Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 06:57:34 +0000 From: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Cc: Michael Vince <mv@roq.com>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, huang leo <leo.huang.gd@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Benchmark MySQL Performance On FreeBSD And Linux Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0601072257o4d5ec1b3m@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060104125121.701cc504@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <a0cd7c070512151920s67ca6cd6h@mail.gmail.com> <43B7BBEE.5020701@roq.com> <3aaaa3a0601011728j31f1cd5as@mail.gmail.com> <20060104125121.701cc504@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/01/06, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 01:28:07 +0000 > Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > have had mysql lockups until I tinkered with the threading settings. > Libthr > > is the good old threading routine from the 4.x days if I am correct, so > if > > libpthread is indeed unstable under continous heavy load how has it > become > > unoticed by the developer's or has it just been tested in desktop > > environments? > > libc_r is the threading library used in 4.x. > libpthread and libthr are SMP aware threading libraries with a > different internal structure (M:N vs. 1:1). > > Bye, > Alexander. > > -- > 0 and 1. Now what could be so hard about that? > http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net > GPG fingerprint =3D C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 > WL http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/registry/1FZ4DTHQE9PQ8/ref=3Dwl_em_to= / > ah thanks for correcting me, so libthr and libpthread are both new then in 5.x? Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3aaaa3a0601072257o4d5ec1b3m>