From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 30 12:40:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8CB16A5C5; Tue, 30 May 2006 12:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from mh2.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6E343D6B; Tue, 30 May 2006 12:40:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh2.centtech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4UCeour059622; Tue, 30 May 2006 07:40:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <447C3D56.1030900@centtech.com> Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 07:40:54 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060506) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: etalk etalk References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1499/Mon May 29 15:35:17 2006 on mh2.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: about ufs filesystem io performance! X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 12:41:01 -0000 etalk etalk wrote: > >> From: Eric Anderson >> To: etalk etalk >> CC: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: about ufs filesystem io performance! >> Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:46:44 -0500 >> >> etalk etalk wrote: >>> 5.3 vs 6.0 The test tool is Iozone3_257, and the test command is >>> ?/iozone -A -f /mnt/tmpfile.test -g 1g -n 1m -q 8k -y 2k -R -b >>> outfile-Af.xls ?(http://www.iozone.org/src/current/). We ran all the >>> tests on the same PC with 2.4 GHz Pentium CPU and 512M main memory. >>> Figure1~Figure5 show the results of the file system performance >>> comparison between Bsd5.3抯 UFS2 and Bsd6.0抯 UFS2 when testing with >>> different file system (local, sync, async, softupdate, sync+softupdate). >>> According to the figures, our conclusion is: On all kinds of file >>> systems, the write, rewrite, read and reread performance of the two >>> is almost same and we cant say that Bsd6.0 make a improvement on file >>> system IO performance. >>> http://blog.csdn.net/minerboyIo/Gallery/204114.aspx >>> linux2.6.11 vs bsd 5.3 The test tool is Iozone3_257, and the test >>> command is ?/iozone -A -f /mnt/tmpfile.test -g 1g -n 4m -q 8k -y 2k >>> -R -b outfile-Af.xls ?(http://www.iozone.org/src/current/). We ran >>> all the tests on the same PC with 2.4 GHz Pentium CPU and 512M main >>> memory, Figure1, Figure2, Figure3 show the results of the file system >>> performance comparison between Bsd抯 UFS2 and Linux?Ext3 (the Linux >>> kernel version is 2.6.11, and the Bsd kernel version is 5.3) when >>> testing with sync, async and local (Bsd using softupdate) file >>> system. According to the figures, our conclusion is: a.On local file >>> system and async file system, Fedora4抯 write and rewrite is much >>> faster than Bsd5.3抯 (about 5-10 times). b.On all kinds of file >>> systems, the read and reread performance of FreeBsd5.3 is about >>> 50%-90% lower than that of Fedora4. c.On sync file system, Bsd5.3 >>> writes several times faster than Fedora4 does and rewrites over two >>> hundred times faster than Fedora4 does. >>> http://blog.csdn.net/minerboyIo/Gallery/204107.aspx >> >> You don't report the type of disks you are using, or anything about >> the storage. For the first test, I'd think that it's possible that >> you were hitting hardware performance bottlenecks before actually >> testing the filesystem performance. >> >> Also, what are the 2,4,8 numbers referencing? How many times did you >> run the tests? >> >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology >> Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Thanks for your reply! > My disk is Maxtor 2F040L0 with 40GB capacity , 5400 rpm and <12ms ave > seek time, and the 2,4,8 is the block size when doing the writes and > reads, We do the tests two times,and the results is same,One of the > results is in the attachment! > > According to the conclusions,our puzzles is : > > a. Why the write and rewrite performance of FreeBsd5.3 is so lower > than that of Fedora4 in async system or in local system? Can we improve > the performace by tuning the FreeBsd5.3's kernel or by making some > modifition to the kernel of FreeBsd5.3 in the file vfs_bio.c? > > b. Is Bsd6.0 make improvement in file system io performance when > comparing to Bsd5.3? > > I am eager to have your reply! > > > Best Regards > > etalk I'm no expert, but the drive you used is (in my opinion) insufficient to fully test filesystem's. You really need to remove as much hardware from the bottleneck path as possible. Preferably using something like a Gigabyte i-Ram device, or possibly memory disks. FreeBSD 6.1+ has many many filesystem improvements, so I would highly suggest re-running the benchmarks on that, and also on the newer 2.6 Linux kernels. I also suggest more than 2 runs - something like 5-7 would be a good start I think. You might also do some tests on very large (100Tb or bigger) and very small (30mb or smaller) filesystem sizes. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 30 18:40:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B602316A7A3; Tue, 30 May 2006 18:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from natial.ongs.co.jp (natial.ongs.co.jp [202.216.232.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F9D43D48; Tue, 30 May 2006 18:40:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (dullmdaler.ongs.co.jp [202.216.232.62]) by natial.ongs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98648244C3A; Wed, 31 May 2006 03:40:28 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <447C919B.20303@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 03:40:27 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060424) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: <43E5D052.3020207@freebsd.org> <43E656C7.8040302@freesbie.org> <43E6D5C8.4050405@freebsd.org> <43E71485.5040901@freesbie.org> <43E73330.8070101@freebsd.org> <43EB4C00.2030101@freebsd.org> <4417DD8D.3050201@freebsd.org> <4433CA53.5050000@freebsd.org> <444E13BA.8050902@freebsd.org> <4475C119.1020305@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4475C119.1020305@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:47:01 +0000 Cc: ozawa@ongs.co.jp, dkirhlarov@oilspace.com, Daichi GOTO , freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de, meianoite@gmail.com, kris@obsecurity.org, Alexander@Leidinger.net Subject: [ANN] unionfs patchset-13 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:40:34 -0000 Hi Guys! It is my pleasure and honor to announce the availability of the unionfs patchset-13. Patchset-13: For 7-current http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p13.diff For 6.x http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p13.diff Changes in unionfs-p13.diff - Fixed a bug that leads a panic around compat2 just after VOP_RENAME call. The documents of those unionfs patches: http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/ (English) http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/index-ja.html (Japanese) Guys taking some panic troubles with p12, please try the p13 :) We think that p13 is getting be no-panic code quality. Thanks -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 31 09:57:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4753F16A422; Wed, 31 May 2006 09:57:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B891D43D55; Wed, 31 May 2006 09:57:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669322086; Wed, 31 May 2006 11:57:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: none X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55212082; Wed, 31 May 2006 11:57:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9D55E33CAD; Wed, 31 May 2006 11:57:35 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Daichi GOTO References: <43E5D052.3020207@freebsd.org> <43E656C7.8040302@freesbie.org> <43E6D5C8.4050405@freebsd.org> <43E71485.5040901@freesbie.org> <43E73330.8070101@freebsd.org> <43EB4C00.2030101@freebsd.org> <4417DD8D.3050201@freebsd.org> <4433CA53.5050000@freebsd.org> <444E13BA.8050902@freebsd.org> <4475C119.1020305@freebsd.org> <447C919B.20303@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 11:57:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <447C919B.20303@freebsd.org> (Daichi GOTO's message of "Wed, 31 May 2006 03:40:27 +0900") Message-ID: <86bqteikj4.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:38:49 +0000 Cc: ozawa@ongs.co.jp, dkirhlarov@oilspace.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, meianoite@gmail.com, Alexander@Leidinger.net Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-13 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:57:46 -0000 Daichi GOTO writes: > It is my pleasure and honor to announce the availability of > the unionfs patchset-13. Will you commit it already? :) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 31 11:38:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09DD16A4A9; Wed, 31 May 2006 11:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EBC43D46; Wed, 31 May 2006 11:38:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5E4E4.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.228.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4VBbKDB092969; Wed, 31 May 2006 13:37:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4VBcF20011884; Wed, 31 May 2006 13:38:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 31 May 2006 13:38:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20060531133814.acykloyqhkcccg80@netchild.homeip.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:38:14 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?b?U23DuHJncmF2?= References: <43E5D052.3020207@freebsd.org> <43E656C7.8040302@freesbie.org> <43E6D5C8.4050405@freebsd.org> <43E71485.5040901@freesbie.org> <43E73330.8070101@freebsd.org> <43EB4C00.2030101@freebsd.org> <4417DD8D.3050201@freebsd.org> <4433CA53.5050000@freebsd.org> <444E13BA.8050902@freebsd.org> <4475C119.1020305@freebsd.org> <447C919B.20303@freebsd.org> <86bqteikj4.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86bqteikj4.fsf@xps.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1) / FreeBSD-4.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:43:25 +0000 Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, ozawa@ongs.co.jp, dkirhlarov@oilspace.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Daichi GOTO , freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, meianoite@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-13 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 11:38:37 -0000 Quoting Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav (from Wed, 31 May 2006 =20 11:57:35 +0200): > Daichi GOTO writes: >> It is my pleasure and honor to announce the availability of >> the unionfs patchset-13. > > Will you commit it already? :) He's not a src-committer and he prefers to let a src-committer do it. =20 I offered to commit it, but so far either the man-page was missing =20 (what's the status of this?) or a bug showed up. If everyone is happy with the current patchset (if the man-page is =20 still missing, we may agree that it can be delivered at a later time), =20 I can try to get time to do it at the weekend (but feel free to beat =20 me in committing it). Bye, Alexander. --=20 Selling GoodYear Eagle F1 235/40ZR18, 2x 4mm + 2x 5mm, ~150 EUR you have to pick it up between Germany/Saarland and Luxembourg/Capellen http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137 From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 31 16:52:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DC816AADE for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 16:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoemix@harmless.hu) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (marvin.harmless.hu [195.56.55.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F035C43D60 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 16:51:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phoemix@harmless.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marvin (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFBC20001CB for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 18:51:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (marvin [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03699-01 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 18:51:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by marvin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 44C1720001C9; Wed, 31 May 2006 18:51:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:51:57 +0200 To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060531165157.GA14357@marvin.harmless.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: phoemix@harmless.hu (Gergely CZUCZY) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at harmless.hu Subject: xfs ro support in -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 16:52:07 -0000 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline hello i found the xfs module that makes XFS readonly support in -CURRENT, however i found no mount_xfs utility. my questions is how do i mount a filesystem using this readonly XFS support? Bye, Gergely Czuczy mailto: gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu PGP: http://phoemix.harmless.hu/phoemix.pgp Weenies test. Geniuses solve problems that arise. --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEfcmtbBsEN0U7BV0RAq7bAKCcVvXPyIGJnu+HLfVYW3zvQV0i8ACfbeUC CzoQlpM3apDlLBS/x+pBc1U= =P0n+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 31 17:33:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4781D16A47D for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 17:33:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25C543D48 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 17:33:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4VHWwkg082971; Wed, 31 May 2006 12:32:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <447DD34D.6070102@centtech.com> Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:33:01 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060506) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gergely CZUCZY References: <20060531165157.GA14357@marvin.harmless.hu> In-Reply-To: <20060531165157.GA14357@marvin.harmless.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1501/Wed May 31 05:23:26 2006 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfs ro support in -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:33:10 -0000 Gergely CZUCZY wrote: > hello > > i found the xfs module that makes XFS readonly support in -CURRENT, > however i found no mount_xfs utility. my questions is how do i mount a filesystem > using this readonly XFS support? > > Bye, > > Gergely Czuczy Did you try mount -t xfs -oro mountpoint Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 31 18:25:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AEE16B6CD for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 18:25:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7608B43D77 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 18:25:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp2.macomnet.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4VIPPcW058329; Wed, 31 May 2006 22:25:25 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 22:25:25 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Eric Anderson In-Reply-To: <447DD34D.6070102@centtech.com> Message-ID: <20060531222504.U23820@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <20060531165157.GA14357@marvin.harmless.hu> <447DD34D.6070102@centtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfs ro support in -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:25:36 -0000 On Wed, 31 May 2006, 12:33-0500, Eric Anderson wrote: > Gergely CZUCZY wrote: > > hello > > > > i found the xfs module that makes XFS readonly support in -CURRENT, > > however i found no mount_xfs utility. my questions is how do i mount a > > filesystem > > using this readonly XFS support? > > > > Bye, > > > > Gergely Czuczy > > > Did you try mount -t xfs -oro mountpoint Take a look at ports/sysutils/xfsprogs also. -- Maxim Konovalov From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 31 18:32:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C7016ADC6 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 18:32:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoemix@harmless.hu) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (marvin.harmless.hu [195.56.55.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6F543D55 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 18:31:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phoemix@harmless.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marvin (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D83A20001CB; Wed, 31 May 2006 20:31:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (marvin [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28400-09; Wed, 31 May 2006 20:31:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by marvin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 00A7A20001C9; Wed, 31 May 2006 20:31:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 20:31:51 +0200 To: Maxim Konovalov Message-ID: <20060531183151.GA30675@marvin.harmless.hu> References: <20060531165157.GA14357@marvin.harmless.hu> <447DD34D.6070102@centtech.com> <20060531222504.U23820@mp2.macomnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060531222504.U23820@mp2.macomnet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: phoemix@harmless.hu (Gergely CZUCZY) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at harmless.hu Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfs ro support in -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:32:16 -0000 --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:25:25PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2006, 12:33-0500, Eric Anderson wrote: >=20 > > Gergely CZUCZY wrote: > > > hello > > > > > > i found the xfs module that makes XFS readonly support in -CURRENT, > > > however i found no mount_xfs utility. my questions is how do i mount a > > > filesystem > > > using this readonly XFS support? > > > > > > Bye, > > > > > > Gergely Czuczy > > > > > > Did you try mount -t xfs -oro mountpoint >=20 > Take a look at ports/sysutils/xfsprogs also. thanks, now it's working, i already have xfsprogs i'm doing some data recovery from a harddisk, currently hoping that gpart will succeed :) Bye, Gergely Czuczy mailto: gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu PGP: http://phoemix.harmless.hu/phoemix.pgp Weenies test. Geniuses solve problems that arise. --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEfeEXbBsEN0U7BV0RAlHKAKCIDWt8xvgZMXgUuydBMVzsdrMWMwCfQNV/ HB5yGw7A3Bq47M0iS6XiG44= =vCWf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 31 18:36:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FBA16B647 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 18:36:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodrigc@crodrigues.org) Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (sccrmhc15.comcast.net [63.240.77.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDA843D46 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 18:36:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rodrigc@crodrigues.org) Received: from c-24-147-19-128.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (c-71-233-168-2.hsd1.ma.comcast.net[71.233.168.2](misconfigured sender)) by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with ESMTP id <2006053118360401500717lue>; Wed, 31 May 2006 18:36:04 +0000 Received: from c-24-147-19-128.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c-24-147-19-128.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4VIa4pQ006470; Wed, 31 May 2006 14:36:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rodrigc@c-24-147-19-128.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) Received: (from rodrigc@localhost) by c-24-147-19-128.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (8.13.6/8.13.1/Submit) id k4VIa4O7006469; Wed, 31 May 2006 14:36:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rodrigc) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:36:04 -0400 From: Craig Rodrigues To: Gergely CZUCZY Message-ID: <20060531183604.GA6452@crodrigues.org> References: <20060531165157.GA14357@marvin.harmless.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060531165157.GA14357@marvin.harmless.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfs ro support in -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:36:12 -0000 On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 06:51:57PM +0200, Gergely CZUCZY wrote: > hello > > i found the xfs module that makes XFS readonly support in -CURRENT, > however i found no mount_xfs utility. my questions is how do i mount a filesystem > using this readonly XFS support? No mount_xfs utility is required in CURRENT. If you have an XFS partition on /dev/ad0s4, then you can do: mount -t xfs /dev/ad0s4 /mnt If you download the sysutils/xfsprogs port, then you can make an xfs partition with: mkfs.xfs /dev/ad0s4 /mnt You can't write though yet. :) -- Craig Rodrigues rodrigc@crodrigues.org From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 31 18:25:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF3E16B762 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 18:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meianoite@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC96043D76 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 18:25:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from meianoite@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id m7so89958nzf for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 11:25:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dEwMDcX89hPBeNIvwzfSre7xw6tmAgXrbTVoUPXqgyVR+SCqcl5Cmu9b4S9DnKq3b4U4w2n/S2lR4QHP49xGZadUraVPs9w/unft6kZMghuBAcdBm7AT6qR1pbJNC1Uq94CYxt1xUny7Gb7gPPLF+wblG9YMzyYe6I9aPsnQexs= Received: by 10.36.148.2 with SMTP id v2mr579477nzd; Wed, 31 May 2006 11:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.113.7 with HTTP; Wed, 31 May 2006 11:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2ad73a0605311125h7ac8a927t33bbfadf9fe18c33@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:25:37 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Braga?=" To: "Alexander Leidinger" In-Reply-To: <20060531133814.acykloyqhkcccg80@netchild.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43E73330.8070101@freebsd.org> <43EB4C00.2030101@freebsd.org> <4417DD8D.3050201@freebsd.org> <4433CA53.5050000@freebsd.org> <444E13BA.8050902@freebsd.org> <4475C119.1020305@freebsd.org> <447C919B.20303@freebsd.org> <86bqteikj4.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060531133814.acykloyqhkcccg80@netchild.homeip.net> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:42:31 +0000 Cc: ozawa@ongs.co.jp, dkirhlarov@oilspace.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Daichi GOTO , freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-13 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:25:52 -0000 On 5/31/06, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > If everyone is happy with the current patchset (if the man-page is > still missing, we may agree that it can be delivered at a later time), > I can try to get time to do it at the weekend (but feel free to beat > me in committing it). Hello, I haven't been able to test whether the new patchset handles the bug I reported to Mr. Daichi Goto but so far haven't received a reply. Perhaps my message got lost somewhere, so I thought it would be a good idea to report this bug again. I diff'ed -p11 against -p12 (not yet against -p13) but haven't been able to determine myself if this bug got fixed. To foreign a code for me to understand as I have no background on the inner workings of FreeBSD's VFS, so I can't realy tell if the differences were sufficient to fix the bug. Here's a reprint of my bug report when -p11 was the newest available versio= n. A post scriptum to the original message: The buggy behaviour won't affect the host system, but the jail could well be compromised. I also have this feeling that ACLs also aren't respected inside jails or can be overwritten as easily as shown below Thanks, Andr=E9 ---------------------- 8< ---------------------- Hi, Once again, thank you for your patch. I believe I have found a bug: If a file or directory has non-default flags and this directory is mounted below a target point, the resulting union will not preserve the directory flags. Worse, it will appear as if the file flags are preserved, but they are not and as soon as a file that should not be modified gets modified, the flags are reset to the default state on the union mount. This could pose a *serious* security breach for people running jails rooted on unionfs mounts, like I intended to. Test case: (discrepancies are marked by a line containing "**** NOTICE" and aligned to fixed-length font display) # cd /tmp # mkdir -p test/a test/b/bb test/b/cc # touch test/b/cc/dd # chflags schg test/b/bb/ # chflags uappnd test/b/cc/dd # ls -Rlo total 2 drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 test ./test: total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 a drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 b ./test/a: total 0 ./test/b: total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel schg 512 Apr 29 08:12 bb **** NOTICE 1a ^^^^ **** drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 cc ./test/b/bb: total 0 ./test/b/cc: total 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uappnd 0 Apr 29 08:12 dd **** NOTICE 2a ^^^^^^ **** # echo ee >test/b/cc/dd test/b/cc/dd: Operation not permitted. # echo ee >> test/b/cc/dd **** NOTICE: this is the intended behavior for the 'uappnd' flag **** # cat test/b/cc/dd ee # # mount_unionfs -c transparent -b test/b test/a # ls -Rlo total 2 drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 test ./test: total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 a drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 b ./test/a: total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 bb **** NOTICE 1b ^^^ **** drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 cc ./test/a/bb: total 0 ./test/a/cc: total 2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uappnd 3 Apr 29 08:15 dd **** NOTICE 2b (LOOKS OK) ^^^^^^ **** ./test/b: total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel schg 512 Apr 29 08:12 bb drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 cc ./test/b/bb: total 0 ./test/b/cc: total 2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uappnd 3 Apr 29 08:15 dd # echo ff > test/a/cc/dd # cat test/a/cc/dd ff **** NOTICE: very wrong behavior for the 'uappnd' flag! **** # ls -lo test/a/cc/dd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 3 Apr 29 08:20 test/a/cc/dd **** NOTICE 2c (NO FLAG!) ^^^ **** # echo gg >test/b/cc/hh # chflags schg test/b/cc/hh # rm test/b/cc/hh override rw-r--r-- root/wheel schg for test/b/cc/hh? yes rm: test/b/cc/hh: Operation not permitted **** NOTICE 3a ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ **** # ls -lo test/a/cc/hh -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel schg 3 Apr 29 08:24 test/a/cc/hh **** NOTICE 3b ^^^^ **** # rm test/a/cc/hh override rw-r--r-- root/wheel schg for test/a/cc/hh? yes **** NOTICE 3c (NO ERROR!) **** # ls -lo test/a/cc/ total 2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 3 Apr 29 08:20 dd **** NOTICE 3d (the file is gone despite immutable flags seemingly set!) *= *** End of test case It makes no difference to specify '-c tradicional'. I skimmed over the patch code and have noticed no file flags or director[y flags] are indeed [ever] copied to the shadow files. [Edit: spelling] I'd really appreciate if you could fix that for the patch version 12. Thank you very much! Andr=E9 From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 07:54:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46CB16A537; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 07:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from natial.ongs.co.jp (natial.ongs.co.jp [202.216.232.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA5F43D49; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 07:54:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (dullmdaler.ongs.co.jp [202.216.232.62]) by natial.ongs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376A0244C3A; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:54:17 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <447E9D26.3060800@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:54:14 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060424) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Braga?= References: <43E73330.8070101@freebsd.org> <43EB4C00.2030101@freebsd.org> <4417DD8D.3050201@freebsd.org> <4433CA53.5050000@freebsd.org> <444E13BA.8050902@freebsd.org> <4475C119.1020305@freebsd.org> <447C919B.20303@freebsd.org> <86bqteikj4.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060531133814.acykloyqhkcccg80@netchild.homeip.net> <2ad73a0605311125h7ac8a927t33bbfadf9fe18c33@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2ad73a0605311125h7ac8a927t33bbfadf9fe18c33@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:54:44 +0000 Cc: ozawa@ongs.co.jp, dkirhlarov@oilspace.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= , Daichi GOTO , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-13 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 07:54:26 -0000 André Braga wrote: > A post scriptum to the original message: > The buggy behaviour won't affect the host system, but the jail could > well be compromised. I also have this feeling that ACLs also aren't > respected inside jails or can be overwritten as easily as shown below > > Thanks, > André for all folks who have deep consideration of FS: We do not know well around MAC and ACL. Someone knows well around those, please teach us. Does MAC have a information of schg of chflags? for all folks who have deep consideration of FS: part2 Yeah, it is possible to make capability for setting the ALC and MAC information to the upper layer of the unionfs. With that, we must consider the policy that what information should be copied to shadow file when it makes shadow file. Without the policy, we cannot make it. We want to know your opinions if you have deep consideration of it. What do you make of it? -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 12:37:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1F116B79B; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 12:37:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4636E43D45; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 12:37:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE56046BDB; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 08:37:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 13:37:10 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Braga?= In-Reply-To: <2ad73a0605311125h7ac8a927t33bbfadf9fe18c33@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060601133410.M37536@fledge.watson.org> References: <43E73330.8070101@freebsd.org> <43EB4C00.2030101@freebsd.org> <4417DD8D.3050201@freebsd.org> <4433CA53.5050000@freebsd.org> <444E13BA.8050902@freebsd.org> <4475C119.1020305@freebsd.org> <447C919B.20303@freebsd.org> <86bqteikj4.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060531133814.acykloyqhkcccg80@netchild.homeip.net> <2ad73a0605311125h7ac8a927t33bbfadf9fe18c33@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-683816645-1149165430=:37536" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 12:57:57 +0000 Cc: ozawa@ongs.co.jp, dkirhlarov@oilspace.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= , Daichi GOTO , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-13 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 12:37:20 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-683816645-1149165430=:37536 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Wed, 31 May 2006, Andr=E9 Braga wrote: > A post scriptum to the original message: > > The buggy behaviour won't affect the host system, but the jail could well= be=20 > compromised. I also have this feeling that ACLs also aren't respected ins= ide=20 > jails or can be overwritten as easily as shown below By "ACLs also aren't respected inside jails", do you mean, "ACLs don't work= in=20 jail", or do you mean, "ACLs don't work with unionfs"? They are believed= =20 firmly to work with jail, and if you have evidence to the contrary, a PR=20 pointer would be greatly appreciated so it can be investigated. I don't know much about the behavior of unionfs, but if VOP_ACCESS is passe= d=20 down properly through the stack, then ACLs should be implemented. There mi= ght=20 be problems if two file systems are stacked and have different access contr= ol=20 models. I don't know enough about unionfs to reason about how it does beha= ve,=20 or should behave. Unionfs seems to violate the notion of POLA, so I'm not= =20 sure how much POLA will help :-). Robert N M Watson > > Thanks, > Andr=E9 > > ---------------------- 8< ---------------------- > > Hi, > > Once again, thank you for your patch. > > I believe I have found a bug: > > If a file or directory has non-default flags and this directory is > mounted below a target point, the resulting union will not preserve > the directory flags. Worse, it will appear as if the file flags are > preserved, but they are not and as soon as a file that should not be > modified gets modified, the flags are reset to the default state on > the union mount. This could pose a *serious* security breach for > people running jails rooted on unionfs mounts, like I intended to. > > Test case: > (discrepancies are marked by a line containing "**** NOTICE" and > aligned to fixed-length font display) > > # cd /tmp > # mkdir -p test/a test/b/bb test/b/cc > # touch test/b/cc/dd > # chflags schg test/b/bb/ > # chflags uappnd test/b/cc/dd > # ls -Rlo > total 2 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 test > > ./test: > total 4 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 a > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 b > > ./test/a: > total 0 > > ./test/b: > total 4 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel schg 512 Apr 29 08:12 bb > **** NOTICE 1a ^^^^ **** > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 cc > > ./test/b/bb: > total 0 > > ./test/b/cc: > total 0 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uappnd 0 Apr 29 08:12 dd > **** NOTICE 2a ^^^^^^ **** > # echo ee >test/b/cc/dd > test/b/cc/dd: Operation not permitted. > # echo ee >> test/b/cc/dd > **** NOTICE: this is the intended behavior for the 'uappnd' flag **** > # cat test/b/cc/dd > ee > # > # mount_unionfs -c transparent -b test/b test/a > # ls -Rlo > total 2 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 test > > ./test: > total 4 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 a > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 b > > ./test/a: > total 4 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 bb > **** NOTICE 1b ^^^ **** > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 cc > > ./test/a/bb: > total 0 > > ./test/a/cc: > total 2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uappnd 3 Apr 29 08:15 dd > **** NOTICE 2b (LOOKS OK) ^^^^^^ **** > ./test/b: > total 4 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel schg 512 Apr 29 08:12 bb > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Apr 29 08:12 cc > > ./test/b/bb: > total 0 > > ./test/b/cc: > total 2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uappnd 3 Apr 29 08:15 dd > # echo ff > test/a/cc/dd > # cat test/a/cc/dd > ff > **** NOTICE: very wrong behavior for the 'uappnd' flag! **** > # ls -lo test/a/cc/dd > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 3 Apr 29 08:20 test/a/cc/dd > **** NOTICE 2c (NO FLAG!) ^^^ **** > # echo gg >test/b/cc/hh > # chflags schg test/b/cc/hh > # rm test/b/cc/hh > override rw-r--r-- root/wheel schg for test/b/cc/hh? yes > rm: test/b/cc/hh: Operation not permitted > **** NOTICE 3a ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ **** > # ls -lo test/a/cc/hh > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel schg 3 Apr 29 08:24 test/a/cc/hh > **** NOTICE 3b ^^^^ **** > # rm test/a/cc/hh > override rw-r--r-- root/wheel schg for test/a/cc/hh? yes > **** NOTICE 3c (NO ERROR!) **** > # ls -lo test/a/cc/ > total 2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 3 Apr 29 08:20 dd > **** NOTICE 3d (the file is gone despite immutable flags seemingly set!)= =20 > **** > > End of test case > > It makes no difference to specify '-c tradicional'. > > I skimmed over the patch code and have noticed no file flags or > director[y flags] are indeed [ever] copied to the shadow files. > [Edit: spelling] > > I'd really appreciate if you could fix that for the patch version 12. > > Thank you very much! > Andr=E9 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > --0-683816645-1149165430=:37536-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 17:13:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A3516A43A for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 17:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: from kiwi-computer.com (megan.kiwi-computer.com [63.224.10.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F65343D53 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 17:13:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: (qmail 59944 invoked by uid 2001); 1 Jun 2006 17:13:07 -0000 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 12:13:07 -0500 From: "Rick C. Petty" To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com Message-ID: <20060601171307.GA59676@megan.kiwi-computer.com> References: <447E524E.7050400@centtech.com> <20060601034133.18927.qmail@web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060601034133.18927.qmail@web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is anyone working on a port of ZFS to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 17:13:17 -0000 [Moving this discussion to freebsd-fs, since it's more appropriate there] On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 05:41:33AM +0200, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: > > I'm afraid adding write support to XFS or reiserfs is not easy, and then > there's the license issue. ZFS might not have the best license either but we > can work with it. Apple's updated HFS license is also something that could be > worked with but Apple is interested in ZFS too so it must have something > interesting ;-). Speaking of HFS, I'm disappointed that this hasn't been imported or at least looked at lately. I'd been using the method posted at: http://people.freebsd.org/~yar/hfs/ since early 2003, but due the major VFS changes in 6.0, I haven't been able to compile it or even get my hacks working. I'm not aware of the updated HFS license, but I know the code is available at: http://cvs.opendarwin.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/xnu/bsd/ My attempts at getting both HFS and AFS (ports/arla) working in 6.0 & 6.1 have been futile. Due to the lack of good documentation of the VFS subsystem (especially in the areas of the 6.x removals) and my continued frustrations trying to port both file systems, I've given up. Maybe if I magically find time this summer... Anyone else working on these? They should be easier/quicker to fix than trying to port ZFS, but the more FS support, the better! -- Rick C. Petty From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 19:08:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9651816AC6E for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 19:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8069C43D6D for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 19:08:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2A546C0C; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 15:08:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 20:08:20 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: "Rick C. Petty" In-Reply-To: <20060601171307.GA59676@megan.kiwi-computer.com> Message-ID: <20060601200407.U37536@fledge.watson.org> References: <447E524E.7050400@centtech.com> <20060601034133.18927.qmail@web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060601171307.GA59676@megan.kiwi-computer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com, Hugo Meiland Subject: Re: Is anyone working on a port of ZFS to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 19:08:33 -0000 On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Rick C. Petty wrote: > [Moving this discussion to freebsd-fs, since it's more appropriate there] > > My attempts at getting both HFS and AFS (ports/arla) working in 6.0 & 6.1 > have been futile. Due to the lack of good documentation of the VFS > subsystem (especially in the areas of the 6.x removals) and my continued > frustrations trying to port both file systems, I've given up. Maybe if I > magically find time this summer... > > Anyone else working on these? They should be easier/quicker to fix than > trying to port ZFS, but the more FS support, the better! I had a conversation with Hugo Meiland at BSDCan about getting Arla support fixed up for FreeBSD, and in particular, and possibly importing the Arla nnpfs kernel module so that it gets updated for VFS changes along with the other kernel file systems. I've recently gotten him set up with a FreeBSD.org Perforce account to help facilitate that. One of the reasons why VFS documentation is lagging currently is that the retrofit of the VFS architecture for SMP isn't done. There are still significant improvements being made in 7.x, much of which will make it to 6.x, and as we begin to see more MPSAFE file systems and SMP-oriented file system development, I think there will be more. You may have noticed the recent commit to make the FreeBSD NFS client code MPSAFE in 7.x. My hope is that after things settle down some more in the next 6-8 months, we can see a more serious effort to document the VFS APIs in their post-SMP state. Doing too much before then would probably be premature. I've added Hugo to the CC line, perhaps he can comment on the current status of the Arla update work. Robert N M Watson From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 22:02:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C243416A4C9; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 22:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@islandnet.com) Received: from outgoing.islandnet.com (outgoing.islandnet.com [199.175.106.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83ED543D46; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 22:02:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@islandnet.com) Received: from [199.175.106.57] (helo=cluster.islandnet.com) by outgoing.islandnet.com with ESMTP id 1FlvFh-000Lmy-qI ; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:02:49 -0700 Received: from [199.175.106.221] (port=24616 helo=helpdesk.islandnet.com) by cluster08.islandnet.com with SMTP id 1FlvFl-000Pin-QJ ; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:02:53 -0700 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 15:02:53 -0700 Message-ID: <447f640d-11663@helpdesk.islandnet.com> From: Mark Morley To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org,freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Content-type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Helpdesk Webmail (http://helpdesk.islandnet.com) X-Originating-IP: [199.175.106.243] X-GeoIP: CA Canada Cc: Subject: NFS processes locking up!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Morley List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:03:01 -0000 Hi all, We have an NFS server (amd64) running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE. It serves a dozen or so clients which are a mix of FreeBSD 4.11 and 6.1-STABLE. All NFS traffic is on a dedicated gigabit switched network. Periodically we have a problem where it will stop serving up files. Running 'ps' on the server shows a number of processes stuck in the 'D' state -- "a process in disk (or other short term, uninter-ruptible) wait". Usually this includes all the nfsd processes as well as any others that are trying to access the same disk drive. Any commands issued like 'du', 'sync', etc. go into the same state and never exit. It is impossible to kill any of these processes. We can pretty much force this to happen by running a large 'find' or something similar on the exported file system, although it will happen itself eventually without any such commands being run. Our only option (as far as we can tell) is to reboot the server, which results in a very long fsck period (it's over a terrabyte of disk space). This doesn't seem to be a hardware issue. This is a brand new server in all respects (all new hardware, new RAID) and we saw the exact same issue on the machine that it replaced (which was running 4.11 on i386). Any thoughts on this? Any more info I should provide? Mark -- Mark Morley Owner / Administrator Islandnet.com From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 23:35:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE79F16AB4D; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:35:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hwypdjc@email.de) Received: from email.de (c-69-249-254-11.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.249.254.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A510643D7F; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:34:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hwypdjc@email.de) Message-ID: <55E3263F.EA9FF20@email.de> Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 03:17:43 +0300 From: "Genaro" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: cvs@freebsd.org, cokane@freebsd.org, tmclaugh@freebsd.org, dmlb@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: my dream come true X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Genaro List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:35:36 -0000 Hello my dear friend I was looking through the web few weeks ago and found your profile. Now I decided to email you to get to knoaw you better. I am coming to your country in few weeks and thought may be we can meet each other. I am pretty looking girl. I am 25. Do not reply to this address a directly. Email me back at kb@freemailserv.com From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 23:39:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7857916B725; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:39:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from elise.stf.rewt.org.uk (elise.stf.rewt.org.uk [82.152.108.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B80543D68; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:38:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from [82.152.108.166] (im.a.raver.not.a.fucking.drug-addict.be [82.152.108.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by elise.stf.rewt.org.uk (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k51NctJd068131 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:38:56 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Message-ID: <447F7A8F.9040107@joeholden.co.uk> Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:38:55 +0100 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <55E3263F.EA9FF20@email.de> In-Reply-To: <55E3263F.EA9FF20@email.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=13A6D1E7; url=http://www.joeholden.co.uk/pubkey.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig06530D6F4E905AB917781476" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_1,ALL_TRUSTED, AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on elise.stf.rewt.org.uk Cc: cvs@freebsd.org, re-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: my dream come true X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: joe@joeholden.co.uk List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:39:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig06530D6F4E905AB917781476 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Genaro wrote: > Hello my dear friend > I was looking through the web few weeks ago and found=20 > your profile. Now I decided to email you to get to knoaw > you better. I am coming to your country in few weeks > and thought may be we can meet each other. I am pretty > looking girl. I am 25. Do not reply to this address a > directly. Email me back at kb@freemailserv.com > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > =20 =2E.. Why was this even allowed on the list? My Spam filters say no. Thanks, Joe --------------enig06530D6F4E905AB917781476 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEf3qQdQJXshOm0ecRAt5hAJ9Kp+TKg3cjwfZbFKHtNzuohlCAJQCfcDfU Zfji/XX8FaB08H8GVJYSYjc= =ypBa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig06530D6F4E905AB917781476-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 23:49:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453B016A530; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:49:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003D543D45; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:49:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A461A4E87; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40EBF514E7; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 19:49:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 19:49:07 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Joe Holden Message-ID: <20060601234906.GA39283@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <55E3263F.EA9FF20@email.de> <447F7A8F.9040107@joeholden.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <447F7A8F.9040107@joeholden.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs@freebsd.org, re-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: my dream come true X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:49:14 -0000 --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:38:55AM +0100, Joe Holden wrote: > Genaro wrote: > > Hello my dear friend > > I was looking through the web few weeks ago and found=20 > > your profile. Now I decided to email you to get to knoaw > > you better. I am coming to your country in few weeks > > and thought may be we can meet each other. I am pretty > > looking girl. I am 25. Do not reply to this address a > > directly. Email me back at kb@freemailserv.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > =20 > ... >=20 > Why was this even allowed on the list? My Spam filters say no. No spam filter is 100% effective. The thing to realise is that freebsd.org gets at least a spam per second the last time I checked, so the filters in place really are very good. Besides, your spam filter caught it, so what's the issue? Kris --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEf3zyWry0BWjoQKURAioQAKD2nFtuePlit+ihuOAlOhuw20qcmACfSG/6 fOsL9hdfZDXV/b4IlmLxoiY= =VmLA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 23:50:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173D816A69B; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:50:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from elise.stf.rewt.org.uk (elise.stf.rewt.org.uk [82.152.108.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F5943D48; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:50:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from [82.152.108.166] (im.a.raver.not.a.fucking.drug-addict.be [82.152.108.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by elise.stf.rewt.org.uk (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k51NoU8E068321 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:50:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Message-ID: <447F7D47.1090405@joeholden.co.uk> Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:50:31 +0100 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <55E3263F.EA9FF20@email.de> <447F7A8F.9040107@joeholden.co.uk> <20060601234906.GA39283@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060601234906.GA39283@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=13A6D1E7; url=http://www.joeholden.co.uk/pubkey.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFE2280742073A7F6F8138D33" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_1,ALL_TRUSTED, AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on elise.stf.rewt.org.uk Cc: cvs@freebsd.org, re-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: my dream come true X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: joe@joeholden.co.uk List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:50:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFE2280742073A7F6F8138D33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:38:55AM +0100, Joe Holden wrote: > =20 >> Genaro wrote: >> =20 >>> Hello my dear friend >>> I was looking through the web few weeks ago and found=20 >>> your profile. Now I decided to email you to get to knoaw >>> you better. I am coming to your country in few weeks >>> and thought may be we can meet each other. I am pretty >>> looking girl. I am 25. Do not reply to this address a >>> directly. Email me back at kb@freemailserv.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"= >>> =20 >>> =20 >> ... >> >> Why was this even allowed on the list? My Spam filters say no. >> =20 > > No spam filter is 100% effective. The thing to realise is that > freebsd.org gets at least a spam per second the last time I checked, > so the filters in place really are very good. > > Besides, your spam filter caught it, so what's the issue? > > Kris > =20 It noticed it, but obviously it was whitelisted as i've posted to the lists etc, generally not a good idea to dump half the list into spam fold= er. Thanks, Joe --------------enigFE2280742073A7F6F8138D33 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEf31HdQJXshOm0ecRApGXAJ0YSzCKSJYl3PwBRSSGJqroLqH3+ACePwAq LzdlCF6iCHfGPU3NRewKQ2o= =9kpq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFE2280742073A7F6F8138D33-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 23:54:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990B016AAA0; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F93543D4C; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:54:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9561A4E87; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90A93514E7; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 19:54:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 19:54:06 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Joe Holden Message-ID: <20060601235406.GA39385@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <55E3263F.EA9FF20@email.de> <447F7A8F.9040107@joeholden.co.uk> <20060601234906.GA39283@xor.obsecurity.org> <447F7D47.1090405@joeholden.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <447F7D47.1090405@joeholden.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs@freebsd.org, re-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: my dream come true X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:54:09 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:50:31AM +0100, Joe Holden wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:38:55AM +0100, Joe Holden wrote: > > =20 > >> Genaro wrote: > >> =20 > >>> Hello my dear friend > >>> I was looking through the web few weeks ago and found=20 > >>> your profile. Now I decided to email you to get to knoaw > >>> you better. I am coming to your country in few weeks > >>> and thought may be we can meet each other. I am pretty > >>> looking girl. I am 25. Do not reply to this address a > >>> directly. Email me back at kb@freemailserv.com > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> =20 > >>> =20 > >> ... > >> > >> Why was this even allowed on the list? My Spam filters say no. > >> =20 > > > > No spam filter is 100% effective. The thing to realise is that > > freebsd.org gets at least a spam per second the last time I checked, > > so the filters in place really are very good. > > > > Besides, your spam filter caught it, so what's the issue? > > > > Kris > > =20 > It noticed it, but obviously it was whitelisted as i've posted to the > lists etc, generally not a good idea to dump half the list into spam fold= er. Let's not exaggerate the issue please. Kris --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEf34dWry0BWjoQKURAsrQAJ9SavB0BdbKYgYIWhKz6mHnVCHk8gCfUZQz yD1LH3aZvJGm/9zmijrkRaE= =TR6u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 2 01:06:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C17516ADA0; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:06:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929EE43D45; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:06:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5B01A4E8E; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED43A5153E; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:06:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:06:29 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mark Morley Message-ID: <20060602010629.GC40143@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <447f640d-11663@helpdesk.islandnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <447f640d-11663@helpdesk.islandnet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS processes locking up!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:06:32 -0000 --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:02:53PM -0700, Mark Morley wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > We have an NFS server (amd64) running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE. It serves a do= zen > or so clients which are a mix of FreeBSD 4.11 and 6.1-STABLE. All NFS tr= affic > is on a dedicated gigabit switched network. >=20 > Periodically we have a problem where it will stop serving up files. Runn= ing 'ps' > on the server shows a number of processes stuck in the 'D' state -- "a pr= ocess in > disk (or other short term, uninter-ruptible) wait". >=20 > Usually this includes all the nfsd processes as well as any others that a= re trying > to access the same disk drive. Any commands issued like 'du', 'sync', et= c. go into > the same state and never exit. It is impossible to kill any of these pro= cesses. >=20 > We can pretty much force this to happen by running a large 'find' or some= thing > similar on the exported file system, although it will happen itself event= ually > without any such commands being run. >=20 > Our only option (as far as we can tell) is to reboot the server, which re= sults in > a very long fsck period (it's over a terrabyte of disk space). >=20 > This doesn't seem to be a hardware issue. This is a brand new server in = all respects > (all new hardware, new RAID) and we saw the exact same issue on the machi= ne that it > replaced (which was running 4.11 on i386). >=20 > Any thoughts on this? Any more info I should provide? Please post your kernel config. Kris --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEf48VWry0BWjoQKURAmu+AKCnMNtnpRH8lhGPN/k8i4XTS3XS+QCfYYwn IzCpbIuBLLXjJkN0W1siSoU= =F4d3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 2 01:49:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D77216A47A; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:49:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@islandnet.com) Received: from cluster.islandnet.com (cluster.islandnet.com [199.175.106.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF7143D46; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:49:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@islandnet.com) Received: from [199.175.106.221] (port=1101 helo=helpdesk.islandnet.com) by cluster04.islandnet.com with SMTP id 1Flyms-0009j4-DQ ; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:49:18 -0700 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:49:18 -0700 Message-ID: <447f991e-11669@helpdesk.islandnet.com> References: <20060602010629.GC40143@xor.obsecurity.org> From: Mark Morley To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Helpdesk Webmail (http://helpdesk.islandnet.com) X-Originating-IP: [199.175.106.243] X-GeoIP: CA Canada Cc: Subject: Re: NFS processes locking up!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Morley List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:49:19 -0000 > Please post your kernel config. > > Kris Ok, here it is. This server has two em nic's (only one is used though), a single IDE boot disk, and a RAID using an Adaptec 2410SA controller. machine amd64 cpu HAMMER ident CUSTOM makeoptions COPTFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math" #options IPFIREWALL #options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD #options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT options DEVICE_POLLING options HZ=1000 device atapicam #options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel thread preemption options INET # InterNETworking #options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories #options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device #options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client options NFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server #options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT #options NTFS # NT File System #options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem #options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options COMPAT_43 # Needed by COMPAT_LINUX32 options COMPAT_IA32 # Compatible with i386 binaries options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 # Compatible with FreeBSD5 options COMPAT_LINUX32 # Compatible with i386 linux binaries options SCSI_DELAY=5000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev #options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~128k to driver. #options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~215k to driver. options ADAPTIVE_GIANT # Giant mutex is adaptive. # Workarounds for some known-to-be-broken chipsets (nVidia nForce3-Pro150) device atpic # 8259A compatability # Linux 32-bit ABI support options LINPROCFS # Cannot be a module yet. # Bus support. device acpi device pci # Floppy drives #device fdc # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device ataraid # ATA RAID drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives #device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives #device atapist # ATAPI tape drives options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering # SCSI Controllers #device ahc # AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices #device ahd # AHA39320/29320 and onboard AIC79xx devices #device amd # AMD 53C974 (Tekram DC-390(T)) #device isp # Qlogic family #device ispfw # Firmware for QLogic HBAs- normally a module #device mpt # LSI-Logic MPT-Fusion #device ncr # NCR/Symbios Logic #device sym # NCR/Symbios Logic (newer chipsets + those of `ncr') #device trm # Tekram DC395U/UW/F DC315U adapters #device adv # Advansys SCSI adapters #device adw # Advansys wide SCSI adapters #device aic # Adaptec 15[012]x SCSI adapters, AIC-6[23]60. #device bt # Buslogic/Mylex MultiMaster SCSI adapters # SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) #device ch # SCSI media changers #device da # Direct Access (disks) #device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) #device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) # RAID controllers interfaced to the SCSI subsystem #device amr # AMI MegaRAID #device arcmsr # Areca SATA II RAID #device ciss # Compaq Smart RAID 5* #device dpt # DPT Smartcache III, IV - See NOTES for options #device hptmv # Highpoint RocketRAID 182x #device iir # Intel Integrated RAID #device ips # IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID #device mly # Mylex AcceleRAID/eXtremeRAID #device twa # 3ware 9000 series PATA/SATA RAID # RAID controllers device aac # Adaptec FSA RAID device aacp # SCSI passthrough for aac (requires CAM) #device ida # Compaq Smart RAID #device mlx # Mylex DAC960 family #XXX pointer/int warnings #device pst # Promise Supertrak SX6000 #device twe # 3ware ATA RAID # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard #device psm # PS/2 mouse device vga # VGA video card driver #device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc #device agp # support several AGP chipsets # PCCARD (PCMCIA) support # PCMCIA and cardbus bridge support #device cbb # cardbus (yenta) bridge #device pccard # PC Card (16-bit) bus #device cardbus # CardBus (32-bit) bus # Serial (COM) ports #device sio # 8250, 16[45]50 based serial ports # Parallel port #device ppc #device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) #device lpt # Printer #device plip # TCP/IP over parallel #device ppi # Parallel port interface device #device vpo # Requires scbus and da # If you've got a "dumb" serial or parallel PCI card that is # supported by the puc(4) glue driver, uncomment the following # line to enable it (connects to the sio and/or ppc drivers): #device puc # PCI Ethernet NICs. #device de # DEC/Intel DC21x4x (``Tulip'') device em # Intel PRO/1000 adapter Gigabit Ethernet Card #device ixgb # Intel PRO/10GbE Ethernet Card #device txp # 3Com 3cR990 (``Typhoon'') #device vx # 3Com 3c590, 3c595 (``Vortex'') # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these NICs! #device miibus # MII bus support #device bfe # Broadcom BCM440x 10/100 Ethernet #device bge # Broadcom BCM570xx Gigabit Ethernet #device dc # DEC/Intel 21143 and various workalikes #device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558) #device lge # Level 1 LXT1001 gigabit Ethernet #device nge # NatSemi DP83820 gigabit Ethernet #device nve # nVidia nForce MCP on-board Ethernet Networking #device pcn # AMD Am79C97x PCI 10/100(precedence over 'lnc') #device re # RealTek 8139C+/8169/8169S/8110S #device rl # RealTek 8129/8139 #device sf # Adaptec AIC-6915 (``Starfire'') #device sis # Silicon Integrated Systems SiS 900/SiS 7016 #device sk # SysKonnect SK-984x & SK-982x gigabit Ethernet #device ste # Sundance ST201 (D-Link DFE-550TX) #device ti # Alteon Networks Tigon I/II gigabit Ethernet #device tl # Texas Instruments ThunderLAN #device tx # SMC EtherPower II (83c170 ``EPIC'') #device vge # VIA VT612x gigabit Ethernet #device vr # VIA Rhine, Rhine II #device wb # Winbond W89C840F #device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'') # ISA Ethernet NICs. pccard NICs included. #device cs # Crystal Semiconductor CS89x0 NIC # 'device ed' requires 'device miibus' #device ed # NE[12]000, SMC Ultra, 3c503, DS8390 cards #device ex # Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 and Pro/10+ #device ep # Etherlink III based cards #device fe # Fujitsu MB8696x based cards # XXX kvtop brokenness, pointer/int warnings #device lnc # NE2100, NE32-VL Lance Ethernet cards #device sn # SMC's 9000 series of Ethernet chips #device xe # Xircom pccard Ethernet # Wireless NIC cards #device wlan # 802.11 support #device an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs. #device awi # BayStack 660 and others #device ral # Ralink Technology RT2500 wireless NICs. #device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs. # Pseudo devices. device loop # Network loopback device random # Entropy device device ether # Ethernet support #device sl # Kernel SLIP #device ppp # Kernel PPP #device tun # Packet tunnel. device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) #device md # Memory "disks" #device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling #device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) # The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! # Note that 'bpf' is required for DHCP. device bpf # Berkeley packet filter # USB support #device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface #device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface #device ehci # EHCI PCI->USB interface (USB 2.0) #device usb # USB Bus (required) #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices #device ugen # Generic #device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" #device ukbd # Keyboard #device ulpt # Printer #device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da #device ums # Mouse #device ural # Ralink Technology RT2500USB wireless NICs #device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player #device uscanner # Scanners # USB Ethernet, requires miibus #device aue # ADMtek USB Ethernet #device axe # ASIX Electronics USB Ethernet #device cdce # Generic USB over Ethernet #device cue # CATC USB Ethernet #device kue # Kawasaki LSI USB Ethernet #device rue # RealTek RTL8150 USB Ethernet # FireWire support #device firewire # FireWire bus code #device sbp # SCSI over FireWire (Requires scbus and da) #device fwe # Ethernet over FireWire (non-standard!) Mark -- Mark Morley Owner / Administrator Islandnet.com From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 2 01:55:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D6816AE82; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:55:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E424C43D6E; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:55:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900391A4E90; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F1F905168D; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:55:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:55:15 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mark Morley Message-ID: <20060602015515.GA40952@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060602010629.GC40143@xor.obsecurity.org> <447f991e-11669@helpdesk.islandnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <447f991e-11669@helpdesk.islandnet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS processes locking up!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:55:31 -0000 --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:49:18PM -0700, Mark Morley wrote: > > Please post your kernel config. > >=20 > > Kris >=20 > Ok, here it is. This server has two em nic's (only one is used though), > a single IDE boot disk, and a RAID using an Adaptec 2410SA controller. >=20 >=20 > machine amd64 > cpu HAMMER > ident CUSTOM >=20 > makeoptions COPTFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math" Don't use leet meaningless compiler flags, and try again :) Kris --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEf5qCWry0BWjoQKURAmcIAKCJcBVXwFJW2ewgYNZjDOEiVoqEYQCeLLtE U3BuoT5FBXhKBmHiDI0X5cY= =gfQG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 2 01:56:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA4616A525; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:56:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from aaron.protected-networks.net (aaron.protected-networks.net [202.12.127.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7BF43D46; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:56:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aaron.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F499C518; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:56:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from aaron.protected-networks.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aaron.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0308BC49B; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:55:46 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: aaron.protected-networks.net from=imb@protected-networks.net; domainkey=pass Received: from aaron.protected-networks.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aaron.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8413CC425; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:55:45 -0400 (EDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=200509; d=protected-networks.net; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=U5WS2mvgBhqUnbDKK7fG+mLr7bQzjMHaLHq9HILMtEt+3wgWDOX5bd4CU09ixEvuVxRJuR/Vpg91d9JDnYbWw/82EZq7zjmfhAY8JaJrdGv8L7BAkzHVJbRSNYQqnowj; Received: from [192.168.1.11] (c-24-218-147-31.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.218.147.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Iain Michael Butler", Issuer "Protected Networks Certificate Authority" (verified OK)) by aaron.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5549C41A; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:55:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <447F9A9E.80405@protected-networks.net> Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:55:42 -0400 From: Michael Butler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Morley References: <20060602010629.GC40143@xor.obsecurity.org> <447f991e-11669@helpdesk.islandnet.com> In-Reply-To: <447f991e-11669@helpdesk.islandnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS processes locking up!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:56:11 -0000 Mark Morley wrote: > Ok, here it is. This server has two em nic's (only one is used though), > a single IDE boot disk, and a RAID using an Adaptec 2410SA controller. > > > machine amd64 > cpu HAMMER > ident CUSTOM > > makeoptions COPTFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math" > What happens if you revert to the standard way of building kernels? Without this line it becomes "-O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing" -- Michael Butler, CISSP Security Architect Protected Networks http://www.protected-networks.net From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 2 02:24:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6BB16B2AA; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 02:24:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@islandnet.com) Received: from cluster.islandnet.com (cluster.islandnet.com [199.175.106.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE5543D5D; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 02:24:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@islandnet.com) Received: from [199.175.106.221] (port=21410 helo=helpdesk.islandnet.com) by cluster08.islandnet.com with SMTP id 1FlzKS-000JOi-RF ; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 19:24:00 -0700 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 19:24:00 -0700 Message-ID: <447fa140-96fe@helpdesk.islandnet.com> References: <20060602015515.GA40952@xor.obsecurity.org> From: Mark Morley To: Kris Kennaway , Mark Morley , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Helpdesk Webmail (http://helpdesk.islandnet.com) X-Originating-IP: [24.108.70.188] X-GeoIP: CA Canada Cc: Subject: Re: NFS processes locking up!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Morley List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 02:24:01 -0000 > > makeoptions COPTFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math" > > Don't use leet meaningless compiler flags, and try again :) > > Kris D'oh! I don't normally have that in my kernel configs. That carried forward from the old server. I'll remove those and see how it goes. Mark -- Mark Morley Owner / Administrator Islandnet.com From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 2 05:44:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8D716A4C7 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 05:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A67CB43D46 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 05:44:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 77324 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jun 2006 05:44:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=N6TXqyrCZimSskrsJvQxLIyyjKyWCt/UgqqKzduCiKJrK/9eRWxq9fnjJWEdWCLTtMEumxjfpiE4bMgXvzzWVPkS3bh0dxTMsATdl0FY8mNtvBiutP59U8q694A+mCAkMtimKcauCWsqef9/ILVYzRihVm3cVkz/Cl4wSjye7hA= ; Message-ID: <20060602054444.77322.qmail@web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.118.60.210] by web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 07:44:44 CEST Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 07:44:44 +0200 (CEST) From: To: "Rick C. Petty" In-Reply-To: <20060601171307.GA59676@megan.kiwi-computer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is anyone working on a port of ZFS to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:44:45 -0000 --- "Rick C. Petty" ha scritto: > > Speaking of HFS, I'm disappointed that this hasn't been imported or at > least looked at lately. I'd been using the method posted at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yar/hfs/ > Yeah... not blaming anyone though. > since early 2003, but due the major VFS changes in 6.0, I haven't been able > to compile it or even get my hacks working. I'm not aware of the updated > HFS license, but I know the code is available at: > FWIW, the HFS port was made when the current license was APSL 1.1, version 2.0 was created to comply with Stallman's interpretation of what "Free software" is: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/apsl.html the changes are rather good though, plus it's not "copyleft" which is even better. Pedro. Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 2 05:26:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5633516AA27 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 05:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meianoite@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E1F43D4C for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 05:26:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from meianoite@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id m7so434813nzf for ; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:26:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=j7VF7MDcIhhNp+bKHghRZIXe2UeX+yLFwmKt67/7sQpl+XA8ro+p8HXPOPiwHlgW1Kh/goDx40DsFM+sS+l5He7V1ywI81BKhKvUgUtUwJCPhZ61M4H8hfCi1Wg0gd3wIqcRcUlCWhlnA9Zb1mopsMsfvhaN8Zu7R1tVLXLVueU= Received: by 10.36.160.15 with SMTP id i15mr1872922nze; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:26:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.113.7 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 22:26:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2ad73a0606012226h75e03deck653c34f98e98233c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 02:26:55 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Braga?=" To: "Robert Watson" In-Reply-To: <20060601133410.M37536@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4417DD8D.3050201@freebsd.org> <4433CA53.5050000@freebsd.org> <444E13BA.8050902@freebsd.org> <4475C119.1020305@freebsd.org> <447C919B.20303@freebsd.org> <86bqteikj4.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060531133814.acykloyqhkcccg80@netchild.homeip.net> <2ad73a0605311125h7ac8a927t33bbfadf9fe18c33@mail.gmail.com> <20060601133410.M37536@fledge.watson.org> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:29:30 +0000 Cc: ozawa@ongs.co.jp, dkirhlarov@oilspace.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= , Daichi GOTO , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-13 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:26:59 -0000 On 6/1/06, Robert Watson wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2006, Andr=E9 Braga wrote: [snip] > > I also have this feeling that ACLs also aren't respected inside > > jails or can be overwritten as easily as shown below > > By "ACLs also aren't respected inside jails", do you mean, "ACLs don't wo= rk in > jail", or do you mean, "ACLs don't work with unionfs"? They are believed > firmly to work with jail, and if you have evidence to the contrary, a PR > pointer would be greatly appreciated so it can be investigated. s/"jails"/"unionfs with the -b option". Sorry. I intended to use unionfs to keep a single "pristine" tree with nothing but what installword/distribution puts in there, and then layer several other mountpoints on top of it to handle several jails, each to every service my server would offer: web, mail, database, RADIUS, LDAP and user's home directories. This works best by mounting the pristine tree *below* those mountpoints. However, as demonstrated by the test case on my previous message, more sophisticated access control mechanisms, like immutable flags, are not handled by the patchset as per the -p11 version (and I still don't know whether this behaviour was fixed on subsequent patches up to -p13. Would someone enlighten me?). This is why I mentioned that ACLs are probably not correctly handled by "unionfs with the mount below option" either. This has nothing to do with jails per se, but to unionfs. Sorry if I alarmed anyone :) From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 2 14:49:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04ADA16A446; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 14:49:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from wjv.com (fl-65-40-24-38.sta.sprint-hsd.net [65.40.24.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FB643D48; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 14:49:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (localhost.wjv.com [127.0.0.1]) by wjv.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k52EnsCX010973; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:49:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: (from bv@localhost) by bilver.wjv.com (8.13.6/8.13.1/Submit) id k52EnnSr010972; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:49:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bv) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:49:49 -0400 From: Bill Vermillion To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20060602144949.GB10710@wjv.com> References: <55E3263F.EA9FF20@email.de> <447F7A8F.9040107@joeholden.co.uk> <20060601234906.GA39283@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060601234906.GA39283@xor.obsecurity.org> Organization: W.J.Vermillion / Orlando - Winter Park ReplyTo: bv@wjv.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on bilver.wjv.com Cc: cvs@freebsd.org, re-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: my dream come true X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bv@wjv.com List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 14:50:03 -0000 Even though on Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 19:49 Kris Kennaway realized that everything he says should be taken 'cum grano salis', he unhesitatingly continued with this missive: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:38:55AM +0100, Joe Holden wrote: > > Genaro wrote: [quoted spam deleted - wjv] > > Why was this even allowed on the list? My Spam filters say no. > No spam filter is 100% effective. The thing to realise is that > freebsd.org gets at least a spam per second the last time I checked, > so the filters in place really are very good. I wish mine had been that light :-). I was getting in excess of 300,000 spams per 24 hour period on springbreak.com before I made it totally inaccessible - and sort of violating 'net rules. But I had no choice. But the 4.x version of FreeBSD running at that time on a 600Mhz Pentium just took it all in stride. And Kris - thanks for all the hard work you put in to keeping things running. Bill -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 3 02:10:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707D216A423; Sat, 3 Jun 2006 02:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saturnero@freesbie.org) Received: from out2.alice.it (smtp-out03.alice.it [85.37.17.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A254E43D46; Sat, 3 Jun 2006 02:10:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saturnero@freesbie.org) Received: from FBCMMO02.fbc.local ([192.168.68.196]) by out2.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 3 Jun 2006 04:10:26 +0200 Received: from client.alice.it ([192.168.68.142]) by FBCMMO02.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 3 Jun 2006 04:10:26 +0200 Received: from [192.168.99.16] ([87.5.150.129]) by client.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 3 Jun 2006 04:10:25 +0200 Message-ID: <4480EF8B.10101@freesbie.org> Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 04:10:19 +0200 From: Dario Freni User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daichi GOTO References: <43E5D052.3020207@freebsd.org> <43E656C7.8040302@freesbie.org> <43E6D5C8.4050405@freebsd.org> <43E71485.5040901@freesbie.org> <43E73330.8070101@freebsd.org> <43EB4C00.2030101@freebsd.org> <4417DD8D.3050201@freebsd.org> <4433CA53.5050000@freebsd.org> <444E13BA.8050902@freebsd.org> <4475C119.1020305@freebsd.org> <447C919B.20303@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <447C919B.20303@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://www.saturnero.net/saturnero.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0BEAED4E1C135BBC53229187" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2006 02:10:26.0194 (UTC) FILETIME=[E0E36F20:01C686B2] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 03:43:11 +0000 Cc: ozawa@ongs.co.jp, dkirhlarov@oilspace.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, meianoite@gmail.com, freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, Alexander@Leidinger.net Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-13 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:10:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0BEAED4E1C135BBC53229187 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Daichi GOTO ha scritto: > Hi Guys! >=20 > It is my pleasure and honor to announce the availability of > the unionfs patchset-13. >=20 > Patchset-13: > For 7-current > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p13.diff >=20 > For 6.x > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p13.diff >=20 > Changes in unionfs-p13.diff > - Fixed a bug that leads a panic around compat2 just > after VOP_RENAME call. >=20 > The documents of those unionfs patches: >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/ (English) > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/index-ja.html (Japanese) >=20 > Guys taking some panic troubles with p12, please try the p13 :) > We think that p13 is getting be no-panic code quality. Great work! There's a test iso available via torrent: http://torrent.freesbie.org/FreeSBIE-unionfs-i386-20060602.iso.torrent It seems quite stable. Testing is welcome. If it can be considered stable enough, I'll put it in our upcoming release. Please note that this kernel is compiled with debugging options enabled, so it is not good to see if performance are affected or not. I'm going to make a new build with a clean kernel with generic options. Bye, --=20 Dario Freni (saturnero@freesbie.org) FreeSBIE project is looking for a new builder machine! Check http://www.freesbie.org/donations.html --------------enig0BEAED4E1C135BBC53229187 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEgO+Pymi72IiShysRAokJAKC07qFl6pPHM0az4oU4Q37g7N56fACgxuZS WF9ufldQIVtrYD/pWtkdNZE= =J13v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0BEAED4E1C135BBC53229187--