ (X11/20050728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kirill Ponomarew , Jan-Peter.Koopmann@seceidos.de, ports@freebsd.org References: <20050728205510.GE35496@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <20050728205510.GE35496@voodoo.oberon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: Re: Exim 4.52 with SPF fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:21:14 -0000 Kirill, I have patch to update mail/libspf2 to 1.2.5. I test all dependencies (mail/postfix-policyd-spf need changes) and after that submit to upgrade. Exim problem is: >http://www.exim.org/ftp/ChangeLogs/ChangeLog-4.52: >TK/02 Rewrote SPF support to work with libspf2 versions >1.2.0. Jan, Please upgrade mail/libspf2 with this patch http://corp.grupos.com.br:8080/~marcus/patch/libspf2.patch Regards Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 02:34:59PM +0200, Jan-Peter Koopmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is this a known problem: >> >> proxy:/usr/ports/mail/exim # make WITH_SPF=yes >> ===> Building for exim-4.52 >> `Makefile' is up to date. >> >> >> cc spf.c >> spf.c: In function `spf_open': >> spf.c:36: `SPF_server_t' undeclared (first use in this function) >> spf.c:36: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once >> spf.c:36: for each function it appears in.) >> spf.c:36: `spf_server' undeclared (first use in this function) >> spf.c:37: `SPF_DNS_CACHE' undeclared (first use in this function) >> spf.c: In function `spf_close': >> spf.c:46: `SPF_server_t' undeclared (first use in this function) >> spf.c:46: `spf_server' undeclared (first use in this function) >> spf.c: In function `spf_find': >> spf.c:52: `SPF_server_t' undeclared (first use in this function) >> spf.c:52: `spf_server' undeclared (first use in this function) >> spf.c:53: `SPF_request_t' undeclared (first use in this function) >> spf.c:53: `spf_request' undeclared (first use in this function) >> spf.c:54: `SPF_response_t' undeclared (first use in this function) >> spf.c:54: `spf_response' undeclared (first use in this function) >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim/work/exim-4.52/build-FreeBSD-i386/lookups. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim/work/exim-4.52/build-FreeBSD-i386. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim/work/exim-4.52. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/mail/exim. > > Yeah, sorry for this, I wasn't aware about this breakage. I hope > I'll find time to fix it, if not, I would appreciate if somebody > else pick up this task. > > -Kirill > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Marcus Grando Grupos Internet S/A marcus(at)corp.grupos.com.br From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:23:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6520016A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:23:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2A643D48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:23:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1DyFqR-000KFF-93; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:23:11 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:23:11 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Marcus Grando Message-ID: <20050728212311.GF35496@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <20050728205510.GE35496@voodoo.oberon.net> <42E95A53.9070805@corp.grupos.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E95A53.9070805@corp.grupos.com.br> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE Keywords: 579279786 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Exim 4.52 with SPF fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:23:50 -0000 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:21:07PM -0400, Marcus Grando wrote: > Kirill, > > I have patch to update mail/libspf2 to 1.2.5. I test all dependencies > (mail/postfix-policyd-spf need changes) and after that submit to upgrade. > > Exim problem is: > >http://www.exim.org/ftp/ChangeLogs/ChangeLog-4.52: > >TK/02 Rewrote SPF support to work with libspf2 versions >1.2.0. > > Jan, > > Please upgrade mail/libspf2 with this patch > http://corp.grupos.com.br:8080/~marcus/patch/libspf2.patch Cool, I overlooked this entry in ChangeLog, thanks for patching libspf2. -Kirill From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:27:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF75216A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:27:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A57543D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:27:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so498235wra for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:27:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uK8SajJ09dAAoHxN48Oc+i/sadL8GlBfiWvReNyOwZ/7HWUHwGRUdbAXkJucskyxvX9DXWYK2P6IEm4vSiOt3rLyWBp+vD5DLI0ZxmxQJnxK55dGJFEywDpmYLT+Vvm77txK0yTk+B5ZhhI5hxh0nG9z4PmsCZGW7pfnp4Xwva4= Received: by 10.54.56.5 with SMTP id e5mr987043wra; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.29.26 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff050728142793c7588@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:27:21 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel To: Paul Schmehl In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scot Hetzel List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:27:23 -0000 On 7/28/05, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Now I've finally created ports for the sensor and server portions of > sguild, and I'm working on the client portion. If FreeBSD adopts the > policy you suggest in your last paragraph, hat would me that I would *als= o* > have to take over maintainence for the following ports: tcl, itcl, tk and > iwidgets. >=20 > Can you imagine for a moment how intimidated I would have been had I had = to > take on that additional challenge? I am not a programmer. I've taken You wouldn't have to take on an additional challenge if one of the dependant ports is broken for a port your creating, what you could do is: 1. if MAINTAINER is not ports@, send a message to the MAINTAINER of the p= ort 2. Send a PR for the port with a description of the breakage and a build.log containing the error 3. Same as 2, but you also correct the problem in the port, and include a Patch in the PR 4. Same as 3, and also ask to take maintainership if MAINTAINER is ports@= . 5. Send a message to ports@ to see if anyone else had a problem with that port, and a if they have a solution Scot --=20 DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:31:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFF616A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:31:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17F143D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:31:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5AF388D94 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:31:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:31:08 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff050728142793c7588@mail.gmail.com> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <790a9fff050728142793c7588@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:31:11 -0000 --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 16:27:21 -0500 Scot Hetzel wrote: > > You wouldn't have to take on an additional challenge if one of the > dependant ports is broken for a port your creating, what you could do > is: > > 1. if MAINTAINER is not ports@, send a message to the MAINTAINER of the > port 2. Send a PR for the port with a description of the breakage and a > build.log containing the error > 3. Same as 2, but you also correct the problem in the port, and > include a Patch in the PR > 4. Same as 3, and also ask to take maintainership if MAINTAINER is > ports@. 5. Send a message to ports@ to see if anyone else had a problem > with that port, and a if they have a solution > Thanks, Scot. That's helpful to know. I wasn't aware, for example, that anyone could submit PRs for a broken port. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 21:36:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DDA16A448 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:36:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stas.yakovlev@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C416F43D4C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:36:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stas.yakovlev@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so773657rne for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:36:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=klv2LKcyi+ujv4LGtNPGWFutyD7tPAr+lircvkjjUhtmbnZ+xK+vN32cdtHoxfVGVuqLeOrogL0XHNxLs+p8LFB260NUe7weoWQfuN7PBjUvls6rxg2R+PAdh8IRwuU+d3mFwCWp5yRqUL3Yd6LrIiXaZCftrsuB7qlBlg0WclE= Received: by 10.39.2.68 with SMTP id e68mr1411016rni; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.208.42 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:36:39 +0400 From: Stas Yakovlev To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Suggestion] update net/libnet & net/libnet-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stas Yakovlev List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:36:41 -0000 Hi All. I think it's time to update net/libnet & net/libnet-devel As you know Existing versions (from developer) 1.0.2a Deprecated 1.0.x Tree (unsupported) 1.1.2.1 Latest Stable Version 1.1.3 Latest Beta Version Current status in ports 1.0.2a net/libnet 1.1.2.1 net/libnet-devel [! Important !] There's no backward compatibility=20 between Versions 1.0.2a and 1.1.2.1. !!!!!!!!!!!! Solution can be: move net/libnet -> net/libnet10 (this for ports which still depends on API version 1.0.2a); copy net/libnet-devel (1.1.2.1) -> net/libnet; update net/libnet-devel from version 1.1.2.1 to 1.1.3.1. Status in ports at the end 1.0.2a net/libnet10 1.1.2.1 net/libnet 1.1.3 net/libnet-devel What do you think about this ? P.S: I allready contact with ports@FreeBsd.org and mainteiners but without luck(no reply) Stanislav. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 22:11:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BEA16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:11:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2CB43D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:11:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DyGbL-0001Gd-FC for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:11:39 +0200 Received: from gn-hgk-15cd4.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([81.69.122.212]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:11:39 +0200 Received: from A.S.Usov by gn-hgk-15cd4.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:11:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Alexander S. Usov" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:11:32 +0200 Organization: KVI Lines: 9 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: gn-hgk-15cd4.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: KNode/0.9.1 Sender: news Subject: Possible bug in bsd.ruby.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:11:43 -0000 Hi! Just have tried to rebuild devel/root (as it was recently updated) and have found that it won't compile for me due to a bug in bsd.ruby.mk, which unconditionally overwrites CONFIGURE_TARGET. -- Best regards, Alexander. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 22:16:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389D316A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:16:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hood.oook.cz (hood.oook.cz [212.27.205.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4419243D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:16:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ikaros.oook.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hood.oook.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6SMGJc7099220 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:16:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by ikaros.oook.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6SMGJrS099219; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:16:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ikaros.oook.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Paul Schmehl In-Reply-To: <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <790a9fff050728142793c7588@mail.gmail.com> <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MWd83V51/LmmsDgjxbUK" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:16:19 +0200 Message-Id: <1122588979.97751.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:16:22 -0000 --=-MWd83V51/LmmsDgjxbUK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul Schmehl p=ED=B9e v =E8t 28. 07. 2005 v 16:31 -0500: > --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 16:27:21 -0500 Scot Hetzel=20 > wrote: > > > > You wouldn't have to take on an additional challenge if one of the > > dependant ports is broken for a port your creating, what you could do > > is: > > > > 1. if MAINTAINER is not ports@, send a message to the MAINTAINER of t= he > > port 2. Send a PR for the port with a description of the breakage and= a > > build.log containing the error > > 3. Same as 2, but you also correct the problem in the port, and > > include a Patch in the PR > > 4. Same as 3, and also ask to take maintainership if MAINTAINER is > > ports@. 5. Send a message to ports@ to see if anyone else had a probl= em > > with that port, and a if they have a solution > > > Thanks, Scot. That's helpful to know. I wasn't aware, for example, that= =20 > anyone could submit PRs for a broken port. Please don't do that, unless you also submit a fix. Because committers are few and usually are not very familiar with the given broken port. Such PRs tend to be left untouched for years and then swept under the carpet too often. --=20 Pav Lucistnik --=-MWd83V51/LmmsDgjxbUK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC6VkyntdYP8FOsoIRAnWgAKCjgAld/iV6nKmVn5uwm+08LtDKogCglRxJ ZEeQkgxOAI+8lZT0d2RcuS8= =eRDM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MWd83V51/LmmsDgjxbUK-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 22:56:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC42D16A421; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:56:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB53A43D46; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:56:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 904451F87BEF; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:56:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:56:50 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Linimon , Simon Barner , Paul Schmehl , ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl , Simon Barner , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:56:53 -0000 # linimon@lonesome.com / 2005-07-28 12:51:42 -0500: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 07:22:49PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > I am a member of the mythical "users" group, and I don't mind fixing > > whatever breakage I stumble upon as I go. > > And many users are in that same situation and that's fine; but many > others are either unwilling or lack the skills to do so. See the GNATS > DB for many examples. If things don't work for them, they're stuck. > > > Would it be better if there were 9611 ports instead? > > If they all worked -- yes! Then we have a conflict (which is no problem), as I prefer something I can "tweak" to something I need to build from nothing. > > How about "maintained" ports where the maintainers don't take proper > > care of their ports? > > That's why we have that policy (there's that word again) that maintainers > who don't maintain their ports after 3 months can have their ports > reassigned. So, where do we end? With MAINTAINER=ports@FreeBSD.org ports. Where's the difference? > > I just don't see how no "designated maintainer" makes a port worse > > than port "maintained" by someone who refutes quite a bit of PRs > > with "I don't know, I only use minor part of the software, and > > that's all I can keep running". > > At least someone is looking after it in the latter case; there is > someone the users can ask questions of, even if the answer is "I don't > know". It is not an ideal situation, but it is a better situation > than having noone. "looking after it"? There's someone who hasn't reacted to PRs for at least several months, someone "the users" (emphasis added) can ask questions of in vain, even if the answer always is (two months later) "maintainer timeout". > > FMPOV the situation is "mostly working" vs none. > > Most users don't expect "mostly working". They look at this list, > see that they can install something from it, and then get aggravated > when they find out they've wasted their time trying to use it. I have written several different responses to this paragraph, and deleted them all. Let me ask a question instead: can you show me some hard facts about those mysterious "most users"? You know, I'd really like to see a proof that most of the FreeBSD users are what you call them: *users* (emphasis added to point out the derogative). And if you do manage to prove that most users of FreeBSD are what you imply: people who cant read a simple Makefile to find out the dependencies for example, peeple who can't fix a simple problem in a port Makefile they wanted to use, then I'll concede it's time to look elsewhere. > Again, I don't see how the idea that some maintainers don't maintain > their ports means that we should not bother to try to get ports assigned > to responsible people who will actively maintain them. The part from "we should" on isn't what you have been advocating in this (sub)thread. I applaud to your effort to find qualified, responsible maintainer for every port. What I don't find appealing at all is what you advertised effor leads to in practice. I have already been bitten by the (very politely formulated) "either accept the ball bound to your foot or sod off" policy, I have already had my name written over code I heartily disagreed with (because I ended up as a committer-by-force on a port I send a patch for, and what was committed was quite a bit different from what I would even *consider* if it was my tree; cool, isn't it, having your name slapped on a lame code written by someone else, huh?), and I'm just a bit afraid I'm not going to let a "comittee" hold me hostage to my patches. Yes, this email is bitter. I've had quite a few bitter moments over my contributions to FreeBSD. They (the contributions) have been minor, and, what do I know, maybe you wouldn't mind losing 150 patches commited within a month, but there might be no more: I just won't bother, because I'll be a *user*. I won't contribute because that's the professionals' job, instead I'll be your mythical user. I won't lose any more of my time on any of http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports&sort=none&originator=neuhauser&closedtoo=on I'll wait for someone who can commit their life to the software to fix every little problem for me. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 22:58:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA93D16A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:58:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC6A43D4C; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:58:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5F9001F87BF1; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:58:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:58:54 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Frank Mayhar Message-ID: <20050728225854.GF66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Frank Mayhar , ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl , Simon Barner , Kris Kennaway References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl , Simon Barner , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:58:56 -0000 # frank@exit.com / 2005-07-28 10:36:58 -0700: > Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > The policy makers won, everybody else lost. > > Bullshit. Remember that you're getting all of this for _free_. You are > benefiting from the hard work of many others and yet you complain when you > are asked to contribute work yourself. No sir, I'm getting this for the time I've spent on my 200+ commited patches to the ports tree. How many are on your account? -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 23:11:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC1816A420; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:11:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE45F43D5F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:11:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D22531F87BEF; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:11:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:11:38 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Frank Mayhar Message-ID: <20050728231138.GG66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Frank Mayhar , Simon Barner , ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl , Kris Kennaway References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl , Simon Barner , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:11:41 -0000 # frank@exit.com / 2005-07-28 10:36:58 -0700: > Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > The policy makers won, everybody else lost. > > Bullshit. Remember that you're getting all of this for _free_. You are > benefiting from the hard work of many others and yet you complain when you > are asked to contribute work yourself. You know, this reply of yours was quite inconsiderate. I've spent a good part of 2003 maintaining a patch for all ports in the pear virtual category before it got commited; several months of keeping up with other changes to the tree, and it took a few months before Edwin finally got around to commiting it. I have contributed significant functionality to devel/subversion, I have fixed/updated 160 unfetchable/unbuildable ports across the tree within a month. I have written most of the search target in ports. And I have had a good time doing it all. I don't believe that's bullshit. Do you? -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 23:33:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53EA16A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:33:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from mail3out.barnet.com.au (mail3out.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C61643D5D; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:33:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by mail3out.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 27) id 450CB877CB3; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:33:36 +1000 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <42E96B5000017918071ECC@BarNet> Received: from mail3-auth.barnet.com.au (mail3.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.barnet.com.au", Issuer "BarNet Root Certificate Authority" (verified OK)) by mail3.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1952A877C94; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:33:36 +1000 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (edwin-3.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "edwin.adsl.barnet.com.au", Issuer "BarNet Root Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mail3-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B225F877C5E; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:33:35 +1000 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 320D264C8; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:33:34 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:33:34 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Simon Barner , Paul Schmehl , ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050728233334.GF1186@k7.mavetju> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:33:38 -0000 On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:41:11PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > Or, I'll accept the fact that my address must appear in MAINTAINER > before you accept results of my work, but will ignore any and all > PRs coming my way: I don't use the software in question enough to > be a good maintainer, so I better don't waste my time. In the > meantime, PRs for ports I have been sentenced to "maintain" hang > in GNATS, and later the MAINTAINER either gets reset, or the port > suffers from perpetual maintainer timeouts. If you're going to play silly games, expect to be played silly games with. Or in other words, people will start to actively ignore your new ports based on their experience with your current ports. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 23:54:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616F816A41F; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:54:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1473F43D49; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:54:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix, from userid 1022) id 0C45131980B; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:54:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEE131F406; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:54:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:54:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050728193334.P7262@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Phil Homewood , jeh@FreeBSD.org Subject: misc/amanda / Users X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:54:54 -0000 all, re: ports/73956 ...although the approach used in this PR is a great improvement, should we really be defaulting to using 'operator:backup' if no user is set? Won't that encourage people to unlock the operator account by assigning it a valid shell, or even a password? It's unlikely people will take the high ground and execute all Amanda commands from sudo(8). Aren't there hooks for creating psuedo accounts in Ports? For example, in NetBSD pkgsrc there's a PKG_USERS and PKG_GROUPS that can be assigned with low UID values. If so, why not default to creating an 'amanda' or 'backup' user in the secondary group operator? It's just that Amanda has some serious fudemental security issues as it is (no offense to them, it works well), such RHosts style authentication, depedency on inetd/xinetd, and lack of inline network encryption. I just think we should be more proactive; I think even recent versin of Redhat ship it with an amanda user. --- Also, we should probably add a pkg-message for the client and server mentioning required entries in inetd.conf(5), or is the thinking here that Amanda is so involved that people are going to refer to the docs anyway? P.S., this would be an excellent use for the IPSec hooks in inetd(8). ~BAS l8* -lava From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 00:29:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A17016A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:29:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from smtpq1.home.nl (smtpq1.home.nl [213.51.128.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A3243D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:29:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from [213.51.128.133] (port=41291 helo=smtp2.home.nl) by smtpq1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DyIkM-0002oS-KB for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:29:06 +0200 Received: from cp464173-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.215.228]:52701 helo=desktop.homenet) by smtp2.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DyIkJ-00047y-Mn for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:29:03 +0200 From: Danny Pansters To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:27:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <1122588979.97751.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <1122588979.97751.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> X-Face: "0Qv=,p:+]LvuqrtS4U\z3k"qN=.1]@=?utf-8?q?=258=3F=3BPoab=23v=27F=7E=0A=09!Wm=5Fe-=24=7EL=5D=3B?=>[c*L^Qoladj)x@mH}Bqz"vLO?Zdl}[@V@=?utf-8?q?U=3Fx3=23lI=3A=0A=09=24DN=7E!Hr?=@K`-mNv"zXm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507290227.09027.danny@ricin.com> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:29:09 -0000 I'd like to contribute some observations. I think these may be of general notice. (1) We have too many ports as it is. Of course we also have too many unmaintained ports but the fact is that for the present workforce we have too many ports altogether. And although we have a very good influx we'll have too many ports 2 years ahead also and likely 4 as well. They're growing exponentionally. (2) There are quite a lot of ports that are not up to what we should consider QA standards. Most but not all of them comprise unmaintained ports. (personal idea: nuke approximately half of them) (3) So there appear to have been some very capable people who perhaps partially got their commit bits to ports by bringing in lots of, ultimately unmaintained, ports. Question: why this route to commit-dom anyway? I for one love to add and maintain useful ports but heck I don't want to be a committer. Could it be that previous practice invited this behaviour? I'd say yes. (4) So, what about another and more realistic route to being a committer vs being a contributor? For example, a committer could assume a "mentor-light" role for ports contributors, and ideally commiters wouldn't have to be contributors themselves at all (fat chance I know ;-). Or we could have pointyhat by-proxy of the committer so that the chain of communication is as short as it needs to be. Those kinds of things can surely be improved and would help to keep new people aboard. But, yeah, it would involve some "rules". I'd also like to express some of my own experience and ideas, mostly in reply to Paul, and of personal notice: (Roman may want to read also... you first dismiss what appears to be my sort of "users" as not wotrhy and after that we appear to be having the same annoyances:) I'm not a programmer either. The only thing I learnt at uni was half baked turbo pascal (6 weeks) and a crash course to DOS (3 weeks). In hindsight the most useful thing I learnt was tex. At a later stage (~ 1996) I discovered the internet and later on (~1998) Linux. In 2000 I started using FreeBSD. I've only done a Java course once (after uni), and since then I taught myself to use python and FreeBSD. All my understanding from C and C++ comes from that starting point. So obviously I'm often stumped when working on a port, but googling and bsd.ports.mk'ing along I get by. That is not to say that sometimes maybe some more focused help from the FreeBSD people (the committers) might be exactly what's needed. In the meantime I took over all ports that have to deal with python bindings to qt or kde and maintaining them. I like it. I like python for GUI stuff and intend to bring that onto FreeBSD as a Qt/KDE development platform and have it be increasingly better and complete (most of this depends on the original authors also). So that developers can use it (myself first of course ;-). Yes, I have problems everytime, whether because the snapshot changed a lot or because of my ever trying to have the ports themselves behave more the same, but I'll maintain them until I lose interest and if I do I'll leave them in a working state. I feel that's expected. Besides, if nothing would ever break it wouldn't be fun. If that is what Frank means to say then I can only agree. I want "my" stuff to work well and as expected, otherwise i rather retreat it. Or ask for help. I can spell an example of a port I've gotten across that was nearly-working when committed and since then half baked until an update to one of the ports I maintain broke it. I wont name it :) but neither will I fix it. And there are many cases like that. As I said before ideally committers would not need to maintain any ports themselves, obviously this is not true today but wouldn't that be a much better goal than to just have as many ports as get thrown in and never mind QA? QA is more important than quantity. It's the committers who should (and in practice of course mostly are) looking after QA. And their job can be made easier if less crap ports without maintainers are committed. I can use nicer words, but that's how it is. Please note, Paul, that as far as I have seen no one has been posting who really put any contributor down for "biting off too much". It's a common problem. I know it all to well. You can either work harder, ask for help, give it time (don't underestimate this one ;-) or give up. The latter is OK also. We're only human. I fully agree with Mark and Kris on having a moratorium on _new_ ports without a maintainer. They'll only cause harm later on if no one picks them up. It creates expectations that cannot be met. A 1-3 month time period perhaps and then if nobody becomes mainainer it gets slated for removal (even at that stage someone could chip in). That's very reasonable IMHO. Someone has to clean the mess somewhere. Just my EUR 0.02, Cheers, Dan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 02:13:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555DA16A41F; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:13:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C064344086; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:13:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 5FAAF29A6; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:13:22 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:13:22 -0500 To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20050729021322.GB28471@soaustin.net> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <790a9fff050728142793c7588@mail.gmail.com> <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <1122588979.97751.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1122588979.97751.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:13:23 -0000 On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:16:19AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Thanks, Scot. That's helpful to know. I wasn't aware, for example, that > > anyone could submit PRs for a broken port. > > Please don't do that, unless you also submit a fix. > > Because committers are few and usually are not very familiar with the > given broken port. Such PRs tend to be left untouched for years and then > swept under the carpet too often. I'm going to disagree with Pav here. If a port doesn't work, we ought to know about it so we can at least e.g. mark it as IGNORE like: IGNORE= "installs but core dumps" Then if someone wants to install it, at least they know that there's rough water ahead, and, if they aren't technical, to just avoid the port altogether. This way we've at least told people what to expect, upfront, to try to save them time. To reiterate for people that don't know, we use BROKEN for ports that fail the install/deinstall sequence or don't fetch or break INDEX builds. These are the ports that are periodically removed*. IGNORE is used for all other kinds of failures. Ports that meet this definition of BROKEN from day one, should never be committed in the first place. That's not just my opinion, I think I can speak for portmgr on that one. That's the least level of QA that I believe is required. mcl * ok, FORBIDDEN ports are periodically removed as well. Those are ports with security problems. And, for sake of completeness, ports with licensing problems can be and are removed without prior notice if the software authors so insist. But to date we have not removed any port just_ because it is unmaintained, nor do I think there would ever be any support for such a thing. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 02:23:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A139A16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:23:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE5E43D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:23:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 9B2AE29A6; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:23:32 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:23:32 -0500 To: Danny Pansters Message-ID: <20050729022332.GC28471@soaustin.net> References: <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <1122588979.97751.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <200507290227.09027.danny@ricin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507290227.09027.danny@ricin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:23:33 -0000 On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 02:27:08AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote: > (1) We have too many ports as it is. [...] > (2) There are quite a lot of ports that are not up to what we should consider > QA standards. Most but not all of them comprise unmaintained ports. (personal > idea: nuke approximately half of them) I can speak to this issue with some authority, since I designed the DEPRECATED/EXPIRATION_DATE system and have put a lot of work into it. Each time we have scheduled another batch of ports for deletion -- just the ones that don't install/deinstall/fetch/make describe -- it's created controversy. People are really unhappy to see ports that they used get slated for removal. The good part is that somewhere between 50%-70% of the ports that are so flagged _actually get fixed_ by this process. So if the process of removing ports that are "broken" by an easily gauged technical standard is controversial, just think how controversial it'll be to pull hundreds or thousands of ports that _pass_ this technical standard. Past experience suggests to me that the flamewar that would erupt from this would burn for months. I, personally, would spend no effort on such a thing. Keep in my that _your_ useless port is someone's else's favorite. Who decides? This would never reach consensus. > (3) So there appear to have been some very capable people who perhaps > partially got their commit bits to ports by bringing in lots of, ultimately > unmaintained, ports. I really doubt that anyone has done this solely to gain a commit bit -- I think this is more a result of the model of "commit things that might be useful to someone, somewhere, at some point." I'd rather impute the best possible motives to people's actions here. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 02:37:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B6F16A420; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:37:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F0043EAD; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:02:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 2EECB29E7; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:02:25 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:02:25 -0500 To: Mark Linimon , Simon Barner , Paul Schmehl , ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050729020225.GA28471@soaustin.net> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:37:54 -0000 On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:56:50AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > So, where do we end? With MAINTAINER=ports@FreeBSD.org ports. > Where's the difference? The difference is that we don't just give up and start out that way. There's at least _someone_ who will stand behind the code that got committed to the tree, for at least _some_ period in time. > "looking after it"? There's someone who hasn't reacted to PRs for > at least several months, someone "the users" (emphasis added) can > ask questions of in vain, even if the answer always is (two months > later) "maintainer timeout". Yes, there are maintainers who need to be reset. I have already made that point. > > Most users don't expect "mostly working". They look at this list, > > see that they can install something from it, and then get aggravated > > when they find out they've wasted their time trying to use it. > > I have written several different responses to this paragraph, > and deleted them all. Let me ask a question instead: can you > show me some hard facts about those mysterious "most users"? No, just the last 2-3 years of reading through postings to the various ports-related mailing lists. I do not save all the postings that I've replied to trying to help people. > You know, I'd really like to see a proof that most of the FreeBSD > users are what you call them: *users* (emphasis added to point out > the derogative). That's your derogative -- not mine. Please don't misattribute quotes to me or put words in my mouth, thanks. This thread is problematic enough without that. I mean "user" in this case to be someone who, without necessarily having an understanding the mechanisms by which the Ports Collection works, sees something they want to install because it's neat, and tries to do so. > And if you do manage to prove that most users > of FreeBSD are what you imply: people who can't read a simple > Makefile to find out the dependencies for example, people who > can't fix a simple problem in a port Makefile they wanted to use, > then I'll concede it's time to look elsewhere. Your model of FreeBSD seems to be that everyone has at least a medium technical level of expertise. But I see people trying to use FreeBSD where that's not the case. There is plenty of evidence in GNATS. However, even if this turns into a What Is FreeBSD thread ("only for experts? something for everyone?"), I won't continue to follow up to it, because all that's done is to fill up various mailing lists before, and it's something that is never going to come to consensus. No, I don't think that _most_ users of FreeBSD have less than a medium level of techical expertise, so perhaps I should not have said _most_. But yes, I do believe that some don't. No, I don't believe we should, by default, dismiss the latter out of hand. I think we ought to make a best effort to make sure that things work to the extent that, _in general_, people don't have to try to edit Makefiles to make a port install and run correctly. What's more telling is the fact that many problems with ports are _not_ simple dependency problems, distfile mismatches, and the like. There are many, much harder, problems, that we should not be anticipating that anyone without a _high_ level of technical expertise is going to be able to take on. Again, GNATS is full of these kinds of problems -- especially the oldest PRs -- and more often than not, they sit there for months and years. I think this is A Bad Thing. > I have > already been bitten by the (very politely formulated) "either accept > the ball bound to your foot or sod off" policy, I have already had > my name written over code I heartily disagreed with (because I ended > up as a committer-by-force on a port I send a patch for, and what > was committed was quite a bit different from what I would even > *consider* if it was my tree; cool, isn't it, having your name > slapped on a lame code written by someone else, huh?) I don't know any of the particulars you're talking about so I can't address them. If you don't want your name on anything, have it taken off -- you are no more or less a volunteer than whoever committed the code, or me, or anyone, so no one can 'force' you to do anything on this project. If you disagree with something that was done with your name on it, by all means, say so. As for what individual committers did, you should take it up with them: if you get treatment you consider unacceptable, then bring it to the attention of portmgr. (If it will allay your concerns, I will recuse myself from any followups on those issues.) There is obviously not going to be any agreement here between the two camps of 'commit only things that we can guarantee will be useful' and 'commit anything that might be useful to someone, somewhere, at some point.' Frankly if we go to the latter it will save me, personally, an awful lot of effort that I try to put forth, and I will instead go work on my own interesting hacks. If people feel strongly enough that this single requiremet is too burdensome, then maybe they should investigate setting up a ports-wip (Work In Progress) repository somewhere to hold 'might work, good luck' code. NetBSD uses this model as pkgsrc-wip; you don't even need to be a NetBSD committer to add things to it. (Disclaimer: I merely lurk on the NetBSD lists and am not intimately familiar with their processes.) However, I should caution that a wip, or sandbox, or whatever, area, is not a "universal solution" either: there seems to be continuing tension between the people that want to see new packages (their term for ports) only be committed to pkgsrc and only once they are well-tested, and the people who just want to try out things in the sandbox area. Then pkgsrc users wonder why the things in wip aren't in the main tree, and aren't satisfied with the answer "no one can guarantee yet that it will actually work right." Further, it divides the attention of people who are actually interested in new packages -- which one should they try to get it added to? Again, I don't like the wip model and so I'm not going to spend any of my own time working on setting it up, but I'm not going to try to talk anyone out of it, either. I mention it out of completeness, and to try to offer some kind of concrete suggestion that will possibly offer a way out of this disagreement. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 04:08:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562B816A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:08:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web51612.mail.yahoo.com (web51612.mail.yahoo.com [68.142.224.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C45F143D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:08:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 60783 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jul 2005 04:08:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=joPeVaQDOqmexxmSQJCMyDCe805zIqutofOj/s7T21EZlSid50hqrMIRPM7of/MnFZOswH+vNStieuBHPvdEUFYHuscO3P/waERgi4r4ILUS9XL01a158tlhxx6c5f4dlIfvoBimf1rqI5ALUdkNJTXkWlR0a+CcTEJswbngX8A= ; Message-ID: <20050729040834.60781.qmail@web51612.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [208.30.41.90] by web51612.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:08:34 CEST Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:08:34 +0200 (CEST) From: To: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: Subject: itcl and iwidgets (was Re: Question about maintainers) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:08:35 -0000 Hi Paul; AFAIK I submitted the last itcl/itk update. One reason why your new port doesn't work may be because iwidgets hasn't been updated (it's not an easy task). There is more information on the PR for itcl and in a thread on -ports, but it all sums up to itcl/itk ports being ill conceived (hacked). After looking at NetBSD's pkgsrc and Darwin ports I got to the conclusion that we need a new itcl-devel port that grabs the latest bits (containing both itcl and itk) from the CVS; that way an updated iwidgets port can find a consistent itcl tree and configure properly. I just never found the time to fix itcl properly so for the time being I only cleaned some of the hacks we had been using for years. hope that helps, Pedro. ___________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo http://it.beta.messenger.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 10:01:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8761A16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:01:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from legalois@acm.org) Received: from smtp6.wanadoo.fr (smtp6.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B1543D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:01:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from legalois@acm.org) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0612.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BB18D1C000C4 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:01:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (ADijon-151-1-75-2.w83-196.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.196.105.2]) by mwinf0612.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6F0221C00154 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:01:37 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050729100137454.6F0221C00154@mwinf0612.wanadoo.fr Message-ID: <42E9FC98.3000102@acm.org> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:53:28 +0200 From: Jake Lloyd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: mysql41-server upgrade stalls--but why? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: legalois@acm.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:01:39 -0000 On a 5.1 box, that has already been running MySQL4.1 for some time... Portupgrade failed to upgrade MySQL Sever from 4.1.12 to 4.1.13. I tried # cd /usr/ports/databases/mysql41-server # make but I got this: ===> Building for mysql-server-4.1.13 make all-recursive Making all in include make all-am Making all in Docs Making all in strings Making all in dbug Making all in mysys /bin/cp ./thr_alarm.c ./test_thr_alarm.c /usr/local/bin/libtool15 --preserve-dup-deps --mode=link cc -DDBUG_OFF -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -D_THREAD_SAFE -rpath=/usr/local/lib -o test_thr_alarm -DDEFAULT_BASEDIR=\"/usr/local\" -DDATADIR="\"/var/db/mysql\"" -DDEFAULT_CHARSET_HOME="\"/usr/local\"" -DSHAREDIR="\"/usr/local/share/mysql\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../include -I../include -I. -DDBUG_OFF -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -D_THREAD_SAFE -DMAIN ./test_thr_alarm.c libmysys.a ../dbug/libdbug.a ../strings/libmystrings.a -lc_r -lcrypt -lm -lc_r cc -DDBUG_OFF -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -D_THREAD_SAFE -rpath=/usr/local/lib -o test_thr_alarm -DDEFAULT_BASEDIR=\"/usr/local\" -DDATADIR=\"/var/db/mysql\" -DDEFAULT_CHARSET_HOME=\"/usr/local\" -DSHAREDIR=\"/usr/local/share/mysql\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../include -I../include -I. -DDBUG_OFF -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -D_THREAD_SAFE -DMAIN ./test_thr_alarm.c libmysys.a ../dbug/libdbug.a ../strings/libmystrings.a -lcrypt -lm *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql41-server/work/mysql-4.1.13/mysys. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql41-server/work/mysql-4.1.13. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql41-server/work/mysql-4.1.13. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql41-server. ~ I don't know, what is the problem? Thanks, very much - Jake From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 10:22:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE89316A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:22:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6FF43D4C for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:21:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5D0851F87BEF; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:21:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:21:58 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20050729102158.GA73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Linimon , ports@freebsd.org References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729020225.GA28471@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050729020225.GA28471@soaustin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:22:00 -0000 Marc, this mail is a bit lengthy, but please read it as a portmgr team member. # linimon@lonesome.com / 2005-07-28 21:02:25 -0500: > > You know, I'd really like to see a proof that most of the FreeBSD > > users are what you call them: *users* (emphasis added to point out > > the derogative). > > That's your derogative -- not mine. Please don't misattribute quotes > to me or put words in my mouth, thanks. This thread is problematic > enough without that. Yes, sorry, I didn't mean to put anything in your mouth; the derogative was mine. > I think we ought to make a best effort to make sure that things work > to the extent that, _in general_, people don't have to try to edit > Makefiles to make a port install and run correctly. That's my thoughts exactly. I just don't think mandatory maintainership will help in this regard, or will bite us somewhere else. > There is obviously not going to be any agreement here between the > two camps of 'commit only things that we can guarantee will be useful' > and 'commit anything that might be useful to someone, somewhere, at > some point.' Frankly if we go to the latter it will save me, personally, > an awful lot of effort that I try to put forth, and I will instead go > work on my own interesting hacks. > > If people feel strongly enough that this single requiremet is too > burdensome, then maybe they should investigate setting up a ports-wip > (Work In Progress) repository somewhere to hold 'might work, good luck' > code. NetBSD uses this model as pkgsrc-wip; you don't even need to be > a NetBSD committer to add things to it. (Disclaimer: I merely lurk > on the NetBSD lists and am not intimately familiar with their processes.) This looks like I somehow caused you to think that I advocate committing halfbaked ports. That's not the case. I'll try to explain my point using a specific, realworld example. On 2005-03-22, George Gesslein II, author of a mathematical software called mathomatic and a FreeBSD nonuser asked on ports@ whether someone could create a port for it: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-ports&m=111147502513960&w=2 I sent a PR with the port the same day. MAINTAINER was set to ports@FreeBSD.org, because I have zero use for the software. I wrote the port because I thought it might be useful to someone else (the author probably thoughts so if he requested the port): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/79118 Then: From: Roman Neuhauser To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/79118: [NEW PORT] math/mathomatic Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:19:34 +0100 # mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com / 2005-03-22 15:57:42 -0500: > Roman, why would not you be the maintainer? Ok, sign me up. /me sighs I had had a reply written saying that I'd simply be a very bad maintainer for the port (for the above mentioned reasons), but the thought of the ping pong ("why not?", "c'mon, you can do it!", etc [hyperbole, but that's what you guys do, and it's not pleasant]) wasn't too attractive, so I bowed. On 2005-04-11, thierry committed a modified version of the port without consulting the changes with me (but put my address in MAINTAINER). The original submission wasn't perfect: I forgot to handle NOPORTDOCS. Thierry should have told me to fix the problem, there was no rush after all, but that didn't happen. He didn't mention that the code is different from the PR number quoted in the commit message either. On 2005-05-18, Ying-Chieh Liao sent a PR updating the port to a newer version, with cc to me. That was nice: I don't use the software, and wasn't even aware that there was a new release. So, what do we have here? Am I the maintainer? What does that actually mean anyway? These are honest, serious questions I would like to get answers to, because I don't see a practical difference besides the value of MAINTAINER; in practice, you guys don't lose your time honoring the variable's value. This wasn't an isolated incident, and I expect having my name put on further pieces of someone else's code without permission as I continue contributing my little bits. You know, talking to you as the portmgr team member, you do have a problem with port maintainership handling, but it's a different one from "too many ports@FreeBSD.org ports". Ying-Chieh's patch nicely brings forth the other side of the story: he/she hadn't created the port him-/herself, but updating it to a newer version was easy enough. *That* is what I meant by "I'll create a port, someone will probably find it useful", I have *not* pushed the idea that ports that meet the criteria for BROKEN on arrival should be committed! From where I'm standing, bringing the port in (even "unmaintained") looks like a win. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 10:37:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDA316A46D for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:37:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D0943D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:37:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 01DA61F87BEF; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:37:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:37:06 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Edwin Groothuis Message-ID: <20050729103706.GB73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Edwin Groothuis , ports@freebsd.org References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728233334.GF1186@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728233334.GF1186@k7.mavetju> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:37:08 -0000 # edwin@mavetju.org / 2005-07-29 09:33:34 +1000: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:41:11PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > Or, I'll accept the fact that my address must appear in MAINTAINER > > before you accept results of my work, but will ignore any and all > > PRs coming my way: I don't use the software in question enough to > > be a good maintainer, so I better don't waste my time. In the > > meantime, PRs for ports I have been sentenced to "maintain" hang > > in GNATS, and later the MAINTAINER either gets reset, or the port > > suffers from perpetual maintainer timeouts. > > If you're going to play silly games, expect to be played silly games > with. > > Or in other words, people will start to actively ignore your new > ports based on their experience with your current ports. Yup, and I don't want to do that. I can occasionaly spend a week or two working on a port (http://cvs.sf.net/viewcvs.py/gri/gri/doc/gri.texi?r1=1.187&r2=1.188&diff_format=u) but if I cannot promise to be a good maintainer for it for various reasons, I shouldn't be forced to. Of course, you can tell me to take it or leave it, but is that an improvement? -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 10:59:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DE016A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:59:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B97043D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:59:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 138D21F87BF1; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:59:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:59:04 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20050729105904.GC73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Linimon , ports@freebsd.org References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:59:05 -0000 # linimon@lonesome.com / 2005-07-28 12:04:01 -0500: > I no longer have the statistics online but from the last time I went > through this it is about twice more likely that an unmaintained port: > > - has PRs against it > - is broken > - is out-of-date I cannot dispute the latter two, but have you included these in your calculations? When people see the port is maintained: - they wait for the maintainer to fix/update the port instead of submitting a patch - they communicate directly with the maintainer - they don't bother at all, because the maintainer won't respond anyway (applies to specific maintainers) -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 10:59:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C13116A41F; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:59:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lupe@lupe-christoph.de) Received: from buexe.b-5.de (buexe.b-5.de [84.19.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C834143D45; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:59:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lupe@lupe-christoph.de) Received: from buexe.b-5.de (www-data@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buexe.b-5.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/b-5/buexe-3.4) with ESMTP id j6TAxTqi012010; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:59:29 +0200 Received: (from www-data@localhost) by buexe.b-5.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/b-5/buexe-msp1.2) id j6TAxTSM012008; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:59:29 +0200 Received: from blueice1n1.de.ibm.com (blueice1n1.de.ibm.com [195.212.29.163]) by buexe.b-5.de (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:59:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1122634769.42ea0c11751e8@buexe.b-5.de> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:59:29 +0200 From: Lupe Christoph To: pav@freebsd.org References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <790a9fff050728142793c7588@mail.gmail.com> <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <1122588979.97751.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <1122588979.97751.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:59:33 -0000 Quoting Pav Lucistnik : > Paul Schmehl pí¹e v èt 28. 07. 2005 v 16:31 -0500: > > Thanks, Scot. That's helpful to know. I wasn't aware, for example, that > > anyone could submit PRs for a broken port. > Please don't do that, unless you also submit a fix. > Because committers are few and usually are not very familiar with the > given broken port. Such PRs tend to be left untouched for years and then > swept under the carpet too often. I see such PRs as useful. At least the save effort for people having the same problem, pointing them to a known deficiency. And they *might* still get fixed. Lupe Christoph -- | lupe@lupe-christoph.de | http://www.lupe-christoph.de/ | | "... putting a mail server on the Internet without filtering is like | | covering yourself with barbecue sauce and breaking into the Charity | | Home for Badgers with Rabies. Michael Lucas | From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 11:05:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED28A16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:05:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0FE43D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:05:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1AEC71F87BF1; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:05:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:05:32 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Mark Linimon , ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050729110532.GD73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Linimon , ports@freebsd.org References: <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729020225.GA28471@soaustin.net> <20050729102158.GA73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050729102158.GA73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:05:34 -0000 # neuhauser@sigpipe.cz / 2005-07-29 12:21:58 +0200: > Marc, this mail is a bit lengthy, but please read it as a portmgr > team member. Ouch, s/Marc/Mark/, I'm sorry to screw up your name. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 11:12:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C623716A425 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:12:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B2943D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:12:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6TBCw6T005849; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:12:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by pav.hide.vol.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6TBCrTw005848; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:12:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pav.hide.vol.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Lupe Christoph In-Reply-To: <1122634769.42ea0c11751e8@buexe.b-5.de> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <790a9fff050728142793c7588@mail.gmail.com> <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <1122588979.97751.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <1122634769.42ea0c11751e8@buexe.b-5.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9DdYuNwvSkzohaFhubZS" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:12:52 +0200 Message-Id: <1122635572.66245.26.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:12:52 -0000 --=-9DdYuNwvSkzohaFhubZS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lupe Christoph p=ED=A8e v p=E1 29. 07. 2005 v 12:59 +0200: > Quoting Pav Lucistnik : > > Paul Schmehl p=ED=B9e v =E8t 28. 07. 2005 v 16:31 -0500: >=20 > > > Thanks, Scot. That's helpful to know. I wasn't aware, for example, = that > > > anyone could submit PRs for a broken port. >=20 > > Please don't do that, unless you also submit a fix. >=20 > > Because committers are few and usually are not very familiar with the > > given broken port. Such PRs tend to be left untouched for years and the= n > > swept under the carpet too often. >=20 > I see such PRs as useful. At least the save effort for people having > the same problem, pointing them to a known deficiency. And they *might* > still get fixed. In theory, yes. In practice, majority of them never see a single followup and all they serve for is to keep GNATS numbers high. We should have a gang of people scouring GNATS, reproducing problems and obtaining more details from submitters and maintainers. We don't have such people now. Whole another deal is if we should be fixing flaws in the software itself, or even adding new features. I'm personally strongly against this - ports should limit itself to package the software properly, nothing more. If someone submit a PR about some FTP server wrongly transcoding cyrillic filenames, what should *we* do about it? That's authors job. --=20 Pav Lucistnik --=-9DdYuNwvSkzohaFhubZS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC6g80ntdYP8FOsoIRAvGgAJwI6sKsKSb/rhU85O7c5ZIw3jvd2gCghy8j o9PuxQyRnQXIHEBEoXR7aAI= =Ey4a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9DdYuNwvSkzohaFhubZS-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 12:03:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E846F16A45B for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:03:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmelo@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: from capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br (vrrp.freebsdbrasil.com.br [200.210.70.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BAD343D49 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:03:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmelo@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: (qmail 49801 invoked by uid 0); 29 Jul 2005 09:03:59 -0300 Received: from jmelo@freebsdbrasil.com.br by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (uvscan: v4.3.20/v4545. spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(201.17.165.147):. Processed in 0.830761 secs); 29 Jul 2005 12:03:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.69.69.2?) (201.17.165.147) by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br with SMTP; 29 Jul 2005 09:03:58 -0300 Message-ID: <42EA1B57.3070008@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:04:39 -0300 From: Jean Milanez Melo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050614) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Attila Nagy References: <20050729002000.16745.qmail@capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br> <42EA0AFC.2070106@fsn.hu> In-Reply-To: <42EA0AFC.2070106@fsn.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update ports: security/pear-Text_Password fixed pkg-plist missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:04:00 -0000 Attila Nagy wrote: > Please feel free to commit this. I no longer use this program, so I'm > glad if somebody can take care of it. > > Thanks, > Oks Attila. I can take it. Any commiter can change the maintainer? -- Atenciosamente Jean Milanez Melo FreeBSD Brasil LTDA. Fone: (31) 3281-9633 http://www.freebsdbrasil.com.br From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 12:04:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFB916A41F; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:04:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bra@fsn.hu) Received: from people.fsn.hu (people.fsn.hu [195.228.252.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B6743D4C; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:04:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bra@fsn.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by people.fsn.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C226184408; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:04:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from people.fsn.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (people.fsn.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 33168-04-3; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:04:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.16.129.72] (japan.t-online.co.hu [195.228.243.99]) by people.fsn.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14EA484425; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:04:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42EA1B60.7080008@fsn.hu> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:04:48 +0200 From: Attila Nagy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050725) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean Milanez Melo References: <20050729002000.16745.qmail@capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br> <42EA0AFC.2070106@fsn.hu> <42EA1B57.3070008@freebsdbrasil.com.br> In-Reply-To: <42EA1B57.3070008@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fsn.hu Cc: ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update ports: security/pear-Text_Password fixed pkg-plist missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:04:59 -0000 Jean Milanez Melo wrote: >> Please feel free to commit this. I no longer use this program, so I'm >> glad if somebody can take care of it. > Oks Attila. I can take it. Any commiter can change the maintainer? Thank you. -- Attila Nagy e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu Adopt a directory on our free software phone @work: +361 371 3536 server! http://www.fsn.hu/?f=brick cell.: +3630 306 6758 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 13:19:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD01E16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:19:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from mail.onlinefix.de (mail2-out.titan-networks.de [217.140.72.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE2943D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:19:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void ([217.140.77.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.onlinefix.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j6TDJcZ5009859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:19:39 +0200 Received: by kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 50F443D0C; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:19:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:19:37 +0200 From: Stefan Walter To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050729131937.GA2167@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z" Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Infinity Approximation Task Force X-PGP-key: http://www.gegenunendlich.de/swalter-rsa.asc X-PGP-fingerprint: 85D8 6A49 22C7 6CD9 B011 5D6A 5691 111B 12B9 E0B3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Patching games/pioneers (repocopy is done) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:19:42 -0000 --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, could someone please commit the patch in ports/83916 before the ports freeze? The repocopy has been done already and the port just needs to be patched and hooked into ports/games/Makefile, but I guess the one-line description of the PR ("Repocopy request...") and its "open" state keeps people from looking at it. It would be nice to have games/gnocatan moved to games/pioneers completely for 6.0-RELEASE. Stefan --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iQGVAwUBQuos6VaRERsSueCzAQIK9gv/eI+XhXCX9rwhq0Xt0R6iYoVkYek6yfur dZtDLr5qVowIQ5v++iSUgZcC5zE51yY4Ti0kMY6D9J8D6Gb9l6IfcvdfPybNFekC sH90JcdSmW6TXaPqt5og4vT9LH3bMm3e3fe6StVNwmPTEr17/ytlhoE99XyTOnSy wJIK3p5b/JGiwe6cdiSb9n+Gqui6xDFKgXRBeJ41k5A+kZwGKz21H/78ErXA+109 UYmFeITgrNSPgYkPsocsiH/A3q3Lmccmzf512KT36edxUmeVeIZUyed3tkEbJh2y zNxb/T9Gy+Fdtm72YuhsUKbwFN0+7kAn1MvwLNXVSPR4iI6gQDDwQuguA/fvp8LQ IS+uf4kFsorTXMyV+R+Zr7oWI9gW1lf3tePCrlWsm+M6i9A80JhhXMw1uIcG+ZQI NyuoqSvsdc5mKsuoxEBxCK2UidIA5eKeEBIpbcI+QIzGUFKvo4x7VPgvkSRBw/V8 6wobzexPSA26qPXq4gNsHnH+9qFmSjNi =V4/C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 13:47:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBFE16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:47:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: from capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br (vrrp.freebsdbrasil.com.br [200.210.70.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2897643D49 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:47:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: (qmail 60733 invoked by uid 0); 29 Jul 2005 10:47:59 -0300 Date: 29 Jul 2005 10:47:59 -0300 Message-ID: <20050729134759.60732.qmail@capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org From: Jean Milanez Melo X-send-pr-version: 3.113 X-GNATS-Notify: Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Update port: cad/slffea fixed size mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jean Milanez Melo List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:47:59 -0000 >Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Jean Milanez Melo >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: Update port: cad/slffea fixed size mismatch >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: ports >Class: update >Release: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #5: Wed Mar 2 15:03:19 BRT 2005 eksffa@capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CAPETA i386 >Description: Fixed size mismatch. Maintainer has been Cc:ed >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: --- slffea.diff begins here --- diff -ruN slffea.old/Makefile slffea/Makefile --- slffea.old/Makefile Thu Jul 28 17:34:25 2005 +++ slffea/Makefile Fri Jul 29 10:23:48 2005 @@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org COMMENT= San Le's Free Finite Element Analysis -BROKEN= Size mismatch -DEPRECATED= "${BROKEN}" -EXPIRATION_DATE=2005-09-22 +#BROKEN= Size mismatch +#DEPRECATED= "${BROKEN}" +#EXPIRATION_DATE=2005-09-22 CONFLICTS= swi-pl-* TenDRA-* USE_REINPLACE= yes diff -ruN slffea.old/distinfo slffea/distinfo --- slffea.old/distinfo Sat Mar 6 08:45:27 2004 +++ slffea/distinfo Fri Jul 29 10:24:59 2005 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -MD5 (slffea13.tgz) = b7958742f200b864c12fe62f4bdf43fd -SIZE (slffea13.tgz) = 1020161 +MD5 (slffea13.tgz) = 7d1112c8b07c39aa5eac8a210d3654ac +SIZE (slffea13.tgz) = 1052067 --- slffea.diff ends here --- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 14:38:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2089516A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:38:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2BE943D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:38:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 4265 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2005 14:38:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 29 Jul 2005 14:38:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 24395 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2005 14:38:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (82.76.1.117) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Jul 2005 14:38:24 -0000 Received: from buh.cameradicommercio.ro (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BEC60A4; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:38:24 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro [192.168.0.10]) by buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:38:24 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2549D; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:38:23 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:38:23 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Jean Milanez Melo Message-ID: <20050729173823.3fc911af@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: <20050729134759.60732.qmail@capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br> References: <20050729134759.60732.qmail@capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: on buh by ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update port: cad/slffea fixed size mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:38:29 -0000 [ dropped gnats from cc ] On 29 Jul 2005 10:47:59 -0300 Jean Milanez Melo wrote: > >Description: > Fixed size mismatch. > > Maintainer has been Cc:ed Thanks for your help, put next time please don't cc ports@ mailing list. If MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org the port has no maintainer. Maybe you're interested to become the maintainer for this port? If so, please submit a follow-up to the PR saying so. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 14:42:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745B116A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:42:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7801A43D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:42:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 5111 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2005 14:42:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 29 Jul 2005 14:42:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 24846 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2005 14:42:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (82.76.1.117) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Jul 2005 14:42:26 -0000 Received: from buh.cameradicommercio.ro (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113AF6186; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:42:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro [192.168.0.10]) by buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:42:26 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2C3A9; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:42:26 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:42:26 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Stas Yakovlev Message-ID: <20050729174226.5af92f7d@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: on buh by ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Suggestion] update net/libnet & net/libnet-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:42:30 -0000 On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:36:39 +0400 Stas Yakovlev wrote: > Hi All. > I think it's time to update net/libnet & net/libnet-devel > > As you know > Existing versions (from developer) > 1.0.2a Deprecated 1.0.x Tree (unsupported) > 1.1.2.1 Latest Stable Version > 1.1.3 Latest Beta Version > > Current status in ports > 1.0.2a net/libnet > 1.1.2.1 net/libnet-devel > > [! Important !] There's no backward compatibility > between Versions 1.0.2a and 1.1.2.1. !!!!!!!!!!!! > > Solution can be: > move net/libnet -> net/libnet10 (this for ports which still depends > on API version 1.0.2a); > copy net/libnet-devel (1.1.2.1) -> net/libnet; > update net/libnet-devel from version 1.1.2.1 to 1.1.3.1. > > Status in ports at the end > 1.0.2a net/libnet10 > 1.1.2.1 net/libnet > 1.1.3 net/libnet-devel > > What do you think about this ? > > P.S: I allready contact with ports@FreeBsd.org ports@FreeBSD.org == freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org == mailing list :) > and mainteiners but without luck(no reply) Most likely both krion@ and shipley are both busy for the moment. Maybe you have the time to send a diff for both ports ? -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:04:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD6816A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:04:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmelo@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: from capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br (vrrp.freebsdbrasil.com.br [200.210.70.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 231E443D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:04:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmelo@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: (qmail 66289 invoked by uid 0); 29 Jul 2005 12:04:56 -0300 Received: from jmelo@freebsdbrasil.com.br by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (uvscan: v4.3.20/v4545. spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(201.17.165.147):. Processed in 0.525603 secs); 29 Jul 2005 15:04:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.69.69.2?) (201.17.165.147) by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br with SMTP; 29 Jul 2005 12:04:56 -0300 Message-ID: <42EA45C8.9020004@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:05:44 -0300 From: Jean Milanez Melo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050614) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu References: <20050729134759.60732.qmail@capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br> <20050729173823.3fc911af@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: <20050729173823.3fc911af@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update port: cad/slffea fixed size mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:04:57 -0000 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >[ dropped gnats from cc ] > >On 29 Jul 2005 10:47:59 -0300 >Jean Milanez Melo wrote: > > > >>>Description: >>> >>> >> Fixed size mismatch. >> >> Maintainer has been Cc:ed >> >> > >Thanks for your help, put next time please don't cc ports@ mailing list. >If MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org the port has no maintainer. > > Oks sorry my mistake. >Maybe you're interested to become the maintainer for this port? > > > Oks no problem, could you change the maintainer to jmelo@freebsdbrasil.com.br? Thanks. -- Atenciosamente Jean Milanez Melo FreeBSD Brasil LTDA. Fone: (31) 3281-9633 http://www.freebsdbrasil.com.br From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:13:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9237E16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:13:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rbgarga@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B8243D5F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:13:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rbgarga@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i21so615990wra for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:13:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n2iMYrWIy/dWgoMI9nWBwG/3RKJQU65rDi2nDL3hE8h7UJtTAoXReuU/K6khti1FZunmq7FKJJfwfEa1RQ5e//krjX2IwdlepvAIEpVs+BDK97X53LT8MwkFiP/R5kU9huGzux5T2ONb2UV00uLp23LS5zfDFFFE2WBmXa4SrjE= Received: by 10.54.37.51 with SMTP id k51mr1190914wrk; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.83.13 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <747dc8f305072908131959559@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:13:14 -0300 From: Renato Botelho To: Jean Milanez Melo In-Reply-To: <42EA1B57.3070008@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050729002000.16745.qmail@capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br> <42EA0AFC.2070106@fsn.hu> <42EA1B57.3070008@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Attila Nagy , FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update ports: security/pear-Text_Password fixed pkg-plist missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Renato Botelho List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:13:19 -0000 On 29/07/05, Jean Milanez Melo wrote: > Attila Nagy wrote: >=20 > > Please feel free to commit this. I no longer use this program, so I'm > > glad if somebody can take care of it. > > > > Thanks, > > >=20 > Oks Attila. I can take it. Any commiter can change the maintainer? done --=20 Renato Botelho ICQ: 54596223 AIM: RBGargaBR From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:18:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EB816A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:18:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3B543D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:18:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j6TFI6NV004013 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:18:09 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (fields.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.11]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j6TFI46P019972; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:18:04 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6EE65128C; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:17:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:17:58 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Edwin Groothuis , ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050729151758.GA48781@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728233334.GF1186@k7.mavetju> <20050729103706.GB73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050729103706.GB73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:18:10 -0000 --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:37:06PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # edwin@mavetju.org / 2005-07-29 09:33:34 +1000: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:41:11PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > Or, I'll accept the fact that my address must appear in MAINTAINER > > > before you accept results of my work, but will ignore any and all > > > PRs coming my way: I don't use the software in question enough to > > > be a good maintainer, so I better don't waste my time. In the > > > meantime, PRs for ports I have been sentenced to "maintain" hang > > > in GNATS, and later the MAINTAINER either gets reset, or the port > > > suffers from perpetual maintainer timeouts. > >=20 > > If you're going to play silly games, expect to be played silly games > > with. > >=20 > > Or in other words, people will start to actively ignore your new > > ports based on their experience with your current ports. >=20 > Yup, and I don't want to do that. > =20 > I can occasionaly spend a week or two working on a port > (http://cvs.sf.net/viewcvs.py/gri/gri/doc/gri.texi?r1=3D1.187&r2=3D1.= 188&diff_format=3Du) > but if I cannot promise to be a good maintainer for it for various > reasons, I shouldn't be forced to. >=20 > Of course, you can tell me to take it or leave it, but is that an > improvement? Roman, I haven't seen you respond to my mail detailing precisely what the policy is and why is in effect. You've only replied to other emails which discuss other interpretations or misunderstandings of the policy, or related concerns. Instead of continuing to do this, perhaps I can direct you to my email? Kris --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFC6kimWry0BWjoQKURAh/mAKD+dQRy7InrD1N4d4YVO0irexk1BwCSA8bv bj989qbvMrI1RxxwfupzvQ== =VGZP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:27:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A4816A420 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:27:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E6043D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:27:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51147388D8F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:27:52 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:27:52 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1AC3A4AE305620CB1D20E64C@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <200507281709.23125.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <8C64A123AF5094DE468F863D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <200507281709.23125.lofi@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Question about maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:27:53 -0000 --On Thursday, July 28, 2005 17:09:19 +0200 Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Thursday, 28. July 2005 16:43, Paul Schmehl wrote: > >> OK. I see that tcl (83,84), itcl, itk and iwidgets are all without >> maintainers. Does that mean the ports are maintained by freebsd folks? >> Or not maintained at all? > > Not maintained at all. This is the charme of tcl/tk at work here, the > black magic that it is makes nobody want to make a commitment to the > stuff. :-) > > In the past, every once in a while somebody has submitted/committed an > update here or there, but nobody ever picked up maintainership. You can > check out who submitted/committed what in FreeBSD's cvsweb. > > However, tcl83/84, itk, itcl and iwidgets are a pretty broad base. You > might want to get a clearer idea first where the problem is located > before you go sending out questions to people. > Well, I *solved* my problem. I used SUB_FILES and SUB_LIST to change the exec line in the script from "exec wish" to "exec tclsh8.4". I'm fiddling around with the iwidgets port now to see if I want to maintain it. Tcl looks a bit too complicated for me right now, but maybe later. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:33:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F8B16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:33:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0867D43D55 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:33:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDF1388CD4 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:33:01 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:33:01 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <813B72121E0B85AAF2AB0809@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050729040834.60781.qmail@web51612.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050729040834.60781.qmail@web51612.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: itcl and iwidgets (was Re: Question about maintainers) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:33:03 -0000 --On Friday, July 29, 2005 06:08:34 +0200 pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: > Hi Paul; > > AFAIK I submitted the last itcl/itk update. One reason why your new port > doesn't work may be because iwidgets hasn't been updated (it's not an easy > task). There is more information on the PR for itcl and in a thread on > -ports, but it all sums up to itcl/itk ports being ill conceived > (hacked). > > After looking at NetBSD's pkgsrc and Darwin ports I got to the conclusion > that we need a new itcl-devel port that grabs the latest bits (containing > both itcl and itk) from the CVS; that way an updated iwidgets port can > find a consistent itcl tree and configure properly. I just never found > the time to fix itcl properly so for the time being I only cleaned some > of the hacks we had been using for years. > They seem to be working fine here. :-) The problem that I had was that the script used wish. I was using SUB_LIST and SUB_FILES to change that to wish8.4, but wish couldn't find iwidgets. After googling some, I changed it to tclsh8.4, and now the script runs fine and the program works. I'll be submitting the port in the near future, after I'm done verifying that every step works as intended. I'm also fiddling with a new iwidgets port now. If I get it working, I'll submit it as well. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:40:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D70816A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:40:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C930643D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:40:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F56388D93 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:40:11 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:40:11 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <523C9B2ACAB77CE81DAA31F9@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <1122635572.66245.26.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <790a9fff050728142793c7588@mail.gmail.com> <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <1122588979.97751.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <1122634769.42ea0c11751e8@buexe.b-5.de> <1122635572.66245.26.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:40:12 -0000 --On Friday, July 29, 2005 13:12:52 +0200 Pav Lucistnik =20 wrote: > Lupe Christoph p=ED=A8e v p=E1 29. 07. 2005 v 12:59 +0200: >> Quoting Pav Lucistnik : >> > Paul Schmehl p=ED=B9e v =E8t 28. 07. 2005 v 16:31 -0500: >> >> > > Thanks, Scot. That's helpful to know. I wasn't aware, for example, >> > > that anyone could submit PRs for a broken port. >> >> > Please don't do that, unless you also submit a fix. >> >> > Because committers are few and usually are not very familiar with the >> > given broken port. Such PRs tend to be left untouched for years and >> > then swept under the carpet too often. >> >> I see such PRs as useful. At least the save effort for people having >> the same problem, pointing them to a known deficiency. And they *might* >> still get fixed. > > In theory, yes. > > In practice, majority of them never see a single followup and all they > serve for is to keep GNATS numbers high. > How about this? Write a script that parses the submit dates. After an agreed upon amount=20 of time with no action (6 months? A year?) the PR gets automatically nuked = and the original submitter gets an email message - Dear John, we're sorry,=20 but nothing was done to correct the problem you submitted in prxxxxx.=20 (Copy of the original PR attached.) If this problem remains unresolved and = needs to be resolved, please resubmit under a new PR. That would at least put the onus on the PR submitter to followup on the=20 original submission, and, I would think, eliminate "non-serious"=20 submissions eventually. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:45:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD5F16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:45:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eighner@io.com) Received: from smtp.io.com (smtp.io.com [209.198.128.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF04143D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:45:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eighner@io.com) Received: from io.com (206-224-83-182-dialup.io.com [206.224.83.182]) by smtp.io.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id j6TFjs1I002365 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:45:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from eighner@io.com) Received: by io.com (nbSMTP-0.98) for uid 1001 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:43:53 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:43:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Lars Eighner To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20050729101650.O75776@goodwill.io.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.86.2, clamav-milter version 0.86 on smtp.io.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Nanoblogger 3.2.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:45:57 -0000 I may be crazy, but it seems to me that www/nanoblogger (3.2.3) is broken in the calendar plugin, in that it fails to format the last week of a month properly when the last week contains fewer than seven days. It correctly treats a short first week, by placing empty cells in the calendar table in front of the dates, but it does the same thing for the last week, in which case the empty cells should come after the dates. It seems to do this for every combination of sed/gsed and cal/gcal. I grossly hacked until it seems to work with sed and cal, but I had to use some perl one-liners because my sed abilities are very limited (like non-existant). Has anyone else experienced similar problems with this port? My uname -a FreeBSD goodwill.io.com 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE\ #0: Mon Jun 6 01:46:37 CDT 2005 \ toor@goodwill.io.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JUNE05 i386 -- Lars Eighner eighner@io.com http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 16:44:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2D716A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:44:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from tinker.exit.com (tinker.exit.com [206.223.0.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5B843D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:44:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from [206.223.0.5] (realtime [206.223.0.5]) by tinker.exit.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6TGi3iZ067604; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:44:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Message-ID: <42EA5CD3.7030804@exit.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:44:03 -0700 From: Frank Mayhar User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050728) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <790a9fff050728142793c7588@mail.gmail.com> <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.1/997/Fri Jul 29 01:07:29 2005 on tinker.exit.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:44:04 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > Thanks, Scot. That's helpful to know. I wasn't aware, for example, > that anyone could submit PRs for a broken port. %-/ Okay, there's where you and I parted company. That was my basic, (mostly) unstated assumption. This is why you and I were arguing at cross purposes. -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 16:55:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E7416A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:55:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web51603.mail.yahoo.com (web51603.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D738A43D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:55:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 9638 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jul 2005 16:55:51 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=h+gaUFdHRTjOt+zz6u6nHGOlKCZSXoVcVROOPyExjhCEU5cVkF5smnjMvUHd/LlDcq25g+S1E1TXSWwC/CqBOmDVnodGP1ecW2xpeoIHJ6J96r+Up+OoubNW/A++H85vd/8NiZTyAAMZxqbTK1M6ERj0+Vl03HZ/suqt8kD4364= ; Message-ID: <20050729165551.9636.qmail@web51603.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [208.30.41.90] by web51603.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:55:51 CEST Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:55:51 +0200 (CEST) From: To: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: itcl and iwidgets (was Re: Question about maintainers) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:55:53 -0000 Hi again; I'm glad the hacks work for you :-). As you pointed out, itcl seems to work well with Tcl/Tk 8.4, (we still build it with Tcl/Tk 8.3 because I didn't feel confident testing it). Hmm... some hacking into the configure script might also work for the latest iwidgets... not that I'm volunteering. Perhaps I should mention though ... the iwidgets port doesn't compress the manpages due to some namespace conflict with Tcl/Tk that are now solved in the latest iwidgets version. cheers, Pedro. ___________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo http://it.beta.messenger.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 17:12:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1201016A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:12:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (xbsd.org [82.233.2.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4B543D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:12:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAEB1184B; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:16:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53830-01; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:16:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.42.7] (amnesia.xbsd.org [192.168.42.7]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9463411497; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:16:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42EA636A.9030108@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:12:10 +0200 From: Florent Thoumie User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars Eighner References: <20050729101650.O75776@goodwill.io.com> In-Reply-To: <20050729101650.O75776@goodwill.io.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig599F823F3CA83F117C4AC753" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Nanoblogger 3.2.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:12:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig599F823F3CA83F117C4AC753 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lars Eighner wrote: > I may be crazy, but it seems to me that www/nanoblogger (3.2.3) > is broken in the calendar plugin, in that it fails to format > the last week of a month properly when the last week contains > fewer than seven days. It correctly treats a short first week, > by placing empty cells in the calendar table in front of the > dates, but it does the same thing for the last week, in which > case the empty cells should come after the dates. > > It seems to do this for every combination of sed/gsed and > cal/gcal. > > I grossly hacked until it seems to work with sed and cal, but I > had to use some perl one-liners because my sed abilities are > very limited (like non-existant). > > Has anyone else experienced similar problems with this port? I'm not using it anymore but this looks like a software bug, please contact the upstream developer of nanoblogger. He usually answers quite fast. -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --------------enig599F823F3CA83F117C4AC753 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC6mNvMxEkbVFH3PQRAgN1AJ4wIN6pLVeaFhCiSuUJ8bWQuYdpqACfW2AA qVAIg9lRJLeYUsUeA+AT36M= =Owea -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig599F823F3CA83F117C4AC753-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 18:07:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B50816A41F; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:07:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9118F43D48; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:07:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-24-6-134-233.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.134.233]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20050729180706012006c06re>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:07:07 +0000 Message-ID: <42EA7048.7050006@bfoz.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:07:04 -0700 From: Brandon Fosdick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org, olgeni@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Eterm transparency/shading problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:07:10 -0000 I just cvsup'd ports the other day and rebuilt Eterm, now the transparency/shading option tints everything blue, regardless of the actual settings. Previously I had "cmod 160" and it made the background about %50 shaded, as expected. Any idea what happened, or how to fix this? Apparently I'm not the only one with this problem, but I don't see any responses. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-February/078221.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 19:43:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F9516A41F; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:43:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from jupiter.efacilitas.de (85-10-196-108.clients.your-server.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8EF43D53; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:42:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by jupiter.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE9DC3ECE7; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44ED912B1C5; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:42:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93059-07; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:42:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBB212B02A; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:42:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42EA8696.8020307@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:42:14 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brandon Fosdick References: <42EA7048.7050006@bfoz.net> In-Reply-To: <42EA7048.7050006@bfoz.net> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010409080805070804080301" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, olgeni@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eterm transparency/shading problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:43:03 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010409080805070804080301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Brandon Fosdick wrote: > I just cvsup'd ports the other day and rebuilt Eterm, now the > transparency/shading option tints everything blue, regardless of the > actual settings. Previously I had "cmod 160" and it made the background > about %50 shaded, as expected. Any idea what happened, or how to fix this? > > Apparently I'm not the only one with this problem, but I don't see any > responses. > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-February/078221.html This is a bug in Eterm and it has been fixed in the upcoming next release of Eterm. To solve this problem now you either need to compile it with MMX support, e.g. make -DWITH_MMX install clean or in case your machine has no support for MMX put the quick patch that I attached to this mail into /usr/ports/x11/eterm/files/ and build Eterm as usual. Regards Björn --------------010409080805070804080301-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 19:53:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D49016A41F; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:53:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B493943D46; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:53:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-24-6-134-233.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.134.233]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20050729195331012006ckpne>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:53:31 +0000 Message-ID: <42EA8939.107@bfoz.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:53:29 -0700 From: Brandon Fosdick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= References: <42EA7048.7050006@bfoz.net> <42EA8696.8020307@cs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <42EA8696.8020307@cs.tu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, olgeni@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eterm transparency/shading problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:53:33 -0000 Ah, that makes sense. I usually compile Eterm with MMX enabled but somehow forgot this time. Now it looks much better. Would it be worthwhile to make this compile option part of that new(?) options framework that some of the ports seem to be using? Thanks for the reply. Björn König wrote: > Brandon Fosdick wrote: > >> I just cvsup'd ports the other day and rebuilt Eterm, now the >> transparency/shading option tints everything blue, regardless of the >> actual settings. Previously I had "cmod 160" and it made the >> background about %50 shaded, as expected. Any idea what happened, or >> how to fix this? >> >> Apparently I'm not the only one with this problem, but I don't see any >> responses. >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-February/078221.html > > > > This is a bug in Eterm and it has been fixed in the upcoming next > release of Eterm. > > To solve this problem now you either need to compile it with MMX > support, e.g. > > make -DWITH_MMX install clean > > or in case your machine has no support for MMX put the quick patch that > I attached to this mail into /usr/ports/x11/eterm/files/ and build Eterm > as usual. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 19:57:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A971316A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:57:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from jupiter.efacilitas.de (85-10-196-108.clients.your-server.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B6643D55 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:57:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by jupiter.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA17C3DE74 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06CE12B1C4 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:56:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29721-03 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:56:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BE112B1CA for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:56:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42EA89EF.8050408@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:56:31 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org References: <42EA7048.7050006@bfoz.net> <42EA8696.8020307@cs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <42EA8696.8020307@cs.tu-berlin.de> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060207030702090401090903" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Eterm transparency/shading problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:57:06 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060207030702090401090903 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --------------060207030702090401090903-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 20:05:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E7616A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:05:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from tinker.exit.com (tinker.exit.com [206.223.0.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6650E43D48 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:05:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from [206.223.0.5] (realtime [206.223.0.5]) by tinker.exit.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6TK5V22077043; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:05:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Message-ID: <42EA8C0B.2040000@exit.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:05:31 -0700 From: Frank Mayhar User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050728) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Neuhauser References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050729105904.GC73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050729105904.GC73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.1/997/Fri Jul 29 01:07:29 2005 on tinker.exit.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:05:33 -0000 Roman Neuhauser wrote: > When people see the port is maintained: > > - they wait for the maintainer to fix/update the port instead of > submitting a patch > - they communicate directly with the maintainer > - they don't bother at all, because the maintainer won't respond > anyway (applies to specific maintainers) Or alternatively, and speaking strictly for myself, send-pr a patch with a CC to the maintainer. If the maintainer never responds, the patch may well be committed and in any case it's tracked in the PR database. Someone someday may pick it up and use it if they need it. If the port is unmaintained, of course, I still send-pr the patch and I rarely if ever take over the port, simply because I don't have time to maintain more than the couple I already have. Of course, I consider none of this to be some kind of personal affront. Things are as they are, some ports are unmaintained and some maintainers never respond. That's just the way it is, but it _doesn't_ mean that FreeBSD should start accepting unmaintained ports. (If that's not what you're arguing, fine, but it certainly _seems_ to be, else I don't understand where the disagreement comes from). (Oh, and the "bullshit" I called was with respect to your [Roman] assertion that the "policy makers" won and everyone else lost. That's a gross oversimplification and is untrue to boot. I stand by what I wrote.) -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 20:33:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7C116A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:33:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D74143D6E for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:33:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 42BEA29ED; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:33:24 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:33:24 -0500 To: Mark Linimon , ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050729203324.GA19476@soaustin.net> References: <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729020225.GA28471@soaustin.net> <20050729102158.GA73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050729102158.GA73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:33:25 -0000 On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:21:58PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com / 2005-03-22 15:57:42 -0500: > > Roman, why would not you be the maintainer? > > Ok, sign me up. > > /me sighs > > I had had a reply written saying that I'd simply be a very bad > maintainer for the port (for the above mentioned reasons), but the > thought of the ping pong ("why not?", "c'mon, you can do it!", etc > [hyperbole, but that's what you guys do, and it's not pleasant]) > wasn't too attractive, so I bowed. Then it looks to me like you made a mistake by so doing. If you didn't want your arm to be twisted, you should have said so then. > So, what do we have here? Am I the maintainer? What does that > actually mean anyway? My view is that if someone says they'll maintain a port, then they shouldn't be surprised if people look to them to update it, fix it if it breaks, and answer questions from users. If they don't want to do any of that, that's ok, but they shouldn't volunteer to be the maintainer. > because I don't see a practical difference besides the value of > MAINTAINER If the maintainer is inactive, there isn't one. But we want to encourage more people to be active maintainers. > You know, talking to you as the portmgr team member, you do have > a problem with port maintainership handling, but it's a different > one from "too many ports@FreeBSD.org ports". Most ports with maintainers are in better shape than the ports without maintainers. I can't demonstrate this statistically at this time but the last time I generated hacky statistics it was certainly the case. The fact that we have a number of maintainers who are inactive is a problem but it's not the same problem. > Ying-Chieh's patch nicely brings forth the other side of the story: > he/she hadn't created the port him-/herself, but updating it to a > newer version was easy enough. And it's great when that happens, but since the number of unmaintained ports is growing far faster than the number of maintainers and committers, the number of ports where this isn't happening is going to grow. > From where I'm standing, bringing the port in (even "unmaintained") > looks like a win. Then we're going to have to agree to disagree. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 20:47:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D7716A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:47:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D753643D46 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:47:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 70C6229A5; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:47:40 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:47:40 -0500 To: Mark Linimon , ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050729204740.GB19476@soaustin.net> References: <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050729105904.GC73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050729105904.GC73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:47:41 -0000 On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:59:04PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > I no longer have the statistics online but from the last time I went > > through this it is about twice more likely that an unmaintained port: > > > > - has PRs against it > > - is broken > > - is out-of-date > > I cannot dispute the latter two, but have you included these in your > calculations? > > When people see the port is maintained: > > - they communicate directly with the maintainer That's the preferred way. > - they wait for the maintainer to fix/update the port instead of > submitting a patch This isn't effective. > - they don't bother at all, because the maintainer won't respond > anyway (applies to specific maintainers) That's why we have the 2-week timeout and why we reset inactive maintainers. But if people are not sending patches in these cases, we'll never know when this is happening, will we? If people can't grow thick enough skins to send PRs and try to get them in even if it's via maintainer timeouts, we're going to degenerate to a situation where everyone is sitting around waiting for that mythical Someone Else to do something, and the ports will just continue to rot. I mean, what's the alternative you're proposing? Just give up on the idea of maintainership entirely because there's some number of people who aren't doing anything? We already encourage people who have lost interest in their ports (no longer using them, press of real life, whatever reason) to go ahead and drop them. There remain the cases where the maintainer is no longer even at that email address, and we reap those email addresses when they bounce. (Every time someone has tried to push for sending periodic email to maintainers, either to ask "are you still interested" or "here are the latest commits to your ports", there have been strong objections.) On occasion I've reset maintainerships myself due to the 3-month inactivity period. On the last two of those, other people immediately picked up several of those ports and updated them. Other than this, what is your alternative? mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 20:57:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B0916A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:57:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3903143D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:57:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id CE4A729D7; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:57:14 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:57:14 -0500 To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20050729205714.GC19476@soaustin.net> References: <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <790a9fff050728142793c7588@mail.gmail.com> <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <1122588979.97751.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <1122634769.42ea0c11751e8@buexe.b-5.de> <1122635572.66245.26.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <523C9B2ACAB77CE81DAA31F9@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <523C9B2ACAB77CE81DAA31F9@utd59514.utdallas.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:57:15 -0000 On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:40:11AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Write a script that parses the submit dates. After an agreed upon amount > of time with no action (6 months? A year?) the PR gets automatically nuked > and the original submitter gets an email message - Dear John, we're sorry, > but nothing was done to correct the problem you submitted in prxxxxx. > (Copy of the original PR attached.) If this problem remains unresolved and > needs to be resolved, please resubmit under a new PR. My experience with closing the stale kern/ PRs is that submitters really hate it when we do this. The thing I try to encourage people to do is set PRs to feedback and ask "is this still a problem?" If yes, change it to either open (if there is something like a patch or suggested solution) or suspended (no solution is known.) (Of course, if there is no response after some time, it can be closed with a "feedback timeout".) Submitters really don't want to hear that we just gave up on a problem that they obviously took the time to write us about. The impression they get from something like this is "FreeBSD doesn't care, I'll just go elsewhere." I have plenty of experience trying to close old, stale, PRs to back up this assertion. (There is also the problem of "some agreed-upon time". As you are no doubt learning, getting that "agreed-upon" part down is where the majority of these ideas fall apart. I have uncommitted patches to the PR handling guidelines about this; uncommitted because I couldn't get a consensus about it.) mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 21:10:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5019816A41F; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:10:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA8643D45; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:10:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 6FCB729EF; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:10:11 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:10:11 -0500 To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20050729211011.GE19476@soaustin.net> References: <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <790a9fff050728142793c7588@mail.gmail.com> <47ECFCB8BE498CEAB57757D7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <1122588979.97751.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <1122634769.42ea0c11751e8@buexe.b-5.de> <1122635572.66245.26.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1122635572.66245.26.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Paul Schmehl , Lupe Christoph Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:10:12 -0000 On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:12:52PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > I see such PRs as useful. At least the save effort for people having > > the same problem, pointing them to a known deficiency. And they *might* > > still get fixed. > > In theory, yes. > > In practice, majority of them never see a single followup and all they > serve for is to keep GNATS numbers high. While I think I can claim to have done as much work as most people on trying to get the GNATS numbers down, I don't think we should close PRs that are pointing out still-existing problems just because they're old just to get the numbers down. That's what, IMHO, the "suspended" state is for, if you look at the documentation ("problem is known but no one is working on this.") > We should have a gang of people scouring GNATS, reproducing problems and > obtaining more details from submitters and maintainers. We don't have > such people now. We do have certain dedicated people that do exactly that, and they rarely get thanked (thank you folks, you know who you are!) But certainly we could always use more. > Whole another deal is if we should be fixing flaws in the software > itself, or even adding new features. Nope. The Ports Collection should be a framework for installing someone's else's software on FreeBSD. PRs about new features, or bugs in the softwanre itself, need to be closed and the submitter referred to the author(s). IIRC the PR Submission Guidelines state this. PRs should be about something not working _on FreeBSD specifically_. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 22:02:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABE816A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:02:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF5743D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BF4451F87BEF; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:01:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:01:59 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20050729220159.GA79524@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Linimon , ports@freebsd.org References: <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729020225.GA28471@soaustin.net> <20050729102158.GA73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729203324.GA19476@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050729203324.GA19476@soaustin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:02:01 -0000 # linimon@lonesome.com / 2005-07-29 15:33:24 -0500: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:21:58PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > From where I'm standing, bringing the port in (even "unmaintained") > > looks like a win. > > Then we're going to have to agree to disagree. Aye aye, sir, it was my pleasure. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 22:57:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A7116A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:57:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jowens@ghiapet.homeip.net) Received: from ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.166.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991B043D45 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:57:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jowens@ghiapet.homeip.net) Received: from mycroft.ghiapet.net (CPE-69-76-111-42.wi.res.rr.com [69.76.111.42]) by ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j6TMvVZ7013531 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:57:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.0.201] (mycroft.ghiapet.net [192.168.0.201] (may be forged)) by mycroft.ghiapet.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6TMvS8Y003364; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:57:29 -0500 Message-ID: <42EAB453.9010503@ghiapet.homeip.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:57:23 -0500 From: "John R. Owens" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 OpenPGP: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7FCE510003C4E56B069E262A" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: make apache2 not making mod_cgi X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:57:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7FCE510003C4E56B069E262A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit First asked over in FreeBSD-Stable, until I realized that was the wrong place for it. I'm new to FreeBSD and ports, and don't know make well yet, so this could just be something I messed up on my own, redoing the ports tree and all. But the first couple of times I remade apache2, I got a mod_cgi.so installed. Now, the past couple of times I've remade it (perhaps since Wednesday or so?), it's making all the modules I want except mod_cgi. I've cvsup'ed a couple of times since then, and I've got WITH_MISC_MODULES=yes, but in config.log I find this: $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-layout=FreeBSD --with-perl=/usr/local/bin/perl5.8.7 --with-port=80 --with-expat=/usr/local --with-iconv=/usr/local --libdir=/usr/local/lib/apache2 --includedir=/usr/local/include/apache2 --enable-v4-mapped --enable-mods-shared=access auth auth_anon auth_dbm auth_digest dav dav_fs ldap auth_ldap actions alias asis autoindex cache cern_meta charset_lite deflate dir disk_cache env expires file_cache headers imap include info log_config logio mime mime_magic negotiation rewrite setenvif speling status unique_id userdir usertrack vhost_alias proxy proxy_connect proxy_ftp proxy_http ssl suexec cgid suexec --with-mpm=worker i386-portbld-freebsd5.4 --prefix=/usr/local i386-portbld-freebsd5.4 Note that in --enable-mods-shared, the rest of the MISC category is included, except cgi. I also find these lines in Makefile.modules that might be relevant (since I'm not familiar with make syntax, I'm not sure under what conditions these lines will be active): WITHOUT_MODULES+= cgi ... MISC_MODULES= actions alias asis autoindex cache cern_meta \ cgi charset_lite deflate dir disk_cache env expires \ file_cache headers imap include info log_config logio mime \ mime_magic negotiation rewrite setenvif speling status \ unique_id userdir usertrack vhost_alias So, if it's not actually broken in the port, how do I fix it so it installs mod_cgi on my system? Even if it is just a dirty hack to inject the option into a Makefile or configure. If it's broken in the port, of course, that should probably be fixed! I ran make in script, and found this amongst the output: ... checking whether to enable mod_suexec... checking dependencies checking whether to enable mod_suexec... shared checking whether to enable mod_cgid... shared checking whether to enable mod_cgi... no checking for pthread_kill... no checking whether to enable mod_dav_fs... shared checking whether to enable mod_vhost_alias... shared .... but I suppose that should be fairly evident from the config.log. Since the time I posted this to the stable list, I've done make rmconfig, make clean, and when that didn't cut it, I did (in order) rm -rf /usr/ports/*, sysinstall, cvsup ports-supfile, portmanager -u, make deinstall/reinstall, just to be on the safe side. I still get no mod_cgi when including WITH_MISC_MODULES. -- John R. Owens ProofReading Markup Language: http://prml.sourceforge.net/ --------------enig7FCE510003C4E56B069E262A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC6rRYi0+Id/zGcbARAsukAKCFtcIhfupUnE7sAxZTFZwx33qc1QCdFlsF cQ9I+zrRJaD8DtdOI6IKGr8= =AWGs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7FCE510003C4E56B069E262A-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 00:11:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BA216A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:11:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D4943D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:11:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.101] (adsl-66-141-177-118.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [66.141.177.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F763FC39 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:11:19 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:10:59 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Fixing up man pages X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:11:25 -0000 I'm working on updating the x11-toolkits/iwidgets port, and I've run into a problem. The man pages install fine, but they aren't formatted correctly. In the Makefile for the source, there is a section that deals with the man pages like this: @cd $(TOP_DIR)/doc; for i in *.n; \ do \ rm -f $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename $$i`; \ rm -f $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename iwidgets_$$i`; \ sed -e '/man\.macros/r man.macros' -e '/man\.macros/d' \ $$i > $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename iwidgets_$$i`; \ chmod 444 $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename iwidgets_$$i`; \ done; How can I incorporate this into the port Makefile so that the man pages will be properly formatted? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 01:00:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F4616A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:00:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yoichi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from alcoholic.geiin.org (usen-59x87x89x234.ap-US02.usen.ad.jp [59.87.89.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F1743D5C for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:00:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yoichi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost.geiin.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alcoholic.geiin.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E4215D23D; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:00:31 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:00:30 +0900 Message-ID: <871x5hcdld.wl%yoichi@FreeBSD.org> From: Yoichi Nakayama To: Kirill Ponomarew In-Reply-To: <20050729113036.GH88451@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <20050729113036.GH88451@voodoo.oberon.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.1 (Almost Unreal) EMIKO/1.14.1 (Choanoflagellata) IMITATION/1.14.6 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCMGxIVjpxJGobKEI=?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) Organization: Geiin.org X-Face: wLZki+KbGjgKe0,<&3g*rA|R**vj[a8L%[v]ecJh1L(Uqm|LBx; v7Nq7n%?0d.aS]F#[~C\!{m?m,C&#U5}$_pZvBR>5VmX1Ol0`P\M-U8`sUF<5Quj'z&zzW8r|Zl9#W7Wut3duYzpKrP{n+AbarKtJ!i"Al7]P; -?[=iBZa*]r=>C':0~JECx]IH+RXq=/hUX}MB9e]oQKBxsDd/ MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.14.1 - "Choanoflagellata") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [ports-i386@FreeBSD.org: ja-jisx0213-fonts-1.06 failed on i386 6] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:00:41 -0000 Distfiles are updated, so they should be fetched from master site rather than ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. At Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:30:36 +0200, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > > FYI; can you please investigate and/or report to the developers? If > you are already aware of this problem but do not yet have a fix, > please mark the port BROKEN in the appropriate case, so that users > do not unexpectedly encounter it. > > See http://pointyhat.freebsd.org for the full log. > > Thanks. > > ----- Forwarded message from User Ports-i386 ----- > > Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:22:58 GMT > From: User Ports-i386 > To: krion@FreeBSD.org, kris@FreeBSD.org > Subject: ja-jisx0213-fonts-1.06 failed on i386 6 > > building ja-jisx0213-fonts-1.06 on gohan21.freebsd.org > in directory /x/tmp/6/chroot/1443 > maintained by: yoichi@FreeBSD.org > port directory: /usr/ports/japanese/jisx0213-fonts > build started at Fri Jul 29 11:22:47 UTC 2005 > FETCH_DEPENDS= > PATCH_DEPENDS= > EXTRACT_DEPENDS= > BUILD_DEPENDS=expat-1.95.8_3.tbz fontconfig-2.2.3,1.tbz freetype2-2.1.10.tbz libXft-2.1.7.tbz mkbold-mkitalic-0.09.tbz pkgconfig-0.17.2.tbz png-1.2.8_2.tbz xorg-clients-6.8.2.tbz xorg-libraries-6.8.2.tbz xterm-203.tbz > RUN_DEPENDS=expat-1.95.8_3.tbz fontconfig-2.2.3,1.tbz freetype2-2.1.10.tbz libXft-2.1.7.tbz pkgconfig-0.17.2.tbz png-1.2.8_2.tbz xorg-clients-6.8.2.tbz xorg-libraries-6.8.2.tbz xterm-203.tbz > add_pkg > ================================================================ > ======================================== > => jiskan16-2000-1.bdf.gz doesn't seem to exist in /tmp/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > jiskan16-2000-1.bdf.gz 296 kB 1729 kBps > => jiskan16-2000-2.bdf.gz doesn't seem to exist in /tmp/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > jiskan16-2000-2.bdf.gz 89 kB 1507 kBps > => K14-1.bdf.gz doesn't seem to exist in /tmp/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > K14-1.bdf.gz 249 kB 1751 kBps > => K14-2.bdf.gz doesn't seem to exist in /tmp/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > K14-2.bdf.gz 73 kB 1419 kBps > => K12-1.bdf.gz doesn't seem to exist in /tmp/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > K12-1.bdf.gz 207 kB 1251 kBps > => K12-2.bdf.gz doesn't seem to exist in /tmp/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > K12-2.bdf.gz 62 kB 877 kBps > => jiskan24-2000-1.bdf.gz doesn't seem to exist in /tmp/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > jiskan24-2000-1.bdf.gz 504 kB 528 kBps > => jiskan24-2000-2.bdf.gz doesn't seem to exist in /tmp/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > jiskan24-2000-2.bdf.gz 152 kB 977 kBps > => Checksum OK for jiskan16-2000-1.bdf.gz. > => Checksum mismatch for jiskan16-2000-2.bdf.gz. > => Checksum OK for K14-1.bdf.gz. > => Checksum OK for K14-2.bdf.gz. > => Checksum OK for K12-1.bdf.gz. > => Checksum OK for K12-2.bdf.gz. > => Checksum OK for jiskan24-2000-1.bdf.gz. > => Checksum OK for jiskan24-2000-2.bdf.gz. > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: jiskan16-2000-2.bdf.gz > => jiskan16-2000-2.bdf.gz doesn't seem to exist in /tmp/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp-master.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > => Checksum OK for jiskan16-2000-1.bdf.gz. > => Checksum mismatch for jiskan16-2000-2.bdf.gz. > => Checksum OK for K14-1.bdf.gz. > => Checksum OK for K14-2.bdf.gz. > => Checksum OK for K12-1.bdf.gz. > => Checksum OK for K12-2.bdf.gz. > => Checksum OK for jiskan24-2000-1.bdf.gz. > => Checksum OK for jiskan24-2000-2.bdf.gz. > ===> Giving up on fetching files: jiskan16-2000-2.bdf.gz > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/a/ports/japanese/jisx0213-fonts/distinfo) > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /a/ports/japanese/jisx0213-fonts. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /a/ports/japanese/jisx0213-fonts. > ================================================================ > build ended at Fri Jul 29 11:22:55 UTC 2005 > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -Kirill > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 06:05:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE6616A423 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:05:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stas.yakovlev@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B0343D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:05:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stas.yakovlev@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so1026851rne for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:05:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dO52zW2lBMCxX1GdRlGNBp8BXy4l5cuHxB1Y/DlUTSe2RSLZyYNWtjRbC+iUI/jepDo/ZVv5RMNStcY/TAb62tAIZLcVV1Av0r1lmu58JUEdWf3HdM8WqhjXrAHKlXzkdZ5NOvt+T6Hg+lKIW8TKs+lF+uc1diybJMCZyLB2dkE= Received: by 10.39.2.68 with SMTP id e68mr1890134rni; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.208.42 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:05:31 +0400 From: Stas Yakovlev To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu In-Reply-To: <20050729174226.5af92f7d@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050729174226.5af92f7d@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Suggestion] update net/libnet & net/libnet-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stas Yakovlev List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:05:32 -0000 On 29/07/05, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:36:39 +0400 > Stas Yakovlev wrote: >=20 > > Hi All. > > I think it's time to update net/libnet & net/libnet-devel ....... > Most likely both krion@ and shipley are both busy for the moment. >=20 > Maybe you have the time to send a diff for both ports ? Ok I already done it. Whom should I send it ? Stanislav. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 07:33:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC2416A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:33:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76D9843D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:33:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 20811 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2005 07:33:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 30 Jul 2005 07:33:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 27566 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2005 07:33:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (82.76.1.117) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Jul 2005 07:33:43 -0000 Received: from buh.cameradicommercio.ro (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9886186 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:33:43 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro [192.168.0.10]) by buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:33:43 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122D230 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:33:43 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:33:42 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050730103342.32994fe6@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: <42EA45C8.9020004@freebsdbrasil.com.br> References: <20050729134759.60732.qmail@capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br> <20050729173823.3fc911af@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> <42EA45C8.9020004@freebsdbrasil.com.br> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: on buh by ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Update port: cad/slffea fixed size mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:33:49 -0000 On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:05:44 -0300 Jean Milanez Melo wrote: > Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > >[ dropped gnats from cc ] > > > >On 29 Jul 2005 10:47:59 -0300 > >Jean Milanez Melo wrote: > > > > > > > >>>Description: > >>> > >>> > >> Fixed size mismatch. > >> > >> Maintainer has been Cc:ed > >> > >> > > > >Thanks for your help, put next time please don't cc ports@ mailing > >list. If MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org the port has no > >maintainer. > > > > > > Oks sorry my mistake. > > >Maybe you're interested to become the maintainer for this port? > > > > > > > > Oks no problem, could you change the maintainer to > jmelo@freebsdbrasil.com.br? As I've said, do a follow-up to your PR: replay to the mail you received as a response to your PR and say that you would like to become the maintainer. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 08:07:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8598416A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:07:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 875C143D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:07:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 27859 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2005 08:07:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 30 Jul 2005 08:07:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 30597 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2005 08:07:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (82.76.1.117) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Jul 2005 08:07:30 -0000 Received: from buh.cameradicommercio.ro (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947A6609C; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:07:30 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro [192.168.0.10]) by buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:07:30 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD9330; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:07:30 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:07:29 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Stas Yakovlev Message-ID: <20050730110729.0f5a2d21@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: References: <20050729174226.5af92f7d@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: on buh by ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Suggestion] update net/libnet & net/libnet-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:07:34 -0000 On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:05:31 +0400 Stas Yakovlev wrote: > On 29/07/05, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:36:39 +0400 > > Stas Yakovlev wrote: > > > > > Hi All. > > > I think it's time to update net/libnet & net/libnet-devel > ....... > > Most likely both krion@ and shipley are both busy for the moment. > > > > Maybe you have the time to send a diff for both ports ? > Ok I already done it. > Whom should I send it ? Normally to the maintainers and if not getting any replay for 1-2 weeks send-pr. But since tomorrow we'll be entering the freeze for upcoming FreeBSD 6 release it's a good idea to send-pr(1) so the changes don't get lost; please CC the two maintainers since GNATS doesn't announce maintainers when a PR for their ports is filled. ( See: /usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/index.html and please test your modified ports before submitting - see: /usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing.html sysutils/gtk-send-pr) --------> Please note that I'm not familiar with this ports and I assume versions numbers and the other details taken from your mail are correct. <---------- You should send 3 PR, in all: - include the description from the mail which started this thread in all PRs in the Description field; also explain the respective steps needed in this field - Severity: non-critical - Priority: low - Category: ports - Class: change-request The first PR: Synopsis: [repocopy] net/libnet -> net/libnet10 - add the patch for updating all the ports that currently depend ({RUN_ | BUILD_ | LIB_}DEPENDS) on net/libnet to make them depend on the new port. The second PR: Synopsis: [PATCH] net/libnet: Update to 1.1.2.1 - add the patch for the update to 1.1.2.1 - note that the update should be committed after committing the first PR (you will have its number, that's why you should submit that PR first) else depending ports will be broken - add the patch for updating all the ports that currently depend ({RUN_ | BUILD_ | LIB_}DEPENDS) on net/libnet to make them depend on net/libnet The third PR: Synopsis: [PATCH] net/libnet-devel: Update to 1.1.3 - add the patch for the update to 1.1.3 - note that the patch should be committed after committing the other 2 PRs Thanks for your help, -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 09:26:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E0C16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:26:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A768843D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:26:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E3F431F87BEF; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:26:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:26:05 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20050730092605.GB79432@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Schmehl , ports@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fixing up man pages X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:26:09 -0000 # pauls@utdallas.edu / 2005-07-29 19:10:59 -0500: > I'm working on updating the x11-toolkits/iwidgets port, and I've run into a > problem. The man pages install fine, but they aren't formatted correctly. What does "formatted correctly" mean? Can you paste the output, and what you want it to look like instead? > In the Makefile for the source, there is a section that deals with the man > pages like this: > > @cd $(TOP_DIR)/doc; for i in *.n; \ > do \ > rm -f $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename $$i`; \ > rm -f $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename iwidgets_$$i`; \ > sed -e '/man\.macros/r man.macros' -e '/man\.macros/d' \ > $$i > $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename iwidgets_$$i`; \ > chmod 444 $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename iwidgets_$$i`; \ > done; > > How can I incorporate this into the port Makefile so that the man pages > will be properly formatted? The only "formatting" this does is replace the first occurrence of "man.macros" on any line with the contents of $(TOP_DIR)/doc/man.macros. Is that's what you mean? -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 09:45:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E8416A41F; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:45:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aleko@sitel.com.ua) Received: from relay2.sitel.com.ua (houp.sitel.com.ua [217.27.144.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EDA43D46; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:45:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aleko@sitel.com.ua) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay2.sitel.com.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A40458A5; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:45:41 +0300 (EEST) Received: from relay2.sitel.com.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (houp.sitel.com.ua [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 57033-01; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:45:36 +0300 (EEST) Received: from second (alx2.sitel.com.ua [217.27.144.254]) by relay2.sitel.com.ua (Postfix) with SMTP id 54C0D458B1; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:45:36 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <008e01c594eb$6bbe34a0$0264a8c0@second> From: "Oleksandr Yermolenko" To: Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:45:29 +0300 Organization: ISP "SITEL" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sitel.com.ua Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: asterisk-1.0.9_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Oleksandr Yermolenko List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:45:45 -0000 Hello, Maxim, May you have some ideas why I have this error. I would be grateful for any advices. I'm trying to build asterisk on new fresh installed FreeBSD 5.4 system. I's quite important to me to keep my sip peers using mysql database. I found this link: http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20sip%20mysql%20peers and rebuilt asterisk from fresh ports collections (26 July 2005) make WITHOUT_ZAPTEL=1 WITHOUT_FAX=1 WITHOUT_H323=1 WITH_MYSQL=1 USE_MYSQL_FRIENDS=1, but after I run asterisk I got error: Jul 29 18:00:08 WARNING[21935]: /usr/local/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_sip.so: Undefined symbol "mysql_real_escape_string" Jul 29 18:00:08 WARNING[21935]: Loading module chan_sip.so failed! May you have any ideas about this? I hope. Some additional words about system: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (new server for asterisk) and ports installed > pkg_info asterisk-1.0.9_1 An Open Source PBX and telephony toolkit autoconf-2.53_3 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms autoconf-2.59_2 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms bison-1.75_2 A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with Yacc expat-1.95.8_3 XML 1.0 parser written in C gettext-0.14.5 GNU gettext package gmake-3.80_2 GNU version of 'make' utility help2man-1.35.1 Automatically generating simple manual pages from program o libiconv-1.9.2_1 A character set conversion library libid3tag-0.15.0b_2 ID3 tags library (part of MAD project) libmad-0.15.1b_1 Libmad library (part of MAD project) libogg-1.1.2_1,3 Ogg bitstream library libslang-1.4.9 Routines for rapid alpha-numeric terminal applications deve libtool-1.3.5_2 Generic shared library support script (1.3) libtool-1.5.18 Generic shared library support script (1.5) m4-1.4.3 GNU m4 madplay-0.15.0b_2 Madplay MP3 player (part of MAD project) mpg123-0.59r_17 Command-line player for mpeg layer 1, 2 and 3 audio mysql-client-4.1.13 Multithreaded SQL database (client) newt-0.51.0_2 Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit: console I/O handling library openldap-client-2.2.27 Open source LDAP client implementation p5-gettext-1.03 Message handling functions perl-5.6.2_2 Practical Extraction and Report Language perl-5.8.7 Practical Extraction and Report Language pkgconfig-0.17.2 A utility to retrieve information about installed libraries popt-1.7 A getopt(3) like library with a number of enhancements, fro speex-1.0.5,1 An open-source patent-free voice codec sudo-1.6.8.7 Allow others to run commands as root wget-1.10_1 Retrieve files from the Net via HTTP and FTP > ------------------------ Oleksandr Yermolenko systems engineer ISP "SITEL" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 09:58:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57D016A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:58:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627E143D48 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:58:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 487021F87BEF; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:58:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:58:28 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: "John R. Owens" Message-ID: <20050730095828.GC79432@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: "John R. Owens" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <42EAB453.9010503@ghiapet.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42EAB453.9010503@ghiapet.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make apache2 not making mod_cgi X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:58:30 -0000 # jowens@ghiapet.homeip.net / 2005-07-29 17:57:23 -0500: > the first couple of times I remade apache2, I got a mod_cgi.so > installed. Now, the past couple of times I've remade it (perhaps since > Wednesday or so?), it's making all the modules I want except mod_cgi. > I've cvsup'ed a couple of times since then, and I've got > WITH_MISC_MODULES=yes, but in config.log I find this: > $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-layout=FreeBSD > --with-perl=/usr/local/bin/perl5.8.7 --with-port=80 > --with-expat=/usr/local --with-iconv=/usr/local > --libdir=/usr/local/lib/apache2 --includedir=/usr/local/include/apache2 > --enable-v4-mapped > --disable-autoindex --disable-asis --disable-cgid --disable-cgi > --disable-negotiation > > --with-mpm=worker i386-portbld-freebsd5.4 --prefix=/usr/local ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Note that in --enable-mods-shared, the rest of the MISC category is > included, except cgi. I also find these lines in Makefile.modules that > might be relevant (since I'm not familiar with make syntax, I'm not sure > under what conditions these lines will be active): > WITHOUT_MODULES+= cgi cgi is added to ${WITH_MISC_MODULES} when ${WITH_MPM} contains anything but "prefork", and you build it with the worker mpm. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 09:59:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB7016A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:59:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olgeni@FreeBSD.org) Received: from vsmtp3.tin.it (vsmtp3alice.tin.it [212.216.176.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A40B43D4C for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:59:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olgeni@FreeBSD.org) Received: from olgeni.olgeni (213.45.4.123) by vsmtp3.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 42EB3E8E00002FC2; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:59:22 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olgeni.olgeni (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6U9xLo8046966; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:59:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olgeni@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:59:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Jimmy Olgeni X-X-Sender: olgeni@olgeni.olgeni To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= In-Reply-To: <42EA8696.8020307@cs.tu-berlin.de> Message-ID: <20050730115818.K46813@olgeni.olgeni> References: <42EA7048.7050006@bfoz.net> <42EA8696.8020307@cs.tu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-396595487-1122717561=:46813" Cc: Brandon Fosdick , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Eterm transparency/shading problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:59:25 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-396595487-1122717561=:46813 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Hi, On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Björn König wrote: > This is a bug in Eterm and it has been fixed in the upcoming next release of > Eterm. I just added OPTIONS support and your patch to the port, thanks! -- jimmy --0-396595487-1122717561=:46813-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 10:21:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E94516A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:21:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07DF43D46 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:21:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 18D731F87BEF; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:21:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:21:14 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: "John R. Owens" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050730102113.GE79432@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: "John R. Owens" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <42EAB453.9010503@ghiapet.homeip.net> <20050730095828.GC79432@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050730095828.GC79432@isis.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: Re: make apache2 not making mod_cgi X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:21:16 -0000 # neuhauser@sigpipe.cz / 2005-07-30 11:58:28 +0200: > cgi is added to ${WITH_MISC_MODULES} when ${WITH_MPM} contains added to ${WITHOUT_MODULES}, sorry > anything but "prefork", and you build it with the worker mpm. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 17:18:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF9C16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:18:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rafan@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw) Received: from svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw [140.112.90.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF94843D75 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:18:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rafan@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw) Received: from svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6UHI5bJ033130; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 01:18:05 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from rafan@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw) Received: (from rafan@localhost) by svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6UHI5DI033129; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 01:18:05 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from rafan) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 01:18:05 +0800 From: Rong-En Fan To: Gustavo Schroeder Message-ID: <20050730171805.GA33046@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> References: <42EACD8E.2020107@viawave.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42EACD8E.2020107@viawave.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: mailgraph-1.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:18:08 -0000 Hi, As said in that pr, it should treated by host's administrator. You can change group of maillog to be www or 644. Or even run mailgraph with root. Regards, Rong-En Fan On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 09:45:02PM -0300, Gustavo Schroeder wrote: > Hi, > > i've run into the problem described in > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=60059 > i do not want to add user www to the wheel group > is there a workaround to this problem? or is better to run mailgraph > with user root? > > regards > Gustavo Schroeder From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 18:11:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF4016A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:11:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterj@qubesoft.com) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A5643D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:11:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterj@qubesoft.com) Received: from pete10 ([82.38.179.218]) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:12:36 +0100 Message-ID: <077b01c59532$284374a0$fe32a8c0@pete10> From: "Peter Jeffery" To: "Roman Neuhauser" , "John R. Owens" , References: <42EAB453.9010503@ghiapet.homeip.net><20050730095828.GC79432@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050730102113.GE79432@isis.sigpipe.cz> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:11:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2005 18:12:36.0529 (UTC) FILETIME=[439E7A10:01C59532] Cc: Subject: Re: make apache2 not making mod_cgi X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:11:54 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roman Neuhauser" To: "John R. Owens" ; Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 11:21 AM Subject: Re: make apache2 not making mod_cgi ># neuhauser@sigpipe.cz / 2005-07-30 11:58:28 +0200: >> cgi is added to ${WITH_MISC_MODULES} when ${WITH_MPM} contains > > added to ${WITHOUT_MODULES}, sorry > >> anything but "prefork", and you build it with the worker mpm. > mod_cgid does the job for you, when you are using a threaded apache. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 19:41:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1423916A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:41:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfarrokhi@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE5E43D49 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:41:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfarrokhi@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so802436wra for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HOdwnANQA3W/cId7++KmiwGuFp03qbeDvvgPSXl1Vy56bHdPLNmfqMcJ+5UQ5TARzHHqsacw39N+/aLcf459F+Mn5mNQU+9L8rBr3xvGbM0EmOEOuF6F6aQorYDqp68tMt7aRKw7m3FmaQa6nbjFK0ZdFJlroWIPCB10emHdif0= Received: by 10.54.42.38 with SMTP id p38mr1995599wrp; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.3.37 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9f7e126b050730124130c9bf87@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 00:11:40 +0430 From: Babak Farrokhi To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: <20050729203324.GA19476@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729020225.GA28471@soaustin.net> <20050729102158.GA73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729203324.GA19476@soaustin.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Babak Farrokhi List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:41:42 -0000 On 7/30/05, Mark Linimon wrote: > > If the maintainer is inactive, there isn't one. But we want to encourage > more people to be active maintainers. >=20 Good point. How do you encourage people to be active maintainers/contributo= rs? Let me give you an example: I am the maintainer for www/eventum. The current version in ports tree was 1.5.4 so I submitted the patch for 1.5.5 (ports/84297) and now version 1.6.0 is out but the patch is not submitted despite I was the maintainer myself. Another example: I submitted patch to update editors/vim to patchlevel 79, now this version is vulnerable to arbitrary command execution according to CAN-2005-2368. So I submitted the patchlevel 85 (ports/84145) and also notified security-team@. But the port is still awaiting approval. There is really something wrong with the port management process. People's work is not being respected. So how do I get encouraged to submit my patches? --=20 Babak Farrokhi email: babak@farrokhi.net web: http://farrokhi.net/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 20:04:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EB916A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:04:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB8E43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:04:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.101] (adsl-65-71-93-204.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [65.71.93.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16BD3FC39 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:03:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:03:35 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <0B689B1DF466EF5C97989D7C@Paul-Schmehls-Computer.local> In-Reply-To: <20050730092605.GB79432@isis.sigpipe.cz> References: <20050730092605.GB79432@isis.sigpipe.cz> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: Fixing up man pages X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:04:02 -0000 --On July 30, 2005 11:26:05 AM +0200 Roman Neuhauser wrote: ># pauls@utdallas.edu / 2005-07-29 19:10:59 -0500: >> I'm working on updating the x11-toolkits/iwidgets port, and I've run >> into a problem. The man pages install fine, but they aren't formatted >> correctly. > > What does "formatted correctly" mean? Can you paste the output, and > what you want it to look like instead? > >> In the Makefile for the source, there is a section that deals with the >> man pages like this: >> >> @cd $(TOP_DIR)/doc; for i in *.n; \ >> do \ >> rm -f $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename $$i`; \ >> rm -f $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename iwidgets_$$i`; \ >> sed -e '/man\.macros/r man.macros' -e '/man\.macros/d' \ >> $$i > $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename iwidgets_$$i`; \ >> chmod 444 $(MAN_INSTALL_DIR)/`basename iwidgets_$$i`; \ >> done; >> >> How can I incorporate this into the port Makefile so that the man pages >> will be properly formatted? > > The only "formatting" this does is replace the first occurrence > of "man.macros" on any line with the contents of > $(TOP_DIR)/doc/man.macros. Is that's what you mean? > I posted a question about the sed script in questions, and once I understood the guy's answer (which took a while), I got it working. Here's the working version: @${SED} -e '/man\.macros/r ${WRKSRC}/doc/man.macros' \ -e '/man\.macros/d' ${WRKSRC}/doc/${f} > ${WRKDIR}/${f} What this does is parse man.macros for the string man\.macros and, if found, use it as input to the second part that removes the string man\.macros from the input stream and then feeds it to the file ${f}, which is the manpage in the source. Once the macro is in the manpage, man can display it properly. Now I have a "philosophical" question. The iwidgets source creates the manpages with the name "iwidgets_{manpage name}" (e.g. toolbar.n becomes iwidgets_toolbar.n). In the source, the manpages are named "toolbar", and the src Makefile changes the name to iwidgets_toolbar. Should I create the man pages with the same names? Or prefix the iwidgets_ to them? One final question. Do I submit this as patches to the existing port? Or just submit it as if it's a new port? (It's completely different from the existing port in the way it handles the install.) Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 20:18:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABDD16A420 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:18:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BEA43D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:18:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 14CDC27B4; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:18:02 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:18:02 -0500 To: Babak Farrokhi Message-ID: <20050730201802.GA29320@soaustin.net> References: <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729020225.GA28471@soaustin.net> <20050729102158.GA73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729203324.GA19476@soaustin.net> <9f7e126b050730124130c9bf87@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9f7e126b050730124130c9bf87@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:18:03 -0000 On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 12:11:40AM +0430, Babak Farrokhi wrote: > Let me give you an example: I am the maintainer for www/eventum. The > current version in ports tree was 1.5.4 so I submitted the patch for > 1.5.5 (ports/84297) and now version 1.6.0 is out but the patch is not > submitted despite I was the maintainer myself. Although I share your frustration at getting bugs fixed and upgrades committed, it is fair to note that 84297 came in only yesterday. The correct thing to do here is to do a followup with the patches to 1.6.0. Whoever picks up the PR will then be able to skip the earlier patch. > Another example: I submitted patch to update editors/vim to patchlevel > 79, now this version is vulnerable to arbitrary command execution > according to CAN-2005-2368. So I submitted the patchlevel 85 > (ports/84145) and also notified security-team@. But the port is still > awaiting approval. Well, 84145 isn't labeled as a security update in the Synopsis, which might have helped. I'll note that the maintainer did commit your previous update patch within a day, although it has been several days on this one. I can't speak to what secteam has done, you would have to ask them. > There is really something wrong with the port management process. > People's work is not being respected. So how do I get encouraged to > submit my patches? We have 173 people with port commit bits (some of whom are more active than others) and an average of around 30 ports PRs arriving per day. Since all the ports committers are volunteers, it's not possible to compel them to commit anything -- all we can do is to encourage, and to offer recognition. I think we do pretty well keeping up with the incoming PR flood (the rate of which, by the way, continues to increase.) It's not a perfect process, but I really don't know of what else that we can do in a volunteer project. Slightly different topic: There's another "management" principle about individuals at work here, that bears reiteration: "praise in public, criticize in private". It's completely fair for you, or anyone else, to criticize our processes in public. But when it comes down to people that feel that another FreeBSD contributor isn't pulling their weight, I'd much rather see those complaints first go to the groups that have accepted the responsibility to look after such things -- for ports, portmgr; for security, secteam; and if both of them fall down on the job, core. Remember that everyone here is doing this work because it's fun or it gives them some kind of satisfaction (as are you, yourself, when you help us out by submitting patches), and thank-yous are always a much more effective motivator than criticism. Please don't take this as particularly directed at you. A common theme in this thread -- which hasn't yet been commented on -- is that certain individual contributors are not pulling their weight, as it were. In the meantime, I'll put my portmgr hat on and note that it has been many months since anyone has directly submitted a complaint to portmgr about an individual. I would much rather these things be worked out via email in that venue. I hope people can take this advice as constructive criticism. But to summarize, we welcome your contributions, but you have to be prepared to be realistic about what a team of volunteers is going to be able to accomplish. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 20:36:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4FE16A41F for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:36:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72E543D45 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:36:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from [10.0.0.4] (12-216-244-56.client.mchsi.com[12.216.244.56]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with ESMTP id <20050730203628m9100g6lj4e>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:36:29 +0000 Message-ID: <42EBE4CC.2000502@math.missouri.edu> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:36:28 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050728 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729020225.GA28471@soaustin.net> <20050729102158.GA73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729203324.GA19476@soaustin.net> <9f7e126b050730124130c9bf87@mail.gmail.com> <20050730201802.GA29320@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20050730201802.GA29320@soaustin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:36:30 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 12:11:40AM +0430, Babak Farrokhi wrote: >>There is really something wrong with the port management process. >>People's work is not being respected. So how do I get encouraged to >>submit my patches? > > We have 173 people with port commit bits (some of whom are more active > than others) and an average of around 30 ports PRs arriving per day. > Since all the ports committers are volunteers, it's not possible to > compel them to commit anything -- all we can do is to encourage, and to > offer recognition. I think we do pretty well keeping up with the > incoming PR flood (the rate of which, by the way, continues to increase.) > > It's not a perfect process, but I really don't know of what else that > we can do in a volunteer project. As a maintainer of a few of the ports, I am really quite pleased with how well it works. I think it depends a bit on your expectations. I never expect my updates to be looked at very quickly (but sometimes I am pleasantly surprized), but I always find that my updates are looked at after a couple of months. Considering that this is a volunteer project, I consider this completely acceptable. I think it is a question of whether you see the glass as half full or half empty. Stephen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 30 21:00:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C900316A422 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:00:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (port324.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.113.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8952343D66 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:00:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000) id B8AC111B07; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:00:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:00:33 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Babak Farrokhi Message-ID: <20050730210033.GM930@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728170401.GA9534@soaustin.net> <20050728172249.GD66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728175142.GA11503@soaustin.net> <20050728225650.GE66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729020225.GA28471@soaustin.net> <20050729102158.GA73490@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050729203324.GA19476@soaustin.net> <9f7e126b050730124130c9bf87@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SBT+cnFS/G3NVgv4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9f7e126b050730124130c9bf87@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:00:56 -0000 --SBT+cnFS/G3NVgv4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2005.07.31 00:11:40 +0430, Babak Farrokhi wrote: > Another example: I submitted patch to update editors/vim to patchlevel > 79, now this version is vulnerable to arbitrary command execution > according to CAN-2005-2368. So I submitted the patchlevel 85 > (ports/84145) and also notified security-team@. But the port is still > awaiting approval. With my Security Team hat: When updating port for security issues it's always a weighting of getting the fix in ASAP and waiting for maintainer approval/review. Waiting for the maintainer is not just a matter of courtesy, but is also done to make sure the patch doesn't break more than it fixes. In general the Security Team don't know much about the inner workings of each particular port. For this particular case I know remko@ has been working on it and has an almost ready to commit VuXML entry for the issue. I don't know the status of the port update, other than what the PR says. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Security Team --SBT+cnFS/G3NVgv4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC6+pxh9pcDSc1mlERAgJaAKCl/n/9agnExc9QMyIBBe7oPDyGBgCeIeTv GhT8hdtE0FRCWnQB0q217Ls= =yJbw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SBT+cnFS/G3NVgv4--