From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 18 11:08:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C0016A407 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:08:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5333143CA8 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:08:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBIB8JRL089849 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:08:19 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id kBIB8IOx089845 for freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:08:18 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:08:18 GMT Message-Id: <200612181108.kBIB8IOx089845@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: linimon set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:08:35 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/104959 eclipse java/eclipse does not work on 7-CURRENT: Undefined sym 1 problem total. From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 21 11:32:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.Org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.Org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A2A16A83E for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D17813C44C for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (fenner@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBLA13Zo020255 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:01:03 GMT (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id kBLA139j020254; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:01:03 GMT (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:01:03 GMT Message-Id: <200612211001.kBLA139j020254@freefall.freebsd.org> From: fenner@FreeBSD.Org (Bill "distfiles" Fenner) To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.Org Cc: Subject: FreeBSD ports: 2 unfetchable distfiles: java/eclipse-devel, java/eclipse-webtools X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ports@FreeBSD.Org List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:32:33 -0000 Dear freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org, You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 2 ports whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could you please visit http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org.html and correct the problems listed there? The individual ports with problems are java/eclipse-devel,java/eclipse-webtools. If you have already corrected the problems and submitted a PR, please accept my thanks and apologies for the delay in getting the fixes into the tree. This reminder is created automatically and does not (yet) have a way to know if a PR fixing the problem has been submitted. Please do *NOT* send your response to me directly; I do not necessarily have time to commit your fix; please instead submit a PR via 'send-pr' so it doesn't get lost. Problems are usually of two types: 1. The software package has been upgraded and the version in the port has been removed. The best solution to this problem is to upgrade the port to the most current version of the software package. If you are a FreeBSD committer, then you can just upgrade the port directly. If not, you should create the updated port on your own machine, test it (and maybe even run "portlint" on it), and then use "send-pr" to submit a "diff -uNr old-port updated-port". If you added or deleted any files, please make an explicit note of it. 2. The mirror site being used no longer contains the software package in question, or no longer exists. Solutions include: a) If there are other mirror sites, just remove the bad site from the list. (Make sure that what appears to be a bad site isn't actually a problem of type 1, upgrade) b) If the README or other support files in the software documentation mention where to get the software package, use one of those sites. c) Use a search engine to find another place to get the original DISTFILES. Make sure that you don't pick a FreeBSD distfiles mirror -- if you can't find any other places where the file exists, it can be a LOCAL_PORT or you can simply comment out the MASTER_SITES= line, with a comment explaining why. Once you have a solution, use "send-pr" to submit a "diff -u" of the Makefile. Note that this isn't an urgent issue, as people who try to build the port now will just fall back to the FreeBSD distfiles mirror. Please just put it on your list to do and get to it when you have time. These messages will continue to arrive twice a month until the fix is committed, as a reminder. Thanks, Bill "distfiles" Fenner. From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 23 19:27:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eclipse@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6783616A407 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A2513C44E for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so3610787nfc for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:27:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=OhJUybMWLW4YgTPegppVX3N8TP+FXybka8cNunCYiU1htOGiEOaGzMaH6ZxLXkoDcYDerzu92Hc8DnAS9kM/k7BF93c8xgkU8BoAwG3M1wfm5dAKJhvNBhyJBe1I9jEiynP1D+ZuRI98NFUlmhU7DYMYkfmxZbVDFnAEeBNBMmU= Received: by 10.78.160.2 with SMTP id i2mr966359hue.1166900586985; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:03:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.16 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:03:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:03:06 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: emulation@FreeBSD.org, eclipse@FreeBSD.org, ia64@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: c7cb24d2550570c0 Cc: Subject: Overlong mailing-list maintainer address in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:27:25 -0000 It is by tradition that we use shorter unambiguous mailing-list addresses as port's maintainers ad- dresses. There are several ports with the following long addresses in the collection: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.org Please change them to their counterparts without the "freebsd-" prefix, give me a go-ahead if you want me to change them, leave this message unan- swered if you don't care (I'll change them after a time-out), or speak up if you have anything against the change. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 23 20:07:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eclipse@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9D016A412; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4840F13C448; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([83.239.48.161]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id kBNJswBo070698; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:55:08 +0300 (MSK) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GyCvB-0000Ko-Uh; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:52:41 +0300 To: "Andrew Pantyukhin" References: From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:52:41 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Andrew Pantyukhin's message of "Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:03:06 +0300") Message-ID: <21940630@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org, eclipse@FreeBSD.org, ia64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Overlong mailing-list maintainer address in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:07:02 -0000 On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:03:06 +0300 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > It is by tradition that we use shorter unambiguous > mailing-list addresses as port's maintainers ad- > dresses. There are several ports with the following > long addresses in the collection: > freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org > freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org > freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.org > Please change them to their counterparts without > the "freebsd-" prefix, give me a go-ahead if you > want me to change them, leave this message unan- > swered if you don't care (I'll change them after a > time-out), or speak up if you have anything against > the change. Since I've seen many commits to GNATS last months to change those addresses to canonical names (freebsd-*), it seems to me that current policy is quite the opposite. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 23 20:34:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eclipse@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FA316A407 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:34:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DCC13C458 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:34:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so3626840nfc for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:34:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=RSzO89KGFl5NBB9WEI0WnaTcYnIPQJ6DI+k7VF5enF4VEI5qPBkMKCGbDOlFRON9zzkr5K1JWZ1y1g5P1hBqy82ItX/dZ0itCn+80MeByTqrdb/91O9VyB4jU7urGIeHfDRF+mKwLSCf11xRXppoVSLySnv3cog2BMG7/oGGbEM= Received: by 10.78.204.20 with SMTP id b20mr1761186hug.1166906089687; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:34:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.167.16 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:34:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 23:34:49 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Boris Samorodov" In-Reply-To: <21940630@bsam.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <21940630@bsam.ru> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 10cca2d333de2dd0 Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, eclipse@freebsd.org, ia64@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Overlong mailing-list maintainer address in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:34:51 -0000 On 12/23/06, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:03:06 +0300 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > > It is by tradition that we use shorter unambiguous > > mailing-list addresses as port's maintainers ad- > > dresses. There are several ports with the following > > long addresses in the collection: > > > freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org > > freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org > > freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.org > > > Please change them to their counterparts without > > the "freebsd-" prefix, give me a go-ahead if you > > want me to change them, leave this message unan- > > swered if you don't care (I'll change them after a > > time-out), or speak up if you have anything against > > the change. > > Since I've seen many commits to GNATS last months to change > those addresses to canonical names (freebsd-*), it seems to > me that current policy is quite the opposite. Do you mean problem reports? Please understand that with over 5600 ports pointing to FreeBSD mailing-lists just "many" may not be enough. Of them all only 43 have "freebsd-"-prefixed addresses. From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 23 21:43:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eclipse@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB61916A416; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE19713C434; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id BB40964D; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:17:25 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:17:25 -0600 To: Andrew Pantyukhin Message-ID: <20061223211725.GB24163@soaustin.net> References: <21940630@bsam.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Boris Samorodov , emulation@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, ia64@freebsd.org, eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Overlong mailing-list maintainer address in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:43:17 -0000 IIRC the short form is used for maintainership, the long form is used for the mailing list names. See the following, and let me know if there are any bugs in it: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pr-guidelines/pr-types.html mcl