From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 11:08:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDF516A642 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874A743D8F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8PB8XZ5090697 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:33 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8PB8WLu090693 for freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:32 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:32 GMT Message-Id: <200609251108.k8PB8WLu090693@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: linimon set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:48 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o sparc/71729 sparc64 printf in kernel thread causes panic on SPARC o sparc/72962 sparc64 [sysinstall] Sysinstall panics on sparc64 if /dev/cd0 o sparc/80410 sparc64 [netgraph] netgraph is causing crash with mpd on sparc o sparc/80890 sparc64 [panic] kmem_malloc(73728): kmem_map too small running o sparc/91882 sparc64 [mouse] Ultra 10 mouse/keyboard o sparc/92033 sparc64 [dc] dc(4) issues on Ultra10 o sparc/95297 sparc64 vt100 term does not work in install o sparc/95892 sparc64 [hme] MAC address of hme interfaces is ff:ff:ff:ff:ff: o sparc/98269 sparc64 Fresh 6.1 installation fails to boot 9 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o sparc/72998 sparc64 [kernel] [patch] set_mcontext() change syscalls parame s sparc/82681 sparc64 [dc] dc state messages o sparc/90316 sparc64 [kbd] Keyboard "lock" key lights not working properly f sparc/91334 sparc64 FreeBSD 6.0 don't support tftp boot from remot tftp se o sparc/94190 sparc64 hw.physmem tunable does not work on sparc o sparc/94483 sparc64 [ath] ath_hal does not work on 6-release/sparc64 o sparc/97707 sparc64 mkskel.sh has bogus timestamp, causing buildworld on s 7 problems total. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 02:54:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B61616A403; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:54:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C7843D45; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:54:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2c.sentex.ca [64.7.153.30]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8R2rxKw037688; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:53:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8R2rxr4071338; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:53:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 93C617302F; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:53:59 -0400 (EDT) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20060927025359.93C617302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:53:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.3, clamav-milter version 0.88.3 on clamscanner2 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.1, clamav-milter version 0.88.1 on clamscanner4 X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:54:01 -0000 TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:03 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:03 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:03 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:32 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:32 - cd /tinderbox/HEAD/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:32 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2006-09-27 02:30:03 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe) TB --- 2006-09-27 02:30:03 - cd /src TB --- 2006-09-27 02:30:03 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> World build started on Wed Sep 27 02:30:04 UTC 2006 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries [...] ===> lib/libalias (all) ===> lib/libalias/libalias (all) cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias.c cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_db.c cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c: In function `ProxyEncodeIpHeader': /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c:524: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c:529: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/lib/libalias/libalias. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/lib/libalias. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2006-09-27 02:53:59 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2006-09-27 02:53:59 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2006-09-27 02:53:59 - tinderbox aborted TB --- 1.00 user 5.18 system 1856.30 real From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 10:32:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6EF16A416; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CCF43D5D; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:32:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5C95E63; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:32:55 +0400 (MSD) Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72E15E28; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:32:55 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from ru@localhost) by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) id k8RAWvhU006311; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:32:57 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:32:57 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: piso@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20060927103257.GA4598@rambler-co.ru> References: <20060927025359.93C617302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060927025359.93C617302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:32:58 -0000 --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Should be "fixed" now, by adding NO_WERROR=3D back to libalias/Makefile. On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 10:53:59PM -0400, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:03 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sen= tex.ca > TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:03 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/spar= c64 > TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:03 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:32 - checking out the source tree > TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:32 - cd /tinderbox/HEAD/sparc64/sparc64 > TB --- 2006-09-27 02:23:32 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -P= d -A src > TB --- 2006-09-27 02:30:03 - building world (CFLAGS=3D-O2 -pipe) > TB --- 2006-09-27 02:30:03 - cd /src > TB --- 2006-09-27 02:30:03 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld > >>> World build started on Wed Sep 27 02:30:04 UTC 2006 > >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree > >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims > >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools > >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree > >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree > >>> stage 2.3: build tools > >>> stage 3: cross tools > >>> stage 4.1: building includes > >>> stage 4.2: building libraries > [...] > =3D=3D=3D> lib/libalias (all) > =3D=3D=3D> lib/libalias/libalias (all) > cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unus= ed-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wret= urn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunuse= d-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -= c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias.c > cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unus= ed-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wret= urn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunuse= d-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -= c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_db.c > cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unus= ed-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wret= urn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunuse= d-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -= c /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c > /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c: I= n function `ProxyEncodeIpHeader': > /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c:52= 4: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type > /src/lib/libalias/libalias/../../../sys/netinet/libalias/alias_proxy.c:52= 9: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /src/lib/libalias/libalias. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /src/lib/libalias. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /src/lib. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /src. > TB --- 2006-09-27 02:53:59 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1= =20 > TB --- 2006-09-27 02:53:59 - ERROR: failed to build world > TB --- 2006-09-27 02:53:59 - tinderbox aborted > TB --- 1.00 user 5.18 system 1856.30 real --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFGlNZqRfpzJluFF4RAo/KAKCXBEZntHTGxEUxeC3pD+ku/FwTsgCghyyn /W2w97LNRuH8zMO8VglQmX0= =96sl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 19:28:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B5B16A412 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:28:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9D843D58 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:28:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8RJRSMd006168 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:27:29 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:26:10 -0700 Message-Id: <1159385171.850.237.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com Subject: Terrible hme throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:28:24 -0000 I am seeing terrible network throughput on my Ultra 1E+ (a "fast" 1E clone). It uses the hme interface; throughputs using scp on a large file are about 1.3MB/s. Transferring the same file using scp between two different, faster computers gives me a throughput of about 8-9MB/s. This is a 100MB/s network, so that seems OK. ifconfig shows that hme is set properly (as far as I can tell): hme0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=b inet6 fe80::240:dcff:fe3b:21d8%hme0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.0.103 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 ether 00:40:dc:3b:21:d8 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active and the MTUs are the same for all machines (and all are FreeBSD 6.1). Yes, I know that scp has overhead, but I find it hard to believe that the box could not keep up with it (it is a blazing 300MHz, after all), particularly for the throughput reduction I see. Any suggestions on how I can increase the network performance of my 1E+? Frank From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 19:55:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA2816A403 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET) Received: from sakima.Ivy.NET (sakima.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC26A43D4C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:55:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET) Received: from castrovalva.Ivy.NET (castrovalva.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sakima.Ivy.NET (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89532FF62 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:55:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by castrovalva.Ivy.NET (Postfix, from userid 405) id 1E84212FB04; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:55:11 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org References: <1159385171.850.237.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> From: Miles Nordin MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_15:55:01_2006-1"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:55:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1159385171.850.237.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> (Frank Jahnke's message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:26:10 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: T-gnus/6.17.2 (based on No Gnus v0.2) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (alpha--netbsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:55:14 -0000 --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_15:55:01_2006-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >>>>> "fj" == Frank Jahnke writes: fj> using scp on a large file are about 1.3MB/s. try an scp to localhost. 1MB/s is about what I get with 500MHz UltraSPARC IIe. The scp built into Solaris (compiled with Studio or Forte or something I assume) is a little over twice as fast on a 440MHz UltraSPARC IIi. sorry I can't compare exactly the same hardware, but I'm assuming the compiler is probably the difference. --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_15:55:01_2006-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD) iQCVAwUARRrXHonCBbTaW/4dAQJifgQAlSFPkmOzdfUjH6V9QSCP9fGWyN44l9Zm 5N8YwWjiXWtGuykeESjIBeQi667WFrUQYigwd39W5z0IUzjhIJ0Tzpe2qTZgoKyy glHRlEEcPC5rmcFNbb0y9h/SyH/s0QrmMCkFQAFdFl6FYFWI439fR8mDUwB0Ru15 P43CujP5zzk= =8bmF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_15:55:01_2006-1-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 20:45:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB3816A403 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:45:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5627443D53 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:45:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8RKi8W6029082 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:44:09 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:42:50 -0700 Message-Id: <1159389770.850.244.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:45:04 -0000 I forgot to cc: the list, so here it is. On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 16:01 -0400, Lucas Holt wrote: > A few suggestions come to mind. Try another protocol and see what > type of transfer speeds you get. It there one you might suggest? > Test the performance of your hard > drive reads/writes. Its possible the drive controller is not using > udma for example. Some of the sun machines only support wdma which > limits transfers to 16MB/s if it happens to use IDE. Granted, this > doesn't explain the performance entirely but if there are a lot of > interrupts for disk IO, it may slow down your network performance. It is a SCSI drive using 20MB/s transfers at the controller. It has been tested and it works properly (about 15MB/s speeds). Though not fast, that should be plenty for a 100Mb/s network (typo in original post). Frank From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 20:52:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E93616A47E for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:52:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8631443D58 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:52:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8RKpDd8031110; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:51:13 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: Lucas Holt In-Reply-To: <655D1BFE-663E-43FA-823A-580D1C750C1C@foolishgames.com> References: <1159385171.850.237.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> <7C3C28AA-2F03-4767-B480-8E1C499F0F94@foolishgames.com> <1159387883.850.243.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> <655D1BFE-663E-43FA-823A-580D1C750C1C@foolishgames.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:49:54 -0700 Message-Id: <1159390194.850.252.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:52:25 -0000 On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 16:40 -0400, Lucas Holt wrote: > >> A few suggestions come to mind. Try another protocol and see what > >> type of transfer speeds you get. > > > > It there one you might suggest? > > You could always try ftp. In my experience its much faster than sftp > although not secure. Just to test it might be interesting. That would be the usual candidate; I'll have to enable it and then try it. This is all using computers behind a firewall that are inaccessible from the Internet. So security is of no concern for these tests. > > It is a SCSI drive using 20MB/s transfers at the controller. It has > > been tested and it works properly (about 15MB/s speeds). Though not > > fast, that should be plenty for a 100Mb/s network (typo in original > > post). > I'll get my sparc out later and do a little testing. I'd appreciate that. Mine is not a Sun (it was made by Tritec) but any low-end SPARC of the era ought to do. Even if it is an Ultra 5 with the slow IDE controller. I just can't see the controller making the big difference for this application. I would also appreciate it if you would copy the list so we can keep the thread in tact. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 21:24:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7609416A588 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:24:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D59F43DF4 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:21:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8RLKZPk007163; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:20:38 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: carton@Ivy.NET Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:19:16 -0700 Message-Id: <1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com Cc: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:24:57 -0000 fj>> using scp on a large file are about 1.3MB/s. > > try an scp to localhost. > > 1MB/s is about what I get with 500MHz UltraSPARC IIe. The scp built > into Solaris (compiled with Studio or Forte or something I assume) is > a little over twice as fast on a 440MHz UltraSPARC IIi. sorry I can't > compare exactly the same hardware, but I'm assuming the compiler is > probably the difference. Well, I get about 0.9MB/s using scp to copy from the original file to localhost. The overhead on both ends of the transfer undoubtedly explains the (slightly) lower transfer rates. *Sheesh* OTOH, I recall that people are using this level of hardware as routers, and I recall them getting about 30Mb/s (or 4MB/s) through them. Is there really that much overhead with scp? Frank From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 21:32:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1326B16A416 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from noop.in-addr.com (noop.in-addr.com [208.58.23.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFB443DAA for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:32:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from gjp by noop.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1GSh0O-000Mxs-41 for Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:31:48 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:31:48 -0400 From: Gary Palmer To: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060927213148.GB60529@in-addr.com> Mail-Followup-To: Freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org References: <1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:32:41 -0000 On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:19:16PM -0700, Frank Jahnke wrote: > fj>> using scp on a large file are about 1.3MB/s. > > > > try an scp to localhost. > > > > 1MB/s is about what I get with 500MHz UltraSPARC IIe. The scp built > > into Solaris (compiled with Studio or Forte or something I assume) is > > a little over twice as fast on a 440MHz UltraSPARC IIi. sorry I can't > > compare exactly the same hardware, but I'm assuming the compiler is > > probably the difference. > > Well, I get about 0.9MB/s using scp to copy from the original file to > localhost. The overhead on both ends of the transfer undoubtedly explains > the (slightly) lower transfer rates. > > *Sheesh* > > OTOH, I recall that people are using this level of hardware as routers, and > I recall them getting about 30Mb/s (or 4MB/s) through them. Is there really > that much overhead with scp? >From memory, back in the dim and murky past when I was a Solaris admin, I heard co-workers comment that the math involved in SSL/SSH encryption was not particularly nice to SPARC/UltraSPARC CPUs. Or rather, the CPUs were not particularly fast when faced with that math. End result - booming business for SSL offloaders. I've seen an Ultra II push > 20MBit/sec with Firewall 1 loaded doing hme<->hme routing, so I strongly suspect its related to ssh/scp/sftp From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:03:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0366616A40F for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET) Received: from sakima.Ivy.NET (sakima.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210B743D93 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:03:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET) Received: from castrovalva.Ivy.NET (castrovalva.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sakima.Ivy.NET (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0CF2FF62 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:03:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by castrovalva.Ivy.NET (Postfix, from userid 405) id B1BBB12FB04; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:03:24 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org References: <1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> From: Miles Nordin MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:03:24_2006-1"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:03:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> (Frank Jahnke's message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:19:16 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: T-gnus/6.17.2 (based on No Gnus v0.2) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (alpha--netbsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:03:34 -0000 --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:03:24_2006-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >>>>> "fj" == Frank Jahnke writes: fj> Is there really that much overhead with scp? well, like I said, for me 'scp file localhost:file0' is about 2.3x faster on Solaris than FreeBSD. --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:03:24_2006-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD) iQCVAwUARRr1LInCBbTaW/4dAQJ+fAP/VBoi6yoc0bRLyhf4djGitlkAWPRDSNR6 XJXMQxOIJhFj+JnVgVm1hShPhOLmAqGHF8dGSAjFbXGMA6jtRv0DpgLXgVW5zowp SkvNWhbiwavMLUb2aXe6PGGUBK9J2Pw1Z4p4liMOASqNRbLZj5jzr3bdgGOr/Wnf I8T7IoDSPp4= =tA0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:03:24_2006-1-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:29:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C289A16A40F for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:29:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0527743D5E for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:29:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8RMSRVS026720 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:28:27 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: 1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:27:07 -0700 Message-Id: <1159396027.5199.18.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com Subject: Terrible hme throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:29:09 -0000 > well, like I said, for me 'scp file localhost:file0' is about 2.3x > faster on Solaris than FreeBSD. Sure, that's the first factor of two. There's one or two factors of two left to be found. Maybe it is the Sparc disadvantage for these sorts of calculations cited earlier. Must be heavy in integer math... Frank From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:51:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4C516A403 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET) Received: from sakima.Ivy.NET (sakima.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5853643D4C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:51:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET) Received: from castrovalva.Ivy.NET (castrovalva.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sakima.Ivy.NET (Postfix) with ESMTP id B310E2FF62 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:51:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by castrovalva.Ivy.NET (Postfix, from userid 405) id F153412FB04; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:51:55 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org References: <1159396027.5199.18.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> From: Miles Nordin MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:51:55_2006-1"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:51:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1159396027.5199.18.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> (Frank Jahnke's message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:27:07 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: T-gnus/6.17.2 (based on No Gnus v0.2) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (alpha--netbsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:51:59 -0000 --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:51:55_2006-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >>>>> "fj" == Frank Jahnke writes: fj> There's one or two factors of two left to be found. Maybe it fj> is the Sparc disadvantage for these sorts of calculations no, I don't think there are any more factors of two to find. 300MHz Pentium, Linux with gcc: 1.5MByte/s 440MHz UltraSPARC II, Solaris with Sun C compiler: 2.3MByte/s 500MHz UltraSPARC II, FreeBSD with gcc: 1.0MByte/s try a slow PeeCee and see if you get similar results. I think it's about right: divide performance in half as penalty for trying to use gcc on anything but i386. My friend who makes big ftp servers with dm_crypt encrypted disks reports results roughly in the same ballpark: 40MByte/s throughput IDE-RAID<->GigEthernet with encryption, 90MByte/s without, on modern 2 - 3GHz PeeCees. In that case it's just decryption rather than ssh+sshd running on the same CPU, so divide that throughput in half, and you are in the same MB per MHz ballpark as the other results. I think it is probably working properly. --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:51:55_2006-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD) iQCVAwUARRsAi4nCBbTaW/4dAQIyvQP/XnsEDlBoHNuhZxmx+P+W1tRWOfndjNX8 u0a1Qm+3jHmcTkN0ERR7YQG/V88kLtlHdJDB+Lo8njJKf1WXFoSj+Oq9djWY3pRJ HaJQQgeZZtM0przSjbS3owUDXTeiEwOIA5vmue9NxdKPaR6GYZR2HR5wOB2dvz06 x5v/3RbIkh4= =5k2+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Sep_27_18:51:55_2006-1-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 00:43:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B266816A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:43:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8A943D45 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:43:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8S0gBxZ002791 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:42:11 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:40:49 -0700 Message-Id: <1159404049.5199.31.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com Subject: Terrible hme throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:43:40 -0000 > fj> There's one or two factors of two left to be found. Maybe it > fj> is the Sparc disadvantage for these sorts of calculations > > no, I don't think there are any more factors of two to find. > > 300MHz Pentium, Linux with gcc: 1.5MByte/s > 440MHz UltraSPARC II, Solaris with Sun C compiler: 2.3MByte/s > 500MHz UltraSPARC II, FreeBSD with gcc: 1.0MByte/s > > try a slow PeeCee and see if you get similar results. I think it's > about right: divide performance in half as penalty for trying to use > gcc on anything but i386. I had no idea that there was so much overhead with scp. I tried scp to localhost on my main workstation (dual Athlons, 15K SCSIs, FreeBSD) and got about 7MB/s. That is a hit of about a factor of 10 for using scp from the native disk rate. I will indeed try it on a slow PC soon: I am bring up a dual Pentium III server in a week so so. > > My friend who makes big ftp servers with dm_crypt encrypted disks > reports results roughly in the same ballpark: 40MByte/s throughput > IDE-RAID<->GigEthernet with encryption, 90MByte/s without, on modern > 2 - 3GHz PeeCees. In that case it's just decryption rather than > ssh+sshd running on the same CPU, so divide that throughput in half, > and you are in the same MB per MHz ballpark as the other results. I > think it is probably working properly. I think you are right. Getting about 1MB/s on a 300MHz UltraSPARC II with gcc seems pretty good, actually. I figured I would get about half the disk rate, so about 7MB/s, give or take. Clearly that will not happen. Sorry that I can't keep the thread going, but I don't subscribe to the list, and I've not been copied on the messages. Frank From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 28 06:28:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15B916A40F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:28:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bel@orel.ru) Received: from mail.orel.ru (relay.orel.ru [89.113.48.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B3D43D5C for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:28:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bel@orel.ru) Received: from [192.168.99.99] (pix.net.orel.ru [89.113.48.75]) by mail.orel.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8S6SS1v073125; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:28:30 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from bel@orel.ru) Message-ID: <451B6B8C.9040502@orel.ru> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:28:28 +0400 From: Andrew Belashov Organization: ORIS User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060123) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Jahnke References: <1159385171.850.237.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <1159385171.850.237.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Mail Servers on mail.orel.ru host X-Antivirus-Code: 100000 X-Zombi-Check: on netra2.orel.ru Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Terrible hme throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:28:40 -0000 Hello, Frank! Frank Jahnke wrote: > Any suggestions on how I can increase the network performance of my 1E+? Try my patch for hme(4) device polling(4): I use this patch without problems by two production machines from the moment of the publication. Network performance is very good on Ultra 60 (2x450MHz). FTP transfer rate more than 11 MB/s. scp transfer rate 2.5 MB/s. scp -c blowfish transfer rate 3.6 MB/s. -- With Best Regards, Andrew Belashov. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 11:57:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18ADA16A407; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868CC43D55; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:57:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8UBvWbp040793; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:57:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8UBvWXl098058; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:57:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 93DE17302F; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:57:32 -0400 (EDT) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20060930115732.93DE17302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:57:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.1, clamav-milter version 0.88.1 on clamscanner4 X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:57:34 -0000 TB --- 2006-09-30 11:41:50 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2006-09-30 11:41:50 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-09-30 11:41:50 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2006-09-30 11:42:23 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2006-09-30 11:42:23 - cd /tinderbox/HEAD/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2006-09-30 11:42:23 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2006-09-30 11:48:50 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe) TB --- 2006-09-30 11:48:50 - cd /src TB --- 2006-09-30 11:48:50 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> World build started on Sat Sep 30 11:48:51 UTC 2006 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes [...] ===> gnu/lib/libregex/doc (buildincludes) ===> gnu/lib/libreadline (buildincludes) ===> gnu/lib/libreadline/history (buildincludes) ===> gnu/lib/libreadline/history/doc (buildincludes) ===> gnu/lib/libreadline/readline (buildincludes) ===> gnu/lib/libreadline/readline/doc (buildincludes) ===> gnu/lib/libstdc++ (buildincludes) make: don't know how to make /src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/include/ext/demangle.h. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /src/gnu/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/gnu. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/gnu. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2006-09-30 11:57:32 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2006-09-30 11:57:32 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2006-09-30 11:57:32 - tinderbox aborted TB --- 1.06 user 5.28 system 942.01 real