Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 03:13:18 +0400 From: Tarc <tarc@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system Message-ID: <20060527231317.GB1161@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> Resent-Message-ID: <20060528002135.GA13017@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <20060527155903.GA7307@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <4477C401.2080307@rogers.com> <38C8392F-C345-41F7-A879-6C2F5D2C59F5@orthanc.ca> <b1fa29170605262035u4ac8f3jc0a022f335903522@mail.gmail.com> <1B5AEAC9-2A87-40F1-B2D4-2069DCBC30FE@orthanc.ca> <4477EFDF.80608@alumni.rice.edu> <9f7850090605262331j352d98acwa3837251300c591b@mail.gmail.com> <4477F687.2030109@FreeBSD.org> <20060527065621.GA4814@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060527095711.GJ744@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20060527155903.GA7307@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yes, I know. Now, how many ports need this treatment? Not many ports really use fortran to build. I don't have and never install fortran (and tcsh). If some port really need f77 (aka g77) I'll install fortran and build this package. Offtopic: what is about to remove TCSH too, or add it to ports collection? I also never build and install TCHS and have found only one port, which depends on this shell: OpenOffice. OO doesn't depend on TCSH after install, but I should convet some build files from OO distribution to sh(1) compatiable. > > Do we cleanup the sys.mk file? Grep for FC, f77, .f > Do we add .F90, .f90, and .mod? I think, we should add them, but not remove ... and also add PROG_XXX (or via PROG_LANG) support to bsd.prog.mk. Becouse <bsd.*.mk> files are very simple to use(but they are not commented well) and when fortran program contains more than one file, it's too hard to simplify your makefiles. -- Best regards, Arseny Nasokin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060527231317.GB1161>