From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 29 01:11:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C661D16A420 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 01:11:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pyrosanltd@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6000143D46 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 01:11:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pyrosanltd@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 57so844379wri for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:11:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:to:in-reply-to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=UQA1ivROUoB6mvoilYoVgwXpZyC2Gnqegj1TwgmdNOh13Vt0lxkwbsJCAsKmDdx6EZ5GDNohBxWbq6KTQrys18w/ggzHD83TWUY+mJ3VHMrqeeZT8w15Mv0fiBLfErViBPEWz86Y70mbESvknRidqgnC7k1ikb046bcotABnf8g= Received: by 10.65.152.9 with SMTP id e9mr1283938qbo; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:11:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.10.213? ( [71.136.234.103]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id d5sm1878442qbd.2006.01.28.17.11.30; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:11:31 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:18:16 -0800 Message-Id: <1138497496.844.5.camel@EmPtYShElL> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Gates Subject: mouse on a Ultra5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 01:11:32 -0000 I saw your post and I was looking for the same answer and found it! just add these lines to your Xorg ;) .. Just looked at the date for your post ... if you still don't have it here it is if you already have it .. sorry to bug you Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "MouseSystems" Option "Device" "/dev/cuau3" EndSection From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 29 10:26:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C37016A422; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:26:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0FA43D45; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:26:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2c.sentex.ca [64.7.153.30]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0TAQlL7012928; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:26:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0TAQlq0086884; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:26:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 34B167302F; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:26:47 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20060129102647.34B167302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:26:47 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on clamscanner2 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: Subject: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:26:49 -0000 TB --- 2006-01-29 09:17:55 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2006-01-29 09:17:55 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-01-29 09:17:55 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2006-01-29 09:18:14 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2006-01-29 09:18:14 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_6/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-01-29 09:18:14 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_6 src TB --- 2006-01-29 09:28:16 - building world (CFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2006-01-29 09:28:16 - cd /src TB --- 2006-01-29 09:28:16 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything TB --- 2006-01-29 10:16:26 - generating LINT kernel config TB --- 2006-01-29 10:16:26 - cd /src/sys/sparc64/conf TB --- 2006-01-29 10:16:26 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT TB --- 2006-01-29 10:16:26 - building LINT kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2006-01-29 10:16:26 - cd /src TB --- 2006-01-29 10:16:26 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Sun Jan 29 10:16:26 UTC 2006 >>> stage 1: configuring the kernel >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies >>> stage 3.2: building everything [...] ===> isp (all) cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp.c cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c: In function `isp_target_notify': @/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1272: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_ctio': --param large-function-growth limit reached /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:163: warning: called from here @/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1203: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_atio2e': --param large-function-growth limit reached /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:168: warning: called from here *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/sys/modules/isp. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2006-01-29 10:26:46 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2006-01-29 10:26:46 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2006-01-29 10:26:46 - tinderbox aborted TB --- 0.82 user 3.97 system 4131.92 real From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 30 11:02:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33D616A420 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:02:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7349743D5A for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:02:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0UB2nvk019997 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:02:49 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0UB2mYJ019991 for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:02:48 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:02:48 GMT Message-Id: <200601301102.k0UB2mYJ019991@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:02:51 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2004/09/14] sparc64/71729sparc64 printf in kernel thread causes panic on S o [2004/10/21] sparc64/72962sparc64 [sysinstall] Sysinstall panics on sparc64 o [2005/02/12] sparc64/77417sparc64 [panic] with high usage of cpu when lan u o [2005/04/27] sparc64/80410sparc64 [netgraph] netgraph is causing crash with o [2005/05/11] sparc64/80890sparc64 [panic] kmem_malloc(73728): kmem_map too o [2005/06/23] sparc64/82569sparc64 USB mass storage plug/unplug causes syste o [2005/11/24] sparc64/89486sparc64 firefox and thunderbird is broken on spar o [2006/01/16] sparc64/91882sparc64 Ultra 10 mouse/keyboard o [2006/01/20] sparc64/92033sparc64 [dc] dc(4) issues on Ultra10 9 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2004/10/22] sparc64/72998sparc64 [kernel] [patch] set_mcontext() change sy s [2005/06/26] sparc64/82681sparc64 [dc] dc state messages o [2005/12/13] sparc64/90316sparc64 Keyboard "lock" key lights not working pr o [2006/01/05] sparc64/91334sparc64 FreeBSD 6.0 don't support tftp boot from 4 problems total. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 30 12:27:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5341116A420; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:27:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019A543D6A; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:27:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2c.sentex.ca [64.7.153.30]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0UCRlBJ098184; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:27:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0UCRl05003248; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:27:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id A40537302F; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:27:47 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20060130122747.A40537302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:27:47 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on clamscanner1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: Subject: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:27:55 -0000 TB --- 2006-01-30 11:18:40 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2006-01-30 11:18:40 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-01-30 11:18:40 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2006-01-30 11:19:06 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2006-01-30 11:19:06 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_6/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-01-30 11:19:06 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_6 src TB --- 2006-01-30 11:29:10 - building world (CFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2006-01-30 11:29:10 - cd /src TB --- 2006-01-30 11:29:10 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything TB --- 2006-01-30 12:17:39 - generating LINT kernel config TB --- 2006-01-30 12:17:39 - cd /src/sys/sparc64/conf TB --- 2006-01-30 12:17:39 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT TB --- 2006-01-30 12:17:39 - building LINT kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2006-01-30 12:17:39 - cd /src TB --- 2006-01-30 12:17:39 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Mon Jan 30 12:17:39 UTC 2006 >>> stage 1: configuring the kernel >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies >>> stage 3.2: building everything [...] ===> isp (all) cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp.c cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c: In function `isp_target_notify': @/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1272: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_ctio': --param large-function-growth limit reached /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:163: warning: called from here @/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1203: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_atio2e': --param large-function-growth limit reached /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:168: warning: called from here *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/sys/modules/isp. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2006-01-30 12:27:47 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2006-01-30 12:27:47 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2006-01-30 12:27:47 - tinderbox aborted TB --- 0.88 user 3.85 system 4147.00 real From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 31 14:29:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA9A16A420; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:29:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46E343D49; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:29:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2.sentex.ca [199.212.134.9]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0VETDoZ015900; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:29:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0VETDUP056429; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:29:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 9F6927302F; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:29:13 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20060131142913.9F6927302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:29:13 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on clamscanner2 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 205.211.164.50 Cc: Subject: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:29:15 -0000 TB --- 2006-01-31 13:20:02 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2006-01-31 13:20:02 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-01-31 13:20:02 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2006-01-31 13:20:27 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2006-01-31 13:20:27 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_6/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-01-31 13:20:27 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_6 src TB --- 2006-01-31 13:30:33 - building world (CFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2006-01-31 13:30:33 - cd /src TB --- 2006-01-31 13:30:33 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything TB --- 2006-01-31 14:18:55 - generating LINT kernel config TB --- 2006-01-31 14:18:55 - cd /src/sys/sparc64/conf TB --- 2006-01-31 14:18:55 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT TB --- 2006-01-31 14:18:55 - building LINT kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2006-01-31 14:18:55 - cd /src TB --- 2006-01-31 14:18:55 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Tue Jan 31 14:18:55 UTC 2006 >>> stage 1: configuring the kernel >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies >>> stage 3.2: building everything [...] ===> isp (all) cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp.c cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c: In function `isp_target_notify': @/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1272: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_ctio': --param large-function-growth limit reached /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:163: warning: called from here @/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1203: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_atio2e': --param large-function-growth limit reached /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:168: warning: called from here *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/sys/modules/isp. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2006-01-31 14:29:13 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2006-01-31 14:29:13 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2006-01-31 14:29:13 - tinderbox aborted TB --- 0.85 user 3.91 system 4151.05 real From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 1 16:53:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F0716A422; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:53:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA6043D6D; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:53:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2.sentex.ca [199.212.134.9]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k11GrQ8Q031329; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:53:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k11GrQFT078996; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:53:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 6E44E7302F; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:53:26 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:53:26 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on clamscanner4 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 205.211.164.50 Cc: Subject: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:53:35 -0000 TB --- 2006-02-01 15:43:51 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2006-02-01 15:43:51 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-02-01 15:43:51 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2006-02-01 15:44:16 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2006-02-01 15:44:16 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_6/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-02-01 15:44:16 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_6 src TB --- 2006-02-01 15:54:31 - building world (CFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2006-02-01 15:54:31 - cd /src TB --- 2006-02-01 15:54:31 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - generating LINT kernel config TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - cd /src/sys/sparc64/conf TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - building LINT kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - cd /src TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Wed Feb 1 16:42:46 UTC 2006 >>> stage 1: configuring the kernel >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies >>> stage 3.2: building everything [...] ===> isp (all) cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp.c cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c: In function `isp_target_notify': @/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1272: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_ctio': --param large-function-growth limit reached /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:163: warning: called from here @/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1203: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_atio2e': --param large-function-growth limit reached /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:168: warning: called from here *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/sys/modules/isp. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2006-02-01 16:53:26 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2006-02-01 16:53:26 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2006-02-01 16:53:26 - tinderbox aborted TB --- 0.81 user 3.84 system 4174.68 real From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 1 17:05:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6540616A420; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:05:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from smtp-3.dlr.de (smtp-3.dlr.de [195.37.61.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A84043D4C; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:05:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from beagle.kn.op.dlr.de ([129.247.173.6]) by smtp-3.dlr.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:05:29 +0100 Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:05:27 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt X-X-Sender: brandt_h@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de To: src-committers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Message-ID: <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Feb 2006 17:05:29.0957 (UTC) FILETIME=[B46DD950:01C62751] Cc: stable@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Harti Brandt List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:05:33 -0000 This is failing since January 26. Shouldn't RELENG_6 build, especially while we're preparing a release? harti On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:43:51 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:43:51 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:43:51 - cleaning the object tree FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:44:16 - checking out the source tree FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:44:16 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_6/sparc64/sparc64 FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:44:16 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_6 src FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:54:31 - building world (CFLAGS=-O -pipe) FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:54:31 - cd /src FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:54:31 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld FT>>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree FT>>>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims FT>>>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools FT>>>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree FT>>>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree FT>>>> stage 2.3: build tools FT>>>> stage 3: cross tools FT>>>> stage 4.1: building includes FT>>>> stage 4.2: building libraries FT>>>> stage 4.3: make dependencies FT>>>> stage 4.4: building everything FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - generating LINT kernel config FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - cd /src/sys/sparc64/conf FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - building LINT kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe) FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - cd /src FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT FT>>>> Kernel build for LINT started on Wed Feb 1 16:42:46 UTC 2006 FT>>>> stage 1: configuring the kernel FT>>>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree FT>>>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree FT>>>> stage 2.3: build tools FT>>>> stage 3.1: making dependencies FT>>>> stage 3.2: building everything FT>[...] FT>===> isp (all) FT>cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp.c FT>cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c FT>/src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c: In function `isp_target_notify': FT>@/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1272: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_ctio': --param large-function-growth limit reached FT>/src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:163: warning: called from here FT>@/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1203: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_atio2e': --param large-function-growth limit reached FT>/src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:168: warning: called from here FT>*** Error code 1 FT> FT>Stop in /src/sys/modules/isp. FT>*** Error code 1 FT> FT>Stop in /src/sys/modules. FT>*** Error code 1 FT> FT>Stop in /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT. FT>*** Error code 1 FT> FT>Stop in /src. FT>*** Error code 1 FT> FT>Stop in /src. FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:53:26 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:53:26 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:53:26 - tinderbox aborted FT>TB --- 0.81 user 3.84 system 4174.68 real FT> FT>_______________________________________________ FT>freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list FT>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 FT>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" FT> FT> FT> From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 1 17:47:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AA516A420; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:47:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C5943D46; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:47:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k11Hkxv3034032; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 10:47:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:47:08 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051230 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harti Brandt References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> In-Reply-To: <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:47:03 -0000 I've been trying to reproduce this on my local hardware, but I can't trigger it. Scott Harti Brandt wrote: > This is failing since January 26. Shouldn't RELENG_6 build, especially > while we're preparing a release? > > harti > > On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:43:51 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:43:51 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:43:51 - cleaning the object tree > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:44:16 - checking out the source tree > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:44:16 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_6/sparc64/sparc64 > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:44:16 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_6 src > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:54:31 - building world (CFLAGS=-O -pipe) > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:54:31 - cd /src > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 15:54:31 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld > FT>>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree > FT>>>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims > FT>>>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools > FT>>>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree > FT>>>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree > FT>>>> stage 2.3: build tools > FT>>>> stage 3: cross tools > FT>>>> stage 4.1: building includes > FT>>>> stage 4.2: building libraries > FT>>>> stage 4.3: make dependencies > FT>>>> stage 4.4: building everything > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - generating LINT kernel config > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - cd /src/sys/sparc64/conf > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - building LINT kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe) > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - cd /src > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:42:46 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT > FT>>>> Kernel build for LINT started on Wed Feb 1 16:42:46 UTC 2006 > FT>>>> stage 1: configuring the kernel > FT>>>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree > FT>>>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree > FT>>>> stage 2.3: build tools > FT>>>> stage 3.1: making dependencies > FT>>>> stage 3.2: building everything > FT>[...] > FT>===> isp (all) > FT>cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp.c > FT>cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c > FT>/src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c: In function `isp_target_notify': > FT>@/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1272: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_ctio': --param large-function-growth limit reached > FT>/src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:163: warning: called from here > FT>@/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1203: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_atio2e': --param large-function-growth limit reached > FT>/src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:168: warning: called from here > FT>*** Error code 1 > FT> > FT>Stop in /src/sys/modules/isp. > FT>*** Error code 1 > FT> > FT>Stop in /src/sys/modules. > FT>*** Error code 1 > FT> > FT>Stop in /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT. > FT>*** Error code 1 > FT> > FT>Stop in /src. > FT>*** Error code 1 > FT> > FT>Stop in /src. > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:53:26 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:53:26 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel > FT>TB --- 2006-02-01 16:53:26 - tinderbox aborted > FT>TB --- 0.81 user 3.84 system 4174.68 real > FT> > FT>_______________________________________________ > FT>freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > FT>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > FT>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > FT> > FT> > FT> From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 2 07:48:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBB316A420; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:48:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6F043D48; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:48:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58D520AE; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:48:47 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -3.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5536020AC; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:48:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 413D733C22; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:48:47 +0100 (CET) To: Scott Long References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:48:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> (Scott Long's message of "Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:47:08 -0700") Message-ID: <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Harti Brandt , sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 07:48:53 -0000 Scott Long writes: > I've been trying to reproduce this on my local hardware, but I can't > trigger it. The ISP driver abuses the inline keyword. As I told mjacob earlier, the extensive inlining not only breaks the build, but probably hurts performance as well. (what gcc is complaining about, specifically, is that expanding calls to inlined functions causes isp_target_notify() to grow by more than 100%) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 2 08:32:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7324416A422; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:32:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1155A43D46; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:32:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k128Wpah083573; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:32:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k128WmOD083570; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:32:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:32:48 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob X-X-Sender: mjacob@ns1.feral.com To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> Message-ID: <20060202002644.M82118@ns1.feral.com> References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-604823647-1138869168=:82118" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Harti Brandt , sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthew Jacob List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:32:57 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-604823647-1138869168=:82118 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Hmm- I doesn't recall "name not mentioned" telling me about this earlier- perhaps he can dig up the mail as I haven't had any mail from him directly in years that I recall. Is the tinderbox still failing? I haven't seen that mail- maybe I'm not on the list it's being sent to? There are two complaints by the sparc64 complier- now that somebody (Marius) gave me useful information I will address it when I have a spare moment tomorrow. Insofar as inlining is concern- possibly so, but it demonstrably causes no compiler complaints in about 50 other contexts. My main concern at the moment is to make sure that the tinderbox failures are addressed and to pretty much ignore anything else from "name not mentioned". On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Scott Long writes: >> I've been trying to reproduce this on my local hardware, but I can't >> trigger it. > > The ISP driver abuses the inline keyword. As I told mjacob earlier, > the extensive inlining not only breaks the build, but probably hurts > performance as well. > > (what gcc is complaining about, specifically, is that expanding calls > to inlined functions causes isp_target_notify() to grow by more than > 100%) > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no > > --0-604823647-1138869168=:82118-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 2 08:37:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D11516A420; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:37:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from smtp-3.dlr.de (smtp-3.dlr.de [195.37.61.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDA843D4C; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:37:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from beagle.kn.op.dlr.de ([129.247.173.6]) by smtp-3.dlr.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:37:08 +0100 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:37:07 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt X-X-Sender: brandt_h@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de To: Matthew Jacob In-Reply-To: <20060202002644.M82118@ns1.feral.com> Message-ID: <20060202093623.H56261@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060202002644.M82118@ns1.feral.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2006 08:37:08.0806 (UTC) FILETIME=[DABD4E60:01C627D3] Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Harti Brandt List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:37:11 -0000 On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Matthew Jacob wrote: MJ>Is the tinderbox still failing? I haven't seen that mail- maybe I'm not on MJ>the list it's being sent to? You may look into either stable@ or spar64@ harti From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 2 08:39:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAC516A420; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:39:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09E243DB8; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:39:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k128dF43083634; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:39:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k128dFG6083631; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:39:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:39:15 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob X-X-Sender: mjacob@ns1.feral.com To: Harti Brandt In-Reply-To: <20060202093623.H56261@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Message-ID: <20060202003821.K82118@ns1.feral.com> References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060202002644.M82118@ns1.feral.com> <20060202093623.H56261@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Matthew Jacob , sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthew Jacob List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:39:43 -0000 > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > MJ>Is the tinderbox still failing? I haven't seen that mail- maybe I'm not on > MJ>the list it's being sent to? > > You may look into either stable@ or spar64@ Ah. I'm subscribed to neither. Okay- thanks for the headsup that it's still broken. I have a slow 420R making its way thru an updated LINT tree right now. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 2 18:45:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D4B16A420; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:45:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCC843D46; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:45:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2c.sentex.ca [64.7.153.30]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k12IjmlE090015; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:45:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k12IjmOl075593; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:45:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id E7CDB7302F; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:45:47 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20060202184547.E7CDB7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:45:47 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on clamscanner4 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: Subject: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:45:50 -0000 TB --- 2006-02-02 17:36:08 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2006-02-02 17:36:08 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-02-02 17:36:08 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2006-02-02 17:36:33 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2006-02-02 17:36:33 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_6/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-02-02 17:36:33 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_6 src TB --- 2006-02-02 17:46:58 - building world (CFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2006-02-02 17:46:58 - cd /src TB --- 2006-02-02 17:46:58 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything TB --- 2006-02-02 18:35:23 - generating LINT kernel config TB --- 2006-02-02 18:35:23 - cd /src/sys/sparc64/conf TB --- 2006-02-02 18:35:23 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT TB --- 2006-02-02 18:35:23 - building LINT kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2006-02-02 18:35:23 - cd /src TB --- 2006-02-02 18:35:23 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Thu Feb 2 18:35:24 UTC 2006 >>> stage 1: configuring the kernel >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies >>> stage 3.2: building everything [...] ===> isp (all) cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp.c cc -O -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=15000 -fno-common -I/obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT -mcmodel=medlow -msoft-float -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c: In function `isp_target_notify': @/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1272: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_ctio': --param large-function-growth limit reached /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:163: warning: called from here @/dev/isp/isp_inline.h:1203: warning: inlining failed in call to 'isp_get_atio2e': --param large-function-growth limit reached /src/sys/modules/isp/../../dev/isp/isp_target.c:168: warning: called from here *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/sys/modules/isp. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /obj/sparc64/src/sys/LINT. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2006-02-02 18:45:47 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2006-02-02 18:45:47 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2006-02-02 18:45:47 - tinderbox aborted TB --- 0.88 user 3.80 system 4178.86 real From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 08:09:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158CA16A420; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 08:09:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from smtp-3.dlr.de (smtp-3.dlr.de [195.37.61.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB8443D5F; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 08:09:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from beagle.kn.op.dlr.de ([129.247.173.6]) by smtp-3.dlr.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:09:38 +0100 Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:09:43 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt X-X-Sender: brandt_h@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= In-Reply-To: <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> Message-ID: <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2006 08:09:38.0160 (UTC) FILETIME=[2D4A7700:01C62899] Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Harti Brandt List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:09:45 -0000 On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: DS>Scott Long writes: DS>> I've been trying to reproduce this on my local hardware, but I can't DS>> trigger it. DS> DS>The ISP driver abuses the inline keyword. As I told mjacob earlier, DS>the extensive inlining not only breaks the build, but probably hurts DS>performance as well. DS> DS>(what gcc is complaining about, specifically, is that expanding calls DS>to inlined functions causes isp_target_notify() to grow by more than DS>100%) The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII CPUs, 512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something about the crosscompiler that is different? harti From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 09:22:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D9916A420; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:22:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C74143D46; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:22:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B9D20AF; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -3.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9854020A8; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 899E333C24; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100 (CET) To: Harti Brandt References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> (Harti Brandt's message of "Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:09:43 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:22:34 -0000 Harti Brandt writes: > The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII CPUs,= =20 > 512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something about the= =20 > crosscompiler that is different? Different CFLAGS perhaps? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 09:27:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDD716A420; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:27:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from smtp-3.dlr.de (smtp-3.dlr.de [195.37.61.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44BC343D45; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:27:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from beagle.kn.op.dlr.de ([129.247.173.6]) by smtp-3.dlr.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:27:28 +0100 Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:27:32 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt X-X-Sender: brandt_h@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= In-Reply-To: <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no> Message-ID: <20060203102603.C59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2006 09:27:28.0828 (UTC) FILETIME=[0D39D7C0:01C628A4] Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Harti Brandt List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:27:31 -0000 On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: DS>Harti Brandt writes: DS>> The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII CPUs, DS>> 512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something about the DS>> crosscompiler that is different? DS> DS>Different CFLAGS perhaps? I have everything out-of-the-box - no special CFLAGS. harti From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 10:14:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB42816A420; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:14:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D82B43D49; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:14:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736CA20AA; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:14:28 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -3.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EDF20A8; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:14:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8904033C22; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:14:27 +0100 (CET) To: Harti Brandt References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203102603.C59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:14:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060203102603.C59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> (Harti Brandt's message of "Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:27:32 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <8664nwrbp8.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:14:34 -0000 Harti Brandt writes: > I have everything out-of-the-box - no special CFLAGS. The tinderbox uses -O2. It is possible that -O2 causes gcc to generate code which is slightly larger (but also slightly faster) in some cases. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 10:27:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9CF16A422; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:27:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB77B43D48; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:27:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2CB1A3C1D; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 02:27:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2F47514A1; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 05:26:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 05:26:59 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20060203102659.GA66445@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203102603.C59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <8664nwrbp8.fsf@xps.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8664nwrbp8.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:27:01 -0000 --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 11:14:27AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Harti Brandt writes: > > I have everything out-of-the-box - no special CFLAGS. >=20 > The tinderbox uses -O2. It is possible that -O2 causes gcc to > generate code which is slightly larger (but also slightly faster) in > some cases. COPTFLAGS=3D-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs. Kris --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD4y/zWry0BWjoQKURAoIIAJ9qHtqStKkPZEQP9XZuSd6V2l6LZwCg3AcV fIQr/UVwhmkv51e+yxWAXeU= =dpdR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 10:53:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C669816A420; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:53:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E6343D69; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:53:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F71420A8; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:53:39 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -3.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5B220A3; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:53:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7880D33C22; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:53:38 +0100 (CET) To: Kris Kennaway References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203102603.C59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <8664nwrbp8.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203102659.GA66445@xor.obsecurity.org> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:53:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060203102659.GA66445@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Fri, 3 Feb 2006 05:26:59 -0500") Message-ID: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:53:51 -0000 Kris Kennaway writes: > COPTFLAGS=3D-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs. Hmm, yes, apparently it only uses -O2 on HEAD. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 12:09:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6226816A420; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:09:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79AD43D46; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:09:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/ZEIST.DE) with ESMTP id k13C968W043483; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:09:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id k13C91gR043482; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:09:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:09:01 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Harti Brandt Message-ID: <20060203130901.A42788@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>; from hartmut.brandt@dlr.de on Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 09:09:43AM +0100 X-AntiVirus-modified: yes X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.2-1; AVE: 6.33.0.31; VDF: 6.33.0.195; host: newtrinity.zeist.de) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:09:10 -0000 On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 09:09:43AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > DS>Scott Long writes: > DS>> I've been trying to reproduce this on my local hardware, but I can't > DS>> trigger it. > DS> > DS>The ISP driver abuses the inline keyword. As I told mjacob earlier, > DS>the extensive inlining not only breaks the build, but probably hurts > DS>performance as well. > DS> > DS>(what gcc is complaining about, specifically, is that expanding calls > DS>to inlined functions causes isp_target_notify() to grow by more than > DS>100%) > > The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII CPUs, > 512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something about the > crosscompiler that is different? > GCC apparently does different intermediate optimizations when built as a cross compiler than the native one; in the past we've e.g. seen a GCC bug in the machine code generation that was only triggered when GCC was built as cross compiler and fed with differently optimized intermediate code due to that. Interestingly the resulting object files generated by the cross compiler and the native one for the source file where this triggered where the same once the bug in the machine code generation was fixed. Marius -- This mail was scanned by AntiVir Milter. This product is licensed for non-commercial use. See www.antivir.de for details. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 12:38:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6047A16A420 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:38:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steven@plehier.net) Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be (adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C7B43D75 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steven@plehier.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id ECEA73875A for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:36:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dD5E06433.access.telenet.be [213.224.100.51]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id C862D386DC for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:36:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43E34E78.2050400@plehier.net> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:37:12 +0100 From: Steven Plehier User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: T1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:38:03 -0000 Hi All, Is there any plan to make FreeBSD work on the new T1 Processor? Cheers, S From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 16:58:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1462416A420; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:58:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from speedfactory.net (mail6.speedfactory.net [66.23.216.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5961743D48; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:58:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (unverified [66.23.211.162]) by speedfactory.net (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 7654102 for multiple; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:59:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k13GwMSr011040; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:58:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:49:57 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <43E34E78.2050400@plehier.net> In-Reply-To: <43E34E78.2050400@plehier.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602031049.59701.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1274/Fri Feb 3 09:43:35 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=1653887525 Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: T1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:58:27 -0000 On Friday 03 February 2006 07:37, Steven Plehier wrote: > Hi All, > > Is there any plan to make FreeBSD work on the new T1 Processor? > > Cheers, Tentatively, yes. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 16:58:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1462416A420; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:58:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from speedfactory.net (mail6.speedfactory.net [66.23.216.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5961743D48; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:58:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (unverified [66.23.211.162]) by speedfactory.net (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 7654102 for multiple; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:59:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k13GwMSr011040; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:58:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:49:57 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <43E34E78.2050400@plehier.net> In-Reply-To: <43E34E78.2050400@plehier.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602031049.59701.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1274/Fri Feb 3 09:43:35 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=1653887525 Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: T1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:58:27 -0000 On Friday 03 February 2006 07:37, Steven Plehier wrote: > Hi All, > > Is there any plan to make FreeBSD work on the new T1 Processor? > > Cheers, Tentatively, yes. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 17:54:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4FB16A420; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:54:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CCD43D45; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:54:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k13Hp6Zi097097; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:51:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:51:06 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20060203.105106.41729362.imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:51:10 -0700 (MST) Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 17:54:09 -0000 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100 > Harti Brandt writes: > > The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII= CPUs, = > > 512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something abou= t the = > > crosscompiler that is different? > = > Different CFLAGS perhaps? These different CFLAGS have been a source of unending problems. I've broken the tinderbox build a couple of times when my LINT build worked w/o hassle. And I got grumped at it, even though I did everything right. Maybe we can build the interbox with a set of standard, well known flags? Warner From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 17:54:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FEE16A423 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:54:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531B443D53 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:54:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k13Hr5Lp097108; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:53:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:53:05 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <8664nwrbp8.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203102659.GA66445@xor.obsecurity.org> <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:53:06 -0700 (MST) Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, stable@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 17:54:16 -0000 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:53:38 +0100 > Kris Kennaway writes: > > COPTFLAGS=3D-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs. > = > Hmm, yes, apparently it only uses -O2 on HEAD. Can we not have special flags for tinderbox builds? It make pre-commit testing a big pita. How about just -O on both head and in RELENG_6? The kernel make files have special magic to disable the parts of -O2 that are known to be bad because tinderbox uses -O2, despite efforts in the past to stop the practice. Warner From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 17:58:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B6A16A420 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:58:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paolo.veronelli@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B219543D45 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:58:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paolo.veronelli@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j3so58099ugf for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:58:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SX1cQQp8UB2NG3hoDMuf5GFDo+/R0Qrd5ALDvCdZGqW3a5naiA1JYFEjrcAeRNG/fa+KrQh7cXJCQw3gmBcG+8eh3l+d2PNm59YgeiuTWflB12poD8eAnl92BGSSjF5NF2bkU0pG1ALFAI9VXr8ZaeGbVFZ6y3cWHWVdvGULu2U= Received: by 10.66.221.11 with SMTP id t11mr1073201ugg; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?151.82.1.79? ( [151.82.1.79]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id y1sm2301643uge.2006.02.03.08.57.06; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:57:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43E398A5.7010809@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:53:41 +0100 From: Paolino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050420 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: usb card for ultra 5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 17:58:19 -0000 Reading the hardware notes I can't guess which card I should buy. I need it for usb disk storage.Is the list under umct module the right one? Is it partial ? I was looking at sitecom cards on e-bay. http://cgi.ebay.com/USB-2-0-PCI-card-4-port-Brand-New-10-yr-warrantee_W0QQitemZ6844055318QQcategoryZ90718QQssPageNameZWD1VQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem is one of the possible cards mentioned under Sitecom usb-232 ? The 232 is confusing me. Thanks a lot for your job. Paolino From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 18:12:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546C116A420 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:12:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92EC43D4C for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:12:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so676609wra for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:12:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=KFJ3wxounEwl0DSUXaNnxz283KUvvgPifKk5PsYSgUaqc77yfwvC2DnqDCBBDbNtd2R8ER9dBf9/vQgBEsvGKu1DWyLlJlh/8r0ylsKj4j7eLXJjGfaSL33w64U3N+tsY/ikyYJK3LcWtCwUzaTUYaJRdqWaQMGjdaKZhoWJp6s= Received: by 10.54.145.13 with SMTP id s13mr2800995wrd; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:12:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.92.8 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:12:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:12:28 -0800 From: Kip Macy To: Steven Plehier In-Reply-To: <43E34E78.2050400@plehier.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <43E34E78.2050400@plehier.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: T1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kmacy@fsmware.com List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:12:30 -0000 Yes. Work will be started once Sun has opened the virtual device models. -Kip On 2/3/06, Steven Plehier wrote: > > Hi All, > > Is there any plan to make FreeBSD work on the new T1 Processor? > > Cheers, > > S > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 18:43:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9421C16A420; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:43:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@pooker.samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1255543D49; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:43:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@pooker.samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k13IYSlk052448; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:34:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@pooker.samsco.org) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:34:28 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long To: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <20060203.105106.41729362.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: <20060203113210.G10747@pooker.samsco.org> References: <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105106.41729362.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-554998001-1138991668=:10747" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: stable@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:43:31 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-554998001-1138991668=:10747 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Warner Losh wrote: > From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) > Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100 > >> Harti Brandt writes: >>> The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII CPU= s, >>> 512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something about th= e >>> crosscompiler that is different? >> >> Different CFLAGS perhaps? > > These different CFLAGS have been a source of unending problems. I've > broken the tinderbox build a couple of times when my LINT build worked > w/o hassle. And I got grumped at it, even though I did everything > right. Maybe we can build the interbox with a set of standard, well > known flags? > > Warner > In this particular case, the problem only shows up when the module builds= =20 as part of the buildkernel target. It does not show up when the code is=20 built into thekernel nor when built as a standalone module. I think that= =20 this inconsistency is actually more problematic. Scott --0-554998001-1138991668=:10747-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 19:47:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF8A16A420 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:47:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rshakin@unixfreak.org) Received: from mail5.dslextreme.com (mail5.dslextreme.com [66.51.199.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AA4E43D45 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:47:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rshakin@unixfreak.org) Received: (qmail 19426 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2006 19:46:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.146]) (rshakin@69.181.39.133) by mail5.dslextreme.com with SMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:46:00 -0800 Message-ID: <43E3B35B.90409@unixfreak.org> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:47:39 -0800 From: Roman Shakin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: some questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:47:22 -0000 Hey guys, I just got a hold of a sun ultra 5 and was wondering what problems to expect, when running and installing freebsd 6.0 on it. And also where can i get more information on this topic. I already know that some ports wont compile. So how can i go about getting everything to work properly just like on i386 ? Thanx --Roman From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 19:56:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E9216A422 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:56:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D4E43D5D for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:56:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 26875 invoked by uid 510); 3 Feb 2006 19:57:57 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88/1261. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.207505 secs); 03 Feb 2006 19:57:57 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.207505 secs Process 26868) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 3 Feb 2006 19:57:56 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: Roman Shakin In-Reply-To: <43E3B35B.90409@unixfreak.org> References: <43E3B35B.90409@unixfreak.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1138996676.26027.16.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:57:56 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: some questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:56:48 -0000 On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 19:47, Roman Shakin wrote: > Hey guys, I just got a hold of a sun ultra 5 and was wondering what > problems to expect, when running and installing freebsd 6.0 on it. And > also where can i get more information on this topic. I already know that > some ports wont compile. So how can i go about getting everything to > work properly just like on i386 ? Thanx --Roman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Roman, FreeBsd 6.0 works fine on my U10, there is a slight issue with Xwindows and keyboards/mice but a quick look at the mailing list archives will give you the answer. Not had a problem with compiling ports so far, though some are not available for Sparc but alternatives are there. Rob From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 21:59:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EBC16A420 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:59:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from toa@pop.agri.ch) Received: from exsmtp02.agrinet.ch (exsmtp02.agrinet.ch [81.221.252.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E60D43D55 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:59:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from toa@pop.agri.ch) Received: from smtp.messaging.ch ([10.50.252.215]) by exsmtp02.agrinet.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 3 Feb 2006 22:59:05 +0100 Received: from [192.168.225.5] ([80.219.88.141]) by smtp.messaging.ch with id t9za1T00132ylCo0000000 for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 22:59:34 +0100 X-IMP: RBL MAPS_ORDB: 0.00, RBL SPAMCOP: 0.00, RBL SORBS: 0.10, RBL SBL+XBL: 0.00, URL RHS: 0.00, URL SURBL: 0.00 Message-ID: <43E3D228.6060801@pop.agri.ch> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 22:59:04 +0100 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2006 21:59:05.0470 (UTC) FILETIME=[0CEB51E0:01C6290D] Subject: profiling with cc X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:59:08 -0000 Hello, I just wonder what I do wrong. I try to compile a simple hello.c with -pg and I fail with the following: [enterprise:~] andreast% cc hello.c -O2 -pg -fno-show-column -o hello.exe /var/tmp//ccwucjWJ.o(.text+0xc): In function `main': : undefined reference to `_mcount' /usr/lib/libc_p.a(__sparc_utrap_setup.po)(.text+0x8): In function `__sparc_utrap_setup': : undefined reference to `_mcount' /usr/lib/libc_p.a(gmon.po)(.text+0x8): In function `monstartup': : undefined reference to `_mcount' /usr/lib/libc_p.a(gmon.po)(.text+0x1a8): In function `_mcleanup': : undefined reference to `_mcount' /usr/lib/libc_p.a(gmon.po)(.text+0x3e8): In function `moncontrol': : undefined reference to `_mcount' /usr/lib/libc_p.a(gmon.po)(.text+0x468): more undefined references to `_mcount' follow [enterprise:~] andreast% cat hello.c #include int main (void) { printf("hello\n"); return 1; } [enterprise:~] andreast% cc -v Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/sparc64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.4 [FreeBSD] 20050518 The machine I use for is a enterprise 2, [enterprise:~] andreast% uname -ra FreeBSD enterprise.andreas.nets 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Feb 2 07:18:49 CET 2006 andreast@enterprise.andreas.nets:/usr/obj/home/andreast/devel/src/sys/GENERIC sparc64 Is there something known about this? Do I do something wrong when I buildworld? The only known thing to me is the modification of CFLAGS= -O -pipe. Thanks in advance. Andreas From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 23:59:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E5316A420 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 23:59:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET) Received: from sakima.Ivy.NET (sakima.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B054343D45 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 23:59:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET) Received: from castrovalva.Ivy.NET (castrovalva.Ivy.NET [IPv6:2001:4830:2150:c0::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sakima.Ivy.NET (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3372FF65 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:59:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by castrovalva.Ivy.NET (Postfix, from userid 405) id 0B3A812FB03; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:59:35 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org References: <43E3B35B.90409@unixfreak.org> <1138996676.26027.16.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> From: Miles Nordin MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Feb__3_18:59:35_2006-1"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:59:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1138996676.26027.16.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> (Robert Slade's message of "Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:57:56 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: T-gnus/6.17.2 (based on No Gnus v0.2) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (alpha--netbsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Subject: Re: some questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 23:59:40 -0000 --pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Feb__3_18:59:35_2006-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >>>>> "rs" == Robert Slade writes: rs> FreeBsd 6.0 works fine on my U10, except that by ``fine'' you mean Firefox/Mozilla and anything else that makes heavy use of POSIX threads doesn't work. Does gdb work again? gprof? CVSup? Java won't work, of course. --pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Feb__3_18:59:35_2006-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD) iQCVAwUAQ+PuZ4nCBbTaW/4dAQJlTwP/Uhw6dLMKiWuDv6xqs20LlwXOx15JxG6d pr9dIRJhVCB/gGAB23x7cYaKrclul7cju8XXL5ORCsEdkvu8hflhymsi/VHYupmp 5DTwJlcbmvEpyFgQfsXy4dqPaIisnX9tSZcbMMGIubY/Zd5Ruyjt7dR8sJUo7+T7 7M6NFId3JAU= =WfL+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Feb__3_18:59:35_2006-1-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 02:03:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE45616A420 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 02:03:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from smtp3.server.rpi.edu (smtp3.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8131843D45 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 02:03:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp3.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k1423B0M030912; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:03:12 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <43E3B35B.90409@unixfreak.org> <1138996676.26027.16.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:03:10 -0500 To: Miles Nordin , freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) on 128.113.2.3 Cc: Subject: Re: some questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 02:03:17 -0000 At 6:59 PM -0500 2/3/06, Miles Nordin wrote: > >>>>> "rs" == Robert Slade writes: > > rs> FreeBsd 6.0 works fine on my U10, > >except that by ``fine'' you mean Firefox/Mozilla and anything >else that makes heavy use of POSIX threads doesn't work. Does >gdb work again? gprof? CVSup? Java won't work, of course. CVSup works. It doesn't work on PowerPC, but it does on sparc64. And there seems to be a lot of progress on 'csup' lately (that's the rewrite of cvsup in C). Obviously different people will have different packages that they need. For *me* and my needs, the sparc64 port is fine. What isn't fine for me is that I'm running it on a slow ultra-10, but that isn't freebsd's fault! :-) -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 02:16:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1841016A420 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 02:16:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA73C43D49 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 02:16:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920) id 904131A3C23; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:16:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 03:16:50 +0100 From: Maxime Henrion To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20060204021650.GF55746@elvis.mu.org> References: <43E3B35B.90409@unixfreak.org> <1138996676.26027.16.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Miles Nordin , freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: some questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 02:16:51 -0000 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 6:59 PM -0500 2/3/06, Miles Nordin wrote: > > >>>>> "rs" == Robert Slade writes: > > > > rs> FreeBsd 6.0 works fine on my U10, > > > >except that by ``fine'' you mean Firefox/Mozilla and anything > >else that makes heavy use of POSIX threads doesn't work. Does > >gdb work again? gprof? CVSup? Java won't work, of course. > > CVSup works. It doesn't work on PowerPC, but it does on sparc64. > And there seems to be a lot of progress on 'csup' lately (that's > the rewrite of cvsup in C). Yep, and I encourage anybody to give it a try. I'm busy rolling a new snapshot now, with many fixes and stuff. As far as I can tell and from what I've been told by numerous people now, csup works like a charm. It has gained status file support recently so the speed problem is fixed, and changing the zlib compression level even made it slightly faster than CVSup in my (somewhat limited) testing. I'd say that the most annoying problem at the moment is that csup doesn't support fixups. That means that if updating a file failed for some reason (and that could happen with corrupted files when using -s), csup will just stupidly complain about the bad checksum and stop (or actually, hang, but that's unrelated :D). It's not a big deal since in that case you can just re-run csup and it'll checkout the file. Now of course, a few other things are still missing: CVS mode, refuse files, a bunch of minor options and stuff, etc. Maybe I'll have time to tackle those, but that's not sure; the reason I've been working quite a lot on csup these days is because I'm jobless, and that can't last forever, unless people are willing to send me money to finish csup :-). This mail ended up being longer than I expected, but I just thought I'd take advantage of this thread to let people know how far exactly I am with this project now (and to do some advertising :-P). Cheers, Maxime From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 02:41:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6C716A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 02:41:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D622B43D45; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 02:41:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k142eUPc054831; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:40:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:40:42 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051230 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warner Losh References: <8664nwrbp8.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203102659.GA66445@xor.obsecurity.org> <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: stable@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 02:41:52 -0000 Warner Losh wrote: > From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) > Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:53:38 +0100 > > >>Kris Kennaway writes: >> >>>COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs. >> >>Hmm, yes, apparently it only uses -O2 on HEAD. > > > Can we not have special flags for tinderbox builds? It make > pre-commit testing a big pita. How about just -O on both head and in > RELENG_6? The kernel make files have special magic to disable the > parts of -O2 that are known to be bad because tinderbox uses -O2, > despite efforts in the past to stop the practice. > > Warner > > There is value in testing -O2, since enabling that is a good long-term goal. What might be nice is to run tinderboxes with all default compiler settings, and then once or twice a week to a special run that has the more experimental flags. Scott From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 04:57:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC2716A422 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:57:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C302F43D45 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:57:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k144tnjN002812; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:55:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:55:49 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com> To: scottl@samsco.org From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:55:52 -0700 (MST) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 04:57:10 -0000 From: Scott Long Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:40:42 -0700 > Warner Losh wrote: > > From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) > > Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 > > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:53:38 +0100 > > = > > = > >>Kris Kennaway writes: > >> > >>>COPTFLAGS=3D-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs. > >> > >>Hmm, yes, apparently it only uses -O2 on HEAD. > > = > > = > > Can we not have special flags for tinderbox builds? It make > > pre-commit testing a big pita. How about just -O on both head and = in > > RELENG_6? The kernel make files have special magic to disable the > > parts of -O2 that are known to be bad because tinderbox uses -O2, > > despite efforts in the past to stop the practice. > > = > > Warner > > = > > = > = > There is value in testing -O2, since enabling that is a good long-ter= m > goal. What might be nice is to run tinderboxes with all default > compiler settings, and then once or twice a week to a special run tha= t > has the more experimental flags. My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags. Warner From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 09:22:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2560216A422; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 09:22:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5108843D45; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 09:22:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k149MSLj069104; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:22:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k149MSkF046360; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:22:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k149MPA3046359; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: Warner Losh Message-ID: <20060204092225.GB46310@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, harti@FreeBSD.ORG, sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 09:22:41 -0000 On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 09:55:49PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote.. > From: Scott Long > Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:40:42 -0700 > > > Warner Losh wrote: > > > From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) > > > Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 > > > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:53:38 +0100 > > > > > > > > >>Kris Kennaway writes: > > >> > > >>>COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs. > > >> > > >>Hmm, yes, apparently it only uses -O2 on HEAD. > > > > > > > > > Can we not have special flags for tinderbox builds? It make > > > pre-commit testing a big pita. How about just -O on both head and in > > > RELENG_6? The kernel make files have special magic to disable the > > > parts of -O2 that are known to be bad because tinderbox uses -O2, > > > despite efforts in the past to stop the practice. > > > > > > Warner > > > > > > > > > > There is value in testing -O2, since enabling that is a good long-term > > goal. What might be nice is to run tinderboxes with all default > > compiler settings, and then once or twice a week to a special run that > > has the more experimental flags. > > My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox > breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox > person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags. I would think that the tinderboxes should run 100% the same flags as what normal release builds use. Nothing more, nothing less. -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 10:54:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B9B16A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:54:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BFA43D48; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:54:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k14AsElh086415; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:54:14 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:54:14 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Wilko Bulte In-Reply-To: <20060204092225.GB46310@freebie.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <20060204135216.P84050@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060204092225.GB46310@freebie.xs4all.nl> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:54:15 +0300 (MSK) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, Warner Losh Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 10:54:26 -0000 On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote: [snip] WB> > My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox WB> > breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox WB> > person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags. WB> WB> I would think that the tinderboxes should run 100% the same flags as WB> what normal release builds use. Nothing more, nothing less. Well, why not take the portbuild approach then? Build standard tinderboxen with standard source and compile flags set, and *also* experimental sets with experimental flags and possibly experimental source patches... Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 11:13:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F4E16A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:13:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D963443D46; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:13:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k14BDCg2060702; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:13:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k14BDBC0047069; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:13:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k14BDBNm047068; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:13:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:13:11 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: Dmitry Morozovsky Message-ID: <20060204111311.GA47047@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060204092225.GB46310@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060204135216.P84050@woozle.rinet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060204135216.P84050@woozle.rinet.ru> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: stable@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, Warner Losh Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:13:20 -0000 On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 01:54:14PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote.. > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > [snip] > > WB> > My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox > WB> > breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox > WB> > person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags. > WB> > WB> I would think that the tinderboxes should run 100% the same flags as > WB> what normal release builds use. Nothing more, nothing less. > > Well, why not take the portbuild approach then? > > Build standard tinderboxen with standard source and compile flags set, and > *also* experimental sets with experimental flags and possibly experimental > source patches... Probably needs more hardware to keep a reasonable tinderbox frequency. -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 11:19:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FFA16A420 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:19:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bel@orel.ru) Received: from mail.orel.ru (relay.orel.ru [213.59.64.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB2A43D48 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:19:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bel@orel.ru) Received: from [192.168.99.99] (pf1.net.orel.ru [213.59.64.75]) by mail.orel.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k14BJUS9064947; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:19:31 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from bel@orel.ru) Message-ID: <43E48DC2.3050904@orel.ru> Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:19:30 +0300 From: Andrew Belashov Organization: ORIS User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060123) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miles Nordin References: <43E3B35B.90409@unixfreak.org> <1138996676.26027.16.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050503030606050708070305" X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Mail Servers on mail.orel.ru host X-Antivirus-Code: 100000 X-Zombi-Check: on netra2.orel.ru Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: some questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:19:38 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050503030606050708070305 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello! Miles Nordin wrote: >>>>>> "rs" == Robert Slade writes: > > rs> FreeBsd 6.0 works fine on my U10, > > except that by ``fine'' you mean Firefox/Mozilla and anything else > that makes heavy use of POSIX threads doesn't work. Does gdb work > again? gprof? CVSup? Java won't work, of course. FreeBSD 6.0 works fine on my U60 SMP workstation. I use Firefox and Thunderbird without any problem. Also, I use KDE 3.5 and MySQL 4.1. My package list is attached. The library libthr is used globally. GDB and CSVup work perfectly. My system have two hacks, related to following problems: 1. SMP kernel panic: ipi_send: couldn't send ipi (src/sys/sparc64/include/smp.h v1.17 does not resolve problem, I bump IPI_RETRIES to high value). 2. firefox and thunderbird is broken on sparc64 (Borrowed from NetBSD patch eliminates a problem). -- With Best Regards, Andrew Belashov. --------------050503030606050708070305 Content-Type: text/plain; name="pkg_info.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="pkg_info.txt" ORBit2-2.12.4_1 High-performance CORBA ORB with support for the C language OpenEXR-1.2.2_1 A high dynamic-range (HDR) image file format akode-2.0.r1,1 Default KDE audio backend akode-plugins-mpc-2.0.r1,1 Musepack decoder plugin for akode akode-plugins-mpeg-2.0.r1,1 MPEG audio decoder plugin for akode akode-plugins-oss-2.0.r1,1 OSS output plugin for akode akode-plugins-resampler-2.0.r1,1 Resampler plugin for akode akode-plugins-xiph-2.0.r1,1 FLAC/Speex/Vorbis decoder plugin for akode arts-1.5.0,1 Audio system for the KDE integrated X11 desktop artswrapper-1.2.2 Setuid wrapper for arts aspell-0.60.4_1 Spelling checker with better suggestion logic than ispell atk-1.10.3 A GNOME accessibility toolkit (ATK) autoconf-2.13.000227_5 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms base64-1.4 Simple program to convert binary files to base64 bash-2.05b.007_4 The GNU Bourne Again Shell bitstream-vera-1.10_2 Bitstream Vera TrueType font collection cairo-1.0.2_1 Vector graphics library with cross-device output support cdparanoia-3.9.8_8 A CDDA extraction tool (also known as ripper) cdrdao-1.2.1 Record CD-R[W]s in disk-at-once mode cdrtools-2.01_2 CD/CD-R[W] and ISO-9660 image creation and extraction tools cups-base-1.1.23.0_7 The Common UNIX Printing System: headers, libs, & daemons cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2 General network file distribution system optimized for CVS cyrus-sasl-2.1.21_2 RFC 2222 SASL (Simple Authentication and Security Layer) db4-4.0.14_1,1 The Berkeley DB package, revision 4 dbus-0.60 A message bus system for inter-application communication desktop-file-utils-0.10_3 A couple of command line utilities for working with desktop dvd+rw-tools-6.0 DVD burning software expat-1.95.8_3 XML 1.0 parser written in C fam-2.6.9_6 A file alteration monitor fftw3-3.0.1_5 Fast C routines to compute the Discrete Fourier Transform firefox-1.5_5,1 Web browser based on the browser portion of Mozilla flac-1.1.2 Free lossless audio codec fontconfig-2.3.2,1 An XML-based font configuration API for X Windows freeradius-1.0.5 A free RADIUS server implementation freetype2-2.1.10_2 A free and portable TrueType font rendering engine fribidi-0.10.4_1 A Free Implementation of the Unicode Bidirectional Algorith gconf2-2.12.1 A configuration database system for GNOME gdbm-1.8.3_1 The GNU database manager gettext-0.14.5 GNU gettext package ghostscript-gnu-7.07_14 GNU Postscript interpreter gle-3.0.3_1 A GL Tubing and Extrusion Library glib-2.8.5 Some useful routines of C programming (current stable versi gmake-3.80_2 GNU version of 'make' utility gnomehier-2.0_7 A utility port that creates the GNOME directory tree gnupg-1.4.2_1 The GNU Privacy Guard gnutls-1.2.9 GNU Transport Layer Security library gsfonts-8.11_2 Fonts used by GNU Ghostscript (or X) gtar-1.15.1_1 GNU version of the traditional tar archiver gtk-2.8.10 Gimp Toolkit for X11 GUI (current stable version) hicolor-icon-theme-0.5 A high-color icon theme shell from the FreeDesktop project imake-6.8.2 Imake and other utilities from X.Org jasper-1.701.0 An implementation of the codec specified in the JPEG-2000 s jpeg-6b_3 IJG's jpeg compression utilities k3b-0.12.10 A CD/DVD recording GUI for KDE kde-lite-3.5.0_1 The FreeBSD release "meta-port" for (a subset of) KDE kdeaccessibility-3.5.0 Accessibility applications for KDE kdeadmin-3.5.0 KDE applications related to system administration kdeartwork-3.5.0 Additional themes, sounds, wallpapers and window styles for kdeartwork-xscreensaver-kde-3.5.0_1 Support for xscreensaver blankers in KDE kdebase-3.5.0 Basic applications for the KDE system kdebase-kompmgr-3.5.0 Utility needed to enable XComposite support in KDE kdegraphics-3.5.0_1 Graphics utilities for the KDE3 integrated X11 desktop kdehier-1.0_8 Utility port which installs a hierarchy of shared KDE direc kdelibs-3.5.0 Base set of libraries needed by KDE programs kdemultimedia-3.5.0 Multimedia utilities for the KDE integrated X11 desktop kdemultimedia-mpeglib_artsplug-3.5.0 Legacy KDE audio backend kdenetwork-3.5.0 Network-related programs and modules for KDE kdeutils-3.5.0 Utilities for the KDE integrated X11 desktop kkbswitch-1.4.3_2 Keyboard layout switcher and indicator for KDE 3.x lame-3.96.1 ISO code based fast MP3 encoder kit lcms-1.14,1 Light Color Management System -- a color management library ldconfig_compat-1.0_4 Ldconfig compatibility script libIDL-0.8.6_1 A library for creating trees of CORBA Interface Definition libXft-2.1.7 A client-sided font API for X applications libao-0.8.5 Portable audio output library libart_lgpl2-2.3.17 Library for high-performance 2D graphics libaudiofile-0.2.6 A sound library for SGI audio file libdvdcss-1.2.9_1 Portable abstraction library for DVD decryption libgcrypt-1.2.2 "General purpose crypto library based on code used in GnuPG libglade2-2.5.1_3 GNOME glade library libglut-6.4.1 A graphics library similar to SGI's OpenGL libgmp-4.1.4_1 A free library for arbitrary precision arithmetic libgpg-error-1.1 Common error values for all GnuPG components libiconv-1.9.2_1 A character set conversion library libidn-0.6.0 Internationalized Domain Names command line tool libltdl-1.5.22 System independent dlopen wrapper libmad-0.15.1b_1 Libmad library (part of MAD project) libmng-1.0.9 Multiple-image Network Graphics (MNG) reference library libogg-1.1.3,3 Ogg bitstream library libpaper-1.1.14.3 A library providing routines for paper size management libsamplerate-0.1.2 Secret Rabbit Code: a Sample Rate Converter for audio libsndfile-1.0.12 Reading and writing files containing sampled sound (like WA libtheora-1.0.a4 Theora video codec for the Ogg multimedia streaming system libtool-1.3.5_2 Generic shared library support script (1.3) libtool-1.5.22_1 Generic shared library support script (1.5) libusb-0.1.10a_1 Library giving userland programs access to USB devices libvorbis-1.1.2,3 Audio compression codec library libxml2-2.6.23 XML parser library for GNOME libxslt-1.1.15 The XSLT C library for GNOME linc-1.0.3_4 A library for writing networked servers & clients lua-5.0.2_1 Small, compilable scripting language providing easy access m4-1.4.4 GNU m4 mDNSResponder-107.1_2 "Apple's mDNSResponder" mysql-client-4.1.16_1 Multithreaded SQL database (client) mysql-server-4.1.16 Multithreaded SQL database (server) nas-1.7b Network Audio System net-snmp-5.2.2 An extendable SNMP implementation nspr-4.6_2 A platform-neutral API for system level and libc like funct nss-3.10 Libraries to support development of security-enabled applic open-motif-2.2.3_2 Motif X11 Toolkit (industry standard GUI (IEEE 1295)) openldap-client-2.2.30 Open source LDAP client implementation openslp-1.2.1_1 Open-source implementation of the Service Location Protocol pango-1.10.2 An open-source framework for the layout and rendering of i1 pccts-1.33.33 The Purdue Compiler Construction Tool Set pchar-1.5 Sandia Internet path characterization tool pcre-6.4 Perl Compatible Regular Expressions library perl-5.8.7_2 Practical Extraction and Report Language pkgconfig-0.20 A utility to retrieve information about installed libraries png-1.2.8_2 Library for manipulating PNG images popt-1.7 A getopt(3) like library with a number of enhancements, fro portupgrade-20051204 FreeBSD ports/packages administration and management tool s python-2.4.2 An interpreted object-oriented programming language qca-tls-1.0_1 SSL/TLS plugin for Qt qt-3.3.5 Multiplatform C++ application framework recode-3.6_5 Converts files between character sets and usages ru-aspell-0.60.4_1 Aspell with Russian dictionary ru-kde-i18n-3.5.0 Russian messages and documentation for KDE3 ruby-1.8.2_5,1 An object-oriented interpreted scripting language ruby18-bdb4-0.5.7 Ruby interface to Sleepycat's Berkeley DB revision 2 or lat samba-libsmbclient-3.0.21a Shared libs from the samba package shared-mime-info-0.16_2 A MIME type database from the FreeDesktop project speex-1.0.5,1 An open-source patent-free voice codec t1lib-5.1.0,1 A Type 1 Rasterizer Library for UNIX/X11 taglib-1.4_1 Library for manipulating ID3 tags and Ogg comments thunderbird-1.5 Mozilla Thunderbird is standalone mail and news that stands thunderbird-enigmail-0.94.0 A GnuPG extension for the Thunderbird mail client tiff-3.8.0 Tools and library routines for working with TIFF images trans-1.20 Character Encoding Converter Generator Package unrar-3.54,3 Extract, view & test RAR archives unzip-5.52_2 List, test and extract compressed files in a ZIP archive xchat2-2.6.1 An X11 IRC client using the GTK+ 2 toolkit xmlcatmgr-2.2 SGML and XML catalog manager xorg-6.8.2 X.Org distribution metaport xorg-clients-6.8.2_1 X client programs and related files from X.Org xorg-documents-6.8.2 Documentation of X11 protocol and libraries from X.Org xorg-fonts-100dpi-6.8.2 X.Org 100dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-75dpi-6.8.2 X.Org 75dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-cyrillic-6.8.2 X.Org Cyrillic bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-encodings-6.8.2 X.Org font encoding files xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-6.8.2 X.Org miscellaneous bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-truetype-6.8.2 X.Org TrueType fonts xorg-fonts-type1-6.8.2 X.Org Type1 fonts xorg-fontserver-6.8.2 X font server from X.Org xorg-libraries-6.8.2 X11 libraries and headers from X.Org xorg-manpages-6.8.2 X.Org library manual pages xorg-nestserver-6.8.2 Nesting X server from X.Org xorg-printserver-6.8.2_2 X Print server from X.Org xorg-server-6.8.2_7 X.Org X server and related programs xorg-vfbserver-6.8.2 X virtual framebuffer server from X.Org xpdf-3.01_2 Display PDF files, and convert them to other formats xscreensaver-gnome-4.23_1 Save your screen while you entertain your cat (for GNOME us xterm-206_1 Terminal emulator for the X Window System zip-2.31 Create/update ZIP files compatible with pkzip --------------050503030606050708070305-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 12:19:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C00016A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:19:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42F943D45; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:19:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA032081; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:19:38 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,LONGWORDS X-Spam-Learn: no X-Spam-Score: -1.2/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8C52080; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:19:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2298C33C22; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:19:38 +0100 (CET) To: Warner Losh References: <8664nwrbp8.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203102659.GA66445@xor.obsecurity.org> <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:19:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> (Warner Losh's message of "Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:53:05 -0700 (MST)") Message-ID: <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, stable@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:19:48 -0000 Warner Losh writes: > Can we not have special flags for tinderbox builds? It make > pre-commit testing a big pita. How about just -O on both head and > in RELENG_6? As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more bugs because it enables optimizations which require more extensive coverage analysis. > The kernel make files have special magic to disable the parts of -O2 > that are known to be bad because tinderbox uses -O2, despite efforts > in the past to stop the practice. The kernel has special magic to disable strict aliasing checks because certain people regularly commit kernel code which violates C aliasing rules and refuse to fix it. The userland code does not need these hacks because I spent a lot of time and effort fixing aliasing bugs in e.g. libalias. Aliasing violations are not trivial matters; they prevent the compiler from optimizing code which (for instance) accesses structure members through pointers to the structure. There is a lot of this in the kernel. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 15:09:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6118116A420 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:09:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paolo.veronelli@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB9543D4C for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:09:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paolo.veronelli@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k3so207617ugf for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 07:09:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nlCLEMm/mSYtniYqosjg70dE1yqmomGfbI2ZOctgWkhOO/1f+6mFOzWldknQlNiWa35fOBlwAoJeHUZX5grTfTWmk+VuvZJAMhP/wiMj7VjAWAniLTw2QMoFno9ulxgCwawXQK7Cv2cLu6FTOS99kLbAY7XovxS975ye/HCUrno= Received: by 10.66.164.4 with SMTP id m4mr1430747uge; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 07:02:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?151.82.1.22? ( [151.82.1.22]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q40sm2947085ugc.2006.02.04.07.02.24; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 07:02:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43E4CF46.7030402@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:59:02 +0100 From: Paolino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050420 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paolino References: <43E398A5.7010809@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43E398A5.7010809@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb card for ultra 5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:09:15 -0000 Paolino wrote: > Reading the hardware notes I can't guess which card I should buy. > I need it for usb disk storage.Is the list under umct module the right > one? Is it partial ? > I was looking at sitecom cards on e-bay. > http://cgi.ebay.com/USB-2-0-PCI-card-4-port-Brand-New-10-yr-warrantee_W0QQitemZ6844055318QQcategoryZ90718QQssPageNameZWD1VQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem > > is one of the possible cards mentioned under Sitecom usb-232 ? > The 232 is confusing me. > > Thanks a lot for your job. > > Paolino > > Is there anyone using usb cards on this arch, who can write down the model. Thanks Paolino From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 16:12:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3F116A420 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:12:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yashy@mail.yashy.com) Received: from mail.yashy.com (mail.yashy.com [206.248.137.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2A74464A for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:12:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yashy@mail.yashy.com) Received: by mail.yashy.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1F1B562EC; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:14:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.yashy.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EA262EA for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:14:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:14:47 -0500 (EST) From: Yasholomew Yashinski To: sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060204110201.W77754@mail.yashy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: vr(4) issue on Ultra 10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:12:25 -0000 I'm intending to use a U10 as a firewall/gateway, so I'm trying to add one of my spare PCI NICs, to use along with the hme0. Trying dc(4) brought my OS down (writing another email), so I'm trying vr(4) which is flooding dmesg/syslog with errors. vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::250:baff:feb4:4664%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 255.255.255.255 ether 00:50:ba:b3:46:61 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active >From dmesg: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Thu Jan 19 19:07:25 EST 2006 yashy@proksie.yashy.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/COLONEL WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter "tick" frequency 440000000 Hz quality 1000 real memory = 536870912 (512 MB) avail memory = 510935040 (487 MB) cpu0: Sun Microsystems UltraSparc-IIi Processor (440.00 MHz CPU) nexus0: pcib0: on nexus0 pcib0: Sabre, impl 0, version 0, ign 0x7c0, bus A pcib0: [FAST] pcib0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcib0: [FAST] pcib0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcib0 dvma: DVMA map: 0xc0000000 to 0xc3ffffff pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.1 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 ebus0: mem 0xf0000000-0xf0ffffff,0xf1000000-0xf17fffff at device 1.0 on pci1 auxio0: addr 0x1400726000-0x1400726003,0x1400728000-0x1400728003,0x140072a000-0x140072a003,0x 140072c000-0x140072c003,0x140072f000-0x140072f003 on ebus0 ebus0: addr 0x1400724000-0x1400724003 irq 37 (no driver attached) ebus0: addr 0x1400504000-0x1400504002 (no driver attached) puc0: addr 0x1400400000-0x140040007f irq 43 on ebus0 uart0: on puc0 uart0: CTS oflow uart1: on puc0 uart1: CTS oflow uart2: <16550 or compatible> addr 0x14003083f8-0x14003083ff irq 41 on ebus0 uart2: keyboard (1200,n,8,1) kbd0 at sunkbd0 uart3: <16550 or compatible> addr 0x14003062f8-0x14003062ff irq 42 on ebus0 ebus0: addr 0x14003043bc-0x14003043cb,0x140030015c-0x140030015d,0x1400700000-0x140070000f irq 34 (no driver attached) ebus0: addr 0x14003023f0-0x14003023f7,0x1400706000-0x140070600f,0x1400720000-0x1400720003 irq 39 (no driver attached) eeprom0: addr 0x1400000000-0x1400001fff on ebus0 eeprom0: model mk48t59 eeprom0: hostid 80a50f01 ebus0: addr 0x1000000000-0x10000fffff (no driver attached) ebus0: addr 0x1400200000-0x14002000ff,0x1400702000-0x140070200f,0x1400704000-0x140070400f,0x 1400722000-0x1400722003 irq 35,36 (no driver attached) hme0: mem 0xe0000000-0xe0007fff at device 1.1 on pci1 miibus0: on hme0 nsphy0: on miibus0 nsphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto hme0: Ethernet address: 08:00:20:a5:0f:01 hme0: [GIANT-LOCKED] machfb0: mem 0xe1000000-0xe1ffffff,0xe2000000-0xe2000fff at device 2.0 on pci1 machfb0: console machfb0: 16 MB aperture at 0xd5b4a000, 1 KB registers at 0xe17ffc00 machfb0: 4096 KB SGRAM 98.924 MHz, maximum RAMDAC clock 230 MHz, DSP machfb0: resolution 1152x900 at 8 bpp atapci0: port 0xc00000-0xc00007,0xc00008-0xc0000b,0xc00010-0xc00017,0xc00018-0xc0001b,0xc00020 -0xc0002f at device 3.0 on pci1 ata2: on atapci0 ata3: on atapci0 pcib2: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pci2: at device 2.0 (no driver attached) pci2: at device 3.0 (no driver attached) pci2: at device 3.1 (no driver attached) syscons0: on nexus0 syscons0: Unknown <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. ad0: 9541MB at ata2-master WDMA2 acd0: CDRW at ata3-master PIO4 acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x64 ascq=0x00 error=4 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0a WARNING: / was not properly dismounted WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted vr0: port 0x400-0x47f mem 0x2000-0x207f at device 2.0 on pci2 miibus1: on vr0 amphy0: on miibus1 amphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto vr0: Ethernet address: 00:50:ba:b3:46:61 vr0: [GIANT-LOCKED] vr0: link state changed to DOWN vr0: link state changed to UP vr0: watchdog timeout vr0: watchdog timeout vr0: watchdog timeout vr0: watchdog timeout vr0: rx packet lost vr0: rx packet lost vr0: rx packet lost vr0: rx packet lost vr0: rx packet lost Thanks in Advance, -- Yashy From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 16:14:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CC316A420 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:14:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yashy@mail.yashy.com) Received: from mail.yashy.com (mail.yashy.com [206.248.137.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A774464A for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:14:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yashy@mail.yashy.com) Received: by mail.yashy.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 02C4562EC; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:17:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.yashy.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC12F62EA for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:17:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:17:11 -0500 (EST) From: Yasholomew Yashinski To: sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060204111553.O77754@mail.yashy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: dc(4) issue on Ultra10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:14:48 -0000 As soon as I try to bring up my dc0 interface, the kernel cores: #0 doadump () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:233 #1 0x00000000c011ef68 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:399 #2 0x00000000c011f2f4 in panic (fmt=0xc0303880 "trap: %s") at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:555 #3 0x00000000c02c1de4 in trap (tf=0xd1a9b220) at /usr/src/sys/sparc64/sparc64/trap.c:369 #4 0x00000000c0048fc0 in tl1_trap () #5 0x00000000c00ac1f4 in dcphy_status (sc=0xfffff800006f1980) at cpufunc.h:104 #6 0x00000000c00ac178 in dcphy_service (sc=0xc00ac1f8, mii=0x0, cmd=0) at /usr/src/sys/dev/mii/dcphy.c:332 #7 0x00000000c00ac178 in dcphy_service (sc=0xfffff800006f1980, mii=0xfffff80000734200, cmd=1) at /usr/src/sys/dev/mii/dcphy.c:332 #8 0x00000000c00af5c4 in mii_tick (mii=0xfffff80000734200) at /usr/src/sys/dev/mii/mii.c:363 #9 0x00000000c0444ab0 in ?? () Thanks in Advance, -- Yashy From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 16:21:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36DB716A541 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:21:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F175744361 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:54:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k14FpV33012807; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 08:51:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:51:34 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:51:34 -0700 (MST) Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, stable@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:21:56 -0000 In message: <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes: : Warner Losh writes: : > Can we not have special flags for tinderbox builds? It make : > pre-commit testing a big pita. How about just -O on both head and : > in RELENG_6? : = : As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more bugs : because it enables optimizations which require more extensive coverag= e : analysis. Then it should be the default, standard flag. : > The kernel make files have special magic to disable the parts of -O= 2 : > that are known to be bad because tinderbox uses -O2, despite effort= s : > in the past to stop the practice. : = : The kernel has special magic to disable strict aliasing checks becaus= e : certain people regularly commit kernel code which violates C aliasing= : rules and refuse to fix it. The userland code does not need these : hacks because I spent a lot of time and effort fixing aliasing bugs i= n : e.g. libalias. The optimizations are disable because they do not work. It is really that simple. The kernel has lots and lots of these problems, it is true. : Aliasing violations are not trivial matters; they prevent the compile= r : from optimizing code which (for instance) accesses structure members : through pointers to the structure. There is a lot of this in the : kernel. I agree. However, I think it is unreasonable to have one set of defaults, then another set that committers are held to. This leads to lots of problems. My bottom line is that as a committer, you are expected to not break the builds with the default flags. The tinderbox runs at a different level, thereby creating the impression that someone has done something wrong when it happens to blow up, when in fact they have not. If -O2 is so good w/o the -fno-strict-alias, then it should be the default so we catch these bugs. I'm not arguing against -O2 because it isn't useful. I'm arguing because it isn't the default. Warner From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 16:48:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E4116A420 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:48:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6A043D4C for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:48:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so806458wra for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:48:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=rWTRfGBfp+i7VjVlcreeRnEzYt57Sw3igQfql30YrvcAwDvmx6jadU8+8XKhvbxNrV7aTC0e7sPg+/OxeXYrXsa7NPN/wJtGUQmlq1stGCqlAgEk9m7WJzX+RAln5vpp71loagV+ujl78TGWrfEfSB0igokvTdYkBakey+N0pZ0= Received: by 10.54.127.19 with SMTP id z19mr4141369wrc; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:48:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.92.8 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 08:48:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 08:48:28 -0800 From: Kip Macy To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kmacy@fsmware.com List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:48:32 -0000 IIRC, at NetApp -O2 was the default for all builds. I think it is safe to say that the generated code is quite stable. If -O2 allows the compiler to catch errors earlier it should be the default. -Kip On 2/4/06, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> > des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes: > : Warner Losh writes: > : > Can we not have special flags for tinderbox builds? It make > : > pre-commit testing a big pita. How about just -O on both head and > : > in RELENG_6? > : > : As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more bugs > : because it enables optimizations which require more extensive coverage > : analysis. > > Then it should be the default, standard flag. > > : > The kernel make files have special magic to disable the parts of -O2 > : > that are known to be bad because tinderbox uses -O2, despite efforts > : > in the past to stop the practice. > : > : The kernel has special magic to disable strict aliasing checks because > : certain people regularly commit kernel code which violates C aliasing > : rules and refuse to fix it. The userland code does not need these > : hacks because I spent a lot of time and effort fixing aliasing bugs in > : e.g. libalias. > > The optimizations are disable because they do not work. It is really > that simple. The kernel has lots and lots of these problems, it is > true. > > : Aliasing violations are not trivial matters; they prevent the compiler > : from optimizing code which (for instance) accesses structure members > : through pointers to the structure. There is a lot of this in the > : kernel. > > I agree. However, I think it is unreasonable to have one set of > defaults, then another set that committers are held to. This leads to > lots of problems. > > My bottom line is that as a committer, you are expected to not break > the builds with the default flags. The tinderbox runs at a different > level, thereby creating the impression that someone has done something > wrong when it happens to blow up, when in fact they have not. If -O2 > is so good w/o the -fno-strict-alias, then it should be the default so > we catch these bugs. > > I'm not arguing against -O2 because it isn't useful. I'm arguing > because it isn't the default. > > Warner > From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 18:59:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A24C16A420 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 18:59:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5850B43D49 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 18:59:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k14Ix7MF088574; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:59:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k14Ig8Fj088472; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:42:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:42:08 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob X-X-Sender: mjacob@ns1.feral.com To: Wilko Bulte In-Reply-To: <20060204092225.GB46310@freebie.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <20060204103132.D88429@ns1.feral.com> References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060204092225.GB46310@freebie.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, harti@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org, Warner Losh Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthew Jacob List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 18:59:19 -0000 > > I would think that the tinderboxes should run 100% the same flags as > what normal release builds use. Nothing more, nothing less. What I would like to see is a pointer to a procedure and tools to make sure builds aren't broken. I've been refreshing my memory about email going back about 5 years, and at that time there was a lot of wrangle over people not doing adequate checking for at least syntactic correctness for multiple platforms. I certainly have broken a lot more than I would like lately, and part of this (other than being too stupid and hasty) came about because it wasn't actually obvious what would be a good pre-commit compile check for kernels for me to follow. At the very least I've now come up with: compile GENERIC (easy enough to do) compile LINT (this wasn't obvious how to make LINT) compile PAE (for i386 at least) Since the complaint of 5 years ago by many was that they didn't have alphas to compile on is still relatively true (that is, few people have more than one architecture) has been addressed in two ways (tinderbox, and cross-compilers), the issue should be better, but for three things I've observed: a) The tinderbox breakage is being treated as bad as stop ship type of bug rather than being informative as it should be. I feel I got roasted and slammed for what should have been simply a "hey- Matt- come fix this please!". b) It's instantly not obvious to me (being lazy and not having kept all my committer mail in a way I can find) how *I* can do a tinderbox run myself. c) Similarily, I don't know how to build a cross-build environment. I should, and I bet if grovel around a bit I can find out how to do so. The point here is that if well-meaning and moderately intelligent committers miss steps that are important to keeping the quality up, please point them at documentation that gives a reasonably coherent set of steps as to how to correct their errors. I'm sure that most of those who err will spend the extra late night hours to get it right then. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 19:15:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D675A16A42C; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:15:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5870543D46; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:15:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k14JDjCl015092; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:13:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:13:49 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20060204.121349.06228212.imp@bsdimp.com> To: kmacy@fsmware.com, kip.macy@gmail.com From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:13:46 -0700 (MST) Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 19:15:38 -0000 In message: Kip Macy writes: : IIRC, at NetApp -O2 was the default for all builds. I think it is safe to : say that the generated code is quite stable. If -O2 allows the compiler to : catch errors earlier it should be the default. If things have really changed, then we should change the default and remove the kludges. My main objection is the mismatch, not the actual value. Did you remove the kludges in the mk files at netapp to remove the -fno-strict-alias? Warner From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 20:03:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F9616A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:03:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D898543D49; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:03:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55AE2081; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:03:13 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -3.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67F02080; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:03:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 95FAE33C22; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:03:13 +0100 (CET) To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:03:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:51:34 -0700 (MST)") Message-ID: <86irruao3i.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, stable@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:03:22 -0000 "M. Warner Losh" writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav writes: > > As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more > > bugs because it enables optimizations which require more extensive > > coverage analysis. > Then it should be the default, standard flag. I wish. Unfortunately, there is a very vocal minority which systematically opposes this kind of change. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 20:05:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F91216A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:05:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A177943D48; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:05:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9332081; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:05:15 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -3.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7B02080; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:05:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D589733C22; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:05:14 +0100 (CET) To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060204.121349.06228212.imp@bsdimp.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:05:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060204.121349.06228212.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:13:49 -0700 (MST)") Message-ID: <86ek2iao05.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, kmacy@fsmware.com, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:05:20 -0000 "M. Warner Losh" writes: > If things have really changed, then we should change the default and > remove the kludges. My main objection is the mismatch, not the actual > value. Did you remove the kludges in the mk files at netapp to remove > the -fno-strict-alias? Most of the kernel builds fine without -fno-strict-alias. Some parts do not, and the committer responsible for introducing those errors added the kluges you mention to avoid having to fix his code. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 20:11:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB62016A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:11:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EAB43D45; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:11:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52F52081; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:11:10 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -3.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598352080; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:11:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3FFB033C22; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:11:10 +0100 (CET) To: Matthew Jacob References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060204092225.GB46310@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060204103132.D88429@ns1.feral.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:11:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060204103132.D88429@ns1.feral.com> (Matthew Jacob's message of "Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:42:08 -0800 (PST)") Message-ID: <861wyianq9.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, harti@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org, Wilko Bulte , Warner Losh Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:11:17 -0000 Matthew Jacob writes: > a) The tinderbox breakage is being treated as bad as stop ship type of > bug rather than being informative as it should be. I feel I got > roasted and slammed for what should have been simply a "hey- Matt- > come fix this please!". Not really. You were "roasted and slammed" for ignoring repeated tinderbox failures for seven or eight consecutive days. > b) It's instantly not obvious to me (being lazy and not having kept > all my committer mail in a way I can find) how *I* can do a tinderbox > run myself. cd /usr/src/tools/tools/tinderbox make && make install man tbmaster > c) Similarily, I don't know how to build a cross-build environment. I > should, and I bet if grovel around a bit I can find out how to do so. man build DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 20:24:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149CD16A422 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:24:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE7643D7B for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:23:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so826306wra for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:23:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NuvOsCiUIpJYHsLEMlIfGaJHDX+BPGK4KKaFLpPNpcLGtcRk+07cCa+nrbrkVm+gkZlHKXytf/8e2QXeRZRQEp4ewcXj/yFNMmx/o+SjECQwaGqdgl0lFfs25jQbicjvSqvYm0ZS4Opv75R+CqBRXK1A+EIm+0nF4rPG570iYtM= Received: by 10.54.126.12 with SMTP id y12mr4182783wrc; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:23:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.92.8 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:23:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:23:52 -0800 From: Kip Macy In-Reply-To: <861wyianq9.fsf@xps.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060204092225.GB46310@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060204103132.D88429@ns1.feral.com> <861wyianq9.fsf@xps.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, Wilko Bulte , Matthew Jacob , Warner Losh Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kmacy@fsmware.com List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:24:01 -0000 Actually, in my tree, 19 files don't compile. In all of the files I've looked at PCPU_SET is the offender. My guess is that the issue could be fixed by passing the type as an argument. On 2/4/06, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > Matthew Jacob writes: > > a) The tinderbox breakage is being treated as bad as stop ship type of > > bug rather than being informative as it should be. I feel I got > > roasted and slammed for what should have been simply a "hey- Matt- > > come fix this please!". > > Not really. You were "roasted and slammed" for ignoring repeated > tinderbox failures for seven or eight consecutive days. > > > b) It's instantly not obvious to me (being lazy and not having kept > > all my committer mail in a way I can find) how *I* can do a tinderbox > > run myself. > > cd /usr/src/tools/tools/tinderbox > make && make install > man tbmaster > > > c) Similarily, I don't know how to build a cross-build environment. I > > should, and I bet if grovel around a bit I can find out how to do so. > > man build > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no > From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 21:28:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E5116A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:28:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4973743D55; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:28:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k14LSWA7048337; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:28:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 83118-07-3; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:28:09 +0200 (EET) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k14LDwle047349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:13:58 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) id k14LDv06006484; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:13:57 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:13:57 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20060204211357.GD7604@ip.net.ua> References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> <86irruao3i.fsf@xps.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86irruao3i.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, harti@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:28:42 -0000 --FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:03:13PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > "M. Warner Losh" writes: > > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav writes: > > > As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more > > > bugs because it enables optimizations which require more extensive > > > coverage analysis. > > Then it should be the default, standard flag. >=20 > I wish. Unfortunately, there is a very vocal minority which > systematically opposes this kind of change. >=20 What breakage do you mean if tinderboxes are run without it and usually compile successfully? :-) I mean, I don't see a reason not to remove -fno-strict-aliasing =66rom the kernel builds now. Perhaps it's still needed for some platforms that aren't covered by tinderbox, not sure... Can be easily checked with "make universe". Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD5RkVqRfpzJluFF4RAklIAJ0QEzi5JZ0aMyURweB0fqXGYOxlewCfUAbp /mt4rOFebq7i3OSK+OjWhyo= =fTUH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 21:33:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A373516A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:33:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3E943D48; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:33:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k14LUpQR016447; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:30:51 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:30:54 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20060204.143054.47698885.imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <86ek2iao05.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <20060204.121349.06228212.imp@bsdimp.com> <86ek2iao05.fsf@xps.des.no> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:30:52 -0700 (MST) Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, kmacy@fsmware.com, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:33:10 -0000 In message: <86ek2iao05.fsf@xps.des.no> des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes: : "M. Warner Losh" writes: : > If things have really changed, then we should change the default an= d : > remove the kludges. My main objection is the mismatch, not the act= ual : > value. Did you remove the kludges in the mk files at netapp to rem= ove : > the -fno-strict-alias? : = : Most of the kernel builds fine without -fno-strict-alias. Some parts= : do not, and the committer responsible for introducing those errors : added the kluges you mention to avoid having to fix his code. There's many different files in the tree that fail to compile. I find this hard to believe. A quick survey shows breakage in the following areas: firewire, advansys, an, amr, ciss, hifn, isp, mly, pccbb, rue, ubser, ucom, msdosfs, nullfs, portalfs, udf, unionfs, ext2fs, reiserfs, cd9660, init_main, kern_exit, kern_fork, kern_malloc, kern_mtxpool, kern_synch, kern_thread, link_elf, sys_pipe, vfs_mount, bluetooth, gif, ufs, xfs, sbni, i386/machdep, mp_machdep, pmap, sys_machdep, imgact_coff, npx I'm not sure about which committer you are talking about, but I can't imagine that one person is responsible for all of that... Warner From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 21:36:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E8116A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:36:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EFF43D49; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:36:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k14LXoQX016468; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:33:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:33:53 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20060204.143353.109955782.imp@bsdimp.com> To: ru@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20060204211357.GD7604@ip.net.ua> References: <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> <86irruao3i.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204211357.GD7604@ip.net.ua> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:33:50 -0700 (MST) Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, harti@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:36:42 -0000 In message: <20060204211357.GD7604@ip.net.ua> Ruslan Ermilov writes: : On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:03:13PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: : > "M. Warner Losh" writes: : > > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav writes: : > > > As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more : > > > bugs because it enables optimizations which require more extensive : > > > coverage analysis. : > > Then it should be the default, standard flag. : > : > I wish. Unfortunately, there is a very vocal minority which : > systematically opposes this kind of change. : > : What breakage do you mean if tinderboxes are run without it and : usually compile successfully? :-) : : I mean, I don't see a reason not to remove -fno-strict-aliasing : from the kernel builds now. Perhaps it's still needed for some : platforms that aren't covered by tinderbox, not sure... Can be : easily checked with "make universe". There's a dozen or two files that will fail to compile -O2 w/o it spread through the tree. Warner From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 20:28:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2699616A425; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:28:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (ns1.pittgoth.com [216.38.206.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F51643D64; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:28:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (ip68-105-180-11.dc.dc.cox.net [68.105.180.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k14L9PBV086189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:09:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:28:15 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: kmacy@fsmware.com Message-Id: <20060204152815.15ee487a.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:41:21 +0000 Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, harti@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org, imp@bsdimp.com Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:28:36 -0000 On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 08:48:28 -0800 Kip Macy wrote: > IIRC, at NetApp -O2 was the default for all builds. I think it is safe to > say that the generated code is quite stable. If -O2 allows the compiler to > catch errors earlier it should be the default. > I concur. -- Tom Rhodes From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 21:33:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3068516A4AC; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:33:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822DC43D46; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:33:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k14LW1tJ016448; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:32:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:32:05 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20060204.143205.69311250.imp@bsdimp.com> To: kmacy@fsmware.com, kip.macy@gmail.com From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <20060204103132.D88429@ns1.feral.com> <861wyianq9.fsf@xps.des.no> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:32:02 -0700 (MST) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:41:36 +0000 Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, wb@freebie.xs4all.nl, mj@feral.com Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:33:25 -0000 In message: Kip Macy writes: : Actually, in my tree, 19 files don't compile. In all of the files I've : looked at PCPU_SET is the offender. My guess is that the issue could be : fixed by passing the type as an argument. In the drivers there's a lot of other breakage. Warner From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 22:06:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D2316A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:06:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D3C43D48; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:06:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298362081; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:06:11 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -3.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190EC2080; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:06:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F347C33C22; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:06:10 +0100 (CET) To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> <86irruao3i.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204211357.GD7604@ip.net.ua> <20060204.143353.109955782.imp@bsdimp.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 23:06:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060204.143353.109955782.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:33:53 -0700 (MST)") Message-ID: <86fymyn5il.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, harti@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, ru@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 22:06:17 -0000 "M. Warner Losh" writes: > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > I mean, I don't see a reason not to remove -fno-strict-aliasing > > from the kernel builds now. Perhaps it's still needed for some > > platforms that aren't covered by tinderbox, not sure... Can be > > easily checked with "make universe". First of all, the kernel Makefiles contain a hack which force -fno-strict-aliasing whether you want it or not. Second, the kernel will *not* build without -fno-strict-aliasing, partly because of preexisting aliasing violations and partly because of aliasing violations which were introduced after the hack (and could have been avoided if that hack had not been in place). > There's a dozen or two files that will fail to compile -O2 w/o it > spread through the tree. not throughout the tree - only in the kernel. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no