From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 27 19:51:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C3716A4C9 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:51:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca) Received: from dargo.cs.uoguelph.ca (dargo.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.94.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E1143D77 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:51:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rick@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca) Received: from snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca (snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca [131.104.48.1]) by dargo.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k2RJpJBQ016292 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:51:19 -0500 Received: (from rick@localhost) by snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA37107 for fs@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:52:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:52:15 -0500 (EST) From: rick@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca Message-Id: <200603271952.OAA37107@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca> To: fs@freebsd.org X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 131.104.94.197 Cc: Subject: NFS server setattr bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:51:27 -0000 The following bug was just identified in OpenBSD and it looks like the same bug exists in the other BSDen NFS servers. A Linux client (don't know which version, but you can look at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6256 does a Setattr of mtime to the server's time, where the file is mode 0664 and the client user has group access (ie. caller is not the file owner). The BSD servers fail the Setattr with EPERM, since the VA_UTIMES_NULL flag isn't set before doing the VOP_SETATTR. It seems to me that this should be allowed, since it is allowed for a local utimes(2). If so, the fix is to set VA_UTIMES_NULL for the "set-time-to-server-time" cases of setting atime and/or mtime. Sound reasonable? rick From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 29 09:52:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFA216A422 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rabing@omc.net) Received: from office.omc.net (office.omc.net [212.77.224.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586BD43D4C for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:52:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rabing@omc.net) Received: from xoffice.omc.net (xoffice.omc.net [212.77.224.172]) by office.omc.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2T9qNYS056183 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:52:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rabing@omc.net) Received: from [212.77.224.50] (lutz.omc.net [212.77.224.50]) by xoffice.omc.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k2T9qNNJ085608 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:52:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rabing@omc.net) From: "Lutz Rabing" Organization: OMCnet IS GmbH To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:52:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <442A74F5.22886.69057A7E@rabing.omc.net> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.31) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: UFS2 with 4TB disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rabing@omc.net List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:52:27 -0000 hope this is the right list... I have a "FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar 21 13:29:33 CET 2006" system with an Areca Raid6 controller (12 x 400GB) which presents a 4TB disk (da0) to the system: da0 at arcmsr0 bus 0 target 7 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 166.666MB/s transfers (83.333MHz, offset 32, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 3814695MB (7812495360 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 486305C) when I newfs and label do work when I install the OS. however, after booting the system from an usb-stick (da1) and change root-fs to da0 I miss 2TB of storage. At least I can't tellif it's there or not. "/usr" should be 3.6TB and shows this: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 989M 55M 855M 6% / devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev /dev/da0s1e 1.9G 26K 1.8G 0% /tmp /dev/da0s1f 1.6T 1.6G 1.4T 0% /usr /dev/da0s1d 9.7G 27M 8.9G 0% /var devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /var/named/dev The label editor from sysinstall shows this: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disk: da0 Partition name: da0s1 Free: 0 blocks (0MB) Part Mount Size Newfs Part Mount Size Newfs ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- da0s1a / 1024MB UFS2 N da0s1b swap 2048MB SWAP da0s1d /var 10240MB UFS2+S N da0s1e /tmp 2048MB UFS2+S N da0s1f /usr 1662GB UFS2+S N Output from sysinstall/FDISK: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disk name: da0 FDISK Partition Editor DISK Geometry: 486305 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 7812489825 sectors (3814692MB) Offset Size(ST) End Name PType Desc Subtype Flags 0 63 62 - 12 unused 0 63 3517522466 3517522528 da0s1 8 freebsd 165 3517522529 4294972831 7812495359 - 12 unused 0 So, my question is, how big is my "/usr" slice? 1.6TB or 3.6TB? Thanks, Lutz Rabing From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 29 10:05:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA5F16A41F for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:05:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9FF43D49 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:04:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2TA4tR6098701; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:04:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <442A5BC7.3040208@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:04:55 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rabing@omc.net References: <442A74F5.22886.69057A7E@rabing.omc.net> In-Reply-To: <442A74F5.22886.69057A7E@rabing.omc.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS2 with 4TB disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:05:00 -0000 Lutz Rabing wrote: > hope this is the right list... > > I have a "FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar 21 13:29:33 CET 2006" system > with an Areca Raid6 controller (12 x 400GB) which presents a 4TB disk (da0) > to the system: > > da0 at arcmsr0 bus 0 target 7 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > da0: 166.666MB/s transfers (83.333MHz, offset 32, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled > da0: 3814695MB (7812495360 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 486305C) > > when I newfs and label do work when I install the OS. however, after booting the > system from an usb-stick (da1) and change root-fs to da0 I miss 2TB of storage. > At least I can't tellif it's there or not. "/usr" should be 3.6TB and shows > this: > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/da0s1a 989M 55M 855M 6% / > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > /dev/da0s1e 1.9G 26K 1.8G 0% /tmp > /dev/da0s1f 1.6T 1.6G 1.4T 0% /usr > /dev/da0s1d 9.7G 27M 8.9G 0% /var > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /var/named/dev > > > The label editor from sysinstall shows this: > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Disk: da0 Partition name: da0s1 Free: 0 blocks (0MB) > > Part Mount Size Newfs Part Mount Size Newfs > ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- > da0s1a / 1024MB UFS2 N > da0s1b swap 2048MB SWAP > da0s1d /var 10240MB UFS2+S N > da0s1e /tmp 2048MB UFS2+S N > da0s1f /usr 1662GB UFS2+S N > > > Output from sysinstall/FDISK: > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Disk name: da0 FDISK Partition Editor > DISK Geometry: 486305 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 7812489825 sectors (3814692MB) > > Offset Size(ST) End Name PType Desc Subtype Flags > > 0 63 62 - 12 unused 0 > 63 3517522466 3517522528 da0s1 8 freebsd 165 > 3517522529 4294972831 7812495359 - 12 unused 0 > > > So, my question is, how big is my "/usr" slice? 1.6TB or 3.6TB? > > Thanks, > Lutz Rabing The FDISK and bsdlabel schemes simply cannot deal with >2TB. You'll need to either put your filesystem directly on the storage device without and slices/labels, or use GPT to create logical partitions. Scott From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 29 11:54:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1A916A41F for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0F243D45 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:54:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256402096; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:53:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D1E2081; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:53:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7210A33C8D; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:53:58 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Scott Long References: <442A74F5.22886.69057A7E@rabing.omc.net> <442A5BC7.3040208@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:53:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <442A5BC7.3040208@samsco.org> (Scott Long's message of "Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:04:55 -0700") Message-ID: <86bqvpcvqh.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, rabing@omc.net Subject: Re: UFS2 with 4TB disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:54:05 -0000 Scott Long writes: > The FDISK and bsdlabel schemes simply cannot deal with >2TB. You'll > need to either put your filesystem directly on the storage device > without and slices/labels, or use GPT to create logical partitions. I wouldn't recommend GPT for production use quite yet. There are at least two issues with it: first, it does not implement a full set of control verbs for administration tasks; second, it enforces exclusive access whenever a consumer asks for write access. The combination of the two means that 'gpt show' doesn't work if one of the slices is mounted. You *can* create new slices on the fly (there is an "add" verb), but you're flying blind: you have no idea how much space is left, or whether another slice with the same label already exists. (note that this is does not affect access to existing slices, and is not a fundamental flaw, but it *is* a pretty serious usability issue IMHO) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 29 15:26:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0877916A401 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from fw.zoral.com.ua (ll-227.216.82.212.sovam.net.ua [212.82.216.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E409043D48 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:26:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k2TFQ9Tb097207 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:26:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k2TFQ9hQ055075 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:26:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k2TFQ926055074 for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:26:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:26:09 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060329152608.GB1375@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qcHopEYAB45HaUaB" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua Subject: [patch] giant-less quotas for UFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:26:33 -0000 --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I already mailed about my development of the patch that allows for UFS with quotas to operate without Giant. Sorry if the repeat would be annoying. I have spent time from my previous announcement testing the patch and bringing it up with HEAD. With current version, patched system successfully builds/tests the perl 5.8.8 simultaneously with cycle like while quotaon && quotaoff ; do : ; done and periodical quota editing for the user owning the build processes. This includes the lowering/increasing inode/block quotas below/over current allocation numbers. I think that the patch is stable enough to ask for the wider testing and review. For the description of the patch, see http://kostikbel.narod.ru/quotagiant/ Current (as of today) version of the patch: http://kostikbel.narod.ru/quotagiant/quotas-20060329-1738.patch Please, could you give the patch more testing and exposure ? Your criticism and suggestions are strongly appreciated. Best regards, Kostik Belousov. --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEKqcPC3+MBN1Mb4gRAlObAKCKePK3xRkt/Ac+ctTaTO8vRLSBwQCfU2Mn /04k39m+bcGdQDJCiSpX5Q0= =MV8T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 29 20:38:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962D316A401 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E45343D46 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:38:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [10.10.3.185] ([69.15.205.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2TKciU3002109; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:38:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <442AF04E.7070907@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:38:38 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060206 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kostik Belousov References: <20060329152608.GB1375@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20060329152608.GB1375@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] giant-less quotas for UFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:38:49 -0000 Kostik Belousov wrote: > I already mailed about my development of the patch that > allows for UFS with quotas to operate without Giant. Sorry if the > repeat would be annoying. > > I have spent time from my previous announcement testing the patch > and bringing it up with HEAD. With current version, patched system > successfully builds/tests the perl 5.8.8 simultaneously with cycle like > > while quotaon && quotaoff ; do : ; done > > and periodical quota editing for the user owning the build processes. This > includes the lowering/increasing inode/block quotas below/over current > allocation numbers. > > I think that the patch is stable enough to ask for the wider testing > and review. > > For the description of the patch, see > http://kostikbel.narod.ru/quotagiant/ > > Current (as of today) version of the patch: > http://kostikbel.narod.ru/quotagiant/quotas-20060329-1738.patch > > Please, could you give the patch more testing and exposure ? > Your criticism and suggestions are strongly appreciated. > > Best regards, > Kostik Belousov. I'm not terribly interested in quotas themselves, but I am interested in UFS. If no one else contacts you about picking up these patches, let me know. Scott From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 29 22:02:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EA516A400 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebeobozidar@metro2000.net) Received: from igateway.com (80-103-119-59.mad1.adsl.uni2.es [80.103.119.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF68A43D46 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:02:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ebeobozidar@metro2000.net) Message-ID: <000001c6537c$6845e8e0$3945a8c0@ryi86> From: "Bozidar Eberly" To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:02:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: news good X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bozidar Eberly List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:02:10 -0000 De L ar Home Ow Y ner ,=20 =20 Your cr E edit doesn't matter to us ! If you OW Q N real e B st Y at X e and want IMMED p IAT S E c P ash to sp f end ANY way you like, or simply wish=20 to L W OWER your monthly p 6 ayments by a third or more, here are the deal u s=20 we have T d OD k AY :=20 =20 $48 c 8,000.00 at a 3.6 Y 7% fi N xed-rat a e=20 $3 F 72,000.00 at a 3 q .90% vari F able-rat Y e=20 $49 p 2,000.00 at a 3.2 O 1% inte K res 1 t-only=20 $2 c 48,000.00 at a 3. j 36% f V ixed-ra i te=20 $19 r 8,000.00 at a 3.5 j 5% vari J able-rat u e=20 =20 Hur w ry, when these dea l Is are gone, they are gone ! =20 Don't worry about appro 6 val, your credi 4 t will not disqualif c y you !=20 =20 V j isit our sit X e =20 =20 Sincerely, Bozidar Eberly =20 Approva Q l Manager From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 31 06:53:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D746816A400 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grippoibenia@hanarotel.net) Received: from hanarotel.net (215.Red-83-33-150.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.33.150.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09A6F43D45 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:53:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grippoibenia@hanarotel.net) Message-ID: <000001c6548f$cabcb8a0$5852a8c0@ozw5> From: "Beniamino Grippo" To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 01:53:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: news day X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Beniamino Grippo List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:53:23 -0000 D m ear Home O h wner ,=20 =20 Your c t red R it doesn't matter to us !=20 =20 Your c t red d it doesn't matter to us ! If you O U WN real e P st d at A e=20 and want IMME 6 DIA D TE ca H sh to spe b nd ANY way you like, or simply wish=20 to L 2 OWER your monthly p s ayme t nts by a third or more, here are the d 3 eaI a s=20 we have T R OD s AY :=20 =20 $ 4 v 88,000 at a 3,6 l 7% f 7 ixed - ra q te=20 $ 3 W 72,000 at a 3,9 w 0% va K riable - rat m e=20 $ 4 W 92,000 at a 3, q 21% i i ntere c st - onl N y=20 $ 24 T 8,000 at a 3,3 G 6% f m ixed - ra Y te=20 $ 1 x 98,000 at a 3, l 55% var d iable - rat 1 e=20 =20 H J urry, when these d i eaI i s are gone, they are gone ! =20 Don't worry about app B roval, your c F redit will not d U isqua N lify you !=20 =20 V l isi C t our s l ite =20 =20 Sincerely, Beniamino Grippo =20 A l pprova a l Manager From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 1 20:20:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D8016A401 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2006 20:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1E143D53 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2006 20:20:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [192.168.42.21] (andersonbox1.centtech.com [192.168.42.21]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k31KKIFM099838 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2006 14:20:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <442EE07B.6050000@centtech.com> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 14:20:11 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1364/Thu Mar 30 14:05:50 2006 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Opinions on interesting VFS calls X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 20:20:20 -0000 I'm still tinkering on a vfsstats tool in my spare time, and I've got a few questions for those interested: 1. What are the top ten most interesting vfs calls for statistics purposes? 2. How important is it to *not* change the statfs structure? (I know this breaks a lot of tools, I've tried it already) 3. Is it ok for me to use the f_spare[10] slot in statfs for this? 4. If 4 is OK, then is 10 enough for storing the most important calls? If it isn't, then I'm stuck breaking the statfs struct, right? Thanks! Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------